System Optimization: The First Step in CSO Control Alternatives Development



Similar documents
SFPUC s Vision A Multi-Billion Dollar Investment To Secure The Health and Economic Stability of the City of San Francisco

CONFIRMING WET WEATHER TREATMENT FACILITY HYDRAULIC DESIGN WITH PHYSICAL MODEL STUDY

Sewer System Improvement Program Update

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW LONG-TERM CONTROL PLAN Executive Summary

High-Rate Retention Treatment Facility for CSO Control in Windsor Riverfront East

HYDROVEX. CSO, SSO and Stormwater Management Specialist Products and Services for North America

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SUMMARY

City of East Lansing CSO Control Facility Evaluation Demonstrative Approach to Meet WQS

Scattergraph Principles and Practice Characterization of Sanitary Sewer and Combined Sewer Overflows

What is a CSO / SSO? Sewer Overflows. Prevalence of CSOs in the US. Magnitude of Problem (Local)

Click to edit Master title style

Executive Summary Consent Decree

TOWN OF CHESTERTON, INDIANA COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW LONG TERM CONTROL PLAN

Rouge River Watershed, MI Region 5. Community Case Study ROU-1. Number of CSO Outfalls. Combined Sewer Service Area. Wastewater Treatment Capacity

Update on the Metro Nashville Consent Decree Program. Scott Potter Ron Taylor

Basement Flood Risk Reduction City of Winnipeg. Charles Boulet

San Diego Citizen s Forum. USIBWC San Diego Field Office

The Clean Water Project What Is The Stormwater Impact?

Lansdowne Stormwater UPDATE

Town of Essex NE Lagoon. Service Area. Essex Plant. Service Area. Pumping Station No. 4. Wastewater Pumped To NE Lagoons (Treatment Plant No.

Based on the above, it is recommended that Lift Stations #1 and #3 be abandoned and their flows be diverted to the regional Lift Station #8.

APPENDIX F. Baker County. Mason Dam Hydroelectric Project FERC No. P Turbidity Monitoring Plan

CFD Modeling as a Tool for Clarifier Design

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

CHAPTER 3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Altoona Water Authority. Infrastructure Overview

Technical Feasibility of a Wet Weather Flow Treatment Facility

Module 9: Basics of Pumps and Hydraulics Instructor Guide

Cost Estimating Procedures for Raw Sewage Overflow Control Program

Executive Director, Engineering & Construction Services Director, Purchasing & Materials Management Division

Omaha Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Control Program

City and County of San Francisco 2030 Sewer System Master Plan TASK 400 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 405

Type of Sewer Systems. Solomon Seyoum

Maine Department of Environmental Protection Program Guidance On Combined Sewer Overflow Facility Plans

Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Incident Report Form

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

How do storm water and wastewater networks function together with the wastewater treatment plant? Theo G. Schmitt, Kaiserslautern University (Germany)

26th Ward Wastewater Treatment Plant Wet Weather Operating Plan

GIS in Wastewater Collection System Master Planning

FY 2016 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

Construction Site Inspection Checklist for OHC By making use of some simple Best Management Practices (BMPs) a construction site operator can

APPENDIX M-2 SANITARY SEWER TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Stadium Reconstruction EIR

Triple-Bottom-Line Analysis Screening of Final Alternatives

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Page 1 Chapter Design Criteria for Domestic Wastewater Systems

3.0 Existing Sewer System Facilities

Sanitary Sewer Overflows Leave Telltale Signs in Depth-Velocity Scattergraphs

Allegany County Combined Sewer Overflows - Long Term Control Plan

Micromanagement of Stormwater in a Combined Sewer Community for Wet Weather Control The Skokie Experience

Kansas City s Overflow Control Program

MARYLAND AVENUE BACKUPS DURING AUGUST 31, 2014 STORM EVENT COMMUNITY OUTREACH

Dan Ott Managing Engineer Collection System Johnson County Wastewater, KS and Rick Nelson CH2M HILL

11.0 City of Winnipeg Flood Protection Infrastructure

CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet

Sanitation District No. 1 of Northern Kentucky. SD1's Sanitary and Storm Water Asset Management Program. KSPE Annual Convention

Greater Ouachita Water Company. April 2015 Monthly Operations & Maintenance Report

PERMITTEE/FACILITY NAME: City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department / Detroit Wastewater Treatment Plant

A Systematic Approach to Reduce Infiltration and Inflow (I&I) and Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO) PETE GORHAM, P.E. MIKE LYNN FEBRUARY 19, 2015

Construction Specification for Sewer Bypass Flow Pumping

Toronto s Wet Weather Flow Master Plan

ZIONSVILLE WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 10-YEAR SEWER REHABILITATION REPORT

ATTACHMENT 3: SPECIFICATION FOR SEWER CLEANING

TOWN OF SURFSIDE UTILITY UPGRADE PROJECT Project Completion

1. Water Line Maintenance 2. Sanitary Sewer Maintenance 3. Spill/Leak/Overflow Control, Response, and Containment

SANITARY SEWER BACKUP. Causes & Prevention

Terry Biederman, PE- Director of Public Works Greg Gucwa, PE- Principal Johnson and Anderson Engineering

AN UPDATE ON LOUISVILLE MSD s BASEMENT BACKFLOW PREVENTION PROGRAM 10 YEARS AND 6,700 INSTALLATIONS LATER

SAWS SSO Reduction Program

Components of a Basement Flooding Protection Plan: Sewer System Improvements. November 2000

DRAFT Public Outreach Document for What s an SSMP?

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONSTRUCTION GRANTS & LOANS SECTION FAST TRACK AUDIT CHECKLIST

ecmar SECTION INSTRUCTIONS: Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

Grit Removal Identification and Removal Methods

Outlet stabilization structure

List of Figures List of Abbreviations Executive Report

District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority George S. Hawkins, General Manager

CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 109 DIVISION 003 SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER PUMP STATION DESIGN PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

SEWER SIPHONS AND ODOR CONTROL: A PRACTICAL APPROACH

Water and Sewer Utilities

The City of Ottawa Flood Hazards

Review of Footing Drain Disconnection Projects

PENNSYLVANIA 42 (STATE) (NUMBER)

Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Analysis Favors Green Infrastructure Over Offline Storages to Mitigate the Upper Olentangy CSOs

Collection Systems 2005 Sustaining Aging Infrastructure: System, Workforce and Funding

Greater Los Angeles County Region

Wastewater Collection System Supplemental Design Standards for Capital Improvement Program Projects

Transcription:

System Optimization: The First Step in CSO Control Alternatives Development Don Walker NEWEA 215 Specialty Conference Series October 26, 215

Outline System Characterization ü Groundwork for system optimization Examples of Typical Optimization Measures ü Static weir raising ü Localized hydraulic relief ü Vortex valves ü Bending weirs ü Pump station operations ü Use of remote flow/level monitoring to optimize existing facility operation Page 2

System Characterization First step in LTCP development ü Collection system mapping/gis ü Flow monitoring ü Inspection data ü Collection system modeling Develop system understanding & confidence in analytical tools used to assess optimization measures Page 3

Optimization Approach Search for opportunities what to look for: ü Large-diameter pipes with available capacity ü Flow restrictions/areas of high headloss ü Under-utilized tanks/facilities ü Pump capacities ü CSO regulator configurations Page 4

Modeling Tools Profiles Level and Flow vs. Time Color-coding output for pipe surcharge state, velocities, etc. Page 5

Example: Static Weir Raising Incrementally raise weir in model Crown el 1.2 54-in Combined Sewer Weir el 8.3 Overflow Check performance in typical year Check HGL impact in larger storm Look for opportunity to lengthen weir to offset higher HGL Watch out for: Impacts to other outfalls Adverse HGL impacts upstream or downstream Page 6

Example: Hydraulic Relief Start of Outfall Pressure Sewer Existing Regulator To Outfall To Interceptor 12-inch diameter Dry Weather Flow Connection Schematic Plan View Page 7

Example: Hydraulic Relief Ground Surface Crown of Pipe Peak HGL Existing Regulator Pressure Sewer To Outfall Start of Outfall Pressure Sewer Existing Regulator To Outfall To Interceptor 12-inch diameter Dry Weather Flow Connection Schematic Plan View Page 8

Example: Hydraulic Relief Ground Surface Crown of Pipe Peak HGL Existing Regulator Pressure Sewer To Outfall Start of Outfall Pressure Sewer Existing Regulator To Outfall To Interceptor Schematic Plan View Page 9 Proposed Relief of Dry Weather Flow Connection

Example: Hydraulic Relief Existing Regulator with DWF Connection Relief Relief of DWF connection reduced CSOs in typical year BUT: Model predicted adverse HGL impact downstream of relief point during 25-year storm Solution: Provide vortex valve in regulator to limit peak flow through DWF connection Page 1

Example: Hydraulic Relief Overflow to Outfall Influent Combined Sewer Flow to Interceptor Limited by Vortex Valve Example of Regulator with Vortex Valve Page 11

Example: Bending Weirs A common issue: Raising weir provides benefit in small storm, but creates unacceptable increase in upstream HGL in larger storm Solution: Provide bending weir instead of static raised weir John Meunier Grande Water Management Systems Page 12

Example: Pump Station Optimization Proposed Channel Tunnel Dewatering Pump Station (CTDS) Force Main from Channel PS Southeast Lift Station (SELS) Southeast WWTP Bruce Flynn PS (BFS) (Wet Weather Only) Question: Can the existing pump stations be used to optimize the dewatering of the Channel Tunnel? Page 13

Example: Pump Station Optimization SELS HGL CTDS* HGL Flow (mgd) BFS HGL CTDS* 1 mgd 1 9 BFS 9 mgd 6 SELS 6mgd Page 14

