First Power Production figures from the Wave Star Roshage Wave Energy Converter



Similar documents
Performance Evaluation of the Wavestar Prototype

Wavestar prototype at Roshage Performance data for ForskVE project no phase 1 & 2, January 2013

First Power Production Results from the Wave Star Roshage Wave Energy Converter

The extensive R&D behind the Weptos WEC

HYDRAULICS. H91.8D/C - Computerized Open Surface Tilting Flow Channel - 10, 12.5, 15 and 20 m long

Frequency-domain and stochastic model for an articulated wave power device

Primer: Power from Ocean Waves and Tides

1x90 TONS TENSIONERS TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. 1 X 90 Tons 30 m/min Tensioners TECHNICAL PROPOSAL JOB 08/ /02/2008 Basic proposal PP GM SB

Modelling and Control of the Wavestar Prototype

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

V kw The turbine that goes anywhere

Monobuckets and the competitiveness versus monopiles and jacket structures.

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF REGULAR WAVES RUN-UP OVER SLOPPING BEACH BY OPEN FOAM

Speed A B C. Time. Chapter 3: Falling Objects and Projectile Motion

MIKE 21 FLOW MODEL HINTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN APPLICATIONS WITH SIGNIFICANT FLOODING AND DRYING

Developing Ocean Energy in Ireland. Belmullet Wave Energy Test Site

MODEL BASED DESIGN OF EFFICIENT POWER TAKE-OFF SYSTEMS FOR WAVE ENERGY CONVERTERS

Stress and deformation of offshore piles under structural and wave loading

CO-LOCATED WAVE AND OFFSHORE WIND FARMS: A PRELIMINARY CASE STUDY OF AN HYBRID ARRAY

MAXIMIZING THE OUTPUT OF YOUR BRAKES Getting Your Pedal Geometry Right

Session 21 Max Sheppard. Improved Complex Pier Scour Prediction Procedure

NOTE. Note on the pumped storage potential of the Onslow-Manorburn depression, New Zealand

Overturning Stability of Offshore Wind Power Substructure with Bucket Foundation

The Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center

Marine and Hydrokinetic U.S. Resource Assessments and Technologies

2.0 BASIC CONCEPTS OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT

Havnepromenade 9, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark. Denmark. Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark

APPLIED PNEUMATICS AND HYDRAULICS H TUTORIAL HYDRAULIC AND PNEUMATIC CYLINDERS. This work covers part of outcome 2 of the standard Edexcel module.

Using Renewable Energy to Pump Water

Unit 24: Applications of Pneumatics and Hydraulics

COWI offshore wind marine engineering services

Step 11 Static Load Testing

Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load

Oil Dampers with Fixings on. Both Ends. Damping Engineering Oil Dampers with Fixings on Both Ends. Technical Data

CFD SUPPORTED EXAMINATION OF BUOY DESIGN FOR WAVE ENERGY CONVERSION

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

CFD Modelling and Real-time testing of the Wave Surface Glider (WSG) Robot

skirt Appendix A Mechanical Containment and Cleanup Technologies Containment Booms

INSTALLATION AND OPERATION MANUAL

Intensium Max. A range of ready-to-install containerised energy storage for renewable energies and grid management

Managing sewer flood risk

Wind Turbine Power Calculations

CHAPTER 3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Analysis of Discrete Pressure Level Systems for Wave Energy Converters

Gravir Outer, Isle of Lewis Site and Hydrographic survey report

AS COMPETITION PAPER 2008

Sanitary Sewer Overflows Leave Telltale Signs in Depth-Velocity Scattergraphs

HOMER Software Training Guide for Renewable Energy Base Station Design. Areef Kassam Field Implementation Manager

CHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS

Belt Conveyor System

Wave & Tidal Energy. Wave and Tidal Energy. What is Wave energy? What is Tidal Energy?

