Decaffeination of Raw, Green Coffee Beans Using Supercritical CO 2



Similar documents
Remediation of VOC Contaminated Groundwater

Production of R-134a

Acetaldehyde Production by Ethanol Dehydrogenation

Optimization of Natural Gas Processing Plants Including Business Aspects

The paper addresses the boil-off in the cryogenic industry and details the specifics of it when applied to vehicle LNG tanks.

TABLE OF CONTENT

IBP 2778_10 HIGH EFFICIENCY ON CO2 REMOVAL IN NATURAL GAS WITH UCARSOL SOLVENTS Thiago V. Alonso 1. Abstract. 1. Introduction

Lecture 9 Solving Material Balances Problems Involving Non-Reactive Processes

CHAPTER 7: REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

EXTRACTION OF OIL FROM ALGAE BY SOLVENT EXTRACTION AND OIL EXPELLER METHOD

APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS TUTORIAL 1 REVISION OF ISENTROPIC EFFICIENCY ADVANCED STEAM CYCLES

How To Make A High Co 2 Gas Blend

5.2. Vaporizers - Types and Usage

Putting a chill on global warming

SEAR Wastewater Treatment: Contaminant Removal and Material Recovery

Everest. Leaders in Vacuum Booster Technology

Modelling and Simulation of the Freezing Systems and Heat Pumps Using Unisim Design

LifeASSURE PFS Series Filter Cartridge Integrity Testing

Forgotten savings: Heat recovery from surface blowdown

Wastewater Reuse. Typical treated wastewater is:

POSSIBILITY FOR MECHANICAL VAPOR RE-COMPRESSRION FOR STEAM BASED DRYING PROCESSES

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NGCC AND COAL-FIRED STEAM POWER PLANTS WITH INTEGRATED CCS AND ORC SYSTEMS

Dehydration. Dehydration UNIT. operations. bioprocess plants

DEVELOPMENT OF A TWIN SCREW EXPRESSOR AS A THROTTLE VALVE REPLACEMENT FOR WATER-COOLED CHILLERS

Saeid Rahimi. Effect of Different Parameters on Depressuring Calculation Results. 01-Nov Introduction. Depressuring parameters

Dry-out Design Considerations and Practices for Cryogenic Gas Plants

Differentiation Summary. Revolutionizing Water Clean-Up Opportunities

Managing Floor Drains and Flammable Traps

LECTURE 28 to 29 ACCUMULATORS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Innovation and Progress in Water Treatment Technology

Petroleum Refinery Hydrogen Production Unit: Exergy and Production Cost Evaluation

HEAT RECOVERY OPTIONS FOR DRYERS AND OXIDIZERS

Research on the Air Conditioning Water Heater System

CHAPTER 7 THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS. Blank

RecoPhos Bench Scale Reactor

CHAPTER 7 THE DEHYDRATION AND SWEETENING OF NATURAL GAS

by: Juan Pedrerol Gallego Repsol Quimica, S.A. Tarragona, Spain Salvador Ruiz Lopez Repsol Quimica, S.A. Tarragona, Spain-

Orange Fruit Processing

a) Use the following equation from the lecture notes: = ( J K 1 mol 1) ( ) 10 L

COMPARISON OF PROCESS FLOWS: FLUID BED COMBUSTOR AND GLASSPACK

RULE DRY CLEANERS USING SOLVENT OTHER THAN PERCHLOROETHYLENE

Water hammering in fire fighting installation

Dynamic Models Towards Operator and Engineer Training: Virtual Environment

Chapter 3. Table E-1. Equilibrium data for SO 2 at 1 atm and 20 o C. x y

TABLE OF CONTENT


GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON FOR WATER & WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Lecture 12: Exercise on mineral processing. Contents. Problems 1 to 7

ThermoStar Refrigeration Air Dryers

A car air-conditioning system based on an absorption refrigeration cycle using energy from exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine

Some Criteria for Choosing a Steam Boiler for a Microbrewery

Natural gas liquids recovery from gas turbine fuel

Thermal processing for drying, heating and cooling

High Precision Measurement of the Target Mass of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detectors

FORMATION DAMAGE AND WELL TREATMENT SYSTEM

How Ground/Water Source Heat Pumps Work

Thermal Coupling Of Cooling and Heating Systems

NGL RECOVERY PLANT: TREATER OPTIMIZATION FOR WATER AND MERCAPTAN REMOVAL

Comparison of Spherical and Membrane Large LNG. Carriers in Terms of Cargo Handling

Hydrogen from Natural Gas via Steam Methane Reforming (SMR)

