|
|
|
- Magdalene McKinney
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3
4
5
6 ATTACHMENT A
7 AT&T MOBILITY SITE NAME: CANAAN- ROUTE 7 SOUTH 188ROUTE7SOUTH CANAAN, CT 06031
8
9 ATTACHMENT B
10 S t r u c t u r a l A n a l y s i s R e p o r t f t E x i s t i n g E E I M o n o p i n e P r o p o s e d A T & T M o b i l i t y A n t e n n a U p g r a d e A T & T S i t e R e f : C T V e r i z o n S i t e R e f : F a l l s V i l l a g e R o u t e 7 F a l l s V i l l a g e ( C a n a a n ), C T C e n t e k P r o j e c t N o D a t e : N o v e m b e r 2 5, R e v 1 : J a n u a r y 2 2, R e v 2 : F e b r u a r y 3, Prepared for: AT&T Mob ility 500 Enterprise Drive, Suite 3A Rocky Hill, CT 06067
11 CENTE Engineering, Inc. Structural Analysis 157- EEI Monopine AT&T Mobility Antenna Upgrade CT2413 Canaan, CT Rev 2 ~ February 3, 2014 T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s SECTION 1 - REPORT INTRODUCTION. ANTENNA AND APPURTENANCE SUMMARY. PRIMARY ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE ANALYSIS. ANALYSIS. TOWER LOADING. TOWER CAPACITY. FOUNDATION AND ANCHORS. CONCLUSION. SECTION 2 CONDITIONS & SOFTWARE STANDARD ENGINEERING CONDITIONS. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROGRAM. SECTION 3 CALCULATIONS tnxtower INPUT/OUTPUT SUMMARY. tnxtower DETAILED OUTPUT. ANCHOR BOLT AND BASE PLATE ANALYSIS. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS. SECTION 4 REFERENCE MATERIAL RF DATA SHEET. ANTENNA CUT SHEETS. TABLE OF CONTENTS TOC-1
12 CENTE Engineering, Inc. Structural Analysis 157- EEI Monopine AT&T Mobility Antenna Upgrade CT2413 Canaan, CT Rev 2 ~ February 3, 2014 I n t r o d u c t i o n The purpose of this report is to summarize the results of the non-linear, P- structural analysis of the antenna upgrade proposed by AT&T Mobility on the existing monopine (tower) located in Canaan, CT. The host tower is a 157- tall, three-section, eighteen sided, tapered monopine, originally designed and manufactured by Engineered Endeavors job no; 16975, dated February 6, The tower geometry, structure member sizes and foundation system information were obtained from the aforementioned design documents. Antenna and appurtenance information were obtained from visual verification from grade conducted by Centek personnel on October 29, 2013 and a AT&T RF data sheet. The tower is made up of three (3) tapered vertical sections consisting of A pole sections. The vertical tower sections are slip joint connected. The diameter of the pole (flat-flat) is in at the top and in at the base. AT&T Mobility proposes the installation of nine (9) panel antennas, twenty-four (24) remote radio heads, nine (9) A2 s, six (6) diplexers and four (4) surge arrestors mounted on a proposed platform. Refer to the Antenna and Appurtenance Summary below for a detailed description of the proposed antenna and appurtenance configuration. A n t e n n a a n d A p p u r t e n a n c e S u m m a r y The existing, proposed and future loads considered in this analysis consist of the following: VERIZON (Existing): Antennas: Six (6) Antel BXA CF panel antennas, six (6) BXA BF panel antennas, three (3) Alcatel-Lucent RRH2x40-AWS Remote Radio Heads, three (3) Alcatel-Lucent RRH2x40-07-U Remote Radio Heads and one (1) RFS DB- T1-6Z-8AB-0Z main distribution box mounted on a 10- T-arm array with a RAD center elevation of 147- above grade. Coax Cables: Two (2) 1-5/8 fiber cable running on the inside of the existing tower. AT&T MOBILITY (Proposed): Antennas: Six (6) CCI HPA-65R-BUU-H6 panel antennas, three (3) CCI OPA- 65R-LCUU-H6 panel antennas, nine (9) Ericsson RRUS-11 remote radio units, nine (9) Ericsson RRUS-12 remote radio units, three (3) Ericsson RRUS-32 remote radio units, three (3) Ericsson RRUS-E2 remote radio units, nine (9) Ericsson A2 remote radio units, six (6) aelus DBC0062F1V diplexers and four (4) Raycap DC F surge arrestors mounted on two (2) Site-Pro Monopole Triple T-Arm its (stacked) p/n RMV with a RAD center elevation of 137- above grade level. Coax Cables: Two (2) fiber trunks and eight (8) DC trunks running on the inside of the existing tower. REPORT SECTION 1-1
13 CENTE Engineering, Inc. Structural Analysis 157- EEI Monopine AT&T Mobility Antenna Upgrade CT2413 Canaan, CT Rev 2 ~ February 3, 2014 P r i m a r y A s s u m p t i o n s U s e d i n t h e A n a l y s i s The tower structure s theoretical capacity not including any assessment of the condition of the tower. The tower carries the horizontal and vertical loads due to the weight of antennas, ice load and wind. Tower is properly installed and maintained. Tower is in plumb condition. Tower loading for antennas and mounts as listed in this report. All bolts are appropriately tightened providing the necessary connection continuity. All welds are fabricated with ER-70S-6 electrodes. All members are assumed to be as specified in the original tower design documents or reinforcement drawings. All members are hot dipped galvanized in accordance with ASTM A123 and ASTM A153 Standards. All member protective coatings are in good condition. All tower members were properly designed, detailed, fabricated, installed and have been properly maintained since erection. Any deviation from the analyzed antenna loading will require a new analysis for verification of structural adequacy. All existing coax cables to be installed as indicated in this report. REPORT SECTION 1-2
14 CENTE Engineering, Inc. Structural Analysis 157- EEI Monopine AT&T Mobility Antenna Upgrade CT2413 Canaan, CT Rev 2 ~ February 3, 2014 A n a l y s i s The existing tower was analyzed using a comprehensive computer program entitled tnxtower. The program analyzes the tower, considering the worst case loading condition. The tower is considered as loaded by concentric forces along the tower sha, and the model assumes that the sha members are subjected to bending, axial, and shear forces. The existing tower was analyzed for the controlling basic wind speed (fastest mile) with no ice and a 75% reduction of wind force with ½ inch accumulative ice to determine stresses in members as per guidelines of TIA/EIA-222-F-96 entitled Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) and the Manual of Steel Construction; Allowable Stress Design (ASD). The controlling wind speed is determined by evaluating the local available wind speed data as provided in Appendix of the CSBC 1 and the wind speed data available in the TIA/EIA-222-F- 96 Standard. The higher of the two wind speeds is utilized in preparation on the tower analysis. T o w e r L o a d i n g Tower loading was determined by the basic wind speed as applied to projected surface areas with modification factors per TIA/EIA-222-F, gravity loads of the tower structure and its components, and the application of ½ radial ice on the tower structure and its components. Basic Wind Speed: Litchfield; v = 80 mph (fastest mile) Canaan; v = 90 mph (3 second gust) equivalent to v = 75 mph (fastest mile) TIA/EIA-222-F wind speed controls. [Section 16 of TIA/EIA-222-F-96] [Appendix of the 2005 CT Building Code Supplement] Load Cases: Load Case 1; 80 mph wind speed w/ no ice plus gravity load used in calculation of tower stresses and rotation. Load Case 2; 69 mph wind speed w/ ½ radial ice plus gravity load used in calculation of tower stresses. The 69 mph wind speed velocity represents 75% of the wind pressure generated by the 80 mph wind speed. Load Case 3; Seismic not checked [Section of TIA/EIA-222-F- 96] [Section of TIA/EIA-222-F- 96] [Section of State Bldg. Code 2005] does not control in the design of this structure type 1 The 2005 Connecticut State Building Code as amended by the 2009 CT State Supplement. (CSBC) REPORT SECTION 1-3
15 CENTE Engineering, Inc. Structural Analysis 157- EEI Monopine AT&T Mobility Antenna Upgrade CT2413 Canaan, CT Rev 2 ~ February 3, 2014 T o w e r C a p a c i t y Tower stresses were calculated utilizing the structural analysis soware tnxtower. Allowable stresses were determined based on Table 5 of the TIA/EIA code with a 1/3 increase per Section of the same code. Calculated stresses were found to be within allowable limits. In Load Case 1, per tnxtower Section Capacity Table, this tower was found to be at 90.1% of its total capacity. Tower Section Elevation Stress Ratio (percentage of capacity) Result Pole Sha (L2) % PASS F o u n d a t i o n a n d A n c h o r s The existing foundation consists of an 7.0- square x 3.0- long reinforced concrete pier on a square x 3.0- thick reinforced concrete pad bearing directly on existing sub grade. The sub-grade conditions used in the analysis of the existing foundation were obtained from the geotechnical report prepared by Terracon job no; J dated April 30, The base of the tower is connected to the foundation by means of (24) 2.25, ASTM A anchor bolts embedded approximately 5- into the concrete foundation structure. The tower base reactions developed from the governing Load Case 1 were used in the verification of the foundation and its anchors: Location Vector Proposed Reactions Shear Base Compression Moment The foundation was found to be within allowable limits. 50 kips 50 kips 5423 kip- Note 1: Note 2: Foundation Reinforced Concrete Mat Design Limit FS denotes Factor of Safety OM denotes Overturning Moment. IBC 2003/2005 CT State Building Code Section (FS) (1) Proposed Loading (FS) (1) Result OM (2) PASS REPORT SECTION 1-4
16
17 CENTE Engineering, Inc. Structural Analysis 157- EEI Monopine AT&T Mobility Antenna Upgrade CT2413 Canaan, CT Rev 2 ~ February 3, 2014 S t a n d a r d C o n d i t i o n s f o r F u r n i s h i n g o f P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s o n E x i s t i n g S t r u c t u r e s All engineering services are performed on the basis that the information used is current and correct. This information may consist of, but is not necessarily limited to: Information supplied by the client regarding the structure itself, its foundations, the soil conditions, the antenna and feed line loading on the structure and its components, or other relevant information. Information from the field and/or drawings in the possession of Centek Engineering, Inc. or generated by field inspections or measurements of the structure. It is the responsibility of the client to ensure that the information provided to Centek Engineering, Inc. and used in the performance of our engineering services is correct and complete. In the absence of information to the contrary, we assume that all structures were constructed in accordance with the drawings and specifications and are in an uncorroded condition and have not deteriorated. It is therefore assumed that its capacity has not significantly changed from the as new condition. All services will be performed to the codes specified by the client, and we do not imply to meet any other codes or requirements unless explicitly agreed in writing. If wind and ice loads or other relevant parameters are to be different from the minimum values recommended by the codes, the client shall specify the exact requirement. In the absence of information to the contrary, all work will be performed in accordance with the latest revision of ANSI/ASCE10 & ANSI/EIA-222 All services performed, results obtained, and recommendations made are in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. Centek Engineering, Inc. is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions and recommendations made by others based on the information we supply. REPORT SECTION 2-1
18 CENTE Engineering, Inc. Structural Analysis 157- EEI Monopine AT&T Mobility Antenna Upgrade CT2413 Canaan, CT Rev 2 ~ February 3, 2014 G E N E R A L D E S C R I P T I O N O F S T R U C T U R A L A N A L Y S I S P R O G R A M tnxtower, is an integrated structural analysis and design soware package for Designed specifically for the telecommunications industry, tnxtower, formerly ERITower, automates much of the tower analysis and design required by the TIA/EIA 222 Standard. tnxtower Features: tnxtower can analyze and design 3- and 4-sided guyed towers, 3- and 4-sided selfsupporting towers and either round or tapered ground mounted poles with or without guys. The program analyzes towers using the TIA-222-G (2005) standard or any of the previous TIA/EIA standards back to RS-222 (1959). Steel design is checked using the AISC ASD 9th Edition or the AISC LRFD specifications. Linear and non-linear (P-delta) analyses can be used in determining displacements and forces in the structure. Wind pressures and forces are automatically calculated. Extensive graphics plots include material take-off, shear-moment, leg compression, displacement, twist, feed line, guy anchor and stress plots. tnxtower contains unique features such as True Cable behavior, hog rod take-up, foundation stiffness and much more. REPORT SECTION 2-2
