Syngas from Biomass Problems and Solutions en route to technical Realisation International Conference Synthesis Gas Chemistry Dresden, 4.-6. October 2006
Motivation Biomass is the only renewable carbon source! Biomass should be used favourably for organic chemicals and fuel production instead of electrical power and heat generation! Syngas and its main constituent, Hydrogen, are key intermediates for synthetic chemistry! Synthetic fuels are most promising products!
Main uses of syngas and hydrogen Thermochemical via intermediates Biological direct and via intermediates Hydrogen Ammonia Hydrocarbons Waxes CO + H 2 Methanol Aldehydes Alcohols
Fuel options of syngas and hydrogen Hydrogen Fuel Cells MTBE Gasoline Diesel CO + H 2 Methanol DME Gasoline CH 4 (SNG) Medium BTU gas I. Wender, Fuel Proc. Techn. 48 (1996) 189
Thermochemical gas formation from biomass Dry Biomass CO, H 2 Fischer- Tropsch Methanol DME... C 6 H 12 O 6 6 CO + 6 H 2 6 CO + 6 H 2 O 6 CO 2 + 6 H 2 Wet Biomass H 2, CH 4 Fuell cells Gas engines... C 6 H 12 O 6 + 6 H 2 O 6 CO 2 + 12 H 2
Gasification of dry biomass Dry Biomass CO, H 2 C 6 H 12 O 6 6 CO + 6 H 2 6 CO + 6 H 2 O 6 CO 2 + 6 H 2
Hurdles in biomass utilization Usually low volumetric energy density Widely distributed occurrence Heterogeneous solid fuels High ash and salt contents Direct gasification is problematic (tar and methane formation) Unfavourable H 2 :CO ratio after gasification Downstream syntheses require high pressures (Fischer-Tropsch 30 bar, Methanol, DME 80 bar) Use of catalysts sensitive to impurities
The slurry gasification concept Energy density [GJ/m 3 ] Distributed biomass Transport radius Straw 1,5 25 km Slurry 20 Regional intermediate fuel production regionale Pyrolyse- Anlagen Diesel 36 Zentraler Central syngas and fuel production 250 km
Straw Fast pyrolysis Slurry Stroh preparation De-central central High pressure entrained flow gasification Gas conditioning The process chain basing on a review an technologies suitable to be adapted to biomass feedstocks Fuel synthesis Synfuel
Fast pyrolysis using a twin screw mixer reactor Stroh, Straw, Heu wood, u.a.... Chopper Häcksler M Cold chopped straw kaltes Strohhäcksel heisser Sand ca. 500 C Hot sand 550 C Heater, Heizer Heat Sandkreislauf carrier loop Pyrolysis segas Kühler Cooler Pyrolysis Pyrolyseöl oil Slurry Pyrolysekoks Pyrolysis char M Doppelschnecken-Reaktor Twin screw mixer reactor
Reactor principle Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gases, vapors and pulverised Sand hotsand Straw-cut ratio 5-15 Sand loop Char Mechanically fluidised sand at 500 C (no dilution by gas), fast transport with good radial mixing (2 s gas retention time) fast heat transfer, ball milling effect
Mass distribution Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Straw retention in the mixing reactor 0,25 0,2 5 90 kg Sand pro h plus 3 g Stohhäcksel 0,15 4 0,1 3 2 1 Hertz 0,05 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 t (s)
Variation of heat transfer carriers Optimisation of the heat transfer medium for: - spherical particles reduced abrasion of the medium - higher heat capacity low heat carrier / biomass ratio - coarse-grained particles better milling of the char and its separation from the heat carrier medium Steel SiC SiO 2 c p,wt (at 600 C) [kj/(kg K)] 0,6 1,2 1,25 (T aus -T ein ) WT [K] 50 100 50 100 50 100 m WT /m Bio (wet) [ - ] 50 25 25 12,5 24 12 m WT /m Bio (dry) [ - ] 43 22 22 11 21 10
Representative results 1000 Produktausbeute g/kg 800 600 400 200 Gas Schwelteer Schwelwasser Koks 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wood Material Nr. Straw Focus on more difficult biomass like straw less condensates, more ash (solids) Lab scale plant (10 kg/h)
