PO-CON679E Multi Pesticides Residue analysis in Ayurvedic cough Syrup by GCMS/MS using QuEChERS extraction method ASMS 206 ThP 47 Durvesh Sawant (), Ankush Bhone (), Dheeraj Handique (), Prashant Hase (), Sanket Chiplunkar (), Ajit Datar (), Jitendra Kelkar (), Pratap Rasam () and Tina Kukreja (2) () Shimadzu Analytical (India) Pvt. Ltd., A/B Rushabh Chambers, Makwana Road, Marol, Andheri (E), Mumbai-40009, Maharashtra, India. (2) Guru Nanak Institute of Research and Development, G. N. Khalsa College, Matunga, Mumbai-40009, Maharashtra, India.
Introduction Ayurveda is a Sanskrit term, which means science of life []. In India, Ayurveda has been long practiced for medicinal purpose. Majority of it s preparations involve presence of plants, herbs etc. (Figure ). For the normal, disease-free growth of these plants and herbs, pesticides are widely used. Some of these pesticides can act as toxins to animals & humans when consumed even as residues. Hence, it becomes important to quantitate the pesticides at residual levels in orally consumed preparations, especially which involve plant materials such as Ayurvedic cough syrups. QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged & Safe) method was used for extraction and clean-up of the sample followed by analysis using GCMS-TQ8040 Triple Quadrupole (GCMS/MS) system (Figure 2) from Shimadzu Corporation, Japan. Figure. Ayurvedic herbs Method of analysis Sample preparation Sample extraction Extraction of pesticides was done using modified AOAC QuEChERS method, as given below [2]. 2
Take 0 ml of homogenized Ayurvedic cough syrup sample, add 0 ml of deionized water Add 0 ml of acetonitrile, vortex for min. Add QuEChERS salt (Restek Cat # 26236 : 6 g MgSO 4 +. g NaAcetate), shake and vortex for min. Centrifuge at 000 rpm for min. Allow to stand for min for phase separation Draw 6 ml from upper extract of acetonitrile for further cleanup Transfer the extract to dspe tube containing cleanup mixture [Restek Cat # 26226 : 900 mg anhydrous MgSO 4, 0 mg PSA (Primary secondary amines) and 0 mg C8], vortex for 2 min. Centrifuge the mixture at 000 rpm for min. Collect 4 ml acetonitrile layer, evaporate to dryness and reconstitute in 4 ml ethyl acetate Filter through a 0.2 µm PTFE membrane filter Inject 2.0 µl of the clean extract into GCMS-TQ8040 Preparation of solvent standard calibration levels Individual pesticides obtained from Sigma-Aldrich were diluted using ethyl acetate to prepare stock solution of about ppm standard mixture of more than 0 analytes. From this, working stock of 0. ppm was prepared. It was then used to make solvent standards at concentration levels of ppb, 0 ppb, 2 ppb, 0 ppb and 00 ppb. Preparation of matrix matched standard calibration levels Locally purchased Ayurvedic cough syrup was used as a sample. It was extracted as per the flowchart shown in sample extraction to prepare matrix blank. Further it was spiked with above calibration levels to prepare matrix match linearity of 0. ppb, ppb, 2. ppb, ppb and 0 ppb. Preparation of pre-extraction spike In order to study the extraction efficiency of the method, recoveries of the pre-extraction spiked samples were studied. For this, 0 g sample was spiked with 00 ppb solvent standard to prepare pre-extraction spike concentration levels of 0. ppb, ppb and ppb. These samples were extracted, analyzed and quantified against matrix match linearity (post-extraction spike) to study their recoveries. 3
