Alterna ves Development & Evalua on



Similar documents
AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

Evanston Main Street Station TOD Plan and Study. Appendix A.1: Station Area Existing Conditions

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

Section ALTERNATIVES. 3. Alternatives

Accident Analysis of Sheridan Road between Isabella Street and South Boulevard

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

Corridor Goals and Objectives

Green Infrastructure for Great Cities

Flood Mitigation Strategy for the Milwaukee 30 th Street Corridor Redevelopment Program

General Obligation Bond Projects FYE

N Street Protected Bikeway

APPLICATION LAFAYETTE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

Alternatives Evaluation Overview

For more information, visit: rethinkingstreets.com

EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Building Blocks

Executive Summary. Transportation Needs CHAPTER. Existing Conditions

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET. Department of Rural and Municipal Aid. Office of Local Programs

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

BEST PRACTICES. Smart Transportation is a key concept for the Paoli Roadway Improvement Project.

3.1 Historical Considerations

Maryland Invests $845 Million in New Highway and Bridge Projects

Needs Analysis. Long Beach Bicycle Master Plan. Bicycle Commuter Needs. LONG BEACH BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Needs Analysis

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

Alternatives Presentation Meeting Middlebury WCRS(23)

Veterans Memorial Bridge (Orange Avenue) PD&E Study

Hurricanes and Storm Surge

Traffic Impact Study for the North Broadway Mixed-Use Development Chicago, Illinois. Prepared by

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND EVALUATION MEASURES

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

The Snelling Community Park and Playground Renovation Project

Chapter 2. Project Development. 2 Project Development

Motorcycle & Pedestrian Master Plans in Indianapolis, Indiana

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Port Austin Harbor, Michigan

Update on Previous Related Transportation Enhancement Grants

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Background and Goals for the Project

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN CRASH SURVERY

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

Significant investment and improvement of infrastructure and transport networks, delivered at no cost and no risk

INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN NOTIFICATION FORM / PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER


OVERVIEW PROJECT SUMMARY

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

Electronic Survey Round 1 Survey Results

Belmont Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project

Task 1 Project Management and Project Organization Work Plan

Illinois Tollway and Chicago Department of Transportation Construction Networking Event. March 13, 2015

How To Manage Transportation Asset Management

South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures

APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES

POINTS TO CONSIDER WHEN BUYING SHORELINE PROPERTY

A Bicycle Accident Study Using GIS Mapping and Analysis

In 2005, the City of Pasadena, CA, USA, with the support of consultants,

Surface Transportation Program (STP)

in Marina Del Rey Prepared by: County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works

A Presentation by the Project Managers: Rick Canizales Prince William County. Jana Lynott, AICP Northern Virginia Transportation Commission

FTP/SIS/FMTP Regional Workshop - Tampa

Montana Business Process to Link Planning Studies and NEPA/MEPA Reviews

Harlem River Bridges Access Plan

SECTION INLETS INLET LOCATIONS

Envision Venice Strategic Plan for Fiscal Year Ending. September 30, Preserving and Enhancing the Venice Quality of Life.

Welcome Welcome to the public exhibition for development at Bowman Field. This exhibition provides an overview of the proposals for the site.

Assessing Paved Trails for Compliance with Standards and Best Practices

Best Practices in Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding in the Washington Region Survey Results

Partnerships in Achieving Green Infrastructure Goals

Traffic Safety Initiatives in Tampa Bay Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Tropical Storm Debby. Post-Debby Beach/Dune Damage Assessment Report Sarasota Florida. By Weiqi Lin P.E., Ph.D. Coastal Resources/Community Services

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District STRATEGIC PLAN

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

Transcription:

Spring 2015 Newsletter Issue III WHERE ARE WE IN THE PROCESS? Since the NLSD Phase I Study kickoff in 2013, numerous meetings have been held with the public, the existing conditions and transportation needs have been identified, and the Purpose and Need Statement has been drafted and approved. The Project Study Group, consisting of Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Chicago Park District, and the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), is now in the process of identifying, developing and evaluating alternatives. WHAT'S NEXT? In 2015, we anticipate hosting the fourth Task Force Meeting and third Public Meeting. These meetings will be a chance for Task Force members and the general public to review the initial range of alternatives developed by the Project Study Group. The alternatives will address improvements needed along NLSD as documented in the Purpose and Need Statement. After these meetings are held, the Project Study Group will review the public input and select alternatives to be carried forward for more detailed study. Additional public meetings will be held during these steps as well. Alterna ves Development & Evalua on Ini al Alterna ves Alterna ves to Be Carried Forward Finalist Alterna ves Preferred Alterna ve Full Range of Alterna ves ONGOING PUBLIC OUTREACH Qualita ve evalua on for: Major Flaws Purpose & Need agreement We are here Qualita ve and Quan ta ve assessment of: Safety Mobility Access/Circula on Planning level costs Dra EIS Public Mee ng Public Mee ng Public Hearing Refine alterna ve features Quan ta ve assessment of criteria in greater detail Assess environmental impacts Refine alternative features Perform detailed environmental analysis & review Develop cost estimates Evaluate performance impacts and costs Develop detailed mitigation plans Select Preferred Alternative based on public input and technical analysis Final EIS and Record of Decision

