Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy



Similar documents
Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

Water Quality and Water Usage Surveys

Report for 2003PA14B: Spruce Creek Watershed Keystone Project

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

The Eight Tools of Watershed Protection. Tom Schueler Center for Watershed Protection EPA Webcast

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Executive Summary Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

Nipigon Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Leveraging Ohio s Clean Water SRF Program to Fund Stream and Wetland Restoration and Protection Projects

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

WATER QUALITY MODELING TO SUPPORT THE ROUGE RIVER RESTORATION

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Standards: Human activity has consequences on living organisms and ecosystems. (94412, )

Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Emphasis on Groundwater May 4, 2004

Multi-purpose Drainage Management (MDM) Plans

7.0 Stream Restoration

The Everglades & Northern Estuaries; St. Lucie River Estuary, Indian River Lagoon & Caloosahatchee Estuary. Water Flows & Current Issues

North Branch Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Rocky EEP Preliminary Findings Report Summary February 2005

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

MiCorps 101. Presented by Paul Steen. MiCorps Program Manager

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

13. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/ RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Year Post Restoration Monitoring Summary Rock Creek Project Monitoring and Analysis conducted by Bio-Surveys,LLC. Contact: strask@casco.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

Water Security Agency. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Skaguay Reservoir. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Greg A. Policky - Aquatic Biologist (Salida) greg.policky@state.co.

Natural Resource-Based Planning*

WATER: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Syllabus

Wetland Vocabulary Organizer

Penticton Creek May 4, 2015 Council Meeting

EPA Trends for wastewater Treatment in California

Watershed Education for Teachers. Cinde Thomas-Jimenez Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority

Agua Hedionda Creek Flood Plain Information; Department of Army, Los Angeles District,

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Chapter 9. Selected Watershed Initiatives in the Great Basin Region

Tennessee Watershed Modeling Tools. Southern Region Watershed Meeting, July Forbes Walker University of Tennessee Extension

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

The Economics of Culvert Replacement: Fish Passage in Eastern Maine

URBAN STORMWATER GUIDELINES AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR PROTECTION OF FISH AND FISH HABITAT DRAFT DISCUSSION DOCUMENT

FOUR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT

Phosphorus. Phosphorus Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management.

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

MAPPING MINNEAPOLIS URBAN TREE CANOPY. Why is Tree Canopy Important? Project Background. Mapping Minneapolis Urban Tree Canopy.

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

DISTRICT VALUES STATEMENTS, GOALS, ACTION ITEMS, AND ONGOING TASKS FOR 2015 Adopted by the Board of Directors December 10, Values Statements.

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Restoring and protecting natural floodplains reduces flood losses and benefits the environment. Photo: USDA NRCS.

Oxbow Restoration for Fish Habitat and Water Quality

Aquatic Biomes, Continued

Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project

How do you treat water based on water quality from different water sources?

Transcription:

Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Leech Lake River Watershed - Update October 28, 2014 Phil Votruba Watershed Division

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency July2007MuskyLeechLake.jpg.lnk IMG_2716.jpg.lnk 2

National Treasure Glacier National Park (August 2014)

First a Look into the Past! This picture is of a sewer in downtown Minneapolis in 1927: Over 1.5 million gallons of sewage and runoff and other waste, on average, per day, going to the Mississippi River to go away. How would you like to live downstream of this! Picture of early 19 th century Logging in Northern MN. 4

Federal Clean Water Act 72 Goal Fishable/Swimmable by 1983 Framework to protect and restore WQ Water quality standards are established to protect: Aquatic life Recreation and Consumption

Briggs Lake Sherburne County September 2014 Federal Clean Water Act 72 Goal Fishable/Swimmable by 1983 Framework to protect and restore WQ Water quality standards are established to protect: Aquatic life Recreation and Consumption

Briggs Lake Sherburne County September 2014 7

Ten Mile Lake 8

Beneficial Uses

Beneficial Use Classifications Use Class Beneficial Use Class 1 Class 2 2A 2Bd 2B 2C 2D Class 3 Class 4A Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 Drinking Water Aquatic life and recreation Cold water fisheries, trout waters Cool and warm water fisheries, drinking water Cool and warm water fisheries Indigenous fish and associated aquatic community Wetlands Industrial uses and cooling Agriculture and wildlife uses Aesthetics and navigation Other uses Limited resource value waters

Ecoregions of Minnesota

12

The 10 Year Cycle Monitoring and Assessment Condition monitoring Effectiveness monitoring Every 10 Years Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy TMDL Protection Strategy Implementation Plans Implementation Activities BMPs Permits Etc. 13

Map of Minnesota s Basins Upper Mississippi River Basin

Leech Lake watershed designated one of nationally recognized 10 'Water to Watch' By Denton (Denny) Newman Jr. on Jun 21, 2013 at 9:04 p.m. The National Fish Habitat Partnership (NFHP) has designated Leech Lake watershed as one of the nationally recognized 10 Waters to Watch, for 2013, according to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

Watershed Facts Approximately 277 Total River Miles, 750 Lakes (170,000 + total open water acres) ½ of MN Natural Muskie Habitat, ¼ of U.S. Natural Muskie Habitat 44% Forest, 24% Wetland, 20% Open Water, 12 % (grassland, shrubs, residential, urban, row crops) 16

Surface Water Assessment Grants Priority Sites 10x Stream sites (water chemistry) lakes 100-499 acres (water chemistry) Goal Combine local resources with state resources to enhance monitoring capacity. (SWAG) 2012-2013 SWAG Lakes (16) funding through Cass County (Partners LLBO, Hubbard SWCD, HSC) County Lake Name Lake ID Cass Boss 11-0382-00 Hubbard Horseshoe 29-0059-00 Cass Howard 11-0472-00 Cass Hunter 11-0170-00 Cass Kego 11-0182-00 Cass Knight 11-0087-00 Cass Larson 11-0374-00 Cass Little Bass 11-0063-00 Cass Paquet 11-0381-00 Cass Portage 11-0490-00 Cass West Twin 11-0125-00 Cass Twin 11-0484-00 Cass Thirteen 11-0488-00 Cass Lower Sucker 11-0313-00 Cass Portage 11-0204-00 Cass Six Mile 11-0146-00

MPCA Water Quality Monitoring 2012-2013 MPCA Priority Sites 100 lakes/year with a heavy emphasis on lakes >500 acres A percentage of lakes 10-499 acres All 10x stream sites not picked up by grantees Goal Ensure monitoring of lakes most heavily used for recreation Ensure Stream chemistry data is available to support biological assessments 12 lakes to be monitored by MPCA in the LLRW. 11-0387-00 Little Webb 07010102 CASS 11-0475-00 Gadbolt 07010102 CASS 11-0482-00 May 07010102 CASS 29-0048-00 Benedict 07010102 HUBBARD 29-0061-00 Garfield 07010102 HUBBARD 29-0063-00 Hart 07010102 HUBBARD 29-0130-00 Twenty-One 07010102 HUBBARD 29-0131-00 Nelson 07010102 HUBBARD 29-0132-00 Bass 07010102 HUBBARD 29-0224-00 McCarty 07010102 HUBBARD 11-0120-01 INGUADONA (N. BAY) 07010102 CASS 11-0129-00 Lower Trelipe 07010102 CASS

Leech Lake River Watershed Stressor Identification August 27, 2014 Kevin Stroom MPCA - Brainerd

Stream Impairments Two stream biological impairments (Spring Cr., Northby Cr.) Both are likely due to natural causes Natural Background Committee Review Low Dissolved Oxygen in many locations Low gradient streams Wetland riparian conditions Little shading

Strong wetland influence Necktie River at Cty Hwy 39

Spring Creek A small stream flowing into the south side of Wabedo Lake. 49 beaver dams above the sample site (some breached) Low DO at every visit (4). Macroinvertebrate impairment - no sensitive species, probably due to low DO.

Spring Creek Perched culvert at Cty Hwy 47 Another wetland-dominated riparian corridor

Boy River May be some DO impairments, but it will depend on data interpretation during the official assessment effort this fall.

Stream Monitoring Conclusion Overall, the biological communities are healthy! Just a couple biological impairments, which are likely due to natural causes. Official assessment happens this fall (November 2014). A nice Boy River walleye!

Lakes Not Meeting Current Water Quality Standards Based on Pre-Assessment Data TPμg/L 30 Chlorophyll-a μg/l 9 Secchi disk transparencn ot less than 2.0 m

IIIioiiijkjjjjjj (Long-term Monitoring data) Improving Mule, Blackwater, Ten Mile & Baby Declining Inguadona, Ponto, Stony 28

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016-21 Pre- Planning Leech Lake River Watershed WRAPS Timeline Biological Monitoring Lake & Stream Monitoring Flow Monitoring Reviewing data, preparing assessments Nov 2014, WAT Dec 2014, PJG Jan 2015 Pre-Mod. Modeling Stressor ID & Priority Management Zones Citizen Engagement Final Reports TMDLs & Protection Plans Implementation

Leech Lake River WRAPS Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Project Updates WRAPS project started (December 2011) Intensive Watershed Monitoring 2012-2013 Developed Strategic Plan for Civic Engagement component of project. CE is a continued effort throughout project Several CE team and Stakeholder meetings held for WRAPS since 12/2011. Watershed kickoff event held at the Hope Lutheran Church in Walker (May 2012) Second WRAPS to have a NEMO/NERO session. A few impairments (other than mercury) exist in the watershed 4 Lakes (Nutrients Natural background?) Hart (208 acres), Twin (162 acres), Blueberry (23 acres) and McCarthey (148 acres) 2 Stream reaches (Biological Impairments Natural Background?) 2 Stream reaches -Two stream biological impairments (Spring Creek, Northby Creek). Both are likely due to natural causes. Conducted field work this past summer to support IWM efforts and to gather information for natural Background determinations. (Stressor ID) HSPF Modeling scenario development.

What s Next? Prioritization Planning for watershed (Zonation Modeling) Zonation Survey Watershed Assessment process to begin- based on Existing data and data gathered in 2012-2013 (Starting in November 2014, PJG Jan 2015) Continued Stakeholder Involvement and Public Participation (CE Strategic Plan) Start Phase III of WRAPS project (Final Phase) Writing of the WRAPS and TMDLs (if necessary). Includes development of Implementation Table Monitoring and Assessment & Stressor ID reports (Spring 2015) Continuation of Watershed HSPF modeling process (HSPF modeling finished summer 2015)

Hydrologic Simulation program FORTRAN (HSPF Scenarios) A good tool for the toolbox 32

Land Use Classification

Average Simulated Total Phosphorus Concentration by Subwatershed based on land use and land cover

Potential Threats to the Watershed and its Water Quality

Potential Threats to the Watershed and its Water Quality (continued) 36

Potential Threats to the Watershed and its Water Quality (continued) Cass Lake now added to AIS list September 2014 Little Rock Lake Benton County (2008) 37

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency We Protect What we Love - Jacques Cousteau Photo: Explore Minnesota Tourism