Required spatial adjustment for co-registration of pre-fire NBR to postfire



Similar documents
Wisconsin Land Cover Image - Level 2

Metadata: Identification_Information. Data_Quality_Information. Spatial_Data_Organization_Information. Spatial_Reference_Information

NAIP_2011_3ft_color_wsps_83h_img (ImageServer)

Electric Substations. Metadata: Metadata also available as

GInfo. Data Warehouse. Metadata Preparation. Sammy Cheung S&T Division. Portal to Geotechnical Engineering Office geospatial data

Salinity Data Management Best Practices. August 3-4, Charleston, South Carolina Hosted by

September October 2015 Re-Classification Line. Frames 1-13 (Maps ID: 2015 MSP 09/15) What does this data set describe?

Software requirements * :

Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata: Extensions for Remote Sensing Metadata

Maryland Shallow Water Monitoring Program 2010 Continuous Monitoring

Utilizing Multi-Sensor Fire Detections to Map Fires in the United States

Metadata for Big River Watershed Geologic and Geomorphic Data

Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata

ESRI Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata

ADWR GIS Metadata Policy

Landsat Monitoring our Earth s Condition for over 40 years

A KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACH FOR REDUCING CLOUD AND SHADOW ABSTRACT

Introduction to GIS (Basics, Data, Analysis) & Case Studies. 13 th May Content. What is GIS?

Database of the Mines and Prospects of Idaho

Mississippi Private Schools 2015

TerraColor White Paper

The USGS Landsat Big Data Challenge

Understanding Raster Data

MAIN_SNP_TOPO.dgm_2m

Advanced Image Management using the Mosaic Dataset

Forest Service Southern Region Jess Clark & Kevin Megown USFS Remote Sensing Applications Center (RSAC)

Review for Introduction to Remote Sensing: Science Concepts and Technology

Land-Cover and Imperviousness Data for Regional Areas near Denver, Colorado; Dallas- Fort Worth, Texas; and Milwaukee-Green Bay, Wisconsin

Using Remote Sensing Imagery to Evaluate Post-Wildfire Damage in Southern California

Reprojecting MODIS Images

ANALYSIS OF FOREST CHANGE IN FIRE DAMAGE AREA USING SATELLITE IMAGES

A GIS helps you answer questions and solve problems by looking at your data in a way that is quickly understood and easily shared.

UTM: Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinate System

APPLICATION OF GOOGLE EARTH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BASE MAP IN THE CASE OF GISH ABBAY SEKELA, AMHARA STATE, ETHIOPIA

Obtaining and Processing MODIS Data

Development of an Impervious-Surface Database for the Little Blackwater River Watershed, Dorchester County, Maryland

Land Use/Land Cover Map of the Central Facility of ARM in the Southern Great Plains Site Using DOE s Multi-Spectral Thermal Imager Satellite Images

ENVI THE PREMIER SOFTWARE FOR EXTRACTING INFORMATION FROM GEOSPATIAL IMAGERY.

City of Tigard. GIS Data Standards

How To Write An Nccwsc/Csc Data Management Plan

SMEX04 Land Use Classification Data

Chapter Contents Page No

Rapid Disturbance Assessment & Services (RDAS) Program - Support to Wildfire. Brad Quayle RDAS Program Leader Everett Hinkley National Remote Sensing

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION

JACIE Science Applications of High Resolution Imagery at the USGS EROS Data Center

Remote Sensing and Land Use Classification: Supervised vs. Unsupervised Classification Glen Busch

Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata Part 1: Biological Data Profile

Frequently Asked Questions: Wetlands Mapper

OREGON GIS METADATA STANDARD

COASTAL MONITORING & OBSERVATIONS LESSON PLAN Do You Have Change?

Practical, Easy-to-Use, Free GIS and Remote Sensing Tools for Resource Management

THE RELATIONSHIP OF FIELD BURN SEVERITY MEASURES TO SATELLITE- DERIVED BURNED AREA REFLECTANCE CLASSIFICATION (BARC) MAPS

FIELD VALIDATION OF BURNED AREA REFLECTANCE CLASSIFICATION (BARC) PRODUCTS FOR POST FIRE ASSESSMENT

Fire Science Activities 2009 Carl Key, USGS NOROCK

Technical Study and GIS Model for Migratory Deer Range Habitat. Butte County, California

NATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE & WILDLIFE SCIENCE CENTER & CLIMATE SCIENCE CENTERS DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDANCE

INTRODUCTION TO ARCGIS SOFTWARE

LANDSAT 8 Level 1 Product Performance

Introduction to Imagery and Raster Data in ArcGIS

Supervised Classification workflow in ENVI 4.8 using WorldView-2 imagery

Resolutions of Remote Sensing

SESSION 8: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND MAP PROJECTIONS

Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021

2.3 Spatial Resolution, Pixel Size, and Scale

How Landsat Images are Made

Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission

Remote Sensing Method in Implementing REDD+

ArcGIS Data Models Practical Templates for Implementing GIS Projects

Chapter 4: Mapping Crime and Geographic Information Systems

Remote Sensing and GIS Application In Change Detection Study In Urban Zone Using Multi Temporal Satellite

SPOT Satellite Earth Observation System Presentation to the JACIE Civil Commercial Imagery Evaluation Workshop March 2007

Relating Land Cover Changes to Stream Water Quality in North Carolina

How To Update A Vegetation And Land Cover Map For Florida

Field Measurements for the Training and Validation of Burn Severity Maps from Spaceborne, Remotely Sensed Imagery

New York City Neighborhood Tabulation Areas

Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards Part 3: National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy

Big Data Volume & velocity data management with ERDAS APOLLO. Alain Kabamba Hexagon Geospatial

TerraAmazon - The Amazon Deforestation Monitoring System - Karine Reis Ferreira

Accuracy Assessment of Land Use Land Cover Classification using Google Earth

Stellwagen Bank/Jeffreys Ledge Restricted Area

SLC-off Gap-Filled Products Gap-Fill Algorithm Methodology

3D VISUALIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL WELLS DIRECTIONAL SURVEYS AND INTEGRATION WITH DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM)

The premier software for extracting information from geospatial imagery.

Partitioning the Conterminous United States into Mapping Zones for Landsat TM Land Cover Mapping

WATER BODY EXTRACTION FROM MULTI SPECTRAL IMAGE BY SPECTRAL PATTERN ANALYSIS

GIS User Guide. for the. County of Calaveras

APPLICATION OF MULTITEMPORAL LANDSAT DATA TO MAP AND MONITOR LAND COVER AND LAND USE CHANGE IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

Open-File Report By Daniel H. Knepper, Jr. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Applying High-resolution Satellite Imagery and Remotely Sensed Data to Local Government Applications

Texas Prairie Wetlands Project (TPWP) Performance Monitoring

Using Geocoded TIFF & JPEG Files in ER Mapper 6.3 with SP1. Eric Augenstein Earthstar Geographics Web:

Utah State General Records Retention Schedule SCHEDULE 1 GEOSPATIAL DATA SETS

Cloud-based Geospatial Data services and analysis

How To Map Land Cover In The Midatlantic Region

Image Registration. Using Quantum GIS

ArcGIS Agricultural Land Use Maps from the Mississippi Cropland Data Layer

Land Use/ Land Cover Mapping Initiative for Kansas and the Kansas River Watershed

Maryland Biological Stream Survey

Request for Proposals for Topographic Mapping. Issued by: Teton County GIS and Teton County Engineering Teton County, Wyoming

MODIS IMAGES RESTORATION FOR VNIR BANDS ON FIRE SMOKE AFFECTED AREA

Transcription:

Identification_Information: Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Forest Service Publication Date: 20090825 Title: Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity assessment of Fire Information: Fire Information Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Raster digital data for satellite imagery and derived products Vector data for fire perimeters Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Sioux Falls, South Dakota or Salt Lake City, Utah Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Forest Service Online_Linkage: http://edc.usgs.gov or http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/rsac/ Description: Abstract: Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) is a multi-year project conducted through a partnership between the USGS EROS and the USDA Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Center (RSAC). It is designed to consistently map the burn severity and perimeters of fires across all lands of the United States for the period spanning 1984 through 2010. MTBS is based on image processing and analysis methods currently utilized by the USGS and USFS for existing post-fire burn severity mapping efforts. The USGS Landsat Thematic Mapper image archive will provide a consistent and continuous source of 30 meter resolution data going back to 1984 for mapping burn severity of all fires greater than 1000 acres in the west and 500 acres in the east (east of 97W longitude). Purpose: The data generated by MTBS will be used to identify national trends in burn severity, providing information necessary to monitor the effectiveness of the National Fire Plan and Healthy Forests Restoration Act. MTBS is sponsored by the Wildland Fire Leadership Council (WFLC), a multi-agency oversight group responsible for implementing and coordinating the National Fire Plan and Federal Wildland Fire Management Policies. The MTBS project objective is to provide consistent, 30 meter resolution burn severity data and fire perimeters that will serve four primary user groups:1. National policies and policy makers such as the National Fire Plan and WFLC which require information about long-term trends in burn severity and recent burn severity impacts within vegetation types, fuel models, condition classes, and land management activities.2. Field management units that benefit from mid to broad scale GIS-ready maps and data for pre- and post-fire assessment and monitoring. Field units that require finer scale burn severity data will also benefit from increased efficiency, reduced costs, and data consistency by starting with MTBS data.3. Existing databases from other comparably scaled programs, such as Fire Regime and Condition Class (FRCC) within LANDFIRE, that will benefit from MTBS data for validation and

