Progress (and Challenges) along the Path to 2025 Ron Reese, II Manager, Advanced Combustion Systems FCA US LLC ERC 2015 Symposium University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Global Powertrain Kokomo (Mfg x 4) Kokomo Cast (Mfg) Auburn Hills (R&D) Chelsea (R&D) Trenton (Mfg x 2) Mack (Mfg) Dundee (Mfg) Toledo (Mfg) Conner (Mfg) Bielsko Biala (Mfg) Manufacturing Engineering Yucca (R&D) Satillo (Mfg x 2) Santa Fe (R&D) Cordoba (Mfg) Etobicoke Cast (Mfg) Pomigliano (R&D) Pratola Serra (Mfg) Termoli (Mfg) Pernambuco (R&D, Mfg) Betim (R&D, Mfg x 2) Ranjangaon (R&D, Mfg) Pune (R&D) Chennai (R&D) Jiading (R&D) Orbassano (R&D) Mirafiori (R&D) Verrone (Mfg) Balocco (R&D) Shanghai (R&D) Campo Largo (Mfg) Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) Multi-national company, formed in 2014 Two main subsidiaries: FCA Italy and FCA US World s seventh-largest auto maker 2
Light Duty Vehicle Brands: Mass-Market 3
Light Duty Vehicle Brands: Luxury 4
Light Duty Mass-Market: Gasoline Engines NAFTA High Volume Engine Families Today FIRE I4 Tigershark I4 Pentastar V6 HEMI V8 5
Light Duty Mass-Market: Gasoline Engines NAFTA Engine Offerings Today Pentastar HEMI FIRE Tigershark 6
Light Duty Mass-Market: Gasoline Engines NAFTA Engine Offerings Example, looking to the Past The Pentastar family replaced seven V-6 Engines (four families) and provided significant CO2 reduction with improvements in performance and refinement X 2.7L More than 3 Million Pentastar Engines produced since 2010CY X 3.0L X 3.5L X 3.7L X X 3.3L 4.0L X 3.8L Three-time Ward s 10 Best Engines winner The Pentastar engine family provided improvements in power and a 7% improvement in fuel efficiency across the fleet 7
Light Duty Mass-Market: Gasoline Engines Global Engine Offerings Example, looking to the Future 8
97% Reduction compared to 1994 LEV I 90% Reduction > 2x Increase in FE Regulatory Challenges NAFTA (that we all know too well) 0.910 SULEV30 9
THE Industry Challenge At the center is cost effective CO2 reduction Simultaneously balancing all requirements, INCLUDING Finding solutions the customer will want to buy Customer Fuel Economy Cost of Ownership Performance Drivability Utility Cost Effective CO 2 Reduction Corporate Profitability Sustainability Image Regulatory CO 2 / CAFE Criteria Pollutants OBD 10
Where to start Get the most out of existing engines: Follow the path of engine Ideal Operation How to do it? CVT Hybrid Planetary stepped transmission with more gears and wider ratio range 11
8 and 9 Speed Transmissions FCA US Strategy to achieve engine ideal operation and more FCA US focused on transmissions first moving from 4, 5, and 6 speeds to 8 and 9 speeds gaining efficiency, performance, and refinement 1st in segment with 9-speed FWD transmission 1st domestic automaker to offer 8-speed RWD transmissions in Luxury Sedan, SUV, and Truck 6-10% improvement in fuel economy over their 4, 5, and 6 speed predecessors 12
What s next More Efficient Engines Engine efficiency metrics, as a way to identify opportunities for improvement η engine = η combustion η thermodynamic η gas exchange η mechanical DASI DMP Competitive Scatterband (all plots) Results shown are from a DOE sponsored project. Award #: DE-EE0003347 Awardee: FCA Title: A MultiAir /MultiFuel (MAMF) Approach to Enhancing Engine System Efficiency 13
Combustion Efficiency Production Example: Integrated Exhaust Manifolds Component temperature protection due to material durability limits, is often satisfied via running λ < 1 (rich) Integrated exhaust manifolds allow the excess heat to be removed via the cooling system, extending the λ = 1 operation range Pentastar V6 14
Brake Thermal Efficiency (%) Thermodynamic Efficiency Development Example: 3-Spark Plugs per Cylinder and Cooled EGR MAMF DoE funded project, in collaboration with ANL Two combustion approaches with one design Both are full-range λ = 1 concepts Both were measured on multi-cylinder engines with real boosting systems SI = 41% BTE (Octane on Demand) PFI E85 Injector SI/CI = 45% BTE (Mixed-Mode) 50 45 E85/FT Diesel 40 Gasoline Injector Gasoline Injector 35 30 Gasoline Gasoline/ E85 Blend 3 rd Spark Plug Diesel Injector 25 20 15 12.0:1 CR - Gasoline / E85 13.2:1 CR - E85 with Fischer Tropsch Diesel 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 BMEP (bar) 15
