F A C U L T Y H A N D B O O K

Transcription

1 F A C U L T Y H A N D B O O K 26th Edition 2013

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - ORGANIZATION Mission Goals Baccalaureate Nursing Program Goals Master s Nursing Program Goals DNP Program PhD Nursing Program Goals Philosophy of the School of Nursing Conceptual Framework Student Learning Outcomes Standards of Practice UNCG Organizational Chart School of Nursing Organizational Chart Position Description: Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study Position Description: Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Programs Position Description: Associate Dean for Research Position Description: Director BSN/MSN Outreach Programs: Hickory, NC Position Description: Department Chair Position Description: Director of PhD Program Position Description: Instructional Technology Consultant Position Description: Instructional Technology Specialist/Webmaster Position Description: Hardware Technology Consultant Position Description: Director of Undergraduate Advising Position Description: Statistician/Biostatistician Position Description: Course Chair Position Description: Class Advisor Position Description: Honors Liaison/Advisor Position Description: Lab Coordinator Position Description: OSHA Trainer PART II BYLAWS & COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS Article 1 The Faculty Section 1: Statement of Responsibility and Authority Section 2: Purpose Section 3: Functions Section 4: Membership & Voting Privileges Section 5: Meetings & Procedures Section 6: Standing Committees Section 7: Ad Hoc Committees Section 8: Election and Appointment to University Committees Article II Administration Section 1: The Dean Section 2: The Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate, Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study, Associate Dean for Research Section 3: The Administrative Assistant to the Dean Section 4: Administrative Advisory Council Section 5: Student Advisory Committee Article III Nominations and Elections Section 1: Responsibilities i

3 PART II CONTINUED Section 2: Nominations Section 3: Elections Section 4: Written Ballots Article IV Amendments Section 1: Amendments Section 2: Suspension of Bylaws Appendix to Bylaws: Standing Committee Descriptions BSN Council Bylaws and Elections Committee Curriculum Committee Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Committee Evaluation Committee Learning Resources Committee MSN Council PhD Council Promotion, Tenure, Reappointment, and Post-Tenure Review Committee Research and Scholarship Committee Scholarship Committee Student Admission, Progression, and Appeals committee Student Recruitment and Orientation Committee Teaching and Excellence Award Committee PART III POLICIES Academic Program Policies Academic Integrity Policy Course Attendance Permission to Miss Class/Clinical Student Records Adverse Weather & Campus Closure Notification of Withdrawal/Cancellation Due to Class Attendance Student Dress Code Policy Uniform Guidelines Hygiene/Grooming/Professional Presentation Agency Requirements Grading Grading System Grading Scale Course Syllabus (Guide) Student Appeal Request Form Formal Complaint Agency-School Instructional Agreements & Letters of Agreement Agency Letter of Agreement Guidelines for Faculty-Agency Liaison Practicum Rotation Form Informed Consent Agreement to Participate in Laboratory/Clinical Courses Procedure for Evaluation of Student in Courses with a Clincal Component Clinical Evaluation Guide Criteria for Utilization of Preceptors Guidelines for Preceptor Vitae Preceptor Vita Form Responsibilities in Nurse Preceptor Relationship ii

4 PART III CONTINUED Responsibilities in Resource Person Relationship Disaster Plans Procedure for Peer/Administrative Evaluation of Teaching Peer/Administrative Evaluation of Teaching Form Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education Procedure for Administrative Evaluation of Faculty Report Form for Annual Faculty Reviews Annual Faculty Evaluation by Department Chair Form Dean Evaluation Form Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study Evaluation Form Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study Evaluation Form Associate Dean for Research Evaluation Form Director of Doctoral Program Evaluation Form Statistician/Biostatistician Evaluation Form Department Chair Evaluation Form Procedure for Evaluation of Clinical Sites Used for Student Learning Faculty Feedback on Clinical Sites (FFCS) Procedures for Obtaining Feedback in Clinical Courses Using Preceptors Faculty Feedback on Preceptor Effectiveness (FFPE) Preceptor s Feedback on Student Performance (PFSP) Student Evaluation of Faculty and Courses Student Evaluation of Courses: Form Student Evaluation of Faculty in Clinical Course with Preceptor: Form Student Evaluation of Faculty in Clinical: Form Student Evaluation of Faculty in Classroom: Form Faculty Responsibilities Faculty Travel Student Management of Parenteral/Mucous Membrane Exposures UNCG Report of Injury/Near Miss Hazardous Wastes in the Learning Laboratory Parenteral/Mucous Membranes in the Learning Laboratory Policy: Faculty Appointments in the School of Nursing Guidelines for Research & Scholarship Activities Research by Students Grant Proposals Research Using School of Nursing Faculty or Students as Subjects Research Involving Human Participants Research Involving Animal Subjects Scientific Integrity Data and Safety Monitoring Resources for Research and Scholarship Activities Research Confidentiality Agreement Protocol Review Checklist Data Safety Monitoring Guidelines for Human Subjects Research Data Safety Monitoring Checklist for Human Subjects Research Guidelines for Authorship and Ownership Authorship/Ownership Agreement Promotion and Tenure Criteria and Procedures Guidelines for Promotion, Tenure, Reappointment, and Post-Tenure Review Procedures Assistant Professor Associate Professor Professor Procedures in Regard to Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion and Tenure Evaluation Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Assistant Professor Associate Professor iii

5 PART III CONTINUED Professor Reappointment Form Guidelines for Post-Tenure Review Procedures UNCG Post-Tenure Review Form Clinical Track Document Preface Clinical Track Criteria Clinical Instructor Clinical Assistant Professor Clinical Associate Professor Clinical Professor Appointment and Reappointment Procedures for the Clinical Track Students Special Requirements Policy on Unsafe Practice PART IV PROCEDURES Academic Procedures Procedures for Notifying Students of Unsatisfactory Progress Procedures for Requesting Clinical Sites Guidelines for Submitting Word Processing/Copying to Faculty Secretaries Criteria for Teaching Excellence Award Staff Excellence Award Systematic Program Evaluation Plan Schedule of Systematic Curriculum Evaluation Curriculum Committee Evaluation Checklist for Undergraduate Courses Curriculum Committee Evaluation Checklist for Undergraduate Non-Nursing Courses Curriculum Committee Evaluation Checklist for Graduate Courses Curriculum Committee Evaluation Checklist for Graduate Concentrations INDEX iv

6 PART I ORGANIZATION

7 I UNCG School of Nursing Mission The mission of the UNCG School of Nursing is to make a difference in the lives of nursing students and the communities it serves by being inclusive, collaborative, and responsive. The School of Nursing is a: Learner-centered community preparing nursing generalists, specialists, and researchers through campus, distance, and online programs. Scholarly community advancing knowledge through collaborative research that will enhance the discipline of nursing and health of persons across the lifespan. Source of leadership to meet regional and global nursing and healthcare challenges. Diverse school integrating intercultural and international perspectives into learning, inquiry, and service. (Adapted from UNCG Mission, 2009, 2010) 5/10/94; 11/11/98; 1/23/02; 03/06; 12/09; 5/13 1

8 I SCHOOL OF NURSING GOALS The School of Nursing is committed to excellence in accomplishing the following goals: 1. Provide professional nursing programs at baccalaureate, masters and doctoral levels based on standards of nursing practice. 2. Conduct collaborative research and scholarly activities to advance the discipline of nursing and health of persons across the lifespan. 3. Provide professional and public service to meet regional and global healthcare needs. 4. Prepare professional nurses to deliver evidenced based practice in a variety of settings. 11/11/98;1/23/02; 03/06; 12/09 BACCALAUREATE NURSING PROGRAM GOALS The baccalaureate program prepares graduates for the following: 1. Practice professional nursing based on inquiry, caring, and standards of practice. 2. Function independently and collaboratively within the healthcare system to deliver evidenced based nursing care to individuals, families, groups, and communities. 11/93; 11/11/98; 1/23/02; 03/06; 12/09 MASTER S NURSING PROGRAM GOALS The master s program prepares graduates for the following: 1. Perform as advanced practice registered nurses, educators, or administrators according to standards of practice. 2. Assume leadership roles in promoting quality nursing and healthcare regionally and globally. 3. Utilize evidence to improve nursing practice and healthcare outcomes.. 7/92; 11/11/98; 1 /23/02; 4/23/03; 03/06; 12/09 DNP PROGRAM GOALS The DNP program prepares graduates for the following: 1. Practice as advanced practice registered nurses to advance the discipline and nursing profession through clinical practice. 2. Assume leadership roles in the delivery of optimal healthcare. 3. Appraise evidence to improve nursing practice and healthcare outcomes. 5/13 2

9 PhD NURSING PROGRAM GOALS The PhD program prepares graduates for the following: 1. Practice as nurse scientists to advance the discipline and nursing profession through scholarly inquiry. 2. Assume leadership roles in promoting optimal health for ethnic minorities, women, children, and older adults. 3. Meet the academic and healthcare industry needs for nursing scholars in North Carolina and the nation. 9/04; 03/06; 12/09 3

10 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Philosophy The philosophy of the faculty at the School of Nursing is a statement of the beliefs and values they hold about the discipline and profession of nursing as well as nursing education. The conceptual framework and the goals of the undergraduate and graduate programs are built upon this philosophy. Nursing is both a practice discipline and a profession. Comprising the discipline is a unique body of knowledge that is integral to nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing administration. The body of knowledge is continuously developed and refined as an outcome of scientific, historical, philosophical, and ethical inquiry. Nursing knowledge is generated about health experiences and behaviors of persons across the life span. Testing and validation of interventions used in nursing practice generates evidence to support best practices. The metaparadigm concepts of person, environment, health, and nursing form the foundation upon which inquiry and the profession are based. Nurses use knowledge developed by the discipline to promote optimal health and achieve professional goals. Nursing is an essential component of the healthcare delivery system and includes the promotion of wellness, the detection of alterations in health, and the provision of care for those with illness, disease, or dysfunction. Professional nursing is characterized by inquiry, caring, and practice. Nurses are professionally, ethically, and legally accountable for the care they provide; and their practice includes independent and collaborative functions. Nursing education is built upon a foundation of a broad general education and professional nursing curriculum that provides opportunities for learners to attain knowledge and competencies required to practice nursing. Mature learners identify their own learning needs and assume responsibility for continued learning. Effective teachers establish a learner-centered environment that promotes collaboration among themselves and their learners for achievement of educational goals. Baccalaureate education prepares nurses to practice as generalists, while specialty education at the master s level prepares advanced practice registered nurses, administrators, and educators. At the doctoral level, nurses are prepared as scientists to practice in academia and industry and as advanced practice registered nurses for delivery of healthcare. 5/87;8/91;7/92;11/98;6/0;1/23/02; 09/05; 03/06; 12/09; 5/13 4

11 I CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK The conceptual framework of the School of Nursing may be summarized in the following statements: Health is a result of the interaction of a person with the environment and constantly changes across time. Nursing is the resource in the environment that can influence the health of a person through use of the processes of inquiry, caring, and practice. The conceptual framework serves as a guide for the selection of nursing content, ordering of courses, and sequencing of meaningful learning experiences. The movement through the curriculum has as bi-determinants both content and process components. Content Components The four concepts central to the curriculum are person, environment, health, and nursing. The concepts are defined as follows: Person Person incorporates the concepts of learner, self, individuals, families, groups, and communities. Human beings are unique individuals who have worth, rights, and inherent dignity. Persons have biological, psychological, social, spiritual, and cultural traits that influence their development. Throughout the life span, individuals exist within a cultural and social milieu and encounter phenomena that have an impact on optimal health and development. Environment Environment is the sum total of all internal and external phenomena and processes that have an impact on people. Environment includes physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and cultural elements as well as historical, political, and economic conditions. Nursing is a resource in the environment that can influence health of a person. Health Health represents a dynamic state of being resulting from interaction of person and environment. Health is actualized through competent personal care, goal directed behavior, and satisfying relationships with others. Adjustments are made as needed to maintain stability and structural integrity. A person s state of health can vary from optimum wellness to illness, disease, and dysfunction and changes throughout an individuals life span, including at the end of life. Nursing Nursing is the teaching of health promotion practices; the continuous care of the acutely or chronically ill; the restorative care during convalescence and rehabilitation; the supportive care given to maintain the optimum level of health of individuals, families, groups, and communities; the teaching and evaluation of those who perform or are learning to perform these functions; the support and conduct of research to extend knowledge and practice; and the management of health care delivery. 5

12 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Page 2 Process Components Interwoven with the concepts which determine content are those process concepts which nursing uses to maintain and improve the health of persons in their environment. These processes include inquiry, caring, and practice and are conceptualized as follows: Inquiry Inquiry is the process of seeking, developing, and applying knowledge. Inquiry includes the nursing process, scientific process, and research process. It also includes critical thinking, a deliberate and systematic process, which involves analysis and interpretation, inductive and deductive reasoning, drawing logical inferences, and evaluating and justifying conclusions. Caring Caring is a process, a way of relating to someone that involves development. In a caring relationship, a person or idea is experienced both as an extension and as something separate from oneself. One experiences what is cared for as having dignity and worth with potentialities and need for growth and development. Caring is the antithesis of possessing, manipulating, or dominating. In any actual instance of caring, there must be someone or something specific that is cared for. Caring cannot occur in the abstract, nor can it occur by sheer habit. An essential ingredient of caring is communication: a dynamic, developmental process of transmitting perceptions, thoughts, and ideas in verbal, non-verbal, and written interactions. Within an intentional caring process, messages are effectively conveyed by persons or through technology. Other essential ingredients of the caring process are: knowledge, self-awareness, patience, honesty, trust, humility, hope, and courage. Practice The ability to provide evidenced based nursing interventions is the core of professional nursing practice. Nursing interventions are those direct or indirect interactions that occur between a nurse and client to diagnose and treat human responses to actual or potential health problems. Furthermore, nursing interventions have cultural and ethnic relevance for the client and are carried out within the ethical and legal domains of practice. In clinical practice, nurses use the nursing process to interact with clients in achieving mutual goals. The nursing process is informed through nursing research and consists of activities related to assessment, diagnosis, analysis, planning, implementation, and evaluation. Professional nurses acquire and maintain current knowledge and are willing to participate in peer review and other activities that insure quality of care. Nurses also communicate effectively with clients, families, and interdisciplinary healthcare providers to promote a safe, effective quality care environment.. 10/93, 11/8/93, 11/11/98, 1/23/02, 03/06; 08/06, 10/26/09; 5/13 6

13 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Page 4 Figure 1. Organization of Curriculum Using Content Concepts Person Baccalaureate Masters PhD Sophomore Junior Senior Self Individual Self Individual Family Self Individual Family Groups Communities Self Individual Family Groups Communities Ethnic Minorities Women Children Older Adults Environment Scope broadens as concept of person expands Nursing Generalists Generalists Generalists Specialist Scientist Health Wellness Wellness Illness Disease Dysfunction Wellness Illness Disease Dysfunction Wellness Illness Disease Dysfunction Wellness/Health Promotion Illness Disease Dysfunction Elimination of Health Disparities 8/91;7/92;11/11/98; 09/05; 03/06; 08/13 7

14 CONCEPT BSN SOPHOMORE LEVEL At the conclusion of the sophomore year the student should: BSN & RN-BSN JUNIOR LEVEL At the conclusion of the junior year, the student should: Student Learning Outcomes BSN & RN-BSN SENIOR MSN & MSN/MBA LEVEL LEVEL At the conclusion of the At the conclusion of the senior year, the student master s program, the should: student should: DNP Level At the conclusion of the DNP program, the student should: PhD LEVEL At the conclusion of the doctoral program, the student should: PERSON Demonstrate awareness of self and individuals in their environment. Demonstrate awareness of self, individuals and families in their environment. Demonstrate awareness of self, individuals, families, groups, and communities in their environment. Analyze knowledge of self, individuals, families, groups, and communities in their environment. Evaluate knowledge of self, individuals, families, groups and communities in their environment. Evaluate knowledge of ethnic minorities, women, children, and older adults. ENVIRONMENT Demonstrate how environment impacts on the health of self and individuals. Demonstrate how the environment impacts the health of individuals and families. Demonstrate how the environment impacts the health of individuals, families, groups, and communities. Appraise the impact of the environment on persons in a variety of settings. Appraise the impact of the environment on the health of individuals, families, groups, and communities. Evaluate the impact of the environment on specific populations NURSING Demonstrate basic nursing concepts and skills as they apply to self and individuals. Demonstrate nursing concepts and skills as they apply to individuals and families. Demonstrate nursing concepts and skills as they apply to individuals, families, groups, and communities. Apply an advanced body of knowledge and skills in nursing management, nursing education, or clinical nursing practice to persons in a variety of settings. Apply an advanced body of knowledge and skills in clinical nursing practice to persons in a variety of settings. Generate nursing knowledge related to health promotion and elimination of health disparities in ethnic minorities, women, children and older adults. HEALTH Demonstrate application of the wellness component of health to self and selected individuals throughout the life span. Demonstrate application of the wellness, illness, disease, and dysfunction components of health to individuals with common physiological and psychosocial problems and to emerging and developing families. Examine the wellness, illness, disease, and dysfunction components of health as they apply to the community of older adults and selected groups and communities. Appraise the influence of the wellness, illness, disease, and dysfunction components of health upon specific target populations of individuals, families, groups, and communities. Appraise the influence of the wellness, illness, disease, and dysfunction components of health upon individuals, families, groups and communities. Promote health and eliminate health disparities in specific populations through research. INQUIRY Demonstrate a beginning knowledge of the inquiry process. Apply the inquiry process to nursing practice. Integrate inquiry into nursing practice. Evaluate applications of the inquiry process to nursing practice. Analyze evidence that may be applied in nursing practice to promote health. Advance knowledge through the inquiry process. 8

15 CARING PRACTICE BSN SOPHOMORE LEVEL Demonstrate art of caring with self and individuals. Practice as a nursing generalist in assessing well individuals across the life span. BSN & RN-BSN JUNIOR LEVEL Apply the art of caring in practice with individuals and families. Practice as a nursing generalist in promoting the well-being of individuals and families. BSN & RN-BSN SENIOR LEVEL Apply the art of caring in practice with individuals, families, groups, and communities. Practice as a nursing generalist in promoting the well-being of individuals, families, groups, and communities. MSN & MSN/MBA LEVEL Demonstrate the art of caring in the specialist s role of nurse educator, nurse manager, or nurse clinician. Practice as a nursing specialist in promoting the well-being of persons in a variety of settings. DNP Level Demonstrate the art of caring in the advanced practice nurse role. Practice as an advanced practice registered nurse to promote the wellbeing of persons in a variety of settings. PhD LEVEL Demonstrate the art of caring in the scientist s role in academia and industry. Practice as a nurse scientist in promoting health and eliminating health disparities in specific populations. 3/13 9

16 Standards of Practice for UNCGSchool of Nursing I The UNCG School of Nursing (SON) uses the following professional nursing standards to guide the curriculum. The SON Conceptual Framework and course learning outcomes are built upon the first set of standards. Additional standards are integrated into the curriculum in selected specialty courses. American Nurses Association. (2010). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). The Research-Focused Doctoral Program in Nursing: Pathways to Excellence. Washington, D.C: Author. American Association of Colleges of Nursing.(2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington, DC: Author. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). Adult-Gerontology Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Competencies. Washington, DC: Author. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2011). The essentials of master's education for advanced practice nursing. Washington, DC: Author. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). Adult-Gerontology Primary Care Nurse Practitioner Competencies. Washington. DC: Author American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). Recommended baccalaureate competencies and curricular guidelines for the nursing care of older adults. Washington, DC: Author American Association of Colleges of Nursing and the John A. Hartford Foundation Institute for Geriatric Nursing. (2000). Older adults: Recommended baccalaureate competencies and 10

17 STANDARDS OF PRACTICE Page 2 curricular guidelines for geriatric nursing care. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists(2010).Scope and Standards for Nurse Anesthesia Practice. Chicago: Author. American Nurses Association. (2001). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Washington DC: American Nurses Publishing. American Nurses Association. (2010). Nursing s social policy statement: The essence of the profession. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing. American Nurses Association. (2005). Pain management nursing: Standards and scope of practice. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Publishing. American Nurses Association.(2008). Pediatric nursing scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Publishing. American Nurses Association. (2007). Public health nursing scope and standards of practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing. American Nurses Association. (2010). Gerontological Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. American Nurses Publishing. American Nurses Association. (2009). Scope and standards for nurse administrators. (3 rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing. American Nurses Association. (2010). Scope and standards of practice for nursing professional development. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing. 11

18 STANDARDS OF PRACTICE Page 3 American Nurses Association and American Psychiatric Nurses Association. (2007). Scope and standards of psychiatric-mental health nursing practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing. APRN Consensus Work Group, & National Council of State Boards of Nursing APRN Advisory Committee. (2008). Consensus model of APRN regulation: Licensure, accreditation, certification, and education. Author. Association of Community Health Nurse Educators. (2009). Essentials of Baccalaureate Nursing Education for Entry Level Community Health Nursing Practice. Association of Community Health Nursing Educators. Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Author. National League for Nursing. (2005). The scope of practice for academic nurse educators. New York: NLN. National Task Force on Quality Nurse Practitioner Education. (2008). Criteria for evaluation of nurse practitioner programs (2 nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Quad Council of Public Health Nursing Organizations.(2007). Public Health Nursing scope and standards of practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing. Quad Council of Public Health Nursing Organizations. (2011).Core competencies for public health nurses competencies. Washington, DC: Author. 7/02; 10/03; 1/04; 7/05; 03/06; 09/08; 08/09; 03/10; 07/10; 09/10;08/11; 8/12; 7/13 12

19 13

20 14

21 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study The Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study reports directly to the Dean. Responsibilities include: 1) Coordinating the recruitment of students for the BSN and RN-BSN programs. 2) Overseeing undergraduate campus and off-campus programs. 3) Advising and counseling prospective students for the BSN program and RN to BSN program. 4) Overseeing undergraduate curricula and programs. 5) Coordinating the awarding of School of Nursing scholarships. 6) Assisting the Dean with fund raising for the School of Nursing. 7) Coordinating School of Nursing Special Exercises. 8) Conducting alumni surveys. 9) Managing the schedule of classes in Banner. 10) Generating data for program approval, evaluation, and accreditation. 11) Assisting the Dean with accreditation and other reports. 12) Overseeing the responsibilities for the Director of Undergraduate Advising and faculty advisors. 13) Assisting the Dean with administrative and faculty recruitment. 14) Managing the budget with the Dean. 15) Representing the School of Nursing at designated University and community functions. 16) Fulfilling other administrative responsibilities as requested by the Dean. 7/96;4/01;7/03, 7/04; 6/10 15