19 150.0 Section Length () Number of Sides Thickness (in) Socket Length () Top Dia (in) Bot Dia (in) Grade A Weight () SHEAR 45 TORQUE 1 kip- 69 mph WIND in ICE AXIAL 50 SHEAR 50 AXIAL 62 MOMENT 5007 kip- MOMENT 5423 kip- TORQUE 1 kip- REACTIONS - 80 mph WIND BXA CF BXA-70063/6CF RRH2x40-AWS RRH2x40-07-U DB-T1-6Z-8AB-0Z EEI (2) DC F OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (3) RRUS-32 RRUS-E2 Site Falls A2 RRUS-11 RRUS-12 DBC0062F1V 10- Pro Village (ATT RMV T-Arm (ATT - Branch (ATT Array - Proposed) Surge (ATT (ATT (Verizon - - Arrestor Proposed) - Existing) - (ATT Existing) Proposed) TYPE ELEVATION Falls Village Branch BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) 147 RRH2x40-AWS (Verizon - Existing) 147 RRH2x40-AWS (Verizon - Existing) 147 RRH2x40-AWS (Verizon - Existing) 147 RRH2x40-07-U (Verizon - Existing) 147 RRH2x40-07-U (Verizon - Existing) 147 RRH2x40-07-U (Verizon - Existing) 147 DB-T1-6Z-8AB-0Z (Verizon - Existing) 147 EEI 10- T-Arm Array (Verizon - Existing) DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING 147 Site Pro RMV12 (ATT - Proposed) (3) A2 (ATT - Proposed) 137 (3) A2 (ATT - Proposed) 137 (2) DBC0062F1V (ATT - Proposed) 137 (2) DBC0062F1V (ATT - Proposed) 137 (2) DBC0062F1V (ATT - Proposed) 137 DC F Surge Arrestor (ATT - Proposed) DC F Surge Arrestor (ATT - Proposed) DC F Surge Arrestor (ATT - Proposed) MATERIAL STRENGTH GRADE Fy Fu GRADE A ksi 80 ksi TYPE ELEVATION DC F Surge Arrestor (ATT Proposed) (3) A2 (ATT - Proposed) 137 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 Falls Village Branch OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (ATT - Proposed) 137 (3) RRUS-11 (ATT - Proposed) 137 (3) RRUS-11 (ATT - Proposed) 137 (3) RRUS-11 (ATT - Proposed) 137 (3) RRUS-12 (ATT - Proposed) 137 (3) RRUS-12 (ATT - Proposed) 137 (3) RRUS-12 (ATT - Proposed) 137 RRUS-32 (ATT - Proposed) 137 RRUS-32 (ATT - Proposed) 137 RRUS-32 (ATT - Proposed) 137 RRUS-E2 (ATT - Proposed) 137 RRUS-E2 (ATT - Proposed) 137 RRUS-E2 (ATT - Proposed) 137 Site Pro RMV (ATT - Proposed) Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch 2 97 Falls Village Branch 2 87 Falls Village Branch 2 77 Falls Village Branch 1 67 TOWER DESIGN NOTES 1. Tower designed for a 80 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA/EIA-222-F Standard. 2. Tower is also designed for a 69 mph basic wind with 0.50 in ice. 3. Deflections are based upon a 50 mph wind. 4. Weld together tower sections have flange connections. 5. Connections use galvanized A325 bolts, nuts and locking devices. Installation per TIA/EIA-222 and AISC Specifications. 6. Tower members are "hot dipped" galvanized in accordance with ASTM A123 and ASTM A153 Standards. 7. Welds are fabricated with ER-70S-6 electrodes. 8. TOWER RATING: 90.1% Fy Fu Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Job: CT2413 Project: 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT Client: AT&T Mobility Drawn by: TJL App'd: Code: TIA/EIA-222-F Date: 02/03/14 Scale: NTS Path: J:\Jobs\ WI\04_Structural\Backup Documentation\Calcs\Rev (2)\ERI Files\157' Monopine_ Dwg No. E-1 Canaan, CT.eri
20 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 1 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Tower Input Data There is a pole section. This tower is designed using the TIA/EIA-222-F standard. The following design criteria apply: Basic wind speed of 80 mph. Nominal ice thickness of in. Ice density of 56 pcf. A wind speed of 69 mph is used in combination with ice. Temperature drop of 50 F. Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 50 mph. Weld together tower sections have flange connections.. Connections use galvanized A325 bolts, nuts and locking devices. Installation per TIA/EIA-222 and AISC Specifications.. Tower members are ''hot dipped'' galvanized in accordance with ASTM A123 and ASTM A153 Standards.. Welds are fabricated with ER-70S-6 electrodes.. A non-linear (P-delta) analysis was used. Pressures are calculated at each section. Stress ratio used in pole design is Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feedline supports, and appurtenance mounts are not considered. Options Consider Moments - Legs Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder Consider Moments - Horizontals Assume Legs Pinned Use ASCE 10 X-Brace Ly Rules Consider Moments - Diagonals Assume Rigid Index Plate Calculate Redundant Bracing Forces Use Moment Magnification Use Clear Spans For Wind Area Ignore Redundant Members in FEA Use Code Stress Ratios Use Clear Spans For L/r SR Leg Bolts Resist Compression Use Code Safety Factors - Guys Retension Guys To Initial Tension All Leg Panels Have Same Allowable Escalate Ice Bypass Mast Stability Checks Offset Girt At Foundation Always Use Max z Use Azimuth Dish Coefficients Consider Feedline Torque Use Special Wind Profile Project Wind Area of Appurt. Include Angle Block Shear Check Include Bolts In Member Capacity Autocalc Torque Arm Areas Poles Leg Bolts Are At Top Of Section SR Members Have Cut Ends Include Shear-Torsion Interaction Secondary Horizontal Braces Leg Sort Capacity Reports By Component Always Use Sub-Critical Flow Use Diamond Inner Bracing (4 Sided) Triangulate Diamond Inner Bracing Use Top Mounted Sockets Add IBC.6D+W Combination Section Elevation Section Length Tapered Pole Section Geometry Splice Length Number of Sides Top Diameter in Bottom Diameter in Wall Thickness in Bend Radius in Pole Grade L A (65 ksi) L A (65 ksi) L A (65 ksi)
21 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 2 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Tapered Pole Properties Section Tip Dia. Area I r C I/C J It/Q w w/t in in 2 in 4 in in in 3 in 4 in 2 in L L L Tower Elevation L L L Gusset Area (per face) 2 Gusset Thickness in Gusset Grade Adjust. Factor A f Adjust. Factor A r Weight Mult Double Angle Stitch Bolt Spacing Diagonals in Double Angle Stitch Bolt Spacing Horizontals in Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area Description Fiber Trunk (AT&T - Proposed) DC Trunk (AT&T - Proposed) HYBRIFLEX 1-5/8'' (Verizon - Existing) Allow Shield Component Type Placement Total Number C No Inside Pole No Ice C No Inside Pole No Ice Face or Leg B No Inside Pole No Ice C AA A 2 / Weight klf Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas Tower Section Tower Elevation Face L A B C L A B C L A B C A R 2 A F 2 C AA A In Face 2 C AA A Out Face 2 Weight
22 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 3 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas - With Ice Tower Section Tower Elevation Face or Leg L A B C L A B C L A B C A R Ice Thickness in A F 2 C AA A In Face 2 C AA A Out Face 2 Weight Discrete Tower Loads Description HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) HPA-65R-BUU-H8 (AT&T - Proposed) (3) RRUS-11 (AT&T - Proposed) (3) RRUS-11 (AT&T - Proposed) Face or Leg Offset Type Offsets: Horz Lateral Vert A From Face A From Face A From Face B From Face B From Face B From Face C From Face C From Face C From Face A From Face B From Face Azimuth Adjustment Placement No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice C AA A Front C AA A Side Weight
23 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 4 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Description (3) RRUS-11 (AT&T - Proposed) (3) RRUS-12 (AT&T - Proposed) (3) RRUS-12 (AT&T - Proposed) (3) RRUS-12 (AT&T - Proposed) RRUS-32 (AT&T - Proposed) RRUS-32 (AT&T - Proposed) RRUS-32 (AT&T - Proposed) RRUS-E2 (AT&T - Proposed) RRUS-E2 (AT&T - Proposed) RRUS-E2 (AT&T - Proposed) (3) A2 (AT&T - Proposed) (3) A2 (AT&T - Proposed) (3) A2 (AT&T - Proposed) (2) DBC0062F1V (AT&T - Proposed) (2) DBC0062F1V (AT&T - Proposed) (2) DBC0062F1V (AT&T - Proposed) DC F Surge Arrestor (AT&T - Proposed) DC F Surge Arrestor (AT&T - Proposed) DC F Surge Arrestor (AT&T - Proposed) Face or Leg Offset Type Offsets: Horz Lateral Vert C From Face A From Face B From Face C From Face A From Face B From Face C From Face A From Face A From Face A From Face A From Face B From Face C From Face A From Face B From Face C From Face A From Face B From Face C From Face Azimuth Adjustment Placement No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice C AA A Front C AA A Side Weight
24 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 5 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Description DC F Surge Arrestor (AT&T - Proposed) Site Pro RMV12 (AT&T - Proposed) Site Pro RMV (AT&T - Proposed) Face or Leg Offset Type Offsets: Horz Lateral Vert C From Face Azimuth Adjustment Placement No Ice C None No Ice C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 1 C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 3 C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 3 C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 3 C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 2 C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 2 C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 2 C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 2 C None No Ice Falls Village Branch 1 C None No Ice BXA CF A From Face No Ice (Verizon - Existing) BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) BXA CF (Verizon - Existing) A From Face A From Face A From Face B From Face B From Face B From Face B From Face C From Face C From Face C From Face No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice No Ice C AA A Front C AA A Side Weight
25 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 6 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Description BXA-70063/6CF (Verizon - Existing) RRH2x40-AWS (Verizon - Existing) RRH2x40-AWS (Verizon - Existing) RRH2x40-AWS (Verizon - Existing) RRH2x40-07-U (Verizon - Existing) RRH2x40-07-U (Verizon - Existing) RRH2x40-07-U (Verizon - Existing) DB-T1-6Z-8AB-0Z (Verizon - Existing) EEI 10- T-Arm Array (Verizon - Existing) Face or Leg Offset Type Offsets: Horz Lateral Vert Azimuth Adjustment Placement C From Face No Ice A From Face No Ice B From Face No Ice C From Face No Ice A From Face No Ice B From Face No Ice C From Face No Ice C From Face No Ice C None No Ice C AA A Front C AA A Side Weight Tower Pressures - No Ice G H = Section Elevation L L L z Z q z ksf A G 2 F a c e A B C A B C A B C A F 2 A R A leg Leg % C AA A In Face 2 C AA A Out Face 2 Tower Pressure - With Ice
26 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 7 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL G H = Section Elevation L L z Z q z F a c ksf in 2 e A B C A B C L A B C t Z A G A F 2 A R A leg Leg % C AA A In Face 2 C AA A Out Face 2 Tower Pressure - Service G H = Section Elevation L L L z Z q z ksf A G 2 F a c e A B C A B C A B C A F 2 A R A leg Leg % C AA A In Face 2 C AA A Out Face 2 Tower Forces - No Ice - Wind Normal To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C
27 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 8 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Tower Forces - No Ice - Wind 45 To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C Tower Forces - No Ice - Wind 60 To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C Tower Forces - No Ice - Wind 90 To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C
28 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 9 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Tower Forces - With Ice - Wind Normal To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C Tower Forces - With Ice - Wind 45 To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight Tower Forces - With Ice - Wind 60 To Face F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 klf L A C B C L A C B C L A C B C Sum Weight: OTM F w Ctrl. Face
29 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 10 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 kip- F w klf Ctrl. Face Tower Forces - With Ice - Wind 90 To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C Tower Forces - Service - Wind Normal To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C Tower Forces - Service - Wind 45 To Face Section Elevation L Add Weight Self Weight F a c e A B C e C F R R D F D R A E F w Ctrl. Face klf C
30 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 11 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C Tower Forces - Service - Wind 60 To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C Tower Forces - Service - Wind 90 To Face Section Elevation Add Weight Self Weight F a c e e C F R R D F D R A E 2 L A B C L A B C L A B C Sum Weight: OTM kip- F w Ctrl. Face klf C C C Force Totals
31 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 12 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Load Case Vertical Forces Sum of Forces X Sum of Forces Z Sum of Overturning Moments, M x kip- Sum of Overturning Moments, M z kip- Sum of Torques kip- Leg Weight Bracing Weight Total Member Self-Weight Total Weight Wind 0 deg - No Ice Wind 30 deg - No Ice Wind 45 deg - No Ice Wind 60 deg - No Ice Wind 90 deg - No Ice Wind 120 deg - No Ice Wind 135 deg - No Ice Wind 150 deg - No Ice Wind 180 deg - No Ice Wind 210 deg - No Ice Wind 225 deg - No Ice Wind 240 deg - No Ice Wind 270 deg - No Ice Wind 300 deg - No Ice Wind 315 deg - No Ice Wind 330 deg - No Ice Member Ice Total Weight Ice Wind 0 deg - Ice Wind 30 deg - Ice Wind 45 deg - Ice Wind 60 deg - Ice Wind 90 deg - Ice Wind 120 deg - Ice Wind 135 deg - Ice Wind 150 deg - Ice Wind 180 deg - Ice Wind 210 deg - Ice Wind 225 deg - Ice Wind 240 deg - Ice Wind 270 deg - Ice Wind 300 deg - Ice Wind 315 deg - Ice Wind 330 deg - Ice Total Weight Wind 0 deg - Service Wind 30 deg - Service Wind 45 deg - Service Wind 60 deg - Service Wind 90 deg - Service Wind 120 deg - Service Wind 135 deg - Service Wind 150 deg - Service Wind 180 deg - Service Wind 210 deg - Service Wind 225 deg - Service Wind 240 deg - Service Wind 270 deg - Service Wind 300 deg - Service Wind 315 deg - Service Wind 330 deg - Service
