Steel Design Report. Governing Criteria Stress Ratio



Similar documents
Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

Compression Members: Structural elements that are subjected to axial compressive forces

III. Compression Members. Design of Steel Structures. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

MODULE E: BEAM-COLUMNS

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Structural welding is a process by which the parts that are to be connected are heated and

Introduction. Background

Concrete Frame Design Manual

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

Chapter 8. Flexural Analysis of T-Beams

[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]

CHAPTER 13 CONCRETE COLUMNS

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

Design Parameters for Steel Special Moment Frame Connections

APOLLO SALES LTD SITE SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Frame Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional - Verification Manual for American codes

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

Deflections. Question: What are Structural Deflections?

RISABase. Rapid Interactive Structural Analysis Base Plate and Anchorage Analysis & Design. Version General Reference

Tutorial for Assignment #2 Gantry Crane Analysis By ANSYS (Mechanical APDL) V.13.0

International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL

Structural Design Calculation For Pergola

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

SAP2000 Getting Started Tutorial

Optimising plate girder design

Thank you for joining our live webinar today. We will begin shortly. Please standby. Thank you. Need Help? Call ReadyTalk Support:

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

SLAB DESIGN EXAMPLE. Deck Design (AASHTO LRFD 9.7.1) TYPICAL SECTION. County: Any Hwy: Any Design: BRG Date: 7/2010

Joist. Reinforcement. Draft 12/7/02

Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs

Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics)

MATERIALS AND MECHANICS OF BENDING

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS


ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Composite Floor Frame Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Guidance to developers of software for the design of composite beams

Steel Design Guide Series. Column Base Plates

16. Beam-and-Slab Design

Overhang Bracket Loading. Deck Issues: Design Perspective

VERTICAL MICROPILE LATERAL LOADING. Andy Baxter, P.G.

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.

ARCH 331 Structural Glossary S2014abn. Structural Glossary

Technical Assignment 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

Review of Design Code Experiences in Conversion from ASD Methodology to LRFD Methodology

Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns under Bidirectional Shear & Axial Loading

Design Analysis and Review of Stresses at a Point

Two-Way Post-Tensioned Design

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

FOUR-PLATE HEB-100 BEAM SPLICE BOLTED CONNECTIONS: TESTS AND COMMENTS

Long-term serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

research report Residential Hip Roof Framing Using Cold-Formed Steel Members RESEARCH REPORT RP06-2 American Iron and Steel Institute

Reinforced Concrete Design

Design of Concentrically Braced Frames

Nueva Edición del libro clásico para estudiantes de grado.

APPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS

EXPLORING THE TRUE GEOMETRY OF THE INELASTIC INSTANTANEOUS CENTER METHOD FOR ECCENTRICALLY LOADED BOLT GROUPS

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: LMT-Mercer Group, Inc. For: PRODUCT: 4" x 4" and 5" x 5" PVC Porch Posts with Aluminum Reinforcing

GUARDRAIL POST STEEL

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

5 G R A TINGS ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL. MBG Metal Bar Grating METAL BAR GRATING MANUAL MBG METAL BAR GRATING NAAMM

CE591 Fall 2013 Lecture 26: Moment Connections

Section 5A: Guide to Designing with AAC

1.054/1.541 Mechanics and Design of Concrete Structures (3-0-9) Outline 1 Introduction / Design Criteria for Reinforced Concrete Structures

Reinforced Concrete Slab Design Using the Empirical Method

Page 1 of Sven Alexander Last revised SB-Produksjon STATICAL CALCULATIONS FOR BCC 250

Mechanics of Materials Summary

Rigid and Braced Frames

5 Steel elements. 5.1 Structural design At present there are two British Standards devoted to the design of strucof tural steel elements:

8.2 Elastic Strain Energy

Stability. Security. Integrity.

DISTRIBUTION OF LOADSON PILE GROUPS

Full-Scale Load Testing of Steel Strutting System. For. Yongnam Holding Limited

EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES

Statics of Structural Supports

Comparative Study of Steel Structures Design Using IS 800:1984 & IS 800:2007

Crane Runway Girder. Dr. Ibrahim Fahdah Damascus University.

Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Rectangular Columns

CH 6: Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading

Design of Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls

UNRESTRAINED BEAM DESIGN I

Guidelines for the Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

Index Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12)

Figure A. Maximum load testing of new precast concrete floor plank system

THE RELIABILITY OF CAPACITY-DESIGNED COMPONENTS IN SEISMIC RESISTANT SYSTEMS

Load Factor Design for. Steel Buildings REVIEW OF CZECHOSLOVAK AND FRENCH SPECIFICATIONS. P. J. Marek

Transcription:

Steel Design Report Element: Untitled2 () Company: Description: User: Date: 01:06 PM Software: Digital Canal Steel Design 4.0 GENERAL INFORMATION Description Value Description Value Run Mode Design Mode K y 1.00 Design Code AISC 13th Edition LRFD K z 1.00 Beam-Column Length 12.00 ft Total Load Deflection Limit L / 240 Steel Yield Stress 50.00 ksi Live Load Deflection Limit L / 360 C b Calculation 12.5M max / ( 2.5M max + 3M A + 4M B + 3M C ) Lateral Torsional Braced (LTB) Length C mx Calculation Always use 1.0 (conservative) Section Shape HSS C my Calculation Always use 1.0 (conservative) Maximum Section Depth 20.00 in L x 12.00 ft Minimum Section Depth 3.00 in L y 12.00 ft Back-Back Distance (double angles only) - L z 12.00 ft Section Width (angles, double angles) - K x 1.00 Check Section List - Maximum Stress Ratio 1.000 LOAD INFORMATION Ref. Load Load Type Dir Begin Value Begin Position End Value End Position No. Case 1 Dead Concen Z -190.000 (kips) 12.000 - - 2 Live Linear Y -1.500 (kips / ft) 0.000-1.500 (kips / ft) 12.000 3 Wind Linear X -0.250 (kips / ft) 0.000-0.350 (kips / ft) 12.000 SELECTED LOAD COMBINATIONS Load Combination Code Check Total Live Dependent Conditional LC2: 1.40DL x - - LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL x - - LC4: 1.20DL+LL+1.60SL x - - LC5: 1.20DL+0.80WL+1.60SL x - - LC6: 1.20DL+LL+1.60WL+0.50SL x - - LC7: 1.20DL+LL+0.20SL+EL x - - LC8: 0.90DL+1.60WL x - - LC9: 0.90DL+EL x - - CRITICAL STRESS SUMMARY Ref. No. Section Name Opt. Mark Governing Criteria Stress Ratio Load Combination Distance 3 HSS7X9X1/2 - Axial-Bending 0.8207 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6.0000 4 HSS8X8X3/8 - Axial-Bending 0.9877 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6.0000 5 HSS9X9X5/16 - Axial-Bending 0.9518 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6.0000 CRITICAL STRESS DETAILS Section Name: HSS7X9X1/2 Axial kips 228.00 495.67 0.4600 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Bending-X ft-kips 51.748 127.50 0.4059 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Bending-Y ft-kips 0.0000 151.88 0.0000 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Interaction - - - 0.8207 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Shear-X kips -3.040 190.96 0.0159 LC8: 0.90DL+1.60WL 12 Shear-Y kips -14.400 140.74 0.1023 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 12 Section Name: HSS8X8X3/8

Steel Design Report for Untitled2 Page 2/5 Axial kips 228.00 399.69 0.5704 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Bending-X ft-kips 51.748 110.25 0.4694 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Bending-Y ft-kips 0.0000 110.25 0.0000 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Interaction - - - 0.9877 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Shear-X kips -3.040 131.04 0.0232 LC8: 0.90DL+1.60WL 12 Shear-Y kips -14.400 131.04 0.1099 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 12 Section Name: HSS9X9X5/16 Axial kips 228.00 395.53 0.5764 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Bending-X ft-kips 49.839 118.01 0.4223 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Bending-Y ft-kips 0.0000 118.01 0.0000 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Interaction - - - 0.9518 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 6 Shear-X kips -3.040 127.71 0.0238 LC8: 0.90DL+1.60WL 12 Shear-Y kips -14.400 127.71 0.1128 LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL 12

Steel Design Report for Untitled2 Page 3/5 INPUT PROPERTIES: Design Procedure for HSS8X8X3/8 Designed according to AISC 13th Edition (LRFD) Critical load effect at distance 6 feet under load combination LC3: 1.20DL+1.60LL+0.50SL A (in 2 ) 10.4 b f (in) 8 K x 1 S x(in 3 ) 24.9 I x (in 4 ) 100 t f (in) 0.349 K y 1 S y (in 3 ) 24.9 I y (in 4 ) 100 d (in) 8 K z 1 Z x(in 3 ) 29.4 r x (in) 3.1 t w (in) 0.349 L x (in) 144 Z y(in 3 ) 29.4 r y (in) 3.1 k (in) 0.698 L y (in) 144 J (in 4 ) 160 x 0 (in) 0 L b (in) 0 C w (in 6 ) 0 y 0 (in) 0 C b 1 a 0 x bar (in) 4 C mx 1 Welded No b 0 y bar (in) 4 C my 1 F y (ksi) 50 LOAD EFFECTS: P (kips) M x (ft-kips) M y (ft-kips) V x (kips) V y (kips) 228 43.2 0 0 0 SOLUTION 1. CHECK AXIAL STRENGTH (a). Flexural & Local Buckling KL / r max(k xl x / r x, K yl y / r y) 46.45 Q s for tubes and HSS Q s = 1.0 1 Q a Section is compact: Q a = 1 1 E7.2 Q Q s Q a 1 E7 F e F e = E p 2 / (KL / r) 2 132.6 E3-4 F cr (ksi) (for F e >= 0.44 Q F y) F cr = Q 0.658 Q Fy/Fe F y 42.7 E7-2 Axial Capacity: P n = F cr A = 444.1 kips: P c = F P n = 399.7 kips 2. CHECK FLEXURAL STRENGTH (a). X-Axis Yielding M n (ft-kips) M px = F y Z x 122.5 F7-1 (b). X-Axis Flange Local Buckling l b flat / t 19.92 Table B4.1 l p 1.12 (E / F y) 0.5 26.97 Table B4.1 l r 1.40 (E / F y) 0.5 33.72 Table B4.1 M n Flange is compact, M n = M p 122.5 F7.2.(a) (c). X-Axis Web Local Buckling l h flat / t 19.92 Table B4.1 l p 2.42 (E / F y) 0.5 58.28 Table B4.1 l r 5.70 (E / F y) 0.5 137.3 Table B4.1 M n Web is compact, M n = M p 122.5 F7.3.(a) (d). Y-Axis Yielding M n (ft-kips) M px = F y Z x 122.5 F7-1 (e). Y-Axis Flange Local Buckling l b flat / t 19.92 Table B4.1 l p 1.12 (E / F y) 0.5 26.97 Table B4.1 l r 1.40 (E / F y) 0.5 33.72 Table B4.1 M n Flange is compact, M n = M p 122.5

