Overview of Topsøe Synthesis Technologies for BTL and bio-sng

Similar documents
From solid fuels to substitute natural gas (SNG) using TREMP

Fuels from Renewable Sources. John Bøgild Hansen - Haldor Topsøe

John Bøgild Hansen, Haldor Topsøe. Energinet.dk s VE gas dag 2011 En industriaktørs synspunkter

Options for tar reforming in biomass gasification. Klas J. Andersson, Poul Erik Højlund Nielsen - IFC 2012

Haldor Topsøe Catalysing Your Business

TIGAS Topsøe s s Improved Gasoline Synthesis

Concepts in Syngas Manufacture

Viresco Energy s Advanced Gasification Technology

SKI Coal Gasification Technology. Feb. 23, 2012

Carbona Gasification Technologies Biomass Gasification Plant in Skive

Gasförmige und flüssige synthetische Energieträger aus Biomasse Stand der Entwicklungen an der TU Wien. Hermann HOFBAUER, TU Wien

Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology at a Glance

Olefins from Syngas Potential for bio-based applications Dr. Thomas Wurzel, Lurgi GmbH. New Biofuels rd-24th June 2010, Berlin, Germany

BIOMASS RESEARCH at ECN. Bram van der Drift

Large Scale Methanol Production from Natural Gas

CONTENTS. ZVU Engineering a.s., Member of ZVU Group, WASTE HEAT BOILERS Page 2

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology Stoffliche Nutzung der Braunkohle

Thermochemical Upgrading Workshop Coal to Liquids (F-T) Via Gasification

CO2 enhanced coal gasification and BlueCoal new Clean Coal Technologies proposals from Poland

Syngas Purification Units

Tutkimuksen merkitys menestyvässä liiketoiminnassa- Innovaatiosta tuotteeksi

Biomass gasification development of attractive business cases

Fischer-Tropsch Diesel from Solid Biomass

Latest developments in ammonia production technology

B0401 Abstract 029 Oral Presentation Session B04 Innovative Applications and Designs - Tuesday, July 1, :00 h

How To Run A Power Plant

Mcllvaine Hot Topic Hour Air pollution control for gas turbines

BorsodChem MCHZ, Czech Republic. 6,000 Nm 3 /h HTCR Topsøe Hydrogen Plant A Case Story: 18 Months from Engineering to Operation

An Update on RTI s Warm Syngas Cleanup Demonstration Project

Challenges and Possibilities Thermal gasification

How To Make A High Co 2 Gas Blend

Syngas Furnace Tubeskin Temperature Measurement

Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming with CO 2 Capture

Energy Savings in Methanol Synthesis : Use of Heat Integration Techniques and Simulation Tools.

Development of large-scale H 2 storage and transportation technology with Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC)

Hydrogen from Natural Gas via Steam Methane Reforming (SMR)

From forest to gas in the transmission system. Ulf Molén,

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Development at Topsoe Fuel Cell A/S

MHI Air-Blown IGCC Technology & Application to Chinese Project

Michael Williams Gasification Technologies Council, 28 th October Smaller scale Fischer-Tropsch enables biomass-to-liquids

Drying of Woody Biomass. Process Engineering / GEA Barr-Rosin

Making Coal Use Compatible with Measures to Counter Global Warming

LANDFILL GAS TO ENERGY- COMBINED ENGINE AND ORC-PROCESS

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

New Bio Solutions. DONG Energy. Pyroneer November May 2013

Sixth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration

Power Generation through Surface Coal Gasification

Experience with co-combustion of biomass and waste in coal-fired power plants

CHOREN. Development of integrated biomass supply chains in South East Asia. Tsukuba, 28 rd of October 2009

High Flux Steam Reforming

Executive Summary. Catalyst Testing Results

Innovative processes for thermochemical SNG production from biomass

Natural Gas as a Chemical Industry Fuel and Feedstock: Past, Present, Future (and Far Future)

Valmet biotechnologies and pyrolysis status update. Joakim Autio Product manager, Pyrolysis systems Valmet

Process Technology. Advanced bioethanol production and renewable energy generation from ligno-cellulosic materials, biomass waste and residues

Power to Gas - state of the art and perspectives

Proven autothermal reforming technology for modern largescale methanol plants

Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

Facts about gas physical properties

Morphysorb /Genosorb Physical solvents for acid gas removal

Simulation of a base case for future IGCC concepts with CO 2 capture

Evolving Gasification technology to provide Innovative Low Carbon Solutions for the European Market

AMMONIA AND UREA PRODUCTION

Green Gas on the Road Bram van der Drift

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 33: Combustion air calculation

Enhanced power and heat generation from biomass and municipal waste. Torsten Strand. Siemens Power Generation Industrial Applications

