Rocky EEP Preliminary Findings Report Summary February 2005
|
|
|
- Stewart Baldwin
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 This is a DRAFT summary of the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Upper Rocky River Local Watershed Plan Preliminary Findings Report. The original, 157 page document can be found here: The summary was produced in 2010 by NCSU student Robert Monk. Rocky EEP Preliminary Findings Report Summary February Introduction The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has initiated comprehensive watershed planning efforts in certain high priority local watersheds. NCEEP selected the Upper Rocky River watersheds (which includes Tick Creek) as high priority areas for planning due to two primary factors: (1) documented water quality and aquatic habitat problems in selected stream segments, and (2) ongoing threats to local watershed health which may be attributed to impacts from urban/suburban development, clearing of riparian buffers, agricultural activities and or other nonpoint sources. 2 Physical Features The Rocky River LWP study area is a part of the upper Cape Fear River Basin encompassing three 14 digit hydrologic units at about 177 square miles. The three hydrologic units are the Upper Rocky River, the Middle Rocky River, and Bear Creek. The study area comprises a portion of the upper Rocky River main stem and the following watersheds: North Prong Rocky River, Greenbrier Creek, Nick Creek, Loves Creek, Varnell Creek, Meadow Creek, Tick Creek, and Bear Creek. The study area skips the Rocky River mainstem between Tick and Bear Creeks. The Rocky River watershed study area originates in Randolph and Alamance Counties, running south southwest through western Chatham County. Approximately 90 percent of the study area is located in western Chatham County. Two impoundments located along the Rocky River within the LWP study area serve as the drinking water supply for Siler City and some surrounding communities. Public access to the lake is restricted. The Rocky River Reservoir is located approximately four miles due north of Siler City. Storage capacity was increased in 1988 to 424 million gallons, an increase from 60 million gallons. The enlargement raised the water level by 10 feet. Siler City is currently undertaking efforts to expand the capacity of the lower reservoir. The Rocky River study area lies within the Carolina Slate Belt and is typically characterized by well drained, moderately permeable soils.. About 65 percent of the entire study area is classified as forest and wetland, about 2.5 percent is developed or disturbed, 31 percent is in agricultural uses, and 1 percent is open water. Page 1 of 6
2 3 Preliminary Functional Assessment Stream segments in the headwater areas of the Rocky River are classified as Water Supply 3 (WS 3), indicating waters protected as water supplies within low to moderately developed areas. The best use of these waters is defined as a source of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes for those users where a more protective WS I and WS 2 classification is not feasible and any other best usage specified for Class C waters. All remaining perennial stream segments in the study area are Class C waters. The best of use of Class C waters should support aquatic life propagation and maintenance of biological integrity. Class C is the minimum designation standard for all freshwaters in North Carolina. Several stream segments including the main stem of the Rocky River from its source to the Rocky River Reservoir and the entire length of Love s Creek as well as Tick Creek. The Rocky River Reservoir watershed is primarily agricultural with some pasture immediately adjacent to the lake. The lake was sampled by the division of water quality during the summer of 2003 and found to have nutrient enrichment characterized by nuisance algal blooms. Benthic macro invertebrate samples have been collected from two main stem Rocky River Locations and three tributaries, Loves Creek, Tick Creek, and Bear Creek. There are five sampling sites on Loves Creek and one on a tributary, two sites on Tick Creek and three on Bear Creek. Both Tick Creek stations received Good Fair ratings from their most recent sampling event, and the habitat score at the SR 2120 station reflected adequate benthic habitat quality. Tick Creek had a decline in fish diversity from Excellent in 1994 to Fair in Bioclassifications and habitat scores for the Loves Creek watershed are generally poor when compared to the remainder of the study area. Of the 13 sites surveyed for bioclassifications, Loves Creek and Tick Creek were the only sites with any historically poor classifications. Loves Creek and Tick Creek also had the lowest habitat scores in the study area. Severe bank erosion and bank trampling from cattle were evident in Tick Creek. There is limited water quality data available within the study area. Due to the limited number of water quality monitoring sites in the study area, future sampling is necessary. 4 Assessment Information Land Use The most recent Land Cover Database indentifies two classes of residential land, low intensity and high intensity. In low intensity, constructed materials account for 30 to 80% of the total area while high intensity areas are covered % constructed materials. Office/light industrial and commercial/heavy industrial land use make up about 2 percent of the Rocky River Watershed. Agricultural areas including cropland, pasture, Page 2 of 6
3 and hay land make up approximately 30 percent of the study area. The poultry and cattle population for Chatham County was estimated at 7 million birds and 16,000 to 17,000 head of cattle and manure from these animals supplies fertilizer in excess of agricultural needs with the exception of nitrogen which is a cause of pollution. About 82 percent of agronomic needs are supplied by manure. Pollutant loading from cow manure is particularly problematic when cattle feeding areas are located adjacent to riparian areas. Overgrazing near or adjacent to streams increases sediment loads. Cattle trampling may compact soils and further decrease runoff infiltration rates. Croplands have been identified in previous studies as having high potential for producing large sediment and nutrient loads to areas streams. Sub watersheds with the highest nutrient loading rates are seen in the headwater areas of the Rocky River, Loves Creek, Johnson Creek, Mud Lick Creek, Varnell Creek, Tick Creek, and some areas of Bear Creek. Preliminary results indicate high percentages of buffer disturbance in urban areas and agricultural areas. Streams near Siler City and in high agricultural areas showed the highest levels of disturbance. Buffer disturbances are commonly associated with lawn maintenance, cattle access to streams, farming operations and construction activities. The percent of vegetated wetlands in the riparian buffer ranged from 0 to 100 percent, with a mean of 56 percent. Within the Rocky River study area, the North Carolina Natural Heritage program has designated six sites as significant natural heritage areas. Three significant natural heritage areas lie outside the study area but are aquatic habitats and thus affected by preservation activities within the study area. They are the Upper Rocky River Aquatic Habitat, Rocky River Basalt Bluffs and Levees, Wood s Mill Bend, 902 Laurel Bluffs and Mussel Beds, Bear Creek Aquatic Habitat, Lower Rocky River/Lower Deep River Aquatic Habitat, Rocky River Dragonfly Riffles, Donnelly Hardpan Bog, and Old Railroad Heath Glades. The sub watersheds in the headwaters of Bear Creek received the highest total score for quality of terrestrial habitat and potential for preservation sites. 5 Summary of Land Use Planning The Rocky River Local Watershed Protection (LWP) study area comprises six local government jurisdictions: Chatham County (63.20 percent); Siler City (25.62 percent); Randolph County (4.67 percent); Liberty (1.08 percent); Staley (0.40 percent); and Alamance County (5.03 percent). Chatham County has two distinct planning areas in the Rocky River watershed: the water supply protection area north of the water supply intake extending to the county line (34.44 sq. mi.) and the unincorporated area to the north and south of the Siler City extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and extending to the LWP study area boundary (82.89 sq. mi.). Within a 2,500 foot corridor along the Rocky River, residential development is limited to one house Page 3 of 6
4 per 5 acres. Chatham County s vision for these planning areas is to maintain rural and agricultural land uses. The Chatham County land use development plan defines rural as 1 to 5 acres per house. Fifty percent of the development tract is preserved in open space. The Siler City ETJ area is currently un zoned except for the river corridor however; the Town of Siler City land development plan provides a vision for the area. General Residential development (2 to 4 units per acre) is planned for the areas south, west, and north of the city limits. Major industrial and mixed use development is planned along the old highway 421 and new highway 421 corridors, north and east of the existing city limits. Rural and agricultural land uses are planned for the northern portion and the southern half of the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. This area is projected to be low density development with no public water and sewer service provided in the future. Siler City has very protective river and stream buffer requirements: within a 2,500 foot corridor along the Rocky River, 200 foot buffers are required along perennial and intermittent streams. Outside this corridor, 100 foot and 50 foot buffers are required along perennial and intermittent streams. Randolph County and its incorporated towns of Liberty and Staley are in the northwestern headwaters of the LWP study area. The area is characterized by farmland and low intensity urban development. In Low Density Development, single family residential development is limited to two houses per acre or 24 percent built upon area for all other residential and nonresidential development. In High Density Development, residential and nonresidential development cannot exceed 50 percent built upon area, development must control the runoff from the first 1 inch of rainfall, ten percent of the jurisdiction may develop up to 70 percent built upon area without storm water controls, and a 100 foot buffer is required for all development exceeding the low density requirements. The Randolph County Growth Management Plan 2002 shows the Town of Liberty more than doubling its municipal area in the coming years. Alamance County s jurisdiction in the Rocky River watershed is predominately farmland (crops and hay/pastures). Unless the existing regulations are significantly strengthened, a number of high quality (total score of 9 to 11), and very high quality (total scores greater than 11), habitat areas are threatened in Rocky River s planned rural areas. Most of the streams and watersheds in Chatham County s water supply watershed zone have medium to high erosion risk factors. If current zoning continues, or if the housing density in the agricultural and rural district averages 2 acres or less per lot, significant stream erosion is likely to occur. The Tick Creek watershed south of Siler City has medium to high erosion risk factors. The envisioned agricultural district in these sub watersheds would need to average 3 to 5 acre lots or clustered residential design to mitigate potential erosion impacts. For the most part, the Page 4 of 6
5 streams with medium to high risk of erosion are in the developed portion of Siler City. The North Prong Rocky River and Greenbrier Creek have medium risk factors for erosion. Half acre lots would pose a significant threat of erosion in these sub watersheds. The Rocky River and North Prong Rocky River are in the planned primary growth area, which will include high density, mixed use urban development. Such development could cause significant erosion in the headwaters of the Rocky River watershed. Farms that are preserved and maintained in the future should be encouraged to use best management practices to the maximum extent possible: As agricultural land is converted to forest land or developed land in the future, reduction in sediment delivery to the stream system will take place due to the decrease in disturbed soils from agricultural practices. Those sub watersheds with excessive sediment loading also have streams with medium to high erosion risk factors. Land disturbed for development, road building, utilities, will need added attention to sedimentation and erosion controls and enforcement. Tetra Tech estimated existing phosphorus loading in the Rocky River sub watersheds based on the potential for septic tank loading, farmland runoff, urban runoff, and soil erosion. Many sub watersheds in the southern half of the Rocky River watershed are still primarily forested. 6 Prioritizing Functional Stressors and Areas for Detailed Assessment Agricultural management practices appear to be the most widespread cause of watershed function degradation, although the magnitude of urban stressors and potential of future urbanization around Siler City is expected to make urban sources of water quality stressors increasingly important over time. The greatest threats to existing watershed functions appear to be occurring in the Upper Rocky River area, associated with intensive agricultural activities including cropland and pasture with extensive land application of manure and pervasive lack of sufficient riparian buffers. Upland runoff is influenced by a variety of land management practices including cropland and pasture management in rural areas and creation of impervious surfaces in urban settings. Nutrient concentrations have not been identified as a significant threat to the health of flowing streams within the study area. Based on the results of the scoring analysis, the sub watersheds with the highest stress levels are central Siler City, Lower Loves Creek, Middle Tick Creek, Rocky River Headwaters, Liberty South, Middle North Prong, and Johnson Creek. The majority of the degraded sub watersheds are located in the upper portions of the study area. Only three Bear Creek HU sub watersheds were determined to be functionally deficient, primarily due to nutrient loading concerns. Agricultural activities are generally the primary sources of the stressors. MR12 and MR18 in the Middle Rocky River HU had good priority scores as well, with high percentages of forest cover and wetland content. Sub watersheds UR08, UR11, UR13, MR10, and MR20 had the next highest priority scores with associated potential functional benefits. Page 5 of 6
6 7 Indicators and Assessment Tools Agricultural Practices that affect sediment and nutrient loadings also have a secondary affect on bacteria reduction. For rural areas, agricultural BMPs will be recommended on a watershed scale, providing general information regarding practices that could alleviate excessive nutrient and sediment loadings to local streams. 8 Additional Data Needs The primary water quality issue is sediment loading from both upland and stream bank erosion. Both sediment sources are linked to agriculture and pasture management issues. Urban areas contribute to stream bank erosion due to increased flows. Nutrient loading to area streams is an issue of concern in areas receiving land application of chicken manure and in areas where cattle directly deposit manure onto pastures and into stream channels. Fecal coliform bacteria loading from both chicken and cattle manure is a third issue of concern. Water quality issues related to residential and urban land uses are to be examined in several small watersheds in the middle portions of the study area, particularly around Siler City. There is a water quality monitoring station on Bear Creek with monthly ambient sampling wand storm peak samples. Page 6 of 6
Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC
Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC 3 Lakes, Reservoirs, and Ponds Forty-six states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia (collectively referred to as states in the rest of this
How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance
Regulatory Alternatives to Address Stormwater Management and Flooding in the Marlboro Street Study Area Alternative 1: Amend Existing Local Regulations This proposed alternative provides an incremental
Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002
Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed Summary Report 2002 DOE/BP-00005268-5 November 2002 This Document should be cited as follows: "Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1 ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4.2 GOALS AND POLICIES 4.2.A General Goals and Policies 1 4.2.B
How To Plan A Buffer Zone
Backyard Buffers Protecting Habitat and Water Quality What is a buffer? A buffer (also called a riparian buffer area or zone) is the strip of natural vegetation along the bank of a stream, lake or other
1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria
1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria 1.7.1 Introduction These guidelines set out standards for evaluating and processing proposed modifications of the 100- year floodplain with the following objectives:
7.0 Stream Restoration
7.0 Stream Restoration 7.1 Issue Statements One of the primary concerns of residents in the Bassett Creek watershed is the maintenance of the natural beauty of the creek in residential and recreational
Phosphorus. Phosphorus Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management. www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/nonpoint/phosphorus/phosphorusban.html
Phosphorus Phosphorus Brochure Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management Reducing Phosphorus Website Washington State Department of Ecology www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/nonpoint/phosphorus/phosphorusban.html Nutrients
Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1
Strategy Name: Reduce Existing Potential for Flood Damages LRSW-S3C1. Develop and implement a program to: Minimize flood damages through the use of structural measures. Minimize flood damages through the
Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters
Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters Jim Lester, PhD. and Lisa Gonzalez Houston Advanced Research Center Galveston
4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets
4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets 4.1 Environmental Impacts Significant additional development in the Alder Creek watershed is not anticipated at this time; however, there are
Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:
CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN Adopted 9/23/98 PART 1: GOALS. POLICY. COVERAGE. A. Goals The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are: 1. Preservation and protection
4. Priority Areas of Conservation
4. Priority Areas of Conservation A. SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE AREAS This Open Space and Farmland Plan identifies the key issues facing open space and agricultural resources in the Town, highlights the location
Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy [email protected]
Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy [email protected] Wetland study slide Water Quality NRE goals in watershed plans Protect habitat that remains.
4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed
Buena Vista Creek Watershed 4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed Watershed Overview The Buena Vista Creek Watershed is the fourth-largest system within the Carlsbad Hydrologic Unit. The watershed extends approximately
Integrated Restoration Prioritization
Integrated Restoration Prioritization Habitat Restoration and Environmental Monitoring Projects Section Restoration Services Division Definition Restoration Prioritization is a process of combining various
Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Background Located in southwestern Pennsylvania, Crooked Creek is a major tributary of the Allegheny River, entering near Ford City in Armstrong County. It is rich in natural
LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION
LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION LILAC MANUAL LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 3 General Eligibility... 4 Specific Eligibility Criteria
Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington
Viewed broadly, the concept of ecosystem services describes the many resources and services provided by nature. Typically, traditional planning and development practices do not adequately represent the
3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;
QIN Shoreline Master Program Project Summary The Shoreline Master Program (SMP) development process for the Quinault Indian Nation (QIN) includes the completion of inventory and analysis report with corresponding
Water Quality and Water Usage Surveys
Appendix 1 Water Quality and Water Usage Surveys This appendix contains copies of the Water Quality Survey and the Lake Usage Survey that we used to complete the watershedbased community assessments. We
Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality Wetlands are a significant component of Michigan s landscape, covering roughly 5.5 million acres, or 15 percent of the land area of the state. This represents about
Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets
SUPPORTING INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE ALLOCATION PRIORITIES FOR CLEAN WATER FUND BOARD Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets 1 Agriculture AAFM On-Farm Implementation
Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization
Introduction A visual examination of Doolittle Creek in a highly developed suburban county in Georgia yielded telltale signs of a creek whose original streambed had been altered. Examination of official
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION Background California State Law requires each county to adopt a General Plan for the physical development of the county and any land outside its boundaries which bears relation
Ginger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University
Effective Water Quality BMP Monitoring Tools Ginger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University Overview BMP Monitoring Guidance Document for Stream Systems Lessons learned CEAP
Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT
UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs 10 Year Plan Update UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update Page A 1 UMRWD LIST OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS Since its inception in 1967, the
Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013
Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013 1. Design alternatives for large capital flood projects (basinlevel water retention and Interstate
Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting down businesses, harming the environment
Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Value to Individuals and Communities Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting
DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER
DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER 9 levees and revetments / Approximately 1.1 miles of river bank are armored Revetments provide limited, localized erosion protection, but impact habitat Frequent and costly
Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016
Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016 James L. McIntire Washington State Treasurer Summary The State of Washington offered green bonds to investors in September 2015, with approximately
Chapter 9. Selected Watershed Initiatives in the Great Basin Region
Chapter 9 Selected Watershed Initiatives in the Great Basin Region The Great Basin contains vast areas of sparsely populated desert lands. Lacking an ocean drainage, the Great Basin is a hydrologic sink
MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOREWORD This document contains the basis for NOAA and EPA s decision to fully approve Massachusetts Coastal Nonpoint
A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development
A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development Environmental Protection What is a watershed? It does not matter how far away you build from a creek, lake, or the ocean, you are in a watershed. Another
Retention/Irrigation. Design Considerations. Soil for Infiltration Area Required Slope Environmental Side-effects
Description Retention/irrigation refers to the capture of stormwater runoff in a holding pond and subsequent use of the captured volume for irrigation of landscape of natural pervious areas. This technology
Hawlings River Watershed Restoration Action Plan December 2003
Hawlings River Watershed Restoration Action Plan December 2003 MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Montgomery County s Water Quality Goals Montgomery County has a rich and diverse
Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study
Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study Jeffrey Zuercher Project Manager Chicago District February 19, 2014 Study Partnership: US Army Corps of Engineers Agenda Background Study
STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208
STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208 RANGELAND HEALTH STANDARDS - ASSESSMENT SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208 STANDARD 1 - UPLAND WATERSHED This standard is being met on the allotment.
Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised
Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised NC Association of Environmental Professionals June 9, 2011 Background Purposes Update rules due to required changes from statutes Put all
1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk
1 Introduction 1.1 Key objective The aim of this study is to identify and assess possible options for improving the quality of the river channel and habitats in the River South Esk catchment whilst helping
LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN
1 AUGUST 2011 LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN: 1. Replace the existing unsafe Ragged Mountain dam with a new dam and raise the reservoir pool level initially
Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank
Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank Black Creek Pioneer Village, South Theatre 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Habitat Restoration and Environmental Monitoring Projects Section Restoration
Chapter 5.0. Stormwater Credits for Innovative Site Planning
Chapter 5.0 Stormwater Credits for Innovative Site Planning Chapter 5. Stormwater Credits...Introduction 5.0 Stormwater Credits In Maryland, there are many programs at both the State and local level that
Water Quality Management
Water Quality Management Sustainable agriculture practices detailed in other sections of this publication are important ways to maintain or improve water quality on the farm and downstream from the farm.
Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity
Sustainability Brief: and Watershed Integrity New Jersey depends on water resources for the health of our people, the strength of our economy, and the vitality of our ecosystems. The quality of our water
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
p-ear2-88b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED JOE AND CHRIS WIENEKE FARMS PROJECT LISMORE
Ouachita River Floodplain Restoration Upper Ouachita NWR, Louisiana
Ouachita River Floodplain Restoration Upper Ouachita NWR, Louisiana Interior Hydrologic Restoration Plan Mollicy Farms Unit The Nature Conservancy Louisiana Field Office 2011 Cover: Sediment laden water
GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold
CHAPTER 11 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Active Channel The channel that contains the discharge Leopold where channel maintenance is most effective, sediment are actively transported and deposited, and that are capable
Chapter 14 Quiz. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
Chapter 14 Quiz Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. Which of the following is NOT true regarding the Chesapeake Bay? a. it is one of many small
Executive Summary Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy
Executive Summary The (NRS) will guide the state in reducing excess nutrients in waters so that in-state and downstream water quality goals are ultimately met. Nutrient impacts are widespread. Excessive
5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology
I-70 East Final EIS 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology This section discusses floodplain and drainage/hydrology resources and explains why they are important
Phosphorus inputs to Lough Neagh. The increasing impact of agriculture
Phosphorus inputs to Lough Neagh. The increasing impact of agriculture Table of contents Introduction Why does phosphorus create water quality problems? An algal bloom Eutrophication and phosphorus How
Low Impact Development Checklist
New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual February 2004 A P P E N D I X A Low Impact Development Checklist A checklist for identifying nonstructural stormwater management strategies incorporated
The Eight Tools of Watershed Protection. Tom Schueler Center for Watershed Protection EPA Webcast
The Eight Tools of Watershed Protection Tom Schueler Center for Watershed Protection EPA Webcast 1 About the Center for Watershed Protection Non-profit 501(c)3, non-advocacy organization Work with watershed
Increasing water availability through juniper control.
Tim Deboodt, OSU Crook County Extension Agent 498 SE Lynn Blvd. Prineville, OR 97754 541-447-6228 [email protected] Increasing water availability through juniper control. Throughout the region
Ponds- Planning, Design, Construction
United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Agriculture Handbook Number 590 Ponds- Planning, Design, Construction This handbook describes the requirements for building a pond. It
1 (15 A NCAC 02B.0280) (2006) 2011 A
Initial Assessment of Agricultural Operations Stage 1 Reductions Falls Reservoir Water Supply Nutrient Strategy: Agriculture (15 A NCAC 02B.0280) For the Baseline Period (2006) through Crop Year 2011 A
Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey
Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program Christopher C. Obropta, Ph.D., P.E. Email: [email protected]
Welcome to the Understanding Dissolved Oxygen learning module. This section provides information on the following topics:
Introduction Welcome to the learning module. This section provides information on the following topics: How dissolved oxygen is defined and measured in numbers Why dissolved oxygen is important Natural
Agua Hedionda Creek Flood Plain Information; Department of Army, Los Angeles District,
Bibliography Agua Hedionda Creek Flood Plain Information; Department of Army, Los Angeles District, California and Maps. US Army Corps of Engineers July 1973 pg. 24 Aqua Hedionda Lagoon Foundation Framework
Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design
Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design 2015 Symposium on Restoration in a Contaminated Environment: Lessons Learned and Challenges in Moving Forward Part II April 2015 Karin Boyd Applied Geomorphology,
Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents
Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents Chapter 10. Selecting Metrics or Indicators of WQS Attainment... 10-2 Chapter 11. Monitoring
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 22-01. JCSA Groundwater Treatment Facility Staff Report for the November 5, 2001, Planning Commission Public Hearing
SPECIAL USE PERMIT 22-01. JCSA Groundwater Treatment Facility Staff Report for the November 5, 2001, Planning Commission Public Hearing This report is prepared by the James City County Planning Division
NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM
Planning, Building, and Environmental Services NAPA VALLEY GROWTH NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM Plunging Forward May 15, 2015 1 YOU CAN T CROSS THE SEA MERELY BY STANDING AND STARING AT THE WATER. Rabindranath
Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department
Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist Walworth County Land Conservation Department The following checklist is designed to assist the applicant in complying with the Walworth
How do you treat water based on water quality from different water sources?
