Performance Elements
|
|
|
- Egbert Austin
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 Performance Elements National Goals Performance Measures Performance Targets Performance Plans Target Achievement Special Performance Rules Performance Reporting
3 National Goals Focus the Federal aid program on the following national goals: 1) SAFETY 2) INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITION 3) CONGESTION REDUCTION 4) SYSTEM RELIABILITY 5) FREIGHT MOVEMENT AND ECONOMIC VITALITY 6) ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 7) REDUCED PROJECT DELIVERY DELAYS
4 Considering National Goals National Highway Performance Program 23USC119(e)(2) Performance Driven Plan Metropolitan Transportation Planning 23USC134(h)(2) Performance Based Approach 49USC5303(h)(2) Performance Based Approach Statewide Transportation Planning 23USC135(d)(2) Performance Based Approach 49 USC5304 (d)(2) Performance Based Approach
5 Performance Measures Not later than 18 months after date of enactment USDOT, in consultation with State DOTs, MPOs, and other stakeholders will promulgate a rulemaking that establishes measures. Provide not less than 90 days to comment on regulation. Take into consideration any comments. Limit performance measures to those described under 23USC150(c).
6 Performance Measures For purposes of carrying out National Highway Performance Program USDOT will establish: Measures for States to use to assess: Condition of Pavements Interstate System National Highway System (excluding the Interstate) Condition of Bridges National Highway System Performance of: Interstate System National Highway System (excluding the Interstate)
7 Performance Measures For the purpose of carrying out the Highway Safety Improvement Program USDOT shall establish measures for States to use to assess: Serious injuries per vehicle mile travelled Fatalities per vehicle mile travelled Number of serious injuries Number of fatalities Measures used to assess safety on all public roads
8 Performance Measures For the purpose of carrying out the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program USDOT shall establish measures for States to use to assess: Traffic congestion On road mobile source emissions USDOT will establish measures for States to use to assess freight movement on the Interstate system.
9 Measure Consistency Data elements necessary to collect and maintain standardized data May be incorporated into requirements of each measure, as needed
10 NHTSA SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES CORE OUTCOMES Motor Vehicle Related Traffic Fatalities Annual Total Annual VMT based Rate Annual Totals by Contributing Factors Annual Totals by Person Category Motor Vehicle Related Serious Injuries Annual Total BEHAVIORS & ACTIVITIES Observed Seat Belt Use Drivers and Front Seat Outboard Passengers Traffic Law Enforcement Impaired Driving Arrests Seat Belt Citations Speeding Citations
11 Performance Measures for State Highway Safety Plans (HSPs) For the first HSP submitted under Section of the Motor Vehicle and Highway Safety Improvement Act of 2012, the performance measures required by the Secretary shall be limited to those developed by NHTSA and the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA). For subsequent HSPs, the Secretary shall coordinate with GHSA in making revisions to the set of required performance measures.
12 Transit Performance Measures DOT will establish state of good repair (SGR) standards for measuring the condition of capital assets of recipients including: Equipment Rolling stock Infrastructure Facilities DOT required to establish measures based on SGR standards within 1 year by rulemaking process.
13 Stakeholder Input National online dialogue to discuss options for measures and data elements. Dialogue open from September 13 th through September 23 rd. USDOT will consider input provided by stakeholders in the development of the proposed rule for performance measures.