MEASUREMENTS OF THRUST LOAD IN CABLE SYSTEMS SEMI-RIGIDLY INSTALLED IN DUCT / MANHOLE STRUCTURES

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

Experimental Evaluation of the Discharge Coefficient of a Centre-Pivot Roof Window

In-situ Load Testing to Evaluate New Repair Techniques

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

MI oceanographic data

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 2, Issue 5, May 2013

An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test

User manual data files meteorological mast NoordzeeWind

Techno-Economics of Distributed Generation and Storage of Solar Hydrogen

Outer Diameter 23 φ mm Face side Dimension 20.1 φ mm. Baffle Opening. Normal 0.5 Watts Maximum 1.0 Watts Sine Wave.

The CLIPPER Solutions

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology Volume 4, Issue 2: Page No , March-April 2015

SANITARY SEWER SPECIFICATIONS

Structural concepts for minimum facility platforms for Marginal field development in western offshore, India

MICRO-HYDROPOWER NEED FOR ENERGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT. By: Payman Hassan Rashed

LINEAR MOTOR CONTROL IN ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS

Building Research Capacity for Marine Renewable Energy in Ireland. Prof. Tony Lewis Emeritus Beaufort Professor University College Cork, Ireland

Pumps: Convert mechanical energy (often developed from electrical source) into hydraulic energy (position, pressure and kinetic energy).

Name Class Date. You do twice as much work. b. You lift two identical books one meter above the ground.


Analysis of seismic response control for long-span cable-stayed. bridge under traveling wave input *

Analysis of the Interstate 10 Twin Bridge s Collapse During Hurricane Katrina

Selecting a Transmission Line for Your Broadcast System

RECYCLED MICRO HYDROPOWER GENERATION USING HYDRAULIC RAM PUMP (HYDRAM)

OWNER S/OPERATOR S - PARTS MANUAL CEMENT MIXER MODEL MX-80

Offshore Wind Farms the Need for Metocean Data

Solar and Wind Energy for Greenhouses. A.J. Both 1 and Tom Manning 2

Up and Running with Autodesk Inventor Professional Simulation in 90 Minutes!

FLow pattern around cable and its aerodynamic characteristics in critical Reynolds number range

Norconsult AS Trekanten, Vestre Rosten 81, NO-7075 Tiller Memo no.: 1 Tel: Fax:

Physics 40 Lab 1: Tests of Newton s Second Law

Technical handbook Panel Anchoring System

Simulation of Offshore Structures in Virtual Ocean Basin (VOB)

Impact of Reflectors on Solar Energy Systems

LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO

Tesla Wireless Energy Transfer at CCC

CHAPTER 4 4 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS

Numerical Analysis of the Moving Formwork Bracket Stress during Construction of a Curved Continuous Box Girder Bridge with Variable Width

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF WIND ON BUILDING STRUCTURES

The Coast of Crystal Cove Orange County, California

5-Axis Test-Piece Influence of Machining Position

High-efficient gas boiler CompactGas

Case Study 5 Use of Wind Turbine Technology

Laws of Collision / demonstration track

B) 286 m C) 325 m D) 367 m Answer: B

Transcription:

First Power Production figures from the Wave Star Roshage Wave Energy Converter L. Marquis 1, M. Kramer 1 and P. Frigaard 1 Wave Star A/S, Gammel Vartov Vej 0, 900 Hellerup, Denmark E-mail: info@wavestarenergy.com Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark E-mail: pf@civil.aau.dk Abstract Wave Star A/S has produced and installed a test and demonstration Wave Energy Converter (WEC) by Roshage pier near Hanstholm at the west coast of Denmark. The test unit is a prototype/test section of a complete commercial WEC. Only a few days after the installation, which took place in September 009, the first storm with wind speeds above 30 m/s passed. During the winter more storms have passed without any damage. After an initial period of finalizing the installation and testing, the WEC was launched for production in January 010 and in May 010 automatic unmanned operation was initiated. The first production figures show that the absorption is taking place in accordance with the expectations and targets. No unexpected performance has been noticed. The Roshage WEC is an ideal test converter for the further development of the Wave Star concept, and several activities are planned in order to demonstrate the future potential. The converter can be accessed by foot on a 300 m long access bridge via the pier from the beach. More than 30 groups have already visited the converter. Keywords: Wave, Wave Star, wave energy converter 1. Introduction The Wave Star Roshage test unit is the main result of several years of development. In 004 a small 6 m long scale 1:40 converter with 40 floats was tested in an indoor wave basin at Aalborg University in Denmark. In 006 a 30 m long scale 1:10 converter with 40 floats was installed in the sea at Nissum Bredning in Denmark. The converter has been in daily operation in Nissum Bredning since, and has been connected to the public grid. The WEC has been able to produce energy persistently during 4 years. During the test period the WEC has demonstrated high reliability and it has survived 15 storms. Only very limited maintenance has been necessary. [1-5] Based on positive results from the small-scale experiments Wave Star produced and installed the largescale test and demonstration WEC by Roshage pier at the western coast of Denmark, see Fig. 1. The WEC is a prototype/test section of a complete commercial 1000 kw WEC. The test section has floats whereas the full commercial converter will have 0 floats. The test section was installed in September 009 at a water depth of approximately 6 m. The purposes of the test section are primarily to: 1. Test the structure and components. Prove the storm protection strategy 3. Verify the reliability and document the ability to be in daily operation 4/7/365 4. Confirm the calculated -curves for harvested wave energy 5. Demonstrate and improve the efficiency of the take off 6. Provide a test-platform for future new components Furthermore, the WEC is used as a demonstration plant for politicians, journalists, investors and other stakeholders. The WEC can be accessed at any time and in any weather condition due to its place near the Roshage pier and a 300 meter long access platform.. Status of the Roshage unit After an initial period of final installation and testing of components the WEC was launched for production in January 010 and in May 010 it was ready for automatic unmanned production. Only the jacking procedure, which is used to survive extreme storms are coming, is still remotely controlled. The status with respect to the purposes for the test section is described in Table. The Wave Star Roshage test unit is now supplying wave energy to the public grid. 1

Figure 1: Wave Star Roshage Wave Energy Converter. Top: Location of site (Google Earth). Bottom left: Photo of installation by barge. Bottom center: Photo of storm protection. Bottom Right: Photo of normal operation. Parameter Commercial Wave Star C5-1000 kw Roshage test unit Number of floats 0 Float diameter Ø5 m Ø5 m Maximum water depth (extreme) 0 m 8 m Maximum wave height (operation) 6 m 6 m Arm length 10 m 10 m Main structure dimensions 70m x 17m x 6.5m (LxWxH) 3m x 17m x 6.5m Length of legs Site depended, ~ 15-5 m above MWL ~ 18 m above MWL Operation height 5.5 m above MWL 5.5 m above MWL Storm secure height Site depended, ~ 6-15 m above MWL ~ 8 m above MWL Weight 1600 Tons 1000 Tons Materials Main structure: Steel. Main structure: Steel Floats: Fibreglass Floats: Fibreglass Foundation Four skirted spud cans, or two mono piles or Four gravity based foundations gravity based foundations Design service life Minimum 0 years Minimum 0 years Maintenance interval 1 service period per year 1 service period per year Nominal electrical 1000 kw 110 kw Table 1: Technical data for commercial Wave Star C5-converter and Roshage test unit. MWL is Mean Water Level.

