How to calculate reflectance and temperature using ASTER data



Similar documents
Lectures Remote Sensing

High Resolution Information from Seven Years of ASTER Data

Lake Monitoring in Wisconsin using Satellite Remote Sensing

Landsat 7 Automatic Cloud Cover Assessment

SEMI-AUTOMATED CLOUD/SHADOW REMOVAL AND LAND COVER CHANGE DETECTION USING SATELLITE IMAGERY

Review for Introduction to Remote Sensing: Science Concepts and Technology

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Atmospherically Correcting Hyperspectral Data using FLAASH 2

A remote sensing instrument collects information about an object or phenomenon within the

Integrating the Solar Spectrum

Treasure Hunt. Lecture 2 How does Light Interact with the Environment? EMR Principles and Properties. EMR and Remote Sensing

Digital Remote Sensing Data Processing Digital Remote Sensing Data Processing and Analysis: An Introduction and Analysis: An Introduction

Remote Sensing Lab: The Products Point Of View

SAMPLE MIDTERM QUESTIONS

Blackbody radiation. Main Laws. Brightness temperature. 1. Concepts of a blackbody and thermodynamical equilibrium.

Resolutions of Remote Sensing

Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission

Development of Method for LST (Land Surface Temperature) Detection Using Big Data of Landsat TM Images and AWS

Digital image processing

USE OF ALOS DATA FOR MONITORING CORAL REEF BLEACHING PI No 204 Hiroya Yamano 1, Masayuki Tamura 2, Hajime Kayanne 3

Overview of the IR channels and their applications

Passive Remote Sensing of Clouds from Airborne Platforms

Validation of a Web-Based Atmospheric Correction Tool for Single Thermal Band Instruments

MODIS IMAGES RESTORATION FOR VNIR BANDS ON FIRE SMOKE AFFECTED AREA

Selecting the appropriate band combination for an RGB image using Landsat imagery

Principle of Thermal Imaging

VIIRS-CrIS mapping. NWP SAF AAPP VIIRS-CrIS Mapping

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Atmospherically Correcting Multispectral Data Using FLAASH 2

Radiation Transfer in Environmental Science

2.3 Spatial Resolution, Pixel Size, and Scale

APPLICATION OF TERRA/ASTER DATA ON AGRICULTURE LAND MAPPING. Genya SAITO*, Naoki ISHITSUKA*, Yoneharu MATANO**, and Masatane KATO***

Sky Monitoring Techniques using Thermal Infrared Sensors. sabino piazzolla Optical Communications Group JPL

SATELLITE IMAGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA PROCESSING

WATER BODY EXTRACTION FROM MULTI SPECTRAL IMAGE BY SPECTRAL PATTERN ANALYSIS

The empirical line method for the atmospheric correction of IKONOS imagery

Remote Sensing Satellite Information Sheets Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks

Spectral Response for DigitalGlobe Earth Imaging Instruments

CALIBRATION OF SCIAMACHY IN-FLIGHT MEASURED IRRADIANCES AND RADIANCES FIRST RESULTS OF LEVEL 1 VALIDATION (CASIMIR, ENVISAT AOID 406)

APPENDIX D: SOLAR RADIATION

The USGS Landsat Big Data Challenge

Preface. Ko Ko Lwin Division of Spatial Information Science University of Tsukuba 2008

Landsat Monitoring our Earth s Condition for over 40 years

ESCI 107/109 The Atmosphere Lesson 2 Solar and Terrestrial Radiation

16 th IOCCG Committee annual meeting. Plymouth, UK February mission: Present status and near future

Assessing Cloud Spatial and Vertical Distribution with Infrared Cloud Analyzer

IR Window Transmittance Temperature Dependence

D.S. Boyd School of Earth Sciences and Geography, Kingston University, U.K.

ARM SWS to study cloud drop size within the clear-cloud transition zone

Solar Energy. Outline. Solar radiation. What is light?-- Electromagnetic Radiation. Light - Electromagnetic wave spectrum. Electromagnetic Radiation

P.M. Rich, W.A. Hetrick, S.C. Saving Biological Sciences University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045

Absorption by atmospheric gases in the IR, visible and UV spectral regions.

Client: RENOLIT Italia Srl. Work completion: 01/10/2008 (or after receipt of the weathered samples) Notes: Preliminary Report

LANDSAT 8 Level 1 Product Performance

RESULTS FROM A SIMPLE INFRARED CLOUD DETECTOR

Cloud detection and clearing for the MOPITT instrument

Demystifying CLOUD COMPUTING

Department of Engineering Enzo Ferrari University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

Using Remote Sensing Imagery to Evaluate Post-Wildfire Damage in Southern California

Data processing (3) Cloud and Aerosol Imager (CAI)

3D VISUALIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL WELLS DIRECTIONAL SURVEYS AND INTEGRATION WITH DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM)

Software requirements * :

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) and Remote Sensing

MOD09 (Surface Reflectance) User s Guide

Mapping Earth from Space Remote sensing and satellite images. Remote sensing developments from war

Received in revised form 24 March 2004; accepted 30 March 2004

Fig.1. The DAWN spacecraft

Overview. What is EMR? Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) LA502 Special Studies Remote Sensing