Steel Design Report for Untitled2 Page 4/5 (c). Y-Axis Web Local Buckling l h flat / t 19.92 Table B4.1 l p 2.42 (E / F y) 0.5 58.28 Table B4.1 l r 5.70 (E / F y) 0.5 137.3 Table B4.1 M n Web is compact, M n = M p 122.5 Flexural Capacity - Strong Axis: M nx = 122.5 ft-kips: M cx = FM nx = 110.3 ft-kips Flexural Capacity - Weak Axis: M ny = 122.5 ft-kips: M cy = FM ny = 110.3 ft-kips 3. CHECK AXIAL AND FLEXURAL INTERACTION P e1x (kips) P e1x = EI xp 2 / (MIN(1, K x)l x) 2 1380 C2-5 B 1x B 1x = C mx / (1 - ap r / P e1x) >= 1.0 1.198 C2-2 M rx (ft-kips) B 1xM rx 51.75 C2-1a P e1y (kips) P e1y = EI yp 2 / (MIN(1, K y)l y) 2 1380 C2-5 B 1y B 1y = C my / (1 - ap r / P e1y) >= 1.0 1.198 C2-2 M ry (ft-kips) B 1yM ry 0 C2-1a Axial and Flexural Interaction: for P r/p c >= 0.20: P r/p c + 8/9 ( M rx/m cx + M ry/m cy) = 0.9877 (H1-1a ) Note: 1). Moment magnification factor B 1 is conservatively applied to overall moment 2). Moment magnification factor B 2 is assumed to have been taken care of by P-Delta Analysis 3). a = 1 AXIAL-FLEXURAL INTERACTION STATUS: OK 4. CHECK SHEAR STRENGTH k v k v = 5.0 5.0 G5 C v C v = 1 1.00 G2-3 A w A w = 2 h flat t 4.85 G5 where h flat = d - 3 t V ny V ny = 0.6 F ya wc v 145.60 G2-1 k v k v = 5.0 5.0 G5 C v C v = 1 1.00 G2-3 A w A w = 2 b flat t 4.85 G5 where b flat = b - 3 t V nx V ny = 0.6 F ya wc v 145.60 G2-1 V cy = FV ny = 131 V ry = 0 V ry / V cy = 0 SHEAR-Y STATUS: OK V cx = FV nx = 131 V rx = 0 V rx / V cx = 0 SHEAR-X STATUS: OK 5. CHECK TOTAL LOAD DEFLECTIONS (Load Combination: D x - Not Applicable, D y - Not Applicable) Allowable D x L/240 0.60 Not Applicable Allowable D y L/240 0.60 Not Applicable Note: D x(act.) / D x(all.) = 0.00 / 0.60 = 0.00 TOTAL LOAD DEFLECTION-X STATUS: OK D y(act.) / D y(all.) = 0.00 / 0.60 = 0.00 TOTAL LOAD DEFLECTION-Y STATUS: OK

Steel Design Report for Untitled2 Page 5/5 6. CHECK LIVE LOAD DEFLECTIONS (Load Combination: D x - Not Applicable, D y - Not Applicable) Allowable D x L/360 0.40 Not Applicable Allowable D y L/360 0.40 Not Applicable Note: D x(act.) / D x(all.) = 0.00 / 0.40 = 0.00 LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION-X STATUS: OK D y(act.) / D y(all.) = 0.00 / 0.40 = 0.00 LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION-Y STATUS: OK