Slurry preparation Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Highly porous char from straw, soaked with 78 wt.% tar Is liquefied by milling and heating char particle volume fraction ~ 50 % porosity 50-80 %
Influence of milling on slurry preparation Suitable for entrained flow gasification Original char particles suspended in alcohol Mass distribution Slurry 1: 21 wt.% weat straw char Slurry 4: 40 wt.% weat straw char Char particles after colloidal milling Particle size / μm Better milling with increasing viscosity and particle content
Viscosity of slurrys with high particle load near the sedimentation limit: a few Pas good atomization below 0.3 Pas 4 60 50 40 30 20 Temperature[ temperature -- -- o C -- ] Pre-condition: Enough liquid phase to cover all particles with a liquid film Short storage: rearrangement of the organic molecules after mixing: increase of viscosity. Long time storage: char particles improve their arrangement, less liquid is contained in the space between the particles, decrease of viscosity. logarithm Viscosity of viscosity ln (η) [ ln ( η ) ] 3 2 1 0-1 -1-2 -2-3 -3 23 % char 30 30 %% char 26 26 %% Koks char 33 % char 10 1,0 0,1 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Viscosity viscosity [ Pas ] Reciprocal reciprocal temperature [ 1000/Kelvin ]
Continuous slurry preparation Supply of pyrolysis oil (8 t) and char (4 t) at Future Energy Continuously operated slurry mixer (1 t/h) at FZK
High pressure entrained flow (GSP) gasifier Tar free synthesis gas Suitable for feeds rich of ash Gasification with pure O 2 High pressures, 30 to 100 bar Temperatures around 1200 C pilot fuel steel pressure shell flame oxygen Residence time of seconds, complete C-conversion 4 gasification campaigns with different feed materials, process parameters, 500 kg/h (2-3 MW th ) water cooled radiation screen ~ 1200 C ~ 50 bar raw syngas molten slag
Results of slurry-gasification Gas composition H 2 CO CO 2 N 2 Feeds: Solids: 0 39 wt.% Ash: 3 % Heating value: 10 25 MJ/kg Density: 1250 kg/m 3 Operation conditions: Throughput: 0.35 0.5 t/h Pressure: 26 bar Temperature: 1200 1600 C Feed-Temperature: 40, 80 C no tar, < 0.1 vol.% methane C-conversion 99 % operation without problems Equilibrium: (CO 2 H 2 ) / (CO H 2 O) = K(T) Slag melting point < 1200 C
Influence of the water content No tar, < 0,05 Vol.% Methane, 0.5 t/h 1200 1300 C, 24 MPa, 25 33 % char H 2 0 % Conversion % HHV kj/kg η 62-1/2 5.8 95 24500 70 Versuch Nr. 78-1 H 2 CO CO 2 N 2 27.8 92 16860 57 79-1 50.6 90,5 13590 44 0 20 40 60 80 100 Gas yield / vol.% Gasausbeute / Vol.% * Gasifcation campaigns 2003 and 2005
Lignocellulose 100 % Energy- and mass balance ~ 7 % ~ 1 % Schnellpyrolyse Fast pyrolysis ~ 3 % Kondensat/Koks Condensate/char Slurry ~ 90 % Flugstrom Entrained - Druckvergasung flow gasification ~ 3 % Synthese Synthesis-raw -Rohgas Reaktionswärme Heat of reaction Synthese Synthesis-clean -Reingas ~ 76 % ~ 13 % 7.5 t Wood or Straw with 15 wt.% H 2 O 5.4 t Condensate/char - slurry plus ~ 1,8 t O 2 Heat losses: Sum ~ 6 % ~ 1 % ~ 1 % FT- Synthesis Synthese FTS - Heat Reaktionswärme of reaction ~ 18 % Syntheseprodukte Synthesis products ~ 51 % nicht Not umgesetztes converted Syngas ~ 6 % Trennung Separation C 5- - Produkte Products ~ 5 % El. Power and HT steam: ~ 42 % ~ 40 % C 5+ FTS - Produkte Synfuel, waxes, olefines...... ~ 5 % valuable C 5 -products C 5 1.2 t FTS-raw products 1 t Synthetic fuel By-products: Chemicals, Steam, Electricity