Data Processing Flow Chart

2 Absorbing Solar Energy

Fundamentals of modern UV-visible spectroscopy. Presentation Materials

Solar Radiation Measurement. Bruce W Forgan, WMO RAV Metrology Workshop, Melbourne, Novemberr 2011

Calibration of a High Dynamic Range, Low Light Level Visible Source

The Sentinel-4/UVN instrument on-board MTG-S

The Physics of Energy sources Renewable sources of energy. Solar Energy

How To Measure Solar Spectral Irradiance

Atmospheric correction and surface spectral unit mapping using Thermal Emission Imaging System data

Data Processing Developments at DFD/DLR. Stefanie Holzwarth Martin Bachmann, Rudolf Richter, Martin Habermeyer, Derek Rogge

How Landsat Images are Made

SOLAR ENERGY CONVERSION AND PHOTOENERGY SYSTEMS Vol. I - Solar Radiation Energy (Fundamentals) - L. Wald SOLAR RADIATION ENERGY (FUNDAMENTALS)

INVESTIGA I+D+i 2013/2014

SYNERGISTIC USE OF IMAGER WINDOW OBSERVATIONS FOR CLOUD- CLEARING OF SOUNDER OBSERVATION FOR INSAT-3D

Generation of Cloud-free Imagery Using Landsat-8

Take away concepts. What is Energy? Solar Energy. EM Radiation. Properties of waves. Solar Radiation Emission and Absorption

CBERS Program Update Jacie Frederico dos Santos Liporace AMS Kepler

Obtaining and Processing MODIS Data

Atmospheric correction of SeaWiFS imagery for turbid coastal and inland waters

Chapter Contents Page No

STAR Algorithm and Data Products (ADP) Beta Review. Suomi NPP Surface Reflectance IP ARP Product

Advanced Image Management using the Mosaic Dataset

Using Photometric Data to Derive an HR Diagram for a Star Cluster

CHAPTER 2 Energy and Earth

Hyperion Data Collection: Performance Assessment and Science Application

Solar Tracking Application

Transcription:

How to calculate reflectance and temperature using ASTER data Prepared by Abduwasit Ghulam Center for Environmental Sciences at Saint Louis University September, 2009 This instructions walk you through the calculation of top-of-the-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance at sensor and brightness temperature (also called radiometric temperature) and true kinetic temperature (also called land surface temperature, LST). At-sensor radiances measured in wavelength region is converted to Digital Numbers (DNs) using a quantification system for the sake of storage and data transfer convenience. DN values have no unit and any physical connotation, therefore, need to be converted to radiance, then to at-sensor (top-ofatmosphere) reflectance/temperature and, further, to surface reflectance and LST in order to draw quantitative analysis from remote sensing data. Part 1: Calculating spectral reflectance Step 1: DN to spectral radiance Data used here, as an example, is ASTER L1B data (version 3.0), radiometrically re-calibrated digital numbers, 8bit (1-255) for visible and near-infrared bands and 12bit (1-4095) for thermal infrared (TIR) bands (see the table 1). Where, L rad, j is ASTER spectral radiance at the sensor s aperture measured in a wavelength j; j is the ASTER band number; DN j is the unitless DN values for an individual band j; UCC j is the Unit Conversion Coefficient (W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 ) from ASTER Users Handbook.

Band# Table 1: Calculated Unit Conversion Coefficients Unit Conversion Coefficient (W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 ) High gain Normal Gain Low Gain 1 Low gain 2 1 2 3N 3B 0.676 0.708 0.423 0.423 1.688 1.415 0.862 0.862 2.25 1.89 1.15 1.15 4 5 6 7 8 9 0.1087 0.0348 0.0313 0.0299 0.0209 0.0159 0.2174 0.0696 0.0625 0.0597 0.0417 0.0318 0.290 0.0925 0.0830 0.0795 0.0556 0.0424 0.290 0.409 0.390 0.332 0.245 0.265 10 11 12 13 14 0.006822 0.006780 0.006590 0.005693 0.005225 Notes: It is worth noting that the re-calibration aimed to correct for temporal decline of the detectors responsivity between consecutive changes in the radiometric calibration coefficient (RCC) has been applied for RCC versions of 3.x or higher. ASTER TIR products with RCC versions 1.x and 2.x (2.17, 2.18 and 2.20, respectively) need to be re-calibrated for this matter using the linear function below Where, L rad, j (c) refers to the re-calibrated spectral radiance, A and B are recalibration coefficients for a band j found at http://www.science.aster.ersdac.or.jp/recal

Table 2: Maximum Radiance Values for ASTER Bands and Gains Muximum Radiance (W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 ) Band # High gain Normal Gain Low Gain 1 Low gain 2 1 2 3N 3B 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 170.8 179.0 106.8 106.8 27.5 8.8 7.9 7.55 5.27 4.02 427 358 218 218 55.0 17.6 15.8 15.1 10.55 8.04 28.17 27.75 26.97 23.30 21.38 569 477 290 290 73.3 23.4 21.0 20.1 14.06 10.72 Step 2: Spectral radiance to TOA reflectance 73.3 103.5 98.7 83.8 62.0 67.0 ASTER at-sensor reflectance (ρ TOA, also called as planetary reflectance or apparent reflectance or TOA reflectance) for a specific band j is calcualted using the standard Landsat equation as: Where:

= Unitless planetary reflectance = Spectral radiance at the sensor's aperture = = Earth-Sun distance in astronomical units from an Excel file which is calculated using the below EXCEL equation (Achard and D Souza 1994; Eva and Lambin, 1998) or interpolated from values listed in Table 3 Mean solar exoatmospheric irradiances from Table 4 = Wavelength, corresponds to the band number j = Solar zenith angle in degrees (zenith angle = 90 solar elevation angle), which is found in the ASTER header file Table 3 Earth-Sun in Astronomical Units 1.98331 74.99446 152 1.01403 227 1.01281 305.99253 15.98365 91.99926 166 1.01577 242 1.00969 319.98916 32.98536 106 1.00353 182 1.01667 258 1.00566 335.98608 46.98774 121 1.00756 196 1.01646 274 1.00119 349.98426 60.99084 135 1.01087 213 1.01497 288.99718 365.98333 Referenced from Landsat 7 ETM+ Data User s Handbook The calculation of E SUN is the same for whatever sensor you are using, as it is simply the convolution of the band's spectral response function (A) with the Extraterrestrial Solar Spectral Irradiance function (B). A for each ASTER band can be obtained from: http://www.science.aster.ersdac.or.jp/en/about_aster/sensor/ or download here B can be obtained from: http://staff.aist.go.jp/s.tsuchida/aster/cal/info/solar/ or download here Using this standard approach the calculated E SUN for each ASTER band is given in Table 4:

Table 4: ASTER Solar Spectral Irradiances (W m -2 µm -1 ) Band# Smith: E SUN Thome et al (A): E SUN Thome et al (B): E SUN 1 2 3N 3B 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1845.99 1555.74 1119.47 231.25 79.81 74.99 68.66 59.74 56.92 1847 1553 1118 232.5 80.32 74.92 69.20 59.82 57.32 1848 1549 1114 225.4 86.63 81.85 74.85 66.49 59.85 Notes: Smith: Calculated by interpolating the ASTER spectral response functions to 1nm and convolving them with the 1nm step WRC data Thome et al (A): Calcualted by convolving the ASTER spectral response functions them with the WRC data [Unknown whether these where both interpolated to 1nm or whether a subsample of WRC data values at the ASTER spectral response function step intervals were used in the convolution] Thome et al (B): Calculated using spectral irradiance values dervied using MODTRAN. Step 3: TOA reflectance to surface reflectance Surface reflectance is calculated using empirical methods when ground truthing is available by correlating the field measured surface reflectance with synchronous pixel value, or radiative transfer models such as MODTRAN, 6S (Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, Vermote, et al., 1997), etc. It is recommended to use surface reflectance products for quantitative remote sensing analysis, however, TOA reflectance based outcome is also acceptable due to the fact that land surface reflectance retrieval is complicated.

Part 2: Calculating temperature Step 1: DNs to radiance Refer to Part1 Step1 to convert DNs to radiance for thermal bands. There is no difference between converting DNs to radiance of thermal or optical data. Step 2: Spectral radiance to TOA brightness temperature Planck s Radiance Function Where, C 1 =1.19104356 10-16 W m 2 ; C 2 =1.43876869 10-2 m K In the absence of atmospheric effects, T of a ground object can be theoretically determined by inverting the Planck s function as follows: This equation can be reformed as Let K 1 = C 1 /λ 5, and K 2 = C 2 /λ, and satellite measured radiant intensity B λ (T) = L λ, then above mentioned equation is collapsed into an equation similar to the one used to calculate brightness temperature from Landsat TM image (detailes here) Therefore, K 1 and K 2 become a coefficient determined by effective wavelength of a satellite sensor. For example, effective wavelength of ASTER band 10, λ=8.291

µm = 8.291 10-6 m, we can have K 1 = C 1 /λ 5 = 1.19104356 10-16 W m 2 / (8.291 10-6 m) 5 = 3040136402 W m -2 m -1 = 3040.136402 W m -2 µm -1 K 2 = C 2 /λ = 1.43876869 10-2 m K / 8.291 10-6 m = 1735.337945K The method may be extended to the rest the ASTER thermal bands as shown in the following table. * Unit for Unit Conversion Coefficients (UCC) is W m -2 sr -1 µm -1 ) Table 5 ASTER thermal bands (referenced ASTER L1B Manual Ver.3.0) Bands Bandpass Effective (µm) Wavelength (µm) UCC K 1 (W m -2 µm -1 ) K 2 (K) 10 8.125-8.475 8.291 0.006882 3040.136402 1735.337945 11 8.475-8.825 8.634 0.006780 2482.375199 1666.398761 12 8.925-9.275 9.075 0.006590 1935.060183 1585.420044 13 10.25-10.95 10.657 0.005693 866.468575 1350.069147 14 10.95-11.65 11.318 0.005225 641.326517 1271.221673