Quality System Training Module 4 Data Validation and Usability



Similar documents
Air Monitoring Directive Summary of Feedback and Responses for Chapter 6 (Ambient Data Quality)

Successful Implementation of an Alternative Co-located Transfer Standard Audit Approach: Continuous Deployment of CTS Wind Sensors on a Tall Tower

QA Transactions and Reports

NSW Air Quality Monitoring Network: Quality Assurance Procedures

Data Management Implementation Plan

Brett Gaines Senior Consultant, CGI Federal Geospatial and Data Analytics Lead Developer

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING SYSTEM. Air Quality Monitoring... Easier. Faster. Better.

11.0 Instrument Equipment Testing, Inspection and Maintenance

Data Quality. Tips for getting it, keeping it, proving it! Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program

Ecology Quality Assurance Glossary

STATEMENT OF WORK. NETL Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-02NT41476

Data Quality Assurance and Control Methods for Weather Observing Networks. Cindy Luttrell University of Oklahoma Oklahoma Mesonet

TR SUPPLEMENTARY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF CONTINUOUS AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING STATIONS

AQS Site and Monitor Configuration

U. S. Department of Energy Consolidated Audit Program Checklist 5 Laboratory Information Management Systems Electronic Data Management

Annual Monitoring Network Plan Report

Ambient Air Quality Division Air Quality and Noise Management Bureau Pollution Control Department

An Introduction to. Metrics. used during. Software Development

APPENDIX N. Data Validation Using Data Descriptors

AIR QUALITY SURVEILLANCE BRANCH ACCEPTANCE TEST PROCEDURE (ATP) FOR. Teledyne Advanced Pollution Instruments Model 400 E Ozone Analyzer AQSB ATP 002

Guidelines on Quality Control Procedures for Data from Automatic Weather Stations

Sustaining Thailand National Air Quality Monitoring Network System

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN PART III: AMBIENT AIR MONITORING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES. Revision 3.

A.1 Sensor Calibration Considerations

High Volume PM10/TSP Calibration/Verification/Audit Guidance. Issued: 12/15/14 - FINAL

Ambient Air Monitoring Work plan For National Core (NCore) Monitoring Station

TSA of TCEQ Air Monitoring Program Austin, Texas September 7-28, 2010

Ecotech Air Quality Monitoring Data Acquisition System

ROAD WEATHER AND WINTER MAINTENANCE


Ambient Air Monitoring Work Plan National Core (NCore) Monitoring Station

US EPA REGION III QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Testing Automated Manufacturing Processes

TransCity Legacy Way Air Monitoring Network

Evaluating Laboratory Data. Tom Frick Environmental Assessment Section Bureau of Laboratories

Seeing by Degrees: Programming Visualization From Sensor Networks

IPS MeteoStar LEADS. The MeteoStar LEADS System: An Easy To Use, Cost Effective Air & Water Quality Monitoring & Reporting System

DRY CLEANING PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

J3.3 AN END-TO-END QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE MODERNIZED COOP NETWORK

The design of the Romanian national air quality monitoring network

Data Quality Assessment: A Reviewer s Guide EPA QA/G-9R

Standard Operating Procedure for Database Operations

EPA's Data Analysis and Reporting Tool (DART)

Building Credibility: Quality Assurance & Quality Control for Volunteer Monitoring Programs

WMO Climate Database Management System Evaluation Criteria

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

A Hybrid Modeling Platform to meet Basel II Requirements in Banking Jeffery Morrision, SunTrust Bank, Inc.

White Paper. Thirsting for Insight? Quench It With 5 Data Management for Analytics Best Practices.