32 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 13 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Load Combinations Comb. No. 1 Dead Only 2 Dead+Wind 0 deg - No Ice 3 Dead+Wind 30 deg - No Ice 4 Dead+Wind 45 deg - No Ice 5 Dead+Wind 60 deg - No Ice 6 Dead+Wind 90 deg - No Ice 7 Dead+Wind 120 deg - No Ice 8 Dead+Wind 135 deg - No Ice 9 Dead+Wind 150 deg - No Ice 10 Dead+Wind 180 deg - No Ice 11 Dead+Wind 210 deg - No Ice 12 Dead+Wind 225 deg - No Ice 13 Dead+Wind 240 deg - No Ice 14 Dead+Wind 270 deg - No Ice 15 Dead+Wind 300 deg - No Ice 16 Dead+Wind 315 deg - No Ice 17 Dead+Wind 330 deg - No Ice 18 Dead+Ice+Temp 19 Dead+Wind 0 deg+ice+temp 20 Dead+Wind 30 deg+ice+temp 21 Dead+Wind 45 deg+ice+temp 22 Dead+Wind 60 deg+ice+temp 23 Dead+Wind 90 deg+ice+temp 24 Dead+Wind 120 deg+ice+temp 25 Dead+Wind 135 deg+ice+temp 26 Dead+Wind 150 deg+ice+temp 27 Dead+Wind 180 deg+ice+temp 28 Dead+Wind 210 deg+ice+temp 29 Dead+Wind 225 deg+ice+temp 30 Dead+Wind 240 deg+ice+temp 31 Dead+Wind 270 deg+ice+temp 32 Dead+Wind 300 deg+ice+temp 33 Dead+Wind 315 deg+ice+temp 34 Dead+Wind 330 deg+ice+temp 35 Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service 36 Dead+Wind 30 deg - Service 37 Dead+Wind 45 deg - Service 38 Dead+Wind 60 deg - Service 39 Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service 40 Dead+Wind 120 deg - Service 41 Dead+Wind 135 deg - Service 42 Dead+Wind 150 deg - Service 43 Dead+Wind 180 deg - Service 44 Dead+Wind 210 deg - Service 45 Dead+Wind 225 deg - Service 46 Dead+Wind 240 deg - Service 47 Dead+Wind 270 deg - Service 48 Dead+Wind 300 deg - Service 49 Dead+Wind 315 deg - Service 50 Dead+Wind 330 deg - Service Description Maximum Member Forces Section No. Elevation Component Type Condition Gov. Load Comb. Force Major Axis Moment kip- Minor Axis Moment kip-
33 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 14 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Section No. Elevation Component Type Condition Gov. Load Comb. Force Major Axis Moment kip- Minor Axis Moment kip- L Pole Max Tension 6 Max. Compression Max. Mx Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max. Torque L Pole Max Tension 1 Max. Compression Max. Mx Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max. Torque L Pole Max Tension 1 Max. Compression Max. Mx Max. My Max. Vy Max. Vx Max. Torque Location Condition Gov. Load Comb. Maximum Reactions Vertical Horizontal, X Horizontal, Z Pole Max. Vert Max. H x Max. H z Max. M x Max. M z Max. Torsion Min. Vert Min. H x Min. H z Min. M x Min. M z Min. Torsion Load Combination Vertical Tower Mast Reaction Summary Shear x Shear z Overturning Moment, M x kip- Overturning Moment, M z kip- kip- Dead Only Dead+Wind 0 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 30 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 45 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 60 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 90 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 120 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 135 deg - No Ice Torque
34 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 15 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Load Combination Vertical Shear x Shear z Overturning Moment, M x kip- Overturning Moment, M z kip- kip- Dead+Wind 150 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 180 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 210 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 225 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 240 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 270 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 300 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 315 deg - No Ice Dead+Wind 330 deg - No Ice Dead+Ice+Temp Dead+Wind 0 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 30 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 45 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 60 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 90 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 120 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 135 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 150 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 180 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 210 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 225 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 240 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 270 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 300 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 315 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 330 deg+ice+temp Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service Dead+Wind 30 deg - Service Dead+Wind 45 deg - Service Dead+Wind 60 deg - Service Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service Dead+Wind 120 deg - Service Dead+Wind 135 deg - Service Dead+Wind 150 deg - Service Dead+Wind 180 deg - Service Dead+Wind 210 deg - Service Dead+Wind 225 deg - Service Dead+Wind 240 deg - Service Dead+Wind 270 deg - Service Dead+Wind 300 deg - Service Dead+Wind 315 deg - Service Dead+Wind 330 deg - Service Torque Solution Summary Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reactions Load Comb. PX PY PZ PX PY PZ % Error % % % % % % % % % %
35 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 16 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reactions Load Comb. PX PY PZ PX PY PZ % Error % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Non-Linear Convergence Results Load Combination Converged? Number of Cycles Displacement Tolerance Force Tolerance 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
36 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 17 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL 12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Section No. Elevation Maximum Tower Deflections - Service Wind Horz. Deflection in Gov. Load Comb. Tilt Twist L L L Elevation Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Service Wind Appurtenance Gov. Load Comb. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Curvature in Falls Village Branch Site Pro RMV
37 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 18 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Load Comb. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Curvature in Site Pro RMV Site Pro RMV HPA-65R-BUU-H Site Pro RMV Site Pro RMV Site Pro RMV Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Section No. Elevation Maximum Tower Deflections - Design Wind Horz. Deflection in Gov. Load Comb. Tilt Twist L L L Elevation Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Design Wind Appurtenance Gov. Load Comb. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Curvature in Falls Village Branch Site Pro RMV Site Pro RMV Site Pro RMV HPA-65R-BUU-H Site Pro RMV Site Pro RMV Site Pro RMV Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Falls Village Branch Compression Checks
38 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 19 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Pole Design Data Section No. Elevation Size L L u L (1) TP37.69x25x L (2) TP48.45x35.823x L (3) TP58.5x46.033x l/r F a ksi A in 2 Actual P Allow. P a Ratio P P a Pole Bending Design Data Section No. Elevation Size Actual M x kip- Actual f bx ksi Allow. F bx ksi Ratio f bx F bx Actual M y kip- Actual f by ksi Allow. F by ksi Ratio f by F by L (1) TP37.69x25x L (2) TP48.45x35.823x L (3) TP58.5x46.033x Section No. Elevation Size Pole Shear Design Data Actual V Actual f v ksi L (1) TP37.69x25x L (2) TP48.45x35.823x L (3) TP58.5x46.033x Allow. F v ksi Ratio f v F v Actual T kip- Actual f vt ksi Allow. F vt ksi Ratio f vt F vt Pole Interaction Design Data Section No. Elevation Ratio P P a Ratio f bx F bx Ratio f by F by Ratio f v F v Ratio f vt F vt Comb. Stress Ratio Allow. Stress Ratio L (1) L (2) L (3) Criteria H1-3+VT H1-3+VT H1-3+VT Section Capacity Table
39 tnxtower Job CT2413 Page 20 of 20 Centek Engineering Inc North Branford Rd. Branford, CT Phone: (203) FAX: (203) Project Client 157- EEI Monopine Route 7, Canaan, CT AT&T Mobility Date 15:25:12 02/03/14 Designed by TJL Section No. Elevation Component Type Size Critical Element P SF*P allow % Capacity L Pole TP37.69x25x Pass L Pole TP48.45x35.823x Pass L Pole TP58.5x46.033x Pass Summary Pole (L2) 90.1 Pass RATING = 90.1 Pass Pass Fail Program Version /7/2011 File:J:/Jobs/ WI/04_Structural/Backup Documentation/Calcs/Rev (2)/ERI Files/157' Monopine_ Canaan, CT.eri
40 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Anchor Bolt and Baseplate Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Anchor Bolt and Base Plate Anal ysis: Input Data: Tower Reactions: Overturning Moment = OM 5423kips Shear Force = Shear 50kips Axial Force = Axial 50kips (Input From RisaTower) (Input From RisaTower) (Input From RisaTower) Anchor Bolt Data: Use ASTM A615 Grade 75 Number of Anchor Bolts = N 24 Diameter of Bolt Circle = D bc 66in Bolt "Column" Distance = l 3.0in Bolt Ultimate Strenght = F u 100ksi Bolt Yeild Strenght = F y 75ksi Bolt Modulus = E ksi Diameter of A nchor Bolts = D 2.25 in Threads per Inch = n 4.5 (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) Base Plate Data: Use ASTM A572 Grade 50 Plate Yield Strength = Fy bp 50ksi Base Plate Thickness = t bp 3.0in Base Plate Diameter = D bp 72in Outer Pole Diameter = D pole 58.5in (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) Anchor Bolt and Base Plate.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.2-1
41 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Anchor Bolt and Baseplate Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Geometric Layout Data: Distance from Bolts to Centroid of Pole: Radius of Bolt Circle =: R bc 2 D bc 33in Distance to Bolts = i 1 N i d 2! i d 8.54in d 31.88in N 1 7 d R bc sin ( ) d 16.50in d 28.58in 2 8 d 23.33in d 23.33in 3 9 d 28.58in d 16.50in 4 10 d 31.88in d 8.54in 5 11 d in etc. Critical Distances For Bending in Plate: D pole Outer Pole Radius = R pole in Moment Arms of Bolts about Neutral Axis = MA if d R i i pole d R i pole 0in MA 0.00in MA 2.63in 1 7 MA 0.00in MA 0.00in 2 8 MA 0.00in MA 0.00in 3 9 MA 0.00in MA 0.00in 4 10 MA 2.63in MA 0.00in 5 11 MA in etc Effective Width of Baseplate for Bending = B eff.82 D bp 2 2 D pole in Anchor Bolt and Base Plate.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.2-2
42 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Anchor Bolt and Baseplate Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Anchor Bolt Analysis: Calculated Anchor Bolt Properties: Polar Moment of Inertia = I p d i in 2 i! Gross Area of Bolt = A g 4 D in 2! in Net Area of Bolt = A n D 3.248in 2 4 n 2 A n Net Diameter = D n! 2.033in 2 Radius of Gyration of Bolt = r D n in 3! D n Section Modulus of Bolt = S x 32 Check Anchor Bolt Tension Force: 0.826in 3 R bc Maximum Tensile Force = T Max OM I p Axial N 162.3kips Allowable Tensile Force = T ALL.Gross A g F u T ALL.Net A n F y 174.9kips kips (1.333 increase allowed per TIA/EIA) (1.333 increase allowed per TIA/EIA) Bolt Tension % of Capacity = T Max 83.3 % T ALL.Net Bolts are "upset bolts". Use net area per AISC Condition1 = Condition1 if T Max 1.00 "O" "Overstressed" T ALL.Net Condition1 "O" Check Anchor Bolt Bending Stress: Shear Maximum Bending Moment = M x N l kips Maximum Bending Stress = f bx S x M x 7.6ksi Allowable Bending Stress = F bx F y 60ksi (1.333 increase allowed per TIA/EIA) Anchor Bolt and Base Plate.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.2-3
43 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Anchor Bolt and Baseplate Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Check Combined Stress Requirement: Per ASCE Manual 72: "If the clearance between the base plate and concrete does not exceed two times the bolt diameter a bending stress analysis of the bolts is NOT normally required. l l if l 2 D n 0 otherwise f bx f bx if l 2D n 0 in 0ksi 0 otherwise Check Anchor Bolt Compression/Combined Stress: R bc Maximum Compressive Force = C Max OM I p Axial N 166.4kips C Max Maximum Compressive Stress = f a A n 51.2ksi ! 2 E C c F y F a 1 l r 3 l 5 r 3 8C c 2 2 2C c F y 3 l r 3 8C c if l r C c 45ksi 12! 2 E 23 l 2 r if l r C c Allowable Compressive Stress = F a 1.333F a 60ksi (1.333 increase allowed per TIA/EIA) Combined Stress % of Capacity = f a F a f bx F bx 85.4 % f a f bx Condition 2 = Condition2 if F a 1.00 "O" "Overstressed" F bx Condition2 "O" Anchor Bolt and Base Plate.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.2-4
44 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Anchor Bolt and Baseplate Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Base Plate Analysis: OMd i Force from Bolts = C i I p Axial N C 44.6kips C 160.8kips 1 7 C 84.2kips C 144.4kips 2 8 C 118.3kips C 118.3kips 3 9 C 144.4kips C 84.2kips 4 10 C 160.8kips C 44.6kips 5 11 C kips etc. Maximum Bending Stress in Plate = f bp i 6CMA i i 2 B eff t bp 29.2ksi Allowable Bending Stress in Plate = F bp Fy bp 49.9ksi Plate Bending Stress % of Capacity = f bp 58.5 % F bp f bp Condition3 = Condition3 if 1.00 "Ok" "Overstressed" F bp Condition3 "Ok" Anchor Bolt and Base Plate.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.2-5
45 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Foundation Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Standard Monopole Foundation: Input Data: Tower Data Overturning Moment = OM 5423kips Shear Force = Shear 50kip Axial Force = Axial 50kip Tower Height = H t 157 (User Input from RISATower) (User Input from RISATower) (User Input from RISATower) (User Input) Footing Data: Overall Depth of Footing = D f 5.0 Length of Pier = L p 3.0 Extension of Pier Above Grade = L pag 1.0 Diameter of Pier = d p 7.0 Thickness of Footing = T f 3.0 Width of Footing = W f 30.0 (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) Anchor Bolt Data: Length of Anchor Bolt s = L st 72in Projection of Anchor Bolts Above Pier = A BP 12.0in Anchor Bolt Diameter = d anchor 2.25in Base Plate Bolt Circle = MP 66.0 in (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) Material Properties: Concrete Compressive Strength = f c 4000psi Steel Reinforcment Yield Strength = f y psi Anchor Bolt Yield Strength = f ya 75000psi Internal Friction Angle of Soil = s 34deg Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity = q s 5000psf Unit Weight of Soil =! soil 120pcf Unit Weight of Concrete =! conc 150pcf (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) Foundation Bouyancy = Bouyancy 0 (User Input) (Yes=1 / No=0) Depth to Neglect = n 0 (User Input) Cohesion of Clay Type Soil = c 0 ksf (User Input) (Use 0 for Sandy Soil) Seismic Zone Factor = Z 2 (User Input) (UBC-1997 Fig 23-2) Coefficient of Friction Between Concrete = " 0.45 (User Input) Standard Monopole Foundation.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.3-1