updating of geospatial data sets.4. Academic and agency research entities interested in fire severity data over significant geographic and temporal extents. Supplemental_Information: The MTBS Fire-ID is generated by combining several attributes taken from Federal or State agency fire records.the first field is the Federal Agency or State identification, next is a code related to the sub unit of the reporting agency (i.e. specific forest, park, refuge, etc.), next is the agency code given to the individual fire, and lastly is the start date of the fire in the format: year month day.notes: some of the fields were not recorded for some fires. Records from different agencies contain different formats or incomplete information for the date of the fire.multiple agencies report the same fire, preferentially; a Federal agency record was used to identify a fire and duplicate MTBS fire IDs are also noted below.fires that were discovered with no corresponding fire record and met the fire size criteria were mapped and given an?unknown?,?state? or? agency? Fire-ID if it can be determined and a latitude, longitude and estimated start date: Unk-ddmmss-dddmmss-yyyymmddThe first ddmmss field refers to the north latitude of the fire centroid.the second dddmmss field refers to the west longitude of the fire centroid.the date field is the best estimate of the fire start date.note: An unknown fire may, in fact, have a corresponding fire record, but the fire record contains the wrong location and/or year of occurrence and could not be matched with the fire found on the Landsat imagery. Supplemental Fire Metadata Fire Information MTBS Fire ID: NPS-PWROCAWNP-8041-20081015 Duplicate MTBS Fire IDs: No duplicate fire IDs Fire Name (if known): DOG Date of Fire: October 15, 2008 State: California Agency: NPS MTBS Mapping Zone: Pacific Southwest Geographic Area: Northern California HUC4 Catalog Unit: 18020112 Type of Assessment: Extended Acres within Fire Perimeter: 695.7 Required spatial adjustment for co-registration of pre-fire NBR to postfire NBR X-shift adjustment: 0 meters (relative to post-fire NBR) Y-shift adjustment: 0 meters (relative to post-fire NBR)

Landsat Path and Row: 45/32 Pre-Fire Landsat Date/Scene ID: Landsat 5 TM; June 10, 2007 / 50450322007161EDC00 Post-Fire Landsat Date/Scene ID: Landsat 5 TM; May 30, 2009 / 50450322009150EDC00 Output Dataset Projection Albers Equal Area Units: Meters Datum: NAD83 Spheroid: GRS80 1st Standard Parallel: 29 30 00 2nd Standard Parallel: 45 30 00 Central Meridian: -96 00 00 Latitude of Origin: 23 00 00 False Northing: 0 False Easting: 0 Image Subset Corner Coordinates (center of pixel, projected meters) ULX: -2203890 ULY: 2267640 LRX: -2195670 LRY: 2259510 Rows: 272 Columns: 275 Pixel size: 30 meters Bounding Box North Latitude: 40.60970 (40 36 34.920866533) South Latitude: 40.58966 (40 35 22.7889178321) East Longitude: -122.54390 (-122 32 38.02559703) West Longitude: -122.56998 (-122 34 11.9213737068) Latitude and Longitude within Fire Perimeter Latitude: 40.598011 (40 35 52.8396) Longitude: -122.558517 (-122 33 30.6612) Fire Perimeter Generation Method: Manual dnbr offset value used to calculate RdNBR: 6 Burn severity thresholds No Data Threshold: -970 Increased Greeness: -150 Low Threshold: 80 Moderate Threshold: 310 High Threshold: 575

