Los Angeles Metro Rapid

Similar documents
When is BRT the Best Option? 1:30 2:40 p.m.

Evaluation Criteria and Mode Progression for RouteAhead Rapid Transit Projects

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

transit service policy july 2012

Mount Royal College Transit Service Plan

Montgomery County Bus Rapid Transit System Information Technology Needs

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

BRT BUS RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Date August 28, 2013

MEMORANDUM. Robert Nichols, Acting Corridor Design Manager Northgate Link Extension

National Bus Rapid Transit Institute (NBRTI) At the University of South Florida

d r a f t Division Street: 15.4 du/a Damen Avenue: 14.1 du/a Western Avenue: 12.8 du/a

Transitways and the RouteAhead for Calgary Transit

Measuring the Street:

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (Metro) Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) Overview

Bus Priority Measures in Calgary: Past, Present and Future. Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng., Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

Bus Rapid Transit Service Design

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

Improving Access in Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus Executive Summary

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

Mayors Welcome Strong Surrey Votes Yes Coalition Support. Yes Vote Would Vastly Improve Transit and Transportation in Fast Growing City

SWANSEA METRO PROJECT (BUS RAPID TRANSIT) Gwyn Ephraim Arup David Whitehead City and County of Swansea

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about DART

5.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

MANAGEMENT PLAN. Fiscal Year

Addendum to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

FY16 Budget Public Forum. Saturday, April 25, 2015

LRT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

Proposed Service Design Guidelines

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES FIGURES

CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)

Strategic Regional Transit Plan

Best Practice: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System

Transit Service Assessment

TRAIN WRAPS TIMETABLE ADS TICKETS STATION POSTERS METROLINK MATTERS NEWSLETTER STATION SAMPLING WEBSITE: METROLINKTRAINS.COM

College of Southern Maryland. Hughesville Transportation Study

4.5 TRANSPORTATION, TRAFFIC AND SAFETY

ExpressLanes CAG Summit. March 2, 2010

PAPS- LA.

Applying for Access. Access Services. What is Access?

2012 King County Metro Transit Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures

Metro Met..,.u... T,...,...,...,

Metropolitan Setting l

Questions and Answers about the Orange Bus/Rail Investment Plan

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

Expo Light Rail Line. Expo Board Presentation Monthly Project Status Update May 7, 2015

Get Connected with Metro-North

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

Multi Modal Roadway Transportation Impact Fees and Asset Value

URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLANNING IN TEHRAN AND THE OUTCOME OF THE IMPLEMENTED BRT LINES

Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :

in Marina Del Rey Prepared by: County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works

7.0 Transportation Management

GREAT STREETS FOR LOS ANGELES

30 Years of Smart Growth

~ Metro Metrapolita Tnnsportation Authority

Traffic Signal Priority (TSP) and Automatic Vehicle Tracking System (AVTS) For Calgary Transit Buses

March 2015 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Regional Peer Review PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project

Memo. Date: January 18, StarTran Advisory Board. From: Brian Praeuner. Review of Peer Transit Systems

Integrated Public Transport Service Planning Guidelines. Sydney Metropolitan Area

ATTACHMENT TO NOTICE TO FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEM VEHICLE SUPPLIERS REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI 001)

Monitoring Program Results and Next Steps

A smart mobile fare collection system for public transit

FREDericksburg Regional Transit (FRED) REAL-TIME SCHEDULING SOFTWARE, BUS STOP ANNUNCIATOR AND TRANSIT WEBSITE PROCUREMENT

Integrated Public Transport Control Systems Information Day

Item No Halifax Regional Council January 14, 2014

Florida Avenue Multimodal Transportation Study. June 19, 2013

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

CHAPTER 7 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT/ INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

Transportation Alternatives

ExpressPark - An Intelligent Parking Management System for Downtown Los Angeles

Appendix J Santa Monica Travel Demand Forecasting Model Trip Generation Rates

Multi-Modal Corridor Degree of Complexity: High Cost/Benefit: High

Transit Technology Alternatives

Transcription:

Los Angeles Metro Rapid

Why BRT In Los Angeles Public dissatisfied with slow bus service Average bus speeds had declined by 10% since late- 1980s LADOT found that 50% of the time a bus is in service it is stopped Metro and City of Los Angeles developed Metro Rapid Program Goal of Rapid to improve bus speeds by 20-25% Did not go in with specific ridership projection Ridership increased followed with improved service 2