22 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING I Position Description Associate Dean for Graduate Programs The Associate Dean for Graduate Programs reports directly to the Dean. Responsibilities include: 1) Serving as the Director of Graduate Study for the master s program. 2) Recruiting students for the graduate programs. 3) Overseeing campus and off-campus graduate programs. 4) Recommending master s students for admission to the GraduateSchool. 5) Advising and tracking master s students. 6) Coordinating culminating experiences for master s students related to comprehensive examinations, advanced nursing projects, and theses; and approving faculty for projects and theses committees. 7) Recommending students for graduate assistantships and scholarships. 8) Overseeing graduate curricula and programs. 9) Assisting the Dean with administrative and faculty recruitment. 10) Conducting the end of program surveys. 11) Providing administrative oversight for the implementation of the School s Evaluation Plan. 12) Generating data for program approval, evaluation, and accreditation. 13) Assisting the Dean with accreditation and other reports. 14) Overseeing the responsibilities of the program assistants, instructional technology consultant, hardware analyst, and instructional technology specialist/webmaster. 15) Coordinating information technology activities for the School of Nursing. 16) Overseeing website development for the School of Nursing. 17) Fulfilling other administrative responsibilities as requested by the Dean. 16

23 7/96;4/97;4/01;6/18/02;6/03; 7/04; 6/05; 7/07; 03/08 I THEUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Associate Dean for Research The Associate Dean for Research reports directly to the Dean. Responsibilities include: 1) Provides leadership for research/scholarly activities within the School. 2) Coordinates and assists with development of research and scholarly activity resources within the School. 3) Collaborates with faculty to develop and implement research programs. 4) Mentors junior faculty in nurse scientist role. 5) Assists faculty and staff with contract and grant applications pre-award. 6) Assists faculty and staff with contract and grant management post-award. 7) Assists faculty, students and staff with planning and conducting research and scholarly activities. 8) Assists faculty, students and staff with dissemination efforts. 9) Collaborates with the IRB representative and Research and Scholarship committee to enhance guidelines and policies and procedures for research/scholarly activities within the School. 10) Provides collaborative/consultative assistance and communication with campus Offices of Sponsored Programs and Contracts and Grants, other institutes, centers, departments, and Associate Provost for Research, as well as funding agencies, foundations and organizations. 11) Collaborates with and supervises the administrative assistant in the SON Research Office. 12) Assist with training and supervision of research assistants. 4/02 17

24 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Director BSN/MSN Outreach Programs: Hickory, NC I The Director of the BSN/MSN Outreach Programs: Hickory, NC reports to the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Study. Responsibilities include: 1) Assists the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Study with development and management of budgets for both programs. 2) Coordinates undergraduate and graduate curricula advising and acts as a liaison with Academic Advising. 3) Recruits students for both programs and acts as a liaison with the Undergraduate Office of Admissions and the GraduateSchool. 4) Completes registration for all students, acts as liaison to the Registrar's Office, and submits final course grades. 5) Generates data for reports related to students and enrollment. 6) Implements both programs consistent with on-campus offerings. 7) Provides support to teaching faculty as needed to implement curriculum. 8) Monitors progression of students and consults with faculty, the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Study andthe Associate Dean for Graduate Study as needed. 9) Serves as liaison to health care agencies in which students have clinical practicum experiences, checks for currency of clinical agreements for student placement and maintain current file of preceptor vitae. 10) Teaches in programs as warranted. 11) Maintains copies of all program materials for files. 12) Reviews library holdings at Outreach Programs site and orders books and journals to support program needs. 6/03; 12/11 18

25 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Department Chair Department Chairs are administratively responsible for faculty assigned to their department. The faculty report to the Department Chair, and the Department Chair reports directly to the Dean. In addition to the administrative responsibilities, Department Chairs have teaching assignments. Appointment is a tenure track appointment at the rank of Associate Professor or Professor, for a four-year term. The following outlines the responsibilities of Department Chairs: 1) Consults with the Dean regarding School of Nursing operations. 2) Administratively represents the School in the Dean's absence as designated. 3) Represents department faculty on the Administrative Advisory Council. 4) Recommends faculty teaching assignments to the Dean and coordinates the fall and spring class schedule. 5) Assures faculty coverage for courses. 6) Drafts committee assignments according to the bylaws and makes recommendations to the Dean. 7) Assists faculty performance and assists faculty with issues. 8) Conducts faculty evaluations. 9) Recommends faculty merit increases to the Dean. 10) Allocates faculty travel and funding, and makes recommendations to the Dean. 11) Generating data for program approval, evaluation, and accreditation. 12) Other tasks as assigned by the Dean. 6/96;4/01; 6/05 19

26 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Director of the PhD Program in Nursing The Director of the PhD Program reports directly to the Dean. Responsibilities include: 1) Serving as the Director of Graduate Study for the PhD Program. 2) Managing research assistantship selection and appointment process and other forms of funding awards for PhD students. 3) Advising prospective and enrolled PhD in nursing students. 4) Evaluating the PhD in nursing curriculum in consultation with faculty, the PhD Council, and the Curriculum Committee. 5) Monitoring course evaluations and managing data collection to support evaluation of the PhD program. 6) Projecting course enrollments and student progression for school. 7) Establishing the agenda for the PhD Council during the academic year. 8) Designing and implementing periodic seminars for PhD faculty and students. 9) Recommending faculty teaching assignments for PhD courses to department chairs. 10) Assisting faculty with the placement of PhD students for independent research and role experiences. 11) Mentoring PhD students and faculty in scholarly role development. 12) Assisting and supporting faculty in teaching of PhD courses, supervising research, and managing student issues and concerns. 13) Overseeing the PhD student progression activities including appointment of advisory/dissertation committees, plans of study, preliminary examinations, proposal defenses, and dissertation defenses. 14) Coordinating the visit of consultants for the PhD program. 15) Participating in grant funded initiatives for the PhD program as appropriate. 16) Providing systematic communication with Dean of the GraduateSchool and the Dean of the School of Nursing on program related issues. 17) Maintaining a record of research and scholarly activities. 4/25/05; 7/07 20

27 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Instructional Technology Consultant The Instructional Technology Consultant reports directly to the Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study. Responsibilities include: 1) Provides Blackboard course management assistance and education. 1) Assists faculty with teaching software needs/support that relate to Blackboard and distance education. 3) Educates faculty regarding the use and application of classroom equipment e.g. teaching stations. 4) Reviews and evaluates proposed software. 5) Assists faculty with technological enhancements of national presentations. 6) Serves as Liaison with TLC for technological productions and posters. 7) Assists faculty with videotaping. 8) Provides expert advice, instructional design, and development services to faculty using instructional technology in their teaching. 9) Assists faculty in the production of web-based distance education. 10) Educates students in the use of Blackboard and other software applications. 3/02; 7/04 21

28 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Instructional Technology Specialist/Webmaster The Instructional Technology Specialist/Webmaster reports to the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs. Responsibilities include: 1) Website design and development. 2) Compliance with ADA requirements for computer access. 3) Network and workstation security for the School of Nursing. 4) Management of mobile and wireless computing. 5) Development of web based applications. 6) Oversight of computer inventory for the School of Nursing. 7) Recommendation of specifications for purchases of all computers, printers, kiosks, mobile and network devices, and appropriate software. 8) Management of directory interfaces. 9) Collaboration with ITC and hardware analyst in the School of Nursing and campus IT staff. 03/08 22

29 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Hardware Technology Consultant The Hardware Technology Consultant reports directly to the Associate Dean for Graduate Study. Responsibilities include: 1) Assessing needs in the School of Nursing for desktop and laptop computers and related hardware and software for faculty and staff use. 2) Developing specifications for hardware and software orders in compliance with University supported products. 3) Installing new hardware and images for faculty and staff. 4) Preparing outdated hardware for surplus or transfer. 5) Assisting faculty and staff with resolution of problems related to hardware or installation of software. 6) Designing School of Nursing website in compliance with ADA standards. 7) Attending campus wide meetings related to hardware technology. 8) Providing hardware service as needed to faculty and staff located in multiple locations including four campus buildings, the WFUBMC School of Nurse Anesthesia, the RSNA, and the Hickory Outreach site. 9) Attending hardware technology workshops to continually update knowledge and skills. 7/06/05 23

30 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Director of Undergraduate Advising The Director of Undergraduate Advising reports directly to the Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study and has the following responsibilities: 1) Advises current and prospective students for the pre-licensure BSN, Second Degree, and RN/BSN programs 2) Assists with freshmen advising sessions, SOAR, and Rolling Advising for transfer students 3) Coordinates faculty advising assignments and serves as a resource for faculty during advising 4) Prepares Upper Division applications and folders for the Student Admission, Progression, and Appeals Committee (including GPA calculations and updated audits) 5) Creates and mails letters and packets regarding the admission decisions to all Upper Division applicants 6) Maintains records for all undergraduate Nursing students and updates audits 7) Maintains alumni records for graduate and undergraduate Nursing programs 8) Maintains all graduate and undergraduate historical course files and all historical grade and test files 9) Verifies immunizations and CPR certifications for Upper Division and RN/BSN students and notifies clinical faculty of incomplete or expired requirements 10) Receives Grade Sheets and incomplete/grade change forms and creates grade report for the Associate Deans 11) Coordinates RN/BSN Special Exams (three per semester) 12) Receives completed CNA I and CNA II forms from students, verifies information, and gives to the secretary for theassociate Dean for Undergraduate Study for processing 5/03 13) Provides reports and data to Dean, Associate Deans, and faculty as needed. 24

31 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Statistician/Biostatistician The Statistician/Biostatistician reports directly to the Director of Research. Responsibilities include: 1) Teaches graduate statistical courses in School of Nursing 2) Provides statistical consultation in research design, analysis, and grant writing for School faculty research projects. 3) Serves as a statistical resource for graduate nursing student theses and dissertations. 4) Participates in evaluation of and instruction in statistical analysis software for School and University. 7/19/05 25

32 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Course Chair Course Chairs coordinate all aspects of the course and the work of all faculty teaching in the course. Course Chairs report directly to respective Department Chairs. Responsibilities are as follows: 1) Prepares all course materials. 2) Oversees the student evaluation process including collecting test items, forwarding the material to secretary, arranging for proofreading, administering the exam, grading the exam, disseminating the results and arranging test review. This also includes NLN exams or computer-assisted tests, if applicable. Also, collects and forwards clinical evaluations of student performance to the Office of Undergraduate Advising. 3) Maintains course grades and shares unsatisfactory performance of students with the Department Chairs. 4) Maintains the official class roster, submitting unsatisfactory progress reports and final course grades to the Office of the Registrar. 5) Assures that students having difficulty meeting course requirements are advised. 6) Prepares the attendance record, checks the roll on a regular basis for unexcused absences and keeps the Department Chair informed of excessive absences in the course. 7) Orders course textbooks designated by course faculty and orders desk copies for course faculty. 8) Coordinates the compilation and delivery of library reserve reading list for the course. 9) Provides a copy of course syllabus for the file. 10) Assists the course faculty as needed in reviewing, revising, and organizing the course as needed within the framework of the curriculum and addresses any concerns or problems identified by faculty or students. Input into this process would include any student and/or faculty evaluations of the course. 26

33 POSITION DESCRIPTION COURSE CHAIR Page 2 11) Assumes responsibility for student evaluations of the course. Keeps these evaluations on file for four years in the Course Chair s office. 12) Facilitates orientation of new faculty to all aspects of the course. 13) Secures preceptors for students when indicated by course requirements. 14) Checks for currency of clinical agreements for student placement. 15) Coordinates overall planning of clinical placements. 16) Submits completed Clinical Assignment Forms or Clinical Assignment Forms for Students with Preceptors to the appropriate faculty liaisons and the Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study s office by the end of the first full week of each clinical rotation. (These forms are available in Room 101 or forms with the same information may be generated by computer.) 17) Calls and presides over faculty group course meetings. 18) Submits completed agency evaluations to Department Chair. Agency evaluation will be on file in Dean's office. 19) Monitor content and strategies for courses designated as speaking intensive, writing intensive, and global marker courses. 4/94 revised 5/97; 2/03 27

34 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Class Advisor The purpose of the Class Advisor is to coordinate functions of and communication within the assigned nursing class, and to serve as an advocate for concerns of the class. There are four different Class Advisors within the School of Nursing: the Sophomore Level Advisor; Junior Level Advisor; Senior Level Advisor; and RN-BSN Advisor. Responsibilities are as follows: 1. Coordinate communication among members of the assigned class level. 2. Serve as resource and source of information for the assigned class level. 3. Function as advocate for concerns of the assigned class level. 4. Assist with recruiting student members to serve on the Dean s Student Advisory Committee and School of Nursing committees from within the class level. 5. Assist assigned class with scheduling and holding class meetings and meetings of class officers. 6. The Junior Level Advisor coordinates election of class officers by the junior class, and works with the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Study to recruit Junior Marshals for Special Exercises. 7. The Senior Level Advisor and RN-BSN Advisors coordinate selection of the class speakers for Special Exercises and having the photograph made of the graduating BSN and RN-BSN students. 8. The Senior Level Advisor and RN-BSN Advisors assist with lining the assigned classes up for Special Exercises, and serve as part of the platform party at Special Exercises to assist with pinning the graduating students. 9. The Senior Level Advisor works with the School of Nursing Development Officer to assist the senior class with selection of a class gift, if the senior class chooses to make a gift. 10. The RN-BSN Advisor convenes faculty teaching RN-BSN courses to discuss issues related to these students or this plan to study. The RN-BSN Advisor may forward recommendations from these faculty to BSN Council as necessary. 11. Class advisors may also assist with coordination of fundraisers, service projects, or other activities that the class elects to conduct. Assignment of Role: 1. The Sophomore Level Advisor is appointed by the Dean, and becomes the Junior Level Advisor, and then the Senior Level Advisor, as the class matriculates. Thus, the appointment is for a three-year term. 2. The RN-BSN is appointed by the Dean for a three-year term. 3. In the event of a vacancy in the position of Class Advisor, a replacement will be appointed by the Dean to complete the remainder of the term. 09/20/11 28

35 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Honors Liaison/Advisor The School of Nursing s Honors Liaison to the Lloyd International Honors College (LIHC) serves to facilitate communication between the School and the LIHC as well as serving as the School s representative on the Honors Council. The Honors Council is the curriculum committee and policy advisory board for Lloyd International Honors College and also serves the University as the committee for choosing the winners of the Student Excellence Awards. The School of Nursing Honors Advisor coordinates Honors related communication within the School of Nursing. LIHC offers comprehensive advising for all Honors students. LIHC Honors Advisers, along with departmental Honors Faculty Liaisons / Advisors, work in concert with students regular academic advisers to facilitate student understanding and completion of International Honors, Disciplinary Honors or both International and Disciplinary Honors resulting in Full University Honors. Responsibilities of the Honors Liaison/Advisor are as follows: 1. Coordinate communication between the Honors College, students and faculty members working on honors contracts and/or senior independent study projects [Senior honors projects: HSS490, NUR493, Undergraduate Research Assistantships (URAs)]. 2. Serve as resource and source of information regarding honors for undergraduate students and School of Nursing faculty. 3. Function as advocate for concerns of students working on honors contracts. 4. Function as an advocate for concerns of students and faculty working on honors projects. 5. Recruit new disciplinary honors students (BSN and RN-BSN). Present information about Honors at May Reading Day new junior orientation and August new junior Cone Health System orientation as well as Class Blackboard (Bb) communication. Assignment of Role: 1. The Honors Liaison is appointed by the Dean for a three year (renewable) term, and becomes the School s representative on the Honors Council. 2. The Honors Advisor is appointed by the Dean. 12/20/11 29

36 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description Lab Coordinator The purpose of the Lab Coordinator is to coordinate functions of and communication within the undergraduate nursing labs NUR 210 and 220, and to represent issues related to laboratory courses on the School of Nursing Learning Resources Committee. Responsibilities of Lab Coordinator are as follows: 1. Order lab supplies the semester prior to use and as needed for courses 2. Participate as a member in the Learning Resources Committee to report on lab needs and equipment need to purchase or repair 3. Coordinate teaching by lab faculty each semester for N210, N220 by holding orientation meeting before the semester starts. Order course textbooks for faculty as needed 4. Write or update weekly instructor guidesto ensure consistentency between lab sections in instruction of students 5. Set up lab equipment and supplies needed for each lab prior to the first lab of the week 6. Enhance active learning in lab by writing patient scenarios incorporating skills at the bedside that students will demonstrate for instructor checkoff 7. Communicate with lab instructors as needed to enhance consistency or to emphasize content to cover in lab sections 8. Post lab assignments on Blackboard for students to complete prior to lab experiences Assignment of Role: The Lab Coordinator is appointed by the Dean for a one year term, which may be renewed. 12/20/11 30

37 I THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Position Description OSHA Trainer The purpose of the OSHA Trainer is to coordinate OSHA Training for faculty and employees in the School, and to coordinate functions required by the UNCG Office of Safety. Responsibilities are as follows: OSHA Trainer UNCG School of Nursing 1. Communicate regularly with the UNCG Office of Safety a. Initial training required b. Training updates as scheduled c. Submit required signed rosters of completed training d. Submit required Hepatitis B Acceptance and Declination Forms 2. Arrange for immunization series at Gove Student Health Center for faculty and student employees who accept the Hepatitis B series. Records kept per requirements of the Office of Safety 3. Develop yearly OSHA training and testing for the School of Nursing according to the guidelines of UNCG Office of Safety and OSHA 4. Ensure all required faculty and staff in the School of Nursing receive yearly training in a timely manner (as per list of requirements on Office of Safety website). 5. Obtain list of new faculty hires from School of Nursing Administrative Assistant. 6. Obtain list of new employees who need training from Director of Research. 7. Update the PP presentation on Bloodborne pathogens for undergraduate senior nursing students in clinical courses. (Generic & RN to BSN). 8. Maintain communication with Gove Student Health Center, which is the preferred primary care provider for faculty and student employees. 9. Maintain a list of any faculty or student employee blood borne pathogen exposures in the School of Nursing 10. Maintain a list of any student exposures in the School of Nursing (this is not for reporting purposes but for QA examination). 11. Periodically check storage of Biohazard wastes in the SON. 12. Make certain hazardous waste is properly prepared for pick up by Stericycle; Administrative Assistant notifies OSHA Trainer of the schedule. Assignment of Role: The OSHA Trainer is appointed by the Dean for a three year term, which may be renewed. 12/20/11 31

38 PART II BYLAWS & COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS 32

39 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING BYLAWS ARTICLE I THE FACULTY The Constitution of the Faculty at UNCG can be found at: SECTION 1: STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY The responsibility of the Faculty in the operation of the School of Nursing is in accordance with the Instrument of Government of the University. The authority of the Faculty comes from Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution of the Faculty. (Rev.4/2/03) SECTION 2: PURPOSE To assure that the Faculty shall have the capacity to carry out decisions with the full recognition that the Dean of the School of Nursing has the ultimate responsibility and authority for administrative action. SECTION 3: FUNCTIONS The functions of the Faculty shall be: a. to be the legislative body for the School of Nursing. b. to maintain and promote high educational standards for the School of Nursing. c. to take action on recommendations from the School of Nursing Committees. d. to delegate appropriate responsibilities to standing and ad hoc committees. SECTION 4: MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING PRIVILEGE a. The membership of the Faculty shall consist of all: 1. full-time faculty members 33

40 ARTICLE I Page 2 2. part-time faculty members 3. adjunct faculty members 4. joint appointment faculty members b. All members, except adjunct faculty, shall have voting privileges unless otherwise specified in these Bylaws. Adjunct faculty with full-time or significant teaching responsibilities shall have voting privileges. SECTION 5: MEETINGS AND PROCEDURES a. The Faculty will assemble at least once a semester. Special meetings may be called at the discretion of the Dean. b. The Dean shall serve as presiding officer at Faculty meetings. In the absence of the Dean a member designated by the Dean may preside. c. At Faculty meetings a quorum will consist of members present. There will be no absentee or proxy voting unless otherwise specified in the election procedure. d. Any matter may be included on the agenda at the request of a member of the Faculty. e. Robert's Rule of Order, Newly Revised shall be observed in the conduct of Faculty meetings. f. Proposals dealing with curriculum, policy or Bylaw matters may be voted on only at regular scheduled Plenary Faculty meetings. 1. The faculty shall vote on such matters provided that the proposals have been presented in writing to the members at least fifteen days prior to the meeting. 2. Other matters, such as procedure, may be voted on at the time of introduction. SECTION 6: STANDING COMMITTEES a. The faculty of the School of Nursing shall delegate appropriate responsibilities to Standing Committees. Standing Committees are responsible to the Faculty. b. Overview of Committees 1. Standing Committees and Ad Hoc Committees The faculty or any permanent program or subgroup may establish Standing Committees or Ad Hoc Committees with the consent of its members. Unless otherwise specified in these Bylaws, committees will function in accordance to the following protocol: 34

41 ARTICLE I Page 3 i. Delineate purpose and functions. ii. Delineate membership including how selected, criteria for membership, and term of office. iii. Ex officio members (a) are members of committee by virtue of their position and have full voting privilege unless otherwise specified. (b) may not serve as recorders or preside. (c) count as members present to make a quorum. iv. Membership (a) Members may be reappointed or reelected to committees unless otherwise specified in the committee description. (b) Unfinished terms will be filled by appointment by the By- Laws and Election Committee unless otherwise specified in the committee description. (c) Faculty members are not eligible to serve in more than two elected positions within the School of Nursing. v. Voting (a) Voting items must be distributed at least 7 days prior to scheduled vote. (b) Voting shall be by simple plurality. 2. Functions of Chairman i. Prepare agenda. ii. Preside at meetings -- with vote in case of tie. iii. Declare a quorum. iv. Appoint a recorder for each meeting. v. Call meetings as necessary. vi. Prepare an annual report of committee activities to be submitted at the end of the academic year. vii. Submit recommended committee changes to Bylaws and Election Committee. 3. Functions of Recorder i. Prepare a written record of the activities of the meeting. ii. List members present and absent. iii. List ex officio, ad hoc members and guests. iv. Name chairman and person presiding if chairman is absent. v. Date, time and place of meeting vi. Items of business (a) All main motions including person making motion and final decision. 35

42 ARTICLE I Page 4 vii. viii. (b) Any schedules developed (c) A synopsis of the work of the meeting Date, time and place of next meeting Name of recorder 4. Quorum Unless otherwise specified in committee descriptions, a quorum shall consist of one-third (1/3) of the members of the committee. 5. Distribution of Minutes 6. Meeting Unless otherwise specified--all members, regular and ex officio, and the Dean's office will receive minutes. Committees shall meet as appropriate, but at least once each semesterunless otherwise specified. c. The Standing Committees of the Faculty shall be: BSN Council Bylaws and Elections Curriculum Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Evaluation Learning Resources MSN Council PhD Council Promotion, Tenure, Reappointment and Post-Tenure Review Research and Scholarship Committee Scholarship Student Admissions, Progression, and Appeals Committee Student Recruitment and Orientation Teaching Excellence Award Committee d. Standing Committee Descriptions and Functions: See list as above. 36

