12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Similar documents
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Performance Report

Performance Elements

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

Update on the Development of MAP 21 Performance Measures

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Implementation Strategy

Summary of MAP-21 Matrix

HERS_IN. HIGHWAY ECONOMIC REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM (for) INDIANA. AASHTO Transportation Estimator Association Conference October 16, 2001

Performance-Based Planning and Programming

American Public Works Association Asset Management Task Force, 1998

MAP-21 Performance Management Implementation. Federal Highway Administration March 19, 2014 Webcast

South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

MAP 21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda

Technical Report 4: Congestion Management Process Final Plan for Adoption October 2015

Virginia's Transportation Performance Management System

State DOTs propose Safe Performance Measuring Program

Butch Wlaschin P.E. Director, Office of Asset Management, Pavements, and Construction FHWA

HOW WILL PROGRESS BE MONITORED? POLICY AREA. 1. Implement the 2040 Growth Concept and local adopted land use and transportation plans

How To Improve Transportation In Louisiana

ACCESS OHIO Ohio Department of Transportation

Chapter 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK PAGE 11

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

Florida s Transportation Visioning Summit Summary

Context Sensitive Design for Urban Transportation in West Philadelphia

Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan

Chapter 9: Transportation

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

May 13, Secretary Anthony Foxx U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Transportation Alternatives Program Performance Management Guidebook

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION. DOT Is Progressing toward a Performance-Based Approach, but States and Grantees Report Potential Implementation Challenges

7.0 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

7.0 Transportation Management

A Framework for Monitoring the Performance of Travel Demand Management and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction Activities

5 Performance Measures

SAN DIEGO - A BICYCLE FRIENDLY CITY

CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)

Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act

Regional Transportation Improvement Program

INDOT Long Range Plan

NEVADA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Discussion. Presented to ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Advisory Group July 29 th, 2015

BUSINESS PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2015

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN WHATCOM COUNTY A REGIONAL GUIDE TO ITS TECHNOLOGY

Appendix Performance Measure Memo

CHAPTER 8: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION STSTEMS (ITS)

Performance Area Safety

Resolution for 2035 Transportation Commission Planning Policies

2013 Benefit-Cost Analyses Guidance for TIGER Grant Applicants

The Preservation of Local Truck Routes: A Primary Connection between Commerce and the Regional Freight Network

County and UZA Cities and Towns Non-UZA Cities and Towns Regional Public Transportation Authority. June 2, 2015

Leveraging the U.S. Department of Transportation s Environmental Justice Strategy to Build Communities of Opportunity:

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Budget Forecast estimates that housing

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

Truck Lane Restriction Expansion

RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS

Measuring the Street:

A Presentation by the Project Managers: Rick Canizales Prince William County. Jana Lynott, AICP Northern Virginia Transportation Commission

The Establishing and Integrating Performance Measures Peer Exchange in Dimondale, Michigan

APPLICATION LAFAYETTE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

Florida Transportation Commission: A Meeting of the Modes

Draft Non Transportation Performance Measures Including Related Qualitative Assessment of Example Sections

City of Rockville Regional Development Impacts: Transportation Capacity Analysis. June, 2013

**The Winter 2010 edition of The Road Ahead newsletter is available online.

Traffic Safety Initiatives in Tampa Bay Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

A Bicycle Accident Study Using GIS Mapping and Analysis

State of Transportation - Data, Metrics & Modeling

Commuter Choice Certificate Program

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Traffic Information in NYC

Transportation Management Toolbox Strategies

SCOPM Task Force Findings on National-Level Performance Measures

Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis

Mosaic: Oregon s Value and Cost Informed Transportation Planning Tool

OM-13: Transportation Management and Operations

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

AASHTO SCOPM MAP-21 Checklist

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

Comprehensive Plan Policies that support Infill and Mixed Use

Performance Measures for Iowa Transportation Systems

Federal Requirements for Statewide Transportation Plans

Measure: Double Bike Lane Usage (T21)

Protected Bicycle Lanes in NYC

2013 Kansas Transportation Summit

CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Caltrans Strategic Management Plan

Analysis of the 2015 Senate Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The DRIVE Act

NEW JERSEY TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

white paper FHWA Asset Management Position Paper Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

How To Plan A City Of Mason

STATEWIDE PERFORMANCE MONITORING INDICATORS FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FINAL REPORT

How does CDOT rank among state DOTs?