Methanol aus Biomasse- Rohstoff für die chemische Industrie

CO 2 Conversion to Methane Project

The heat plant Future biorefinery. Panndagarna 2015 Västerås, April

Coal Gasification & Fischer-Tropsch

Upgrading of Heavy Oils with FLEXICOKING. ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company Tim Hilbert

SNOX flue gas treatment for boilers burning high-sulphur fuels

Gasification of Biomass for Syngas generation at ETC

VK series Sulphuric acid catalysts

Smart Energy Systems Energy Efficient Buildings and the Design of future Sustainable Energy Systems

Morris Argyle Assistant Professor Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. School of Energy Resources Symposium Casper, WY February 28, 2007

VALIDATION, MODELING, AND SCALE-UP OF CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION WITH OXYGEN UNCOUPLING

Impact of coal quality and gasifier technology on IGCC performance

Biomass Syngas Production Technology by Gasification for Liquid Fuel and Other Chemicals

Sulphur in Nigerian Diesel

Overview of Integrated Coal Gasification Combined-cycle Technology Using Low-rank Coal

Hybrid Power Generations Systems, LLC

Hydrogen Production from Biogas by Sorption-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming (SE-SMR)

Natural Gas. Natural Gas... p. 57 to 59. fin-house f Training... p. 61

The Future of Coal-Based Power Generation With CCS UN CCS Summit James Katzer MIT Energy Initiative web.mit.edu/coal/

Petroleum Refinery Hydrogen Production Unit: Exergy and Production Cost Evaluation

UOP Gas Processing. Realizing the Value of Your Natural Gas and Synthesis Gas Resources

Siemens Gasification Project Update and Lessons Learned

Key challenges for industrial use of research infrastructure Alfons Molenbroek

TODAY S THERMAL OXIDIZER SOLUTIONS TO MEET TOMORROW S CHALLENGES

Haldor Topsøe Catalyzing your business

COAL GASIFICATION AND CO 2 CAPTURE

Transcription:

Overview of Topsøe Synthesis Technologies for BTL and bio-sng Thoa Nguyen and Finn Joensen Haldor Topsøe A/S Introduction to Haldor Topsøe 1

Outline Haldor Topsøe Brief intro The TIGAS technology The liquid fuel scenario The TIGAS process Process Demonstration SNG catalysts and technology Process References Impurities CAPEX example Company facts Established 1940 Ownership: Haldor Topsøe Holding A/S (100%) Headquarters in Lyngby, Denmark Annual turnover (2011): ~587 MM EUR (>4.4 billion DKK) Number of employees ~2100 (R&D >300) 2

Synergies - the Topsøe way Process design Founded on the belief that we build and retain a position as second to none in catalysis through applied fundamental Sales research. & R&D Engineering Support This notion still governs the company s business activities. Catalyst production Catalyst supply Catalysts developed in-house Catalysts manufactured in own facilities Frederikssund, Denmark Houston, Texas Frederikssund Houston 3

Scope of supply Process licenses Catalysts Engineering services Basic engineering Detailed engineering Purchasing Site supervision Erection Start-up & test run Equipment supply Training of operators Process simulators Technologies and business areas Ammonia technology Fertilizer industry Hydrogen and Hydroprocessing technology Refining industry Environmental technology, WSA, DeNOx and SNOX Environmental and power industries Synthesis gas / methanol / DME / SNG / gas to liquid technologies Petrochemical industries, (methanol) Energy and environmental industries 4

From Syngas to Synfuels -The TIGAS Process The Fuel Challenge: Gree n - Meeting the Ever-Increasing Demand for Fuel 5

1972: Oil will run out within 30 years..2012: Oil will run out within 30 years Peak Oil World Oil Reserves Still more difficult to access/process Higher production costs Increasing demand Higher fuel prices Synfuels become attractive Coal Natural Gas Biomass Waste 6

Methanol Gasoline, Basic Equations 2H 2 + CO = CH 3 OH CH 3 OH = CH 2 + H 2 O 1 t MeOH 0.4725 t CH 2 (14/32) Approx. 0.4 t gasoline ; 0.05 t LPG Typical Product Distribution C n 7

TIGAS MTG Topsøe Integrated Gasoline Synthesis Methanol To Gasoline Synthesis Gas Methanol MeOH/DME C 3 -C 4 DME Gasoline Gasoline Simple process layout Water No methanol condensation / re-evaporation Simple Selective Efficient Flexible Low recycle rates Moderate pressure Combined MeOH/DME Synthesis H (kj/mol) 2H 2 + CO = CH 3 OH 90.7 2CH 3 OH = CH 3 OCH 3 + H 2 O 23.6 CO + H 2 O = CO 2 + H 2 41.1 3H 2 + 3CO = CH 3 OCH 3 + CO 2 8