46 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Foundation Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Pier Reinforcement: Bar Size = BS pier 8 Bar Diameter = d bpier 1.0in Number of Bars = NB pier 53 Clear Cover of Reinforcement = Cvr pier 3in (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) (User Input) Reinforcement Location Factor = # pier 1.0 (User Input) (ACI ) Coating Factor = $ pier 1.0 (User Input) (ACI ) Concrete Strength Factor = % pier 1.0 (User Input) (ACI ) Reinforcement Size Factor =! pier 1.0 (User Input) (ACI ) Diameter of Tie = d Tie 0.5in (User Input) Pad Reinforcement: Bar Size = BS top 7 (User Input) (Top of Pad) Bar Diameter = d btop 0.875in (User Input) (Top of Pad) Number of Bars = NB top 46 (User Input) (Top of Pad) Bar Size = BS bot 7 (User Input) (Bottom of Pad) Bar Diameter = d bbot 0.875in (User Input) (Bottom of Pad) Number of Bars = NB bot 90 (User Input) (Bottom of Pad) Clear Cover of Reinforcement = Cvr pad 3.0in (User Input) Reinforcement Location Factor = # pad 1.0 (User Input) (ACI ) Coating Factor = $ pad 1.0 (User Input) (ACI ) Concrete Strength Factor = % pad 1.0 (User Input) (ACI ) Reinforcement Size Factor =! pad 1.0 (User Input) (ACI ) Calculated Factors: 2 & d bpier Pier Reinforcement Bar Area = A bpier A btop A bbot 4 4 Pad Top Reinforcement Bar Area = 2 & d btop 4 Pad Bottom Reinforcement Bar Area = 2 & d bbot 1 sin s Coefficient of Lateral Soil Pressure = p 1 sin s 0.785in in in Load Factor = LF if H t if H t H t otherwise Standard Monopole Foundation.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.3-2
47 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Foundation Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Stability of Footing: Adjusted Concrete Unit Weight =! c ifbouyancy = 1! conc 62.4pcf! conc 150pcf Adjusted Soil Unit Weight =! s ifbouyancy = 1! soil 62.4pcf! soil 120pcf Passive Pressure = P pn p! s n c2 p 0ksf P pt p! s D f T f c 2 p P top if n D f T f P pt P pn P bot p! s D f c2 p P top P bot P ave ksf T p if n D f T f T f D f n A p 0.849ksf 0.849ksf 2.122ksf 3 W f T p 90 Ultimate Shear = S u P ave A p kip 2 Weight of Concrete Pad = WT c W f Tf 2 d p Lp! c kip Weight of Soil Above Footing = 2 2 WT s1 W f d p L p L pag n if L p L pag n 0 0 if L p L pag n 0! s kip 2 D f tan s Weight of Soil Wedge at Back Face = WT s2 W 2 f! s Weight of Soil Wedge at back face Corners = WT s3 2 D f 3 tan s 3! s kip 6.745kips Total Weight = WT tot WT c WT s1 Axial kip D f tan s W f Resisting Moment = M r WT tot W f T f S 2 u WT 3 s2 WT s3 Overturning Moment = M ot OM Shear L p T f 5723kip kip Factor of Safety Actual = FS M r 2.01 M ot Factor of Safety Required = FS req 2 OverTurning_Moment_Check if FS FS req "Okay" "No Good" OverTurning_Moment_Check "Okay" Standard Monopole Foundation.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.3-3
48 Subject: Location: Rev. 2: 2/03/14 Foundation Analysis 157- EEI Monopine Canaan, CT Prepared by: T.J.L. Checked by: C.F.C. Job No Shear Capacity in Pier: " WT tot Shear Resistance of Pier = S p FS req Bearing Pressure Caused by Footing: kips Shear_Check if S p Shear "Okay" "No Good" Shear_Check "Okay" 2 Area of the Mat = A mat W f 900 Section Modulus of Mat = 3 W f S WT c Axial Maximum Pressure in Mat = P max A mat M ot S 1.802ksf Max_Pressure_Check if P max q s "Okay" "No Good" Max_Pressure_Check "Okay" WT c Axial Minimum Pressure in Mat = P min A mat M ot S ksf P min q s Min_Pressure_Check if P min 0 Min_Pressure_Check "No Good" "Okay" "No Good" Distance to Resultant of Pressure Distribution = X p P max P min P max W f W f Distance to ern = X k 5 6 Since Resultant Force is Not in ern, Area to which Pressure is Applied Must be Reduced. Eccentricity = e M ot 8.4 WT tot 2 WT c Axial Adjusted Soil Pressure = P a W f 3W f e ksf q adj ifp min 0P a P max 1.606ksf Pressure_Check if q adj q s "Okay" "No Good" Pressure_Check "Okay" Standard Monopole Foundation.xmcd.xmcd Page 3.3-4
49 Section 1 - RFDS GENERAL INFORMATION 2/3/2013 RF DESIGN ENG: s2413 Radu Alecsandru RFDS NAME: DATE: RF PERF ENG: ISSUE: Approved? RF PERF PHONE: Pre-construction Y RF DESIGN PHONE: [email protected] (Y/N) REVISION: RF MANAGER: RF PERF V04 Cameron Syme RF DESIGN TRIDENT: GSM FREQUENCY: Pre-construction RFDS for leasing and zoning purposes, general design. It is not the finalized location, CL and azimuths. RRU positioning may be UMTS FREQUENCY: INITIATIVE / PROJECT: different based on the structural analysis. LTE FREQUENCY: I-PLAN JOB NUMBER: Section 2 - LOCATION INFORMATION FA LOCATION CODE: Canaan - Route 7 South USID: LOCATION NAME: ORACLE PROJECT #: REGION: MARET: SEARCH RING NAME: NE MARET CLUSTER: CT NER Canaan - Route 7 South Route CITY: Canaan CT s2413 ADDRESS:. STATE: SEARCH RING ID: South COUNTY: ZIP CODE: MSA/RSA: BTA: 41 56'40.4"N LONGITUDE (D-M-S): 73 21'37.7"W LATITUDE (D-M-S): LAT (DEC. DEG.): LONG (DEC. DEG.): BORDER CELL WITH 0 0 CONTOUR COORD: DIRECTIONS, ACCESS AND AM STUDY REQ'D EQUIPMENT LOCATION: (Y/N): FREQ COORD: Section 3 - LICENSE COVERAGE/FILING INFORMATION CGSA - NO FILING TRIGGERED: CGSA LOSS: PCS REDUCED - UPS ZIP: CGSA - MINOR FILING NEEDED: CGSA EXT AGMT NEEDED: PCS POPS REDUCED: CGSA - MAJOR FILING NEEDED: CGSA SCORECARD UPDATED: Section 4 - TOWER/REGULATORY INFORMATION STRUCTURE AT&T OWNED?: GROUND ELEVATION: STRUCTURE TYPE: MARET LOCATION 850 MHZ CALL SIGN(S): ADDTIONAL REGULATORY?: HEIGHT OVERALL: FCC ASR NUMBER: MARET LOCATION 1900 MHZ CALL SIGN(S): SUB-LEASE RIGHTS?: STRUCTURE HEIGHT: MARET LOCATION 700 MHZ CALL SIGN(S): LIGHTING TYPE: MARET LOCATION AWS MHZ CALL SIGN(S): Section 5 - E-911 INFORMATION PSAP NAME: PSAP ID: E911 PHASE: MPC SVC PROVIDER: LMU REQUIRED: ESRN: DATE LIVE PH1: DATE LIVE PH2: ALPHA BETA GAMMA DELTA EPSILON PSI Section 6 - RBS GENERAL INFORMATION 4-DIGIT SITE ID: s2413 COW OR TOY?: No CELLULAR NETWOR: DISASTER PRIORITY: CELL SITE TYPE: Sectorized SITE TYPE: OPS DISTRICT: OPS ZONE: BTS LOCATION ID: ORIGINATING CO: RF DISTRICT: RF ZONE: Section 7 - RBS SPECIFIC INFORMATION GSM RBSs UMTS 1ST CARRIER RBSs UMTS 2ND CARRIER RBSs UMTS 3RD CARRIER RBSs UMTS 4TH CARRIER RBSs LTE RBSs MSC BSC/RNC LAC RAC EQUIPMENT VENDOR EQUIPMENT TYPE LOCATION CABINET LOCATION Section 8 - RBS INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION GSM 850 RBS GSM 1900 RBS UMTS 850 RBS UMTS 1900 RBS UMTS 2ND 850 RBS UMTS 2ND 1900 RBS UMTS 3RD 850 RBS UMTS 3RD 1900 RBS UMTS 4TH 850 RBS UMTS 4TH 1900 RBS LTE 700 RBS LTE AWS RBS CELL ID/BCF CTS COMMON ID Section 9 - SOFT SECTOR ID GSM 850 RBS GSM 1900 RBS UMTS 850 RBS UMTS 1900 RBS UMTS 2ND 850 RBS UMTS 2ND 1900 RBS UMTS 3RD 850 RBS UMTS 3RD 1900 RBS UMTS 4TH 850 RBS UMTS 4TH 1900 RBS LTE 700 RBS LTE AWS RBS ALPHA (OR OMNI) BETA GAMMA DELTA EPSILON PSI Section 10 - CID/SAC GSM 850 RBS GSM 1900 RBS UMTS 850 RBS UMTS 1900 RBS UMTS 2ND 850 RBS UMTS 2ND 1900 RBS UMTS 3RD 850 RBS UMTS 3RD 1900 RBS UMTS 4TH 850 RBS UMTS 4TH 1900 RBS LTE 700 RBS LTE AWS RBS ALPHA (OR OMNI) BETA GAMMA DELTA EPSILON PSI Section 11 - CURRENT RADIO COUNTS (Existing) GSM 850 RBS GSM 1900 RBS UMTS 850 RBS UMTS 1900 RBS UMTS 2ND 850 RBS UMTS 2ND 1900 RBS UMTS 3RD 850 RBS UMTS 3RD 1900 RBS UMTS 4TH 850 RBS UMTS 4TH 1900 RBS LTE 700 RBS LTE AWS RBS ALPHA (OR OMNI) BETA GAMMA DELTA EPSILON PSI Section 12 - CURRENT T1 COUNTS (Existing) GSM 1st Cabinet GSM 2nd Cabinet UMTS 1st Cabinet UMTS 2nd Cabinet LTE 1st Cabinet LTE 2nd Cabinet # T1s LIN PROFILE FIBER or ETHERNET? Tx Board Model Tx Board QTY RAX/ECU Board Model RAX/ECU Board QTY BBU Board Model BBU Board QTY RRU - location Section 13 - NEW/PROPOSED RADIO COUNTS GSM 850 RBS GSM 1900 RBS UMTS 850 RBS UMTS 1900 RBS UMTS 2ND 850 RBS UMTS 2ND 1900 RBS UMTS 3RD 850 RBS UMTS 3RD 1900 RBS UMTS 4TH 850 RBS UMTS 4TH 1900 RBS LTE 700 RBS LTE AWS RBS ALPHA (OR OMNI) BETA GAMMA DELTA EPSILON PSI Section 14 - NEW/PROPOSED T1 COUNTS GSM 1st Cabinet GSM 2nd Cabinet UMTS 1st Cabinet UMTS 2nd Cabinet LTE 1st Cabinet LTE 2nd Cabinet # T1s LIN PROFILE FIBER or ETHERNET? Tx Board Model Tx Board QTY RAX/ECU Board Model RAX/ECU Board QTY BBU Board Model BBU Board QTY RRU - location
50 Section 15A - CURRENT SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - ALPHA (OR OMNI) ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TECHNOLOGY FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) ANTENNA 1 ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA 5 ANTENNA MAE - MODEL ANTENNA VENDOR ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) TMA/LNA (TYPE/MODEL) CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE ANTENNA SHARING IT? BAS Filter DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) 1900 PDU FOR TMAS ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TECHNOLOGY FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) ANTENNA MAE - MODEL ANTENNA VENDOR ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) ANTENNA 1 Section 15B - CURRENT SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - BETA ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA 5 TMA/LNA (TYPE/MODEL) CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE ANTENNA SHARING IT? BAS Filter DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) 1900 PDU FOR TMAS ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TECHNOLOGY FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) ANTENNA MAE - MODEL ANTENNA VENDOR ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) Section 15C - CURRENT SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - GAMMA ANTENNA 1 ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA 5 TMA/LNA (TYPE/MODEL) CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE ANTENNA SHARING IT? BAS Filter DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) 1900 PDU FOR TMAS
51 Section 15D - CURRENT SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - DELTA ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TECHNOLOGY FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) ANTENNA 1 ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA 5 ANTENNA MAE - MODEL ANTENNA VENDOR ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) TMA/LNA (TYPE/MODEL) CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE ANTENNA SHARING IT? BAS Filter DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) 1900 PDU FOR TMAS ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TECHNOLOGY FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) ANTENNA MAE - MODEL ANTENNA VENDOR ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) Section 15E - CURRENT SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - EPSILON ANTENNA 1 ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA 5 TMA/LNA (TYPE/MODEL) CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE ANTENNA SHARING IT? BAS Filter DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) 1900 PDU FOR TMAS ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TECHNOLOGY FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) ANTENNA MAE - MODEL ANTENNA VENDOR ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) ANTENNA 1 Section 15F - CURRENT SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - ZETA ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA 5 TMA/LNA (TYPE/MODEL) CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE ANTENNA SHARING IT? BAS Filter DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) 1900 PDU FOR TMAS
52 Section 16A - NEW/PROPOSED SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - ALPHA (OR OMNI) ANTENNA 1 ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TECHNOLOGY UMTS-DB LTE-DB LTE-DB FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site ANTENNA MAE - MODEL HPA-65R-BUU-H8 OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 ANTENNA VENDOR CCI CCI CCI ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" 93 x 15 x 7 93 x 15 x 7 93 x 15 x 7 ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN 17.4 dbi (high band) 17.4 dbi (high band) 17.4 dbi (high band) AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER ' 140 ' ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT 144 ' 144 ' 144 ' MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) 850 RRUS11/700 RRUS-E2/WCS RRUS32/AWS RRH 850 RRUS11/1900 RRUS12/1900 RRUS-A2 700 RRUS11/1900 RRUS12/1900 RRUS-A2 RRUS12/AWS RRUS-A2 CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA n/a n/a n/a CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE n/a n/a n/a ANTENNA SHARING IT? n/a n/a n/a BAS Filter n/a n/a n/a DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) n/a aleus DBC0062F1Vxx-1 x2 n/a DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) n/a n/a n/a SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) SQUID x 4 per site SQUID x 4 per site SQUID x 4 per site DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) n/a n/a n/a RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) Home Run RET cable n/a n/a 1900 PDU FOR TMAS CCU - athrein n/a n/a Section 16B - NEW/PROPOSED SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - BETA ANTENNA 1 ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TECHNOLOGY UMTS-DB LTE-DB LTE-DB FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site ANTENNA MAE - MODEL HPA-65R-BUU-H8 OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 ANTENNA VENDOR CCI CCI CCI ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" 93 x 15 x 7 93 x 15 x 7 93 x 15 x 7 ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN 17.4 dbi (high band) 17.4 dbi (high band) 17.4 dbi (high band) AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER 140 ' 140 ' 140 ' ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT 144 ' 144 ' 