TOP 20 IDEAS TO REDEFINE THE DRIVE Since the second North Lake Shore Drive public meeting in July 2014, the project team has been reviewing over 1,500 comments that describe how NLSD should be redefined. You had a lot to say and we have been listening! As we consider your ideas for potential solutions for NLSD, we wanted to pass along the Top 20 Ideas we received. The comments 1. Separate bike/pedestrian users on Lakefront Trail (263 Comments) 2. 5. 4. 7. 2 Grade separate Lakefront Trail at junctions and pedestrian tunnels (104) Separate Inner and Outer Drives (64) below are compiled from the July 2014 public meeting, where almost 400 ideas were submitted and the third Task Force meeting in April 2014, where over 1,200 ideas were submitted. The photos are used for illustrative purposes or provide a look at existing conditions. Improve Transit Service (185) 3. Improve east-west pedestrian/bike connections and facilities (134) Add trees and natural landscaping areas (101) 6. Add green space east of NLSD (Grand to LaSalle) (81) 8. Add green space between Inner and Outer Drives (61) 9. Realign the Oak Street curve (61) 10. Reduce/enforce speed limit on NLSD (56)

EXTREME WEATHER ON NLSD On October 31st, 2014, high winds caused waves from Lake Michigan to crash onto North Lake Shore Drive and close lanes. The National Weather Service reported winds up to 50 mph and 23-foot waves. Large slabs of asphalt pavement were broken along the trail, which resulted in around $200,000 worth of damage. Chicago Park District has since repaired the trail and cleared the debris. Residents have expressed their concerns about flood related issues, throughout the Phase 1 process. In fact, it was currently ranked #11 in the Top 20 Ideas. 11. Expand lake fill to improve shoreline flood protection (55) 12. Relocate and/or expand Oak Street Beach (51) Waves crashing over North Lake Shore Drive (via Twitter) Lakefront Trail pavement damage (via Twitter) *Photo credits 14. gopixpic.com 18. vioxinc.com 13. Add more pedestrian/bicycle access points to the lakefront (53) 14.* Improve signage and wayfinding including path mile markers (44) 17. 15. 18.* Reconfigure NLSD (tunnel, boulevard) (41) Improve storm water management/add bioswales (31) 16. Add a west side bicycle highway (33) 19. Construct a Chicago Avenue junction (30) 20. Expand park space at Oak Street & Michigan Avenue (32) Narrow the Inner Drive (22) 3

DID YOU KNOW! COASTAL CONSIDERATIONS The project team has been investigating and analyzing the complex components of the NLSD project including how WATER affects the corridor. Flooding in the study area can occur due to stormwater runoff as well as due to Lake Michigan wave action. Coastal considerations are an integral component of the NLSD Phase I Study. Baird & Associates, a member of the project team and foremost experts in the field of costal engineering, has undertaken an in-depth analysis to better understand these conditions and the impacts they may have on potential alternatives. This analysis included multiple surveys to document existing water depths and shoreline conditions as well as a thorough evaluation of wind, waves and water levels. These parameters have been utilized to generate computer models of the existing conditions. These models will serve as technical tools to assist the design team and the public with understanding the existing wave climate and currents in the project area, and will also be used to evaluate the impacts of these conditions on proposed alternatives. One of the primary considerations of any improvements will be the exposure of the Drive, the Lakefront Trail and Lincoln Park to wave overtopping and flooding. The prevention of flooding due to wave overtopping would require a tall shoreline structure to protect against extreme wave events, which in turn, would impact views of the lake. In locations where the viewshed is important, it will be necessary to provide a setback that will accommodate flood waters as they recede back into the lake during extreme storm events as illustrated in Image 1. Image 1 Did you know that the height of a near shore wave above normal water level can reach as much as 65% of the water depth? Image 2 illustrates that if the water is 10 feet deep, then a wave can potentially reach a height of 6.5 feet above the normal water level. Image 2 Image 3 What looks like a 10 foot high wall above water may look narrow at the surface but would be much wider at the lakebed. See Image 3. 4

PURPOSE & NEED STATEMENT APPROVED comments received thus far 37 internal Bi-weekly Meetings rounds of Task Force Meetings rounds of Public Meetings In December 2014, the NLSD Purpose & Need Statement was approved by the necessary regulatory and resource agencies including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Purpose & Need Statement has changed significantly since it was posted in May of 2014. Project stakeholders provided extensive and valuable input that allowed the Project Study Group to enhance the draft Purpose & Need Statement and better focus it on the diverse needs that exist in the project area. Since the draft Purpose & Need Statement was posted, the project team has reviewed your feedback, made revisions to the document and sought concurrence on the revised document from regulatory and resource agencies that are partners in the NEPA/404 Merger process. You can find a copy of the recently updated and approved Purpose & Need Statement posted on the project website: www.northlakeshoredrive.org PROJECT TEAM TOUR In October 2014, though it was a cold and blustery day, the North Lake Shore Drive project team and some critical regulatory agencies participated in a day-long tour of the North Lake Shore Drive study area and Northerly Island. Participants walked, rode Divvy bikes and took buses to see first-hand some of the challenges and opportunities within the study area. Participants reviewed locations within the study area including the Chicago Avenue intersection, Oak Street curve, numerous underpasses, the Passerelle bridge, the Belmont Avenue bus stop, the Lakefront Trail, Montrose Harbor, and the northern terminus at Hollywood Avenue. The project team observed peak rush hour congestion to better understand all modes of transportation and their conflict areas. Participants look towards the Oak Street Beach and observe the Oak Street curve. Chicago Park District discusses the Northerly Island renovation. The Chicago Park District discussed the Montrose Dunes Illinois Natural Area Inventory site and the bird sanctuary near Belmont Harbor. 5 WE'RE A SOCIAL BUNCH, SHARE WITH US Use the Drive for your daily commute? Walk, run or ride along the trail? Send us your favorite NLSD pictures and we will feature them in an upcoming presentation or on Facebook & Twitter! www.facebook.com/northlakeshoredrive @n_lakeshoredr info@northlakeshoredrive.org www.northlakeshoredrive.org