EN 1991-1-4:2005. Wind actions



Similar documents
Guide to the use of EN Wind Actions

EUROCODE 1 Actions on Building Structures

CHAPTER 6 WIND LOADS

English version Version Française Deutsche Fassung. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions

Prof. Dr. Zahid A. Siddiqi, UET, Lahore WIND LOAD

Eurocodes Background and Applications

Structural fire design Eurocode Timber structures

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF WIND ON BUILDING STRUCTURES

Structural Analysis. EUROCODE 2 Background and Applications

M. Belloli, A. Collina, F. Resta Politecnico di Milano O.I.T.A.F. SEMINAR. Grenoble 27 April 2006

Vibration mitigation for metro line on soft clay

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

The information in this report is provided in good faith and is believed to be correct, but the Met. Office can accept no responsibility for any

CHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS FOR A 50 YEARS OLD CONCRETE BRIDGE

First 14-storey wood building in the world at Bergen in Norway Premier bâtiment en bois à 14 niveaux au monde à Bergen en Norvège


EN DK NA:2007

MacroFlo Opening Types User Guide <Virtual Environment> 6.0

NATIONAL ANNEX TO STANDARD SFS-EN 1990 EUROCODE BASIS OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN

SIGN STRUCTURES GUIDE SUPPORT DESIGN FOR UK TRAFFIC SIGNS

As a minimum, the report must include the following sections in the given sequence:

WIND SHEAR, ROUGHNESS CLASSES AND TURBINE ENERGY PRODUCTION

INFLUENCES OF VERTICAL WIND PROFILES ON POWER PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS

Mobile Phones: Jargon Explained

Brandangersundet Bridge A slender and light network arch

Florida Building Code 2004 SECTION 1009 STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS

Fire safety in timber buildings

WIND TUNNEL TESTING: A GENERAL OUTLINE

Conceptual design and design examples for multi-storey buildings

Structural concepts for minimum facility platforms for Marginal field development in western offshore, India

Timber Frame Construction

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Óbuda University Power System Department. The wind. Dr. Péter Kádár Óbuda University, Power System Department, Hungary

Study on Drag Coefficient for the Flow Past a Cylinder

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

Advanced FBC: Changes to the Wind Load Provisions of the 2010 Florida Building Code and ASCE 7-10

ENERGY YIELD ASSESSMENT

Eksplosjonsrisiko, værbeskyttelse og optimalisering av design

OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY

Ministry of the Environment Decree on applying Eurocode standards in building construction

DS/EN 1990 DK NA:2013

Session 21 Max Sheppard. Improved Complex Pier Scour Prediction Procedure

Virtual Met Mast verification report:

EN Eurocode 1 Accidental Actions. Ton Vrouwenvelder TNO Bouw / TU Delft. EUROCODES Background and Applications

Traffic Management Systems with Air Quality Monitoring Feedback. Phil Govier City & County of Swansea

Sweden s leading manufacturer of small-scale wind power stations!

Analysis of the Response Under Live Loads of Two New Cable Stayed Bridges Built in Mexico

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

FLow pattern around cable and its aerodynamic characteristics in critical Reynolds number range

Analysis of the Interstate 10 Twin Bridge s Collapse During Hurricane Katrina

Computer Program for the Analysis of Loads On Buildings. Using the ASCE 7-93 Standard. Stephen E. Browning. Master of Engineering.

DS/EN DK NA:2014

Chapter 9. Steady Flow in Open channels

Damage Potential of Tropical Cyclone

Installation manual Pitched Roof Clamp System

Managing The Integrity Threat Of Subsea Pipework Fatigue Failure. John Hill Senior Consultant Xodus Group

Scope of EN Clarification Document

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC October 27, 2015 Session 26

REHABILITATION OF THE FIGUEIRA DA FOZ BRIDGE

BAFFLES AS A MEANS OF STATION PROTECTION FROM HIGH AIR VELOCITIES - COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL AND FIELD MEASUREMENTS RESULTS

Wind and Tall Buildings Negatives and Positives

Scour and Scour Protection

Installation manual ValkPitched - Insert

Along-wind self-excited forces of two-dimensional cables under extreme wind speeds

Managing Extreme Weather at Transport for London. ARCC Assembly - 12 June 2014 Helen Woolston, Transport for London Sustainability Coordinator

RenaissanceRe Wall of Wind Research -- Moving Innovations from Theory to Applications

QUICK GUIDE - WASP-CFD IN WINDPRO. Draft 1 edition: Purpose: EMD International A/S, Aalborg February 1 st, 2013

Loads and Seismic Design National Building Code Wind and Snow Importance Factors

HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT IN FIN AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER - A REVIEW

Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures

South African wind loading specifications: The Euro way?

