Once an assessment has been made, the decision on whether the scheme will be put forward to the Panels will be reported to you.



Similar documents
NORWICH CITY COUNCIL. Report for Resolution

Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council. Policy and Guidelines for Residents Parking Schemes / Zones APPENDICES

REPORT FOR: Traffic and Road Safety Advisory Panel

Economy, Transport and Environment Department. Traffic Management Policy & Guidance

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

SD10: HIGHWAY NETWORK MANAGEMENT BEST VALUE REVIEW. (reproduced review document)

TRAFFIC POLICY NOTE DTP 34/05 LOCAL SPEED LIMITS. Policy. Preamble. Devon Local Transport Plan Objectives. Revisions

Vote on for a: PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST

Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Electrical System. Outline Traffic Management Plan

Footpath Extension Policy

Highway Asset Management Strategy

create, procure or develop new community assets; enhance existing community assets; or enhance or develop initiatives that strengthen a community.

6 Streetscape character 6.1

A23 CHEQUERS ROUNDABOUT, HORLEY: PREDESTRIAN AND CYCLING CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS

Rural Road Safety Policy in Korea: Lesson Learned

7 Guiding delivery - next steps: efficient transport network management

Is your child going to secondary school in September 2016?


Is your child going to secondary school in September 2015?

Development Layout Design

Construction Traffic Management Plan

Consultation and Engagement Strategy

FEES AND CHARGES 2015/16: Highways, Planning, Transport Services and Engineering Design Group. Service

Bedford s Network Management Strategy ( ) November 2010

COPCUT RISE COPCUT RISE DROITWICH SPA CONSULTATION STATEMENT. November Prepared by Capita Lovejoy on behalf of William Davis Limited

Service First request normally supplied free of charge, but minimum charge for additional requests:

Getting around in Essex A bus and passenger transport strategy

AGENDA ITEM: 15 PROPOSED ZEBRA CROSSINGS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS. Executive Director of Development & Environment

Principles of Traffic Management on sites / road network

ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER F East Herts Draft District Plan Consultation Strategy

Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis

Highway Network Management Plan 2008 to 2017

MINUTES of a meeting of the CABINET MEMBER for SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES held at the County Hall, Matlock on 23 November 2006.

WHAT ARE THE GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING A PETITION?

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

Release: 1. RIIOHS302A Implement traffic management plan

ROAD SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR TAH ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY MANAGEMENT

770 TH Tseung Kwan O Development, Phase II, Grade Separated Interchange T1/P1/P2

Professional transport planning, traffic engineering, transport economics and program management solutions

Councillor Richard Blunt

SUFFOLK COASTAL DISTRICT COUNCIL DOMESTIC FLOOD PROTECTION POLICY

1. The consultation seeks views on the vision, targets and measures for improving road safety in Great Britain for the period beyond 2010.

Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury. Persimmon Homes Midlands March 2015


The Corporate Select Committee is asked to note the attached report.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN

Major and Minor Schemes

Date: Classification: Open. Meeting Name: Council Assembly. Item No Adoption of powers to deal with Moving Traffic Offences All

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT CYCLING STRATEGY 29 February 2008

MINUTES of a meeting of the CABINET MEMBER FOR HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT held at County Hall, Matlock on 7 May 2010 PRESENT

Approaches to Consultation and Engagement by Welsh Local Authorities during the Budget-Setting Process. Good Practice Examples

Public Document Pack

2012 No. 767 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ENGLAND. The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012

Major Improvement Schemes in Basingstoke

Welcome Welcome to the public exhibition for development at Bowman Field. This exhibition provides an overview of the proposals for the site.

Roads for All. The Trunk Road Network. Disability Equality Scheme. and. Action Plan

JE PANEL/BENCHMARKING REF NO: 867/4 EVALUATION DATE:

Flood Fact Sheet and Information for the Public in Essex

Network Management Plan Policy Statement. Network Management Plan

TRITON KNOLL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM CONSULTATION: QUESTIONNAIRE

CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN Issue 2, V5, 11/11/13

Self Assessment guidance and matrix for National Indicator NI 188 Planning to adapt to climate change

Flooding Matters. Introduction

JOB RE-EVALUATION POLICY

Appendix K: Network Management Duty

Welsh Government. Practice Guide. Realising the potential of pre-application discussions

DEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY

How To Write A New Bill On Flood Management In Scotland

Pre Application Advice Charging Scheme and Post Application Service Introduction (1 st February 2014)

SETTING LOCAL SPEED LIMITS Draft: July 2012

SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL KEY DECISION TAKEN BY THE CABINET MEMBER FOR HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT

Right to challenge parking policies

Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd. December 2007

RUNNYMEDE LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMME PROGRESS FOR 2003/ /05 AND BID FOR 2005/06 TO 2010/11

Wakefield Council. Cycle Strategy for Wakefield 2013 A guide to delivering cycle infrastructure.

Council Objective: Improve road network and influence improvements in public transport. Quarter 2 Progress Report

Due to very high satisfaction ratings (98%) from 2001 survey, a customer satisfaction survey for cesspool emptying has not been undertaken since.

AGMA Policy for Investigating Flood Incidents

LEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION

Councillor role descriptions

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

MEMBERS CONSIDER THE RISK STRATEGY AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO COUNCIL.

Around 33 million journeys are currently made on Metrolink every year. This is forecast to increase to 44 million journeys by 2019.

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

Our journey to a low carbon economy. Sustainable travel in Greater Manchester

TREE RISK MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

PROPOSED TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF NEW COLLEGE ROAD AT LONDON ROAD

Delineation. Section 4 Longitudinal markings

Tashman Johnson LLC Consultants in Policy, Planning & Project Management

Guidance on the Introduction of Residents Parking Schemes

Public Worksessions - A Summary of the New York City Zoning and Planning Study

Car Parking and Traffic Management around Public Schools

SOUTH EAST GROWTH DEAL

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON BOARD CROXLEY RAIL LINK PROPOSED TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT ORDER

Transport Mobility Management: Small Changes - Big Impacts

CORE OBJECTIVES (LTE)

Road Safety Auditor Certification Compliance with EC Directive 2008/96/EC

CITY OF SUBIACO. PLANNING POLICY 1.4 (September 2013) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF PLANNING PROPOSALS

EDIN BVRGH + DM Guideline: Transport Requirements - Developer Contributions Guideline. Item no. Planning Committee 4 October Purpose of report

Transcription:

New TRO Requests Introduction and Application Form Essex Highways has delegated on-street parking, including lines, signs and restrictions, to the North Essex Parking Partnership (NEPP) in the North of the County with a similar operation in the South (SEPP) as part of the localism agenda. Under these arrangements NEPP has been established and is the formal mechanism through which new parking schemes are made and existing parking restrictions reviewed. The Parking Partnership is made up of Essex County Council plus six District/Borough Councils (Colchester being lead authority together with Braintree, Harlow, Epping, Tendring and Uttlesford). Each Council is represented at Joint Committee meetings by a Councillor, usually a member of their Council s Cabinet. NEPP receives a large number of requests for items such as the one you are making. If it can be evidenced that there is a genuine proven parking safety, congestion or social need then a request can be submitted for consideration. All requests will be initially considered by each individual Council in consultation with their responsible member/s (or such other local mechanism as may be in place) and advice from the NEPP technical officer. For this reason, it is important that all requests include evidence of support obtained locally. This can be from your Local Councillor, County Councillor, a Town or Parish Council. In addition, for Residents Only parking schemes, these requests require a minimum 75% support from other residents living in the street. Each individual District/Borough will put forward recommendations to the Joint Committee who approves whether or not a scheme will be included on a future work programme and move to full consultation. In addition, legislation requires NEPP to undertake a review of parking where there is sufficient demand. Such reviews will be conducted based on the weight of evidence available. Depending upon the size of the review, the timescale may be from 18 months up to a few years in order to consider all views and actions and carry out all the work; the process is the same as for a new restriction. Reference should be made, at this point, to the Parking Enforcement Policy to check if the proposed request will support one or more policy objectives: Highway Safety; Aid to Movement and/or Free Flow of Traffic, Preventing Hindrance and/or Nuisance to other Road Users and/or Supporting Public Transport; Supporting Business, Deliveries and Servicing; Parking Bays. The Policy and minimum requirements can be viewed online at www.parkingpartnership.org (under the Policy, Procedure & Joint Committee Meetings link). Some examples of types of scheme are shown on the following pages for guidance. In order for your request to be properly assessed and evaluated, you will need to provide as much information about it as possible including responding to a number of questions, which are outlined in the attached form. The more information you can supply, the better. Once an assessment has been made, the decision on whether the scheme will be put forward to the Panels will be reported to you. Page 1 of 11

Outside Schools Safety Visibility Safe Crossing Main Roads, busy roads Socially necessary Supporting public transport Road Safety Supports Conservation Area For the majority of the working day Outside or near schools Restricting long-stay parking May include restrictions on loading Near shops and in town centres Socially Necessary Supports business Manages Kerbside for fair access Residential Areas Resident Parking Commuter parking issues Parking to go Shopping Residential areas Resident Permit Schemes Busy Roads, arterial routes Peak hours or part of the working day Restrictions including time-limited waiting, zones and limited waiting parking bays Access and other parking needs Disabled Access Advisory bays Other bays and schemes Other restrictions Supports improved traffic flow tackles congestion and enhances public transport Supports access Assisting business Page 2 of 11

External STAGE 1: APPLICATION Person or organisation making the request Please include your full details so that we can contact you with progress of the scheme, or in case we have any questions. Date: Full Name of the person making the application: Full Postal Address of the person making the application: Email address of the person making the application: Telephone Contact Number of the person making the application: Location Please provide a sketch diagram of the entire area to be considered, and include any additional roads in the immediate area. Please include an Ordnance Survey map reference for the site. 6-fig OS Map Grid Reference Site plan (sketch) Page 3 of 11

Details Please provide as much information as possible. Brief written description and details/outline of the scheme What is the problem which has resulted in this request? (Describe the issues being faced and the causes of the problems) What is the suggested solution to the problem? (Write full details of your project. You could include a detailed sketch or map of the project together with a full explanation of what is needed.) What is to be achieved by the suggested solution? (Describe how this project will alleviate the issues described above and what the result that you wish to achieve is.) What evidence is there of the need for this solution? (This can be provided through either a Parish Plan, survey, questionnaire, copy of letters received, level of local support, etc.) Is/could funding be available for the scheme? Y/N Source of funding? Councillor approval (Ward/District) Page 4 of 11

Internal STAGE 2: SCORING Suggested/preferred solution Initial score DECISION A: INITIAL OFFICER ASSESSMENT Officer recommendation Proceed (y/n)? Reasons Support: Proceed, Defer, Reject? NB: The decision being made here is to commit funding to proceed. Page 5 of 11

Other information from site survey: Is visibility obscured? Near a railway level crossing? Near a signal controlled junction or crossing? Near a zebra crossing? Any other pedestrian facilities nearby (refuge, crossing point)? Any bus stops or facilities nearby or affected? Any special arrangements (e.g. surface, treatments)? Any other hazards which are foreseen (describe below & any mitigation in TM)? Traffic sensitive street? Carriageway: Rural, urban? Frontages: Residential, commercial, mixed, rural? Road speed: (for TM): Underground utility information scans required (where posts need to be installed) Scans undertaken (supply/contractor) Page 6 of 11

STAGE 3: CLIENT REVIEW Result of local informal consultation and scoring with client officer. ParkMap tile produced: Number/version/link to print Scheme design produced: link to text details DECISION B: LOCAL DECISION at LOCAL PANEL Support: Proceed, Defer, Reject? Reasons NB: The decision being made here is to progress with support to JPC Page 7 of 11

STAGE 4: FEASIBILITY Result of local formal consultation and any funding approvals Decision to approve, reject or defer Details of decision (copy text and reasons from Minutes) (defer until date, date logged?) (further information, how, date logged?) Finance: Added to MT Financial Plan Report Template for JPC completed Page 8 of 11

Comms Review NEPP PR Officer informed (date) Details of area, scheme and consultation(s) District: Client Officer: PR Officer of district: DECISION C: DECISION at JOINT COMMITTEE Description of decision and debate at JPC: Support: Proceed, Defer, Reject? Reasons NB: The decision being made here is to progress to formal consultation Decision sent for Review? Y/N Page 9 of 11

STAGE 5: Consulting Engineer Date advised(date/initial): Working Drawings (date/initial): STAGE 6: Progress of Scheme Dates for Legals: Publication date to go on Notice: Newspaper Ad Notice Placed (date/initial): Street Notices Placed (date/initial): Local copies delivered/posted (date/initial): Working Drawings to Eng. (date/initial): DECISION D: OBJECTIONS (if applicable) Decision publication date: Decision date (not less than five working days later): Consultees and interested parties informed Chief Officer Action: Proceed, Change, Reject? Reasons NB: The decision being made here is to progress with scheme on the highway (insert pages here if re-advertising due to changed scheme) Page 10 of 11

STAGE 7: IMPLEMENTATION Dates for Implementation: Live date for enforcement: ParkMap updated (date/initial):... Civil Engineer ordered (date/initial):... Signs/Lines implemented (date/initial):... Site Check: Enforceable (date/initial):... Staff advised (CEO/Office) (date/initial):... Web info updated. (date/initial):... Page 11 of 11