Example: Storage Optimization Page 15

Example: Storage Optimization Page 16

Example: Storage Optimization Page 17

Example: Storage Optimization Page 18

Optimization Performance Summary Scorecard Strategy Name: Base North Shore CSD Mission Creek CSD Mariposa, 2th, 22nd CSD Islais Creek CSD Evans, Hudson & Yosemite CSD Sunnydale CSD Brief Narrative: Base case: current operational strategies and Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 544 Volume (MG) 4 Volume (MG) 696 Volume (MG) Volume (MG) existing system configuration. To be used as reference for Count 4 Count 11 Count 9 Count 1 Count Count Operational Overflow Goals: Volume/ North Basin Central Basin South Basin Frequency Results: Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 1244 Volume (MG) Count 4 Count 11 Count Treatment NFP Primary SEP Secondary SEP Primary CSD over baffle CSD through gate Total CSD Control Goals Volumes (MG) 124 526 1366 746 537 1282 Maximize storage in Sunnydale T/S Box Maximize storage in Yosemite T/S Box Islais Creek CSD Storage Evans, Utilization with respect Hudson to Baseline Condition & (%) Yosemite CSD Maximize storage in Islais Creek T/S Box North Shore T/S Channel T/S Islais Creek T/S Yosemite T/S Sunnydale T/S Maximize storage in Channel T/S Box Small Storm Maximize storage in North Shore T/S Box Medium Storm Maximize total flow to SEP Large Storm Maximize secondary flow to 1 SEP Maximize total NPF + SEP volume Improve velocities in NPM 5th and Berry Henry Adams BFS Flooding in LOS Storm (Y/N) Baker and Marina Blvd 17th and Folsom NSS Bluxome and 6th Reduce CSD volume/counts Y Y N Y Y N Y Existing Summary Mariposa, 2th, 22nd CSD Su Volume (MG) 4 Volume (MG) 696 Volume (MG) Volume (MG Count 9 Count Count Count Central Basin Sansome and Union.9 DWF Minimum Velocity (ft/s) 9th and Harrison NPM from 16th and Harrison Mission and 3rd.3..4 1244 Volume (MG) 11 Count NPF NPM NSFM CHS BFS SELS GFS SDS Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Pump WWF to Channel Modify level set points Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible PID off Yosemite T/S level Lower weir on 78" sewer Use rainfall Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Use Islais Creek & Channel T/S levels Use storm characterization Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Raise on/off set points Use rainfall forecast Use storm characterization Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use fourth pump (total at 15 MGD) Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast Use rainfall forecast 1282 Use rainfall forecast (EOS) EOS: Rainfall forecost to determine end of storm Modify channel gates controls Use rainfall forecast SEP Primary CSD over baffle CSD through gate Total CSD 1366 746 537 South Basin UWA Storage Utilization with respect to Baseline Condition (%) Channel T/S NPM Modifications Other Modifications Control Elements CSD Preferential Discharges Passive controls of dropout Re- activate 3" force main Add active gate at Alana Way Prioritize Baker outfall for discharge Active controls of dropout Increased flow capacity at NPF Prioritize Howard/Brannan outfalls for discharge Islais Creek T/S Yosemite T/S Active control at 16th and Harrison NPM Flushing Prioritize Islais Creek N. outfall for discharge Use storm characterization Increased flow capacity at NSFM Prioritize Evans outfall for discharge Use rainfall forecast Prioritize Fitch outfall for discharge Shut 16th St. Gate Rehab NPM with liner N=.9 No Sediment Flooding in LOS Storm (Y/N) Page 19 S

Optimization Performance Summary Scorecard North Shore CSD Mission Creek CSD Mariposa, 2th, 22nd CSD Islais Creek CSD Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 544 Volume (MG) 4 Volume (MG) 69 Count 4 Count 11 Count 9 Count 1 Strategy Name: Base North Shore CSD Mission Creek CSD Mariposa, 2th, 22nd CSD Islais Creek CSD Evans, Hudson & Yosemite CSD Sunnydale CSD Brief Narrative: Base case: current operational strategies and Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 544 Volume (MG) 4 Volume (MG) 696 Volume (MG) Volume (MG) existing system configuration. To be used as reference for Count 4 Count 11 Count 9 Count 1 Count Count Operational Goals: North Basin Central Basin South Basin Results: Volume (MG) Count 37 4 Volume (MG) Count 1244 11 Volume (MG) Count Treatment North Basin Volume Central Basin Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 1244 Count Count 11 Treatment NFP Primary SEP Secondary SEP Primary CSD over baffle CSD through gate Total CSD Control Goals Volumes (MG) 124 526 1366 746 537 1282 Maximize storage in Sunnydale T/S Box Maximize storage Summary in Yosemite T/S Box Storage Utilization with respect to Baseline Condition (%) Maximize storage in Islais Creek T/S Box North Shore T/S Channel T/S Islais Creek T/S Yosemite T/S Sunnydale T/S Maximize storage in Channel T/S Box 4 Small Storm Maximize storage in North Shore T/S Box Medium Storm Maximize total flow to SEP Maximize secondary flow to SEP Maximize total NPF + SEP volume Large Storm Flooding in LOS Storm (Y/N) Improve velocities in NPM 5th and Berry Henry Adams BFS Baker and Marina Blvd 17th and Folsom NSS Bluxome and 6th Reduce CSD volume/counts Y Y N Y Y N Y Treatment NFP Primary SEP Secondary SEP Primary CSD over baffle CSD through gate Volumes (MG) 124 526 1366 746 537 Existing Sansome and Union.9 DWF Minimum Velocity (ft/s) 9th and Harrison NPM from 16th and Harrison Mission and 3rd.3..4 NPF NPM NSFM CHS BFS SELS GFS SDS Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Pump WWF to Channel Modify level set points Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible PID off Yosemite T/S level Lower weir on 78" sewer Use rainfall Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Use Islais Creek & Channel T/S levels Use storm characterization Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Raise on/off set points Use rainfall forecast Use storm characterization Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use fourth pump (total at 15 MGD) Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast Use rainfall forecast Use rainfall forecast (EOS) EOS: Rainfall forecost to determine end of storm Modify channel gates controls Use rainfall forecast Small Storm Medium Storm Large Storm North Shore T/S Storage Utilization with respect to Baseline Co Channel T/S Islais Creek T/S UWA NPM Modifications Other Modifications Control Elements CSD Preferential Discharges Passive controls of dropout Re- activate 3" force main Add active gate at Alana Way Prioritize Baker outfall for discharge Active controls of dropout Increased flow capacity at NPF Prioritize Howard/Brannan outfalls for discharge Active control at 16th and Harrison NPM Flushing Prioritize Islais Creek N. outfall for discharge Use storm characterization Increased flow capacity at NSFM Prioritize Evans outfall for discharge Use rainfall forecast Prioritize Fitch outfall for discharge Shut 16th St. Gate Rehab NPM with Y liner N=.9 Y N No Sediment Flooding in LOS Storm (Y/N) 5th and Berry Henry Adams BFS Baker and Marina Blvd Y Sansome and Union Page 2 9th and Harrison DWF Minimum Velocity (ft/s) NPM from 16th and Harrison