Head Loss in Pipe Flow ME 123: Mechanical Engineering Laboratory II: Fluids

Difference in levels of groundborne noise and vibrations between the T-1300 and MX-3000 metro trains in Oslo

Gas Meter Clearances and Service Installation Requirements

Explanatory Materials to the Code of Practice on Wind Effects in Hong Kong 2004

Including thermal effects in CFD simulations

EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES

Pedestrian Loads and Dynamic Performances of Lively Footbridges: an Overview

Wind influence on container handling, equipment and stacking

Complex terrain wind resource estimation with the wind-atlas method: Prediction errors using linearized and nonlinear CFD micro-scale models

Conservatory Roof Structural Information Guide

Design rules for bridges in Eurocode 3

Validation n 2 of the Wind Data Generator (WDG) software performance. Comparison with measured mast data - Flat site in Northern France

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

Installation manual ValkPitched - Clamp

Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Part 1-1: General actions - Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings

LOAD TESTING OF SOME NEW BRIDGES IN LATVIA

Dimensional Analysis

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

Wind Resource Assessment for BETHEL, ALASKA Date last modified: 2/21/2006 Compiled by: Mia Devine

Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures

Vibrations of a Free-Free Beam

EFFECTS OF COMPLEX WIND REGIMES ON TURBINE PERFORMANCE

Comparison of Resource and Energy Yield Assessment Procedures

PENNDOT 3D MODELING FOR STRUCTURES WORKSHOP. Presented by: Steven Pletcher and Chris Daniels, P.E. October 21, 2014

Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam

Transcription:

EN 1991 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Your logo Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EN 1991-1-4:2005 Wind actions

EN 1991-1-4:2005 Contents Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 2 1. General 2. Design situations 3. Modelling of wind actions 4. Wind velocity and velocity pressure 5. Wind actions 6. Structural factor 7. Pressure and force coefficients 8. Wind actions on bridges

EN 1991-1-4:2005 Contents Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 3 Annex A. Terrain effects B. Procedure 1 for determining the structural factor C. Procedure 2 for determining the structural factor D. Structural factors for different types of structures E. Vortex shedding and aeroelastic instabilities F. Dynamic characteristics of structures

Section 1 General 1.1 Scope Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 4 (2) This Part is applicable to: - Buildings and civil engineering works with heights up to 200 m - Bridges having no span greater than 200 m, provided that they satisfy the criteria for dynamic response (3) This part is intended to predict characteristic wind actions on land-based structures, their components and appendages

Section 1 General 1.1 Scope Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 5 Draft corrigendum to EN 1991-1-4:2005 22 January 2008 (11) Guyed masts and lattice towers are treated in EN 1993-3-1 and lighting columns in EN 40 (12) This part does not give guidance on the following aspects: - torsional vibrations, e.g. tall buildings with a central core - bridge deck vibrations from transverse wind turbulence - wind actions on cable supported bridges - vibrations where more than the fundamental mode needs to be considered

Section 2 Design situations Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 6 (1)P The relevant wind actions shall be determined for each design situation identified in accordance with EN 1990, 3.2. (2) Traffic, snow and ice (3) Execution (4) Where in design windows and doors are assumed to be shut under storm conditions, the effect of these being open should be treated as an accidental design situation

Section 3 Modelling of wind actions Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 7 3.1 Nature 3.2 Representations of wind actions 3.3 Classification of wind actions (1) Unless otherwise specified, wind actions should be classified as variable fixed actions 3.4 Characteristic values (1) Note: All coefficients or models, to derive wind actions from basic values, are chosen so that the probability of the calculated wind actions does not exceed the probability of these basic values 3.5 Models

Section 4 Wind vel. and vel. pres. - 4.2 Basic values Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 8 v b = c dir c season v b,0

Section 4 Wind vel. and vel. pres. - 4.2 Basic values Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 9 ENV 1991-2-4:1995

Norway: Basic wind velocity. NS 3491-4:2002 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 10

UK: Basic wind velocity. BS 6399-2:1997 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 11

EUROCODES Faroe Islands extreme winds Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 12

Faroe Islands extreme winds Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 13 Vindklima i Danmark og i udlandet 29

Faroe Islands measuring stations Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 14

Faroe Islands - Glyvursnes Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 15 Vindklima i Danmark og i udlandet 37

Faroe Islands basic wind velocities Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 16

Italy - Messina Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 17

Southerly winds at Messina bridge deck height Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 18

Basis for updated European wind map? Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 19 ENV 1991-2-4:1995

Climatological changes? Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 20

Influence of terrain - measured wind velocities Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 21