How do you treat water based on water quality from different water sources? Why? Authors: Wendy Lane and Kim Sciarrone Seattle Public Schools; Seattle, WA Water from different sources will contain different
South Fork Rivanna Reservoir and Watershed. Reflecting on 36 Years, Anticipating 50 years EXPANDED SUMMARY. Stephen P. Bowler Watershed Manager
South Fork Rivanna Reservoir and Watershed Reflecting on 36 Years, Anticipating 50 years EXPANDED SUMMARY Stephen P. Bowler Watershed Manager Prepared for Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Albemarle County
Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC
Addendum D Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC Moody Wash ACEC is hereby nominated by Citizens for Dixie s Future to: BLM St. George Field Office 345 East Riverside Drive St. George, UT 84790 Moody Wash is a
IMPROVING SOUTH FORK PEACHTREE CREEK WATERSHED USING THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA
IMPROVING SOUTH FORK PEACHTREE CREEK WATERSHED USING THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA David Chastant AUTHORS:DeKalb County, 330 West Ponce De Leon Ave, Decatur, Georgia 30030 REFERENCE:Proceedings
CHAPTER 62-624 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS
CHAPTER 62-624 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS 62-624.100 Policy and Purpose. 62-624.200 Definitions. 62-624.300 General Provisions. 62-624.310 General Conditions, Individual Permits. 62-624.400
Watershed Treatment Model for Urban Watersheds. Neely L. Law Watershed Analyst Center for Watershed Protection
Watershed Treatment Model for Urban Watersheds Neely L. Law Watershed Analyst Center for Watershed Protection Outline Background Primary Loads Secondary Loads Current Management Practices Future Development
As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing
N A T U R A L R E S O U R C E C O N S E R V A T I O N As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing conservation
AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE
L OW E R C A R M E L R I V E R A N D L AG O O N F L O O D P L A I N R E S TO R AT I O N A N D E N H A N C E M E N T P R O J E C T AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE FLOOD PROTECTION RESTORE AND PROTECT RIPARIAN
Tennessee Watershed Modeling Tools. Southern Region Watershed Meeting, July 2005. Forbes Walker University of Tennessee Extension
Tennessee Watershed Modeling Tools Southern Region Watershed Meeting, July 2005 Forbes Walker University of Tennessee Extension Outline Land Use and Water Quality in Tennessee Watershed models Watershed
Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters
This document is one chapter from the EPA Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters, published in March 2008. The reference number is EPA 841-B-08-002. You can find the
Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes
Chapter 2 Flash Flood Science A flash flood is generally defined as a rapid onset flood of short duration with a relatively high peak discharge (World Meteorological Organization). The American Meteorological
March 2008. Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District. 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA 92618. Contact: Natalie Likens (949) 453-5633
ADDENDUM TO THE MICHELSON WATER RECLAMATION PLANT PHASE 2 & 3 CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT FEBRUARY 2006 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND THE SAN JOAQUIN FRESHWATER MARSH ENHANCEMENT PLAN REVISED SEPTEMBER
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR WATERBODIES CROSSED BY CONNECTICUT PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT CONNECTICUT LOOP Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company,
Statistical Profile of Lunenburg County
Statistical Profile of Lunenburg County Prepared by the Nova Scotia Federation of Agriculture 1 Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 Agriculture in the Local Economy... 2 2.0 Population and Population Change...
INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS Classification of Zoning Districts Zoning districts in Dorchester County are categorized as Suburban Urban, Suburban Transition, or Rural. These districts are
London Borough of Merton Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary 2014-2020 Introduction In response to the severe flooding across large parts of England and Wales in summer 2007, the Government has recently enacted the Flood
Watershed Education for Teachers. Cinde Thomas-Jimenez Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority
Watershed Education for Teachers Cinde Thomas-Jimenez Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority In This Presentation Why Watersheds Matter What Is a Watershed Water Quality Parameters Point Source and NonPoint
Storm Water Runoff. Managing. A Self-Assessment Guide for Wisconsin Businesses. Storm water runoff is coming. This guide provides businesses
Managing Storm Water Runoff A Self-Assessment Guide for Wisconsin Businesses Storm water runoff is coming under increasing scrutiny as both a source of pollutants to our lakes and streams, and as a cause
The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA
The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA April 17, 2013 Goal To develop a basic understanding of PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and US Army Corps of Engineers
Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500,000 915,960 584,040-39%
NEW JERSEY Original Wetland Acreage Remaining Wetland Acreage Acreage Lost % Lost 1,500,000 915,960 584,040-39% New Jersey Wetlands: Nearly 99 percent of New Jersey s wetlands are palustrine or estuarine.
3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN. 3.4.1 Characteristics of Existing Drainages. 3.4.2 Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN
3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN This section describes the existing onsite drainage characteristics and improvements proposed within this Specific Plan. Following this description, drainage plan development standards
Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting
Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting Agenda Public Outreach, Funding, Monitoring EA/BA/Permit Updates Deconstruction Plans Fish Passage & Salvage Plan Hydraulic Modeling Next Steps Public Outreach,