CHS BFS SELS GFS Optimization Performance Summary Scorecard Strategy Name: Base North Shore CSD Mission Creek CSD Mariposa, 2th, 22nd CSD Islais Creek CSD Evans, Hudson & Yosemite CSD Sunnydale CSD Brief Narrative: Base case: current operational strategies and Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 544 Volume (MG) 4 Volume (MG) 696 Volume (MG) Volume (MG) existing system configuration. To be used as reference for Count 4 Count 11 Count 9 Count 1 Count Count Operational Goals: North Basin Central Basin South Basin North Shore CSD Mission Creek CSD Mariposa, 2th, 22nd CSD Islais Creek CSD Results: Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 1244 Volume (MG) Count 4 Count 11 Count Treatment NFP Primary SEP Secondary SEP Primary CSD over baffle CSD through gate Total CSD Control Goals Volumes (MG) 124 526 1366 746 537 1282 Maximize storage in Sunnydale T/S Box Maximize storage in Yosemite T/S Box Storage Utilization with respect to Baseline Condition (%) Maximize storage in Islais Creek T/S Box North Shore T/S Channel T/S Islais Creek T/S Yosemite T/S Sunnydale T/S Maximize storage in Channel T/S Box Small Storm Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 1244 Volume (MG) Maximize storage in North Shore T/S Box Medium Storm Storage Utilization Maximize total Count flow to SEP 4 Count Large Storm 11 Count Maximize secondary Summary flow to SEP Maximize total NPF + SEP volume Flooding in LOS Storm (Y/N) Improve velocities in NPM 5th and Berry Henry Adams BFS Baker and Marina Blvd 17th and Folsom NSS Bluxome and 6th Reduce CSD volume/counts Treatment NFP Primary SEP Secondary Y SEP Primary Y NCSD over baffle Y CSD through Y gate N Total CSD Y Existing UWA Evans, Hudson & Yosemite CSD Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 544 Volume (MG) 4 Volume (MG) 696 Volume (MG) Count 4 Count 11 Count 9 Count 1 Count North Basin Central Basin So Volumes (MG) 124 526 1366 746 537 Small Storm Medium Storm North Shore T/S Sansome and Union.9 DWF Minimum Velocity (ft/s) 9th and Harrison NPM from 16th and Harrison Mission and 3rd.3..4 Storage Utilization with respect to Baseline Condition (%) Channel T/S Islais Creek T/S Yosemite T/S NPF NPM NSFM CHS BFS SELS GFS SDS Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Use rainfall Large forecast Storm (EOS) Pump WWF to Channel Modify level set points Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible PID off Yosemite T/S level Lower weir on 78" sewer Use rainfall Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Use Islais Creek & Channel T/S levels Use storm characterization Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Raise on/off set points Use rainfall forecast Use storm characterization Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use fourth pump (total at 15 MGD) Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast Use rainfall forecast Flooding in LOS Use Storm rainfall forecast (Y/N) (EOS) EOS: Rainfall forecost to determine end of storm Modify channel gates controls Use rainfall forecast 5th and Berry Henry Adams BFS Baker and Marina Blvd 17th and Folsom NSS Y Y N Y Y N NPM Modifications Other Modifications Control Elements CSD Preferential Discharges Passive controls of dropout Re- activate 3" force main Add active gate at Alana Way Prioritize Baker outfall for discharge DWF Minimum Velocity (ft/s) Active controls of dropout Increased flow capacity at NPF Prioritize Howard/Brannan outfalls for discharge Active control Sansome at 16th and Harrison and Union NPM Flushing 9th and Harrison NPM from 16th Prioritize and Harrison Islais Creek N. outfall for discharge Use storm characterization Increased flow capacity at NSFM Prioritize Evans outfall for discharge Use rainfall forecast.9 Prioritize Fitch outfall for discharge Shut 16th St. Gate Rehab NPM with liner N=.9 No Sediment 1282 Mission and 3rd.3..4 Page 21