43 ARTICLE I Page 5 SECTION 7: AD HOC COMMITTEES The Dean, the Faculty, or any subgroup of the Faculty of the School of Nursing may develop such Ad Hoc Committees as necessary to fulfill its functions. Such committees are responsible to their founding bodies. SECTION 8: ELECTION AND APPOINTMENT TO UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES Faculty members of the School of Nursing participate in the activities of the greater University as delineated in the Handbook for Faculty. The School of Nursing has elected representation on the Faculty Senate as specified in the Faculty Constitution. School of Nursing faculty members also serve on appointed University committees in accordance with the Faculty Senate Committee Structure. Appointments are made by the Dean, in consultation with the Administrative Advisory Council. Vacancies in elected positions, due to faculty withdrawing from an office or position, shall be filled by special election under the terms of the election bylaws. Said election should be held within 60 days of the position vacancy. Vacancies in appointed positions shall be filled by the Dean. 7/92;4/99;1/24/02;7/03; 4/05; 10/09 37

44 ARTICLE II ADMINISTRATION II SECTION 1: THE DEAN a. The responsibility and authority of the Dean of the School of Nursing is delegated in direct line from the Board of Governors and the President of the University of North Carolina through the Chancellor and Provost of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. b. The Dean: 1. The chief nurse administrator is a registered nurse; holds a graduate degree in nursing; and is academically and experientially qualified to accomplish the mission, goals and expected student and faculty outcomes. 2. is the chief administrative officer of the School of Nursing and as such is the final authority and has final responsibility in all matters relative to the functioning of the School of Nursing. 3. is Chairman of the Faculty. 4. is responsible for the fiscal operation of the School of Nursing. 5. interprets the School of Nursing within the University structure and to the public. 6. is a member of the Faculty with full privileges. SECTION 2: THE ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDY, ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF GRADUATE STUDY, AND ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR RESEARCH a. Derive authority and responsibility on matters delegated by the Dean. b. Have the responsibility for research, academic and student affairs at the undergraduate and graduate level. c. Are members of the Faculty with full responsibilities. SECTION 3: THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE DEAN Functions as an administrative assistant to the Dean on matters delegated by the Dean. SECTION 4: ADMINISTRATIVE ADVISORY COUNCIL a. The purpose of the Administrative Advisory Council is to advise and support the Dean in administrative decisions. b. Duties and Responsibilities: 1. The Administrative Advisory Council serves as the Committee on Committees for the School of Nursing. 38

45 ARTICLE II Page 2 2. The Administrative Advisory Council shall serve asa deliberative body to advise the Dean on those matters presented for consideration and to take action upon any matter presented when such action is appropriate. c. Membership: 1. The Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study 2. The Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study 3. The Associate Dean for Research 4. Department Chairs--Adult Health, Parent-Child and Community Practice Nursing 5. Director of Outreach 6. Chair BSN Council 7. Chair MSN Council 8. Chair PhD Council 9. Director of Development 10. Director of the Doctoral Program(Revised 7/96;7/02; 7/05; 7/07/) d. Meetings: The meetings shall be scheduled at the discretion of the Dean. SECTION 5: STUDENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE a. The purpose of the Student Advisory Committee is to provide direct communication between the Dean and the student body of the School of Nursing. b. Duties and Responsibilities: 1. To meet with their constituency to ascertain concerns and opinions. 2. To initiate requests for a meeting as necessary. 3. To communicate the deliberations of the Committee to their constituency. c. Membership: Student Advisory Committee i. Junior Class President ii. Senior Class President iii. ANS President iv. RN-BSN Representative v. Representatives of each MSN Concentration vi. Representative of the Doctoral Program vii. President Multicultural Nursing Student Association viii. President Nurses Christian Fellowship ix. President Chi Eta Phi x. President Health and Social Justice xi. Others as designated by the Dean Rev.7/92;6/94;7/96;4/01;7/02;7/03; 4/05; 7/08; 06/09 39

46 II ARTICLE III NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS SECTION 1: RESPONSIBILITIES A. BYLAWS AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE a. To keep a record of all elected positions on School of Nursing Committees and elected representation on University Committees, including: 1. Current holder of position 2. Date elected 3. Term of election 4. Criteria for nomination b. Notify faculty of positions on School of Nursing and University Committees to be filled by election including: 1. Position description 2. Criteria for nomination. 3. Current holder of position 4. List of eligible faculty 5. Voting privilege. c. Receive nominations of qualified consenting candidates for University Committee representation submitted in writing and from the floor at a designated meeting of the plenary faculty. d. Prepare a slate for University Committee representation to the faculty from nominations that meet all criteria. e. Distribute the final slate for University Committee representation to the faculty by electronic ballot if feasible or written ballot. f. Receive reports of election results for School of Nursing Committees from Department Chairs and University Committee representation from electronic ballot, or from tellers in the event of written ballots. g. Present written reports on election outcomes to the Dean. B. DEPARTMENT CHAIRS a. Receive nominations of qualified consenting candidates for department representation to School of Nursing Committees at first department meeting in fall semester. 40

47 ARTICLE III Page 2 b. Distribute a slate for department representation to School of Nursing Committeesat second department meeting in fall semester. c. Present written report on election outcomes to the Chair of the Bylaws and Elections Committee. SECTION 2: NOMINATIONSFORUNIVERSITY COMMITTEE REPRESENTATION a. Nominations may be initiated by any faculty member with voting privilege, as stated in these Bylaws. b. Two members of the Faculty of the School, who must sign the nomination form, must support the candidate s written nomination. c. The candidate must also give written consent to run for office. d. Nominations must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Bylaws and Elections Committee. e. Nominations made from the floor during a designated meeting of the Faculty of the School must meet criteria in these Bylaws. f. Nominations are closed by the Dean at the designated meeting of the Faculty of the School. SECTION 3: ELECTIONSFORUNIVERSITY COMMITTEE REPRESENTATION a. When possible, voting in an election shall be by anonymous electronic ballot. If electronic voting is not feasible for an election, a written ballot shall be used. b. There shall be 7 designated days for voting to occur. c. Election results will be announced by the Dean. d. Elections shall be by simple plurality unless otherwise specified in these Bylaws. e. In case of a tie, a run-off election will be held under the above terms within 30 days of the report of a tie vote. f. Vacancies in elected positionsfor University Committee representation shall be filled by special election under the above terms. The special election should be held within 60 days of the position vacancy. 41

48 ARTICLE III Page 3 SECTION 4: WRITTEN BALLOTSFORUNIVERSITY COMMITTEE REPRESENTATION a. The Dean shall appoint 3 tellers to review the printout of electronic voting results or to count written ballots. b. The tellers shall submit a written report of election results to the Chair of the Bylaws and Elections Committee on the designated final day of voting. c. Written ballots shall be kept for one week after conclusion of the election. 7/93;4/15/00; 4/05 42

49 II ARTICLE IV AMENDMENTS SECTION 1: AMENDMENTS These Bylaws may be amended at any plenary faculty meeting by a 2/3 majority vote of members present. Suggestions for amendments should be referred to the Bylaws and Elections Committee for study. Recommendations for amendment must be presented to the Faculty in writing at least 15 days prior to the faculty meeting at which scheduled vote will occur. SECTION 2: SUSPENSION OF BYLAWS These Bylaws may be suspended at any regular faculty meeting for a procedural modification by a 90% vote of members present. Adopted 1978 Amended Spring 1992 Amended Spring 1993 Amended Spring

50 II APPENDIX TO BYLAWS STANDING COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS BSN Council Bylaws and Elections Curriculum Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Evaluation Learning Resources MSN Council PhD Council Promotion, Tenure, Reappointment and Post-Tenure Review Research and Scholarship Committee Scholarship Student Admissions, Progression, and Appeals Committee Student Recruitment and Orientation Teaching Excellence Award Committee (rev.4-91);8/91;7/92;4/94;8/94;5/95;5/97;4/98;4/99;1/23/02; 4/05/; 7/07; 3/08; 10/09 44

51 II BSN Council A. Purpose: B. Functions: To implement the educational objectives of the Baccalaureate Program in nursing. 1. Insure communication among all levels and departments of the organizational structure responsible for the Baccalaureate Program. 2. Provide a forum for the discussion of issues affe4cting the Baccalaureate Program. 3. Implement the curriculum and policies of the Baccalaureate Program. 4. Make recommendations relating to curriculum and policy affecting the Baccalaureate Program to the appropriate committee for study. C. Membership: 1. All School of Nursing Faculty teaching in the Baccalaureate Program. A Faculty's term as member shall coincide with teaching responsibilities at the baccalaureate level. 2. Chair, elected by the membership for a two year term. 3. Chair-elect to be elected at the last spring meeting of the Chair's first year in office. 4. Dean/Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study - Ex-officio D. Chairperson: 1. Chair, elected by the membership for a two year term. 2. Chair-elect to be elected at the last spring meeting of the Chair s first year in office. E. Meetings: 1. Meetings shall be called at the discretion of the chair. 2. A one week written notice is required for voting items. 3. A quorum shall consist of members present (not to be less than 10 in number) providing all class levels of the BSN program are represented. 4. Minutes will be distributed to all members and to the Dean. 7/92;2/95;4/01; 4/05; 10/07; 1/08 45

52 II BYLAWS AND ELECTIONS COMMITTEE A. Purpose: 1. To review the Bylaws annually and make recommendations to the faculty for appropriate amendments. 2. To act as a committee on elections for the School of Nursing. B. Functions: 1. Conduct an annual review of the Bylaws of the School of Nursing to maintain agreement with the Instruments of Government (i.e. the constitution of the faculty and UNCG policies). 2. Recommend amendments to the Bylaws as necessary. 3. Oversee elections of faculty representation on School of Nursing Committees. 4. Conduct elections for faculty representation on University Committees in accordance with the Bylaws for Nominations and Elections. 5. Maintain records of elected positions on School of Nursing and University Committees. C. Membership: One faculty member appointed by the Dean for a two year term, plus the elected Chairperson. D. Chairperson: 1. Elected by the faculty for a two-year term. 2. Tenured, with at least two years with the School of Nursing. 3. Special functions: Serve as the School of Nursing representative on the University Committee on Committees. E. Meetings: 1. Called as needed by chairperson or other member. 2. Minutes distributed to members and the Dean. 7/93;4/15/99;4/02; 6/05, 1/08 46

53 II CURRICULUM COMMITTEE A. Purpose: To systematically review the School of Nursing curricula and make recommendations to the faculty on curricular matters. B. Functions: 1. Develop short- and long-term curricular plans. 2. Investigate and review recommendations for new curricular offerings. 3. Review revisions and modifications to current courses for which substantial changes are proposed. 4. Review actions from other bodies which affect the School of Nursing curricula. 5. Report on committee activities to the faculty. 6. Recommend actions on curricular and related policy proposals to the faculty. 7. Evaluate the curricula using a systematic plan on a four-year cycle. 8 Interface with the UNCG Undergraduate Curriculum Committee and the Graduate Studies Committee as appropriate. C. Membership: 1. Criteria a. Three elected faculty (one from each department). b. Up to 5 additional faculty appointed by the Dean in order to achieve programmatic balance (three faculty with primary teaching responsibilities in undergraduate programs, three faculty with primary teaching responsibilities in graduate programs and one representative from each department. c. The School of Nursing representatives to the UNCG Undergraduate Curriculum Committee and the Graduate Studies Committee. The School of Nursing representatives to the UNCG Undergraduate Curriculum Committee and Graduate Study Committee are not eligible to be departmental representatives. d. Up to three additional non-faculty members appointed by the Dean (one alumnus, one School of Nursing Advisory Board member, and one nurse from an affiliating clinical agency). e. Two undergraduate students (one junior and one senior) selected by their classmates and approved by the Dean. f. Two graduate students (one masters and one doctoral) appointed by the Dean. 47

54 CURRICULUM COMMITTEE Page 2 2. Terms D. Chairperson: g. Ex officio: Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study, Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study, and Director of Doctoral program. a. All elected faculty positions will be for two-year terms staggered for continuity. The Community Practice and Parent-Child Nursing Departments elect representatives to begin terms in the even years; the Adult Health Department elects a representative to begin a term in the odd years. b. All appointed faculty and non-faculty positions are for one year. c. Student representatives are appointed for terms commensurate with availability and interest. 1. Elected by committee for a one year term. 2. A chair-elect is elected annually at the first meeting in the fall semester from all full-time faculty committee members who will continue or who are willing to be appointed to continue the following year. The chair-elect serves as Chair the following year. E. Meetings: 1. The committee meets at least once per semester. 2. Quorum: A quorum for the committee is one-half the membership, with no fewer than five faculty members. 3. Minutes will be distributed to members and to the Dean 7/92;1/95;4/96;4/97;4/01;6/03;3/04; 4/05; 3/06, 1/08; 10/09 48

55 II A. Purpose: EQUITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION COMMITTEE 1. To enhance the School of Nursing s ability to be an equitable and inclusive environment in which faculty, staff and students thrive. 2. To serve as a resource/liaison within the School of Nursing as well as between the School and the University on matters pertaining to equity, diversity and inclusion. B. Functions: 1. To promote an inclusive environment that affirms the diversity of faculty, staff and students by offering equal access and opportunity to all School of Nursing community members. 2. To provide educational opportunities about critical issues pertaining to equity, diversity and inclusion, and encourage the application of inclusive practices. 3. To promote diversity in educational programs, faculty and student recruitment, and research development. 4. To recommend recognition of outstanding achievements related to equity, diversity and inclusion in teaching, research and service to the School of Nursing and the larger community. C. Membership: 1. Committee members are appointed by the Dean for a two-year term. 2. Five faculty members with representation from each of the Departments. Appointments will be staggered to provide continuity. 3. One staff member. 4. Three student representatives: One junior level baccalaureate One senior level baccalaureate One graduate level D. Chairperson: 1. The chair of the committee will be appointed by the Dean for a two-year term. E. Meetings: 1. Meetings will be held as necessary to complete the assigned tasks of the committee. 2. Minutes will be distributed to the members and to the Dean. Race & Gender -8/94; 4/97; 4/01; 1/08 EDI 10/09 II 49

56 EVALUATION COMMITTEE A. Purpose: To plan and promote systematic program evaluation. Program components include mission and administrative capacity, faculty and staff, students, curriculum, resources, and outcomes. B. Functions: 1. To develop systematic program evaluation plan. 2. To oversee the implementation of the plan. 3. To review/evaluate the plan annually. C. Membership: 1. Criteria: Appointed by the Dean to include the following members: a. Faculty: At least five faculty members, to include a representative from each department and a representative from each program. The Associate Dean for Graduate Programs will also be a member. b. Advisory Board: One representative c. Students: One junior level baccalaureate student One senior level baccalaureate student A minimum of one graduate student 2. Term a. Faculty members appointed for three years; terms staggered for continuity. D. Chairperson: 1. Appointed by the Dean 2 Term: A maximum of two consecutive years. E. Meetings: 1. At least once per semester and as needed. 2. A quorum shall consist of one-third of the members of the committee. 3. Minutes will be distributed to the members and to the Dean 7/92; 3/95; 4/99; 4/01; 4/02; 6/03; 3/04; 7/05; 1/08; 11/09; 9/11; 10/12 II 50

57 LEARNING RESOURCES COMMITTEE A. Purposes: 1. To act in all matters pertaining to the acquisition, circulation and utilization of library materials. 2. To serve as a resource/liaison, within the School of Nursing as well as between the School and the Walter Clinton Jackson Library, on matters pertaining to books, serials, and other Library materials. 3. To serve as a resource/liaison, within the School of Nursing as well as between the School and the Faculty Teaching and Learning Commons Committee. 4. To encourage and facilitate the utilization of learning resources. B. Functions: 1. Clarify library updates for faculty and students. 2. Receive and act upon faculty/student requisitions for books, serials, library resource materials and software needs. 3. Assess volume of need for new acquisitions and have input into budgetary requests for library resources for the School of Nursing. 4. Review printed brochures, pamphlets and/or catalogs in an effort to stay abreast of current nursing publication/software. 5. Place orders for current publications/software when deemed appropriate. Decision is based upon subject, format and content in relation to expressed or perceived need. 6. Make recommendations to faculty to review and remove antiquated or outdated materials from library circulation biennially. 7. Monitor ongoing encumbrance of annual Library allocation for School of Nursing and related materials. 8. Conduct informal survey of nursing holdings in the library on a regular basis to assure desirable quality and quantity in relation to current volume of need and use. 9. Maintain and update lists of available resources (videos, DVDs, etc.) 10. Facilitate the preview and evaluation of learning materials (including point of care evidenced based online resources). 11. The Chairperson will represent the School of Nursing on the University Scholarly Communication Committee. 12. Facilitate preview and evaluation of simulation technology. 13. Make recommendations regarding faculty and student policy related to access and use of School of Nursing internal cataloged materials. LEARNING RESOURCES COMMITTEE 51

58 Page 2 C. Membership: 1. Criteria a. Five faculty members, representative from all Departments, to be appointed by the Dean; at least one member shall be from faculty having primary teaching responsibility in the MSN program. b. Students: One junior level baccalaureate student One senior level baccalaureate student c. One master's student d. The Coordinator of the Learning Laboratory will serve as ex officio members of the committee. 2. Terms of Office: a. Faculty members are appointed for a two-year term and may be reappointed. Appointments are staggered to provide continuity. b. Students i. Junior level BSN student elect by class in the fall for two academic years ii. Senior level student completes a two-year term or elected by class to fill a vacancy. iii. Master s student selected annually. 3. Subcommittee: a. Simulation Users Group (SUG) meet periodically for simulations needs and progress for School of Nursing. D. Chairperson: 1. Criteria: Appointed by the Dean; preferably, the Chairperson will have served on the committee for at least one year. E. Meetings: F. Minutes: 1. The Learning Resources Committee shall meet once before Fall Break and thereafter at the discretion of the Chairperson. Minutes shall be distributed to members and to the Dean. 7/92, 4/01, 1/08, 9/12, 1/13 52

59 MSN COUNCIL II A. Purpose: To facilitate collaboration of the graduate faculty to promote the development, maintenance, and revision of the Masters Programs. B. Functions: 1. Review proposals for new and revised curricula. 2. Review policies and procedures related to the Masters programs. 3. Act on matters of the Masters programs referred by the administration, graduate faculty, and graduate students. 4. Advise the administration and faculty committees on matters related to Masters education. 5. Co-ordinate Masters student orientation and designated functions in collaboration with the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs. C. Membership: Faculty with Graduate Faculty appointments D. Chairperson: 1. Elected by council members for a two-year term. 2. In the second year of term a chair-elect is elected at the first meeting in the fall semester. The chair elect serves as chair in the following two years. E. Meetings: 1. Meetings shall be held at least once each semester, at the discretion of the chair, or at the written request of two or more members. 2. A quorum shall consist of members present (not to be less than 10 in number). 3. Minutes will be distributed to all members and to the Dean. 03/07, 1/08, 6/10 53

60 II PhD Council A. Purpose: To facilitate collaboration of the graduate faculty to promote the development, maintenance, and revision of the PhD Program. B. Functions: 1. Facilitate discussion of PhD curriculum issues. 2. Submit proposals for curriculum revision to the Curriculum Committee. 3. Recommend policies and procedures related to the PhD Program to the GraduateSchool. 4. Advise School of Nursing Administration and faculty committees on matters related to the PhD Program. C. Membership: Any School of Nursing graduate faculty member with eligibility to serve on dissertation committees. D. Chairperson: 1. Chair will be elected by the membership of the Council for a two-year term. The chairperson must have full graduate faculty status. 2. A chair-elect is elected at the first meeting in the fall semester of the current chair s second year from all full-time council members. The chair-elect begins a two-year term as chair the following year. E. Meetings: 1. Meetings will be held at least once per semester during the academic year at the discretion of the Chair or at the written request of two or more members of the council. 2. A quorum shall consist of 50% of the graduate faculty with full or associate status on the committee. 3. Minutes will be distributed to all members and to the Dean. 03/07; 1/08 54

61 II PROMOTION, TENURE, REAPPOINTMENT AND POST-TENURE REVIEW COMMITTEE A. Purpose: B. Functions: C. Membership: D. Chairperson: To evaluate individual faculty petitions for reappointment, promotion and/or tenure, or post-tenure review as part of the School of Nursing process. 1. To establish and review the criteria against which faculty in the School of Nursing will be evaluated for reappointment, promotion, tenure, and posttenure review decisions. 2. To receive and review the documentation prepared by the individual faculty member in support of his or her reappointment, promotion and/or tenure, or post-tenure review. 3. To submit to the Dean of the School of Nursing a written evaluation of the teaching, service and scholarly activities as delineated in the candidate s document including a written statement of endorsement or nonendorsement for reappointment, promotion and/or tenure with rationale and vote results. 4. To submit to the Dean of the School of Nursing a statement of evaluation for each candidate undergoing post-tenure review. All tenured full time faculty in the School of Nursing. The Dean is not eligible for membership. 1. Elected bi-annually by the committee from among its members to serve a two year term.person selected will not be subject to action by the committee during the year as chairperson. The current Chair will convene the committee in the fall of the second year to elect the Chair for the following year. 2. The Chair will meet annually with the Dean and the Department Chairs after reviews are completed at the School level, to discuss the quality, cogency, and concision of documentation of promotion, tenure, and reappointment cases. 3. The Chair will represent the School of Nursing on the University Promotion and Tenure Guidelines Committee. 55

62 PROMOTION, TENURE, REAPPOINTMENT AND POST-TENURE REVIEW COMMITTEE Page 2 E. Meetings: 1. The first meeting of the year is placed early on the School of Nursing calendar. Subsequent meetings are called at the discretion of the chair. 2. A quorum shall consist of a majority of the members of the committee. 3. Minutes are recorded only on policy and discussion not related to candidate endorsement or non-endorsement.minutes are distributed to the members and to the Dean. 7/92; 3/95; 4/98; 4/99; 4/02; 7/03; 8/04; 1/08; 03/09 56

63 II RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE A. Purpose: To promote and facilitate research and scholarship within the School of Nursing. B. Functions: 1. To disseminate and communicate information regarding research and scholarly activities. 2. To promote networking related to scholarshipwithin the School, University, and profession. 3. To make recommendations to the faculty and administration concerning policies relative to research and scholarship by both students and faculty. 4. To make recommendations for the allocation of School of Nursing resourcesrelated to research and scholarship activities. 5. To collaborate with campus, community and other agencies to facilitate interdisciplinary research activities and the incorporation of international and intercultural experiences and perspectives into research and creative activity. 6. To periodically make recommendations to the School of Nursingrepresentative to the Faculty Senate and School of Nursing, and campus entities concerning research support, workload and allocation priorities. 7. To collaborate with School of Nursing UNCG IRB representative and campus and federal offices in developing, implementing and evaluating the School of Nursing processes for assuring human and animal subjects protections. C. Membership: 1. Faculty membership criteria: a. Three elected faculty (one from each department). b. A minimum ofthree faculty appointed by the Dean. (One member must be Clinical Track faculty). c. Associate Dean for Research, Director of PhD Program, and School of Nursing representative to UNCG IRB. 2. Faculty Terms a. Elected and appointed members shall serve staggered two-year terms b. The Community Practice and Parent-Child Nursing Departments will elect faculty in the odd years and the Adult Health Nursing Department will elect faculty in the even years. 57

64 RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE Page 2 3. Student membership a. A minimum of one undergraduate student selected by their classmates and approved by the Dean. b. A minimum of one graduate student appointed by the Dean. D. Chairperson: 1. Chair is elected by the committee members and serves a two-year term. 2. A chair-elect is elected at the first meeting in the fall semester of the current chair s second year from all full-time faculty committee members who are willing to be appointed to continue. The chair-elect begins a two-year term as Chair the following year. E. Meetings: 1. Meetings will be held at least twice a semester. 2. A quorum shall consist of 40 percent of members present for voting items. 3. Minutes will be distributed to committee members and to the Dean 4/97;4/99;4/02;3/04; 6/05, 1/08; 4/09; 04/11 58

65 II SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE A. Purpose: B. Functions: C. Membership: D. Chair: E. Meetings: 1. To recommend recipients for scholarships to the Dean of the School of Nursing. 2. To coordinate the selection and presentation of awards to degree candidates at Special Exercises. 1. Maintain current descriptions of scholarships, including criteria for each. 2. Review the process for applying for scholarships. 3. Facilitate dissemination of information about scholarships to prospective recipients. 4. Review scholarship applications and make recommendations to the Dean. 5. Coordinate nomination and/or election of the degree candidates who will receive awards at Special Exercises. 1. Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study and two other faculty members, one with primary teaching responsibility at the undergraduate level, and one with primary teaching responsibility at the graduate level. 2. Faculty Terms: a. Two years; may be reappointed b. Staggered appointments Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study 1. As necessary to meet the responsibilities of the committee. 2. Two members constitute a quorum. 3. Minutes shall be distributed to members and the Dean. 7/92;4/6/94;7/96;4/97;4/99;4/02;6/03, 1/08 59

66 STUDENT ADMISSION, PROGRESSION, AND APPEALS COMMITTEE II A. Purpose: B. Functions: To make recommendations to the Dean of the School of Nursing related to admission to the School of Nursing (undergraduate students). To make recommendations to the GraduateSchool related to admission of masters and doctoral students. To make recommendations related to the School of Nursing and to hear student appeals to School of Nursing policies and regulations. 1. To review and recommend criteria for admission to the School of Nursing programs. 2. To recommend candidates for admission to the general BSN program to the Dean of the School of Nursing. 3. To review graduate recommendations for admission submitted by the Director of Graduate Study. 4. To evaluate the policies related to admission, progression, and appeals annually. 5. To hear appeals for exceptions to School of Nursing policies and to make recommendations to the Dean of the School of Nursing and/or the GraduateSchool following appeal hearings. C. Membership: 1. All members (ten faculty) appointed by the Dean in order to achieve programmatic balance: a. 6 faculty with primary teaching responsibilities in the undergraduate program (one from each department), b. 4 faculty with primary teaching responsibilities in the graduate program (one from each concentration Anesthesia, Education, Administration, A/GNP), at least one of whom also represents the doctoral program. 2. Terms a. All members will serve three year terms, which should be staggered to provide for continuity b. Members may be reappointed after a one year hiatus from the committee with the exception of the chair who could be reappointed for one year without hiatus. 3. Ex Officio: Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study and Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study. 60

67 Student Admission, Progression, and Appeals Page 2 D. Chairperson: 1. Appointed by the Dean from the membership. 2. Will have served on the committee during the previous term. E. Meetings: 1. At least once a semester or as called by the chair. 2. A quorum will consist of 7 members. 3. Minutes are recorded only on policy and discussions not related to candidates or appeals. No identifying information will be included. Minutes are distributed to members and to the Dean. Rev. 4-91,8/91,7/92,4/97,4/99,4/02,6/03,4/05;11/06,1/08 61

68 II STUDENT RECRUITMENT AND ORIENTATION COMMITTEE A. Purpose: To plan and coordinate School of Nursing undergraduate student recruitment and orientation activities. B. Functions: 1. Collaborate and coordinate with any university undergraduate recruitment activities. 2. Conduct orientation of incoming juniors. 3. Other activities related to purpose. C. Membership: 1. Eight faculty members appointed by the Dean, with at leasttwofrom each Department. 2. The Director of Undergraduate Advising. 3. No less than six undergraduate students. (At least three juniors would be elected each year and continue to serve in their senior year.) 4. Ex Officio: Dean. D. Chairperson: 1. To be appointed by the Dean for a two-year term. 2. Must have served at least one year on the committee. E. Meetings: 1. Meetings will be held as needed to complete the assigned tasks. 2. Minutes will be distributed to the members and to the Dean. 7/92;8/94;4/01; 4/05; 11/06, 1/08 62

69 II TEACHING EXCELLENCE AWARD COMMITTEE A. Purpose: To coordinate and facilitate selection of the recipient of the annual School of Nursing Teaching Excellence Award. B. Functions: 1. To set specific dates for the Award selection process and send out call for nominees. The call for nominations should be sent out in the fall (e.g., November), letters of nomination received early in the spring semester (e.g., first week of January), and final materials received by early March. 2. To receive and review documentation presented by and for nominees for the Award. 3. To recommend a final candidate for the Award and forward name to the Dean. C. Membership: D. Chair: Three members elected by their respective departments and the Chair and the chair-elect. Elected members shall serve staggered two-year terms. The Parent-Child and Community Practice departments shall elect members in odd years, and the Adult Health Department shall elect members in even year. Each Teaching Excellence Award recipient shall serve as Chair-elect of the Committee for a one-year term in the year following receipt of the Award and then Chair the committee the following year. 4/97;4/15/00;7/03; 4/05; 11/06 63

70 PART III POLICIES 64

71 III ACADEMIC PROGRAM POLICIES Academic IntegrityPolicy The School of Nursing adheres to the Academic Integrity Policy. The academic integrity policy is described in detail on the web at: Course Attendance Classroom and practicum attendance is expected according to established classroom hours and the practicum contract established with clinical agencies. Unexcused absences are unacceptable. It is the student's responsibility to initiate a request for make-up work missed because of excused absences. Absences (excused or unexcused) may jeopardize the student's ability to pass the course and progress in the major. Notification. The student is expected to notify the instructor when it is apparent that the student must be absent or will be excessively late. It is the Instructor's responsibility to determine exaction of penalties for unsatisfactory class attendances. Possible penalties are lowering the course grade, including a grade of "F", and, in extreme circumstances, dropping the student from the course. Refer to UndergraduateBulletin. The form to submit to withdraw/cancel a student due to class attendance follows in this handbook, or can be found on the web at: (Go to Undergraduate Studies, choose Academics, then Policies, then Class Attendance. You will see a PDF link ofthe Notification of Cancellation/Withdrawal Form.) Permission to Miss Class/Clinical Professional Meetings. Students are encouraged to attend professional meetings or other activities appropriate to course objectives. Prior to missing any class or clinical time for professional activities, students are to obtain the permission of each course leader for courses which will be missed. Other. Permission to miss class or clinical for other reasons (personal reasons) is obtained from the instructor on an individual basis. If possible, missed clinical time will be rescheduled. See class and clinical attendance, above. 65

72 ACADEMIC PROGRAM POLICIES Page 2 Student Records All undergraduate student records are retained in the Office of Undergraduate Advising (School of Nursing). Graduate students records are the responsibility of the Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study. Faculty advisors maintain a separate file on each advisee. Official school records may be reviewed by written request. See Academic Advising under Faculty Responsibilities. AdverseWeather and Campus Closure Both students and faculty are expected to meet the commitments to practicum agencies in the event of bad weather if the agency and the University remain open. All classes meet unless the University is closed. If driving conditions are judged to be exceptionally hazardous by the clinical instructor a decision may be made to postpone or delay the experience. The clinical instructor informs the course leader of the decision. It is the student's responsibility to make a judgment with regard to driving conditions, and if unable to attend clinical, to inform the agency and the instructor of this decision immediately. Clinical experiences that are postponed will be rescheduled as time is available. Ultimately, safe travel is an individual responsibility and decision. Students should be informed at the beginning of each semester of the travel policy and how to reach the individual instructor for information. The University s adverse weather telephone number is or campus police at Employee policies from HRS: Adverse weather statement from the Provost Website: Rev.8/91;7/92;7/03; 7/13 66

73 From undergraduate.uncg.edu/academics/forms/class%20attendance.pdf 67

74 III The University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing Student Dress Code Policy The following is the Student Dress Code Policy for UNCG School of Nursing Students: Uniform Guidelines: A. Two complete standard uniform outfits are recommended. 1. Undergraduate Female Student* Standard white top with UNCG monogram Standard white skirt or pants ¾ or full-length white lab coat with monogram White stockings with skirts; white socks with pants White leather shoes with closed heel and toe Navy blue on white name pin Long-sleeved white turtleneck may be worn under the white top 2. Undergraduate Male Student* Standard tunic with monogram White uniform pants ¾ or full-length white lab coat with monogram White socks and white leather shoes with closed heel and toe Navy blue on white name pin Long-sleeved white turtleneck may be worn under the standard tunic 3. Community Health Uniform for Undergraduate Female and Male Student Navy colored polo/golf-type shirt that says UNCG or UNCG School of Nursing on upper left front (long enough to be tucked in at all times) Khaki slacks (no jeans) Low closed toe and heeled shoes Navy blue on white name pin Long-sleeved white turtleneck may be worn under polo shirt *Uniforms are to be obtained from the approved vendor. Students are expected to buy at least one complete new uniform. 68

75 4. White leather shoes. These may be professional nurse shoes or all white low top leather tennis shoes with closed heel and toe. They should be cleaned or polished as needed. 5. Whenever in clinical experiences that do not require wearing the official UNCG School of Nursing uniform, students are required to wear the following: Navy colored polo/golf-type shirt that says UNCG or UNCG School of Nursing on upper left front. Khaki slacks (no jeans) Low closed toe and heeled shoes The shirts may be purchased from either the UNCG bookstore or Affordable Scrubs. They have both a men s and a women s version of the shirt. Either is acceptable. 6. Name pin format: Sue Jones (RN if licensed) Student UNCG School of Nursing Name pin should be purchased from the designated uniform shop. 7. RNs When functioning in a student capacity, name pins identifying them as UNCG students must be worn. RN and graduate students in clinical settings should wear uniforms or lab coats if appropriate to the agency and the type of clinical experience. B. Hygiene/Grooming/Professional Presentation 1. Cologne/aftershave/perfume: none allowed in the clinical setting. 2. Jewelry: Only the following jewelry is permitted: - One stud-type earring per ear (earring may not extend beyond the ear lobe) - One wedding band - Necklaces that are not visible - One watch with second hand is required - No other visible body jewelry will be allowed - No tattoos should be visible 3. Fingernails: neatly trimmed, i.e., not beyond end of fingertip. Only clear nail polish should be worn. Artificial nails are not permitted. 4. Hair: controlled, off the face, behind the shoulders without large bows or clips. 69

76 C. Agency Requirements In addition to the requirement listed above, students must comply with any dress code policies for nurses set by the clinical agency in which the students are participating in a clinical experience. This includes wearing a photo ID nametag if required. Students who do not comply with the dress code policy will be required to leave the clinical setting 5/92;7/92;4/99;3/14/2000;7/02;7/03;01/06; 4/07; 7/08 70

77 III GRADING Grading System The Baccalaureate Program in Nursing functions in accordance with the grading system of the University as described in the Undergraduate Bulletin. School of Nursing Grading Policy The faculty involved in teaching any given course determines the methods and measures of evaluation in that course. The information on evaluation is included in the course syllabus. Grading Scale The following grading scale has been adopted by the School of Nursing for all undergraduate nursing courses: (We will round off above 0.5 to the next point.) = A = A = A = B = B = B = C = C = C = D = D = D- 64 and below = F 7/92;7/03 71

78 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Nursing XXX Course Syllabus Semester/Year (Guidelines for the format for Course Syllabus) COURSE NUMBER: Should match the number in the Bulletin. SECTION NUMBER: Should match section taught by faculty member in Genie. COURSE TITLE: Should match the title in the Bulletin CREDITS: Should match the credits in the Bulletin PREREQUISTIES/COREQUISITES: Should match the pre/coreqs in Bulletin FOR WHOM PLANNED: List the level and program of study such as Juniors in BSN program and type of course such as required course in the major, elective, core, support, specialty, and etc. FACULTY INFORMATION: List faculty name, room number, phone numbers, address and office hours. BULLETIN DESCRIPTION: Should match current Bulletin description of course. STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: Should be those measurable outcomes/objectives approved by the Curriculum Committee. TEACHING METHODS AND ASSIGNMENTS FOR ACHIEVING LEARNING OUTCOMES: Assignments should explicitly address achievement of learning outcomes. EVALUATION AND GRADING: Explain how assignments will be graded and how these grades will be used to arrive at the final grade for the course. Indicate which course SLO each assignment measures. REQUIRED TEXTS/READINGS/REFERENCES: Use full citations and give rationale for any reference that is older than 5 years. TOPICAL OUTLINE/CALENDAR: Topics should show congruence between objectives and course description. 72

79 COURSE SYLLABUS CONTINUED - Page 2 UNIT LEARNING OUTCOMES: Required by NC Board of Nursing for generic undergraduate courses only. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY POLICY: Each student is required to sign the Academic Integrity Policy on all major work submitted for the course. Refer tohttp://sa.uncg.edu/handbook/academic-integrity-policy/ I HAVE ABIDED BY THE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY POLICY ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. Student Signature ATTENDANCE POLICY: Faculty expectations for course attendance are required to be documented in the syllabus. FINAL EXAMINATION SCHEDULE:Must indicate whether or not the course has a final exam, and must be scheduled in syllabus if required ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AS APPROPRIATE FOR COURSE: DROP POLICY:The School of Nursing adheres to the University Drop Policy with the following exception. In courses taught over a 7 ½ week block, the last day to drop the course without penalty is 4 weeks from the first day of the course (either classroom or clinical day). Include this policy only for 7 ½ week courses. CLINICAL ROTATIONS:These may be appended to your course syllabus and should include agency name, faculty, students, dates for rotation, days, and times. This information also should be forwarded to the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs. CLINICAL EVALUATION GUIDE/MATERIALS: These may be appended to the course syllabus. UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS: Should be included for courses with clinical components. REQUIREMENTS/FEES FOR MOBILITY OR OUTCOME TESTS PREPARATION FOR CLASS ABSENCE POLICY LATE WORK PENALTY Note to faculty: The course syllabus as defined above will be provided for all enrolled students. Additionally, one copy should be filed with the Department Secretary. Additional materials for students may be placed on reserve in the Library and/or one copy made and submitted as a packet to the UNCG Bookstore. The Bookstore obtains permission to reproduce any copyrighted materials and has packets copied for purchase by students. One copy of additional materials, exams, and etc. should be filed with the Department Secretary so that we have a comprehensive set of course materials to provide to our accrediting agencies and for our alumni who may need access to course materials. 8/92; 5/97; 6/00; 7/03; 10/09; 1/13 73

80 From III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING STUDENT APPEAL REQUEST Name: Student ID: Address: address: Telephone Numbers: (H) (Cell) (W) Guidelines for Student Appeals Process 1. This form must be completed by the student who is appealing an admission and/or progression policy in the School of Nursing. The form is not used to appeal a grade. The procedure for appealing a grade is described in the Undergraduate and Graduate Bulletins. 2. The Student Admissions, Progressions and Appeals Committee will hear appeals during regularly scheduled meetings. The student may submit an appeal in writing, or the student may attend the meeting to present the appeal verbally. The committee may ask the student s instructor and/or the course coordinator to make a written or verbal presentation to the committee. Faculty and student presentations will occur concurrently. Please indicate if you will or will not attend the meeting: I plan to attend the meeting. I do not plan to attend. 3. Attach a statement or letter to this form which describes what you are asking of the committee. Include extenuating circumstances that existed in your situation. Generally, students find it helpful to meet with the Chair of the Admissions, Progression, and Appeals Committee prior to the meeting to review the procedure, but this is not required. 4. Once an appeal request is received, the committee chairperson will notify the student verbally and/or in writing of the date the appeal will be heard. Meetings of the committee are closed. Appearances are limited to the student and faculty representatives. One support person of the student s will be allowed to attend the meeting. However, the support person cannot be an attorney and will not be permitted to speak. The student will be notified in writing of the committee s decision within one week of the appeal hearing. 5. Student Appeal Requests are available at Student Appeal Requests should be delivered to the Associate Dean s Office or mailed to: Chair, Student Admission, Progression, and Appeals Committee UNCG School of Nursing Post Office Box Greensboro, NC Student s signature: Date: 74

81 Rev.8-91;7/92;Spring 1999;11/01;3/04;10/04 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING III FORMAL COMPLAINT Formal Complaint: Faculty The School of Nursing faculty defines a faculty formal complaint as one directed to the University Due Process or Grievance Committees. The University policies related to Due Process and Grievances are found on the Provost s website at: If a complaint were to be submitted, evidence of resolution would be filed with the Due Process or GrievanceCommittee Chair and Provost s Office. Formal Complaint: Student A formal student complaint is defined as a written Grade Appeal which is not resolved at the level of the instructor, or an Academic Integrity Board submission verified by filing the academic Integrity Violation Report Form. The Grade Appeal policy is found at (select grading and scroll to grade appeal policy). The Academic Integrity policy is found at Student grade concerns that are resolved by communication with the instructor are not defined as formal complaints, since they typically involve misunderstanding of issues such as the grading scale. Formal complaints include grade appeals that are not resolved at the level of the instructor, and that are presented in writing to the department chair, dean or provost. For grade appeals to the department chair, dean or provost, documentation of resolution is filed in the official student file. A grade change form is completed and sent to the Registrar if a grade change is to be made. Integrity violation report forms are kept confidential and are filed in the Office of the Dean of Students. 4/12; 6/13 75

82 III AGENCY-SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL AGREEMENTS AND LETTERS OF AGREEMENT The School of Nursing operates in close cooperation with the many official and private agencies that provide clinical laboratories for the students. Agency Instructional Agreements All instructional agreements with clinical agencies are handled through the Office of the Dean. A faculty liaison initiates the instructional agreements. Instructional agreements must be completed before students may be placed in an agency. Letters of Agreement (see form next in this Handbook) All letters to agencies, which serve as informal instructional agreements, must have a copy on file in the Dean's office. These letters may only be used while completing a full instructional agreement. All instructional agreements and letters of agreement are handled through the Dean's Office and are on file in the office of the Dean. Criteria for selection of agencies for baccalaureate experiences Experiences provided in any cooperating agency should be 1. appropriate to the individual student's learning needs. 2. relevant to the content of nursing theory courses. 3. opportunities for the student to practice the behaviors set forth in the course objectives. 4. opportunities for the student to develop competencies necessary for the practice of professional nursing. 5. opportunities for the student to participate in problem-solving and decision-making. 6. opportunities for the student to work with others in health-related disciplines. 7. opportunities for collaboration between teacher and learner in identification of learning needs and selection of learning experiences. Criteria for selection of agencies for graduate program clinical experiences 1. The facilities selected shall be approved by the appropriate accrediting or evaluating bodies. 2. The agencies selected shall be of a variety and number that afford opportunities for student practicums in nursing education, administration, clinical practice, and research. 76

83 AGENCY-SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL AGREEMENTS Page 2 3. Learning practicums will provide opportunities for students to a. identify and implement a leadership role within the health care delivery system. b. participate in nursing research as appropriate. c. identify their learning needs and to participate in goal-setting. d. encourage independent study and investigation. 4. Learning opportunities for each practicum will be guided by qualified and experienced faculty members. 5. Conference space will be provided, if possible, for collaboration between faculty and student in identification of learning needs, selection of practicum experiences and discussions as necessary. Faculty Faculty who have students in any agency are responsible for reading the specific agency contract. Rev.8/91;7/92;7/93 77

84 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Letter of Agreement AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO AND (NAME OF AGENCY) The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a working relationship between The University of North Carolina at Greensboro and in providing learning opportunities for. This agreement between The University of North Carolina at Greensboro and will be effective from through. Appropriate Administrative Official Date Director of Nursing Service or Date Agency Preceptor Facilitator/Liaison Date UNCG Faculty Nursing Date Dean, UNCG School of Date Student Attach course materials including guidelines for practicum. This agreement serves as an understanding until a formal instructional agreement can be executed. *reference preceeding pages of Faculty handbook for instructions 7/93; 7/03/; 7/11 III UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO 78

85 SCHOOL OF NURSING GUIDELINES FOR THE FACULTY-AGENCY LIAISON I. PURPOSE OF THE FACULTY-AGENCY LIAISON The Faculty Liaison is responsible for ongoing communication with agencies providing clinical facilities for the nursing education program. The Faculty Liaison will be expected to establish a positive relationship between school and agency, and provide an avenue for orderly two-way exchange of information between school and agency. II. GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE LIAISON ROLE A. Responsibilities of the Faculty Liaison for any agency which participates in the Joint Clinical Committees on Resource Planning: 1. Deliver all Practicum Rotation Forms and course overviews to the agency nursing office by the second week of each clinical rotation. 2. Throughout the academic year, inform faculty and students (each organization) of changes taking place (in the other organization) that relate to clinical experiences. Inform the clinical agency of changes related to clinical experiences that are taking place in the School of Nursing. 3. Inform faculty who have students in the agency of specific changes in agency information affecting all faculty and students, such as parking, orientation, or immunization requirements. 4. Communicate as appropriate with agency leaders for collaboration and communication about clinical learning experiences. B. Responsibilities of faculty liaisons for all other clinical agencies. 1. Notify the contact person identified in the contract of all students who will be in the agency by the end of the second week of the semester. 2. Throughout the academic year inform the clinical agency of any changes in the School of Nursing related to clinical experiences. 3. Inform faculty of specific changes in agency information affecting faculty and students inthe agency, such as, parking, orientation, or immunization requirements. 4. Communicate as appropriate with agency contact person as designated in the contract for collaboration and communication about clinical learning experiences. 5. Liaisons with the Moses Cone Health System Agencies should work with Course Leaders and Department Chairs to follow the Cone System Guidelines for requesting clinical space for students. Cone website: ment/clinical%20placement%20request%20form.doc 79

86 FACULTY-AGENCY LIAISON Page 2 C. Responsibilities of the Course Coordinator: 1. Submit completed Practicum Rotation Forms to the appropriate faculty liaisons by the end of the first full week of each clinical rotation. 2. Submit a copy of the course overview to the faculty liaisons by the end of the first full week of each clinical rotation. D. Responsibilities of the Clinical Faculty: 1. Complete the Practicum Rotation Form and submit to the Course Coordinator before the end of the first week of the clinical rotation. 2. Meet with the appropriate nursing personnel on the assigned unit to discuss objectives and implementation of the clinical experience. 3. Read the agency contract annually before bringing students to the agency. 4. Provide the nursing unit with course materials, and specific written information regarding the clinical rotation. 5. Consult with the faculty liaison regarding your desire to place students at a new clinical agency not scheduled through JCCRP. E. Responsibilities of the representatives to the Joint Committee on Clinical Resource Planning (JCCRP) and the Forsyth County Clinical Coordinating Committee (FCCCC): 1. Make the JCCRP and FCCCC minutes and schedules available to faculty liaisons and to Course Coordinators as appropriate. 2. The minute and books are maintained in the office of the faculty secretaries. 8/91;6/94;2/96;6/96; 7/05; 05/09 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO III 80

87 Faculty Faculty Liaison Agency Date Unit Day (s) Time SCHOOL OF NURSING PRACTICUM ROTATION Nursing Semester Year Phone Number Student: Additional Information (if applicable): Course Coordinator Student Phone Number School of Nursing Telephone No. Faculty Telephone No. Copy of this form goes to: Course Coordinator, Faculty Liaison for Agency, Assoc. Dean Undergraduate Study July 13, 1994, RA/nc, forms/practicu.rot III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO 81

88 SCHOOL OF NURSING INFORMED CONSENT AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN LABORATORY/CLINICAL COURSES I understand that I may be at risk for exposure to infected blood and body fluids in the laboratory/clinical courses at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro's School of Nursing. As part of my education in the School of Nursing I have been taught Universal Precautions regarding exposure to blood, body fluids, and other potentially infectious materials which may carry blood borne pathogens as published by the Centers for Disease Control. I agree to assume the risks of injury associated with the activities described above, including, but not limited to, the contracting of any communicable disease such as Hepatitis A or B or AIDS, and to release and hold harmless The University of North Carolina at Greensboro and its faculty, administrators, and trustees from any and all claims involving personal injury and property damage alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the University, its faculty, administrators or trustees, or any other person. I affirm that I am at least eighteen (18) years of age. I have read and understand the terms of this agreement. My signature below signifies my voluntary acceptance of these terms. Print: Student Legal Name ID# Semester/Year Student Signature Date Faculty Signature Date Approved by Faculty 4/8/92; revised 8/25/98; reviewed 7/05; reviewed by S. Capone, UNCG legal counsel, again, fall 2006 RAbr/manual.fac/partlab.ag/3 [forms/partlab.agr] 82

89 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATION OF STUDENTS IN COURSES WITH A CLINICAL COMPONENT For courses with a clinical component, a written Clinical Evaluation should be completed for each student. The Clinical Evaluation should document whether the student has satisfactorily achieved each objective for the clinical experience. The Clinical Evaluation should be signed by both the clinical instructor and the student. (Note: the student s signature documents that the student has seen the evaluation, not that s/he concurs with it.) The Clinical Evaluation should include narrative comments by faculty, and have a place for comments by students who wish to make them. Course chairs are responsible for developing clinical evaluation forms for individual courses, using the Clinical Evaluation Guide, which follows, as a template. Clinical evaluation forms will be reviewed by the curriculum committee as part of regular course review. A copy of the evaluation form used in a course should be filed with the syllabus in the historical course files. Clinical faculty are responsible for completing an evaluation for each student with descriptive examples of student performance, communicating evaluation results to students, and obtaining students signatures. Clinical faculty should give completed Clinical Evaluations, in alphabetical order based on students last names, to the course chair. Course chairs should give all completed Clinical Evaluations for the course, alphabetized, to the Director of Undergraduate Advising. Evaluations forms should be forwarded to the Administrative Assistant for Graduate Programs for graduate concentrations in Nursing Education, Nursing Administration, and MSN/MBA. Evaluations should be forwarded to the secretaries for the Nurse Anesthesia and A/GNP concentrations. III 4/03 83

90 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING CLINICAL EVALUATION GUIDE StudentClinical Area Clinical DatesInstructor Dates AbsentExcusedUnexcused The following criteria are used in defining the student's level of achievement of objectives and behaviors: Satisfactory (S) Able to make clinical judgment and carry out related nursing interventions with limited supervision. Unsatisfactory (U) Unable to make clinical judgment and carry out related nursing interventions with limited supervision. ANY STUDENT DETERMINED TO BE UNSAFE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE WILL NOT RECEIVE A SATISFACTORY GRADE FOR THE COURSE. SEE UNSAFE PRACTICE POLICY STATEMENT. All of the attached clinical objectives must be completed satisfactorily to receive a satisfactory grade for the clinical component of the course. A satisfactory clinical grade must be earned to pass the course. 84

91 CLINICAL EVALUATION GUIDE Page 2 Instructor Comments: Student Strengths: Areas for Improvement: Student Comments: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Objective 1 Objective 2 Objective 3 Objective 4 Objective 5 Objective 6 Objective 7 Clinical Grade:Date: Instructor's Signature: Student's Signature*: *Student signature indicates that the student has read the evaluation, not that s/he concurs with it. Students who disagree with an evaluation should describe their area of disagreement in the comment section above. 7/16/93; 4/23/03 85

92 NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF NURSING CRITERIA FOR UTILIZATION OF PRECEPTORS IN APPROVED NURSING EDUCATION PROGRAMS (from the NC Board of Nursing, The Suggestions for the Utilization of Preceptors are not mandated by law and have been developed consultatively to assist faculty who utilize this type of teaching strategy to provide quality learning experiences. The Board of Nursing, recognizing the benefits to nursing education programs and clinical agencies gained by utilizing agency employees as preceptors, has developed the following criteria for preceptorships. This teaching methodology is not considered appropriate for teaching beginning nursing knowledge, skills, and abilities; but rather to provide more advanced students the opportunity to apply and synthesize knowledge. The Board of Nursing envisions the preceptor as a Registered Nurse with a minimum of a bachelor s degree, who functions in a role which enhances nursing students learning experiences; and is not a substitute or replacement for nurse faculty. Preceptor experiences are planned experiences for a specific nursing course, are incorporated into the clinical experiences for a student in a particular course and occur in a clinical agency for nursing student experiences. Preceptorships require clearly defined objectives which match the student s needs with an identified professional to facilitate meeting the defined objectives. The role of the faculty member shifts to one of facilitator of the total preceptor experience by planning, counseling, and evaluating the preceptorship through its entirety. The nurse faculty maintains the ultimate responsibility and accountability for the student s achievement of the course goals and evaluation of the student. The following definitions are consistent with the preceptor experiences envisioned by the Board of Nursing: Nurse Faculty - A Registered Nurse, meeting the criteria as defined in Approval of Nursing Programs: Process and Standardsfor Nursing Programs, who maintains the ultimate responsibility for the student s learning in a specific course in a Board of Nursing approved nursing program. A faculty should not be responsible for more than ten students involved in preceptor relationships at one time. Preceptor - A Registered Nurse, with a minimum of a Bachelor s degree, who is a highly qualified professional with specific clinical expertise and knowledge of the teaching/learning process. The preceptor is not an employee of the nursing program. The preceptor agrees to serve as a role model, resource person, and to provide support for a nursing student while supervising the student s clinical experiences. The preceptor-student relationship ideally is a one to one experience. However, depending on the complexity of needs of the patients, the level of the student in the nursing program, and the identified objectives, the preceptor-student ratio may be 1:2 per working shift per preceptor. The number of preceptor/student arrangements per clinical site is based upon but not limited to size of unit, patient acuity, staffing patterns, and availability of preceptors. Nursing Student - An individual who is enrolled in an approved nursing curriculum. The student, during a portion of a nursing course, may be assigned to a preceptor for the purpose of meeting specific objectives by synthesizing previously obtained knowledge and skills. The student is self-directed, supervised by the preceptor, and responsible to the preceptor and nurse faculty for the achievement of the objectives. updated 6/08; 07/12 III 86

93 UTILIZATION OF PRECEPTORS Page 2 PURPOSE: The Criteria for the Nurse Preceptor Relationship have been developed to assist faculty who utilize this type of teaching strategy to provide quality learning experiences. I. Preceptor selection A. Selected by agency clinical supervisor and nursing program faculty B. Qualifications: 1. Licensed RN with qualifications, BS degree minimum, and experiences commensurate with role functions 2. Demonstrated clinical competence commensurate with objectives 3. Participated in professional learning activities commensurate with clinical expertise 4. Interested in assuming the preceptor role 5. Knowledgeable regarding the teaching-learning process II. Preceptor orientation A. Overview of the preceptor relationship including each role and responsibility of preceptor, faculty, and student(s) B. Specific preceptor responsibilities C. Methods of clinical evaluation of student by preceptor and faculty D. Goals and objectives for the clinical experience III. Implementation of the preceptor relationship A. Assessment of learner(s) needs by faculty, student, and preceptor 87

94 UTILIZATION OF PRECEPTORS Page 3 B. Determination of goals and objectives for learning by faculty, student, and preceptor C. Gradual assumption of activities by student as specified by objectives D. Resolution of any problem by preceptor and student with input from faculty and clinical supervisor when indicated E. Periodic meetings with student preceptor, faculty and clinical supervisor to discuss the student s progress and to plan for future experiences (Student encouraged to verbalize learning needs, strengths, and areas of improvement.) F. Availability of faculty for consultation and/or collaboration as well as the performance of periodic observations to determine progress and effectiveness of the relationship G. Retention by faculty of the ultimate responsibility for evaluating clinical learning experiences IV. Evaluation tools elicit: A. Advantages and disadvantages of the experience B. Impact on student(s) knowledge, skills, and abilities C. Suggestions for future preceptor relationships D. Faculty, student, preceptor, and clinical supervisor input regarding progress toward accomplishment of objectives 88

95 UTILIZATION OF PRECEPTORS Page 4 V. Other A. Nursing Program maintains a vita for each preceptor, using faculty vitae form as attached. See Chart of Approved Responsibilities in Nurse / Preceptor Relationships following Guidelines for Preceptor Vitae. Approved 5/18/90 (Agenda ) 8/91; 10/09 89

96 III Guidelines for Preceptor Vitae School of Nursing The University of North Carolina at Greensboro 1. Vitae for the preceptors must be on file in the School of Nursing. Vitae are considered to be valid for up to 5 years. After 5 years, preceptors are expected to provide updated vitae. 2. Preceptors may use one of the following three formats: the form available in the drawer in room 101; or the format of the NC Board of Nursing*; or a resume, as long as the following information is included: $ Name of preceptor $ RN license number, and nurse practitioner certification, if appropriate $ Educational background (including basic RN preparation and any advanced degrees) $ Employment background as an RN $ Previous teaching experience in a nursing program $ Non-nurses (e.g., physicians) must include educational background, andlicensure/certification information $ The faculty member turning in a preceptor s resume must add the following information to the top of the resume: UNCG faculty contact/course leader, course number and section, and semester/year the resume is submitted for the files. 3. The course faculty member working with preceptor is charged with obtaining the vita. All vitae for preceptors working during a given semester should be on file when that semester starts; however, faculty have one month from the start of the semester to obtain vitae not currently on file. 4. Vitae are kept in the office of the Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study, filed by agency. * To download the form from the Board of Nursing, go to the WEB site: < Choose Education from list at left, then Resources for Program Directors, then "Forms." Clicking on that link will take you to a page on which all the Board of Nursing forms are located. The form needed for a vita is titled Faculty Vitae. This form is designed to be used by faculty in a school of nursing, so a couple of items do not apply to preceptors (e.g., the question about tenure). Preceptors may ignore questions that do not apply, or may mark them N/A. Developed academic year;6/03 90

97 III The University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing Preceptor Vita Form Name of Preceptor North Carolina RN License Number Agency Faculty Contact at UNCG Course Numbers (s) and Sections(s) Semester(s) and Year(s) Please fill out all of the information requested below and on the back of this form. You may instead attach a complete, current vita that includes all of this information. The School of Nursing appreciates the time taken to ensure that our records are up-to-date. Education Institution Degree Date Awarded Clinical Major Area of Study Functional Semester/ Quarter Course Number Current Teaching Responsibility Course Name Content Focus Theory/ Clinical 91

98 III Recent Professional Development (last five years) Name of Activity Type of Program Date(s) Sponsoring Agency Date(s) Title Work Experience as a Registered Nurse Full- or Part- Time Agency Role/ Responsibility Date(s) Previous Teaching Experience in a Nursing Program Title Full- or Part- Time School Role/ Responsibility 92

99 NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF NURSING APPROVED RESPONSIBILITIES IN NURSE / PRECEPTOR RELATIONSHIPS Preceptor Nursing Student Clinical Supervisor Nursing Faculty With nursing program faculty, selects preceptor for nursing With clinical supervisor, selects preceptor for nursing student. student. Approves scheduling of time and assignments to insure that the preceptor is available to the student at all times. Attends preceptor orientation. Conducts the preceptor orientation With faculty, reviews: - Responsibility of faculty member, preceptor and student - Clinical objectives - Student performance expectations - Skills checklist (if applicable) - Clinical evaluation tool With faculty and student assesses learning needs, sets goals and objectives for experience based upon identified learning needs. Familiarizes student with staff, policies and organization of the unit. Plans appropriate learning activities. With faculty and preceptor sets goals consistent with objectives for the clinical experience, based upon identified learning needs. Collaborates with preceptor in planning the student learning activities. Collaborates with preceptor in planning the student learning activities. session. With preceptor, reviews: - Clinical objectives - Student(s) performance expectations - Skills checklist (if applicable) - Clinical evaluation tool Assists student and preceptor in setting goals and objectives based upon identified learning needs. Collaborates with preceptor in planning the student learning activities. 93

100 NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF NURSING APPROVED RESPONSIBILITIES IN NURSE / PRECEPTOR RELATIONSHIPS Page 2 Preceptor Nursing Student Clinical Supervisor Nursing Faculty Assumes responsibility for patient Supports preceptor and student by care, within limitation of assisting them in the identification knowledge and skills, with of problems and the development guidance of the preceptor. of the preceptor. Acts as a role model and clinical resource for student(s). Identifies problems related to the preceptor role and/or student and refers these to the clinical supervisory and faculty Meets periodically with student, faculty, and clinical supervisor to determine student progress. Utilizes resources to increase knowledge, skills, and abilities. Identifies problems related to the preceptor role and/or student and refers these to the clinical supervisor and faculty. Meets periodically with preceptor, faculty and clinical supervisor to determine student progress. Evaluates the learning experiences and the preceptor relationship. Is available for consultation and/or collaboration. Makes periodic observations to determine progress and effectiveness of the relationship. Meets periodically with preceptor, student, and faculty to determine student progress. Evaluates preceptor s performance, the learning experiences, and the preceptor relationship. Assists preceptor and student in identifying problems and provides additional instruction when indicated. Is available for consultation and/or collaboration. Makes periodic observations to determine progress and effectiveness of the relationship. Meets periodically with preceptor, student, and clinical supervisor to determine student progress. Evaluates student performance and makes recommendations regarding student s achievement of goals and objectives. Evaluates student clinical performance and determine if the student is meeting goals and objectives. Evaluates the learning experiences and the preceptor relationship. 94

101 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBOROSCHOOL OF NURSING RESPONSIBILITIES IN RESOURCE PERSON RELATIONSHIP Resource Person Nursing Student Supervisor Nursing Faculty 1.With faculty reviews: (a) Student(s) performance expectations, (b) Practicum objectives, (c) Responsibilities of faculty member, and (d) Responsibilities of resource person. 1. With faculty sets goals consistent with objectives for the experience based upon identified learning needs. 1. When requested, assists in selecting resource person(s) for nursing student(s). 1. With supervisor, where appropriate, selects resource person(s) for student(s). 2. Familiarizes student(s) with staff, policies and organization of the unit. 3. With faculty consultation plans appropriate learning activities. 4. Acts as a role model and resource for student(s). 5. Identifies problems and refers these to the faculty. 2. Assumes responsibility for client care, within limitations of knowledge and skills, with guidance of the resource person. 3. Utilizes resources to increase knowledge base. 4. Evaluates the learning experiences and the resource person relationship. 5. Meets periodically with resource person, faculty, and supervisor to determine student progress. 2. With resource person reviews: (a) Student(s) performance expectations and (b) Practicum objectives 3. Assists student(s) and resource person in setting goals and objectives based upon identified learning needs. 4. Collaborates with resource person in planning student(s) learning activities. 5. Assists resource person and student(s) in identifying problems and provides additional instruction when indicated. 95

102 RESPONSIBILITIES IN RESOURCE PERSON RELATIONSHIP Page 2 Resource Person Nursing Student Supervisor Nursing Faculty 6. Meets periodically with student and faculty to determine student progress. 6. Is available for consultation and/or collaboration. Makes periodic observations to determine progress and effectiveness of the relationship. 7. Makes recommendations to faculty regarding student s achievement of goals of objectives. 8. Evaluates the learning experiences and the resource person relationship. 12/86;8/91 7. Meets periodically with resource person and student to determine student progress. 8. Evaluates resource person s performance, the learning experiences, and the resource person relationship. 9. Evaluates student(s) performance and determines if the student(s) is(are) meeting goals and objectives. 96

103 III DISASTER PLANS University Faculty and students in the School of Nursing will participate as needed in the overall University Disaster Plan. The first responsibility of the faculty is to the students and the University. Faculty and students will participate in an all-out disaster as needed. Clinical Agency If a disaster occurs while faculty and students are in the clinical agency, they will remain on their assigned units and continue working until relieved. Campus Epidemic The University of North Carolina Student Health Service has developed an emergency plan for the management of ill students on this Campus. The Director of the Student Health Service has requested that the faculty and students in the School of Nursing participate in this plan. If flu reaches major proportions on Campus, the Director of Student Health will request that all off-campus learning experiences be canceled to prevent further spread in the community. Classes would meet as scheduled. The Director of Student Health will inform the Dean of the School of Nursing if the emergency plan is to be put into action and the services of the School of Nursing are needed. There will be a called meeting of students and faculty on the first regular school day after the Dean is notified. The purpose of this meeting will be a briefing on the situation and a description of the roles and assignments of students and faculty. 8/91 97

104 III PROCEDURE FOR PEER/ADMINISTRATIVE EVALUATION OF TEACHING The purposes of peer/administrative evaluation of teaching effectiveness are to provide faculty with feedback regarding performance and for annual faculty evaluation. Process Peer Observation. The faculty member annually arranges appropriate date and time for observation of performance by peer. Faculty member will provide the peer evaluator with the Peer/Administrative Evaluation of Teaching (PAET) Form. The evaluator will complete the observation and evaluation form and return the form to the faculty member evaluated. Faculty being evaluated will forward a copy to the Department Chair as a part of the Report Form for University Faculty and EPA Non-Faculty Personnel. Administrative Observation. Either the faculty member or the administrator may request an evaluation of teaching effectiveness. Administrators evaluate each faculty member annually, but not necessarily through direct observation. When direct observation is appropriate, the PAET may be completed. The administrator provides a copy of the evaluation to the faculty member and retains a copy for use in annual evaluation. Administrative evaluations are to be completed no later than the end of Spring semester each year. Faculty may wish to retain copies for promotion and tenure documentation. Copies of evaluations will be on file in administrative office. Forms: Form: Peer/Administrative Evaluation of Teaching (next in Handbook) March, 1994 PW/nc peeradm.evl 98

105 III UNCG School of Nursing Peer or Administrative Evaluation of Teaching Faculty Date Evaluator Course Number of Students Topic(s) Frequency of Observations DIRECTIONS: Using the scale below, indicate the number that best describes your evaluation of the faculty member on the following items. You may share your evaluation with the individual faculty member as you deem appropriate. Rating Scale: Excellent = 5 Very Good = 4 Good = 3 Fair = 2 Poor = 1 Non Applicable/Not Observed = NA/NO The faculty member: 1. Displayed comprehensive knowledge of course content. 2. Presented content in clear, organized, and understandable style. 3. Encourages student-faculty interaction. 4. Encourages cooperation/collaboration among students. 5. Encourages active learning. 6. Gives appropriate feedback on performance. 7. Allocates realistic amounts of time to promote effective learning for students. 8. Communicates high expectations. 9. Respects diverse talents and ways of learning. Please answer the following questions on the back of this sheet: 1. What qualities and strategies identify this faculty member as effective? 2. What suggestions do you have to improve effectiveness of this faculty member? Based on Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education by Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda F. Gamson. Peer and administrative evaluators are encouraged to meet with faculty prior to observation of teaching to discuss strategies used to attain the above criteria. 1/93; 4/23/03 99

106 SEVEN PRINCIPLES FOR GOOD PRACTICE IN UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION by Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda F. Gamson From the Wingspread Journal-- special edition SUMMARY Following is a brief summary of the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education as compiled in a study supported by the American Association of Higher education, the Education Commission of States, and The Johnson Foundation. 1. GOOD PRACTICE ENCOURAGES STUDENT FACULTY CONTACT Frequent student-faculty contact in and out of classes is the most important factor in student motivation and involvement. Faculty concern helps students get through rough times and keep on working. Knowing a few faculty members well enhances students' intellectual commitment and encourages them to think about their own values and future plans. 2. GOOD PRACTICE ENCOURAGES COOPERATION AMONG STUDENTS Learning is enhanced when it is more like a team effort than a solo race. Good learning, like good work, is collaborative and social, not competitive and isolated. Working with others often increases involvement in learning. Sharing one's own ideas and responding to other's reactions improves thinking and deepens understanding. 3. GOOD PRACTICE ENCOURAGES ACTIVE LEARNING Learning is not a spectator sport. Students do not learn much just sitting in classes listening to teachers, memorizing pre-packaged assignments and spitting out answers. They must talk about what they are learning, write about it, relate it to past experiences, and apply it to their daily lives. They must make what they learn part of themselves. 4. GOOD PRACTICE GIVES PROMPT FEEDBACK Knowing what you know and don't know focuses learning. Students need appropriate feedback on performance to benefit from courses. In getting started, students need help in assessing existing knowledge and competence. In classes, students need frequent opportunities to perform and receive suggestions for improvement. At various points during college, and at the end, students need chances to reflect on what they have learned, what they still need to know, and how to assess themselves. 5. GOOD PRACTICE EMPHASIZES TIME ON TASK Time plus energy equals learning. There is no substitute for time on task. Learning to use one's time well is critical for student and professional alike. Students need help in learning effective time management. Allocating realistic amounts of time means effective learning for students and effective teaching for faculty. How an institution defines time expectations for students, faculty and administrators, and other professional staff can establish the basis for high performance for all. 6. GOOD PRACTICE COMMUNICATES HIGH EXPECTATIONS Expect more and you will get it. High expectations are important for everyone -- for the poorly prepared, for those unwilling to exert themselves, and for the bright and well motivated. Expecting students to perform well becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy when teachers and institutions hold high expectations of themselves and make extra efforts. 100

107 SEVEN PRINCIPLES FOR GOOD PRACTICE IN UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION Page 2 7. GOOD PRACTICE RESPECTS DIVERSE TALENTS AND WAYS OF LEARNING There are many roads to learning. People bring different talents and styles of learning to college. Brilliant students in the seminar room may be all thumbs in the lab or art studio. Students rich in hands-on experience may not do so well in theory. Students need to opportunity to show their talents and learn in ways that work for them. Then they can be pushed to learning in new ways that do not come so easily. 101

108 PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE EVALUATION OF FACULTY III PURPOSE: The purpose of administrative (usually Department Chair) evaluation of faculty is to summarize each faculty member's performance in teaching, service, and research/scholarship to allocate merit raises, facilitate improvement when necessary, and document counseling relative to criteria in each area that would be significant in the retention, promotion and/or tenure evaluation. *Areas of evaluation: Teaching Service to the University and Community Research/Scholarship PROCESS: Each faculty member develops goals annually from which the evaluation process will begin. Goals should be consistent with the mission of the University and School of Nursing, should focus on areas important to retention, promotion and/or tenure and/or be consistent with an individual's teaching contract and the needs of the School of Nursing. If goals are inappropriate or unacceptable, the appropriate Department Chair should counsel the individual and recommend changes early in each academic year. Evaluation will be accomplished based on observations, summaries of students' evaluations, self evaluation and completion of the on-line Sedona Faculty Report Form or Annual Personnel Report for faculty. The UNCG Report Form will be completed for all faculty who are evaluated according to Exemplary, Satisfactory (very good, good, fair) and Unsatisfactory by the Department Chair. A copy of the completed evaluation will be provided for the faculty member either by mail or at the time of evaluation conference. One signed copy (faculty member and Department Chair) will be forwarded to the Dean's office for the faculty personnel records. A post-tenure review will be completed every five years for tenured non-administrative faculty. PROCESS FOR EVALUATION OF THE DEAN: The Provost completes evaluations on deans every year. A survey of SoN faculty relating to performance of our Dean is done by the Provost s Office every other year. In alternate years, our Dean seeks evaluation directly from the SoN faculty. *Forms: Form: UNCG Report Form July 11, 1994 PW/nc; May 96admevl.fac; Nov.; 07/05; 06/09 102

109 103 III

110 104

111 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Annual Faculty Evaluation by Department Chair III Faculty Rank Tenured Y N Department Based on observations and the data compiled in the UNCG Report Form for University faculty, the following comments are made: 1) Teaching 2) Service 3) Research/Scholarship 4) Overall Evaluation Faculty Comments Faculty Date Department Chair Date July 11, 1994; 5/96 Rabr/Evaltion.DC/3; Nov

112 SCHOOL OF NURSING DEAN EVALUATION Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 1 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the DEAN. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: BASED UPON MY EXPECTATIONS OF A DEAN, I BELIEVE THE DEAN S PERFORMANCE IS: A. Poor. B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. LEADERSHIP 1. The Dean provides effective leadership in establishing School goals and developing plans to accomplish them. 2. In terms of being consistent with School goals, the Dean, with appropriate consultation, has the fortitude to make difficult or unpopular decisions. 3. In terms of being consistent with School goals, the Dean deals fairly in budgetary matters. 4. The Dean recognizes exemplary performance in teaching. 5. The Dean recognizes exemplary performance in research and creative activities. COMUNICATION 6. The Dean effectively communicates the School s needs, values, and points of view to the University. 7. The Dean is accessible to Department Chairs/faculty. An appropriate form of communication with the Dean can be arranged in a reasonable amount of time. 8. The Dean regards the department s problems as her problems, and works with the Department Chairs to resolve them. 9. The Dean effectively communicates with Department Chairs/faculty for administrative improvement. 10. The Dean is open to, and seeks suggestions of Department Chairs/faculty for administrative support. 11. The Dean promotes a collegial atmosphere in the School. 106

113 Dean Evaluation Page The Dean is open and honest in dealing with Department Chairs/faculty. ADMINISTRATION 13. Meetings with Department Chairs/faculty are adequate in number and generally productive. 14. Decision-making procedures are clearly known, consistently practiced, and involve appropriate consultation. 15. The Dean conducts evaluation and review of Department Chairs effectively and fairly, and communicates her evaluations to the Department Chairs. EXTERNAL RELATIONSHIPS 16. The Dean establishes and maintains contractual agreements with health care agencies where clinical experiences are provided for students. 17. The Dean is accountable for program accreditation by appropriate nursing organizations, and for program approval by the NC Board of Nursing. 18. The Dean represents the School of Nursing in nursing organizations at the local, regional, and national levels. 19. The Dean engages appropriate consultants for teaching and research development of faculty. OVERALL EVALUATION OF THE DEAN 20. Overall, I believe the Dean as an effective academic leader is 21. Overall, I believe the Dean as an effective communicator is 22. Overall, I believe the Dean as an effective administrator is OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS The Dean would appreciate comments related to the above categories that you feel will enhance the Dean s performance. You may write comments below and/or attach a separate sheet for comments. 05/09 107

114 SCHOOL OF NURSING ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF GRADUATE STUDY EVALUATION Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 2 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF GRADUATE STUDY. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: BASED UPON MY EXPECTATIONS OF AN ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF GRADUATE STUDY, I BELIEVE THE ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF GRADUATE STUDY S PERFORMANCE IS: A. Poor. B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Serving as the Director of Graduate Study for the master s program. 2. Recruiting students for the graduate programs. 3. Overseeing campus and off-campus graduate programs. 4. Recommending master s students for admission to the Graduate School. 5. Advising and tracking master s students. 6. Coordinating culminating experiences for master s students related to comprehensive examinations, advanced nursing projects, and theses; and approving faculty for projects and theses committees. 7. Recommending students for graduate assistantships and scholarships. 8. Overseeing graduate curricula and programs. 9. Assisting the Dean with administrative and faculty recruitment. 10. Conducting the end of program surveys. 11. Provides administrative oversight for the implementation of the School s Evaluation Plan. 12. Generating data for program approval, evaluation, and accreditation. 13. Assisting the Dean with accreditation and other reports. Evaluation Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study 108

115 Page Overseeing the responsibilities of the program assistant, ITC, and hardware technician. 15. Coordinates information technology activities for the School of Nursing. 16. Oversees website development for the School of Nursing. 17. Fulfills other administrative responsibilities as requested by the Dean. OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS The Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study would appreciate comments related to the above categories that you feel will enhance the Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study s performance. You may write comments below and/or attach a separate sheet for comments. 109

116 SCHOOL OF NURSING ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDY EVALUATION Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 3 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDY. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: BASED UPON MY EXPECTATIONS OF AN ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDY, I BELIEVE THE ASSOCIATE DEAN AND DIRECTOR OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDY S PERFORMANCE IS: A. Poor. B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Coordinating the recruitment of students for the BSN and RN-BSN programs. 2. Overseeing undergraduate campus and off-campus programs. 3. Advising and counseling prospective students for the BSN program and RN to BSN program. 4. Overseeing undergraduate curricula and programs. 5. Coordinating the awarding of School of Nursing scholarships. 6. Assisting the Dean with fund raising for the School of Nursing. 7. Coordinating School of Nursing Special Exercises. 8. Conducting alumni surveys. 9. Managing the schedule of classes in Banner. 10. Generating data for program approval, evaluation, and accreditation. 11. Assisting the Dean with accreditation and other reports. 12. Overseeing the responsibilities for the Director of Undergraduate Advising and faculty advisors. 13. Assisting the Dean with administrative and faculty recruitment. 14. Managing the budget with the Dean. 15. Representing the School of Nursing at designated University and community functions. 16. Fulfilling other administrative responsibilities as requested by the Dean. OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS The Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study would appreciate comments related to the above categories that you feel will enhance the Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study s performance. You may write comments below and/or attach a separate sheet for comments. 110

117 SCHOOL OF NURSING EVALUATION OF ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR RESEARCH Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 4 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR RESEARCH. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: BASED UPON MY EXPECTATIONS OF AN ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR RESEARCH, I BELIEVE THE ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR RESEARCH S PERFORMANCE IS: A. Poor. B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Provides leadership for research/scholarly activities within the School. 2. Coordinates and assists with development of research/scholarly activity resources within the School. 3. Collaborates with faculty to develop/implement research programs. 4. Mentors junior faculty in nurse scientist role. 5. Assists faculty and staff with contract/grant applications pre-award. 6. Assists faculty and staff with contracts/grants management post-award. 7. Assists faculty, students and staff with planning and conducting research/scholarly activities. 8. Assists faculty, students, and staff with dissemination efforts. 9. Collaborates with the IRB representative and Research and Scholarship Committee to enhance guidelines, policies, and procedures for research/scholarly activities within the School. 10. Provides collaborative/consultative assistance and communication with Campus Office of Research Services, Contracts and Grants office, institutes/centers/departments, and Associate Provost for Research, as well as funding agencies/foundations. 11. Collaborates with and supervises the administrative assistant in the School of Nursing s Research Office. OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS The Associate Dean for Research would appreciate comments related to the above categories that you feel will enhance the Associate Dean for Research s performance. You may write comments below and/or attach a separate sheet for comments. 05/09 111

118 SCHOOL OF NURSING DIRECTOR DOCTORAL PROGRAM EVALUATION Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 5 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the DIRECTOR OF DOCTORAL PROGRAM. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: BASED UPON MY EXPECTATIONS OF A DIRECTOR OF DOCTORAL PROGRAM, I BELIEVE THE DIRECTOR OF THE DOCTORAL PROGRAM S PERFORMANCE IS: A. Poor. B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Serving as the Director of Graduate Study for the PhD Program. 2. Managing research assistantship selection and appointment process and other forms of funding awards for PhD students. 3. Advising prospective and enrolled PhD in nursing students. 4. Evaluating the PhD in nursing curriculum in consultation with faculty, the PhD Council, and the Curriculum committee. 5. Monitoring course evaluations and managing data collection to support evaluation of the PhD program. 6. Projecting course enrollments and student progression for school. 7. Establishing the agenda for the PhD Council during the academic year. 8. Designing and implementing periodic seminars for PhD faculty and students. 9. Recommending faculty teaching assignments for PhD courses to department chairs. 10. Assisting faculty with the placement of PhD students for independent research and role experiences. 11. Mentoring PhD students and faculty in scholarly role development. 12. Assisting and supporting faculty in teaching of PhD courses, supervising research, and managing student issues and concerns. 112

119 Evaluation Director of Doctoral Program Page Overseeing the PhD student progression activities including appointment of advisory/dissertation committees, plans of study, preliminary examinations, proposal defenses, and dissertation defenses. 14. Coordinating the visit of consultants for the PhD program. 15. Participating in grant funded initiatives for the PhD program. 16. Providing systematic communication with Dean of Graduate School and the Dean of the School of Nursing on program related issues. 17. Maintaining a record of research and scholarly activities. OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS The Director of the Doctoral Program would appreciate comments related to the above categories that you feel will enhance the Director of the Doctoral Program s performance. You may write comments below and/or attach a separate sheet for comments. 113

120 SCHOOL OF NURSING EVALUATION OF STATISTICIAN/BIOSTATISTICIAN Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 6 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the STATISTICIAN/BIOSTATISTICIAN. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: BASED UPON MY EXPECTATIONS OF A STATISTICIAN/BIOSTATISTICIAN, I BELIEVE THE STATISTICIAN/BIOSTATISTICIAN S PERFORMANCE IS: A. Poor. B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Teaches graduate statistician courses within the School 2. Provides statistical consultation in research design, analysis, and grant writing for School faculty research projects. 3. Serves as a statistical resource for graduate nursing student theses and dissertations. 4. Participates in evaluation of instruction in statistical analysis software for School and University. OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS The Statistician/Biostatistician would appreciate comments related to the above categories that you feel will enhance the Statistician/Biostatistician s performance. You may write comments below and/or attach a separate sheet for comments. 114

121 SCHOOL OF NURSING DEPARTMENT CHAIR EVALUATION- ADULT HEALTH, COMMUNITY PRACTICE, PARENT-CHILD Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. Each faculty member completes an evaluation for the chair of his/her department only. On the Computer Answer Sheet in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column, bubble in: 7 to indicate that this is an evaluation of the CHAIR OF ADULT HEALTH. 8 to indicate that this is an evaluation of the CHAIR OF COMMUNITY PRACTICE. 9 to indicate that this is an evaluation of the CHAIR OF PARENT-CHILD. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: BASED UPON MY EXPECTATIONS OF A DEPARTMENT CHAIR, I BELIEVE THE DEPARTMENT CHAIR S PERFORMANCE IS: A. Poor. B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Communicates with the Dean regarding the needs of the Department and the School of Nursing. 2. Keeps department members informed about relevant issues and administrative decisions concerning areas of responsibility. 3. Represents departmental faculty on the Administrative Advisory Council. 4. Coordinates the fall and spring class schedules and involves faculty, as appropriate, in decisions regarding teaching and committee assignments and other areas of responsibility. 5. Conducts classroom and/or clinical teaching evaluations, conducts annual evaluations, and recommends merit increases to Dean. 6. Is available and willing to listen to ideas, problems, and concerns. 7. Stimulates and encourages professional growth of department members. 8. Recognizes and is willing to take action on problems in the area of personnel performance. 9. Makes recommendations to the Dean in a fair and equitable manner for faculty travel money. 10. Overall, is effective in performing as department chair. OPEN-ENDED COMMENTS The Department Chair would appreciate comments related to the above categories that you feel will enhance the Department Chair s performance. You may write comments below and/or attach a separate sheet for comments. Comments are for which chair? Adult Health Community Practice Parent-Child 115

122 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATION OF CLINICAL SITES USED FOR STUDENT LEARNING At the end of each semester (or academic year, if a faculty member is having students in the same units of a facility both fall and spring semesters of the academic year), faculty members teaching students in clinical courses will complete the Faculty Feedback on Clinical Site (FFCS) for the clinical site. The faculty member may also elect to share the FFCS with the clinical agency. The clinical faculty member will give completed FFCSs to the course chair immediately after the forms are completed. The course chair will forward the completed FFCSs to the Department Chair. Completed FFCSs will be filed in the Dean's office, and will be available for faculty to review. Completed FFCSs should be reviewed by faculty participating in clinical coordinating committee prior to the scheduling meeting. Departments should review all NO comments. 4/03 116

123 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Faculty Feedback on Clinical Site (FFCS) (For Student Learning) III Clinical Agency Unit in Agency Faculty Member Course Date Number of Students CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: FALL SPRING OBSERVATION ONLY YES NO 1. Met contractual obligations. If no, you must explain. YES NO 2. Provided sufficient diversity and numbers to meet course learning objectives. If no, you must explain. YES NO 3. Recommended for future use. If no, you must explain. Strengths of this site for this clinical experience: Suggestions for change for this clinical experience: 11/95 feca/dd; 4/03 117

124 III PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL COURSES USING PRECEPTORS In courses using preceptors for more than observational or 1-day experiences, the preceptor MUST be evaluated by the faculty member (Faculty Feedback on Preceptor Effectiveness (FFPE) and the students (on the course evaluation form). Preceptors must provide input for evaluation of students using Preceptor s Feedback on Student Performance (PFSP). Students will evaluate faculty using the Student Evaluation of Faculty In Clinical Course with Preceptor form. At the beginning of each course that uses clinical preceptors for students, the course chair will provide copies of the appropriate forms to the faculty member(s). The FFPE and PFSP may be expanded to meet the needs of an individual course. However, modified forms must include the four questions of the FFPE and six questions of the PRSP. Following completion of preceptor evaluation, the FFPE will be forwarded to the course chair, Department Chair and Dean, in turn. Clinical faculty may also share the FFPE with the preceptor. Course chairs and Departments should review the use of preceptors with documented lack of effectiveness. All copies will be finally retained in the Dean's office. The completed Preceptor's Feedback on Student Performance form will be used by the faculty member for evaluation of student, and will remain the property of individual faculty member. *Forms: Faculty Feedback on Preceptor Effectiveness Preceptor Feedback on Student Performance Student Evaluation of Faculty and Courses 11/95;4/03 118

125 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Faculty Feedback on Preceptor Effectiveness (FFPE) Course Preceptor Agency Student Faculty Date YES NO 1. Provided student with experiences necessary to meet the clinical learning objectives. If no, you must explain. YES NO 2. Provided feedback on student's progress toward meeting learning objectives. If no, you must explain. YES NO 3. Appropriately requested faculty involvement in resolving issues and N/A problems. If no, you must explain. YES NO 4. Recommended for future use. If no, you must explain. 11/95 FEPE/dd;4/03 119

126 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Preceptor's Feedback on Student Performance (PFSP) Course Preceptor Agency Faculty # of Clinical hours completed at this site Position Date Student During the course of the clinical experience the student: YES NO 1. Actively participated in the planning of learning experiences. If no, you must explain. YES NO 2. Assumed professional responsibilities, within the limitations of his/her knowledge and skills. If no, you must explain. YES NO 3. Appropriately sought assistance/advice. If no, you must explain. YES NO 4. Appropriately engaged in resolution of issues and problems. N/A If no, you must explain. YES NO 5. Utilized diverse resources to increase knowledge, skills, and abilities. If no, you must explain. YES NO 6. Accomplished the clinical learning objectives. If no, you must explain. 05/98 PFSP/dd;4/03 120

127 III STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY AND COURSES Each time a course is taught, students will be given the opportunity to evaluate the faculty member s teaching and the course. Graduate assistants teaching classroom, laboratory or clinical courses will be evaluated using the forms for evaluation of faculty. Evaluations by students are of value to the faculty. The purpose of the evaluations is to provide faculty with feedback regarding their performance, and also to provide information helpful in curriculum decisions and course revisions. They also provide information for annual faculty evaluation. The evaluation process provides a systematic and uniform method of students evaluation of faculty member s teaching and courses and assures student anonymity. Process: The Secretary to the Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study generates the list of courses and faculty to be evaluated from Blackboard, with input from course chairs regarding clinical faculty to be evaluated. The secretary will either deploy online evaluation surveys using ClassClimate (preferred) or deliver paper forms (if online evaluations are not feasible) in envelopes to the course chair before the end of the semester. If evaluations are deployed through ClassClimate, invitations to complete student evaluations of course and faculty are sent to students by . Students access the instruments by clicking on a link. When student completes an evaluation, ClassClimate dissociates the student s name from the survey responses. Student evaluation results in ClassClimate are available only to the secretary, who serves as the ClassClimate administrator. Once grades have been submitted for a course, the secretary makes reports on aggregate student responses, along with student narrative comments, available to the faculty and his/her department chair. If paper forms are used, the envelope will have instructions. The faculty member will distribute the forms to the class and select a student to assist with the completion of the evaluation process. The faculty member will not be present while students complete the evaluations. The student will make sure forms are completed properly. Once all evaluation forms have been collected, the student will return the envelope to the secretary's office. The secretary will coordinate processing the completed evaluation forms into reports through TLC. Faculty and department chairs should receive copies of the student evaluation reports simultaneously. If grades and clinical evaluations (as appropriate) have been submitted for a particular course, faculty in that course can receive student evaluation reports as soon as these are ready for distribution. Tools: Forms approved by the faculty include: -Student Evaluation of Course -Student Evaluation of Faculty in Classroom -Student Evaluation of Faculty in Clinical -Student Evaluation of Faculty in Clinical Course with Preceptor Dispensation/Storage of Completed Evaluations: Completed faculty evaluations and course evaluations are retained by individual faculty members. Copies of course evaluations are relayed to Office of Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study. 8/91;5/93;8/1/94;4/17/95;11/29/95 revised;7/03; 09/05; 03/08, 8/11, 8/12 121

128 UNCG School of Nursing Student Evaluation of Course* Faculty ID # Course Date These forms, along with a summary of student responses, will be given to the individual faculty member after all course grades have been submitted to the Registrar s Office. Thank you for your cooperation in this process. Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 1 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the COURSE. Bubble in the Instructor ID number in the SPECIAL CODES column. Write the course number in the Last Name column but do not bubble it in. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: A. Poor B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Clarity and appropriateness of course objectives. 2. Consistency of course content with course objectives. 3. Contribution of textbooks and references to attainment of course objectives. 4. Contribution of teaching strategies to attainment of course objectives. 5. Clarity and appropriateness of evaluation procedures for course. 6. Understanding of concepts and principals in the nursing field was facilitated. ANSWER ONLY IF COURSE HAS CLINICAL COMPONENT (otherwise leave blank) 7. Integration of clinical/laboratory experiences with course content. 8. Clinical precepted experience, if used, contributed to attainment of course objectives. (Skip if no precepted experience used) 9. Clinical preceptor, if used, was effective in helping student achieve course objectives. Please provide any specific comments about your preceptor, including the preceptor s name, in the space for comments below. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS- answer directly on this page. Use the back if needed. a. What topics and experiences in the course were most helpful to you? b. In what ways could the course be improved? (If you rated any item as 1 or 2, please comment on your ratings.) *may be administered in on-line format through ClassClimate 4/13 122

129 UNCG School of Nursing Student Evaluation of Faculty in Clinical Course with Preceptor* Faculty ID # Course Date These forms, along with a summary of student responses, will be given to the individual faculty member after all course grades have been submitted to the Registrar s Office. Thank you for your cooperation in this process. Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 4 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the FACULTY IN CLINICAL WITH PRECEPTOR. Bubble in the Instructor ID number in the SPECIAL CODES column. Write the course number in the Last Name column but do not bubble it in. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: A. Poor B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Orientation of students to clinical expectations and evaluation process. 2. Provision of appropriate feedback on learning plan. 3. Assistance to students in integrating knowledge and research from relevant fields into learning activities. 4. Facilitation of student s recognition of own learning needs. 5. Encouraged students in the use of available resources and learning activities. 6. Communicated regularly with student and preceptor regarding objectives, learning experiences and learning needs. 7. Provision of timely/constructive feedback on assignments and performance in the clinical setting. 8. Promotion of professional values and behaviors. 9. Fairness and impartiality in dealing with students. 10. Respect for the confidentiality of interactions concerning students. 11. Assisted in resolution of problems or issues related to the clinical experience. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS- answer directly on this page. Use the back if needed. a. What aspects of the faculty s teaching were most helpful to you? b. In what ways could the faculty s effectiveness be improved? (If you rated any item as 1 or 2, please comment on your ratings.) *may be administered in on-line format through ClassClimate 123