Syngas Eq. Conversion vs. Pressure 100 80 MeOH / DME T = 250 C Feed Gas (mol%): Conversion (H 2 +CO) 60 40 MeOH H 2 = 51 CO = 48 CO 2 = 1 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Pressure (bar g) TIGAS Topsøe Improved Gasoline Synthesis 100 80 MeOH / DME 60 MeOH 40 20 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 9

Topsoe Demonstration Plant, 9000 hrs Historical Perspective T/d & kg/h Pilots H-ZSM-5 10

(Waste) Wood to Gasoline Demonstration Project Green Gasoline from Wood Using Carbona Gasification and Topsoe TIGAS Processes Wood to Gasoline Demonstration Project Green Gasoline From Wood Using Carbona Gasification and Topsoe TIGAS Processes BIOMASS BIOMASS GASIFIER TAR REFORMER TAR REFORMER GASIFIER Gas MeOH/DME Gasoline Cleaning http://www.energy.gov/news2009/releases.htm ASH ASH OXYGEN 11

Pilot Plant Studies Impact of Process Conditions Product Distribution RON/MON Data Kinetic Modeling Ageing Studies Gasoline post-treatment Durene isomerization Octane boosting Pseudo-Adiabatic Pilot (DK) 12

Reaction Mechanism MeOH/DME HC-Pool C 3 H 6 (C n H 2n ) + H 2 O C 3 H 6 (C n H 2n ) + MeOH/DME Homologation + H 2 O + H 2 O MeOH(DME) C n H 2n+2 C n H 2n Dehydrocyclization C n H 2n C n H 2n C n H 2n+2 C n H 2n+2 GSK-10 Kinetic Model Oxy O O O O O k k1 2 O A k 3 P k 4 N k 5 I k 6 LPG Total Weight Fraction of Lump O 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 Oxygenates Measured Calculated 0 0 20 40 60 80 Data Point 13

Fit of T-Profiles from Pilot Syngas Eq. Conversion vs. Pressure 100 80 MeOH / DME MeOH / DME T = 250 C Feed Gas (mol%): Conversion (H 2 +CO) 60 40 Enabling Air-Blown Gasification MeOH MeOH H 2 = 51 CO = 48 CO 2 = 1 20 40 % N 2 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Pressure (bar g) 14

Skive District Heating/Power Plant 16 MW th Gedankenexperiment 2 atm (Air) N 2 16 MW th 7 MW th ~ 100 bbl/d 15

Gedankenexperiment 20,600 inhabitants 6000 households 6000 pass. cars 30 km/d 11.3 km/l 15,900 l Gasoline/d ~ 100 bbl/d www.topsoe.com Conclusions The prospects of steadily increasing Thank you for your attention! oil prices, increasing global demand for automotive fuels coupled with environmental and energy security concerns make synfuels part of the Any questions? equation to secure future energy supply. In this context the TIGAS technology offers versatile, selective and efficient routes for the conversion of syngas to produce a Gosh I m hungry clean gasoline product directly adaptable to existing fuel infrastructure. 16

SNG catalysts and technology 17

Topsøe technologies for coal conversion Air Air separation unit O 2 Sulphur recovery (WSA) Sour gas Wet Sulphuric Acid (instead of Klaus) HTAS licenses: Methanol DME Ammonia SNG Hydrogen TIGAS Coal Gasification Sour Shift Acid gas removal Polishing Synthesis (TREMP TM ) CO 2 Steam Substitute Natural Gas (SNG) What it is: Essentially methane generated from syngas methanation. Raw materials: Syngas generated from gasification of biomass, waste, coal, petcoke Markets: - Where NG resources limited or non-existing - Where biomass, waste, coal and/or petcoke abundant - Strategic energy sourcing (independence, security) - To NG pipeline, LNG or as fuel gas 18

Typical specification for SNG Mole% CH 4 94-98 CO 2 0.2 3 H 2 0.1 2 CO <100 ppm N 2 + Ar 1-3 HHV, KJ/Nm 3 37,000-40,000 SNG fundamentals and references Methanation to SNG CO + 3H 2 CH 4 + H 2 O CO 2 + 4H 2 CH 4 + 2H 2 O (+206 kj/mol) (+165 kj/mol) +200 references in steam reforming, using Nickel-based catalysts (front-end ammonia, hydrogen, methanol, other) More than 50 years of Topsøe experience Sintering stability Methanation activity Carbon formation (whisker, gum) 19

Signature features of methanation via TREMP Feed Gas Cooler Superheater HP boiler HP boiler Cooling Train SNG Water High exit temperature (700 C) Haldor Topsøe TREMP process 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 Equlibrium curve Operating window +100 C Recycle reduced 50% Lower investment Lower operational cost HP steam T, C 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % CH4, dry Product spec 20