Engine Load Gas Exchange Efficiency, Gas Ex [%] Gas Exchange Efficiency Production Example: Variable Valvetrain (MultiAir and Cylinder Deactivation) MultiAir increases gas exchange efficiency with variable lift and duration Capable of cylinder-by-cylinder and cycle-by-cycle control 105 1800 RPM 100 95 90 85 80 Engine Speed 75 Competitive 70 Scatterband 2.4L w/ MultiAir 65 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 BMEP [bar] HEMI with Fuel Saver Technology (formerly known as Multi-Displacement System ) Collapsing lifters disable valvetrain in 4 cylinders of V8 engine Firing cylinders increase IMEP, requiring intake manifold pressure to increase, reducing pumping work 2000 rpm/2 bar BMEP BSFC: 340 g/kw-hr 280 g/kw-hr (18% improvement) 16
Fluid Temperature (degrees C) Mechanical Efficiency Production Example: Thermal Management and Variable Displacement Oil Pump Thermal Management System (TMS) effectively distributes engine heat via coolant to the Transmission and Engine oil to maximize drivetrain efficiency by reducing viscosity 120 100 FTP City cycle Engine Coolant 80 60 40 20 0 Transmission Oil Engine Coolant w/tms Impact Engine of adding Coolant TMS w/o on TMS FTP City Transmission and Highway Oil Cycles w/tms Transmission Oil w/o TMS 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Time (seconds) Active Grille Shutters Dual-mode variable displacement oil pump Low pressure mode at low engine speeds, where oil pressure demand is low High pressure mode at high engine speeds, where oil pressure demand is high 17
Non-Gasoline Solutions (1 of 3) Production Example: Diesel The 3.0L EcoDiesel engine offers the Best-in-Class highway label fuel economy in Ram 1500 HFE (29 mpg) and Jeep Grand Cherokee (30 mpg) 50 state Tier 2 Bin 5 (NMOG + NO x = 0.075 + 0.05 = 0.125 g/mi) compliance 2000 bar fuel system, with solenoid injectors capable of 8 pulse per cycle injection Cooled EGR FCA have considerable diesel experience Invented common rail for light duty ~50% of FCA European fleet is diesel High Pressure Fuel System (2000 bar) Cooled EGR 18
Non-Gasoline Solutions (2 of 3) Production Example: CNG Ram 2500 is the only factory built bi-fuel truck in the US market Range / Fuel Tanks 370 miles / 18.2 GGE CNG + 8 gallons Gasoline 745 miles / 18.2 GGE CNG + 35 gallons Gasoline CNG is a clean burning fuel and is an enabler for higher efficiency engines In Europe, FCA accounts for ~80% of the CNG market Though Ram 2500 is not a light duty vehicle, the technology can easily be implemented in light duty if / when there is market demand CNG Tanks (18.2 GGE Total) Bi-Fuel 5.7L HEMI V8 CNG-Specific Gauge Cluster CNG and Gasoline Fill (Inside Fuel Door) 19
Non-Gasoline Solutions (3 of 3) Production Example: Nuclear, Wind, Solar, NG, Coal (aka??? BEV) Fiat 500e Zero g/mi CO2 for GHG compliance 108 MPGe highway label EPA combined range of 87 miles PHEV minivan planned 20
Downsizing and Boosting Everything is relative (Hellcat) Following industry trends for new SRT product: HEMI engine displacement reduced: 392 ci 376 ci Boosting system added: Lysholm screw compressor with water-to-air charge air cooler The Result: and we can t build enough 21
Downsizing and Boosting A more conventional example A new gasoline engine family which will incorporate numerous technologies Integrated Water/Air Charge Cooler MultiAir Valvetrain Direct Fuel Injection Twin-Scroll Turbocharger Integrated Exhaust Manifold Low- Friction Silent Chain Aluminum Block Low-Friction Roller Bearing Camshaft Close- Coupled Catalyst Crankshaft Offset from Cylinder Bores Belt Starter / Generator Cooled EGR Variable Displacement Oil Pump Lightweight Crankshaft Low-Friction Roller Bearing Balance Shaft Variable Flow Water Pump + Electric Auxiliary Water Pump Stop/Start Starter 22