14
15 How can we ensure that measures are based on consistent, accurate, and timely data?
16 Performance Targets States must coordinate, to the maximum extent practical with relevant MPOs in selecting a target to ensure for consistency MPOs must coordinate, to the maximum extent practical, with the relevant State/s in selecting a target to ensure consistency Coordination required with public transportation providers, to the maximum extent practical. States and MPOs must integrate other performance plans into the planning process
17 Performance Targets States must coordinate, to the maximum extent practical with relevant MPOs in selecting a target to ensure for consistency MPOs must coordinate, to the maximum extent practical, with the relevant State/s in selecting a target to ensure consistency Coordination required with public transportation providers. States and MPOs must integrate other performance plans into the performance based process
18 Performance Plans Metropolitan Transportation Plan 4 yr update Statewide Transportation Plan Metropolitan and Statewide Transportation Improvement Programs must include, to the maximum extent practical: a discussion of the anticipated effect of the improvement program toward achieving the performance targets established in the transportation plan, links investment priorities to performance targets
19 Performance Plans Asset Management Plan National Highway Performance Program Developed using process approved by USDOT Recertified every 4 years Strategic Highway Safety Plan Highway Safety Improvement Program Updated using process approved by USDOT USDOT to establish update frequency CMAQ Performance Plan Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Updated every 2 yrs State Freight Plan
20 Highway Asset Management Plan Risk based asset management plan States encouraged to include all infrastructure assets within the right of way Plan Contents pavement and bridge inventory and conditions on the NHS, objectives and measures, performance gap identification, lifecycle cost and risk management analysis, afinancial plan, and investment strategies
21 Highway Asset Management Plan USDOT, in consultation with State DOTs, will establish the process to develop the plan through a rulemaking no later than 18 months after 10/1/2012 States must have a plan developed consistent with the process by the 2 nd fiscal year, otherwise federal share for NHPP will be reduced to 65% Process certification USDOT 90 days review period to determine certification States have 90 days to cure deficiencies if not certified Recertification required every 4 yrs
22 Management Systems USDOT will establish minimum standards for States to use in developing and operating: Bridge management systems Pavement management systems Minimum standards established through a rulemaking Minimum 90 day comment period USDOT will promulgate a rulemaking not later than 18 months after date of enactment
23 Transit National Public Transportation Safety Plan Safety performance criteria for all modes of public transportation; the definition of the term state of good repair established under section 5326(b); minimum safety performance standards for public transportation vehicles used in revenue operations that do not apply to rolling stock otherwise regulated by the Secretary or any other Federal agency; and to the extent practicable, take into consideration relevant recommendations of the National Transportation Safety Board; and Recommendations of, and best practices standards developed by, the public transportation industry; and A public transportation safety certification training program, as described in subsection (c).
24 Transit Performance Plans Transit Asset Management Plan Transit asset management plan required for recipients and subrecipients of Federal financial assistance Content and update frequency to be established by DOT Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Comprehensive agency safety plan required to be established by each designated recipient of Federal transit funds or States Plan required within 1 year after effective date of a final rule issued by DOT to carry out the Public Transportation Safety Program
25 Annual Highway Safety Plans Performance Measures, including: Documentation of current safety levels for each measure Performance targets for each measure Justification for each target A Strategy for programming funds to meet the targets Data and analysis supporting proposed countermeasures Description of Funds the State plans to use to carry out the strategy Report on State s success in meeting the goals and targets of the previous HSP An Application for any additional grants available to the State under this chapter (Sec. 405) Plans are due July 1 beginning July 2013
26 Target Achievement National Highway Performance Program A State that does not achieve or make significant progress toward achieving the targets for 2 consecutive reports Document in 23USC150(e) report actions the State will take to improve their ability to achieve the target Highway Safety Improvement Program State has not met or made significant progress toward meeting the performance targets the date that is 2 years after the date of the establishment of the performance targets State must set aside formula limitation equal to the amount of HSIP funding obligated in the prior year to safety projects only and submit annually to the DOT a plan to achieve the targets