MRM method development For MRM method creation, Shimadzu s Smart Pesticide Database Ver. was used. For this, retention times of all analytes were predicted with the help of n-alkane standard mixture. Pre-optimized MRM transitions present in Smart Pesticide Database and accurately predicted retention times, enabled creation of MRM method with overlapping segments resulting in optimum dwell time required for high sensitivity. MRM chromatogram acquired using this method is shown in Figure 3. For each component, minimum two MRM transitions were analyzed. GCMS/MS Analytical Conditions The analysis was carried out on Shimadzu GCMS-TQ8040 as per the conditions given in Table. Table. Analytical conditions Chromatographic parameters Column : SH-Rxi -Sil MS (30 m L x 0.2 mm I.D. x 0.2 µm) Injection Mode : Splitless Sampling Time : 2.00 min Split Ratio :.0 Carrier Gas : Helium Flow Control Mode : Linear Velocity Linear Velocity : 40.2 cm/sec Column Flow :.2 ml/min Injection Volume : 2.0 µl Injection Type : High Pressure Injection Total Program Time : 4.87 min Column Temp. Program : Rate ( C /min) Temperature ( C) Hold time (min) 2.00 3.00 8.00 70.0 0.0 200.0 280.0 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mass Spectrometry parameters Ion Source Temp. : 230.0 C Interface Temp. : 280.0 C Ionization Mode : EI (Electron Ionization) Acquisition Mode : MRM 4
Results Extracted matrix blank sample was screened and none of the pesticides involved in this study were detected. Calibration curve was plotted for matrix matched standards in the range of 0. ppb to 0 ppb. Linear response with r 2 more than 0.98 was obtained. Pre-extraction spiked samples were analyzed six times and their % RSD was found to be less than 20 %. Recoveries of the same were in the range of 70 to 20 %. Based on linearity, precision and recovery, the LOQ for each analyte was determined. The statistical results for all analytes are shown in Table 2. Figure 4 depicts the detailed data for one of the pesticides, o,p -DDD (Sr. No. 28). Summarized LOQ data is listed in Table 3. Figure 2. GCMS-TQ8040 Triple quadrupole system by Shimadzu Key Features of GCMS-TQ8040. Smart Productivity : Analysis of 400 pesticides that used to require 2 or 3 methods, can now be accomplished in a single acquisition method by the new firmware protocol. 2. Smart Operation : Smart MRM technology creates optimal MRM methods automatically. The MRM Optimization Tool automates best MRM transitions for new compounds. 3. Smart Performance : ASSP achieves high sensitivity at scan speeds of 20,000 u/second. Fastest MRM 800 trans/sec. Single GC/MS mode with the maximum possible sensitivity and repeatability. (x00,000).0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0. 0.4 0.3 0.2 0. 0.0 7. 0.0 2..0 7. 20.0 22. 2.0 27. 30.0 32. 3.0 min Figure 3. MRM chromatogram for 0 ppb pesticide mixture of 2 pesticides
6 Multi Pesticides Residue analysis in Ayurvedic cough Syrup Table 2. Quantitation results Dichlorvos Phorate alpha-bhc beta-bhc gamma-bhc (Lindane) Chlorothalonil delta-bhc Etrimfos Chlorpyrifos-methyl Parathion-methyl Heptachlor Fenitrothion Metolachlor Aldrin Chlorpyrifos Parathion Pendimethalin Heptachlor-endo-epoxide Heptachlor-exo-epoxide Fipronil Allethrin-3,4 (Bioallethrin) trans-chlordane o,p'-dde alpha-endosulfan cis-chlordane Isoprothiolane p,p'-dde o,p'-ddd Oxyfluorfen Dieldrin beta-endosulfan Endrin p,p'-ddd + o,p-ddt Edifenphos Endosulfan sulfate Iprodione Bifenthrin Fenpropathrin lambda-cyhalothrin Name 6.27 2.78 2.9 4.7 4.39.29.77.88 7.28 7.62 7.88 8.97 9.70 9.7 9.83 20.24 2.63 2.86 2.87 22.08 22.60 23.06 23.3 23.64 23.66 24.48 24.73 24.9 2.4 2.3 2.94 2.94 26.27 27.8 27.2 28.74 29.03 29.27 29.27 Retention time (min) 8.00>93.00 260.00>7.00 28.90>44.90 80.90>44.90 80.90>44.90 26.90>68.00 28.90>82.90 292.0>8.0 28.90>93.00 263.00>09.00 27.80>236.90 277.00>260.00 238.0>62.0 262.90>93.00 33.90>27.90 29.0>09.00 22.0>62.0 34.80>23.00 32.80>262.90 366.90>22.90 23.0>8.0 372.80>263.90 246.00>76.00 94.90>60.00 372.80>263.90 290.0>8.00 246.00>76.00 23.00>6.00 36.00>300.00 262.90>228.00 94.90>60.00 262.90>9.00 23.00>6.00 73.00>09.00 27.80>236.90 34.00>24.00 8.0>66.0 26.0>20.0 8.0>2.0 Target MRM (m/z) 0.999 0.9992 0.9997 0.9999 0.999 0.9960 0.9997 0.9990 0.9982 0.9999 0.9986 0.9992 0.9986 0.9973 0.9986 0.9897 0.998 0.9997 0.9990 0.999 0.9942 0.998.0000 0.9974 0.9996 0.9980 0.9960 0.9996 0.9977 0.999 0.9907 0.9994 0.999 0.9923 r 2 2.84 8.78.7.40 4.8.7 0.9 6.4 0.3 8. 9.3 9.8 4.29 9.3 3.8 6.27 8.78 9.23 3.69 3.06 3.09 8.96.09 6.4 9.3 0.6 6.00 4.4 8.4 9.39 7.80 9. 4.28 2.26 6.4 6.09 4.6 0.76 2.2 % RSD (n=6) 94 0 87 6 20 4 2 4 3 03 2 98 20 90 07 3 07 09 7 9 6 9 93 96 94 8 9 04 02 2 0 87 % Mean recovery at LOQ Sr. No. 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 0 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 20 2 22 23 24 2 26 27 28 29 30 3 32 33 34 3 36 37 38 39 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. LOQ (ppb)
