CECW-PB SUBJECT: Policy and Procedural Guidance for the Approval of Modification and Alteration of Corps of Engineer Projects



Similar documents
CECW-CP 21 June 16. No. 1 EC

SUBJECT: Economic Guidance Memorandum (EGM) 04-01, Generic Depth-Damage Relationships for Residential Structures with Basements.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C. Z

MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT (CESAJ-OD/ JIM W. JEFFORDS)

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress of the United States of America

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

I. Introduction. IT. Roles of the Agencies

Implementing the Water Resources Development Act of 2007

Distribution Restriction Statement

SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

Civil Works - FY 2015 CROmnibus & FY 2016 Budget

Public Law and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs

King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN COHASSET HARBOR COHASSET AND SCITUATE, MASSACHUSETTS

REVIEW PLAN For FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FOR DICKENSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVISA FORK BASIN DICKENSON COUNTY, VIRGINIA SECTION 202 NONSTRUCTURAL

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SOUTH ATLANTIC ONISI ON, CORPS OF ENGINEERS ROOM 10M15, 60 FORSYTH ST, S.W. ATLANTA. GEORGlA

33 CFR PART 332 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION FOR LOSSES OF AQUATIC RESOURCES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ; 33 U.S.C. 1344; and Pub. L

Oklahoma Governor s Water Conference

How to Become a Navy Engineer For $78,000 in USD

Release of EC USACE Process for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Levee System Evaluation. Frequently Asked Questions

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ER U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CE Washington, DC

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

Review Plan. F-4 Channel Rehabilitation. Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, Clark County, Nevada for Plans and Specification

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aligning Natural and Built Infrastructure for

Channel Maintenance Management Plan

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

New Orleans Hurricane Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Tour March 23 24, 2012

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET, NW WASHINGTON, D.C

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

2013 Water Resource Development Act (WRDA) Status Report and Update

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1-

Post-Flood Assessment

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

1. INTRODUCTION 5. THE PERMIT PROCESS

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

RESUME Lee A. Knuppel, P.E.

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

GAO FEDERAL REAL PROPERTY. Corps of Engineers Needs to Improve the Reliability of Its Real Property Disposal Data

MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDERS, MAJOR SUBORDINATE COMMANDS, ATTN: CHIEFS, OPERATIONS DIVISIONS

Eric D. (Ric) Hines, PE February 2012 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

PEER REVIEW PLAN JANUARY 2008 UPDATE

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SECTION 404 REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT CHANNEL AND BANK PROTECTION STRUCTURES ON THE SOUTH PLATTE RIVER

Watershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas

Presentation for SAME Industry Day

EXPIRES 30 SEPTEMPER2012 Project Operations Corps Project Notebook: A Database of US ACE Project Geographic Locations

December 4, Environment

Environmental Compliance Questionnaire for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Financial Assistance Applicants

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Federally Supported Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Programs

UPPER COLORADO AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASINS ENDANGERED FISH RECOVERY PROGRAMS

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE NATIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW PLAN MODEL

A Presentation to the Houston Hispanic Architects and Engineers

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE June 28, 2016

New Waters of the United States Definition Released

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Permit Water Quality Certification. Attn: Mark W. Alexander, Transportation Assistant Planning Director

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Chief Counsel s Civilian Honors Program

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

DECISION DOCUMENT REVIEW PLAN USING THE REGIONAL REVIEW PLAN MODEL

Final Independent External Peer Review Report of the Rio Grande de Arecibo, Puerto Rico Post Authorization Change Limited Reevaluation Report

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

WITNESSETH, THAT: of the existing Boston Harbor Navigation project (hereinafter the "O&M project," as defined in Article LB. of this agreement);

NOAA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

Yakima River Basin Integrated Water Resource Management Plan

SEP '1. Andrew Velasquez III Regional Administrator, Region V Federal EmergenCY~,M nagement Agency

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality

Amendments to the Rules of Practice and Procedure to Allow Each Signatory Party and the

DECISION DOCUMENT NATIONWIDE PERMIT 27

CITY OF SACRAMENTO 926 J STREET

AN ACT WATER AND IRRIGATION

Environmental Restoration - Flood Plains vs Potholes

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?