27 What challenges do you envision in setting targets?
28 Target Achievement MPO certification Applies to MPOs serving a transportation management area with a population over 200,000 USDOT certify that planning process complies with the requirements Failure to certify USDOT may withhold up to 20% of funds attributable to the metropolitan planning area Recertification required at least every 4 yrs
29 Performance Evaluation USDOT will establish criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of the performance based planning process of States Progress towards the achievement of targets Appropriateness of performance targets Cost effectiveness and efficiency of transportation investments Extent to which process relies on public input Ability of the public to access information to assess the performance of the State
30 Special Performance Rules National Highway Performance Program Interstate Pavement Condition Minimum condition level established by USDOT through rulemaking Condition falls below threshold set by USDOT for 2 consecutive reports then: NHPP funding set aside to address Interstate pavement conditions STP funds transferred to NHPP to address Interstate pavement conditions This obligation requirement stays in effect until the minimum thresholds can be met (checked annually)
31 Special Performance Rules National Highway Performance Program National Highway System Bridge Condition Greater than 10% of total deck area of bridges on the NHS are located on bridges classified as structurally deficient for 3 consecutive years then: NHPP funding set aside to address bridge conditions on the NHS This obligation requirement remains in place until minimum condition requirement is met (checked annually)
32 Special Performance Rules Highway Safety Improvement Program High Risk Rural Road Safety Fatality rate on rural roads increases over most recent 2 year period then: HSIP set aside required to address high risk rural roads Older Drivers Traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over the age of 65 increases during the most recent 2 year period then: Document in SHSP strategies to address increases in these rates
33 Performance Reporting State Report on Performance Progress Required initially by October 1, 2016 and every 2 years thereafter Report includes: Condition and performance of NHS Effectiveness of investment strategy for the NHS Progress in achieving all State performance targets Ways in which congestion bottlenecks in National Freight Plan are being addressed
34 Performance Reports Highway Safety Improvement Program Report Reporting frequency and content to be established by USDOT CMAQ Performance Plan Reporting required every 2 yrs Report on progress towards the achievement of targets
35 Performance Reporting Metropolitan System Performance Report Required in transportation plan every 4 or 5 yrs Report includes: Evaluate condition and performance of transportation system Progress achieved in meeting performance targets in comparison with the performance in previous reports Evaluation of how preferred scenario has improved conditions and performance, where applicable Evaluation of how local policies and investments have impacted costs necessary to achieve performance targets, where applicable Statewide Transportation Plan No required frequency Optional report on system performance
36 Transit Performance Reporting 49 USC 5326(c)(3) requires each designated recipient of Federal transit financial assistance to submit to FTA an annual report that describes The progress of the recipient during the fiscal year to which the report relates toward meeting the performance targets established under paragraph (2) for that fiscal year; and The performance targets established by the recipient for the subsequent fiscal year.
37 USDOT Performance Reporting Reports on Performance based Planning Process Submit to Congress within 5 yrs reports on effectiveness of the Metropolitan and Statewide performance based planning processes. Report evaluating: Overall effectiveness of performance based planning as a tool to guide transportation investments Effectiveness of the performance based planning process in each MPO and State
38 USDOT Performance Reporting National Freight Strategic Plan Freight Conditions and Performance Report Projects of National and Regional Significance Infrastructure Investment Needs Report Condition and Performance Report