Large temperature increase in 1st reactor benefits recycle cost Inlet T ( C) Exit T ( C) Recycle work (relative) Compressor CAPEX (relative) Base Case 260 700 1 1 Effect of lower exit-temperature Effect of higher inlet-temperature Case 1 260 625 1.6 1.3 Case 2 260 450 4 2.3 Case 3 330 700 1.2 1.1 Case 4 330 625 1.8 1.4 Case 5 330 450 5.8 2.9 For TREMP compressor cost is 20% of total investment SNG references Plant Client Capacity Nm 3 /d Year ADAM1 / IRMA NFE, Jülich, Germany 4.800 1979-1985 ADAM2 demonstration NFE, Jülich, Germany 48.000 1980-1983 Selected for: SRC2 Stearns Roger, US 1.7 mio 1977-81 (Cancelled 81) Power Holding Power Holding,Illinois, US 4.3 mio 2006 Cline Group Illinois Basin, US ~ 3.4 mio 2008 Lake Charles Lake Charles Cogen. 2008 Non-disclosed Illinois, US ~2.4 mio 2006 Engineering studies: 2 clients US Non-disclosed Ca. 5 mio. 2006/2008 Projects: Gobigas (Bio-based) Gothenburg, Sweden 0.24 mio. 2007 Undisclosed Illinois, US 2009 Qinghua China 4 mio 2009 Undisclosed (Bio-based) Sweden 2010 POSCO South Korea 2,25 mio 2010 21

Operating experience with MCR-2X Unit Product flow, Nm 3 /hr P, bar Operation, (MSCFH) (psig) hours ADAM I 200 (7.5) 28 (406) 2300 ADAM II 3000 (112) 47 (682) 6000 IRMA (Isoterm) 200 (7.5) 28 (406) 1400 Small Pilots 15 (0.6) 30 (435) >25000 Topsoe Pilot 12 (0.45) 30 (435) >20000 More than 55000 demonstration hours Catalyst experience ADAM 1 ADAM 2 Totally more than 50000 hours of operation in demo plants and pilots 22

High temperature methanation catalyst (MCR) Slight modifications have given an even more stable catalyst 700 Temperature (ºC) 600 500 400 300 1 h 358 h 1028 h 0 50 100 Distance from inlet (cm) ~1980 2010 Results from Jülich / Wesseling demonstation Reactor designs Isothermal reactors Salt Boiling water Adiabatic reactors Shell cooled Gas cooled reactors Catalyst MCR-2 Demonstrated up to 800 deg. C More shapes MCR-4 23

Low-temperature methanation (PK-7R) Used in all Ammonia plants CO and CO 2 are a poison for an ammonia catalyst Used in some of the old H 2 plants CO and CO 2 are a poison for some hydro treating catalysts Haldor Topsøe has ~150 references worldwide Requirement to the feed gas composition Module equations for entrained flow and fixed bed gasifiers M E H CO CO 2 2 CO2 3.00 H CO O C H 2C H M F 2 2 2 2 4 2 6 3.00 CO CO O C H C H 2 2 2 4 2 6 24

Feed gas variation harm product quality Feed into methanation plant Module M E H CO 2 2 CO CO 2 3.00 Module 2.90 2.95 3.00 3.05 3.10 H2 74.01 74.33 74.60 74.95 75.24 CO 24.44 24.12 23.85 23.50 23.21 CO2 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Dry SNG product CH4 92.4 93.1 93.4 92.3 88.5 H2 2.1 2.5 3.1 5.1 9.0 CO2 2.83 1.75 0.88 0.08 0.00 HHV 37.0 37.3 37.5 37.3 36.3 Wobbe 48.4 49.4 50.1 50.7 50.2 Example: Feed gas 30 barg, Methane 0%, 0,75% inerts Requirement to the feed gas impurities Examples for poisons for methanation catalyst Chlorine Arsenic Oxygen Sulphur COS H 2 S CS 2 C 4 H 4 S CH 4 S 25

CAPEX estimate Total capacity: Total price: 1,400,000,000 Nm3/a approximately 1.5 billion EUR Syngas generation etc. 65% Rectisol 15% TREMP 10% Sour shift 5% SRU 5% Total 100% (install cost, all inclusive) Summary of TREMP benefits High capacity: Train size above 200,000 Nm 3 /h Max. value of released energy: 85% high-pressure steam (540 C, 140 bar) 140 bar g @ 540 C Up to 3.8 kg / Nm 3 of SNG Minimum recycle flow Reduced CAPEX, OPEX (small compressor, heat exchangers electricity) Possible elimination of recycle compressor for methane-containing feed gas (once-through). Reduced CAPEX and OPEX, very high reliability High Quality: In-process compensation for feed-gas module variation Combining high performance with robust process No continuous emissions to the atmosphere. Clean Process Condensate (can be used as make-up for the steam system) 26