United States House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Subcommittee on Highways and Transit

ASSET MANAGEMENT. ASHE East Penn Web-Ex October 17th, Asset Management The right solution at the right time. 1

Transportation Management

Transcription:

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE 12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface transportation spending, creates a data-driven, performance-based multimodal program to address the many challenges facing the U.S. transportation system. Performance management will lead to more efficient investment of transportation funds by focusing on national transportation goals, increasing accountability and transparency, and improving decision making. This chapter describes the performance measures and targets to be used in assessing system performance. RTC will develop annual reports to track progress toward achieving these targets and will continue to gather additional community input into the transportation planning process. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with States and MPOs, will establish national performance measures for several areas: pavement conditions and performance for the Interstate and National Highway System, bridge conditions, injuries and fatalities, traffic congestion, on-road mobile source emissions, and freight movement on the Interstate System. 128] 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

MAP-21 provides an 18 months period for the U.S. Department of Transportation, in consultation with State DOTs, MPOs, and other stakeholders, to develop rulemaking that establishes performance measures. States, in coordination with MPOs, will then set performance targets in support of those measures, and state and metropolitan plans will describe how program and project selection will help achieve the targets. While USDOT rulemaking may not occur for another year, RTC has collaborated with the FHWA Nevada Division Office, the Nevada Department of Transportation, and other stakeholder jurisdictions and agencies to develop preliminary performance measures. These performance measures and targets will be updated upon release of national and state performance measures. The national performance goals for federal highway programs established in MAP-21 include the following: Safety To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. Infrastructure condition To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair. Congestion reduction To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the NHS. System reliability To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system. Freight movement and economic vitality To improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development. Environmental sustainability To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment. Reduced project delivery delays To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies work practices. MAP-21 provides a framework for linking goals and performance targets with project selection and implementation. Performance plans will track the progress toward achieving these targets and will be used to facilitate a community dialog about the track record of the RTC s transportation program. RTC will develop the following performance plans: Metropolitan Transportation Plan, to be updated every four years, which will include a discussion of: o Anticipated effects of the improvement program toward achieving the performance targets, o How investment priorities are linked to performance targets Annual Metropolitan System Performance Report, which will include: o Evaluation of the condition and performance of the transportation system o Progress achieved in meeting performance targets o Evaluation of how transportation investments have improved conditions Annual Transit Performance Report, which will document progress toward meeting performance targets Transit Asset Management Plan Public Transportation Safety Plan National transit goals and performance measures will be developed by the Federal Transit Administration. These will include state of good repair (SGR) standards for measuring the condition of transit capital assets: Equipment Rolling stock Infrastructure Facilities Maintenance on roadway 129] 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

The performance measures build upon existing and planned data collection efforts. Both transit and roadway performance measures are included in table 12-1. Additional description of the performance measures is below. Safety Performance Measures Preventable transit accidents per 100,000 miles of service RTC tracks the number of preventable crashes that RIDE and ACCESS vehicles experience. While travelling on a bus is generally much safer than riding in other types of vehicles, RTC continuously strives to increase safety of transit travel. This data is currently reported to the RTC Board on a monthly basis. Number of crashes and number of crashes per vehicle miles travelled (VMT) This performance measure addresses private vehicles and utilizes data provided by NDOT. The reduction target of 50 percent by 2020 is consistent with the crash reduction goals in the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). RTC will report the number of vehicle crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists as well. Number of serious injuries per VMT Serious injuries resulting from automobile crashes are also tracked by NDOT. The 50 percent reduction goal is consistent with the SHSP. Number of fatalities and fatalities per VMT NDOT tracks the number of fatal crashes as well, and RTC will report this for crashes involving automobiles, pedestrians, and cyclists. The goal of zero fatalities is consistent with the SHSP. Miles of bicycle lanes added and percent of the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan completed Because providing designated space for bicyclists is an important element of multimodal safety, this performance measure tracks implementation of the master plan. RTC tracks the number of bicycle lane miles added each year and will identify the percentage of projects in the plan that have been completed. Implementing between 3 and 7 percent of the plan each year will keep the region on track to complete implementation of the master plan by 2035. Miles of sidewalk added or enhanced and percent of the ADA Transition Plan completed As described previously, making sidewalks more accessible will promote pedestrian safety. RTC will track the implementation of projects in the transition plan. Infrastructure Conditions/Transit State of Good Repair Performance Measures Pavement condition index for all roads RTC has an established management system to monitor pavement condition and determine resource allocation, as described in Chapter 6. An average condition index rating of 70 will be maintained, and no more than 5% of all pavements will have a condition index rating of less than 50 by the year 2020. Preventive maintenance of transit rolling stock and facilities the Short Range Transit Plan identifies an inspection and maintenance schedule for transit capital resources. This performance measure tracks the timeliness of implementation of inspections and corrective actions. Maintain industry standard vehicle life cycle RTC will maintain vehicles in good repair to the expected life cycle for transit rolling stock. The industry standard will vary by type of vehicle. Congestion Reduction Transit passengers per service hour Transit operating efficiency is a priority of the RTC. An RTC RIDE system-wide average of 30 passengers per service hour is the performance target. RTC currently tracks this data and provides regular reports to the RTC Board. Change in traffic congestion delay The travel demand model is used to forecast the average amount of delay caused to motorists by traffic congestion. This performance measure identifies an increase in minutes of daily delay increasing by no more than five minutes per person by 2035. Vehicle miles travelled per person This performance measure uses the regional travel demand model to estimate the number of VMT per person. The performance target is that VMT will grow minimally from 26 to 27 VMT per person by 2035. 130] 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