Product List: NPS-PWROCAWNP-8041-20081015_pre_refl.tif Subset of Landsat scene used for pre-fire image (Bands 1-5, 7; Unsigned 8- bit GeoTIFF) NPS-PWROCAWNP-8041-20081015_post_refl.tif Subset of Landsat scene used for post-fire image (Bands 1-5, 7; Unsigned 8- bit GeoTIFF) NPS-PWROCAWNP-8041-20081015_d.tif dnbr used for burn severity analysis and mapping; subset to the fire area (Signed 16-bit GeoTIFF) NPS-PWROCAWNP-8041-20081015_dt.tif Thematic dnbr; Derived by thresholding dnbr subset (8-bit GeoTIFF) NPS-PWROCAWNP-8041-20081015_rd.tif Relative dnbr; subset to the fire area (Signed 16-bit GeoTIFF) NPS-PWROCAWNP-8041-20081015.shp Perimeter of detectable fire area derived from satellite imagery (ESRI shapefile) NPS-PWROCAWNP-8041-20081015_cldshdw.shp Mask for clouds, shadow, snow or anomallies intersecting fire area (ESRI shapefile) d4532_20070610_4532_20090530.tif dnbr for full Landsat scene (path/row: 45/32) Processing Comments: Burn severity thematic categories 0 - outside fire perimeter 1 - unburned to low severity 2 - low severity 3 - moderate severity 4 - high severity 5 - increased greenness 6 - nodata/non-processing mask Time_Period_of_Content: Time_Period_Information:

Multiple_Dates/Times: Currentness_Reference: ground condition Status: Progress: Complete Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed Spatial_Domain: Bounding_Coordinates: West_Bounding_Coordinate: 40.58966 East_Bounding_Coordinate: 40.60970 North_Bounding_Coordinate: South_Bounding_Coordinate: Keywords: Theme: Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Theme_Keyword: Raster digital data Theme_Keyword: U.S. Geological Survey Theme_Keyword: USGS Theme_Keyword: Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Theme_Keyword: MTBS Theme_Keyword: Burn Mapping Theme_Keyword: Imagery Theme_Keyword: Fire Theme_Keyword: Landsat Theme: Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Category Theme_Keyword: imagerybasemapsearthcover Place: Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, dependencies, areas of special sovereignty, and their principal administrative divisions, Federal Information Processing Standard 10-4,): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology Place_Keyword: United States Place_Keyword: U.S. Place_Keyword:US Place_Keyword:October 15, 2008 Place: Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing Standard 5-2): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology Place_Keyword: NOT FOUND Temporal: Temporal_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Temporal_Keyword: 1999-present

Access_Constraints: FTP data sets are available to any user. Use_Constraints: There are no restrictions on use, except for reasonable and proper acknowledgement of information sources. Point_of_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: U.S.Geological Survey Contact_Position: Customer Service Representative Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 47914 252nd Street Address: USGS EROS City: Sioux Falls State_or_Province: SD Postal_Code: 57198-0001 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 605/594-6151 Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800/252-4547 Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 605/594-6933 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 605/594-6589 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: custserv@usgs.gov Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: fsedc@usgs.gov Hours_of_Service: 0800-1600 CT, M-F, -6 h GMT Contact_Instructions: http://mtbs.gov/contactus.html Data_Set_Credit: USGS and NASA Native_Data_Set_Environment: Oracle, ERDAS Imagine, & ArcInfo Data_Quality_Information: Attribute_Accuracy: Attribute_Accuracy_Report: MTBS geospatial data (both vector and raster) are generated using consistent methods and procedures. The differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dnbr) image datasets are examined on a fire by fire basis to develop a thresholded, or categorical, burn severity dataset. Quantitative_Attribute_Accuracy_Assessment: Attribute_Accuracy_Explanation: MTBS analysts examine the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dnbr) image for each fire in the context of remote sensing spectral data and any ancillary information available to the analyst. dnbr image data for each fire are thresholded into classes representing unburned areas; areas of low, moderate, high burn severities; and areas of increased vegetation response. Analysts follow guidelines established by subject matter experts in order to maintain consistency in discerning burn severity thresholds from fire to fire and minimize subjectivity. Logical_Consistency_Report: These Landsat data are collected from a nominal altitude of 705 kilometers in a near-polar, near-circular, sun-synchronous orbit at an inclination of 98.2 degrees, imaging the same 183-km swath of Earth's surface every 16 days. The pixels representing the bands for the