Purpose Status by June 010 All structural, mechanical, electrical and hydraulic components Test the structure and components in the WEC have proven 100% functionality Prove the storm protection strategy Verify the reliability and document the ability to be in daily operation 4/7/365 Confirm the calculated -curves for harvested wave energy The WEC has by the storm protection strategy survived several storms with no damages and no service afterwards The WEC is running in automatic unmanned operation and the control system automatically extracts the floats from the water lifting them to the upper latched position when needed. The jacking procedure to storm protection level is still operated manually. A longer period (of several months) with continuous operation without stops is still to be documented. Measurement points have verified the expected level of harvested, although further development of the control system is expected to increase the level further. More details are given in Section 4. The first test results have shown challenges in ensuring a high efficiency of the complete Demonstrate the transmission to the electrical efficiency of the grid. A focus point for the future take off work is optimization and further efficiency improvements of the hydraulic and electrical systems. Table : Status for the Roshage unit in June 010. 3. Technical design of Wave Star The WEC is designed for unmanned operation with remote monitoring of data. The commercial WEC is equipped with 0 floats, each float having a diameter of Ø5m. The floats are mounted on a 10 m long steel arm and these arms are hinged on the main tube, 10 on each side. The Roshage unit is a shortened section of the complete WEC; it has floats of Ø5m placed on one side. The test section is fully equipped according to the complete WEC. When the waves are moving a float and arm up and down the is transferred to the Power Take Off (PTO) by a hydraulic cylinder. The main tube is containing all equipment such as PTO and control systems in an interior climate environment which is ensuring a long life time of the components. The main tube is connected to a jacking sections at each end. These jacking sections contain the jacking system, which lifts the main tube along the four legs up to the storm protection level when necessary. During normal production, the jacking system maintains the main tube at a fixed production level. The four legs are standing on the seabed via four individual concrete foundations. All main structures are made of steel except for the floats which are made of fibreglass. The WEC is designed to produce energy in waves with a maximum wave height H max = 6 m which corresponds to a site specific significant wave height normally close to H max / = 3 m. At higher waves the arms are lifted out of the water and the WEC is jacked up to storm protection level, see Fig.. The commercial WEC is designed to be installed at 0 m maximum water depth under storm conditions (highest water depth) and it is designed to be in operation for minimum 0 years. Further details of technical data for the commercial WEC and the test section is outlined in Table 1. An artists impression of the commercial WEC is shown in Fig. 3. Floats in storm protection mode Figure : Wave Star storm protection concept. WEC in operation Holes in legs for jacking WEC in storm protection Figure 3: Artist impression of a commercial Wave Star WEC. Floats in production mode 3

4. General about optimizing The general parameters influencing the yearly energy production are outlined in the following. Examples are given with respect to the Wave Star converter, but the issues are the same for any kind of WEC. Wave climate The production is mainly influenced by the wave height, wave period and wave direction. Waves in nature are irregular in shape and therefore a sea state of several minutes is traditionally used to describe the waves. A sea state is normally defined by statistical parameters such as significant wave height, peak wave period, and mean wave direction. By far the most dominating parameter for the production is the significant wave height, and therefore the curves usually focus on this parameter. Physical structural setup The layout and size of the machine is important, e.g. such as: Number of floats - Size, shape and weight of floats - Position of individual floats in array relative to each other - Inclination of arms relative to water surface - Orientation of arms relative to wave direction. Also physical limits (e.g. limits on acceptable maximum motions) influences the potential harvested. Structural strength and flexibility might limit the acceptable peaks and/or affect the harvested. The part of year in production If the waves are higher than a certain limit the converter will be in storm protection and no electricity is produced. In addition, other environmental factors (such as low temperatures and/or extremely low or high water levels) will limit the time of operation. Additional reductions are due to repairs and maintenance. Control strategy More advanced control strategies can extract more. However more advanced control strategies requires a more advanced PTO system which is more expensive and might also be less efficient. PTO efficiency Losses in mechanical, hydraulic and electrical components is described by an efficiency coefficient which can be between 0 and 100 %. If the efficiency is 100 % there are no losses. PTO limits and capabilities The PTO have certain limits on forces, velocities and. The limits influences the harvested and the produced electricity. In order to get the most optimal design at a given site a full cost-optimization is ideally in general necessary taking all the above parameters into account. The Wave Star C5-1000kW converter has a fixed physical structural design which is only slightly adjusted to a given site. The optimization of the output therefore reduces to the interaction between the PTO components, the control strategy, and the actual wave climate at a given site. 5. Measured by the Roshage unit The first production from both floats with the full PTO in operation was performed on 15 January 010, and the first electricity was delivered to the grid. On 7 January 010 the first simultaneous measurements of wave climate and production was acquired. The first part of 010 has been used for manned operation with initial tests of the systems. Starting from May 010 the converter is now running in unmanned continuous operation most of the time. As outlined in Section 4 the production depends on the wave climate and several other parameters. By far the most dominating parameter for the production is the significant wave height, and therefore the curves presented subsequent focus on this parameter. The transferred from the water into the PTO is termed harvested. Mechanical losses in the transfer from the motions of the float to the motion of the hydraulic cylinder is neglected (originally the harvested comes from the water pressures on the float shell and the motions), i.e. losses due to structure flexibility and friction in bearings and cylinder are neglected. Hereby the harvested is defined as equal to the hydraulic leaving the hydraulic cylinder, which is subsequently flowing through the PTO, see Fig. 4. Wave Harvested PTO Figure 4: Overview of transfer. Electrical The harvested is found from direct measurement of the pressure in the hydraulic system multiplied by the flow velocity. The flow velocity is found from direct measurement of the cylinder piston velocity multiplied by the piston area. The waves are measured directly at the location by an ultrasonic wave gauges. In Fig. 5 the measured production in May 010 is shown by the black x-marks. The measurements show some spread, which is due to the dependence on other parameters besides the significant wave height (e.g. wave period, wave direction, control parameters, etc.). Three curves are plotted in Fig. 5. The curves are the result of mathematical computer simulations using three different control strategies established for a typical wave direction and wave period. The measurements are seen to fit well in between the two lowest curves. 4

Wave Star Roshage WEC. Data from May 010. 10 minute average values. 18 Harvested from a single float (kw) 16 14 1 10 8 6 4 Measurements from May 010 (using simple control strategy) Advanced control strategy simulation, optimal parameters Simple control strategy simulation, optimal parameters Simple control strategy simulation, non-optimal parameters 0 0.0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1. 1.4 1.6 1.8.0..4.6 Significant wave height Hs (m) Figure 5: Power measurements from initial test period with Wave Star Roshage WEC. A simple control strategy was applied in the control software during the measurements. 6. Conclusions and future activities The Wave Star test unit at Hanstholm was installed in September 009. Starting from May 010 the converter was running in unmanned continuous operation. The WEC has survived several storms with no damages and no service afterwards. The first measurements of the production are in agreement with the expectations. In order to minimize the risk of damages it was chosen to start the initial testing using a very simple control strategy. Hereby the peaks in forces, motions and s would only apply moderate load to the PTO. A new and improved control strategy is under implementation. Calculations show that this will increase the production significantly. The increase in using the improved strategy has further been demonstrated in small scale in real sea in Nissum Bredning [6]. The converter at Roshage is an ideal test WEC for the further development of the Wave Star concept. Several activities are planned in order to demonstrate the future potential, e.g.: New control strategies will be implemented giving an expected increase in production. More tests will be performed in order to document and confirm the overall performance under a variety of sea and weather conditions. The efficiency of the PTO will be improved in order to minimize losses and thereby maximizing the electricity delivered to the grid. The time out of operation will be minimized in order to demonstrate the reliability of the systems and increase the total MWh production. New components are planned to be tested on the test-unit before inclusion in the commercial WEC. References [1] www.wavestarenergy.com [] A. Bjerrum (008): The Wave Star Energy Concept. ICOE 008 (International Conference on Ocean Energy), 15-17 October 008, Brest, France, www.icoe008.com. [3] J.P. Kofoed, P. Frigaard, M. Kramer (006): Recent Developments of Wave Energy Utilization in Denmark. Workshop on renewable ocean energy utilization at 0th annual conference. Korean Society of Ocean Engineers. [4] P.R. Steenstrup (006): Wave Star Energy new wave energy converter, which is now under going sea trials in Denmark. Int Conf Ocean Energy. Bremerhaven, October 006. [5] K. Nielsen, M.S. Jensen (004). WaveStar multi-float system performance calculation. Rambøll ref. no. 4301. http://www.risoe.dk/rispubl/nei/nei-dk-4501.pdf. [6] P. Frigaard, T. L. Andersen (009): Power figures from Wave Star in Nissum Bredning. Final report PSO-F&U 008-1-1003. DCE Technical Report No. 61, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University. ISSN 1901-76X. 5