System Reliability Transit system on-time performance The goal of the RTC RIDE system is to have 90 percent of all transit stops occur on schedule. This data is currently collected and reported to the RTC Board. Freight Movement & Economic Vitality I-80 and Greg Street level of service (LOS) I-80 and Greg Street are significant freight corridors that go through the urban core, therefore the level of service on these roadways is used to measure freight mobility. The performance measure of a peak period LOS D will be used and tracked through the regional travel demand model. Environmental Sustainability Auto emissions RTC, in partnership with the Washoe County Health District Air Quality Management Division, monitors the emissions generated by on-road mobile sources. The performance target is that auto emissions remain under the emissions budget established in the State Implementation Program. Transit fleet mix The long-term performance target is the transition to cost-effective alternative fuels such as electric or compressed natural gas (CNG). This will require development of an alternative fuel maintenance facility. Alternative mode share by corridor This is a new data analysis element for RTC. Beginning in 2013, the agency will initiate a systematic program to document bicycle and pedestrian activity in key transit oriented development (TOD) corridors. Combined with vehicle counts and transit ridership data, this will allow the comparison of mode share changes over time. The target for the Virginia Street and 4th Street/Prater Way TOD corridors is 30 percent by 2035. Alternative mode share in the transit service area This is another new data analysis element for RTC, which will require use of regional data about pedestrian and bicycle activity as well as analysis of transit ridership and VMT within the transit service area. The performance target is 10 percent alternative mode use by 2035. 131] 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

The table below identifies the national transportation goals that have been identified, how these link to the RTP goals and applicable performance measures. The zero fatalities goal and crash reduction goals are consistent with the Nevada Strategic Highway Safety Plan. National Goal RTP Goal Annual Transit Performance Measures Performance Target Table 12-1 Safety Improve Safety Preventable transit accidents per 100,000 miles of service Number of crashes (vehicle, bike, pedestrian)/number of crashes per Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Number of serious injuries per VMT Number of fatalities (vehicle, bike, pedestrian)/number of fatalities per VMT Miles of bicycle lanes added & percent of Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan completed Miles of sidewalks added or enhanced & percent of ADA Transition Plan completed Infrastructure Condition/Transit State of Good Repair Congestion Reduction System Reliability Manage Existing Systems Efficiently Manage Existing Systems Efficiently Integrate All Types of Transportation Manage Existing Systems Efficiently Pavement Condition Index for Regional Roads Preventive maintenance of transit rolling stock and facilities Maintain industry standard vehicle life cycle Transit passengers per service hour Traffic congestion delay Vehicle Miles Travelled per person Transit on-time performance 0 (ongoing) Reduce by 50% by 2020 Reduce by 50% by 2020 0; reduce by 50% by 2020 3-7% of plan implemented per year 3-7% of plan implemented per year 70 (ongoing) 100% of transit preventive maintenance performed on time Varies by vehicle type 30 (ongoing) 25 min of traffic delay per person per day in 2035 27 VMT per person (ongoing) 90% transit on-time performance (ongoing) Freight Movement & Economic Vitality Integrate Land Use & Economic Development Improve Freight & Goods Movement Focus on Regional Connectivity I-80 level of service Greg Street level of service LOS D Environmental Sustainability Promote Healthy Communities & Sustainability Integrate Land Use & Economic Development Integrate All Types of Transportation Auto emissions Transit fleet mix alternative fueling technologies Alternative mode share by corridor Alternative mode share in the transit service area Maintain emissions under air quality budget 100% electric or CNG fleet by 2035 30% on Virginia Street; 30% on E. 4th Street/Prater Way 10% by 2035 132] 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

133] 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

rtcwashoe.com 775-348-RIDE THIS IS YOUR RTC 135] 2035 Regional Transportation Plan