Groton School Facilities Initiative. Building Construction Scenarios & Site Selection Update



Similar documents
Manchester Board of Education. Proposed Elementary School Facilities Plan April 2, 2014

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

Fayette County Schools Reconfiguration and Realignment

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Park and Recreation Designs

A PPENDICES C OLLIERVILLE 2040 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE

CONFORMITY WITH PLANS; DRAINAGE.

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ORDER OF MAGNITUDE ESTIMATE March 28, 2013

Application for Letter of Eligibility. 3. City/Town: Zip Code: Telephone: Fax: Telephone: Fax:

Village of Royal Palm Beach

Restoration. a brief look at

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

Phases 2 & 3, & Addendum Urban Structure Plan Options for West Whitby

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

MANAGEMENT REPORT. Alternatives to New Secondary North

City of Tampa Zoning Districts

City of El Paso City Plan Commission Staff Report

The Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: May 19, 2015

Corridor Goals and Objectives

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

City of Plano COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EDUCATION ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 8-1

PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT February 23, Summary. Background Information PREPARED FOR THE PLAN COMMISSION. Legistar File ID # 36810

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES

Construction Bond Audit Report. Office of Auditor General

Capacity Planning and Management. School Board Work Session March 16, 2011

Schools. Goals. The City will:

PK-12 Public Educational Facilities Master Plan Evaluation Guide

LAURELHURST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DESIGN DEPARTURE RECOMMENDATIONS

P U B L I C F A C I L I T I E S R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER PLAN 7 Housing

SAN DIEGO CITY SCHOOLS Institute for Learning Instructional Facilities Planning Department

APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE

CITY OF SUN PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM DISCUSSION OF ANDERSON SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT ADDITION, LOS ANGELES CAMPUS

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

Zoning Districts, Gwinnett County, Georgia

NYCIDA PROJECT COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS June 5, 2014

Market Analysis for Padre Boulevard Initiative in the Town of South Padre Island, TX

MASTER FACILITIES PLAN EVALUATION CHECKLIST

SECTION ONE CHAPTER 2: A LAND USE PROFILE OF MANCHESTER

Public Worksessions - A Summary of the New York City Zoning and Planning Study

Planning and Zoning Commission Johnston, Iowa June 29, 2015

Draft Non Transportation Performance Measures Including Related Qualitative Assessment of Example Sections

Difference (Remaining Funds) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

F Rqion d $4 WOhking ff~h

Site Analysis. Floyd Zimmerman, FASLA. Summary CLIENT NEEDS. Supplemental Architectural Services 2000 AIA 1 SITE ANALYSIS SERVICES

MICHIGAN S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

ELEMENT 4 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Greenway Area Study Recommended Master Plan Executive Summary November, 2007 Introduction

PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT

CHAPTER 17: STORM SEWER STANDARDS Introduction Administration Standards 17.1

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

Introduction to Station Area Planning The Charlotte Story

St. Clair College Planning Area Introduction

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: 1 DISCUSSION ITEM

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE STANDARDS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

Older and Historic Schools: Restoration vs. Replacement and the Role of a Feasibility Study

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

Churches and Schools Development Standards

ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES. for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Overview of Land Construction Courses at Kansas State University

Engineering Major Service Actual Budget Projected Request Executive Adopted

City of Colleyville Community Development Department. Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 7255 N. Cedar Avenue Fresno, CA FOR SALE OR LEASE FOR SALE APPROVED SBA FINANCING

FILING REQUIREMENTS EXCERPTS FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS

BAKERY SQUARE 2.0 DEVELOPMENT (FORMER REIZENSTEIN SCHOOL)

Comparison of Infrastructure Costs for Alternatives

Essential Programs & Services State Calculation for Funding Public Education (ED279):

DENSITY AND PUBLIC SPACE AT BISHOP STREET

Priority School Name Minuteman Technical Vocational High School

Alberta Education/ASBOA Bootcamp 101

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services SECOND DWELLING UNIT

BEFORE THE PHOENIX PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF OREGON

Civil Engineering and Architecture (CEA) Detailed Outline

INTRODUCTION COST AND FEASIBILITY OF RENOVATING OR REPLACING AN OLD SCHOOL BUILDING

2006 Bond Program Delivery

TEXT AMENDMENT SUMMARY INFORMATION

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts. Design and Development Guidelines. Part Two.

