RE: Operational Standards for the Cancer Waiting Times Commitments



Similar documents
Gravesham Borough Council

NHPCO Guidelines for Using CAHPS Hospice Survey Results

Business Plan

IEMA Practitioner Volume 14 Supporting Information

Equal Pay Audit 2014 Summary

NHS Citizen Assembly Stocktake (March 2015) Mental health and parity of esteem. Version 1

Job Profile Data & Reporting Analyst (Grant Fund)

FINANCE SCRUTINY SUB-COMMITTEE

Personal Data Security Breach Management Policy

LINCOLNSHIRE POLICE Policy Document

Terms of Reference for the Fire Review Panel

Change Management Process

Customer Care Policy

KERRY ROGERS, DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE SERVICES/COMPANY SECRETARY

Business Continuity Management Systems Foundation Training Course

Thank you for your interest in this leadership position. Please find enclosed an application and information package to assist you.

CROPREDY SURGERY Dr J Wright & Dr B Tucker

Watlington and Chalgrove GP Practice - Patient Satisfaction Survey 2011

Draft for consultation

Internet and Policy User s Guide

Multi-Year Accessibility Policy and Plan for NSF Canada and NSF International Strategic Registrations Canada Company,

Financial Accountability Handbook

Enrollee Health Assessment Program Implementation Guide and Best Practices

Corporate Standards for data quality and the collation of data for external presentation

This report provides Members with an update on of the financial performance of the Corporation s managed IS service contract with Agilisys Ltd.

Guidelines on Data Management in Horizon 2020

Duration of job. Context and environment: (e.g. dept description, region description, organogram)

Heythrop College Disciplinary Procedure for Support Staff

Grant Application Writing Tips and Tricks

CASSOWARY COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL POLICY ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Phi Kappa Sigma International Fraternity Insurance Billing Methodology

Succession Planning & Leadership Development: Your Utility s Bridge to the Future

Organisational self-migration guide an overview V1-5 April 2014

ITIL Release Control & Validation (RCV) Certification Program - 5 Days

MA Social Work. When does it start? The next intake is September How long is the course? Two years (full-time)

Key Steps for Organizations in Responding to Privacy Breaches

EJttilb Health. The University of Texas Medical Branch Audit Services. Audit Report. Epic In-Basket Management Audit. Engagement Number

How To Measure Call Quality On Your Service Desk

MANITOBA SECURITIES COMMISSION STRATEGIC PLAN

Internal Audit Charter and operating standards

CMS Eligibility Requirements Checklist for MSSP ACO Participation

Software and Hardware Change Management Policy for CDes Computer Labs

How to put together a Workforce Development Fund (WDF) claim 2015/16

Briefing 4 Inquests and the disclosure of information to the coroner

Department of Economic Development. Vocational Training Financial Support Scheme Guidance Document. Updated December 2014

HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT FOR ADJUSTMENT AT THE ENTERPRISE LEVEL

Project Management Fact Sheet:

ISO Management Systems. Guidance on understanding the benefits of an ISO Management System

Request for Proposal (RFP) RFP HQ Training Session and Leadership Program Development Consulting Services

JOB DESCRIPTION. Director of Contracting and Performance

Project Open Hand Atlanta. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES

The Importance Advanced Data Collection System Maintenance. Berry Drijsen Global Service Business Manager. knowledge to shape your future

Risk Management Policy AGL Energy Limited

Data Protection Act Data security breach management

Newborn Blood Spot Failsafe Solution (NBSFS) Operational Level Agreements. Part B: Child Health Record Department (CHRD) Users

Economic Justification: Measuring Return on Investment (ROI) and Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA)

AMWA Chapter Subgroups on LinkedIn Guidance for Subgroup Managers and Chapter Leaders, updated

Privacy Policy. The Central Equity Group understands how highly people value the protection of their privacy.

CLEARANCE REVIEWS FOR STUDENT RESTRICTION ISSUES OTHER THAN ACADEMIC PROGRESS

ACQUIRED RARE DISEASE DRUG THERAPY EXCEPTION PROCESS

7/25/14 FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUPPORT EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK

10 th May Dear Peter, Re: Audit Quality in Australia: A Strategic Review

HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices. Central Ohio Surgical Associates, Inc.

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT. Protecting your Privacy

GP WIND DELIVERABLE D2.2 STAKEHOLDERS QUESTIONNAIRE WP2

nbn is committed to identifying hazards, preventing workplace accidents and minimising dangerous health safety and environment incidents.

Hearing Loss Regulations Vendor information pack

UC Irvine Salary Expense Reduction and Furlough Supplemental FAQs. For Campus, School of Medicine and College of Health Sciences Employees

Maintain a balanced budget primarily the General & Park Funds

Business Continuity Management Policy

Australian Institute of Psychology. Human Research Ethics Committee. Terms of Reference

Verification statement

Ghnjasryj. Aged Care Emergency. Model of Care

Succession management in the Queensland Public Service

Qualification Specification Level 3 Award in Effective Auditing and Inspection Skills

Transcription:

30 July 2009 T: Strategic Health Authrity Chief Executives Primary Care Trust Chief Executives NHS Trust Chief Executives CC: Care Quality Cmmissin Mnitr NHS Imprvement Natinal Cancer Actin Team Strategic Health Authrity GFOCW Leads Prfessr Sir Bruce Kegh NHS Medical Directr Rm 504 Richmnd Huse 79 Whitehall Lndn SW1A 2NS Tel: 020 7210 6302 Gateway Reference: 12320 Dear Clleague RE: Operatinal Standards fr the Cancer Waiting Times Cmmitments As yu knw, the Gvernment s Cancer Refrm Strategy, which was published in December 2007, utlined a significant prgramme t imprve cancer services, further with the aim being t make the services prvided by the NHS amngst the best in the wrld by 2012. One f the specific aims f the Cancer Refrm Strategy was t ensure that mre patients benefited frm the success f the existing cancer waiting times standards by extending these cmmitments. Alngside the intrductin f the new cmmitments frm the Cancer Refrm Strategy, a decisin was taken t align the mnitring f cancer waiting times with the existing 18 weeks data cllectin, the new cmmitments and the changes t the reprting methdlgy are explained in Annex A and B Operatinal standards were previusly set fr the existing cmmitments frm the NHS Cancer Plan. Hwever, the change f reprting methdlgy means that the peratinal standards used previusly fr the assessment f the 31-day and 62-day cmmitments (98% and 95% respectively) are n lnger suitable fr use within the NHS. The Department made a cmmitment t prduce revised peratinal standards t take accunt f these develpments. The new peratinal standards will, as previusly, take int cnsideratin that fr any given perid there will be a number f patients wh are nt available fr treatment within a waiting time standard because: they elect t delay their treatment (patient chice), are unfit fr their treatment r it wuld be clinically inapprpriate t treat them within the standard time. I wuld therefre like t advise yu f the new peratinal standards that will be applied t the existing cmmitments and thse intrduced by the Cancer Refrm Strategy:

Cmmitment (As specified in published Natinal Statistics data - where applicable) 62-Day (Urgent GP Referral T Treatment) Wait Fr First Treatment: All Cancers 62-Day Wait Fr First Treatment Frm Cnsultant Screening Service Referral: All Cancers 31-Day (Diagnsis T Treatment) Wait Fr First Treatment: All Cancers 31-Day Wait Fr Secnd Or Subsequent Treatment: Anti Cancer Drug Treatments Operatinal Standard 85% 90% 96% 98% 31-Day Wait Fr Secnd Or Subsequent Treatment: Surgery 94% 31-Day Wait Fr Secnd Or Subsequent Treatment: Raditherapy Treatments 94% All Cancer Tw Week Wait 93% Tw Week Wait fr Symptmatic Breast Patients (Cancer Nt initially Suspected) 93% Details f the methdlgy used t calculate these standards can be fund in Annex C. An peratinal standard fr the cmmitment f a maximum wait f 62 days fr first treatment fr thse patients wh are upgraded with a suspicin f cancer by the cnsultant respnsible fr their care has nt been prvided. This is because nt enugh patients have benefited frm the implementatin f this service yet t prvide enugh data fr a rbust calculatin f an peratinal standard. This wrk will be undertaken as sn as this is pssible. The Department f Health will use these peratinal standards as part f the assessment f deliverables with the NHS Operating Framewrk, and in ur wrk t supprt the implementatin f the Cancer Refrm Strategy within the NHS. We wuld als recmmend that these peratinal standards be used lcally within the NHS t infrm the develpment f services and the mnitring f Service Level Agreements. These peratinal standards will be shared with the Care Quality Cmmissin t infrm the develpment f indicatrs and scring systems within the assessments they carry ut. As future service develpments are implemented it may be necessary t revise these peratinal standards. Yurs sincerely Prfessr Sir Bruce Kegh NHS Medical Directr Email: bruce.kegh@dh.gsi.gv.uk