39 What kind of performance reports would be effective at the national, regional, and corridor level?
40 Next Steps Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Fact Sheets and Q&A Webinars/Listening Sessions MAP21 Website feedback Websites: Key Contacts FHWA Measures Francine Shaw Whitson Reporting Connie Yew FTA John Giorgis NHTSA Jack Oates
Butch Wlaschin P.E. Director, Office of Asset Management, Pavements, and Construction FHWA
Butch Wlaschin P.E. Director, Office of Asset Management, Pavements, and Construction FHWA National Goals Focus the Federal-aid program on the following national goals: 1) SAFETY 2) INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITION
Update on the Development of MAP 21 Performance Measures
Update on the Development of MAP 21 Performance Measures TPB Technical Committee February 6, 2015 Eric Randall Department of Transportation Planning Item 9 MAP 21 Rulemaking National Goals Rulemaking Overview
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century. 2014 Performance Report
MAP 21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century 2014 Performance Report A report to Florida s Congressional Delegation March 2014 Overview: Because life is precious, FDOT has set the highway safety
Summary of MAP-21 Matrix
Summary of MAP-21 Matrix Overview On July 6, 2012, President Obama signed into law P.L. 112-141, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Funding surface transportation programs
MAP 21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda
MAP 21 themes Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems Creates jobs and supports economic growth Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda Simplifies and focuses the Federal
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century:
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century: IMPLICATIONS FOR OREGON OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Implications for Oregon December 2012 Oregon Department
AASHTO SCOPM MAP-21 Checklist
AASHTO SCOPM MAP-21 Notice of Proposed Rule-Making Checklist (CMAQ) AASHTO SCOPM MAP-21 Checklist Performance Area CMAQ Document Overview MAP-21 legislation requires States and MPOs to: Establish performance
Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES October 1, 2013 A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES How Do Performance Measures Assist the Public
American Public Works Association Asset Management Task Force, 1998
a comprehensive and structured approach to the long term management of assets as tools for the efficient and effective delivery of community benefits. Strategy for Improving Asset Management Practice,
South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures
South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures Prepared for: Prepared by: June 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 1.1 Baseline Understanding...
Stephen Gaj. Martin Kidner State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT
Stephen Gaj Leader, Asset Management Team, FHWA Martin Kidner State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT What is asset management? Asset management is a strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining,
Performance-Based Planning and Programming
Performance-Based Planning and Programming Matthew Hardy, Ph.D. Program Direction for Planning and Policy AASHTO September 17, 2013 2013 WVDOT/MPO/FHWA PLANNING CONFERENCE 1 Overview MAP-21 Requirements
FINANCIAL PLAN. Any future earmarks are assumed to carry their own limitation and not reduce the regular limitation identified in these calculations.
VII. FINANCIAL PLAN FHWA Funds The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds are appropriated by Congress. FHWA funding levels are identified in the six-year Transportation Act. Each year, a federal
CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)
Local Assistance Program Guidelines Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) CONTENTS Section Subject Page Number 4.1 INTRODUCTION... 4-1 4.2 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA... 4-1 General... 4-1
2012-2013 Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act
C h a p t e r 9 - F i n a n c i a l P l a n a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s f o r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t s A major component of the Plan (T2040)
Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:
Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES Prepared by: March 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction... 2 1.1 Performance Measures and the Public Sector... 2 1.2 National Focus: MAP
Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding
MPC 5.f Attachment 1 STP-U Eligibility Guidelines Page 1 of 5 Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES PERIOD AVAILABLE: FY + 3 Years FUND: Highway
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS October 2015 Background The Surface Transportation Program (STP) was originally established as Section 133 of
HERS_IN. HIGHWAY ECONOMIC REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM (for) INDIANA. AASHTO Transportation Estimator Association Conference October 16, 2001
AASHTO Transportation Estimator Association Conference October 16, 2001 HERS_IN HIGHWAY ECONOMIC REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM (for) INDIANA OVERVIEW HERS Background System Planning Tool Development HERS_IN Structure
ACCESS OHIO 2040. Ohio Department of Transportation
ACCESS OHIO 2040 ACCESS OHIO 2040 Ohio Department of Transportation May 2014 Table of Contents Introducing Access Ohio 2040...1 How AO40 was Developed...1 Public Outreach and Stakeholder Participation...2
Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000
1 of 8 12/27/2013 8:21 AM U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 MAP-21 - Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
INDOT 2000-2025 Long Range Plan
Chapter 9 INDOT 2000-2025 Long Range Plan Highway Needs Analysis Overview The statewide transportation planning process provides for the identification of highway needs through a comprehensive process
Safety Data Collection, Analysis, and Sharing
Safety Data Collection, Analysis, and Sharing About the HSIP Noteworthy Practice Series The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid highway program with the primary purpose of achieving
Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization. Certification Review Report. April 2012
Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization Certification Review Report April 2012 Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Tennessee Division Office Region 4 404 BNA Drive,
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. Initial Transportation Asset Management Plan (Pilot Version February 2015)
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Initial Transportation Asset Management Plan (Pilot Version February 2015) February 2015 Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Initial
New Mexico DOT Transportation Asset Management Implementation Plan. final plan
New Mexico DOT Transportation Asset Management Implementation Plan final plan February 23, 2015 report New Mexico DOT Transportation Asset Management Implementation Plan date February 23, 2015 Table
Technical Memorandum REVENUE FORECASTS. Prepared for: Prepared by:
Technical Memorandum REVENUE FORECASTS Prepared for: Prepared by: April 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 Inflation Indices... 2 1.2 Previous Studies... 3 2 Highway Revenue Baseline Forecast...