The Public School Facilities Support Document

Sullivan County Jail: Cost Analysis of Boarding Out vs. Building New

Engineering & Industry Building

Prepared for Massachusetts School Building Authority

Lacy Elementary. School Constructed: Building Age Range

SOLAR ENERGY FACILITIES ZONING AMENDMENTS

DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR UTILITY METERS D.C. HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD

CITY OF GREEN COVE SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2025

Presentation and Discussion of Place Types

Building Permit Application Packet. BUILDING CODES Adopted by La Plata County For Enforcement In The Unincorporated Areas Of La Plata County

Village of Spring Valley Comprehensive Plan

Smart Growth Illustrated: Developer s Guidebook. City of Bentonville Community Development Department October 2006

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY. 1. Applicant's Name

Transcription:

Groton School Facilities Initiative Building Construction Scenarios & Site Selection Update + 1

Introduction Recap of Options from 7/25 Meeting Introduction The S/L/A/M Collaborative Grant Reimbursement Overview Building Construction Scenarios for Consideration Workgroup Discussion Concensus on Alternatives Update on Site Selection + 2

Preferred Options Recap Scenario 1: One Middle School Scenario 2: Renovate Middle Schools & Build Two New Elementary Scenario 3: Two New Middle Schools Build One New Middle School 6-8 (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Renovate to New/Addition to West Side & Cutler MS (6-8 Config) Build TWo New PreK-5 East Side / West Side (Site TBD) Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Build Two New 600 Student 6-8 Middle Schools (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler + 3

SLAM Firm Profile Total Staff of 160 Large firm Small studios Dedicated Education Studio Stability: Staff, Management, Financial Industry Reputation, Client Satisfaction Multidisciplinary Firm Architecture Interior Design Programming & Planning Landscape Architecture Structural Engineering Cost Estimating Services Construction Management In-house Firm Specialties Cost Modeling/ Planning Sustainable Design Building Information Modeling (BIM) Certified Specifications Building Analysis + Code Expertise 4

SLAM Firm Profile Everybody has PE Experience Design Expertise BSF Experience Design Awards Etc. Only SLAM provides: Integrated Approach Team of Experts Building Information Modeling Documentation & more Construction Services Studio Cost Modeling Constructability Pragmatic Approach Programming Leadership Classroom to Career + 5

Reimbursement Overview Groton Reimbursement Rate trending downward since 2012 School New School Construction Construction (20 80%) (10 70%) 2012: 57.50 47.50 2013: 56.79 46.79 2014: 56.07 46.07 + 6

Cost Modeling Assumptions Larger enrollment building area aligns with state space standards Smaller enrollment building areas are slightly higher than state space standards Building areas not based on Ed. Spec. program Estimated state reimbursement based on 2014 reimbursement rates Includes High Performance Design to meet CT HPDS (16a 38k) + 7

Cost Modeling Assumptions Construction Manager at Risk delivery Escalated at 3% for remainder of 2013 and 4% per year from 2014 forward No Project Labor Agreement (PLA) Excludes Hazardous Building Material abatement costs Excludes site acquisition costs Groton proceeds At Risk with A/E design services after successful referendum to achieve proposed schedules + 8

Scenario 1: One Middle School Scenario 1 Overview Build One New Middle School (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Remove Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Successive construction projects Significant escalation costs Possibility of needing to purchase one site Model includes the following site development allowances: $5 M for New Building $1.5 M for Renovate To New Buildings 1,000 Students + 9

Scenario 1 - One New Middle School Scenario 1: One Middle School Build One New Middle School (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Remove Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler 1,000 Students Scenario 1 New 1000 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) Renovate to New - West Side MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (480 Students) Renovate to New - Cutler MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (465 Students) Demolish Bulter ES Demolish Pleasant Valley ES Demolish Chester ES 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 18 Mo. 16 Mo. 16 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. Mid-Year Move + 10

