White Paper: What Component Compliance Means for CAT6A System Performance



Similar documents
with Component Rating A Simple Perspective

White Paper: 10 Gigabit Ethernet over Twisted Pair Copper Systems

An Engineer s Guide to Full Compliance for CAT 6A Connecting Hardware

Testing 10 Gb/s Performance of Category 6 and 6A Structured Copper Cabling Systems within the Unified Physical Infrastructure SM (UPI)

Overcoming OM3 Performance Challenges

Mixed High-Speed Ethernet Operations over Different Categories of Bundled UTP Cable

HIGHSPEED ETHERNET THE NEED FOR SPEED. Jim Duran, Product Manager - Americas WHITE PAPER. Molex Premise Networks

IT Cabling Solutions

Evolution of Cabling Standards TIA/EIA ISO/IEC CENELEC. by Paul Kish NORDX/CDT Chair TIA TR 41.8

Total Solutions Verification

Leviton Network Solutions Certified Contractors

Enhanced Category 5 Cabling System Engineering for Performance

DATA CENTER NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE. Cable and Connectivity for the Most Demanding Networks. BerkTekLevitonTechnologies.com

White Paper. Cat. 6A vs. Cat. 6 A. What s the Difference and Why Should I Care?

The Permanent Link in Field Certification Reasons, Advantages, Testing Challenges

R&Mfreenet Advanced Cat 6 A Unshielded Connection Module

Data Communications Competence Center

GigaSPEED X10D Solution How

New Technology Developments and How They Impact Your Structured Wiring Choices

Data Center Network Infrastructure The Smart Choice For Your Data Center

Category 8 Cable Transmission Measurements Comparative Study between 4-port single wire measurements and 2-port balun measurements

The Evolution of Copper Cabling Systems from Cat5 to Cat5e to Cat6 Copper Cabling Standards and Technical Aspects

Data Centers Re-Enforce Best Practices To Assure Optimal Installation Quality and Maximize Margins For 10GBASE-T"

Copper Patch Cords. Impact On Network Performance and Reliability

Session 2; Cabling Technology in the Data Centre Media Choices; Copper Twisted Pair

Method for improving Return Loss in order to reduce PHY power Ron Nordin Panduit Bob Wagner Panduit Paul Vanderlaan Berk-Tek

Cabling for 10GBASE-T and Beyond - A Tangled Web

10 Gigabit Ethernet over copper: Unshielded, unprotected?

Arista and Leviton Technology in the Data Center

Abstract: This document examines the alien NEXT performance of various bundled cables and measures the impact upon various networks performance.

Cabling Standards Update 2014

Innovative Connectivity Solution for Maximum Performance and Security

PANDUIT TX6 10GIG SHIELDED COPPER CABLING SYSTEM. Innovative Connectivity Solution for Maximum Performance and Security

Accelerating Light. Copper Cabling Solutions. Category 6A

Installation Effects Upon Alien Crosstalk and Equal Level Far End Crosstalk

Performance Verification of GigaSPEED X10D Installations with Fluke Networks DTX 1800 CableAnalyzer

The effect of temperature on the bandwidth of telecommunications cabling in commercial buildings. Focus on the IBDN System 4800LX from NORDX/CDT

Running 1000BASE-T Gigabit Ethernet over Copper Cabling 30 March 1999 Colin Mick/The Mick Group with Bruce Tolley/3Com and Willem Wery/Intel

Cable Sharing in Commercial Building Environments

The Effect of Network Cabling on Bit Error Rate Performance. By Paul Kish NORDX/CDT

Advantages of 4 th Generation CAT 6A UTP Cables. Antonio Cartagena Business Development - Caribbean Leviton Network Solutions

Planning for 10Gbps Ethernet over UTP Questions to Ask When Planning the Cabling Plant WHITE PAPER

Network Design. Yiannos Mylonas

Ethernet and UTP Cabling from 10BASE-T to 10GBASE-T

Data Centre Cabling. 20 August 2015 Stefan Naude RCDD The SIEMON Company

Copper Cabling Troubleshooting Handbook

Broadband Video over Twisted Pair Cabling. By Paul Kish Director, IBDN Systems & Standards NORDX/CDT

Network Engineers Everywhere:

Innovation. Volition Network Solutions. Leading the way in Network Migration through Innovative Connectivity Solutions. 3M Telecommunications

How To Get 40G Over Copper (Wired) And 40G On Coaxian (Wireless) Cable (Wired Coaxian) (Wired Cable) (Wireline) (Powerline) And 50G Over Coaxian Cable (Wire Coaxian