144 ' MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) 850 RRUS11/700 RRUS-E2/WCS RRUS32/AWS RRH 850 RRUS11/1900 RRUS12/1900 RRUS-A2 700 RRUS11/1900 RRUS12/1900 RRUS-A2 RRUS12/AWS RRUS-A2 CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA n/a n/a n/a CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE n/a n/a n/a ANTENNA SHARING IT? n/a n/a n/a BAS Filter n/a n/a n/a DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) n/a aleus DBC0062F1Vxx-1 x2 n/a DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) n/a n/a n/a SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) SQUID x 4 per site SQUID x 4 per site SQUID x 4 per site DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) n/a n/a n/a RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) Home Run RET cable n/a n/a 1900 PDU FOR TMAS CCU - athrein n/a n/a Section 16C - NEW/PROPOSED SECTOR/CELL INFORMATION - GAMMA ANTENNA 1 ANTENNA 2 ANTENNA 3 ANTENNA 4 ANTENNA CONFIG (FROM BAC): TX/RX? TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TECHNOLOGY UMTS-DB LTE-DB LTE-DB FEEDERS ( # /TYPE/LENGTH) 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site 2 Optic Fiber w 8 DC lines per site ANTENNA MAE - MODEL HPA-65R-BUU-H8 OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 HPA-65R-BUU-H8 ANTENNA VENDOR CCI CCI CCI ANTENNA SIZE H"xW"xD" 93 x 15 x 7 93 x 15 x 7 93 x 15 x 7 ANTENNA WEIGHT ANTENNA GAIN 17.4 dbi (high band) 17.4 dbi (high band) 17.4 dbi (high band) AZIMUTH RADIATION CENTER 140 ' 140 ' 140 ' ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT 144 ' 144 ' 144 ' MAGNETIC DECLINATION ELECTRICAL TILT (700/850/1900/AWS) MECHANICAL DOWNTILT SCPA/MCPA? MCPA MODULES HATCHPLATE POWER (Watts) ERP (Watts) NARROW BAND LLC (QTY/MODEL) HYBRID COMBINER (QTY/MODEL ) 850 RRUS11/700 RRUS-E2/WCS RRUS32/AWS RRH 850 RRUS11/1900 RRUS12/1900 RRUS-A2 700 RRUS11/1900 RRUS12/1900 RRUS-A2 RRUS12/AWS RRUS-A2 CURRENT INJECTORS FOR TMA n/a n/a n/a CURRENT INJCTR POWER CABLE n/a n/a n/a ANTENNA SHARING IT? n/a n/a n/a BAS Filter n/a n/a n/a DIPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) n/a aleus DBC0062F1Vxx-1 x2 n/a DUPLEXER (QTY/MODEL) n/a n/a n/a SURGE ARRESTOR (QTY/MODEL) SQUID x 4 per site SQUID x 4 per site SQUID x 4 per site DC BLOC (QTY/MODEL) n/a n/a n/a RET EQUIPMENT (QTY/MODEL) Home Run RET cable n/a n/a 1900 PDU FOR TMAS CCU - athrein n/a n/a ANTENNA 5 ANTENNA 5 ANTENNA 5
53 HPA Antenna Series HEXPORT Multi-Band ANTENNA Model HPA-65R-BUU-H6 The CCI Hexport Multi-Band Antenna Array is an industry first 6-port antenna with full WCS Band Coverage. With four high band ports and two low band ports, our hexport antenna is ready for 4X4 high band MIMO. Modern networks demand high performance, consequently CCI has incorporated several new and innovative design techniques to provide an antenna with excellent side-lobe performance, sharp elevation beams, and high front to back ratio. Multiple networks can now be connected to a single antenna, reducing tower loading and leasing expense, while decreasing deployment time and installation cost. Full band capability for 700 MHz, Cellular 850 MHz, PCS 1900 MHz, AWS 1710/2170 MHz and WCS 2300 MHz coverage in a single enclosure. Hexport Multi-Band Antenna Array Benefits Includes WCS Band Reduces tower loading Frees up space for tower mounted E-nodes Single radome with six ports All Band design simplifies radio assignments Sharp elevation beam eases network planning Features High Band Ports include WCS Band Four High Band ports with two Low Band ports in one antenna Sharp elevation beam Excellent elevation side-lobe performance Excellent MIMO performance due to array spacing Excellent PIM Performance A multi-network solution in one radome Applications 4x4 MIMO on High Band and 2x2 MIMO on Low Band Adding additional capacity without adding additional antennas Adding WCS Band without increasing antenna count Extending Wireless Performance 3/20/2013 Page 1 Revision 1.0
54 HPA Antenna Series HEXPORT Multi-Band ANTENNA Model HPA-65R-BUU-H6 HPA-65R Multi-Band Antenna Electrical Specifications Frequency Range Mechanical Specifications Dimensions (LxWxD) Survival Wind Speed Front Wind Load Side Wind Load 72.0 x 14.8 x 9.0 inches (1828 x 376 x 229 mm) > 150 mph Equivalent Flat Plate Area (0.90 m 2 ) Weight (without Mounting) RET System Weight Connector Mounting Pole 247 lbs ( mph (161 kph) 165 lbs ( mph (161 kph) 51 lbs (23 kg) 5.0 lbs (2.3 kg) 2 X Low Band Ports which cover the full range from MHz 6; 7-16 DIN female long neck 2-5 inches (5-12 cm) MHz MHz MHz 4 X High Band Ports which cover the full range from MHz / MHz MHz Gain 14.1 dbi 14.8 dbi 16.9 dbi 16.3 dbi 17.2 dbi 17.4 dbi Azimuth Beamwidth (-3dB) Elevation Beamwidth (-3dB) Electrical Downtilt 0 to 10 0 to 10 0 to 8 0 to 8 0 to 8 0 to 8 Elevation Sidelobes (1st Upper) < -17 db < -19 db < -19 db < -18 db < -18 db < -17 db Front-to-Back > 30 db > 30 db > 30 db > 30 db > 30 db > 30 db Front-to-Back Ratio over ± 20 > 30 db > 30 db > 30 db > 30 db > 30 db > 30 db Cross-Polar Discrimination (at Peak) > 25 db > 20 db > 25 db > 25 db > 25 db > 25 db Cross-Polar Discrimination (at ± 60 ) > 17 db > 14 db > 17 db > 17 db > 17 db > 17 db Cross-Polar Port-to-Port Isolation > 25 db > 25 db > 26 db > 25 db > 26 db > 26 db VSWR < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 Passive Intermodulation (2x20W) -150dBc -150dBc -150dBc -150dBc -150dBc -150dBc Input Power 500 Watts CW 500 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW Polarization Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Input Impedance 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms Lightning Protection DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground H1 +45 H1-45 L +45 L -45 H2 +45 H2-45 Antenna Patterns* Bottom View Rear View 894 MHz Azimuth Elevation MHz Azimuth Elevation 4 *Typical antenna patterns. For detail information on antenna pattern, please contact us at [email protected]. All specifications are subject to change without notice. USA HQ: 89 Leuning Street, South Hackensack, NJ Telephone: , Canada: 411 Legget Drive, Suite 104, Ottawa, ON, Canada 2 3C9 Telephone: /20/2013 Page 2 Revision 1.0
55 OPA Antenna Series 65 OCTOPORT MULTI-BAND ANTENNA Model OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 The CCI Octoport Multi-Band Antenna Array is an industry first 8-port antenna with full WCS Band Coverage. With four high band ports covering PCS, AWS and WCS bands, two 700 MHZ ports, and two 850 MHz ports our octoport antenna is ready for 4X4 high band MIMO. Modern networks demand high performance, consequently CCI has incorporated several new and innovative design techniques to provide an antenna with excellent side-lobe performance, sharp elevation beams, and high front to back ratio. Multiple networks can now be connected to a single antenna, reducing tower loading and leasing expense, while decreasing deployment time and installation cost. Full band capability for 700 MHz, Cellular 850 MHz, PCS 1900 MHz, AWS 1710/2155 MHz and WCS 2300 MHz coverage in a single enclosure. Octoport Multi-Band Antenna Array Benefits RET System allows Independent Tilt of each band specific paired port Reduces tower loading Frees up space for tower mounted Remote Radio Heads Single radome with eight ports All Band design simplifies radio assignments Sharp elevation beam eases network planning All CCI antennas are manufactured under ISO Features High Band Ports include WCS Band Four High Band ports with four Low Band ports in one antenna Sharp elevation beam Excellent elevation side-lobe performance Excellent MIMO performance due to array spacing Excellent PIM Performance A multi-network solution in one radome Applications 4x4 MIMO on High Band and Dual 2x2 MIMO on 700 & 850 Low Bands Adding additional capacity without adding additional antennas Adding WCS Band without increasing antenna count Extending Wireless Performance 1/13/2013 Page 1 Revision 1.3
56 OPA Antenna Series 65 OCTOPORT MULTI-BAND ANTENNA Model OPA-65R-LCUU-H8 OPA-65R Multi-Band Antenna Electrical Specifications Frequency Range 2 X Low Band Ports (L) which cover the range from MHz 2 X Low Band Ports (C) which cover the range from MHz 4 X High Band Ports (H1 & H2) which cover the full range from MHz MHz / MHz MHz Gain 14.7 dbi 15.5 dbi 17.0 dbi 16.5 dbi 17.2 dbi 17.1 dbi Azimuth Beamwidth (-3dB) Elevation Beamwidth (-3dB) Electrical Downtilt 2 to 10 2 to 10 0 to 8 0 to 8 0 to 8 0 to 8 Elevation Sidelobes (1st Upper) < -17 db < -17 db < -19 db < -18 db < -18 db < -17 db Front-to-Back > 28 db > 28 db > 35 db > 35 db > 35 db > 35 db Front-to-Back Ratio over ± 20 > 28 db > 27 db > 28 db > 27 db > 27 db > 28 db Cross-Polar Discrimination (at Peak) > 24 db > 20 db > 25 db > 25 db > 25 db > 25 db Cross-Polar Discrimination (at ± 60 ) > 16 db > 14 db > 18 db > 18 db > 18 db > 18 db Cross-Polar Port-to-Port Isolation > 25 db > 25 db > 25 db > 25 db > 25 db > 25 db VSWR < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 < 1.5:1 Passive Intermodulation (2x20W) -150 dbc -150 dbc -150 dbc -150 dbc -150 dbc -150 dbc Input Power 500 Watts CW 500 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW 300 Watts CW Polarization Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Dual Pol 45 Input Impedance 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms 50 Ohms Lightning Protection DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground Mechanical Specifications Dimensions (LxWxD) 92.7 x 14.4 x 7.0 inches (2355 x 366 x 179 mm) Survival Wind Speed > 150 mph Front Wind Load 327 lbs ( mph (161 kph) Side Wind Load 186 lbs ( mph (161 kph) Equivalent Flat Plate Area (1.2 m 2 ) Weight (w/o RET/Mounting) 88 lbs (40 kg) RET System Weight 7.0 lbs (3.0 kg) Connector 8; 7-16 DIN female long neck Mounting Pole 2-5 inches (5-12 cm) Antenna Patterns* Bottom View Rear View 737 MHz Azimuth 887 MHz Azimuth Elevation MHz Azimuth Elevation 4 *Typical antenna patterns. For detail information on antenna pattern, please contact us at [email protected]. All specifications are subject to change without notice. USA HQ: 89 Leuning Street, South Hackensack, NJ Telephone: , Canada: 411 Legget Drive, Suite 104, Ottawa, ON, Canada 2 3C9 Telephone: /13/2013 Page 2 Revision 1.3
57 DBC0062F1Vxx / DUAL BAND COMBINER aelus world-proven outdoor solutions provide strong RF performance coupled with rugged operation. The DBC0062 provides the following features: PRODUCT FEATURES - Enables feeder sharing of various technologies including PCS/WCS, AWS/WCS, 1800/2300TDD and 2100/ Field configurable DC switch. - low insertion loss and high isolation - Low passive IM performance TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANNEL Passband MHz Insertion loss 0.15dB typ Return loss 18dB min Attenuation: MHz 50dB min Maximum input power 200W (avg) / 2kW (PEP) CHANNEL Passband MHz Insertion loss 0.15dB typ Return loss 18dB min Attenuation: MHz 50dB min Maximum input power 200W (avg) / 2kW (PEP) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS Impedance Intermodulation products 50Ohms -153dBc max all ports with 2 x 20W carriers 2013 aelus. All Rights Reserved. DBC0062F1VX-1 ISSUE D.DOC
58 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONTINUED DC/AISG A field selectable DC/AISG path is achieved via mechanical links on a IEC , 8-pin female connector (see mechanical diagram). It is aelus s recommendation that due to AISG link budget reasons that a maximum of 2 DC/AISG paths are activated simultaneously without active repeating of the AISG signal Passband 0 3MHz Insertion loss Return loss Insertion loss Return loss Input voltage range DC current rating 1dB max single DC/AISG pass 12dB min single DC/AISG pass 4.5dB typical two DC/AISG pass 9dB typical two DC/AISG pass ± 31V 2A continuous, 4A peak ENVIRONMENTAL For further details of environmental compliance, please contact aelus. Operating temperature range -20ºC to +65ºC -4 F to 149 F Ingress protection IP67 Lightning protection RF port: ±5kA max (8/20us), IEC MTBF >1,000,000 hours Compliance ETSI EN class 4.1, RoHS MECHANICAL Dimensions H x D x W Weight, (kg lb) Finish Connectors Mounting 246 x 223 x 66mm / 9.7 x 8.8 x 2.6in 3kg 6.6lbs estimated Painted, light grey (RAL7035) RF: DIN 7-16 (F) x 6 long neck Pole/wall bracket supplied with two metal clamps for mm diameter poles ORDERING INFORMATION aelus Part Number DBC0062F1V51-1 DBC0062F1V1-1 DBC0062F1V2-1 DBC0062F1Vxx-1 aelus Description / dual band combiner, twin unit, With DC switch / dual band combiner, twin unit, No DC through / dual band combiner, twin unit DC/AISG path from common to port only Various DC/AISG configuration available 2013 aelus. All Rights Reserved. DBC0062F1VX-1 ISSUE D.DOC
59 Frequency (AT&T) Band 12 (Lower 700 MHz) Band 4 (AWS, 17/2100 MHz) 2Q2011 RF Characteristics Output power: 2x30 Watts 2x2 MIMO Capable IBW of 20 MHz Rx Sens.: Better than -105 dbm (5 MHz) RET/TMA Support AISG 2.0 Compatible Via RET Port and Centre Conductor Cascading 30 VDC Bias Environmental Self Convection Temperature -40 to 131 F Power Input voltage: -48 VDC or AC (exemption) Fuse size: A Recommended: 25 A Power Consumption: Typical 200 Watts Max 310 Watts Excl. RET and TMA load 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Ericsson Inc. 2010, all rights reserved. Proprietary and Confidential under NDA Page 26
60 RRUS 11 Mechanics Wall and pole mounting brackets Reused from RRUW and RRU22 Vertical Mount Only Clearing distances: Above >= 16 in. Below >= 12 in. Side >= 0 mm DC connector Bayonet Screw terminals in connector plug Supported outer cable diameter: 6-18 mm CPRI connector LCD with proprietary cover Separate cover available from 1Q2011 Size & Weight Band 4: 44 lbs Band 12: 50 lbs 17.8 x 17.3 x 7.2 incl. sun shield 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property.