Table 2 (Continued). Quantitation results Sr. No. Name LOQ (ppb) Retention time (min) Target MRM (m/z) r 2 % RSD (n=6) % Mean recovery at LOQ 40 Permethrin- 3.3 83.0>68.0 0.997 3.76 9 4 Permethrin-2 3.7 63.0>27.0 0.9996 4.3 88 42 Cyfluthrin- 32.29 63.0>27.0 0.992 7. 43 Cyfluthrin-2 32.6 63.0>27.0 0.9987 2.7 08 44 Cyfluthrin-3 32.76 63.0>27.0 0.996.9 96 4 Cyfluthrin-4 33.08 63.0>27.0 0.9989 9.94 02 46 Etofenprox 0. 33.27 63.0>3.0 0.9999 6. 02 47 Fenvalerate- 34.28 22.0>9.0 0.9980.07 06 48 tau-fluvalinate- 34.4 20.0>200.0 0.9926 0.39 96 49 tau-fluvalinate-2 34.68 20.0>200.0 0.999 3.2 9 0 Fenvalerate-2 34.68 22.0>9.0 0.998 3.49 Deltamethrin- 3.4 22.90>93.00 0.9947 6.7 82 2 Deltamethrin-2 3.86 22.90>93.00 0.999 9.28 96 Overlay of precision data Calibration curve Recovery overlay 3.0 (x,000) (#) (#2) 3.2 (#3) 3.00 (#4) (#) 2.7 (#6) 2.0 2.2 2.00.7.0.2.00 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.00-0.2 24.2 24.0 24.7 2.00 2.2 2.0 min Area (x00,000) 3. 3.0 2. 2.0..0 0. 0.0 0.0 2..0 7. Conc. 3.0 (x,000) 3.2 3.00 2.7 2.0 2.2 2.00.7.0.2.00 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.00-0.2 Matrix blank Pre extraction spike Post extraction spike 24.2 24.0 24.7 2.00 2.2 2.0 min % RSD at 0. ppb LOQ (n=6) Linearity (r 2 ) % Mean recovery at 0. ppb LOQ 4.4 0.9999 Figure 4. Detailed data for o,p'-ddd Table 3. LOQ summary result LOQ Level (ppb) 0. No. of compounds 20 3 9 7
Conclusion Smart Pesticide Database feature enabled automatic creation of MRM method with overlapping segments and optimum dwell times for achieving high sensitivity at trace level. All the analytes involved in the study showed LOQ less than or equal to ppb. The MRM method developed for these pesticides can be used for screening various Ayurvedic syrups. References [] Vaidya Dash, Acarya Manfred, A Handbook of Ayurveda, (983),. [2] Pesticide Residue in Foods by Acetonitrile Extraction and Partitioning with Magnesium Sulfate (AOAC Official Method 2007.0), (2007), 06. Disclaimer: The products and applications in this presentation are intended for Research Use Only (RUO). Not for use in diagnostic procedures. First Edition: June, 206 For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedure. This publication may contain references to products that are not available in your country. Please contact us to check the availability of these products in your country. www.shimadzu.com/an/ The content of this publication shall not be reproduced, altered or sold for any commercial purpose without the written approval of Shimadzu. Company names, product/service names and logos used in this publication are trademarks and trade names of Shimadzu Corporation or its affiliates, whether or not they are used with trademark symbol TM or. Third-party trademarks and trade names may be used in this publication to refer to either the entities or their products/services. Shimadzu disclaims any proprietary interest in trademarks and trade names other than its own. The information contained herein is provided to you "as is" without warranty of any kind including without limitation warranties as to its accuracy or completeness. Shimadzu does not assume any responsibility or liability for any damage, whether direct or indirect, relating to the use of this publication. This publication is based upon the information available to Shimadzu on or before the date of publication, and subject to change without notice. Shimadzu Corporation, 206