Advanced Mercury Removal Technologies UOP LLC. All rights reserved. UOP 5241G-01

Description of Thermal Oxidizers

Air Eliminators and Combination Air Eliminators Strainers

Waste Heat Recovery through Air Conditioning System

Heterogeneous Catalysis and Catalytic Processes Prof. K. K. Pant Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

LIPE- Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Toulouse, France Contact:

Retention Parameters in Column Chromatography

Vacuum and Compressor Systems for the Chemical Process Industry

4.1 Dry Cleaning General 1,2

ThermoSorb Desiccant Dryers

Chemical Process Simulation

Modern Sand Reclamation Technologies for Economy, Environment Friendliness and Energy Efficiency

NEURAL IDENTIFICATION OF SUPERCRITICAL EXTRACTION PROCESS WITH FEW EXPERIMENTAL DATA

Heating Water by Direct Steam Injection

Saving Boiler Fuel. Figure 1: Boiler System Operation Costs

WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OPERATING MANUALS )

Rainwater Harvesting

FXA Candidates should be able to : Define and apply the concept of specific heat capacity. Select and apply the equation : E = mcδθ

AMMONIA AND UREA PRODUCTION

A New Technique Provides Faster Particle Size Analysis at a Lower Cost Compared to Conventional Methods

C. starting positive displacement pumps with the discharge valve closed.

QUESTIONS THERMODYNAMICS PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR NON-TECHNICAL MAJORS. Thermodynamic Properties

15 April 2015 Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan. 1. Overview

Morphysorb /Genosorb Physical solvents for acid gas removal

Factsheet & Process Description Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) Vopak Terminal Amsterdam Westpoort

Commercial refrigeration has been in the environmental. Refrigerant. as a. Basics Considerations PART 1:

Nitrogen Blanketing for Methanol Storage and Transportation

No. Name Description Main input Data Main Output Data. cooling duty, process in/out temperature, inlet air temperature

ME6130 An introduction to CFD 1-1

UNIT 2 REFRIGERATION CYCLE

dryon Processing Technology Drying / cooling in outstanding quality we process the future

M2M-TECHNOLOGY: THE NEW STANDARD TO MINIMIZE BAUXITE RESIDUE

Torino Nord. Cogeneration Plant. The gas turbine. The steam generator. The Torino Nord cogeneration plant produces electricity and heat for district

Ion Exchange Design Hand calculation. Brian Windsor (Purolite International Ltd)

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY 3, CE 427 DRYING OF SOLIDS

The Problem. Enhanced Oil Recovery Research. Research Details. For immediate release: June, 2015

Unsteady State Relief Valve Evaluation. External Pool Fire Scenario

Bioremediation. Introduction

HYDRYER TYPE P Heat Regenerative Dryers ISO 9001 CERTIFIED

Transcription:

Decaffeination of Raw, Green offee Beans Using Supercritical O 2 Background The worldwide coffee market and the industry that supplies it are among the world s largest. offee as a world commodity is second only to oil. offee decaffeination is an area in which there has been a notable commercialization of supercritical O 2 extraction technology. In the past, a methylene chloride extraction process had been used. Methylene chloride is used to extract the caffeine from the coffee beans by continuously circulating the solvent. Typical extraction times range from 24 to 36 hours. Then the solvent must be stripped from the beans by another process that takes from one to eight hours. The major disadvantage of the methylene chloride process is that it is toxic, and a residue is often left on the beans. Extraction processes that use supercritical O 2 leave no such residue. Also, supercritical O 2 is selective exclusively for the caffeine. It does not extract any of the flavor material in the coffee, unlike methylene chloride. Also there is no associated waste treatment of a toxic solvent, and extraction times are generally lower. Environmental Significance use of environmentally-friendly solvent no toxic residues no associated waste treatment of a toxic solvent Process Description The PFD is attached. A cycle begins with the extractor, T-201, being charged with water moistened coffee beans. The extraction is then started by contacting the beans with supercritical O 2 from the holding tank, TK-202. The O 2 is passed through the bed of beans for approximately ten

