Deterministic Finite Automata



Similar documents
Regular Languages and Finite State Machines

Reading 13 : Finite State Automata and Regular Expressions

6.045: Automata, Computability, and Complexity Or, Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring, Class 4 Nancy Lynch

CS5236 Advanced Automata Theory

CS154. Turing Machines. Turing Machine. Turing Machines versus DFAs FINITE STATE CONTROL AI N P U T INFINITE TAPE. read write move.

Automata and Formal Languages

Turing Machines: An Introduction

Formal Languages and Automata Theory - Regular Expressions and Finite Automata -

CS 3719 (Theory of Computation and Algorithms) Lecture 4

Computability Theory

Automata and Computability. Solutions to Exercises

Lecture I FINITE AUTOMATA

Automata on Infinite Words and Trees

Notes on Complexity Theory Last updated: August, Lecture 1

I. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

Finite Automata. Reading: Chapter 2

C H A P T E R Regular Expressions regular expression

3515ICT Theory of Computation Turing Machines

Introduction to Automata Theory. Reading: Chapter 1

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao, David Tse Note 2

1 Definition of a Turing machine

How To Compare A Markov Algorithm To A Turing Machine

INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY

Finite Automata. Reading: Chapter 2

Theory of Computation Chapter 2: Turing Machines

(IALC, Chapters 8 and 9) Introduction to Turing s life, Turing machines, universal machines, unsolvable problems.

Introduction to Turing Machines

Pushdown automata. Informatics 2A: Lecture 9. Alex Simpson. 3 October, School of Informatics University of Edinburgh als@inf.ed.ac.

THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE. Contents

Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning

Fundamentele Informatica II

8 Divisibility and prime numbers

THE TURING DEGREES AND THEIR LACK OF LINEAR ORDER

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Informatique Fondamentale IMA S8

Regular Languages and Finite Automata

Regular Expressions and Automata using Haskell

On Winning Conditions of High Borel Complexity in Pushdown Games

Cardinality. The set of all finite strings over the alphabet of lowercase letters is countable. The set of real numbers R is an uncountable set.

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson

CHAPTER 7 GENERAL PROOF SYSTEMS

ω-automata Automata that accept (or reject) words of infinite length. Languages of infinite words appear:

3. Mathematical Induction

Lecture 2: Universality

The Ergodic Theorem and randomness

MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION. Mathematical Induction. This is a powerful method to prove properties of positive integers.

INCIDENCE-BETWEENNESS GEOMETRY

Cartesian Products and Relations

Math 55: Discrete Mathematics

1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.

CSE 135: Introduction to Theory of Computation Decidability and Recognizability

Degrees that are not degrees of categoricity

it is easy to see that α = a

Computational Models Lecture 8, Spring 2009

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm

88 CHAPTER 2. VECTOR FUNCTIONS. . First, we need to compute T (s). a By definition, r (s) T (s) = 1 a sin s a. sin s a, cos s a

Finite dimensional C -algebras

Lecture 1: Course overview, circuits, and formulas

Metric Spaces. Chapter 1

Introduction to Finite Automata

T Reactive Systems: Introduction and Finite State Automata

Techniques algébriques en calcul quantique

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

6.2 Permutations continued

MATH 4330/5330, Fourier Analysis Section 11, The Discrete Fourier Transform

Factorization in Polynomial Rings

Examination paper for MA0301 Elementær diskret matematikk

The Halting Problem is Undecidable

Mathematical Induction. Lecture 10-11

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include

CHAPTER 5. Number Theory. 1. Integers and Division. Discussion

Winter Camp 2011 Polynomials Alexander Remorov. Polynomials. Alexander Remorov

6.080/6.089 GITCS Feb 12, Lecture 3

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.

ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS

CS 103X: Discrete Structures Homework Assignment 3 Solutions

24 Uses of Turing Machines

1 = (a 0 + b 0 α) (a m 1 + b m 1 α) 2. for certain elements a 0,..., a m 1, b 0,..., b m 1 of F. Multiplying out, we obtain

Kevin James. MTHSC 412 Section 2.4 Prime Factors and Greatest Comm

This asserts two sets are equal iff they have the same elements, that is, a set is determined by its elements.

Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2012

Follow links for Class Use and other Permissions. For more information send to:

Today s Agenda. Automata and Logic. Quiz 4 Temporal Logic. Introduction Buchi Automata Linear Time Logic Summary

The Classes P and NP

6 Commutators and the derived series. [x,y] = xyx 1 y 1.

1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1

Compiler Construction

Automata Theory. Şubat 2006 Tuğrul Yılmaz Ankara Üniversitesi

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

Omega Automata: Minimization and Learning 1

Real Roots of Univariate Polynomials with Real Coefficients

MATH10040 Chapter 2: Prime and relatively prime numbers

2.1 Complexity Classes

Lecture Notes on Discrete Mathematics

Quotient Rings and Field Extensions

FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z

arxiv:math/ v3 [math.gn] 31 Oct 2010

Learning Analysis by Reduction from Positive Data

k, then n = p2α 1 1 pα k

CONTINUED FRACTIONS AND PELL S EQUATION. Contents 1. Continued Fractions 1 2. Solution to Pell s Equation 9 References 12

Transcription:

1 Deterministic Finite Automata Definition: A deterministic finite automaton (DFA) consists of 1. a finite set of states (often denoted Q) 2. a finite set Σ of symbols (alphabet) 3. a transition function that takes as argument a state and a symbol and returns a state (often denoted δ) 4. a start state often denoted q 0 5. a set of final or accepting states (often denoted F) We have q 0 Q and F Q

2 Deterministic Finite Automata So a DFA is mathematically represented as a 5-uple (Q, Σ, δ, q 0, F) The transition function δ is a function in Q Σ Q Q Σ is the set of 2-tuples (q, a) with q Q and a Σ

3 Deterministic Finite Automata How to present a DFA? With a transition table 0 1 q 0 q 2 q 0 q 1 q 1 q 1 q 2 q 2 q 1 The indicates the start state: here q 0 The indicates the final state(s) (here only one final state q 1 ) This defines the following transition diagram 1 0 q 0 0 q 2 1 q 1 0,1

4 Deterministic Finite Automata For this example Q = {q 0, q 1, q 2 } start state q 0 F = {q 1 } Σ = {0, 1} δ is a function from Q Σ to Q δ : Q Σ Q δ(q 0, 1) = q 0 δ(q 0, 0) = q 2

5 Example: password When does the automaton accepts a word?? It reads the word and accepts it if it stops in an accepting state q 0 t q 1 h q 2 e q 3 n q 4 t h e q 5 n Only the word then is accepted Here Q = {q 0, q 1, q 2, q 3, q 4 } Σ is the set of all characters F = {q 4 } We have a stop or dead state q 5, not accepting

6 How a DFA Processes Strings Let us build an automaton that accepts the words that contain 01 as a subword Σ = {0, 1} L = {x01y x, y Σ } We use the following states A: start B: the most recent input was 1 (but not 01 yet) C: the most recent input was 0 (so if we get a 1 next we should go to the accepting state D) D: we have encountered 01 (accepting state)

7 We get the following automaton 1 A 1 B 0 0 C 1 D 0,1 0 Transition table 0 1 A C B B C B C C D D D D Q = {A,B,C,D}, Σ = {0,1}, start state A, final state(s) {D}

8 Extending the Transition Function to Strings In the previous example, what happens if we get 011? 100? 10101? We define ˆδ(q, x) by induction ˆδ : Q Σ Q BASIS ˆδ(q, ɛ) = q for x = 0 INDUCTION suppose x = ay (y is a string, a is a symbol) ˆδ(q, ay) = ˆδ(δ(q, a), y) Notice that if x = a we have ˆδ(q, a) = δ(q, a) since a = aɛ and ˆδ(δ(q, a), ɛ) = δ(q, a)

9 Extending the Transition Function to Strings ˆδ : Q Σ Q We write q.x instead of ˆδ(q, x) We can now define mathematically the language accepted by a given automaton Q, Σ, δ, q 0, F L = {x Σ q 0.x F } On the previous example 100 is not accepted and 10101 is accepted

10 Minimalisation The same language may be represented by different DFA 1 A 1 B 0 0 C 1 D 0,1 0 and 1 A 0 0 B 1 C 0,1

11 Minimalisation Later in the course we shall show that there is only one machine with the minimum number of states (up to renaming of states) Furthermore, there is a (clever) algorithm which can find this minimal automaton given an automaton for a language

12 Example M n the cyclic automaton with n states on Σ = {1} such that L(M n ) = {1 l n divides l}

13 Functional representation: Version 1 Q = A B C and E = 0 1 and W = [E] One function next : Q E Q next (A, 1) = A, next (A, 0) = B next (B, 1) = C, next (B, 0) = B next (C, b) = C One function run : Q W Q run (q, b : x) = run (next (q, b), x), run (q, []) = q accept x = f inal (run (A, x)) where final A = final B = False, final C = True