Section 4.3 Mean wind Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 22 v m ( z) = c ( z) c ( z) r o v b

Section 4.3.2 Terrain roughness Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 23 c r ( z) = k r ln( z / z 0 ) k r = 0,19 z z 0 0, II 0,07 z 0, II = 0,05m

Terrain categories and terrain parameters Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 24

Annex A: Terrain category I and II Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 25

EUROCODES Annex A: Terrain category III and IV Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 26

Annex A: Terrain category 0 coastal area Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 27

Coastal area exposed to the open sea Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 28

Figure 4.1 - Assessment of terrain roughness Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 29

A.2 Transition between roughness categories Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 30

A.2 Transition between roughness categories Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 31 Procedure 1 If the structure is situated near a change of terrain roughness at a distance: - less than 2 km from the smoother category 0 - less than 1 km from the smoother categories I to III the smoother terrain category in the upwind direction should be used. Small areas (less than 10% of the area under consideration) with deviating roughness may be ignored.

A.3 Terrain orography. Figure A.1 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 32

Section 4.4 Wind turbulence. Turbulence intensity Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 33 I ( z) v = 1 c o k I ln( z / z 0 )

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 34 EUROCODES Section 4.5 Peak velocity pressure, peak velocity ) ( ) ( 7 1 ) ( ) ( 2 1 )) ( 7 (1 ) ( 2 z v z I z v z v z I z q m v p m v p + = + = ρ

Measured wind velocities Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 35

Section 5 Wind actions 5.1 General Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 36

Section 5.2 Wind pressure on surfaces Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 37 w e = q ( z ) p e c pe w i = q ( z ) p i c pi

Figure 5.1 Pressure on surfaces Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 38

Section 7.2 Pressure coeff. for buildings. Figure 7.2 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 39

Section 7.2.2 Vertical walls. Figure 7.5 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 40

Section 7.2.2 Vertical walls. Table 7.1 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 41

Section 7.2.5 Duopitch roofs. Figure 7.8 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 42

Section 7.2.5 Duopitch roofs. Table 7.4a Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 43

Section 5.3 Wind forces Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 44 F w = c c c q ( z ) s d f p e A ref

Section 6 Structural factor Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 45 6.2 Determination of structural factor The structural factor may be taken as 1 for a) buildings with a height less than 15 m b) facade and roof elements having a natural frequency greater than 5 Hz c) framed buildings which have structural walls and which are less than 100 m high and whose height is less than 4 times the in-wind depth d) chimneys with circular cross-sections whose height is less than 60 m and 6,5 times the diameter

Annex D Structural factor Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 46

Annex D Structural factor Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 47

Annex D Structural factor Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 48

Annex D Structural factor Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 49

Annex D Structural factor Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 50

Section 6 Structural factor. Figure 6.1 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 51

Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 52 EUROCODES Section 6.3 Detailed procedure 2 2 2 2 2 2 ) ( 7 1 ) ( 2 1 ) ( 7 1 ) ( 7 1 ) ( 7 1 ) ( 2 1 B z I R B z I k c z I B z I c z I R B z I k c c s v s v p d s v s v s s v s v p d s + + + = + + = + + + =

Backgrund turbulence and resonance turbulence Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 53

Wind vortices versus structural size Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 54

Procedure 1 (dotted line) versus theory (solid line) Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 55

Procedure 2 (dotted line) versus theory (solid line) Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 56

Structural factor. Procedure 1 or 2? Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 57 Procedure 2 has a more accurate representation of the theoretical background compared to procedure 1

Annex E Vortex shedding Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 58 Chimneys Bridges

Annex E Vortex shedding. Bending vibrations Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 59

Annex E Vortex sheding. Ovalling vibrations Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 60

Annex E Vortex shedding. Critical wind velocity Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 61 v crit, i = b n St i, y v crit, i = b n i, o 2 St

EUROCODES Vortex shedding. Chimneys Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 62

EUROCODES Vortex shdding. Chimneys Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 63

Approach 1 versus approach 2 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 64 Approach 1: Vortex-resonance model Approach 2: Spectral model Turbulence is an active parameter only in approach 2 E1.5.1 General (3) Approach 2 allows for the consideration of different turbulence intensities, which may differ due to meteorological conditions. For regions where it is likely that it may become very cold and stratified flow condition may occur (e.g. in coastal areas in Northern Europe), approach 2 may be used.

Vortex shedding. Bridge cross section Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 65

Vortex shedding. Bridge cross section. Approach 1 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 66

Vortex shedding. Bridge cross section. Approach 2 Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 67

Vortex shedding. Approach 1 or 2? Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 68 Approach 2 has a more accurate representation of the physical phenomenon compared to approach 1