Performance Evaluation of a Lower-Cost, Real-Time Community Air Monitoring Station

Jorine Campopiano US Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Schools Environmental Health Coordinator. May 27, 2014

Standard Operating Procedure for Training for Staff Working on the PM 2.5 Chemical Speciation Program

PERFORMANCE-BASED EVALUATION OF LABORATORY QUALITY SYSTEMS An Objective Tool to Identify QA Program Elements that Actually Impact Data Quality

Quality Assurance/Quality Control in Acid Deposition Monitoring

Issues/Concerns With Ambient Air Monitoring

International GMP Requirements for Quality Control Laboratories and Recomendations for Implementation

COPY. Revision History

3.3 Data Collection Systems Design Planning Documents Work Plan Field Sampling Plan (FSP)

Quality Assurance For Environmental Laboratories

9. Quality Assurance 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.2 FIELD SAMPLING QUALITY ASSURANCE 9.3 ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE Internal Quality Control

EVALUATING SOLAR ENERGY PLANTS TO SUPPORT INVESTMENT DECISIONS

Whitepaper. Data Warehouse/BI Testing Offering YOUR SUCCESS IS OUR FOCUS. Published on: January 2009 Author: BIBA PRACTICE

Continuous Monitoring Manual

Vmax Vyntus SPIRO. Advance your lung function testing experience

STS Federal Government Consulting Practice IV&V Offering

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENT QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN PART III: SUPERFUND (MACA) PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Electronic Data Validation Using the Locus Environmental Information Management System. Tricia Walters Locus Technologies

Final Report - HydrometDB Belize s Climatic Database Management System. Executive Summary

Case Study. Vermont Hospital: Advanced Analytics as a Preventative Maintenance Tool

National Database of Air Quality and Meteorological Information. Gregor Feig South African Weather Service

San Francisco Chapter. Jonathan Shipman, Ernst & Young David Morgan, Ernst & Young

Transcription:

Quality System Training Module 4 Data Validation and Usability Dennis Mikel EPA - Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 2008 Conference on Managing Environmental Quality Systems Some Definitions Verification is the process for evaluating the completeness, correctness, and conformance/compliance of a specific data set against the method, procedural, or contractual specifications. It essentially evaluates performance against pre-determined specifications, for example, in an analytical method, or a software or hardware operations system. Validation is an analyte- and sample-specific process that extends the evaluation of data beyond method, procedure, or contractual compliance to determine the quality of a specific data set relative to the end use. It focuses on the project s specifications or needs, designed to meet the needs of the decision makers/data users and should note potentially unacceptable departures from the QA Project Plan. The potential effects of the deviation will be evaluated during the data quality assessment. 2 1

Process Design Validation and Verification are part of a process It should be performed at many different points It should be performed by qualified staff It is the responsibility of QA and QC There are 4 levels of validated data Verification takes place early in process Validation takes place later in the process 3 The Process 4 2

Level 0 Levels of Validation Essentially raw data obtained from the DAS, Data have been reduced, but are unedited and unreviewed, nor adjusted. Level 1 Checks are performed by DAS software screening programs Qualitative checks are performed by field staff Quality control flags are assigned 5 Levels of Validation Level 2 Comparisons with independent data sets, such as meteorological and ambient pollution data Utilize database screening tools, SAS or SQL Level 3 Detailed analysis and final screening Validate so there are no inconsistencies among the related data Graphics programs used examine the overall consistency If you have met data use it to validate your pollution data!!! 6 3

Step 1: Visual Inspection Inspections are used to make sure the instruments are fully operational Sometimes the smell, sound or feel of an instrument isn t right (i.e., is something fishy!!) Instrument Diagnostics Some DAS record this information Routine Operation and Maintenance forms must be checked 7 Step 1: Visual Inspection 8 4

Step 1: Visual Inspection 9 Step 2: DAS Data Verification Data Acquisition Systems have built in verification techniques that can: Sense a change in an operation Can receive a signal from instrument that there is a problem Can flag data that is out of range or exceeds a limit 10 5

Step 2: DAS Data Verification A few techniques Did the value exceed the preset maximum limit? Did the value exceed the preset minimum limit? Did the value exceed a defined rate of change? Fall time or rise time Does the data need to have a percentage of valid readings to be considered valid? DAS will flag any data if exceeds your limits! This is performed as data are collected and is automated, how cool is that! 11 Step 3: Manual Review Manual Review pertains to a review of the data either before or after it goes to the central data base Review of a print out of the data Review of any flagged data Review of the high and lows of the data 12 6