14 Functional representation: Version 2 E = 0 1, W = [E] Three functions F A, F B, F C : W Bool F A (1 : x) = F A x, F A (0 : x) = F B x, F A [] = False F B (1 : x) = F C x, F B (0 : x) = F B x, F B [] = False F C (1 : x) = F C x, F C (0 : x) = F C x, F C [] = True We have a mutual recursive definition of 3 functions

15 Functional representation: Version 3 data Q = A B C data E = O I next :: Q -> E -> Q next A I = A next A O = B next B I = C next B O = B next C _ = C run :: Q -> [E] -> Q run q (b:x) = run (next q b) x run q [] = q

16 Functional representation: Version 3 accept :: [E] -> Bool accept x = final (run A x) final :: Q -> Bool final A = False final B = False final C = True

17 Functional representation: Version 4 We have Q -> E -> Q ~ Q x E -> Q ~ E -> (Q -> Q)

18 Functional representation: Version 4 data Q = A B C data E = O I next :: E -> Q -> Q next I A = A next O A = B next I B = C next O B = B next _ C = C run :: Q -> [E] -> Q run q (b:x) = run (next b q) x run q [] = q

19 Functional representation: Version 4 -- run q [b1,...,bn] is -- next bn (next b(n-1) (... (next b1 q)...)) -- run = foldl next

20 A proof by induction A very important result, quite intuitive, is the following. Theorem: for any state q and any word x and y we have q.(xy) = (q.x).y Proof by induction on x. We prove that: for all q we have q.(xy) = (q.x).y (notice that y is fixed) Basis: x = ɛ then q.(xy) = q.y = (q.x).y Induction step: we have x = az and we assume q.(zy) = (q.z).y for all q

21 The other definition of ˆδ Recall that a(b(cd)) = ((ab)c)d; we have two descriptions of words We define ˆδ (q, ɛ) = q and ˆδ (q, xa) = δ(ˆδ (q, x), a) Theorem: We have q.x = ˆδ(q, x) = ˆδ (q, x) for all x

22 Indeed we have proved q.ɛ = q and q.(xy) = (q.x).y The other definition of ˆδ As a special case we have q.(xa) = (q.x).a This means that we have two functions f(x) = q.x and g(x) = ˆδ (q, x) which satisfy f(ɛ) = g(ɛ) = q and f(xa) = f(x).a g(xa) = g(x).a Hence f(x) = g(x) for all x that is q.x = ˆδ (q, x)

23 Automatic Theorem Proving f(0) = h(0) = 0, g(0) = 1 f(n + 1) = g(n), g(n + 1) = f(n), h(n + 1) = 1 h(n) We have f(n) = h(n) We can prove this automatically using DFA

24 Automatic Theorem Proving We have 8 states: Q = {0, 1} {0, 1} {0, 1} We have only one action Σ = {1} and δ((a, b, c), s) = (b, a, 1 c) The initial state is (0, 1, 0) = (f(0), g(0), h(0)) Then we have (0, 1, 0).1 n = (f(n), g(n), h(n)) We check that all accessible states satisfy a = c (that is, the property a = c is an invariant for each transition of the automata)

25 A more complex example Automatic Theorem Proving f(0) = 0 f(1) = 1 f(n+2) = f(n)+f(n+1) f(n)f(n+1) f(2) = 1 f(3) = 0 f(4) = 1 f(5) = 1... Show that f(n + 3) = f(n) by using Q = {0, 1} {0, 1} {0, 1} and the transition function (a, b, c) (b, c, b + c bc) with the initial state (0, 1, 1)

26 Product of automata How do we represent interaction between machines? This is via the product operation There are different kind of products We may then have combinatorial explosion: the product of n automata with 2 states has 2 n states!