ANNEX A Cancer waiting times cmmitments intrduced by the NHS Cancer Plan and the Cancer Refrm Strategy. NHS Cancer Plan Cmmitments: The NHS Cancer Plan, published in September 2000 gave the fllwing cmmitments in relatin t access t cancer services: a maximum wait f tw weeks t see a specialist after being urgently referred with suspected cancer by a GP; a maximum wait f ne mnth frm diagnsis t first treatment fr all cancers; and a maximum wait f tw mnths frm an urgent GP referral fr suspected cancer t first treatment. Cancer Refrm Strategy Cmmitments: In rder t ensure that mre peple benefit frm better access t cancer services the Cancer Refrm Strategy, published in December 2007, gave extended cancer waiting times cmmitments. These new cmmitments are: a maximum wait f tw weeks fr thse patients referred urgently with breast symptms, where cancer is nt initially suspected (t be implemented frm December 2009); a maximum wait f 31 days fr a secnd r subsequent treatment, where the treatment is surgery (implemented frm 31 December 2008); a maximum wait f 31 days fr a secnd r subsequent treatment, where the treatment is an anti-cancer drug regimen (implemented frm 31 December 2008); a maximum wait f 31 days fr a secnd r subsequent treatment, where the treatment is raditherapy (t be implemented frm December 2010); a maximum wait f 62 days fr first treatment fr thse patients referred frm an NHS cancer screening service (implemented frm 31 December 2008); and a maximum wait f 62 days fr first treatment fr thse patients wh are upgraded nt a fast track pathway with a suspicin f cancer by the cnsultant respnsible fr their care (implemented frm 31 December 2008).

Annex B Methd fr Calculating Elapsed Time in a Cancer Waiting Times Perid It was recgnised that supprting the implementatin f the extended waiting times cmmitments within the Cancer Refrm Strategy meant that data wuld have t be cllected fr a much larger vlume f patients and episdes. In rder t minimise this burden upn NHS prviders it was decided t take the pprtunity affrded by this develpment t align with the existing 18 weeks data cllectin. Under this simplified prcess, cancer treatment prviders n lnger have t cllect infrmatin abut suspensins arising frm patients unfitness fr treatment r frm their taking time t think abut and discuss their varius treatment ptins. This updated data cllectin prcess therefre: makes the calculatin f waiting times mre meaningful fr patients by aligning it mre fully with their actual experience; vertime reduces the burden n the NHS f cllecting data, particularly f data that is nt used fr clinical purpses; streamlines the data cllectin prcess fr treatment prviders; brings cancer waiting times data int the mainstream f NHS perfrmance data prcesses; supprts patient chice and clinical autnmy (nt every patient wants t be treated within the standard time, and nt every patient can be); and helps deliver a service that better meets patients expectatins.

Annex C Overview f the methdlgy Used fr Calculating the Operatinal Standards These peratinal standards were calculated using statistics cllected in quarter three 2008/09 which gave accurate infrmatin detailing levels f patient chice r medical suspensins and current mnitring statistics (including perfrmance levels and admissin rates by tumur type and mdality). Where insufficient numbers f patient recrds relatin t secnd r subsequent treatment existed activity statistics frm 2008/09 relating t first treatment activity have been used as a prxy. Advice n the levels f cmplex individual cases where the cmmitments shuld nt be met fr clinical reasns was als factred int the mdelling. The apprpriateness f these peratinal standards was cnsidered by the Ging Further On Cancer Waits Advisry Grup, which includes representatives frm stakehlder rganisatins and the clinical cmmunity.