image are in the data set only once. Completeness_Report: Fire Perimeter Generation Method: Manual (from metadata) Positional_Accuracy: Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy: Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report: Each Landsat Thematic Mapper image used to create the burn severity assessment was precision terrain-corrected using 3-arc-second digital terrain elevation data (DTED), and georegistered using ground control points. This resulted in a root mean square registration error of less than 1 pixel (30 meters).lineage: Process_Step: Process_Description: These data products are derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper data. A pre-fire scene and a post-fire scene are analyzed to create a Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dnbr) image. The dnbr image portrays the variations of burn severity within the fire. The Landsat images are terrain corrected and geometrically rectifiedto an Albers Conical Equal Area map projection using the National Landsat Archive Production System (NLAPS). The images are further processed to convert bands 1-5 and 7 to at-satellite-reflectance. The Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) is computed for each date of imagery using the following formula: ((Band 4 - Band 7) / (Band 4 + Band 7)) x 1000 = NBR The differenced NBR is computed by subtracting the post-fire NBR from the pre-fire NBR: PreNBR - PostNBR = dnbr Further processing is required to generate the 'Relativized' dnbr (RdNBR). The RdNBR takes into account pre fire conditions related to the amount of vegetation cover vs. bare soil. In one sense, an area of 25% vegetation cover that burns completely should be considered 'high severity' as would an area of 100% cover that burned completely. The dnbr does not allow that distinction. To calculate the RdNBR, the analyst must determine the 'dnbr offset value': the average dnbr value of a nearby area of unburned vegetation (similar to the vegetation that did burn). The RdNBR is calculated as follows: (dnbr - dnbroffset)/ (Square Root of (PreNBR/1000)) = RdNBR Higher dnbr and RdNBR values are correlated with more severe burns. The dnbr image is evaluated to determine the threshold value between burned and unburned areas. The perimeter of the fire is delineated using the dnbr and/or post-fire reflectance image. The dnbr image, the pre-fire and postfire TM images, and a fire perimeter vector file are provided in digital

format. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: TM Process_Date: Unknown Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: U.S.Geological Survey Contact_Position: Customer Service Representative Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 47914 252nd Street Address: USGS EROS City: Sioux Falls State_or_Province: SD Postal_Code: 57198-0001 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 605/594-6151 Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 605/594-6933 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 605/594-6589 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: custserv@usgs.gov Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: fsedc@usgs.gov Hours_of_Service: 0800-1600 CT, M-F, -6 h GMT Distribution_Information: Distributor: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey Contact_Position: Principal Scientist, Land Cover Applications Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 47914 252nd Street Address: USGS EROS City: Sioux Falls State_or_Province: SD Postal_Code: 57198-0001 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 605/594-6151 Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 605/594-6933 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 605/594-6589 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: custserv@usgs.gov Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: fsedc@usgs.gov Hours_of_Service: 0800-1600 CT, M-F, -6 h GMT Contact_Instructions: http://mtbs.gov/contactus.html Resource_Description: Downloadable Data Distribution_Liability: No warranty expressed or implied is made by the

USGS regarding the use of the data, nor does the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. Standard_Order_Process: Digital_Form: Digital_Transfer_Information: Format_Name: Geo-TIFF Format_Version_Number: 1 Digital_Transfer_Option: Online_Option: Computer_Contact_Information: Network_Address: Network_Resource_Name: http://mbts.cr.usgs.gov/viewer Digital_Form: Digital_Transfer_Information: Format_Name: DNBR Geo-TIFF Format_Version_Number: 1 Digital_Transfer_Option: Online_Option: Computer_Contact_Information: Network_Address: Network_Resource_Name: http://mbts.cr.usgs.gov/viewer Digital_Form: Digital_Transfer_Information: Format_Name: Shape file Format_Version_Number: 1 Digital_Transfer_Option: Online_Option: Computer_Contact_Information: Network_Address: Network_Resource_Name: http://mbts.cr.usgs.gov/viewer Fees: None Turnaround: Same day Metadata_Reference_Information: Metadata_Date: 20090825 Metadata_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: U.S Geological Survey Contact_Position: Science & Applications BranchContact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 47914 252nd Street Address: USGS EROS City: Sioux Falls State_or_Province: SD

Postal_Code: 57198-0001 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 605/594-6151 Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 605/594-6933 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 605/594-6589 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: custserv@usgs.gov Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: fsedc@usgs.gov Hours_of_Service: 0800-1600 CT, M-F, -6 h GMT Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998 Metadata_Time_Convention: local time Metadata_Access_Constraints: None Metadata_Use_Constraints: None Metadata_Security_Information: Metadata_Security_Classification_System: None Metadata_Security_Classification: Unclassified Metadata_Security_Handling_Description: None Metadata_Extensions: Online_Linkage: http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile