GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ANTALYA KARSTIC ROCK MASSES



Similar documents
Numerical analysis of boundary conditions to tunnels

Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko. Basic Geophysical Concepts

FAN group includes NAMVARAN UPSTREAM,

SYDNEY SANDSTONE AND SHALE PARAMETERS FOR TUNNEL DESIGN

APPENDIX 3.0-E Feasibility Geotechnical Pit Slope Evaluation Kitsault Project British Columbia, Canada

Why measure in-situ stress?

7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.


A Model for Determining the Breaking Characteristics of Immediate Roof in Longwall Mines

SHORE A DUROMETER AND ENGINEERING PROPERTIES

Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

DIMENSIONING TUNNEL SUPPORT BY DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Parameters That Influence Seismic Velocity Conceptual Overview of Rock and Fluid Factors that Impact Seismic Velocity and Impedance

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 5 : Geophysical Exploration [ Section 5.1 : Methods of Geophysical Exploration ]

TECHNICAL NOTE: SI 01 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF INSPECTION BODIES FOR SITE INVESTIGATION

DETERMINATION OF SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS PERFORMING THE PLATE BEARING TEST

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

INVITATION FOR TENDER FOR SUPPLY OF EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

The earthquake source

Validation of Cable Bolt Support Design in Weak Rock Using SMART Instruments and Phase 2

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF AN EARTH DAM FOUNDATION IN TUNISIA

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ROCK MECHANICS CHAMBER OF MINES OF SOUTH AFRICA CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PART 1 ROCK MECHANICS THEORY

NuGeneration Ltd Site Investigations

GUIDELINES FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OF BRIDGE STRUCTURES. Materials Engineering Report No M (Supersedes Report No.

Chapter Outline. Mechanical Properties of Metals How do metals respond to external loads?

Nuevas tendencias de la Minería Subterránea profunda Planeación, operación y estabilización del macizo rocoso

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION

Empirical Correlation of Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Primary Wave Velocity of Malaysian Granites

Exploration. Exploration methods

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ROCK MECHANICS CHAMBER OF MINES OF SOUTH AFRICA CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PART 4

Lists of estimated quantities to be performed and prices Estimated quantities to be performed. Prices

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

Application Study of FLAC in Analysis of Slope Stability

MCE380: Measurements and Instrumentation Lab. Chapter 9: Force, Torque and Strain Measurements

Satish Pullammanappallil and Bill Honjas. Optim LLC, Reno, Nevada, USA. John N. Louie. J. Andrew Siemens. Siemens & Associates, Bend, Oregon, USA

GEOPHYSICAL TESTING OF ROCK AND ITS RELATIONSHIPS TO PHYSICAL PROPERTIES FINAL REPORT

ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

Mechanical Properties of Metals Mechanical Properties refers to the behavior of material when external forces are applied

An Integrated Rock Catalog for E&P Geotechnologists

Mechanical Properties - Stresses & Strains

Figure CPT Equipment

ON THE INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST (SCPT) RESULTS

RocSupport. Tutorial Manual. Rock support interaction and deformation analysis for tunnels in weak rock Rocscience Inc.

Stress Strain Relationships

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.

USING TOPOLOGY OPTIMISATION IN TUNNEL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN

Anirudhan I.V. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS NQF LEVEL 3 OUTCOME 1 - LOADING SYSTEMS TUTORIAL 3 LOADED COMPONENTS

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

Brief Review of Global Earth Velocity Structures and Seismology

RESERVOIR GEOSCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Pore pressure. Ordinary space

Table of Contents 10.1 GENERAL

1 of 37 Erik Eberhardt UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition

TIE-31: Mechanical and thermal properties of optical glass

Study Guide Questions Earth Structure and Plate Tectonics

AEG-ASCE SHORT COURSE

Relationship between the percentage of clay with liquid limit, plastic limit and plastic index in four different soils texture class

ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFICATE LEVEL

Solution for Homework #1

Periodical meeting CO2Monitor. Leakage characterization at the Sleipner injection site

AN EXPLANATION OF JOINT DIAGRAMS

Project Layout & Design Features of the Project

MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES HNC/D PRELIMINARY LEVEL TUTORIAL 1 BASIC STUDIES OF STRESS AND STRAIN

Soil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

Seismic Waves Practice

Risk oriented design and construction of tunnels

SITE INVESTIGATION FACILITIES

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

Numerical Analysis of Transient Phenomena in Electromagnetic Forming Processes

Virtual Reality Scientific Visualisation - A Solution for Big Data Analysis of the Block Cave Mining System

Raghu Satyanarayana, Ph.D. Geotechnical/Software Consultant ESC, Inc.

Overview of Topics. Stress-Strain Behavior in Concrete. Elastic Behavior. Non-Linear Inelastic Behavior. Stress Distribution.

Ground investigation and Eurocode 7: A Scottish perspective

Pore Radius and Permeability Prediction from Sonic Velocity

QUESTION TO AUDIENCE

Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as Flysch. Paul Marinos and Evert Hoek

USING THE POINT LOAD TEST TO DETERMINE THE UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF COAL MEASURE ROCK

Abstract. Keywords. Pouya Salari 1, Gholam Reza Lashkaripour 2*, Mohammad Ghafoori 2. * lashkaripour@um.ac.ir

ENGINEERING GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION OF HYDROPOWER PROJECTS CHAPTER 11 - ARCH DAMS

Tensile Testing of Steel

Numerical Simulation on Supporting of Large Section Open-off Cut and Its Stability

Reservoir Modelling and Interpretation with Lamé s Parameters: A Grand Banks Case Study

Establishing a site specific mining. geotechnical logging g atlas?...