Scenario 1 - One New Middle School Scenario 1: One Middle School Build One New Middle School (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Remove Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Updated: August 23, 2013 1,000 Students Scenario 1 Cost Breakdown Gross Building Area Total Project Cost Net Cost to Groton New 1000 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be 1 determined) 170,000 $ 76,015,152 $ 40,994,971 2 3 Renovate to New - West Side MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (480 Students) 74,200 $ 30,187,495 $ 15,833,819 Renovate to New - Cutler MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (465 Students) 70,071 $ 28,961,972 $ 14,835,247 4 Demolish Bulter ES 37,450 $ 1,296,226 $ 1,296,226 5 Demolish Pleasant Valley ES 40,408 $ 1,342,125 $ 1,342,125 6 Demolish Chester ES 43,581 $ 1,380,097 $ 1,380,097 TOTAL: $ 139,183,069 $ 75,682,486 + 11

Scenario 1A Overview Scenario 1: One Middle School Build One New Middle School (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Remove Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Successive construction projects 1,200 Students Longer construction duration for new school extends overall schedule Significant escalation costs Possibility of needing to purchase one site Includes the same site development allowances as Scenario 1 + 12

Scenario 1A - One New Middle School Scenario 1: One Middle School Build One New Middle School (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Remove Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler 1,200 Students Scenario 1A New 1200 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) Renovate to New - West Side MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (480 Students) Renovate to New - Cutler MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (465 Students) Demolish Bulter ES Demolish Pleasant Valley ES Demolish Chester ES 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 20 Mo. 16 Mo. 16 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. Difficult to move in Spring Wait for Academic year end to start renovations + 13

Scenario 1: One Middle School Scenario 1A - One New Middle School Build One New Middle School (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Remove Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Updated: August 23, 2013 1,200 Students Scenario 1A Cost Breakdown Gross Building Area Total Project Cost Net Cost to Groton New 1200 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be 1 determined) 204,000 $ 89,240,737 $ 48,127,529 2 3 Renovate to New - West Side MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (480 Students) 74,200 $ 32,049,395 $ 16,810,415 Renovate to New - Cutler MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (465 Students) 70,071 $ 30,734,199 $ 15,743,038 4 Demolish Bulter ES 37,450 $ 1,313,862 $ 1,313,862 5 Demolish Pleasant Valley ES 40,408 $ 1,360,520 $ 1,360,520 6 Demolish Chester ES 43,581 $ 1,399,307 $ 1,399,307 TOTAL: $ 156,098,019 $ 84,754,670 + 14

Scenario 2 Overview Scenario 2: Renovate Middle Schools & Build Two New Elementary Renovate to New/Addition to West Side & Cutler MS (6-8 Config) Build TWo New PreK-5 East Side / West Side (Site TBD) Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Concurrent construction projects Reduction in escalation costs, but requires Groton to fund and manage four projects simultaneously Possibility of needing to purchase two sites Model includes the following site development allowances: $3.5 M for New Building $1.5 M for Renovate To New Buildings + 15

Scenario 2 - Two New PreK-5 s Scenario 2: Renovate Middle Schools & Build Two New Elementary Renovate to New/Addition to West Side & Cutler MS (6-8 Config) Build TWo New PreK-5 East Side / West Side (Site TBD) Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Scenario 2 Renovate to New - West Side MS to 6-8 Facility for 500 Students 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 26 Mo. Renovate to New - Cutler MS to 6-8 Facility for 500 Students 26 Mo. New 500 Student PreK-5 Elementary School #1 (Site to be determined) 16 Mo. New 500 Student PreK-5 Elementary School #2 (Site to be determined) 16 Mo. Demolish Bulter ES Demolish Pleasant Valley ES Demolish Chester ES Demolish Portables at Barnum ES Demolish Portables at Morrison ES 6 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. 3 Mo. 3 Mo. + 16

Scenario 2 - Two New PreK-5 s Updated: August 23, 2013 Scenario 2: Renovate to New/Addition to West Side & Cutler Gross MS Building (6-8 Config) Scenario Renovate 2 Middle Cost Breakdown Area Total Project Cost Net Cost to Groton 1 Build TWo New PreK-5 East Side / West Side (Site TBD) Schools Renovate & Build to New - West Side MS to 6-8 Facility for 500 90,000 $ 37,602,424 $ 17,552,553 Students Two New Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Elementary 2 Renovate to New - Cutler MS to 6-8 Facility for 500 Students 90,000 $ 38,045,542 $ 17,759,397 3 New 500 Student PreK-5 Elementary School #1 (Site to be determined) 72,500 $ 34,536,433 $ 20,151,896 4 New 500 Student PreK-5 Elementary School #2 (Site to be determined) 72,500 $ 34,536,433 $ 20,151,896 5 Demolish Bulter ES 37,450 $ 1,253,397 $ 1,253,397 6 Demolish Pleasant Valley ES 40,408 $ 1,297,452 $ 1,297,452 7 Demolish Chester ES 43,581 $ 1,333,446 $ 1,333,446 8 Demolish Portables at Barnum ES 1,800 $ 338,534 $ 338,534 9 Demolish Portables at Morrison ES 1,800 $ 338,534 $ 338,534 + 17 TOTAL: $ 149,282,194 $ 80,177,106