61 DC F DC Surge Suppression Solution The DC is a dual chambered, DC surge suppression system for use in multi-circuit, Distributed Antenna Systems. The system will protect up to 6 Remote Radio Heads from voltage surges and lightning, and connect up to 18 fiber pairs. The system is enclosed in a NEMA 4 rated, waterproof enclosure. FEATURES Protects up to 6 Remote Radio Heads, each with its own protection circuit. Flexible design allows for installation at the top of a tower for Remote Radio Head protection. Includes fiber connections for up to 18 pairs of fiber. LED indicators on individual circuits provide visual indication of suppressor status. Form C relays allow for remote monitoring of the suppressor status. Patented Strikesorb technology provides over 60 ka of surge current capacity per circuit. Strikesorb suppression modules are fully recognized to UL rd Edition Safety Standard, meeting all intermediate and high current fault requirements to facilitate use in OEM applications. Raycap recommends that DC protection system be installed within 2 meters or 6 feet of the radio. Dome design is lightweight and aerodynamic providing maximum flexibility for installation on top of towers. Phone Toll Free Fax
62 DC F DC Power Surge Protection Electrical Specifications Model Number Nominal Operating Voltage DC F 48 VDC Nominal Discharge Current (I n ) 20 ka 8/20 µs Maximum Discharge Current (I max ) per NEMA LS-1 60 ka 8/20 µs Maximum Continuous Operating Voltage (U c ) Voltage Protection Rating 75 VDC 400 V Mechanical Specifications Suppression Connection Method Fiber Connection Method Environmental Rating Operating Temperature Storage Temperature Cold Temperature Cycling Resistance to Aggressive Materials UV Protection Weight Compression lug, #2-#14 AWG Copper, #2-#12 Aluminum LC-LC Single mode duplex IP 68, 7m 72hrs -40 C to + 80 C -70 C to + 80 C IEC e -30 C to + 60 C psi CEI IEC including acids and bases ISO Method A Xenon-Arc 2160 hrs 20 lbs without Mounting Bracket STANDARDS Strikesorb modules are compliant to the following Surge Protection Device (SPD) Standards: ANSI/UL rd Edition IEEE C62.41 NEMA LS-1, IEC :2005 2nd Edition:2005 IEC EN :2002 (including A11:2007) GS-07F-0435V G REV Raycap, Inc. 806 W. Clearwater Loop Post Falls Idaho USA Phone Toll Free Fax
63
64 Product Specifications PWRT-212-S Remote Radio Head Power Cable, 2 conductor with shield, 12 AWG (3.31 mm2) Cross Section Drawing Construction Materials Construction Type Non-armored Conductor Material Tinned copper Dielectric Material PVC Drain Wire Material Tinned copper Filler Material Polypropylene Ground Wire Material Tinned copper Insulation Material, singles PVC Jacket Material PVC Outer Shield (Braid) Coverage 65 % Outer Shield (Braid) Gauge 36 AWG Outer Shield (Braid) Material Tinned copper Outer Shield (Tape) Material Aluminum/Poly, non-bonded Dimensions Cable Weight 0.16 kg/m 0.11 lb/ Diameter Over Conductor, singles mm per 65 strand in per 65 strand Diameter Over Dielectric Diameter Over Drain Wire Diameter Over Ground Wire Diameter Over Jacket mm in mm per 7 strand in per 7 strand mm in mm in 2013 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks identified by or are registered trademarks, respectively, of CommScope. All specifications are subject to change without notice. See for the most current information. Revised: August 8, 2013 page 1 of 2 September 20, 2013
65 Product Specifications PWRT-212-S Diameter Over Shield (Braid) Jacket Thickness mm in mm in Electrical Specifications Conductor dc Resistance Conductor dc Resistance Note Safety Voltage Rating 1.68 ohms/k 5.51 ohms/km Maximum value based on a standard condition of 20 C (68 F) 600 V Environmental Specifications Environmental Space Operating Temperature Safety Standard UV resistant for outdoor and/or direct burial installations -40 C to +90 C (-40 F to +194 F) NEC Article 336 (Type TC) General Specifications Application Industrial Cable Type Power Jacket Color Black Conductor Gauge, singles 12 AWG Conductor Type, singles Stranded Conductors, quantity 2 Drain Wire Gauge 16 AWG Ground Wire Gauge 12 AWG Ground Wire Type Stranded Jacket Color, singles Black Red Regulatory Compliance/Certifications Agency Classification ISO 9001:2008 Designed, manufactured and/or distributed under this quality management system 2013 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks identified by or are registered trademarks, respectively, of CommScope. All specifications are subject to change without notice. See for the most current information. Revised: August 8, 2013 page 2 of 2 September 20, 2013
66 A B DETAIL A ITEM QTY PART NO. X-LWRM G58R-24 G58R-48 X-SV A58234 A58FW G58LW A58NUT X-UB5458 G58FW G58NUT X-UB1306 G12NUT G12FW G12LW X-UB1212 P3150 A X-SP219 X-SP216 PARTS LIST PART DESCRIPTION RING MOUNT WELDMENT 5/8" x 24" THREADED ROD (HDG.) 5/8" X 48" GALV THREADED ROD SUPPORT ARM WELDMENT - 36" 5/8'' x 2-3/4" HDG A325 HEX BOLT 5/8" HDG A325 FLATWASHER 5/8" HDG LOCWASHER 5/8'' HDG A325 HEX NUT 5/8" X 4-5/8" X 7" X 3' U-BOLT (HDG.) 5/8" HDG USS FLATWASHER 5/8'' HDG HEAVY 2H HEX NUT 1/2" X 3-5/8" X 6" X 3" U-BOLT (HDG.) 1/2'' HDG HEAVY 2H HEX NUT 1/2" HDG USS FLATWASHER 1/2" HDG LOCWASHER 1/2" X 2-1/2" X 4-1/2" X 2" U-BOLT (HDG.) 3-1/2" X 150" SCH 40 GALVANIZED PIPE B SMALL SUPPORT CROSS PLATE LARGE SUPPORT CROSS PLATE LENGTH in C in UNIT WT D NET WT C DETAIL B DETAIL C ANTENNA PIPES "ASSEMBLY NO." PART NO. "A" PART DESCRIPTION "B" LENGTH "C" UNIT WT. "D" TOTAL WT. RMV P /8" O.D. SCH. 40 PIPE 63" , RMV P /8" O.D. SCH. 40 PIPE 72" , RMV P /8" O.D. SCH. 40 PIPE 84" , RMV P /8" O.D. SCH. 40 PIPE 96" , A REMOVED FLATWASHERS FROM ARM TO CLAMP RING CONNECTION 4516 CE 11/4/2011 RE DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS CPD BY DATE REVISION HISTORY TOLERANCE NOTES TOLERANCES ON DIMENSIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ARE: SAWED, SHEARED AND GAS CUT EDGES (± 0.030") DRILLED AND GAS CUT HOLES (± 0.030") - NO CONING OF HOLES LASER CUT EDGES AND HOLES (± 0.010") - NO CONING OF HOLES BENDS ARE ± 1/2 DEGREE ALL OTHER MACHINING (± 0.030") ALL OTHER ASSEMBLY (± 0.060") PROPRIETARY NOTE: THE DATA AND TECHNIQUES CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING ARE PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF VALMONT INDUSTRIES AND CONSIDERED A TRADE SECRET. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF VALMONT INDUSTRIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DESCRIPTION CPD NO. CLASS 4516 SUB MONOPOLE TRIPLE T-ARM FOR 12 ANTENNAS DRAWN BY CE DRAWING USAGE ENG. APPROVAL 4/15/2011 SEE "ASSEMBLY NO." CUSTOMER CHECED BY BMC 4/28/2011 PART NO. DWG. NO. valmont Engineering Support Team: RMV12-4XX Locations: New York, NY Atlanta, GA Los Angeles, CA Plymouth, IN Salem, OR Dallas, TX PAGE 1 OF 2
67 36" 44 3/4" (REF.) Y/2 Y/2 Y Y Y 150" L/2 L=ADJUSTABLE ADJUSTABLE A REMOVED FLATWASHERS FROM ARM TO CLAMP RING CONNECTION 4516 CE 11/4/2011 RE DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS CPD BY DATE REVISION HISTORY TOLERANCE NOTES TOLERANCES ON DIMENSIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ARE: SAWED, SHEARED AND GAS CUT EDGES (± 0.030") DRILLED AND GAS CUT HOLES (± 0.030") - NO CONING OF HOLES LASER CUT EDGES AND HOLES (± 0.010") - NO CONING OF HOLES BENDS ARE ± 1/2 DEGREE ALL OTHER MACHINING (± 0.030") ALL OTHER ASSEMBLY (± 0.060") PROPRIETARY NOTE: THE DATA AND TECHNIQUES CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING ARE PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF VALMONT INDUSTRIES AND CONSIDERED A TRADE SECRET. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF VALMONT INDUSTRIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DESCRIPTION CPD NO. CLASS 4516 SUB MONOPOLE TRIPLE T-ARM FOR 12 ANTENNAS DRAWN BY CE DRAWING USAGE ENG. APPROVAL 4/15/2011 SEE "ASSEMBLY NO." CUSTOMER CHECED BY BMC 4/28/2011 PART NO. DWG. NO. valmont Engineering Support Team: RMV12-4XX Locations: New York, NY Atlanta, GA Los Angeles, CA Plymouth, IN Salem, OR Dallas, TX PAGE 2 OF 2
68 ATTACHMENT C
69 HMB HMB Acoustics LLC 3 Cherry Tree Lane, Avon, Ct November 27, 2013 Harry M. Rocheville, EIT Civil Engineer Centek Engineering, Inc North Branford Road Branford, Ct Subject: Canaan Route 7 South - Noise Compliance Study Dear Mr. Rocheville: The noise levels for the A1, A2, V1 and V2 wall mounted HVAC units were calculated while they were running simultaneously. The combined noise level was then projected to each property line. The resultant noise level was compared to the State of Ct. Noise Regulation. The Regulation allows a noise level of 55 dba (daytime) and 45 dba (nighttime), when measured at a Residential Receptorʼs property line. I found that the four (4) units met the conditions for compliance as set forth in the Regulation at all property lines. Allan Smardin HMB Acoustics LLC
70 Tower Share Filing Noise Standards Compliance Review HMB HMB ACOUSTICS LLC PROJECT INFORMATION Centek Job #: Applicant: Applicant Site ID: Site Owner: Site Address: Subject Zoning District: Abutting Zoning District(s): AT&T Mobility CT Canaan - Route 7 South Verizon Wireless 188 Route 7, Falls Village, CT Residential Residential (All abutters) APPLICANT EQUIPMENT ID Noise Emitter Make/Model Prop. Line. Dist. (FT) North South East West A-1 Wall Mounted HVAC Marvair ASDCA A-2 Wall Mounted HVAC Marvair ASDCA EXISTING COLOCATORS: AT&T Metro PCS Other: Verizon Wireless Sprint T Mobile Other: Nextel None Other: EXISTING COLOCATOR EQUIPMENT OWNER Verizon Wireless ID Noise Emitter Make/Model Prop. Line. Dist. (FT) North South East West V-1 Wall Mounted HVAC Bard/W61A1-A05EPXXXJ V-2 Wall Mounted HVAC Bard/W61A1-A05EPXXXJ EXISTING COLOCATOR EQUIPMENT OWNER ID Noise Emitter Make/Model Prop. Line. Dist. (FT) North South East West 3 Cherry Tree Lane ~ Avon, CT ~ Phone ~
71 EXISTING COLOCATOR EQUIPMENT OWNER ID Noise Emitter Make/Model Prop. Line. Dist. (FT) North South East West EXISTING COLOCATOR EQUIPMENT OWNER ID Noise Emitter Make/Model Prop. Line. Dist. (FT) North South East West EXISTING COLOCATOR EQUIPMENT OWNER ID Noise Emitter Make/Model Prop. Line. Dist. (FT) North South East West CONCLUSION Daytime Regulation: 55 dba Nighttime Regulation: 45 dba Compliance: Yes No Compliance: BASIS OF FINDINGS: The Combined Noise Level From A1 and A2: North property line = 25 dba; South property line = 24 dba; East property line = 39 dba; West property line = 41 dba. The Combined Noise Level From V1 and V2: North property line = 26 dba; South property line = 23 dba; East property line = 39 dba; West property line = 41 dba. All 4 HVAC units running simultaneously will result in a 2 dba increase in all directions (N, S, E, W). The dba level in the North and South direction takes into account the effect from the acoustical shielding provided by the two equipment shelters. Yes No Prepared By: Alan Smardin, HMB ACOUSTICS LLC Date: 11/27/13 3 Cherry Tree Lane ~ Avon, CT ~ Phone ~
72 DWG. 1 OF ROUTE 7 SOUTH CANAAN, CT 06031
73 DWG. 2 OF ROUTE 7 SOUTH CANAAN, CT 06031
74 HMB HMB Acoustics LLC 3 CherryTree Lane, Avon, Ct Noise Evaluation Report AT&T Diesel Backup Power Generator 188 Route 7 South Canaan, Ct. April 5, 2014 Prepared For: Harry M. Rocheville, EIT Civil Engineer Centek Engineering, Inc North Branford Road Branford, Ct. Prepared By: Allan Smardin HMB Acoustics LLC 3 Cherry Tree Lane Avon, Ct.