Geotechnical site characterization through geoelectrics

Which physics for full-wavefield seismic inversion?

STRESS AND DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF LINEAR ELASTIC BARS IN TENSION

Figure 1. Submarine cable plough

Transcription:

GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ANTALYA KARSTIC ROCK MASSES Dr. Evrim Sopacı Consulting Engineer/Temelsu

T U R K E Y The city of Antalya is built on and surrounded by one of the largest (600 km 2 ) and thickest (up to 250 m) deposits of tufa (i.e. calcium carbonate precipitated from cool-water springs) in the Mediterranean region, or elsewhere. Tufa, rather than the more traditional travertine, which is reserved for hotspring deposits (>20C), derives from Tophus, originally used by Pliny to describe a porous rock. 2

Geotechnical Characterization of the Antalya Karstic Rock Masses 3

Why is Tufa significant in the field of engineering geology? missing geotechnical database unknown controlling parameters of the strength and the deformability characteristics of the Antalya tufa rocks an engineering classification pertaining to the Antalya tufa rocks is missing in the literature the engineering classification to produce rock specific design parameters (i.e., shear strength parameters, deformation modulus, etc.). 4

Geotechnical Characterization of the Antalya Karstic Rock Masses b- c- d- e- a- a- PHYTOHERM FRAMESTONE b- MICROCRYSTALLINE c- PHYTOHERM BOUNDSTONE d- INTRACLAST e- PHYTOCLAST 5

Geotechnical Characterization of the Antalya Karstic Rock Masses Laboratory and field tests Uniaxial Compressive Strength Test Seismic Refraction Tomography Triaxial Compressive Strength Test Pressuremeter Test Indirect TensileStrength Test Unit weight and Porosity determination 6

Results of Lab Tests of the Antalya tufa rock types Uniaxial compressive strength test Brazilian tensile strength test Tufa types σ c (MPa) E (GPa) ν σ t (MPa) No. of Std. Mean Mean Std. Mean Std. No. of Std. Mean sample dev. dev. dev. sample dev. Microcrystalline 10 18.56 7.94 8.44 4.57 0.09 0.04 11 3.10 1.20 Intraclast tufa 3 4.66 1.34 1.54 0.61 0.29 0.23 - - - Phytoherm framestone 13 7.76 5.35 4.41 2.99 0.11 0.05 9 1.40 0.80 Tufa type Porosity (%) Unit weight (kn/m 3 ) Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Microcrystalline tufa 10.6 3.9 20.9 1.3 Phytoherm framestone 14.0 5.6 20.8 0.9 Intraclast tufa 14.0 5.9 18.6 2.4 7

Results of Lab Tests of the Antalya tufa rock types P-wave velocity (m/s) S-wave velocity (m/s) To (s) Type / Parameters Mean ± St.d. Mean ± St.d. Mean ± St.d. Intraclast 1836 ± 496 693 ± 210 0.33 ± 0.09 Phytoherm framestone 2350 ± 443 930 ± 71 0.23 ± 0.02 Microcrystalline tufa 2299 ± 437 1234 ± 311 0.21 ± 0.04 Tufa type c (MPa) φ ( ) m i Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Mean Std. Dev. Microcrystalline tufa 3.41 2.51 37.8 12.1 15 9 Phytoherm framestone 3.21 1.12 33.1 18.4 6 3 Phytoclast 1.57 0.52 31.6 10.9 9 5 8

Results of Lab Tests of the Antalya tufa rock types Borehole Location Depth (m) Lithology PL (kpa) PLn (kpa) E (MPa) BH-4 Lara 2.50 785 627 5.70 BH-4 Lara 10.0 2000 2000 99.5 BH-4 Lara 13.0 Intraclast tufa 2000 2000 43.2 BH-7 Lara 8.00 588 431 5.54 BH-8 Konyaaltı 1.50 2452 1978 59.6 BH-2 Lara 3.50 1569 1215 12.3 BH-2 Lara 9.50 2000 2000 95.3 BH-3 Lara 2.50 Phytoherm framestone 2000 2000 86.4 BH-3 Lara 6.00 1765 1411 14.2 BH-6 Lara 1.50 2059 1603 98.4 Mean ± one standard deviation Intraclast tufa 1565 ± 826 1407 ± 805 42.7 ± 39.6 Phytoherm framestone 1878 ± 207 1646 ± 351 43.6 ± 43.3 9

Controlling parameters In regards to the factor(s) controlling the Antalya tufa rock strength or behavior, porosity has been observed to be the most probable candidate responsible for the variations Analyzing the regression results of the geomechanical parameters, it seems that the Antalya tufa rock may be better characterized by using strength parameters, namely, uniaxial compressive and tensile strength, together with index parameters such as unit weight 10

GSI 75 ± 5 40 ± 5 30 ± 5 20 ± 5 20 ± 5 Microcrystalline tufa Phyotherm framestone Phyotherm boundstone Phytoclast tufa/intraclast tufa 11

Rock Mass Parameters Microcrystalline tufa Phytoherm framestone Phytoclast tufa Intact rock strength (MPa) 18.56 7.76 5.50 Hoek-Brown constant, mi 15 6 9 Geological Strength Index 75±5 40±5 20±5 Intact rock modulus, Ei (GPa) 8.44 4.41 2.26 Hoek-Brown constant, mb 6.142 0.704 0.517 Hoek-Brown constant, s 0.0622 0.0013 0.0001 Constant, a 0.501 0.511 0.544 Deformation modulus (GPa) 6.899 0.704 0.103 Mohr-Coulomb fit c (MPa) 1.576 0.277 0.146 φ ( ) 41.34 23.49 20.68 12

Thank you... 13