Metro Rapid Began in June 2000 with two demonstration lines Wilshire/Whittier Ventura Two demo lines resulted in up to a 49% increase in corridor ridership Up to an average 29% improvement in bus travel times 1/3 of the ridership were new to transit, 1/3 from other parallel corridors, and another 1/3 from existing corridor riding more often 3

Metro Rapid Attributes 1. High Capacity Buses 2. Branded Buses and Stations 3. Bus Signal Priority 4. Frequent Service 5. Simple Route Alignment 6. Less Frequent Stops 7. Integrated with Local Bus Service 8. Level Boarding and Alighting 9. Exclusive Lanes 10. Off-vehicle Fare Payment Primary Attributes Expansion Attributes 4

High Capacity Buses All buses CNG powered 60-foot low floor articulated buses with 3 doors and 57 seats Also use low floor 45-foot buses with 46 seats 5

Branded Stations 6

Metro Rapid Rapid began as new service in addition to local service on two demo corridors Allowed customers to choose and adjusted Local/Rapid service levels accordingly Later tried to implement Rapid cost neutral Consent Decree later allowed no more than 1/3 of local service on corridor to become Rapid 7

Bus Signal Priority Metro uses two bus signal priority systems that reduce bus delay and assist in maintaining bus spacing Majority of routes use loops and transponders A few routes with large segments outside the City of Los Angeles use an onboard computer that requests bus signal priority via wireless communications MTA Page 8

Passenger Information Real-time next bus information at stations 9

Metro Rapid Bus Stops Local bus stop spacing averages every.2 miles Metro Rapid stop spacing averages every.7 miles Metro Light Rail average station spacing every 1.0 miles Metro Heavy Rail average station spacing every 1.2 miles Metro Rapid stops typically busiest bus stops on route Minimum of 250 daily boardings at stop 10

Where We Are Today Regional network is nearly complete 21 Metro Rapid Corridors operated by Metro 3 additional Rapid corridors operated by two Municipal Operators Approximately 400 Peak Buses Nearly 400 miles through 33 cities 1,500 intersections with Bus Signal Priority Passenger travel times improved by an average of 20% over local service Corridor Ridership has increased on those corridors with Metro Rapid service 51% of all system bus boardings are in Rapid corridors 11

What s Next Exclusive bus lanes Board approved Wilshire BRT Project in May 2011 Off-vehicle fare payment Beginning Countywide Bus Lane Study that will also look at operational measures to improve bus speeds 12

Wilshire BRT Project Goals Improve bus passenger travel times (24%). Improve bus service reliability (32%). Improve traffic flow along Wilshire Boulevard. Repave the curb lanes along damaged portions of Wilshire Boulevard. Encourage shift from automobile use to public transit (increase in ridership of 15-20%). Improve air quality in Los Angeles County. Minimize impacts to existing on-street parking. 13

Typical Wilshire Operation Today

Future Wilshire Operation 15

Wilshire BRT Project Just completed environmental analysis in May 2011 Wilshire Boulevard from MacArthur Park to Santa Monica City Line Project length 12.7 miles within City & County of L.A. Includes 7.7 miles of dedicated peak period bus lanes Buses would operate with mixed flow traffic where no bus lanes Bus lanes operate in weekday peak periods 7:00 am to 9:00 am and 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm Right-turning autos and bikes allowed Buses restricted to curb lanes except to pass when necessary 16

Wilshire BRT Project, contd. Other Improvements to corridor Traffic signal improvements (enhanced TPS, left-turn arrows) Turn lanes Selective street widening & street resurfacing/repaving 17

Wilshire BRT Project 18

Countywide BRT & Street Design Study August 2011 Board directed staff to study minimum of 5 BRT corridors including dedicated bus lanes Began RFP process for consultant to help with study Study will identify corridors that can accommodate dedicated peak period bus lanes & other bus speed improvements Study will also look at street design improvements around bus stops/stations Study will also include operational strategies such as all door boarding Dwell times on Metro Orange Line with pre-paid fares is half the time as Rapid Study to be completed by October 2012 19

Questions 20