FAST ACT A GUIDE TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND RAIL-RELATED PROVISIONS FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ACT
A GUIDE TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND RAIL-RELATED PROVISIONS FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION ACT MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Enactment of the (FAST Act) was the culmination of years of work by the American
A Legislative Briefing prepared by Volume 7, Number 1 February 2001
fiscal forum A Legislative Briefing prepared by Volume 7, Number 1 February 2001 Mitchell E. Bean, Director P. O. Box 30014, Lansing, MI 48909-7514 517-373-8080! FAX 517-373-5874! www.house.state.mi.us/hfa
2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST
2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 806 CITICENTER BUILDING 146 SOUTH HIGH STREET AKRON, OHIO 44308 December 2012 This report was prepared by the Akron Metropolitan
GENERAL. This manual addresses five local programs that are funded under the current Highway Act:
OVERVIEW The Local Public Agency Manual published by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) is intended to be used as a guide for cities and counties that sponsor projects utilizing federal
Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?
Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There? The BRTB has adopted nine goals, with supporting strategies, performance measures, and performance targets. Together, these goals, strategies, measures, and
Northwest Region Division of Transportation Bureau of Indian Affairs
Northwest Region Division of Transportation Bureau of Indian Affairs Cinco D. Cronemeyer 911 NE 11 th Avenue Portland, OR 97232-4169 (503) 872-2872 [email protected] Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Asset Management Highway Division Plan
Asset Management Highway Division Plan 3/17/15 Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence 1 U.S. Transportation Agencies Challenges Rising Costs Higher customer demand for better and safer roads Highly
Traffic Safety Facts. Children. 2003 Data. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 2 to 14 years old.
Traffic Safety Facts 2003 Data DOT HS 809 762 Children Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 2 to 14 years old. In 2003, there were more than 60 million children under
INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR NAS. December 2010. Office Vehicle Safety Research National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR NAS December 2010 Office Vehicle Safety Research National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Office of Vehicle Safety Research (OVSR) consists of three
Traffic Signal Asset Management. Edward Fok USDOT/FHWA Resource Center
Traffic Signal Asset Management Edward Fok USDOT/FHWA Resource Center Fundamental Objectives 1. Preserve our assets and minimize their whole life costs. 2. Operate in a financially sustainable manner.
Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects
Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Economic Stimulus Program) Application Packet for: Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects APPLICATIONS DUE
Asset Management for MAP-21. Gary Lasham, P.E. Jonathan Pollack
Asset Management for MAP-21 Gary Lasham, P.E. Jonathan Pollack Replaced Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) MAP-21 is transforming the policy and programmatic framework for investments
Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of the Conference
Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of the Conference H.R. 22, Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) authorizes federal surface transportation programs through fiscal year (FY)
CONNECTICUT S TOP TRANSPORTATION ISSUES:
CONNECTICUT S TOP TRANSPORTATION ISSUES: Meeting the State s Need for Safe, Smooth and Efficient Mobility NOVEMBER 2015 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit
Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SAFETY CULTURE CONNECTION INSIDE Motorcycles Crashes Aren t Accidents What s Trending Buckle Up Nevada! Your Decision, but Who Pays? 1 2 3 4 5 Always Buckle Up Don t Drive Impaired Focus on the Road Stop
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
Implementing the New Section 5310 Program Individuals with Disabilities February 2014 1 Agenda Program Purpose Apportionment & Available Funding Eligible Projects Eligible Recipients and Subrecipients
Virginia's Transportation Performance Management System
Virginia's Transportation Performance Management System Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment Commonwealth Transportation Board Presented by: David Tyeryar, Deputy Secretary of Transportation September
5 Performance Measures
5 Performance Measures This page left blank intentionally. 5 2 Moving Forward Monterey Bay 2035 Introduction The investments identified in the 2035 MTP/SCS are expected to result in significant benefits
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CFDA 20.205 CFDA 20.219 CFDA 23.003 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION (Federal-Aid Highway Program) RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM I. PROGRAM
REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources
REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources THIS DOCUMENT IS IN TEXT ONLY FORMAT - A FULLY FORMATTED DOCUMENT WITH GRAPHICS IS AVAILABLE AT THE CT DOT WEBSITE
MAP-21. A Guide To Transit-Related Provisions MAP-21. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
MAP-21 MAP-21 A Guide T0 Transit-Related Provisions Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century A Guide To Transit-Related Provisions 1 MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century A Guide To
REPORT ON CERTIFICATION THAT THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
REPORT ON CERTIFICATION THAT THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS 2014 Prepared by: Assistance by: Reviews: Lincoln City-Lancaster County Planning Department
Implementation Strategy
Implementation Strategy 6 The following implementation strategy defines strategic points of intervention for complete streets programming, including visioning, goal-setting, local agency plans, coordination
14-97. 14-97.002 Definitions. For the purposes of this rule chapter the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly shows otherwise:
14-97 14-97.001 Purpose. This rule chapter sets forth an access control classification system and access management standards to implement the State Highway System Access Management Act of 1988. The implementation
Chapter 8 Funding Considerations
Chapter 8 Funding Considerations Expanding transit services into El Dorado Hills under any of the service alternatives has associated operating and capital costs. This chapter considers the funding sources
Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program. Ohio Department of Transportation
Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program Ohio Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Program Overview Program Administration.........2
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration SAFETY AWARENESS. 2007 Kentucky Freight Conference
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration SAFETY AWARENESS 2007 Kentucky Freight Conference FMCSA History Federal Highway Administration restructured in February, 1999 October 9, 1999 created a separate
SUMMARY: This notice announces changes in the Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/16/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-02821, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit
A Framework for Monitoring the Performance of Travel Demand Management and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction Activities
A Framework for Monitoring the Performance of Travel Demand Management and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction Activities WA-RD 806.1 Mark E. Hallenbeck June 2013 Orion Stewart Anne Vernez Moudon Office
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS: Meeting the State s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility SEPTEMBER 2014 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization
2013 Benefit-Cost Analyses Guidance for TIGER Grant Applicants
2013 Benefit-Cost Analyses Guidance for TIGER Grant Applicants Each applicant should provide evidence that the expected benefits of the project justify the costs (recognizing that some costs and benefits
DRAFT STIP Narrative, NYSDOT, March 2013 (for Oct 2013 to Sept 2017 STIP) Page i
DRAFT STIP Narrative, NYSDOT, March 2013 (for Oct 2013 to Sept 2017 STIP) Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT... 3 A. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS... 3 Metropolitan Planning
CHAPTER 1 Land Transport
Section 1 Road Transport - PART I - Summary of the Present Situation 1 Road Traffic Accident Trends 1-1 Long-term trends fell to below 6,000 for the first time in 54 years since 1953 Number of road traffic
Executive Order 13513. Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving
Executive Order 13513 Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving After completing this course you will be able to: 1. Define