Scenario 3: Two New Middle Schools Scenario 3 Overview Build Two New 600 Student 6-8 Middle Schools (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler Successive construction projects 600 Students Reduction in escalation costs, but requires Groton to fund and manage two projects simultaneously Possibility of needing to purchase two sites Model includes the following site development allowances: $5 M for New Building $1.5 M for Renovate To New Buildings Updated: August 23, 2013 + 18

Scenario 3 - Two New Middle Schools Scenario 3: Two New Middle Schools Build Two New 600 Student 6-8 Middle Schools (Site TBD) Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler 600 Students Scenario 3 New 600 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 18 Mo. New 600 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) Renovate to New - West Side MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (480 Students) Renovate to New - Cutler MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (465 Students) Demolish Bulter ES Demolish Pleasant Valley ES Demolish Chester ES Demolish Portables at Barnum ES Demolish Portables at Morrison ES 18 Mo. 16 Mo. 16 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. 3 Mo. 3 Mo. Mid-Year Move + 19

Scenario 3 - Two New Middle Schools Updated: August 23, 2013 Build Two New 600 Student 6-8 Middle Schools Gross Building (Site TBD) Scenario 33: Cost Two Breakdown Area Total Project Cost Net Cost to Groton 1 Renovate Cutler as New East Side PreK-5 New New 600 Middle Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) 105,000 $ 52,568,433 $ 28,879,642 Schools Renovate West Side as New West Side PreK-5 Close Claude Chester, Pleasant Valley, and S.B. Butler 2 New 600 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) 105,000 $ 52,568,433 $ 28,879,642 600 Students 3 Renovate to New - West Side MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (480 Students) 74,200 $ 30,187,495 $ 15,833,819 4 Renovate to New - Cutler MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (465 Students) 70,071 $ 28,961,972 $ 14,835,247 5 Demolish Bulter ES 37,450 $ 1,296,226 $ 1,296,226 6 Demolish Pleasant Valley ES 40,408 $ 1,342,125 $ 1,342,125 7 Demolish Chester ES 43,581 $ 1,380,097 $ 1,380,097 8 Demolish Portables at Barnum ES 1,800 $ 347,809 $ 347,809 9 Demolish Portables at Morrison ES 1,800 $ 347,809 $ 347,809 + TOTAL: $ 169,000,399 $ 93,142,417 20

Scenario 3A Overview Successive construction projects 500 Students Reduction in escalation costs, but requires Groton to fund and manage two projects simultaneously Possibility of needing to purchase two sites Model includes the following site development allowances: $5 M for New Building $1.5 M for Renovate To New Buildings Updated: August 23, 2013 + 21

Scenario 3A - Two New Middle Schools Updated: August 23, 2013 500 Students Scenario 3A New 500 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 18 Mo. New 500 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) Renovate to New - West Side MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (480 Students) Renovate to New - Cutler MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (465 Students) Demolish Bulter ES Demolish Pleasant Valley ES Demolish Chester ES Demolish Portables at Barnum ES Demolish Portables at Morrison ES 18 Mo. 16 Mo. 16 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. 6 Mo. 3 Mo. 3 Mo. Mid-Year Move + 22

Scenario 3A - Two New Middle Schools Scenario 3A Cost Breakdown Updated: August 23, 2013 Gross Building Area Total Project Cost Net Cost to Groton 500 Students 1 New 500 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) 93,000 $ 48,050,764 $ 27,678,314 2 New 500 Student 6-8 Middle School (Site to be determined) 93,000 $ 48,050,764 $ 27,678,314 3 Renovate to New - West Side MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (480 Students) 74,200 $ 30,187,495 $ 15,833,819 4 Renovate to New - Cutler MS to PK-5 Elementary School for projected enrollment (465 Students) 71,871 $ 29,459,316 $ 15,449,880 5 Demolish Bulter ES 37,450 $ 1,296,226 $ 1,296,226 6 Demolish Pleasant Valley ES 40,408 $ 1,342,125 $ 1,342,125 7 Demolish Chester ES 43,581 $ 1,380,097 $ 1,380,097 8 Demolish Portables at Barnum ES 1,800 $ 347,809 $ 347,809 9 Demolish Portables at Morrison ES 1,800 $ 347,809 $ 347,809 + TOTAL: $ 160,462,406 $ 91,354,394 23