27 Product of automata (example) p 0 The product of p 1 A B p 1 and p 0 p 1 p 0 p 0 C D p 0 is A, C p 0 B, C p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 A, D p 0 B, D p 0 If we start from A, C and after the word w we are in the state A,D we know that w contains an even number of p 0 s and odd number of p 1 s

28 Product of automata (example) Model of a system of users that have three states I(dle), R(equesting) and U(sing). We have two users for k = 1 or k = 2 Each user is represented by a simple automaton r k i k u k

29 Product of automata (example) The complete system is represented by the product of these two automata; it has 3 3 = 9 states i 1, i 2 r 1, i 2 u 1, i 2 i 1, r 2 r 1, r 2 u 1, r 2 i 1, u 2 r 1, u 2 u 1, u 2

30 The Product Construction Given A 1 = (Q 1, Σ, δ 1, q 1, F 1 ) and A 2 = (Q 2, Σ, δ 2, q 2, F 2 ) two DFAs with the same alphabet Σ we can define the product A = A 1 A 2 set of state Q = Q 1 Q 2 transition function (r 1, r 2 ).a = (r 1.a, r 2.a) intial state q 0 = (q 1, q 2 ) accepting states F = F 1 F 2

31 The Product Construction Lemma: (r 1, r 2 ).x = (r 1.x, r 2.x) We prove this by induction BASE: the statement holds for x = ɛ STEP: if the statement holds for y it holds for x = ya

32 The Product Construction Theorem: L(A 1 A 2 ) = L(A 1 ) L(A 2 ) Proof: We have (q 1, q 2 ).x = (q 1.x, q 2.x) in F iff q 1.x F 1 and q 2.x F 2, that is x L(A 1 ) and x L(A 2 ) Example: let M k be the cyclic automaton that recognizes multiple of k, such that L(M k ) = {a n k divides n}, then M 6 M 9 M 18 Notice that 6 divides k and 9 divides k iff 18 divides k

33 Product of automata It can be quite difficult to build automata directly for the intersection of two regular languages Example: build a DFA for the language that contains the subword ab twice and an even number of a s

34 Variation on the product We define A 1 A 2 as A 1 A 2 but we change the notion of accepting state (r 1, r 2 ) accepting iff r 1 F 1 or r 2 F 2 Theorem: If A 1 and A 2 are DFAs, then L(A 1 A 2 ) = L(A 1 ) L(A 2 ) Example: multiples of 3 or of 5 by taking M 3 M 5

35 Complement If A = (Q, Σ, δ, q 0, F) we define the complement automaton Ā of A as the Ā = (Q, Σ, δ, q 0, Q F) Theorem: If A is a DFA, then L(Ā) = Σ L(A) Remark: We have A A = A A

36 Languages Given an alphabet Σ A language is simply a subset of Σ Common languages, programming languages, can be seen as sets of words Definition: A language L Σ is regular iff there exists a DFA A, on the same alphabet Σ such that L = L(A) Theorem: If L 1, L 2 are regular then so are L 1 L 2, L 1 L 2, Σ L 1

37 Remark: Accessible Part of a DFA Consider the following DFA 0 0 0 q 0 1 q 1 1 q 2 0 0 q 3 1 it is clear that it accepts the same language as the DFA 0 0 q 0 1 q 1 1 which is the accessible part of the DFA The remaining states are not accessible from the start state and can be removed

38 Remark: Accessible Part of a DFA The set Acc = {q 0.x x Σ } is the set of accessible states of the DFA (states that are accessible from the state q 0 )

39 Remark: Accessible Part of a DFA Proposition: If A = (Q, Σ, δ, q 0, F) is a DFA then and A = (Q Acc, Σ, δ, q 0, F Acc) is a DFA such that L(A) = L(A ). Proof: It is clear that A is well defined and that L(A ) L(A). If x L(A) then we have q 0.x F and also q 0.x Acc. Hence q 0.x F Acc and x L(A ).

40 Automatic Theorem Proving Take Σ = {a, b}. Define L set of x Σ such that any a in x is followed by a b Define L set of x Σ such that any b in x is followed by a a Then L L = {ɛ} Intuitively if x ɛ in L we have...a......a...b... if x in L we have...b......b...a...

41 Automatic Theorem Proving We should have L L = {ɛ} since a nonempty word in L L should be infinite We can prove this automatically with automata! L is regular: write a DFA A for L L is regular: write a DFA A for L We can then compute A A and check that L L = L(A A ) = {ɛ}

42 Application: control system We have several machines working concurrently We need to forbid some sequence of actions. For instance, if we have two machines MA and MB, we may want to say that MB cannot be on when MA is on. The alphabets will contain: ona, offa, onb, offb Between ona, on2 there should be at least one offa The automaton expressing this condition is ona,onb offa onb,offa p 0 p 1 onb offb ona onb p 3 ona p 2

43 Application: control system What is interesting is that we can use the product construction to combine several conditions For instance, another condition maybe that ona should appear before onb appear. One automaton representing this condition is ona,onb q 0 ona q 1 onb q 2 We can take the product of the two automata to express the two conditions as one automaton, which may represent the control system