Optimization Performance Summary Scorecard Strategy Name: Base North Shore CSD Mission Creek CSD Mariposa, 2th, 22nd CSD Islais Creek CSD Evans, Hudson & Yosemite CSD Sunnydale CSD Brief Narrative: Base case: current operational strategies and Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 544 Volume (MG) 4 Volume (MG) 696 Volume (MG) Volume (MG) existing system configuration. To be used as reference for Count 4 Count 11 Count 9 Count 1 Count Count Operational Goals: North Basin Central Basin South Basin Results: Volume (MG) Count 37 4 Volume (MG) Count 1244 11 Volume (MG) Count Treatment NFP Primary SEP Secondary SEP Primary CSD over baffle CSD through gate Total CSD Control Goals Volumes (MG) 124 526 1366 746 537 1282 Maximize storage in Sunnydale T/S Box Maximize storage in Yosemite T/S Box Storage Utilization with respect to Baseline Condition (%) Maximize storage in Islais Creek T/S Box North Shore T/S Channel T/S Islais Creek T/S Yosemite T/S Sunnydale T/S Maximize storage in Channel T/S Box Small Storm Maximize storage in North Shore T/S Box Medium Storm Maximize total flow to SEP Maximize secondary flow to SEP Maximize total NPF + SEP volume Large Storm Flooding in LOS Storm (Y/N) Improve velocities in NPM 5th and Berry Henry Adams BFS Baker and Marina Blvd 17th and Folsom NSS Bluxome and 6th Reduce CSD volume/counts Flooding and Dry Weather Velocity Summaries Y Sansome and Union.9 Y N Y Y N Y DWF Minimum Velocity (ft/s) 9th and Harrison NPM from 16th and Harrison Mission and 3rd.3..4 Existing NPF NPM NSFM CHS BFS SELS GFS SDS Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Pump WWF to Channel Modify level set points Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible PID off Yosemite T/S level Lower weir on 78" sewer Use rainfall Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Use Islais Creek & Channel T/S levels Use storm characterization Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Raise on/off set points Use rainfall forecast Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast Use fourth pump (total at 15 MGD) Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast Use rainfall forecast Use rainfall forecast (EOS) EOS: Rainfall forecost to determine end of storm Modify channel gates controls Use rainfall forecast UWA NPM Modifications Other Modifications Control Elements CSD Preferential Discharges Passive controls of dropout Re- activate 3" force main Add active gate at Alana Way Prioritize Baker outfall for discharge Active controls of dropout Increased flow capacity at NPF Prioritize Howard/Brannan outfalls for discharge Active control at 16th and Harrison NPM Flushing Prioritize Islais Creek N. outfall for discharge Use storm characterization Increased flow capacity at NSFM Prioritize Evans outfall for discharge Use rainfall forecast Prioritize Fitch outfall for discharge Shut 16th St. Gate Rehab NPM with liner N=.9 No Sediment Page 22

Optimization Performance Summary Scorecard Strategy Name: Base North Shore CSD Mission Creek CSD Mariposa, 2th, 22nd CSD Islais Creek CSD Evans, Hudson & Yosemite CSD Sunnydale CSD Brief Narrative: Base case: current operational strategies and Volume (MG) 37 Volume (MG) 544 Volume (MG) 4 Volume (MG) 696 Volume (MG) Volume (MG) existing system configuration. To be used as reference for Count 4 Count 11 Count 9 Count 1 Count Count Operational Goals: North Basin Central Basin South Basin Results: Volume (MG) Count 37 4 Volume (MG) Count 1244 11 Volume (MG) Count Treatment NFP Primary SEP Secondary SEP Primary CSD over baffle CSD through gate Total CSD Control Goals Volumes (MG) 124 526 1366 746 537 1282 Maximize storage in Sunnydale T/S Box Maximize storage in Yosemite T/S Box Storage Utilization with respect to Baseline Condition (%) Maximize storage in Islais Creek T/S Box North Shore T/S Channel T/S Islais Creek T/S Yosemite T/S Sunnydale T/S Maximize storage in Channel T/S Box Small Storm Maximize storage in North Shore T/S Box Medium Storm Maximize total flow to SEP Maximize secondary flow to SEP Maximize total NPF + SEP volume Large Storm Flooding in LOS Storm (Y/N) Improve velocities in NPM 5th and Berry Henry Adams BFS Baker and Marina Blvd 17th and Folsom NSS Bluxome and 6th Reduce CSD volume/counts Y Y N Y Y N Y Sansome and Union.9 DWF Minimum Velocity (ft/s) 9th and Harrison NPM from 16th and Harrison Mission and 3rd.3..4 Existing NPF NPM NSFM CHS BFS SELS GFS SDS Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Existing strategy Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Pump WWF to Channel Modify level set points Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible PID off Yosemite T/S level Lower weir on 78" sewer Use rainfall Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Use Islais Creek & Channel T/S levels Use storm characterization Keep SEP at 25 MGD if possible Raise on/off set points Use rainfall forecast Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast (EOS) Use rainfall forecast Use fourth pump (total at 15 MGD) Use storm characterization Use rainfall forecast Use rainfall forecast Use rainfall forecast (EOS) EOS: Rainfall forecost to determine end of storm Modify channel gates controls Use rainfall forecast UWA NPM Modifications Other Modifications Control Elements CSD Preferential Discharges Passive controls of dropout Re- activate 3" force main Add active gate at Alana Way Prioritize Baker outfall for discharge Active controls of dropout Increased flow capacity at NPF Prioritize Howard/Brannan outfalls for discharge Active control at 16th and Harrison NPM Flushing Prioritize Islais Creek N. outfall for discharge Use storm characterization Increased flow capacity at NSFM Prioritize Evans outfall for discharge Use rainfall forecast Prioritize Fitch outfall for discharge Shut 16th St. Gate Rehab NPM with liner N=.9 No Sediment Alternative combinations Page 23

Summary System Characterization provides understanding and tools to conduct optimization evaluations Use modeling tools to identify and evaluate alternatives Watch out for potential adverse impacts Develop output format to facilitate comparison of alternatives Page 24

Thank You Donald.walker@aecom.com May 14, 215