Time NO (ppb) N0y (ppb) NO2 O3 (ppb) 2m Temp RH (%) 00:00 AM 1.53 5.86 2.01 33.8 2.1 53 1:00:00 AM 1.34 4.88 1.8 35.2 1.3 55 2:00:00 AM 1.28 4.45 1.51 37.8 0.8 52 3:00:00 AM 6.32 3.15-32.73 38.3 0.4 51 4:00:00 AM 1.17 4.14 1.9 33.5-1.1 62 5:00:00 AM 1.66 4.79 1.54 31.4-1.7 66 6:00:00 AM 1.47 4.55 1.51 32.2-1.4 61 7:00:00 AM 1.76 5.42 2.37 31.5-1.7 59 8:00:00 AM 2.86 6.85 1.96 32.3-0.9 51 9:00:00 AM 2.12 4.01-0.93 38.1 1 39 10:00:00 AM 2.03 3.62-1.56 40.6 2.7 33 11:00:00 AM 1.83 3.26-1.75 42.8 4.2 29 12:00:00 PM 1.83 3.22-1.84 44 5.7 27 13:00:00 PM 1.59 3.45-1.04 45 6.8 26 13 Step 4: Graphic Analysis Graphs can be used effectively to: Look at trends of data See how interactions occur For instance: NO2/NO interaction with Ozone NO tritrates in the presence of Ozone to form NO2 If NO generally will not be above baseline unless Ozone is tritrated out. 14 7

Step 4: Graphic Analysis 15 Step 4: Graphic Analysis 16 8

Step 4: Graphic Analysis 17 Step 5: Comparison Program Useful when there are more than one station in a network Used extensively in PAMS networks Expect Ozone and precursors to go up at one station Migrate to upwind sites Compare meteorological parameters Expect wind from one direction at multiple sites Internet Options AirNow Tech 18 9

19 Step 6: Data Base Screening Most Central Database program have: Screening routines that can allow User to compare datasets against other data User to compare datasets against historic data Other programs are available Use of Excel to compare data Use of SQL or SAS languages to screen for outlier values 20 10

Step 6: Data Base Screening A few techniques Does O3 rise when NO is dropping? Are NO/NO2 high in morning and evening? Are there any negative values? Does O3 correspond to high/rising Temp or Solar Rad? Did the Station temp exceed 30 o C? Does precipitation correspond to low Ozone, SO2, CO or NOy? 21 Step 7: Final Evaluation This is the last step of the process Usually it is the time to make final adjustments or invalidate data Compare data against the known standards Zero/span checks One point QC checks (i.e., precision checks) Flow Checks Multipoint Checks Audits Routinely collected instrument diagnostics 22 11

Step 7: Final Evaluation Validation tables State the MQOs of your system Give you a reference to the needs of the data users Three different types: Critical Operational Systematic Validation 23 SO2 - Span Drift (at 90 ppb) - EPA Burdens Creek 15.0% SO2-TEI-43C TLE 10.0% 5.0% Perecnt 0.0% -5.0% -10.0% -15.0% 1/1/2007 1/15/2007 1/29/2007 2/12/2007 2/26/2007 3/12/2007 3/26/2007 4/9/2007 4/23/2007 5/7/2007 5/21/2007 6/4/2007 6/18/2007 7/2/2007 7/16/2007 7/30/2007 8/13/2007 8/27/2007 9/10/2007 9/24/2007 10/8/2007 10/22/2007 11/5/2007 11/19/2007 12/3/2007 12/17/2007 12/31/2007 Span drift MQO Goal = + 10% 24 12

Step 7: Final Evaluation 25 Summary Verification and Validation are a process! This process is used to make sure the data collected are for its intended use! Utilize all of your tools!!! Collected instrument diagnostics Use of DAS screening techniques Manually review of data Use graphic displays Use central database tools Use validation MQO tables Data are ready to go into AQS!! 26 13