MITIGATION STRATEGY OVERVIEW

INSPECTION REIMBURSABLE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE S CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT

King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012

Beach Management Funding Assistance Program

Lockport Pool Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Illinois Waterway

INDONESIA - LAW ON WATER RESOURCES,

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

National Marine Sanctuaries Act

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

PARTS [RESERVED] PART 203 EMERGENCY EMPLOY- MENT OF ARMY AND OTHER RE- SOURCES, NATURAL DISASTER PROCEDURES. Subpart A Introduction

Managing Complexity: Implementing an Ecosystem Restoration Program*

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

(a) In General.--(1) Chapter 131 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before section 2223 the following new section:

How the Chicago District, US Army Corps of Engineers Conducts Project Management 20 November 2013

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

Transcription:

DISTRIBUTION: Commander, Great Lakes and Ohio River Division (CELRD) Commander, Mississippi Valley Division (CEMVD) Commander, North Atlantic Division (CENAD) Commander, Northwestern Division (CENWD) Commander, Pacific Ocean Division (CEPOD) Commander, South Atlantic Division (CESAD) Commander, South Pacific Division (CESPD) Commander, Southwestern Division (CESWD) 5

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY u.s. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET NW WASHINGTON, D.C. 20314-1000 CECW-PB OCT 2 3 2006 MEMORANDUM FOR MAJOR SUBORDINATE COMMANDS 1. REFERENCES: a. ER 1165-2-119, dated 20 September 1982, Modifications to Completed Projects b. 33 CFR 208.10, Local flood protection works; maintenance and operation of structures and facilities c. 33 USC 408, Taking possession of, use of, or injury to harbor and river improvements d. 33 CFR 320.4, General policies for evaluating permit applications e. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act f. Section 10 of the River and Harbors Act of 1899 2. PURPOSE. Recent events have demonstrated the need to provide clarification and additional guidance on the policy and procedures for dealing with proposals to modify or alter completed Corps of Engineers projects that are either locally or federally maintained. Often requests for modifications to Corps projects come up in the context of Section 404 permitting actions or for modifications to existing Corps projects for the purposes ofo&m. This memorandum addresses the use of the appropriate authority and the proper level ofapproval for such proposals. 3. BACKGROUND. a. ER 1165-2-119 provides policy and guidance on the modification of completed Corps of Engineers projects, and describes the specific circumstances under which modifications can be approved and accomplished. In general, proposed significant modification of a completed project, involving new Federal construction or real estate acquisition, and any proposed modification that would make the project serve new purposes, or increase the scope of services to authorized purposes beyond that intended at the time of construction, or to extend services to new beneficiaries (areas), requires authorization by Congress. There may be instances where reporting officers find that proposed significant changes to a completed project may be desirable, in which case investigations may be undertaken to document the need for and the feasibility of such project modifications. To the extent practicable, such changes should be accomplished under existing authorities. However, the circumstances under which such modifications can be approved and made are limited, as discussed in the ER, and are briefly summarized below. b. For projects constructed, operated and maintained by the Corps, the Corps may, as part of its operations and maintenance efforts, make reasonable changes and additions needed to