Nathan Dayton ADNET. ADNET SYSTEMS, Inc. Slide Number 1

Data Centre & Enterprise Solutions. RapidNet

Telephone Line Distribution Module

Category 6 UTP - Cabling System

Introduction. Investigation

Implementing Fast Ethernet

SMARTen 24 UTP Patch Panels

Wireless and Wired Networking Specifications

ethernet alliance 10GBASE-T: 10 Gigabit Ethernet over Twisted-pair Copper Version 1.0 August 2007

The High Cost of a Low-Cost Cable Certification Tester

SYSTIMAX Copper Solutions Designed for the Digital Generation

Discussion Paper Category 6 vs Category 5e Cabling Systems and Implications for Voice over IP Networks

Issues Affecting the Design and Choice of Cabling Infrastructures within Data Centres

White Paper: DC Resistance Unbalance Testing: Easy, Low-Cost Insurance for Your PoE Systems

CAT 6A. Reference Guide

How to Choose the Right Cable Category

De-Mystifying Cabling Specifications

802.3bp Baseline Optional Link segment

Model CFA-24 Transparent Cable Farm Automation Switch

Gigabit Ethernet on Copper Cabling Infrastructures

Smart Cabling: Constructing a cost effective reliable and upgradeable cable infrastructure for your data centre/enterprise network

Physical Infrastructure trends and evolving certification requirements for Datacenters Ravi Doddavaram

Feasibility Study on High Speed Transmission over UTP Cables

SYSTIMAX Solutions. GigaSPEED X10D Shielded (F/UTP, S/FTP) Solution Guide Europe, Middle East and Africa Regions.

ANSI/TIA/EIA A, Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling Standard.

Impedance Matching. Throughput SOLUTIONS NETWORK PERFORMANCE. Only the TrueNet Impedance-matched System Protects Network Performance

What are the requirements for a Home Network?

Agilent Test Solutions for Multiport and Balanced Devices

Mócsi László Levente strukturált kábelezési rendszermérnök Certified SYSTIMAX Engineer KFKI-LNX zrt.

Table of Contents. Fiber Trunking 2. Copper Trunking 5. H-Series Enclosures 6. H-Series Mods/Adapter Panels 7. RSD Enclosures 8

Category 8 Cabling Standards Update

Revision 1.10 April 7, 2015 Method of Implementation (MOI) for 100BASE-TX Ethernet Cable Tests Using Keysight E5071C ENA Option TDR

Category-6 / Class-E Cabling

Copper Cabling Infrastructure Offering

DeSoto County Chooses Siemon & Cyber Technology Security for 21st Century School District

NORTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SECTION STRUCTURE CABLING TESTING

Best Practices for Data Center Infrastructure Design

R&S ENY81-CA6 Coupling Network For radio disturbance and immunity measurements

1000BASE-T1: 3-Port Conversion/Balance Measurement for Cables and Components

From OPEN Alliance BroadR-Reach PHYs to IEEE 802.3bp RTPGE

IP TELEPHONY A REVOLUTION FOR STRUCTURED CABLING SYSTEMS

HIGH SPEED COMMUNICATIONS PLENUM CABLE CATEGORY 5e CMP FEP JACKETED, PVC-FREE UNSHIELDED TWISTED PAIR (UTP)

With the advent of Gigabit Ethernet

CATEGORY 8: UNDERSTANDING THE NEW CATEGORY OF PERFORMANCE FOR BALANCED TWISTED PAIR CABLE

Annex 113A Description of cable clamp and test setup. (informative) 113A.1 Overview

Datasheet: DSX-5000 CableAnalyzer

Data Center. Pre-terminated. Patch Panel System. Cabling Systems Simplified. Patch Panels. 10G + Gigabit. Patch Cords. Plug & Play Installation

Networking 101 (Networking Basics) Presentation to UCHUG - 1/03/07 G. Skalka

Nexus Technology Review -- Exhibit A

Cable Discharge Event

Transcription:

White Paper: What Component Compliance Means for CAT6A System Performance Gary Bernstein, RCDD Director of Product Management Copper Systems Leviton Network Solutions Jeff Seefried Development Engineering Manager Leviton Network Solutions February 2009

Table of Contents Introduction 3 Does Component Compliance Guarantee Channel Performance? 4 Worst-Case Alien Crosstak Testing at the Component Level 4 Disturbing the Peace Identifying the Significant Ports 5 Don't Be a Victim 6 Put It All Together 8 Show Me the Channel 9 Conclusion 11 Leviton Network Solutions 2