State of development Fundamental studies in lab scale equipment, parameter determination for various feed materials and conditions, selection of appropriate process technologies Demonstration of the principal technical feasibility in technical relevant plants, process variants in bench scale plants Construction and operation of a pilot plant proving practicability, allowing for scale-up and reliable cost estimates
Pilot plant (500 kg/h) Stepwise construction : 1. Biomass conditioning Fast pyrolysis, slurry preparation 2006 2. Gasifier 2007 3. Gas conditioning Fuel synthesis 2008
State of construction Pyrolysis plant Conditioning Slurry mixing
Gasification of wet biomass Wet Biomass H 2, CH 4 C 6 H 12 O 6 + 6 H 2 O 6 CO 2 + 12 H 2
Hydrothermal gasification of biomass is an option to generate hydrogen directly from wet biomass and organic residues using a renewable resource could fill the lack in hydrogen as present in the dry biomass conversion process, because for methanol production a CO/H 2 of 2 is required is favourable, when zero cost residual biomass or waste are used
Hydrogen for synfuel production Syngas composition after gasification 2 CO + H 2 H 2 -deficit Hydrogen from single gasification process: CO + H 2 O H 2 + CO 2 Shift-reaction CO + 2 H 2 H 2 O + -CH 2 - Synthesis 2 CO + H 2 CO 2 + -CH 2-1t product -CH 2 - from 4.2 t product gas bad carbon efficiency External hydrogen, e.g. by hydrothermal gasification of e.g. bio-ethanol C 2 H 5 OH + 3 H 2 O 6 H 2 + 2 CO 2 C 2 H 5 OH + H 2 O CH 4 + CO 2 + 2 H 2 (H 2 :CH 4 = 4:1) 1 t Hydrogen from 7.5 t ethanol C 2 H 5 OH + 2 (2 CO +H 2 ) 2 CO 2 + H 2 O + 4-CH 2-1 t Product from 2.1 t product gas and 3.2 ethanol higher carbon yield in the fuel no need for CO 2 -separation
Hydrothermal gasification of biomass C 6 H 12 O 6 6 CO + 6 H 2 6 CO + 6 H 2 O 6 CO 2 + 6 H 2 C 6 H 12 O 6 + 6 H 2 O 6 CO 2 + 12 H 2 No drying prior to the process Classical gasification Water-gas-shift-reaction Hydrothermal gasification Δ r H o = 158 kj/mol (Glucose) High H 2 -yield obtained under pressure, nearly no CO integrated water gas shift reaction, catalysts included Short reaction times, high space/time-yields No tar and char under optimal conditions due to solvation of the reaction intermediates, solvent like environment Easy CO 2 -separation under pressure Inorganic components are not volatile
What thermodynamics predict? 50 40 30 20 10 0 CH 4 H 2 CO 2 CO 300 400 500 600 T / C Wood, CH 1,44 O 0,66, 25 MPa, 10 wt.%
R&D demand Process technology High pressure feeding and pre-treatment Handling of solids precipitations Adaptation to different feed stocks and products Experience with real feed stocks by operation of the pilot plant VERENA and special test facilities Process fundamentals for reaction engineering and optimization Optimisation of H 2 -yield Optimisation of H 2 / CH 4 ratio Avoidance and reduction of tar formation by identification of main reaction pathways and their dependencies via key components
Feeding 100 kg / h 5-20 % dmc Reactor 35 L Volume 0,11 m i.d., 3,7 m length Inconel Ni-Alloy External Heating
Test facility VERENA Biomass Water Gas tank Pre-heater Reaktor Separator Feed Economizer CO 2 - Scrubber HP-Pump Cooler Colloidal mill Res. Water tank Feed section Reaction section Separation section
Hydrothermal gasification of maize silage Results before and after CO 2 -separation CO 1% CO2 44% C2H6 8% CO 2% C2H6 5% CH4 39% H2 51% 7.5 wt.% DS, 700 C, 250 bar, 1.3 3.4 min, Avarage from 7 independent test runs CH4 22% H2 28%
Hydrothermal gasification of maize silage Before CO 2 separation C2H6 5% CO2 44% After CO 2 separation CO 1% H2 51% CH4 39% C2H6 8% CO 2% 5 wt.% DS 0 C, 250 bar 3 3.4 min CH4 22% H2 28%