properly operate the project or minimize maintenance. In addition, multiple purpose projects operated and maintained by the Corps may be modified within existing authorities for dam safety assurance, changes in water control plans, addition ofwater supply, changes to meet water quality needs, and recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, as discussed in the ER. The Chief ofengineers also has limited discretion to modify navigation projects. For Corpsconstructed projects operated and maintained by local interests, any proposed Federal work at these projects usually requires congressional authorization, with the exception of work required to correct a design deficiency. c. Guidance on the responsibilities for the operation and maintenance of local protection projects is found in 33 CFR 208.10. This regulation describes local sponsors' responsibilities for operating and maintaining the structural soundness and functionality ofthe project in order to assure that the project meets its authorized purposes. Specifically, 33 CFR 208.10 a (5) requires that "no improvement shall be passed over, under, or through the walls, levees, improved channels or floodways, nor shall any excavation or construction be permitted within the limits of the project right-of-way, nor shall any change be made in any feature ofthe works without prior determination by the District Engineer" that such changes will not adversely affect the functioning ofthe protective facilities. The types ofchanges that can be considered and approved by a District Engineer under 33 CFR 208.10 are relatively minor, low impact modifications, such as pipes or pipelines proposed to pass over or through a Federal work, or a road or similar type of infrastructure improvement proposed to pass over a Federal levee. Such minor proposed modifications are considered part of a District Engineer's responsibilities related to normal O&M of such facilities. Any proposed modification ofa Federal work, such as a levee or channel, which would involve significant changes to the authorized project's scope, project purpose, or functioning, cannot be approved by the District Engineer, but instead must be forwarded through the Division Commander for the approval ofthe Chief ofengineers, as explained hereinafter. That is, any proposed change to a Federal work exceeding the level of ordinary District O&M responsibilities for a project must be sent through the Division Commander to the Chief of Engineers for approval, as discussed in the following paragraphs. d. Any proposed modification to an existing Corps projects (either federally or locally maintained) that go beyond those modifications required for normal O&M require approval under 33 USC 408. 33 USC 408 states that there shall be no temporary or permanent alteration, occupation or use ofany public works including but not limited to levees, sea walls, bulkheads, jetties and dikes for any purpose without the permission ofthe Secretary ofthe Army. Under the terms of 33 USC 408, any proposed modification requires a determination by the Secretary that such proposed alteration or permanent occupation or use of a Federal project is not injurious to the public interest and will not impair the usefulness of such work. The authority to make this determination and to approve modifications to Federal works under 33 USC 408 has been delegated to the Chief of Engineers. 2

4. POLICY. Any significant alteration or modification to either a locally or federally maintained Corps of Engineers project must be approved by the Chief of Engineers under 33 USC 408 unless covered by ER 1165-2-119. Modifications to a Corps projects beyond those necessary to properly operate the project or to minimize maintenance costs as well as any significant alteration or modification requested by any non-federal interest for their own benefit also requires the Chiefs approval under 33 USC 408. 5. PROCEDURES. a. The following information will be provided with any request for the approval of significant modifications or alterations to a locally or federally maintained Corps project requiring the Chief of Engineers approval under 33 USC 408. 1. A written request by the non-federal interests for approval ofthe project modification/alteration. 2. A physical and functional description ofthe existing project 3. A detailed description ofthe proposed modification 4. The purpose/need for the modification 5. A description ofany related, ongoing Corps studies/efforts in the watershed 6. A Public Interest Determination 7. Appropriate NEP A documentation 8. Any Administrative Record 9. A discussion of indirect effects 10. A discussion ofe.o. 11988 Considerations 11. Technical Analysis Technical adequacy of the design Changes in water surface profiles and flow distribution Assessment of anticipated local and system-wide resultant impacts, i.e., impacts on system integrity Upstream and downstream impacts ofthe proposed alterations, including potential impacts to existing floodplain management and water control management plans of Federal projects within the basin A discussion ofresidual risk b. Ifthere is an associated Section 40411 0 permit action, the required public interest and technical evaluations under 33 USC 408 can be done concurrently with that action. Upon completion of the public interest determination and ofthe technical analyses regarding the impact of the proposed modification on the usefulness ofthe project, the District Engineer will make a recommendation (with supporting documentation) through the Division Commander to 3

the Chief of Engineers (Attn: Appropriate RIT) for his consideration and approval under 33 USC 408. The District Engineer will make the final Section 404/10 permit decisions following the Chief of Engineers decision under 33 USC 408. A minimum of 30 days must be allowed for HQUSACE review. c. For locally operated and maintained Corps projects, the operations and maintenance for any approved project modifications or alterations will be the responsibility ofthe non-federal sponsor and the Project Cooperation Agreement or other appropriate document must be updated to address non-federal sponsor responsibilities for the approved modifications. 6. Ifthe desired modifications cannot be suitably pursued or approved under any of the preceding approaches, additional congressional authorization may be required. Section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 is the appropriate authority to use to consider such modifications. 7. Consideration will be given to further delegation ofthe approval authority to a lower level as we gain more experience with the types of changes that are proposed for approval under 33 USC 408. FOR THE COMMANDER: DONT. RILEY Major General, USA Director of Civil Works 4