Introduction When it comes to structured cabling performance, the objectives of a standard are both to ensure the performance of present, foreseen and perhaps unforeseen applications, and to allow interoperability of components from multiple manufacturers that make up a structured cabling system. Ensuring the performance of applications has rarely been an issue, since the requirements defined in TIA 568B.2, and ISO 11801 are in excess of what typical applications such as Ethernet require, as developed in IEEE 802.3an. For example, the fact that some CAT6 cabling can work for 10GbE is due in part to the extra performance margin TIA built into the CAT6 standard. Manufacturers often design their structured cabling solutions to have the best margins when their components are combined as a system in an installation. This approach takes advantage of tradeoffs that can be made when the performance envelope of each component is known. This envelope is typically narrower than what the standard requires for each component if the design is robust and manufacturing variables are well-controlled. Connectors can be designed to work best with a given cable and/or patch cord so as to optimize channel performance. When a structured cabling system has components from different manufacturers, the overall performance margin can drop, due to the need to work with connectivity that may be anywhere in the performance envelope defined by the standard for a channel or permanent link. To combat this, a competent manufacturer will design extra margin into a component-rated connector, patch cord, or cable. The result is excellent performance margin, both with a manufacturer s own components and with a mix, if the end-user so chooses. Leviton Network Solutions 3

Does Component Compliance Guarantee Channel Performance? With the advent of 10GbE, alien crosstalk (AXT) requirements are defined in TIA 568B.2-10, both at the channel, permanent link level, and the component level. In some instances, meeting component requirements for AXT for each part of the system whether cable, connector, or cord does not guarantee that the resulting channel or permanent link will meet AXT limits. The sum of the parts does not ensure the whole, as is normally true for internal parameters like NEXT and RL. The standard acknowledges this in Annex B, section B.1 and Annex C, section C.1, stating that in addition to component performance verification, cable and connectors should be verified for compliant channel AXT performance. This is because alien crosstalk can take many forms, not only differential to differential, but common mode to differential mode conversion. These different manifestations of AXT are affected by the balance of the component. The better the electrical balance of a cable, connector or cord, the better it is able to reject these common mode conversion forms of AXT, and the better AXT margin a channel has when made up of these components. Leviton CAT6A component-rated connectivity is designed and tested to exceed the currently published AXT component requirements, so that not only will these components work well in a mixed channel, but maximum performance can be attained in a full Leviton structured cabling system. Leviton Network Solutions 4

Worst-Case Alien Crosstalk testing at the Component Level Component AXT testing for connecting hardware involves two setups: one for Alien Near End Crosstalk (ANEXT) and one for Alien Far End Crosstalk (AFEXT). For a given panel or wallplate, a victim port is selected, and the crosstalk from each disturbing port is measured. The results are summed to give a worst-case Power Sum Alien Near End Crosstalk (PSANEXT), or Power Sum Far End Alien Crosstalk (PSAFEXT). The TIA standard defines limits for connecting hardware AXT, as well as a limit for how many disturbers must be included in the summing of crosstalk affecting the victim port. These significant disturbers are those ports that exceed the 90-20log(f/100) limit for AXT when measured from the victim port. In a typical installation, a significant disturbing link can be nearly any port in a panel, depending on how the cabling is bundled, whereas significant ports in a panel are generally located very near the victim port. Figure 1 shows several panels arranged together with a victim port selected. Figure 1: Victim port surrounded by disturber ports Leviton Network Solutions 5

Disturbing the Peace Identify the Significant Ports In this example, we focus on measuring the AXT seen by the victim jack from neighboring ports (disturbers). This crosstalk can come from the connectors, the traces on the PWBs and the IDCs associated with each port. Figure 2 shows the results of measuring several ports surrounding the victim port for significant disturbers. Depending on the panel configuration, approximately 24-30 ports must be checked for significant ANEXT or AFEXT relative to a selected victim port. This process is time consuming, since ports are tested moving outward from the victim port in all directions until non-significant disturbers are found. One victim-disturber port combination is tested at a time, using a vector network analyzer to apply a signal to each disturber wire pair, listening for any coupling of that signal to any of the four victim port wire pairs. Figure 2: Relationship of victim port to significant and non-significant disturbers Leviton Network Solutions 6

Don t be a Victim Figure 3 shows a graph of the 16 pair-to-pair alien crosstalk measurements that were taken to determine the significance of just one port to the victim port. Figure 3: Pair-to-pair ANEXT between selected victim port and disturber port 2 This example shows the port to be significant, since the AXT measured exceeds the significance limit set by the TIA standard. As such, it will be included in the summing of all significant disturbers to the victim port. Only those pair combinations that exceed the significance limit will be selected for the calculation, and only at the frequencies they exceed it. Notice that, for a disturber port located adjacent to the victim port, this disturber is remarkably quiet. Careful attention to port isolation at the connector, PWB and IDC level ensures this Leviton CAT6A patch panel will have margin to spare. Once significant disturbers are known, one can calculate the AXT the victim port sees and compare this against the component requirements of the standard. In this test setup, only 6 disturbers were found to have significant ANEXT to include in the power sum calculation, though 24 ports were checked. Leviton Network Solutions 7