Lab scale plants exhibiting different reactor characteristics, model compounds and biomass Tumbling reactor (Batch) 500 C, 50 MPa, 1 L Tubular reactor 600 C, 30 MPa, ca. 20 ml Cont. Stirred tank reactor 600 C, 100 MPa, 190 ml
Gas yield and gas composition - Glucose vs. biomass Gas yield / (mol/kg) 35 30 25 20 Phytomass Glucose / K 2 CO 3 45% 47% CH 4 CO 2 1 2 3 4 5 6Ca. 5% DM, 500 C, 30 MPa; τ / min 0.5 % (g/g) K 2 CO 3 H 2 40% H 2 0% 38% CO 2 CH 4 0.17% 15% CO 15%
Influence of alkali salts Vol.- % 80 60 40 20 0 dd CH4 CO2 H2 CO Gas com ponent Mit with KHCO3 Ohne without Conzentration / (mg/l) 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 HOH 2 C O CHO O CHO O CHO H 3 C Mit with KHCO3 ohne without KHCO3 25 MPa, 400 C 1,5 % (g/g) Glucose; 0,2 % (g/g) KHCO 3 OH CH 2 OH OH O OH OH 0 HMF FU MF Furfurals
Concluding remarks Both, dry and wet biomass can be utilized for syngas and hydrogen production by technical feasible and economical ways
Energy balance Energy demand El. Energy 2 kw e Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe 41 kw th Product gas 85 kw th : H 2 90 % CH 4 6 % CO 4 % (after CO 2 -separation) 44 kw th Energyproduction Feed: 15 % MeOH 95 kg/h (79 kw th ) Losses ( 26 kw) 3-6 kw e El. power for CO 2 scrubbing Warm water (T max 166 C, 40 C reflux ) 11 kw th 15 wt.% methanol, 95 kg/h, reaction temperature = 571 C, yield 98.4 %, mass balance 98 %
Energy consumption vs. production 120 100 LHV/time (gas) LHV / time (CH3OH) product Energy / time (kw) 80 60 40 Heat dissipation (flue gas) educt consumption 20 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 c(ch3oh) / wt %
Feed materials for hydrothermal gasification Residual biomass Organic waste Fuels Energy plants Disposal & energy Disposal & energy Decentralized Energy Enduring energy Food & beverage Wine trash Agricultural production Liquid manure Paper & cellulose Pharmaceutical & chemical industry Biotechnology Sewage sludge Bio-alcohol Rape oil MeOH Hydrocarbons Pyrolysis oil Suitable ground and aquatic fresh plants Corn silage Mash (bioethanol) Sludge (biogas) Wet Wet / toxic Without catalyst Use of complete plant
State of development Fundamental studies in lab scale devices (reaction mechanism, kinetics, catalytic effects by salts contained in the biomass), parameter studies (influence of composition, temperature, pressure, concentration, heating rate), investigation of reactor materials Pilot plant operation (100 kg/h) for further process development, e.g. in regard to solids handling (precipitating salts and minerals)and corrosion, optimization in regard to H 2 /CH 4 ratio, operational reliability, and economics
Concluding remarks For syngas production from biomass to large extent, thermochemical processes adapted from fossil fuel treatment are well suited, operational practicability and economics have to be proved Biomass as the only carbon containing renewable energy preferentially should be used for the production of fuels and organic chemicals (consuming ca. 10 % of the primary energy). Heat and electrical power can be produced from other renewable energy sources Since C/H-ratio available from biomass is worse than that from fossil fuels, additional hydrogen should be produced from other renewable resources
Financing R&D budget of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Supplementary support by HGF Ministerium für Ernährung und ländlichen Raum Baden-Württemberg MELR Ministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft BMVEL und FNR EU-Commission Federal Ministry of Education and Research