hours. After ten hours, 97% of the caffeine has been extracted from the beans. The caffeine-laden O 2 leaves the extractor and accumulates in the holding tank, TK-201A, until the extraction is finished. Once the extraction is completed, the extractor begins a two-hour down time while it is emptied and charged with fresh beans. Next, the caffeine rich O 2 in TK-201A begins flowing at a steady rate through the water wash column, T-202. Here the supercritical O 2 is contacted with a stream of water, which removes 99.5% of the caffeine from the O 2. The regenerated supercritical O 2 leaves the water wash in Stream 9. At this point in the process, the O 2 is at a lower pressure due to pressure drops through the system. Pump P-202A/B makes up for this pressure loss. Next, the regenerated O 2 begins accumulating in holding tank TK-202. It does so until the two hours of required down time are finished at which point it is fed back to the extractor to begin decaffeinating a new batch of coffee. On this cycle, the supercritical O 2 exiting the extractor accumulates in TK-201B since TK-201A is still discharging O 2 from the previous batch. By alternating between tanks TK-201 A and B, caffeine-rich supercritical O 2 can feed the water wash column at a steady state. The conditions in the water wash column are the same as those of the extractor to keep the O 2 in its supercritical state. The caffeine-rich water exiting the water wash is throttled to approximately atmospheric pressure. A small amount of previously dissolved O 2 is vented from the process vessel V-201 as a gas. Next, process water is added to the caffeine-rich water in process vessel V-202. This makes up for the water lost when the caffeine is concentrated to a 15- wt% solution in the reverse osmosis unit, RO-201. This retentate stream, Stream 7, is then sent to a drying section to obtain solid caffeine. The permeate of the reverse osmosis unit is essentially caffeine free. It is then pumped and sent back to the water wash in Stream 8.

Necessary Information and Simulation Hints O 2 becomes a supercritical fluid (SF) when heated above its critical temperature and compressed or pumped above its critical pressure, which are approximately 31 and 74 bar, respectively. Most SF extractions require temperatures and pressures well above the critical temperature and pressure to obtain reasonable recoveries of the extract. For the process described here, a production rate of 10.8 million kg per year of decaffeinated coffee beans was desired. The ten-hour extraction time was determined by using a mathematical model for supercritical O 2 to extract 97% of the caffeine from the coffee beans. The extraction model should account for both the variation of the concentration of caffeine in the O 2 with time as well as position in the reactor. The model is simplified by modeling the reactor as three well-mixed tanks in series. This is done by dividing the extractor into three well-mixed slices with the outlet concentration of each being a function of the outlet concentration of the previous slice. The model incorporates experimental mass transfer coefficients and partition coefficients for varying temperatures and pressures. The following equations were given as a mathematical model of the extraction of caffeine from raw, green coffee beans in a differential sized extractor 1. dx dθ + x α = φ ( x my) ( 1 α) α (1) dy d φ ( x my) [ β + ( β) K ] = θ 1 (2) where

x = = caffeine concentration in bed voids y = = = caffeine concentration in pores of coffee bean t θ = τ t = time total caffeine τ = space time φ = K K o i p o i o p τ = combined mass transfer coefficien t m = partition coefficient of caffeine between O α = void fraction in bed β = porosity of wet bean concentration in coffee bean and water K = equilibriu m adsorption coefficient between caffeine bound in bean solid and caffeine in bean pores (assumed to be1) Equation (1) is the material balance on caffeine in the bed, and Equation (2) is the material balance on caffeine in the bean. References 1. Peker, Hulya, M. P. Srinvasan, J. M. Smith, and Ben J. Mcoy. affeine Extraction Rates from offee Beans with Supercritical arbon Dioxide, AIhE Journal. Vol 38, No. 5, pp. 761-769, May 1992. Equipment Descriptions T-201 Extraction Vessel 2 TK-201 A/B affeine Extract Storage Tanks T-202 Water Wash olumn V-201 Degasser V-202 Absorber Feed Tank

RO-201 Reverse Osmosis Unit P-201 A/B Wash Water Recycle Pump P-202 A/B O 2 Recycle Pump TK-202 O 2 Storage Tank offee Decaffeination Stream Table Stream No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Temperature ( ) -- 50 50 50 50 50 Pressure (bar) -- 103 103 1 1 1 Phase solid liquid SF ** liquid vapor liquid Total Flow (kg/h) 16130 * 88.7 1089 1710 84.4 1714 omponent Flowrates (kg/h) arbon Dioxide -- -- 1073 84.4 84.4 -- affeine 161.3 -- 15.7 15.7 -- 15.7 offee 16130 * -- -- -- -- 1699 Water -- 88.7 -- 1610 -- -- Stream No. 7 8 9 10 11 Temperature ( ) 50 50 50 50 50 Pressure (bar) 1 103 98 103 103 Phase liquid liquid SF ** SF ** SF ** Total Flow (kg/h) 104.4 1610 989 1073 84.4 omponent Flowrates (kg/h) arbon Dioxide -- 989 1073 84.4 affeine 15.7 -- -- -- -- offee -- -- -- -- -- Water 88.7 1610 -- -- -- * The flow of coffee is actually a batch charge at the beginning of each extraction under ambient conditions. ** supercritical fluid