Put It All Together Figure 4 shows the results for the Leviton CAT6A patch panel, recently verified by Intertek (ETL) to meet the component requirements of TIA 568B.2-10. Even when surrounded by several disturbing ports, the typical victim port in this patch panel has plenty of AXT margin relative to the standard. PSANEXT - CAT6a Patch-Panel with 6 Significant Disturbers -20.0-30.0-40.0-50.0-60.0 ANEXT (db) -70.0-80.0-90.0-100.0 Limit pair 1 pair2 pair3 pair4-110.0-120.0 1 10 100 1000 Frequency (MHz) Figure 4: Component PSANEXT of Leviton's CAT6A Patch Panel This process is repeated for determining the amount of PSAFEXT seen by the victim port. Significant disturbers are located using AFEXT measurement techniques, and the results are power summed. Connectors like these which exceed TIA requirements can be installed into CAT6A permanent links and channels and have exceptional results. When installed using Leviton cords and horizontal cable from Leviton partners, system alien crosstalk margin is maximized. Leviton Network Solutions 8

Show Me the Channel What is the installed performance of a CAT6A structured cabling system made up of component compliant jacks, panels, cords and cable? The new Leviton CAT6A componentrated patch panel tested for this paper was installed in the first two positions of a four connector 100M channel. The third connector was Leviton s component-rated CAT6A 110 block, and the fourth, Leviton s CAT6A component-rated connector. An approved CAT6A UTP horizontal cable was used. Rounding out the system is Leviton s component compliant SlimLine patch cords. The 6 around 1 topology is shown in Figure 5: Component ID Description 1 Patch Cord 2 Patch Panel 3 Horizontal Cable 4 110 block (CP) 5 Workstation Jack Figure 5: 4-Connector, 6 around 1 channel topology Below is the channel PSANEXT performance of this topology, tested to TIA 568B.2-10 limits. Figure 6: 4-Connector, 100M Channel PSANEXT Leviton Network Solutions 9

Figure 7 shows the PSAACR-F performance of the same topology. Careful test preparation using a calibrated instrument with a very quiet noise floor is needed to capture this parameter. Figure 7: 4-Connector, 100M Channel PSAACR-F Maximum performance is available using Leviton components exclusively, with margin available if other cords or cables are used. These graphs show the excellent margins possible when components and cable are designed to work with each other. Alien crosstalk is one of the more challenging parameters to mitigate, with several coupling modes to deal with. Minimizing both near and far end alien crosstalk in the channel involves addressing each of these modes of coupling in each component, as well as looking at how and where along the frequency of interest each component contributes to the measured channel performance. Leviton Network Solutions 10

Conclusion When combining standard-compliant connecting hardware which meets CAT6A component specifications with compliant horizontal cable, the result should be an optimized system. This system will typically meet the channel and permanent link performance requirements. However, to assure the highest channel margin, both for internal parameters and the alien crosstalk parameters explored here, it is critical that the cable and connecting hardware be tuned together. Leviton components have been designed and verified with that in mind. When putting together a system of CAT6A connectivity and cable, ensure that applications such as 10GBase-T are supported well, with margin to spare. A component-rated panel, jack, cord or cable is only as good as the channel performance the combination is able to achieve. The technologies in a Leviton-based solution enable the highest performance available in the industry. Leviton Network Solutions 11

leviton.com 800.722.2082 leviton network solutions DIVISION HEADQUARTERS 2222-222nd St. S.E., Bothell, WA 98021-4422 USA T 800.722.2082 F 425.487.9486 E salesupp@leviton.com leviton CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 201 N Service Road, Melville, NY 11747 USA T 800.323.8920 F 800.832.9538 E info@leviton.com leviton INTERNATIONAL regional headquarters Middle East (also serving Turkey, India, and North Africa) T +971.50.5514211 F +971.4.886.4723 E infolme@leviton.com Latin America T +52.55.5082.1040 F +52.55.5386.1797 E lsamarketing@leviton.com China T +852.2774.9876 F +852.2774.1741 E infochina@leviton.com Canada T +1.514.954.1840 F +1.514.954.1853 E pcservice@leviton.com leviton INTERNATIONAL offices ASEAN Countries T +65.98244468 F +65.94649592 E infoasean@leviton.com South Korea T +82(0)10.3285.8287 F +82.2.773.1847 E intl@leviton.com Europe T +47.900.94.924 F +47.40.60.30.31 E infoeurope@leviton.com Australia & New Zealand T +64.4.562.8327 F +64.4.562.8327 E intl@leviton.com B/9 #2797