Summary Comparison Updated: August 23, 2013 Total Project Cost Net Cost to Groton Remarks 1 Scenario 1 $ 139,183,069 $ 75,682,486 Refer to Scenario 1 Summary and Detail 2 Scenario 1A $ 156,098,019 $ 84,754,670 Refer to Scenario 1A Summary and Detail 3 Scenario 2 $ 149,282,194 $ 80,177,106 Refer to Scenario 2 Summary and Detail 4 Scenario 3 $ 169,000,399 $ 93,142,417 Refer to Scenario 3 Summary and Detail 5 Scenario 3A $ 160,462,406 $ 91,354,394 Refer to Scenario 3A Summary and Detail + 24

Committee Discussion School Construction Discussion & Q&A + 25

Breakout Discussion Bearing in Mind Discussions on School Construction, Programming, Configuration & Demographics. What is the preferred future for Groton Schools? Discuss & Rank Scenarios Reconvene Group Consensus + 26

Update on Site Selection + 27

Site Selection Update Conducted initial feasibility and test fits for single middle Identified 10 potential sites for single 175,000-200,000 sq ft middle school Process will be informed by committee consensus on preferred Scenarios + 28

Single Middle School Matrix Criteria Minimum Preferred Site Suitability Acreage 20-25 Acres 25+ Acres LA Test Fit Good fitting of bldg; siting; topo; wetlands; site work; minimal grading; good vehicular flow Excellent fitting of bldg; siting; topo; wetlands; site work; minimal grading; good vehicular flow Water Available in proximity Available on site Sewer Available in proximity Available on site Transportation Access Reasonable access Collector or Arterial Access Location Geographically central Within 2 miles of center Within 1 mile of center Demographically Central Within 1 mile of 20% Within 1 mile of 30% Potential for Ped Access Fair Good Appurtenances Playground/ Fields Softball, Baseball, Multi-purpose, play yard, basketball Minimum plus community fields + 29

Single Middle School Matrix Criteria Minimum Preferred Compatibility with Surrounding Land Use Adjacent Land Uses Site Disposition Ease of Gaining Site Control Current Site Status (Environmental) Compatibility with Town Plan Development Area/ Economic Development Commercial and Industrial nonconfliciting uses Willing Private Seller Limited site clean-up required Not within POCD Conservation Area Civic uses/ schools/ proximity to residential neighborhood Already in Town Control with no conservation easements Greenfield Site No known Economic Development Interest + 30

Matrix Site Suitability Location Appurtances Least Adventageous Most Adventageou 1 3 5 Size 15-20 Acres 20-25 Acres 25+ Acres LA Test Fit Site not suitable Meets Test Fit Meets Test Fit + Water not promimate proximate onsite Sewer not proximate/ sewer avoidance area Proximiate or Flanders Road extention area onsite Transportation Access Geographically Central Demographically Central Potential Pedestrian Playgrounds/ Fields Local Roads/ Local Collector Collector Minor Arterial/ Arterial Periphery 2 Miles Geographic Center Periphery Walking not possible (topography, traffic, distance) Does not meet minimum requirements Within 1 mile of 20% of students Near neighborhoods, no current sidelwaks or trails Meets minimum requirements Within 1 mile of 30% of students Sidewalks connect to neighborhoods Sufficient space on site to accommodate ahtletic fields for school and community use Compatability with LU Adjacent Land Uses Incompatable/ Potential Conflicts Shades of grey Civic Uses/ Schools/ Proximity to Residential Neighborhoods Site Disposition Ease of Gaining Site Control Environmental Private Known Environmental Hazards Town control with Easements Demolition required Town Control, no easements Greenfield Compatability with Town Plan No known economic Development Area/ + In conservation Economic Economic area development area Development development 31 interest