130 UNCG School of Nursing Student Evaluation of Faculty in Clinical* Faculty ID # Course Date These forms, along with a summary of student responses, will be given to the individual faculty member after all course grades have been submitted to the Registrar s Office. Thank you for your cooperation in this process. Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 3 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the FACULTY IN CLINICAL. Bubble in the Instructor ID number in the SPECIAL CODES column. Write the course number in the Last Name column but do not bubble it in. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: A. Poor B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Knowledge appropriate to clinical setting displayed. 2. Orientation of students to clinical expectations, agency(s), and evaluation process. 3. Appropriateness of clinical experiences selected for meeting objectives. 4. Assistance to students in integrating knowledge and research from relevant fields into clinical content. 5. Facilitation of student s recognition of own learning methods. 6. Encouraged student in the use of available resources: self, books, journals, staff members, peers. 7. Encouragement of students to share knowledge and experiences in group conferences. 8. Provision of timely/constructive feedback in the clinical setting and/or on assignments. 9. Promotion of professional values and behaviors. 10. Fairness and impartiality in dealings with students. 11. Respect for the confidentially of interactions concerning students. 12. Effectiveness as a clinical teacher. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS- answer directly on this page. Use the back if needed. a. What aspects of the faculty s teaching were most helpful to you? b. In what ways could the faculty s effectiveness be improved? (If you rated any item as 1 or 2, please comment on your ratings.) *may be administered in on-line format through ClassClimate 124

131 UNCG School of Nursing Student Evaluation of Faculty in Classroom* Faculty ID # Course Date These forms, along with a summary of student responses, will be given to the individual faculty member after all course grades have been submitted to the Registrar s Office. Thank you for your cooperation in this process. Use the accompanying Computer Answer Sheet to respond to the items below. Fill bubbles completely using a #2 pencil. Do NOT put your name or identifying information on the Computer Answer Sheet. On the Computer Answer Sheet, bubble in 2 in the GRADE OR EDUCATION column to indicate that this is an evaluation of the FACULTY IN CLASSROOM. Bubble in the Instructor ID number in the SPECIAL CODES column. Write the course number in the Last Name column but do not bubble it in. Use the following statement to respond to the items listed below: A. Poor. B. Fair C. Good D. Very Good E. Excellent If you cannot evaluate an item, leave it blank. 1. Knowledge of course content displayed. 2. Effectiveness of instructional strategies used. 3. Clarity and organization of content presentation. 4. Appropriateness of evaluation methods for the content and the learners. 5. Provision of constructive feedback in the classroom and/or on assignments. 6. Fairness and impartiality in dealing with students. 7. Effectiveness as a teacher. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS- answer directly on this page. Use the back if needed. a. What aspects of the faculty s teaching were most helpful to you? b. In what ways could the faculty s effectiveness be improved? (If you rated any item as 1 or 2, please comment on your ratings.) *may be administered in on-line format through ClassClimate 125

132 III FACULTY RESPONSIBILITIES Liability Insurance All faculty are covered under the blanket School of Nursing policy for instructional activities. Licensure All School of Nursing faculty members must have current NC Nursing licenses as registered nurses. The Department Chairs are responsible for monitoring that faculty are currently licensed. Academic Advising All students with a major in nursing are advised by nursing faculty. All full time faculty members are assigned advisees, either undergraduate students, graduate students, or both. The Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study is responsible for the academic advising of undergraduate students in the School of Nursing. The Director of Undergraduate Advising maintains undergraduate records. The Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study is responsible for the advising of graduate students. The Program Assistant to the Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study maintains graduate student records. Advisors maintain copies of pertinent portions of the student s file. Once a student graduates, alumni records are housed in room 121. Promotion and Tenure Faculty in the School of Nursing meet the same criteria for promotion and tenure as all faculty at UNCG. Consult the Handbook for Faculty for guidelines and protocol. Consult the School of Nursing Promotions and Tenure Committee--see committee descriptions appended to School of Nursing Bylaws. Room Reservations All requests for classrooms and conference rooms are handled by the Office Assistant in Room 103Aexcept requests for Room 107 and 201 which are handled by the Dean's Secretary in Room 112. Please submit room requests in writing to the appropriate person (Form in Room 101, Box 36), including date(s) room(s) is/are needed; size of room(s) needed (seating capacity); purpose (committee meeting, thesis committee, course seminar, etc.) and any other information which would be helpful in filling request. The requests can be placed in their mail box or hand delivered to them. 126

133 FACULTY RESPONSIBILITIES Page 2 Faculty Schedules Faculty are expected to keep an appropriate number of office hours each week (4-5 hours). Please try to arrange office hours when students you are working with are not in class. These hours should be posted. At the start of each semester, the Lead Secretary will request each faculty member's teaching and clinical schedule for that semester so that students and/or the faculty member could be located in the event of an emergency. Faculty are requested to provide their Department Chair and the Dean s secretary with a cell phone number to facilitate locating a faculty member in the event of an emergency. 8/91;6/94;7/02;7/03; 8/12; 8/13 127

134 FACULTY TRAVEL FORM TRV-1 (Rev. 6/13) Requests for travel funding should be submitted to Department Chairs. Refer to the following website for travel information: FORMS: Forms for all Faculty Travel (Department, Administratively funded Faculty Travel and Clinical Travel and Travel Log) are available in the Mailroom, Room 101, in first 3 file drawers. Faculty traveling on Grant Funds can obtain forms from the grant budget administrators or in the mailroom, Room 101. COST CALCULATIONS: Please use the BACK of the form to calculate costs NOT the AFTER TRAVEL section. Mileage reimbursement rate is available at: Current rates for meal allowances can be found at: Hotel rates should include any sales and occupancy taxes, which may be obtained from the hotel or sponsoring organization if they are not included on the reservation form. These taxes add significantly to the hotel rate and must be accounted for. TRV-1 FORM Prior to Travel Traveler s Name: Name of the person traveling. University Identification number: Not social security number. UNCG Employee: Employed by the university and receive benefits from the state. Contact Telephone Number: Number of individual to contact if we have questions. Address: Address where check should be mailed. Student: Yes or No. Citizenship Status: If Non-resident alien, contact Tax Compliance Officer ext Destination: City/State or Country. Purpose: Reason for travel. Estimated Cost of Trip: The amount anticipated to spend while in travel status. Leave/Return Date and Time: Beginning travel status/ending travel status. Traveler s, Department Chair s, and Dean s Signatures and Dates. Note: Foreign travel requires dean approval. If it is charged to a grant 20XXXX-22XXXX, it should also be approved by the Contracts and Grants specialist. Reimbursement of Traveler for Registration or Air Transportation before trip, DO NOT use BANFIN-32. Complete the top portion of the TRV-1 obtain signatures and approvals. Make copy of TRV-1. Write or type in the air transportation and/or registration amount in the Reimbursement of Expenses Paid by Traveler. Complete the bottom of the form. Attach original receipts paid by traveler to the copy of the TRV-1. Obtain signatures and approvals at the bottom of the TRV-1. Send to Accounts Payable for processing. Retain signed and approved original TRV-1 in department until completion of trip. Reimbursement of Expenses paid by Traveler must be completed by traveler at the completion of trip. Retrieve original TRV-1 with signatures and approvals. You may attach the original TRV-1 to the TRV-1 that is completed online or you can use the original by writing in all the information. III 128

135 FACULTY TRAVEL Page 2 Obtain signatures and approvals at the bottom of the TRV-1 at completion. Send in the original TRV-1 with original receipts for processing. OTHER expenses such as internet services, phone and parking, should be separated from the hotel expenses. Tips and Gratuity must be reasonable. Excessive tips will not be reimbursed. - Airports: Baggage Handling/Skycaps=no more than $2/bag, shuttle drivers=no more than $2/bag. - Parking/Auto Related: Valets=$2 per car when collecting the car, taxi drivers=15% of the fare and $1-$2 a bag. When traveling via personal car, attach a travel log with a MapQuest comparison to verify mileage. When purchasing hotel, car rentals via Expedia, Priceline, Cheaptickets, etc., attach the actual receipt from the business establishment. Foreign travel requires Dean s approval before and after trip. Provost approval is necessary for travel over $2,000 prior to trip. Foreign currency conversion website is OANDA.COM. Foreign travel paid by grant funds 20XXXX-22XXXX should be sent to the Office of Contracts and Grants for approval prior to sending to Accounts Payable. Entertainment may be reimbursed from discretionary funds. Who, What, When, Where and Why should be listed on the receipts or on a separate sheet of paper. ITEMIZED RECEIPTS ARE REQUIRED. SUBMITTING FORMS: Complete the BEFORE TRAVEL section of the form, sign, and submit it to the Department Chair prior to any travel. Please forward only those forms that clearly spell out the purpose of the travel. The following examples are unacceptable to State auditors: (a) acronyms (i.e. to attend ABCDEFG annual meeting ); (b) incomplete purpose (i.e. to present paper or to attend workshop ). You MUST indicate time of departure and time of return. The faculty member will receive the original completed form after it is signed by the Dean. Retain this form for completion upon travel return. Clinical travel will be approved only for faculty travel to clinical agencies outside of Greensboro (11/20/96 AAC). Clinical travel forms and logs are submitted monthly at the end of the months of September (for August and September), October, and December (November and December); and the end of January, February, March, and May (for April and May). ALL TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS FOR FALL SEMESTER MUST BE SUBMITTED BY DECEMBER 15, AND FOR SPRING SEMESTER BY MAY 15. University policies and procedures for travel must be followed for reimbursement of clinical travel. Reimbursement may not be made for commuting between the employee s home and duty station. If the distance is farther than travel from home to UNCG, you may be reimbursed for the difference with prior written approval from the Department Chair. REIMBURSEMENT: Documentation for registration fees must be provided. Meals that are included in the registration will not be reimbursed. All receipts excluding meals (i.e. original hotel bill for each person requesting reimbursement, registration receipts, parking) must be provided when filing for reimbursement. For your own protection, never submit a receipt showing your credit card number without deleting the number. The last page of an airline ticket (receipt) and/or E-Ticket with type of payment identified is required for documentation. When travel has been completed for which reimbursement is due, the form, with all documentation and required signatures, is submitted to the Business Officer for processing. REIMBURSEMENT MUST BE REQUESTED WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF TRAVEL. (effective 8/1/92) If a reimbursement check does not arrive within three weeks, the faculty member should inquire at the Office of Accounting and Budgets (Travel Audit), ext , about the status of the reimbursement. 129

136 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING STUDENT MANAGEMENT OF PARENTERAL/MUCOUS MEMBRANE EXPOSURES When there is a parenteral (i.e., needlestick or cut) or mucous membrane (e.g., splash to the eye or mouth) exposure to blood or other body fluids, the student is to follow this protocol: 1. Wash the skin exposure site well with soap and water. Flush eye with water. Avoid using damaging substances such as bleach. Do not bleed tissue. Rinse well. 2 Inform the Faculty member who will advise you. 3. Inform the Nurse in charge of the unit. 4. Inquire about the need to complete necessary incident or agency reports. Schedule a completion time for these reports with the agency. This may be as soon as possible following the exposure or at a later date, based on exposure risks. 5. Leave the clinical area as soon as possible to obtain medical consultation and evaluation. Contact your own health care provider (personal physician, the emergency room, or the UNCGStudentHealthCenter). 6. Depending on the nature of the parenteral exposure, it may be necessary to begin drug treatment within hours of exposure. For this reason, the School of Nursing recommends that students seek medical advice immediately after informing the faculty member and the Nurse in Charge. 7. Notify the OSHA trainer in the School of Nursing of your exposure. The trainer for the academic year is Ms. Jayne Lutz. Contact her via at: [email protected]. Neither the clinical agency nor the University is responsible for the cost of the care that is involved in the treatment, management or surveillance of exposure to blood or body fluids. For this reason, the School of Nursing strongly recommends that all students have personal health insurance. Reference: CDC. Public health service guidelines for the management of health-care worker exposures to HIV and recommendations for post-exposure prophylaxis, MMWR , p27. Rev. 6/91;7/92;5/18/1994;7/

137 III Form available at 131

138 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING HAZARDOUS WASTES IN THE LEARNING LABORATORIES A. Contaminated needles are placed immediately after use in a puncture resistant container. Contaminated needles are not recapped, bent, or removed before being placed in the puncture resistant container. Latex gloves are worn whenever there is potential contact with blood and/or body fluids. Latex gloves and masks are available in the closet in Moore Rooms428 and 429 and in McIver 251 and 251 closet. B. Sharps containers are locked in the closet in Moore Room 429 and McIver 251 until they are full. The unused sharps containers are stored in Moore 428 and McIver 251 Closet. Full sharps containers are stored in a hazardous waste container in Moore 428 and McIver 251 Closet and are removed by SteriCycle. C. Other hazardous wastes such as cotton balls, alcohol swabs, linens and gloves are placed in a plastic bag in the step-on hazardous waste container in the locked closet in Moore Room 428 and McIver 251. When the container is full, the plastic bag is removed using correct gloving and gowning procedure and is placed in the hazardous waste containers in Moore 428 and McIver 251. This container must be closed with the provided lid and not be in contact with clean items stored in the closet. PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING PARENTERAL/MUCOUS MEMBRANE EXPOSURES IN THE LEARNING LABORATORY If there is a needle stick or splash exposure to blood or other body fluids while in the learning laboratory, the student is to follow this protocol: 1. Wash the skin exposure site well with soap and water. Avoid using damaging substances as bleach and don't bleed tissue. Flush well with water. 2. Inform the faculty member who will advise you. 3. Leave the clinical area immediately to obtain medical care and advice. Contact your own health care provider immediately (personal physician, or the UNCGStudentHealthCenter). The University is not responsible for the cost of the care that is involved in the treatment, management or surveillance of exposure to blood or body fluids. NOTE: Students are expected to use Universal Precautions whenever there is a possibility of contact with blood and/or body fluids. Students receive instructions about Universal Precautions before participating in laboratory activities with potential for contact with blood and/or body fluids. NOTE: Policies for Student Management of Parenteral/Mucous Membrane Exposures are in the School of Nursing Faculty Manual and The School of Nursing Student Handbook. 132

139 133

140 POLICY III Faculty Appointments in the School of Nursing Faculty appointments in the School of Nursing are made in accordance with the appointment policies, procedures and documents published in The University of North Carolina at Greensboro Handbook for Faculty. In addition, the Dean and faculty members in the School of Nursing who teach clinical courses and those who teach in the generic nursing program, must be currently licensed as registered nurses in North Carolina. All faculty members teaching in the generic program shall have had a minimum of two years prior employment in direct patient care as a registered nurse. In addition, course coordinators shall also have had a minimum of one year of full-time teaching experience in a nursing program. Definition Faculty practice extends the mission of the University of North Carolina Greensboro and the School of Nursing through the delivery of advanced health care to individuals, families, communities, and agencies, through the roles of clinician, educator, researcher, consultant, and administrator. Excellence in teaching is achieved through the integration of research, practice, and community engagement with the SON primary focus being vulnerable populations. Faculty practice may include but is not limited to: student practica, internships, preceptorships, research activities, UNCG SON Health Center services, community partnerships, as well as volunteer or reimbursed clinical employment. Policy The faculty practice plan allows for a multitude of opportunities for both tenure/tenure track and clinical faculty to participate based on their expertise, research interests, volunteer or work interests in traditional and non-traditional settings, as well as to fulfill North Carolina Board of Nursing and national certification requirements. Faculty practice may be met through teaching, research, or service assignments as well as consultant fees, clinical reimbursement, or volunteer activities. Faculty practice outside of the teaching, research, or service assignment may be conducted as long as the obligations for full or part-time employment of the UNCG SON have been satisfactorily met. The UNCG SON does not assume liability for faculty practicing outside of their UNCG SON assignment in any capacity, voluntarily or reimbursed, and faculty must be covered by private malpractice insurance. Faculty working outside the university for pay must complete an External Activities for Pay Form annually, plus update and/or submit a new form when circumstances change. The form is to be completed by the employee, signed by the employee, signed by the Department Chair, and then signed by the Dean. The form will then be sent to the Provost Office. Below are the websites for the form and for the UNCG Policy regarding working outside the university for pay. External Activities for pay FORM can be found at: UNCG POLICY can be found at: 7/92 pol.facap rev.96 Approved 10/09 134

141 III University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP ACTIVITIES All research activities conducted by faculty or students in the School of Nursing must comply with University policies on research. The Office of Research Compliance (ORC) coordinates compliance measures on campus and acts as a resource for the university community s concerns regarding compliance requirements. The ORC website, contains links and details about the University s required policies. It is incumbent upon each Principal Investigator and research team member to comply with the most up to date protocols, guidelines and processes. These policies include: 1. The University Policy and Procedure for Ethics in Research 2. The Policy on the Protection of Human Subjects in Research 3. The Policy on the Protection of Animal Subjects in Research 4. The Policy on Data Safety and Compliance Monitoring 5. The Copyright and Use Policy 6. The Patent and Copyright Policies 7. The Guidelines on Use of Indirect Cost Recovered 8. Policy on Data Safety and Compliance Monitoring The School of Nursing also has additional procedures that are specific to faculty, staff, and students. Selected School of Nursing (SON) procedures are provided below. Additional procedures, forms guidelines and assistance may be obtained from SON Research Office. A list of research and scholarship resources is included at the end of this section. Policies are provided to assist faculty, staff and students in the timely, appropriate and successful conduct of research. Research by Students Students proposing research must have a faculty sponsor. The faculty sponsor is responsible for ensuring that the procedures for review and conduct of the study are followed appropriately. Faculty members who assign or supervise research conducted by students are responsible for the scientific integrity of the study, and for safeguarding the rights and welfare of subjects in the research. As of August 2007, faculty sponsors serve as the PI on student protocols. Grant Proposals All proposals for research funding initiated by School of Nursing faculty members, staff and students must be approved by the School of Nursing Associate Dean for Research (ADR) before submission to potential funding agencies. The Associate Dean will assist the Principal Investigator (PI) in coordinating processing and approval of the proposal through the Offices of Sponsored Programs and Contracts and Grants. Research using School of Nursing Faculty, Staff, or Students as Subjects It is preferable that all proposed research involving use of School of Nursing students, staff, or faculty as subjects, whether initiated within the School or external to the School, is reviewed by the School of 135

142 GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP ACTIVITIES Page 2 Nursing Associate Dean for Research, in consultation with the Research and Scholarship Committee and the chairs of any courses involved, to determine whether the proposed activities are consistent with the goals and mission of the School, and whether they place inappropriate burdens on faculty, staff or students. Research Involving Human Participants The UNCG Institutional Review Board (IRB) must review and approve all plans for the use of human participants in research prior to the beginning of the research. The IRB must also review and approve all revisions, modifications, or amendments to research protocols before any changes are implemented. Information, forms, and procedures are on the IRB website ( A. Procedures for obtaining IRB approval for new research are as follows: The Principal Investigator (PI) submits a copy of the UNCG IRB Application for research on human subjects to the School of Nursing Associate Dean for Research. The Associate Dean (or designee) will coordinate review of the application by the Research and Scholarship Committee. Once the Research and Scholarship Committee has reviewed the Application, the Associate Dean (or designee) will notify the PI, who then submits 2 copies of the IRB Application to the School of Nursing Research Office and contact the SON IRB Representative (or alternate) by that the completed application is in the Research Office. The Application should be completed and signed by investigators (including students) with education in human subjects protection attached. REMINDER that the SON review requires an analysis section to be completed on a separate page (or two) for initial internal review. The School of Nursing IRB Representative (or alternate) will submit to and coordinate review by the UNCG IRB. (See for more details on IRB procedures and forms.) REMINDER that applications should be submitted to the UNCG IRB at least 30 days from when data collection initiation is desired. Federal guidelines require some types of studies to be reviewed by the full IRB committee, but allow others to be reviewed by a subcommittee in an expedited process. If the application requires review by the full IRB committee, the PI will be invited to attend. It is highly recommended that the PI attend the review meeting, so s/he can answer any questions the IRB has about the application. When applications by students are reviewed, faculty sponsors should also attend. The decision about level of review is determined by the IRB, not investigators. PIs may also submit an Exemption Review Request Application, but be aware that if not approved, the full IRB Application must be submitted. The UNCG IRB will either approve or disapprove the study. No data collection, recruitment or subjects, or other research activities can be conducted until approval of the IRB is obtained.the IRB will notify faculty PI of the disposition of the application. For research proposed by students, the IRB notifies the faculty sponsor (rather than the student) of the disposition. It is the faculty sponsor s responsibility to notify the student of disposition of the application. The PI provides a copy of the disposition notification to the SON IRB Representative (or alternate). When funding is sought, a copy of the disposition should be provided to the SON Research Office. The PI should retain a copy of the disposition notification for his/her records. 136

143 GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP ACTIVITIES Page 3 IRB approval is valid for no more than a 1 year time period. The IRB Renewal Application must be completed and approved at least one month before the expiration date for research activities to continue. If the research is completed, the PI (or faculty sponsor, for student research) must indicate this on the renewal application and return it to ORC. If a protocol is renewed for four years, the Fifth Year Renewal Procedures must be followed. B. Procedures for obtaining IRB approval for achangeto an already approved study: When a PI wishes to make a change to an already approved study, s/he completes an Application for Modification to an Approved IRB Protocol (available from the IRB web site) and submits it to the School of Nursing IRB Representative (or alternate). (See for more details on these procedures and forms). If the study is funded, a copy should also be provided to the SON Associate Dean for Research. The change cannot be implemented until approved by the IRB. C. Procedures for Conducting a Study Confidentiality forms, research records and signed consent forms from human subjects must be retained in a secure location.storage and security should be per approved IRB protocol. The records, data, and consent forms must be available for review by the IRB and the SON Research and Scholarship Committee for data safety monitoring. The PI should notify the School of Nursing IRB Representative or alternate and Office of Compliance immediately if any injury or harm to subjects occurs during a study, or if any unexpected circumstances arise. In the case of harm resulting from unanticipated risks, the PI must discontinue all data collection until the IRB has reviewed the incident. An Adverse Problem form may be filed. Research Involving Animal Subjects The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) must review all plans for the use of animals in research prior to the beginning of the research. The IACUC must also review all revisions to research protocols before the changes are implemented. Procedures for obtaining IACUC review for research are similar to those for human subjects. The PI completes the Application for Research Animal Use found at ( Follow the procedures as outlined above for human subjects. The IACUC, rather than the IRB, will provide oversight of studies involving animals. The roles of the Associate Dean for Research and the SON Research and Scholarship Committee, SON IRB Representative (or alternate) will be the same as outlined above. Scientific Integrity Ensuring Scientific Integrity is expected by all students, staff and faculty members. This includes not 137

144 GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP ACTIVITIES Page 4 only the appropriate conduct of studies, protection of human subjects, financial disclosure, conflict of interest, and storage and use of data, but authorship and ownership issues. SON Guidelines for Authorship and Ownership and Data Safety Monitoring are utilized and discussed in the following sections. Additional federal and UNCG policies also apply as noted throughout this section and on the UNCG webpage. Data and Safety Monitoring The SON Research and Scholarship Committee will periodically conduct safety and compliance monitoring to ensure adherence to approved study procedures and consent procedures, security of data, protection of subject confidentiality, and provision of appropriate protections to subjects.the UNCG Compliance Officer and IRB may also conduct safety and compliance monitoring. Initiated 5/2002, revised 6/2003; updated 4/2004; 7/2007; updated 10/2007; revised 02/