75 - 1 - Introduction AT&T has proposed a diesel backup power generator to be located on a concrete pad at 188 Route 7 South, Canaan, Ct. The backup generator will run only when commercial power to the site is interrupted. It is important to note that the generator operates approximately minutes each week for testing. All testing is done during the daytime hours. Other than these testing periods, the generator runs only in times of emergency, when commercial power to the facility is interrupted. The purpose of this evaluation is to determine the anticipated noise level of the emergency backup generator. This report utilizes a dba scale. This scale is used because it closely approximates the response characteristic of the human ear to loudness, and is the scale most commonly used in the measurement of community noise. Noise Regulations The State of Ct. has enacted regulations which limit the amount of noise which may be transferred from one property to another. In pertinent part, the Regulations provide an exemption per Section 22a for noise emitted from the emergency generator.
76 - 2 - Noise Evaluation Results The noise levels listed below represent the calculated noise levels at each property line. These levels also take into account the effect of acoustical shielding, in the Northerly direction, provided by the proposed AT&T equipment shelter. Property Line dba Noise Level North 46 East 59 South 56 West 62
77 ATTACHMENT D
78 Tony Wells C Squared Systems 65 Dartmouth Drive Auburn, NH [email protected] C Squared Systems, LLC February 25, 2014 Connecticut Siting Council Subject: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ( AT&T ) 188 Route 7, Canaan, CT Dear Connecticut Siting Council: C Squared Systems has been retained by New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ( AT&T ) to investigate RF Power Density levels for the AT&T antenna arrays, to be installed on the existing monopole tower, located at 188 Route 7 in Canaan, CT. Calculations were done in accordance with FCC OET Bulletin 65. These worst-case calculations assume that all transmitters are simultaneously operating at full power and that there is 0 db of cable loss. The calculation point is 6 feet above ground level to model the RF power density at the head of a person standing at the base of the tower. Due to the directional nature of the proposed AT&T antennas, the majority of the RF power is focused out towards the horizon. As a result, there will be less RF power directed below the antennas relative to the horizon, and consequently lower power density levels around the base of the tower. Please refer to the Attachment for the vertical patterns of the proposed AT&T antennas. The calculated results below include a nominal 10 db off-beam pattern loss to account for the lower relative gain directly below the antennas. Location Ground Level Carrier Vertical Distance to Antenna (Ft.) Operating Frequency (MHz) Number of Trans. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) Per Transmitter (Watts) Power Density (mw/cm 2 ) Limit %MPE AT&T UMTS % AT&T UMTS % AT&T LTE % AT&T LTE % AT&T LTE % AT&T LTE Total 0.44% 3.39%
79 Summary: Under worst-case assumptions, RF Power Density levels for the proposed AT&T antenna arrays will not exceed 4.23% 1 of the FCC MPE limit for General Public/Uncontrolled Environments. Combined with the 2.33% of the FCC MPE limit produced by Verizon s existing installation, this gives a cumulative RF Power Density level of 6.56% of the FCC MPE limit for General Public/Uncontrolled Environments. Sincerely, Anthony Wells Managing Partner 1 The total %MPE is a summation of each unrounded contribution. Therefore, summing each rounded value may not reflect the total value listed in the table.
80 Attachment: AT&T s Antenna Data Sheets and Electrical Patterns 750 MHz Manufacturer: CCI Model #: HPA-65R-BUU-H8 Frequency Band: MHz Gain: 13.2 dbd Vertical Beamwidth: 10.1 Horizontal Beamwidth: 65 Polarization: Dual Pol ± 45 Size L x W x D: 92.4 x 14.8 x MHz Manufacturer: CCI Model #: HPA-65R-BUU-H8 Frequency Band: MHz Gain: 14.1 dbd Vertical Beamwidth: 8.4 Horizontal Beamwidth: 61 Polarization: Dual Pol ± 45 Size L x W x D: 92.4 x 14.8 x MHz Manufacturer: CCI Model #: HPA-65R-BUU-H8 Frequency Band: MHz Gain: 15.0 dbd Vertical Beamwidth: 5.6 Horizontal Beamwidth: 62 Polarization: Dual Pol ± 45 Size L x W x D: 92.4 x 14.8 x 7.4
81 2300 MHz Manufacturer: CCI Model #: HPA-65R-BUU-H8 Frequency Band: MHz Gain: 15.6 dbd Vertical Beamwidth: 4.5 Horizontal Beamwidth: 60 Polarization: Dual Pol ± 45 Size L x W x D: 92.4 x 14.8 x 7.4
82 ATTACHMENT E
83
FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples
FOUNDATION DESIGN Proportioning elements for: Transfer of seismic forces Strength and stiffness Shallow and deep foundations Elastic and plastic analysis Foundation Design 14-1 Load Path and Transfer to
LEGACY REPORT ER-5110. www.icc-es.org. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, 2003. Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code
LEGACY REPORT Reissued November 1, 2003 ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. www.icc-es.org Business/Regional Office # 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 # (562) 699-0543 Regional Office # 900
Chapter 3 - Structural Design
Chapter 3 - Structural Design 3.0 General 3.0.1 Design Overview Greenhouse buildings are a complete structure including the structural support and enclosure elements. The primary structural system includes:
Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars
Report on Wind Resistance of Signs supported by Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars Prepared for US Sign and Fabrication Corporation January, 2006 SUMMARY This study found the attachment of
System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor
Model 150 HELICAL ANCHOR System PN #MBHAT Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor System About Foundation Supportworks is a network of the most experienced and knowledgeable foundation repair
METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST
Compression Test, METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST Tension Test and Lateral Test According to the American Standards ASTM D1143 07, ASTM D3689 07, ASTM D3966 07 and Euro Codes EC7 Table of Contents
Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges
7.7 Truss bridges Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges Truss Girders, lattice girders or open web girders are efficient and economical structural systems, since the members experience
Stability. Security. Integrity.
Stability. Security. Integrity. PN #MBHPT Foundation Supportworks provides quality helical pile systems for both new construction and retrofit applications. 288 Helical Pile System About Foundation Supportworks
4B-2. 2. The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.
Shear Walls Buildings that use shear walls as the lateral force-resisting system can be designed to provide a safe, serviceable, and economical solution for wind and earthquake resistance. Shear walls
Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)
Cause: external force P Force vs. Stress Effect: internal stress f 05 Force vs. Stress Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-05 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Type of Force 1 Axial (tension /
TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION
TECHNICAL NOTE On Cold-Formed Steel Construction 1201 15th Street, NW, Suite 320 W ashington, DC 20005 (202) 785-2022 $5.00 Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006
Sports and High Mast Lighting Poles Phone: (866) 474-7200 Fax: (817) 924-7049
Sports and High Mast Lighting Poles 4 High Mast Lighting Poles General American LitePole offers a raising and lowering system that allows for ease of maintaining the lighting system at ground level. Ideal
APPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP 12-79 PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS
APPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP 12-79 PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS This appendix summarizes the criteria applied for the design of new hypothetical bridges considered in NCHRP 12-79 s Task 7 parametric
Specifications for Towers and Civil Works
Specifications for Towers and Civil Works Scope of work: The scope of works includes supply of Towers and miscellaneous items for the Expansion of GSM Rural B-Mobile project. 1 General 1) This Section
Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures
Chapter 8 Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures 8.1 Scope Provisions of Sec. 8.1 and 8.2 of Chapter 8 shall apply for detailing of reinforcement in reinforced concrete members, in general. For
Steel joists and joist girders are
THE STEEL CONFERENCE Hints on Using Joists Efficiently By Tim Holtermann, S.E., P.E.; Drew Potts, P.E.; Bob Sellers, P.E.; and Walt Worthley, P.E. Proper coordination between structural engineers and joist
[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]
[Helios Plaza] Houston, Texas Structural Option Adviser: Dr. Linda Hanagan [TECHNICAL REPORT I:] Structural Concepts & Existing Conditions Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Introduction... 3 Structural
POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)
POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns) Post and frame structures. The following requirements serve as minimum standards for post and frame structures within all of the following structural limitations:
Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers
Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers 3-1 Pre-Installation Establishes the minimum requirements for the siting, design, materials, access, and installation of manufactured dwellings, accessory
The Impact of Market Demands on Residential Post-Tensioned Foundation Design: An Ethical Dilemma
The Impact of Market Demands on Residential Post-Tensioned Foundation Design: An Ethical Dilemma Bart B. Barrett, B.S., P.E.1 Kerry S. Lee, M.B.A., P.E., M. ASCE2 Erik L. Nelson, Ph.D., P.E., M. ASCE3
Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.
MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E. Micropile Design and Construction Seminar Las Vegas, NV April 3-4, 2008 Outline When are micropiles subject to lateral load? How do we analyze
Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI 318-14
Draft Table of Contents Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI 318-14 BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ACI 318 14) Chapter 1 General 1.1 Scope of ACI 318
SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS
July 14, 2015 1.0 GENERAL BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS This work shall consist of furnishing all materials, equipment, labor, and incidentals necessary for conducting bi-directional
SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN
CHAPTER Structural Steel Design LRFD Method Third Edition SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Part II Structural
Telecommunication Poles
Telecommunication Poles Combining engineering expertise, high-quality manufacturing practices and an economical slip-joint design, Valmont s multisided monopole structures are available in heights up to
How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code
ABSTRACT How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code by Darin Willis, P.E. 1 Helical piles and anchors have been used in construction applications for more than 150 years. The
Joist. Reinforcement. Draft 12/7/02
Joist Reinforcement Draft 12/7/02 1 JOIST REINFORCING The purpose of this CSD Design Aid is to provide procedures and suggested details for the reinforcement of open web steel joists. There are three basic
TZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE
SECTION 2.2 PAGE 1 / 9 l DESCRIPTION UCAN TZ torque controlled mechanical expansion wedge anchors have a Category 1 classification. They are used to resist static, wind and seismic tension and shear loads
Index 20010 Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12)
Index 20010 Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12) Design Criteria AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th Edition; Structures Detailing Manual (SDM); Structures Design Guidelines (SDG)
REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:
HANDOUT REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition RETAINING WALLS Fifth Edition A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge
Journal of Civil Engineering (IEB), 34 (1) (26) 1-14 Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge Tanvir Manzur and Alamgir Habib Department of Civil Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering
Force measurement. Forces VECTORIAL ISSUES ACTION ET RÉACTION ISOSTATISM
Force measurement Forces VECTORIAL ISSUES In classical mechanics, a force is defined as "an action capable of modifying the quantity of movement of a material point". Therefore, a force has the attributes
SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE
SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: TREY HAMILTON, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design,
CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS - SEISMIC ISOLATION BEARINGS
CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS - SEISMIC ISOLATION BEARINGS 1.0 DESIGN 1.1 Scope of Work 1.1.1 This work shall consist of furnishing Isolation Bearings and installing Isolation Bearing Assemblies at the locations
PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE
FORM A PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE The following suggested specifications are written as a guide to assist the specifier in writing his own specifications. Specific circumstances
SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE
SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: TREY HAMILTON, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design,
Structural Integrity Analysis
Structural Integrity Analysis 1. STRESS CONCENTRATION Igor Kokcharov 1.1 STRESSES AND CONCENTRATORS 1.1.1 Stress An applied external force F causes inner forces in the carrying structure. Inner forces
DIVISION: 31 00 00 EARTHWORK SECTION: 31 63 00 BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: HUBBELL POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
0 ICC ES Report ICC ES (800) 4 6587 (56) 699 054 www.icc es.org 000 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 794 Reissued 05/05 This report is subject to renewal 05/06. DIVISION: 00 00 EARTHWORK SECTION: 6
6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES
Retrofitting Post & Pier Houses 71 6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES by James E. Russell, P.E. 72 Retrofitting Post & Pier Houses Retrofitting Post & Pier Houses 73 RETROFITTING POST AND PIER HOUSES This
Wisconsin Building Products Evaluation
Safety & Buildings Division 201 West Washington Avenue P.O. Box 2658 Madison, WI 53701-2658 Evaluation # 200813-O Wisconsin Building Products Evaluation Material Best Management Standards for Foundation
Transmission Foundations. helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures. www.hubbellpowersystems.com
Transmission Foundations helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures www.hubbellpowersystems.com Grid locked on your transmission job? Instant Foundation helical piles go places concrete
ICC-ES Evaluation Report
ICC-ES Evaluation Report ESR-2369 Reissued May 1, 2010 This report is subject to re-examination in one year. www.icc-es.org (800) 423-6587 (562) 699-0543 A Subsidiary of the International Code Council
Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair
Juneau Permit Center, 4 th Floor Marine View Center, (907)586-0770 This handout is designed to help you build your deck to comply with the 2006 International Residential Building code as modified by the
National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination
Structural Effective Beginning with the April 2011 The structural engineering exam is a breadth and exam examination offered in two components on successive days. The 8-hour Vertical Forces (Gravity/Other)
1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona
for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures SECTION 70 - GENERAL "APPENDIX CHAPTER 7 - EARTHEN MATERIAL STRUCTURES 70. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum standards of safety
Step 11 Static Load Testing
Step 11 Static Load Testing Test loading is the most definitive method of determining load capacity of a pile. Testing a pile to failure provides valuable information to the design engineer and is recommended
SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED
SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design, it is preferable to draw moment diagrams
ARCH 331 Structural Glossary S2014abn. Structural Glossary
Structural Glossary Allowable strength: Nominal strength divided by the safety factor. Allowable stress: Allowable strength divided by the appropriate section property, such as section modulus or cross
A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.
Design Step 4 Design Step 4.1 DECK SLAB DESIGN In addition to designing the deck for dead and live loads at the strength limit state, the AASHTO-LRFD specifications require checking the deck for vehicular
How To Model A Shallow Foundation
Finite Element Analysis of Elastic Settlement of Spreadfootings Founded in Soil Jae H. Chung, Ph.D. Bid Bridge Software Institute t University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Content 1. Background 2.
Bracing Webs in Trusses that have Dissimilar Configurations
Bracing Webs in Trusses that have Dissimilar Configurations Released April 25, 2006 Issue: Truss Design Drawings (TDD) that are prepared in accordance with ANSI/TPI 1, National Design Standard for Metal
Design Parameters for Steel Special Moment Frame Connections
SEAOC 2011 CONVENTION PROCEEDINGS Design Parameters for Steel Special Moment Frame Connections Scott M. Adan, Ph.D., S.E., SECB, Chair SEAONC Structural Steel Subcommittee Principal Adan Engineering Oakland,
ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA
ETABS Integrated Building Design Software Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA Version 8 January 2002 Copyright The computer program ETABS and all
Statics of Structural Supports
Statics of Structural Supports TYPES OF FORCES External Forces actions of other bodies on the structure under consideration. Internal Forces forces and couples exerted on a member or portion of the structure
Green Thread Product Data
Green Thread Product Data Applications Dilute Acids Caustics Produced Water Industrial Waste Hot Water Condensate Return Materials and Construction All pipe manufactured by filament winding process using
CE591 Fall 2013 Lecture 26: Moment Connections
CE591 Fall 2013 Lecture 26: Moment Connections Explain basic design procedure for moment (FR) connections Explain considerations for connections in momentresisting frames for seismic demands Describe problems
ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM
Ninth LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference (LACCEI 11), Engineering for a Smart Planet, Innovation, Information Technology and Computational Tools for Sustainable Development, August 3-, 11,
Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column
Design of reinforced concrete columns Type of columns Failure of reinforced concrete columns Short column Column fails in concrete crushed and bursting. Outward pressure break horizontal ties and bend
EZ-48-3AB-125-35 Weather Station Mounting Tripod and Mast
EZ-48-3AB-125-35 Weather Station Mounting Tripod and Mast EZ-125-35M 35 Mast Extension (Optional) EZ-125-SK Stake Kit (Optional) EZ-46-3 Tar Pad Kit (Optional) EZ-GWA Guy Wire Kit (Optional) Ambient Weather
International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL
PROJECT International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL EXP. 11/30/2014 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS July 24, 2014 BOWMAN, BARRETT & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 312.228.0100
FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE
County: Any Design: BRG Date: 10/007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 10/007 FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE Design: Based on AASHTO LRFD 007 Specifications, TxDOT LRFD Bridge Design Manual, and TxDOT Project 0-4371
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PART 8000 - PRECAST CONCRETE TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Number Page 8100 PRECAST CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION - GENERAL 8-3 8101 General
DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,
DESIGN OF SLABS Dr. G. P. Chandradhara Professor of Civil Engineering S. J. College of Engineering Mysore 1. GENERAL A slab is a flat two dimensional planar structural element having thickness small compared
PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES
J-1 Section 09110 Long Form Specification INTERIOR METAL STUD FRAMING This section includes lightweight, usually 0.036 inch (0.9 mm) thick or lighter, non-axial load bearing metal stud framing including
New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design
New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design Part 1: 3D model based analysis using general beam-column FEM Ferenc Papp* and József Szalai ** * Associate Professor, Department of Structural
Tower Cross Arm Numerical Analysis
Chapter 7 Tower Cross Arm Numerical Analysis In this section the structural analysis of the test tower cross arm is done in Prokon and compared to a full finite element analysis using Ansys. This is done
Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility
Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility Problem The project consists of building several dry product storage silos near an existing rail siding in an open field presently
DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED BARRIER CABLE SYSTEMS
8601 North Black Canyon Highway Suite 103 Phoenix, AZ 8501 For Professionals Engaged in Post-Tensioning Design Issue 14 December 004 DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED BARRIER CABLE SYSTEMS by James D. Rogers 1 1.0
SECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN
SECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN 5.01 GENERAL Sanitary sewer improvements shall be designed to serve the ultimate level of City development as defined in the General Plan and the Wastewater Facilities
CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF BUILDING AND SAFETY COMMISSIONERS VAN AMBATIELOS PRESIDENT E. FELICIA BRANNON VICE PRESIDENT JOSELYN GEAGA-ROSENTHAL GEORGE HOVAGUIMIAN JAVIER NUNEZ CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI
MEZZANINE SPECIFICATIONS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE 1.2 APPROVED MANUFACTURER 1.3 REGULATORY ORGANIZATIONS AND GROUPS 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE
MEZZANINE SPECIFICATIONS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE This specification is intended to describe the general requirements applicable to a proper structural mezzanine design. In addition, it is to serve as
Design of Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls
DESIGN GUIDE 2 Design of Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls March 1998 The following publication was developed by R.L. Brockenbrough & Associates for the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), In the production
bi directional loading). Prototype ten story
NEESR SG: Behavior, Analysis and Design of Complex Wall Systems The laboratory testing presented here was conducted as part of a larger effort that employed laboratory testing and numerical simulation
PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: FORMTECH ENTERPRISES, INC. SERIES/MODEL: Truline PRODUCT TYPE: PVC Seawall
PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT Rendered to: FORMTECH ENTERPRISES, INC. SERIES/MODEL: Truline PRODUCT TYPE: PVC Seawall Report No.: Test Dates: 04/17/12 Through: 04/18/12 Report Date: 06/13/12 130 Derry Court
SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS
Page 1 of 9 SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Description of Work: This work consists of furnishing all materials, equipment and
2. Division 05 Structural Steel Framing for steel framework requirements
SECTION 131200 - CLIMBING WALLS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. This section includes the following: 1. GFRC Rock Realistic Climbing Wall System B. Related Sections 1. Division 04 Unit Masonry 2. Division
SERIES NG 1800 STRUCTURAL STEELWORK
MANUAL OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR HIGHWAY WORKS VOLUME 2 NOTES FOR GUIDANCE ON THE SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY WORKS SERIES NG 1800 STRUCTURAL STEELWORK Contents Clause Title Page NG 1800 (08/14) General
2.4M SERIES 1241 ANTENNA
4096-859 Revision A August 7, 2012 2.4M SERIES 1241 ANTENNA GENERAL DYNAMICS SATCOM Technologies 1500 Prodelin Drive Newton NC 28658USA Phone 828-464-4141 www.gdsatcom.com Prodelin Corporation Page 1 8/17/2012
Structural Bolting. Notice the Grade 5 has a much smaller head configuration and a shorter shank then the A325 structural bolt. Rev.
Structural Bolting ASTM A325 and ASTM A490 are the two U.S. standard structural bolts. When looking at the mechanical requirements of bolts it appears that an ASTM A325 and SAE J429 Grade 5 are identical
vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net since 1997, your source for engineering information for the deep foundation and marine construction industries, and the historical site for Vulcan Iron Works
CT-02 CABLE TRAY SYSTEMS
CT-02 CABLE TRAY SYSTEMS SYSTEMS THAT MAKE SENSE Introduction B-Line Systems was formed in 96 and has over 30 years experience manufacturing cable tray systems in which it has grown to become the industry
SECTION 11014 WINDOW WASHING SYSTEMS
SECTION 11014 WINDOW WASHING SYSTEMS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section includes, but is not limited to, design and furnishing portable davits, davit sleeves, dvit bases, four (4) removable outriggers,
Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design
Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design Presented by: Ronald Thornton, P.E. Define several terms related to reinforced concrete design Learn the basic theory behind structural analysis and reinforced concrete
SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:
SEISMIC DESIGN Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading: 1. Seismic Performance Category (SPC), varies from A to E, depending on how the
Requirements for the Attachment of Communication Cable Facilities on PPL Poles
Page 99 of 137 Requirements for the Attachment of Communication Cable Facilities on Replaces: URS-3002 URS-3004 URS-101C-304 A-157649 Page 100 of 137 Reference Notes for Drawings: General 1. The term communication
STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Single-Storey Steel Buildings Part 5: Detailed Design of Trusses
STEEL BUILDIGS I EUROPE Single-Storey Steel Buildings Part 5: Detailed Design of Trusses Single-Storey Steel Buildings Part 5: Detailed Design of Trusses 5 - ii Part 5: Detailed Design of Trusses FOREWORD
EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL
EXAMPLE DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL A sheet pile wall is required to support a 2 excavation. The soil is uniform as shown in the figure. To take into account the friction between the wall
New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations
from New construction foundations don t have to be a headache. The CHANCE Helical Pier Foundation System gives you the performance of concrete without the drawbacks and liabilities of driven piles and
COLORADO MODEL. 35 x 65 SPECIFICATIONS
COLORADO MODEL 35 x 65 SPECIFICATIONS Dimensions: Roof Dimensions 35-0 x 65-0 Column Dimensions (center to center) 31-0 x 30-6 Minimum Clearance 14-0 Roof Height @ Peak ±18-8 Curved Roof ±42-6 radius Square
STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. Gary S. Berman, PE GREYHAWK North America, LLC. GREYHAWK North America, LLC
STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION by Gary S. Berman, PE GREYHAWK North America, LLC Table of Contents GLOSSARY 3 I. INTRODUCTION TO STEEL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 8 II. THE STEEL PROCESS FROM DESIGN
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POLES The Solid Alternative to Wood
Prestressed Concrete Utility Poles U-1 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE S The Solid Alternative to Wood Lonestar Prestress concrete poles were developed to meet the expanding need of a supporting structure for; street,
Reinforced Concrete Design
FALL 2013 C C Reinforced Concrete Design CIVL 4135 ii 1 Chapter 1. Introduction 1.1. Reading Assignment Chapter 1 Sections 1.1 through 1.8 of text. 1.2. Introduction In the design and analysis of reinforced
High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts
Supplemental Technical Specification for High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts SCDOT Designation: SC-M-712 (9/15) September 3, 2015 1.0 GENERAL This work shall consist of performing high-strain
Hunter College school of Social Work Thesis Proposal
Fall 2009 Hunter College school of Social Work Thesis Proposal To analyze how energy efficiency can be implemented using facade and green roof redesign. It ties structural engineering concepts with existing