Fuel Economy Standards Z-Curves Light duty standards are described by Z- Curves Different for cars and trucks Footprint-based Drives increased fuel efficiency for all vehicles X Y Footprint = X * Y 23
System-Level Efficiency Analysis Propulsion System Efficiency (PSE) Similar to ton-mile/gallon, but better for light duty Accounts for aero, tire, and brake/hub/driveline losses Easily calculable from EPA data PSE = Vehicle Demand Energy Fuel Energy Used = η engine x η trans x η driveline Source: www.epa.gov/otaq/tcldata.htm 24
System-Level Efficiency Analysis Propulsion System Efficiency (PSE) Examples of new product improvement PSE = Vehicle Demand Energy Fuel Energy Used = η engine x η trans x η driveline D AWD Crossover 4x2 V6 Truck OLD NEW Source: www.epa.gov/otaq/tcldata.htm 25
Examples of Challenges that Remain Propulsion System Efficiency (PSE) At current VDE (and footprint), ~35% PSE is required to meet 2025 Or, at current PSE (and footprint), an 18%-34% reduction in VDE is needed PSE = Vehicle Demand Energy Fuel Energy Used = η engine x η trans x η driveline D AWD Crossover 4x2 V6 Truck 4x4 Diesel Truck 2015 2021 2025 2015 2021 2025 2021 (met) 2015 2025 Source: www.epa.gov/otaq/tcldata.htm 26
PSE, % How to Achieve 35% PSE? Load Factor Smaller engines (higher Load Factor) and diesels help, but are not enough Full hybrids may be enough, but are not likely to span the entire fleet 40% 35% Propulsion System Efficiency Analysis for 15MY EPA New Cert. Vehicles Grand Cherokee 6.4L NA, 3.6L NA, 3.0L TD Competitor s Hybrid Vehicle 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% Challenger 6.2L SC, 6.4L NA Ferrari 6.3L NA (731 hp) Viper 8.4L NA (645 hp) Cherokee 3.2L NA Dart 1.4L T Examples 5% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% Load Factor, % (Average Cycle Power / Rated Engine Power) 500 1.4L NA Gasoline Diesel Hybrid 27
Hybrid Market Penetration and Forecast Fleet is projected to be 89% Non xev in 2021 With Gas Prices Less of a Worry, Buyers Pass Hybrid Cars By In all, 55 percent of hybrid and electric vehicle owners are defecting to a gasoline-only model at trade-in time the lowest level of hybrid loyalty since Edmunds.com began tracking such transactions in 2011. More than one in five are switching to a conventional sport utility vehicle, nearly double the rate of three years ago. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/15/automobiles/wheels/with-gas-pricesless-of-a-worry-buyers-pass-hybrids-cars-by.html?_r=0 Hybrid and Electric Vehicles Struggle to Maintain Owner Loyalty Overall, only 45 percent of this year's hybrid and EV trade-ins have gone toward the purchase of another alternative fuel vehicle, down from just over 60 percent in 2012. Never before have loyalty rates for alt-fuel vehicles fallen below 50 percent. http://www.edmunds.com/about/press/hybrid-and-electric-vehicles-struggleto-maintain-owner-loyalty-reports-edmundscom.html Source: IHS MarketInsight 3-2015; IHS US Sales Based Fcst 3-2015; LMC US HEV Fcst Q1 2015; Additional Data Sources; FCA not included in this analysis 28
Other Technical Challenges / Lessons Learned A few examples based on MAMF experience High efficiency can present aftertreatment temperature challenges Robust combustion control is required, if steady state results are to be realized in vehicle Degree of down speeding is limited by transient torque response (e.g. turbo lag) and driveline torsional vibration Accurate, predictive models that can operate on an engineering time scale are a necessity, especially as combustion systems become more complex 29
In Summary A great deal of work remains, to satisfy regulatory AND customer requirements for 2025 There is no one single solution that will satisfy all requirements It will be a collection of many Consumer acceptance is key The current price of fuel further limits the consumer s willingness to pay for fuelefficient technology The industry as a whole is hopeful the mid-term review will provide a balanced view of what is required for 2025 30
Thank you. FCA US Technology Center in Auburn Hills, Michigan 31