145 University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing Resources for Research and Scholarship Activities Association of College and Research Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Creative Commons, Fair Use of Copyrighted Materials (US Copyright Office), Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (U.S. Copyright Office Summary) Fine, M.A., & Kurdek, L.A. (1993). Reflections on Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order on faculty student Collaborations. American Psychologist, 48 (11), Graf, C., Wager, E., Bowman, A., Flack, S., Scott-Lichter, D. & Robinson, A. (2007). Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: A Publisher s Perspective. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 61 (Suppl. 152), International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (October 2007). Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. Midwest Research Nursing Society. (2002). Guidelines for Scientific Integrity, 2 nd ed. Wheat Ridge, CO: Author. Sokoloff, G. (2002). Who s on first? Issues of Authorship in GraduateSchool. American Pscyhological Association of Graduate Students, Science Commons, School of Nursing Graduate Group Policy on Fairness of Authorship Credit, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC), University of Pennsylvania, Policy on Fairness of Authorship Credit in Collaborative Faculty Student Publications, UNCG Copyright Ownership and Use Policy (2002), UNCG Copyright Compliance for Users of UNCG Technology Policy, UNC Primer on Copyright Use, 139

146 III University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing RESEARCH CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT I name of person have agreed to assist with type role in project for the research project entitled _type name of project as on IRB approval form. I agree not to discuss or disclose any of the content or personal information contained within the data, tapes, transcriptions or other research records with anyone other than the Principal Investigator, type in name the Co-Investigator, _type in name or in the context of the research team. I agree to maintain confidentiality at all times and to abide by the UNCG Policy and Procedure for Ethics in Research and the UNCG Policy on the Protection of Human Subjects in Research. Date: Signature Investigator Please file a copy with the PI and SON Research Office. Initiated 5/2002, revised 6/

147 III University of North Carolina, Greensboro School of Nursing PROTOCOL REVIEW CHECKLIST The UNCG Institutional Review Board is required to provide approval for all research projects conducted at UNCG, both funded and non funded. The School of Nursing IRB representative provides School approval for all protocols. The SON Research and Scholarship Committee provides initial review of projects submitted for OR receiving funding for scientific integrity and human subjects protection and protocols or requests for including SON students, faculty or staff in research. Normally, this review will be conducted by two members of the Committee and is intended to assist the PI in assuring human subjects protection and obtaining timely approval of the project. Reviewers should complete the checklist and address any items not met below. M=met, NM=not met M NM N/A M NM N/A M NM N/A M NM N/A M NM N/A M NM N/A M NM N/A 1. Clearly stated significance of the study. 2. Sampling plan, rationale for sample size, data access, and recruitment plans clearly discuss the inclusion/exclusion criteria and justification. Representation clearly evident for proposed purpose. 3. Human subjects protection clearly identified and appropriate for proposed sample. (Includes DHHS/NIH inclusion of women, children and minorities, and the 4 points addressed by NIH, if applicable. Address the Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) requirements as appropriate. 4. Data collection procedures consistent with purpose, questions/hypothesis and sample. 5. Analysis consistent with purpose, question/hypothesis and sample representation. 6. Plans for obtaining data (PHI) from HIPAA covered entities are specified. 7. Consent materials, tools, letters of access and recruitment materials are appropriate. Comments (please note item number ) *Grammatical errors (mark on application) Initiated 5/2002, revised 6/

148 III University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing DATA SAFETY MONITORING GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH The following are the School of Nursing guidelines for data safety monitoring for human subjects research and guidelines for authorship and ownership. In June 1998, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued a policy on data and safety monitoring ( that requires oversight and monitoring of all intervention studies to ensure the safety of participants and the validity and integrity of the data. The policy further elaborates that monitoring should be commensurate with risks and with the size and complexity of the trials. While the NIH policy is specifically directed to clinical trials, a DSMB may be appropriate if the studies have multiple clinical sites, are blinded (masked), or employ particularly high-risk interventions or vulnerable populations. The UNCG School of Nursing includes data safety and monitoring as part of its commitment to the assurance of human subjects protection in research. Also, the guidelines assist faculty, students and staff in the conduct of research. The annual SON review will consist of at least 50% of funded studies and 10% of all active protocols. Oversight within the SON does not replace or supersede the University Institutional Review Board (IRB) guidelines, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements, or special NIH /DHHS guidelines (e.g., NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules.) The Associate Dean for Research in collaboration with the SON Research and Scholarship committee chair will coordinate Data Safety and Monitoring activities. SON Research and Scholarship Committee members will conduct the reviews. In the event that SON committee members are not available due to conflict of interest, a designated faculty member from the SON or another academic unit on campus will be selected by the Associate Dean to conduct the review. All persons conducting reviews must hold doctoral degrees and have written confirmation of Human Subjects Protection certification filed with the SON Research Office. The IRB representative (or alternate) or the Associate Dean will provide an orientation, information and training session annually for reviewers. Principal Investigators will be notified of the pending review in writing (paper or electronic) or by personal contact. Faculty sponsors (if PI is a student) will be notified and are responsible to notify the student, provide access to materials and ensure compliance with procedures. Investigators should be aware that prior notice is not required to conduct the reviews, but every effort will be made to avoid conflicts with investigator s required course and meeting schedules. Investigators are expected to cooperate fully and in a timely manner with the reviews. Investigators should plan for annual review of: 142

149 1. Signed consent forms, confidentiality forms, and data forms, and storage of those items according to the approved protocol. 2. Sampling plan, recruitment efforts, and subject accrual information. 3. Documentation of any adverse events, expected or unexpected. 4. Adherence to data collection procedures. 5. Review of data, databases, data points and analyses. 6. Personal contact with data sources (including agencies and individual subjects) by reviewers to verify compliance with procedures. The checklist will be completed and a summary report will be written by the review member and forwarded to the Associate Dean. The Associate Dean will discuss any deficiencies or concerns with the PI and the SON IRB Representative (or alternate). A written summary of this discussion will be completed as part of the review report, as well as a written plan for removing or avoiding deficiencies. All reviews will be kept in a locked file in the SON Research Office. Summary reports will be available to the SON UNCG IRB Representative (or alternate). Deficiencies will be reported to the IRB SON Representative (or alternate) to discuss plans of action. The Associate Dean may provide reports to the IRB when the PI or IRB representative are not available or have not reported such to the IRB in a timely manner. The UNCG IRB may also request reports for any approved protocol. The SON IRB Representative (or alternate) or Associate Dean may suspend any study until IRB notification has taken place and a plan for assurance of correction of deficiencies is approved. It is the responsibility of the PI, in consultation with the UNCG IRB and Office of Compliance, to notify a funding agency of deficiencies and the plan of action. The consultation and notification should be documented in writing and a copy filed with the SON IRB Representative (or alternate) and Associate Dean. Review members will be required to maintain confidentiality for each protocol, associated data, and subject contact and review findings. Reviewers must also avoid conflicts of interest with protocols and reviews. If the PI has a concern that the review may cause or increase risks to human subjects, especially to confidentiality, the PI should notify the Associate Dean or SON IRB Representative (or alternate) prior to the initiation of the review. Assistance from the UNCG IRB and legal counsel will be sought to determine the most effective manner with which to conduct a review and remove or decrease any risk to subjects. A report will be filed annually with the UNCG IRB and the SON Research Office by the SON IRB Representative (or alternate). Initiated 5/2002; revised 6/2003; updated 10/2007; revised 2/

150 III University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing DATA SAFETY MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH The Data Safety Monitoring Checklist is completed, and a summary report written, by members of the Research and Scholarship Committee designated by the Associate Dean for Research to conduct such safety and compliance monitoring. The form and report is returned to the Associate Dean for Research. Study Title: IRB #: PI: Co-Investigator (s): Faculty Sponsor (for student research): Reviewer Date(s) of Review: Circle the appropriate letter. Explain any ratings of I or U. A= Adequate documentation/evidence of compliance I = Inadequate documentation/evidence of compliance U= Unclear, cannot be determined N/A= Not applicable A I U N/A 1. Signed consent forms and confidentiality forms are stored securely according to the approved protocol. A I U N/A 2. Sampling plan, recruitment efforts, and subject accrual information are consistent with the approved protocol. A I U N/A 3. Any expected or unexpected adverse events that have occurred during the conduct of the study, and actions taken in response to those events, are documented. Actions taken are consistent with the approved protocol. A I U N/A 4. Data collection procedures have adhered to an approved protocol. A I U N/A 5. Data, databases and data points and analyses are stored and handled securely according to the approved protocol. A I U N/A 6. Personal contact with data sources (including agencies and individual subjects) verifies compliance with procedures. Written summary: Briefly summarize your review processes (including the types of personal contacts you made) and findings of the review. Explain any ratings of I or U. Return the completed form and report to the Associate Dean for Research. Initaited 5/2002, revised 6/2003; 6/

151 University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORSHIP AND OWNERSHIP These guidelines are to assist faculty, students, staff and other persons in the assurance that credit, and acknowledgement of effort and responsibility for research, scholarship and creative activity, especially for funding, publications, and patents are appropriately assigned. Research, scholarship and creative activity is becoming an increasingly collaborative activity with both faculty, staff, students, consultants and agency personnel involved in the initiation, conduct and evaluation of projects. The dissemination and legal ownership should also reflect such collaboration. Several published guides provide insight into decisions of authorship and ownership. Two sources particularly important are: 1. The UNCG Guidelines for Good Practice in Graduate Education requires that faculty acknowledge student contributions to research presented at conferences, in professional publications, or in applications for copyright and patents. Likewise, students are expected to acknowledge the contributions of faculty advisors and other members of the research team to the student s work in all publications and conference presentations. Faculty, staff, students and collaborators are expected to maintain confidentiality and integrity of others work. ( 2. The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5 th ed.) a) Professionals take responsibility and credit only for work they have actually performed or to which they have contributed. b) Principal authorship and other publication credits accurately reflect the relative scientific or professional contributions of the individuals involved, regardless of their relative status. Mere possession of an institutional title, such as department chair, does not justify authorship credit. Minor contributions to the research or to the writing for publications are appropriately acknowledged, such as footnotes or in the introductory statement. c) A student is usually listed as principal author on any multiple-authored article that is based substantially on the students dissertation or thesis. (Pp ). Publication Credit: Authorship is reserved for persons who receive primary credit and hold primary responsibility for a published work. This encompasses not only those who do the writing, but who made substantial scientific contributions to the study. Substantial contributions may include formulating the problem or hypothesis, structuring the design, organizing and conducting the statistical analysis, interpreting the results or writing a major portion of the paper. Those who may not be listed as authors but who contributed in ways such as suggesting or advising about analysis, collecting or entering data, modifying or structuring computer programs, and recruiting participants or obtaining 145

152 GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORSHIP AND OWNERSHIP PAGE 2 access to data or animals. However, combinations of these and other tasks may constitute or justify authorship. (Pp ). Decisions of Authorship and Ownership The decisions of authorship should be made as early as possible in the research or creative activity process. Collaborators should determine each members contribution (noted above), what level (first, second, etc.) and the type (presentation, publication, copyright, patent, etc.) of authorship will be assigned. For example, often students participate in data collection or gathering materials to be used in a grant or manuscript. Though this may not constitute authorship on a publication, authorship on presentations may be granted. Likewise, assisting to develop a tool, method, computer program or such product that is used and which may tangentially result in a copyright or patent may not constitute authorship but may warrant ownership. Student research for an honors projects, a masters thesis/project, dissertation or directed research in which faculty are involved as a committee member or chair does not automatically award authorship to faculty members. If a student is using faculty data or data collected as part of a faculty members study/grant, this agreement should be determined at the initiation of the activity in writing. A second consideration is often ownership. One issue is data collected either prior to or after the conduct of a specific project. For example, if a faculty member has collected or obtained or has access to data that is used for a secondary analysis, authorship may include that faculty member but does not necessarily constitute first authorship. If students collect or obtain data that is later used for secondary analysis by other students, agency personnel, or faculty, the student should be included as an author. Another issue is if the data, method, or tool is deemed to be necessary for patent or copyright. Ownership should also reflect the contribution and effort of those involved. Legal statutes, university policies on copyright and ownership, state and federal work for hire/work product, copyright and patent laws, as well as ethical principles, may assist in these decisions. It is incumbent upon all involved to assess this possibility at the initiation of a project and consult technology transfer officers, legal counsel, and university/agency Institutional Review Boards. A third consideration is when the principal author does not follow through on dissemination or ownership efforts. In the event of the sudden incapacity or death, the principal author or investigator often remains first author. If not first author, the contributor should be an author in the order determined by the team with serious consideration of contribution. Similar consideration should be made for ownership decisions. In the event that a student or faculty member does not publish work that is co-authored by a faculty member, community or agency personnel, or another student, discussion should occur that allows the other authors to pursue dissemination that acknowledges the students contribution but allows credit for additional efforts to complete the dissemination effort. It is preferable that these discussions take place at the initiation of the study and that the contingencies be agreed to in writing. 146

153 GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORSHIP AND OWNERSHIP PAGE 3 The fourth issue is that all authors and owners assume accountability and responsibility for the integrity of the study, including but not limited to ethical treatment of human subjects and animals and accurate sampling, analyses, and reporting of results. The appropriate interpretation of the data is also expected. Thus, authors should have access to and review documents prior to submission for presentation or publication. Many journals require signature stating that each author is accountable and responsible for all conduct and content of publications. It is especially incumbent upon first authors and faculty members to protect students and other authors from fraud and scientific integrity concerns. If any issues arise, it is the responsibility of the first author to notify all other authors. Reassessing authorship and ownership may occur during the research process, if additional applications for funding are submitted, if persons efforts are not those expected and agreed upon (preferably in writing) or if required by funding application/guidelines. It is preferable that the decisions of authorship and ownership and decisions regarding dissemination are in written form and signed by all persons involved at the initiation of any project or program. Any alterations may be included in the original agreement or additional written agreements may be added as amendments. The Authorship/Ownership Agreement Form is available from the SON Research Office and is recommended for use. The Associate Dean for Research, the IRB representative and alternate, and the Research and Scholarship Committee chair and members are available for consultation. Additional information is available from the UNCG legal counsel and the technology transfer officer, as well as state and federal guidelines and statutes. Initiated 5/2002, revised 6/2003, updated 10/2007, revised 2/

154 III AUTHORSHIP/OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT FORM *Form should be on UNCG SON letterhead* DATE **March 18, 2002** **TITLE OF PROJECT/MANUSCRIPT** Principal investigator: Co-Investigators: Name, Credentials, PhD RN Name, Credentials MSN, RN Name, Credentials, BSN RN Graduate Student Name, Credentials, MN RN Graduate Student Name, Credentials, PhD RN All participants will be co-authors on any presentation or publication resulting from this project. Dr. xxxxx will be first author and Ms. xxxxx will be second author, unless otherwise negotiated with the group. (Alternative statement). In further dissemination efforts, the 2nd and 3rd authors will alternate in order. Any additions to or deletions from the participant list will be made through negotiation between the PI and other team members. The PI retains the rights and responsibilities for determining appropriate submission of abstracts and manuscripts for presentation or publication. Team members may serve as presenters through agreed upon formats. Data remains shared property of the PI (and others if deemed appropriate). All participants must abide by the UNCG Institutional Review Board and the US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines for human subjects and animal protection and scientific integrity. Signature date Signature date Signature date Signature date Signature date Initiated 5/

155 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING PROMOTION AND TENURE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES (Approved by School of Nursing Faculty, April 1998; Revised and approved by School of Nursing Faculty, April 2002; Revised and approved by School of Nursing Faculty, October 2004; April 2007 Revised and approved by the School of Nursing Faculty, April, 2011) The School of Nursing tenure criteria and procedures are in accordance with and subordinate to The Code of the University of North Carolina and to the following documents in the Handbook for Faculty: Regulations on Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Due Process, University-Wide Evaluation Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure, and Policy on Post-Tenure Review of The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. In accordance with these University policies, candidates for tenure and promotion in the School of Nursing must exhibit achievement in three areas: teaching, research and creative activity, and service. Throughout this document are direct references to the university Regulations on Academic Freedom, Tenure and Due Process indicated by the naming of individual sections and number reference to certain subsections of that document. This document describes the areas of achievement at each rank in the categories of teaching, research and creative activity, and service as they apply to the discipline of nursing, with expectations of continuous growth and productivity, and impact. TEACHING The primary function of the School of Nursing faculty is the education of nurses. The teaching role is fundamental to fulfillment of the University mission of providing excellence in undergraduate and graduate education; therefore, it is essential that teaching be given significant consideration in decisions of promotion and tenure. Research and creative activity, while important to the life of the University, do not have the central importance of teaching. Nursing faculty eligible for promotion and tenure should demonstrate their accomplishments as teachers in the classroom and clinical settings and their efforts to continually improve their teaching. RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITY As part of its mission, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro and the School of Nursing rewards research and creative activities that lead to the advancement of knowledge, support of teaching, application of innovation and entrepreneurship, and promotion of the application of knowledge for the benefit of society. The School of Nursing fosters the development of knowledge and inquiry among its students and faculty. Research and creative activities include all forms of discovery that contribute to knowledge development and utilization within the discipline of nursing,including interdisciplinary, trans-disciplinary and collaborative work.outcomes of research and creative activities enhance or revise disciplinary knowledge, impact various populations or organizations, or offer new theoretical insights.all faculty members are expected to engage in significant research or creative scholarly activities. 149

156 PROMOTION AND TENURE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES Page 2 SERVICE Academic and professional service is essential to creating an environment that supports scholarly excellence, meets the internal operational needs of the School of Nursing, and promotes nursing practice throughout the University, the region, state, nation, and world. Therefore, service activities are an important part of the faculty role, and are integral to promotion and tenure.high levels of faculty service on University and School committees maintain the integrity and coordination of the nursing curriculum. Faculty involvement in community, professional, and discipline-specific organizations is important to advance the practice of nursing and influence health care delivery. 4/98; 4/02; 10/04; 8/06; 4/07; 5/11 150

157 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING (Approved by School of Nursing Faculty, April 1999; Revised and approved by School of Nursing Faculty, April 2002; Edited and approved by School of Nursing PTR Committee (without changes or amendments), April 2004 Revised and approved by School of Nursing Faculty, March 2005) Revised and approved by the School of Nursing Faculty, April 2007 Revised and approved by the School of Nursing Faculty, April 2011) Revised and approved by the School of Nursing Faculty, April 2012) Revised and approved by the School of Nursing Faculty, April 2013) Guidelines for Appointment, Promotion, Tenure, Reappointment, and Post-Tenure Review 1 The review procedures followed by The School of Nursing conform to TheCode of The University of North Carolina and to the following UNCG documents: "University-Wide Guidelines for Promotions and Tenure," "Promotion, Tenure, Academic Freedom and Due Process Regulations and and Policy on Post-Tenure Review. I. Regulations for Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure A. Persons holding the following faculty ranks are eligible for probationary term appointments or permanent tenure: Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor. B. Appointment, reappointment, promotion, and permanent tenure shall be awarded on the basis of demonstrated professional competence, potential for future contribution, public service that is professionally related, and the needs and resources of the School of Nursing and the University. C. Faculty members shall be evaluated annually in the areas of teaching, research and creative activity, and service, at least at the department level. In the evaluation of faculty, explicit recognition must be given to the primary importance of teaching, as required in Administrative Memorandum 338. For tenured and tenure-track faculty below the rank of professor, the Department Chair will issue an annual call for any input which faculty in the department wish to provide regarding the individual s progress towards criteria for promotion and/or tenure. Additionally, individuals seeking tenure and/or promotion may request that the Department Chair solicit written feedback on his/her progress toward the criteria based upon current curriculum vitae and any other materials the individual provides, from senior members of the department. In all cases, feedback will be given to the Department Chair rather than directly to the faculty member. This input will be used to inform the Department Chair s evaluation of the faculty member s progress toward promotion and/or tenure. 1 The School of Nursing Promotion, Tenure, Reappointment, and Post-Tenure Review Committee shall be referred to as School of Nursing P&T Committee. 151

158 D. All components of the review process are considered to be confidential. II. Policies for Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion and Tenure. A. The School of Nursing s promotion and tenure guidelines are provided to probationary faculty members and candidates for employment as detailed in 2.D.i. of the University document on Promotion, Tenure and Academic Freedom, and Due Process Regulations. B. All tenure-track and tenured faculty members below the rank of Professor, shall receive written, clear and considered annual feedback from their department head on their progress toward promotion and/or tenure. This feedback must be informed by input from departmental faculty members senior to the person being reviewed, and must be consistent with the policiesset down here (section 2 of theregulations), the evaluation criteria in the University Guidelines for Promotions and Tenure, and the clear and specific criteria specified in the School of Nursing promotion and tenure documents. C. Evaluation of eligible faculty for promotion and/or tenure must take place no later than the times specified in section 3, and must follow the procedures in section 4University document on Promotion, Tenure and Academic Freedom, and Due Process Regulations. D. The department chair shall consult annually with faculty as indicated to consider all full-time faculty below the rank of Professor for promotion and/or permanent tenure. E. In all instances where the department chair or department faculty decides to recommend reappointment,promotion and/or permanent tenure, the department chair shall consult with the Dean and submit the recommendations. The Dean shall consult with the School of Nursing Review Committee, which will review these recommendations. The Dean shall make the text of the recommendations to the Provost, including the supporting reasons, available in a secure location for the perusal of the members of the School of Nursing P&T Committee. F. The Dean shall forward the candidate s materials to the Provost, includingthe Dean s recommendations and reports that summarize the results of the School of Nursing reviews. G. The Chancellor may recommend that a faculty member be promoted or granted permanent tenure at any time. If the Chancellor recommends that a faculty member be hired with permanent tenure, then the tenured associate and full professors of the hiring department will deliberate and vote on whether to grant tenure to the candidate for the position in question. The recommendation of the tenured faculty will then be forwarded to the Dean, the Provost, and the Chancellor for consideration. H. With respect to the academic ranks and positions, the School of Nursing promotion and tenure policies are as follows: 152

159 1. Assistant Professor (a) In all cases an Assistant Professor shall be appointed to an initial term of four years. (b) At least twelve months before the initial term of appointment as Assistant Professor expires, the department chair, after assembling 2 and consulting with the tenured associate and full professors of the department faculty and receiving the result of their independent deliberation and vote, shall notify the candidate of thedepartment's decision: (1) not to reappoint the candidate at the expiration of his current term; or (2) to recommend to the Chancellor that the candidate be reappointed to a further term of three years; or (3) to recommend to the Chancellor that the candidate be reappointed with permanent tenure at the same or higher rank. The Dean, after consultation as above with the tenured associate and full professors of the School of Nursing faculty and receiving the result of their independent deliberation and vote, shall notify the candidate of the School s decision as above. (c) At least twelve months before an Assistant Professor has completed seven continuous years of full-time service at that rank in this School, the department chair, after consultation as provided above, shall notify the candidate of the department's decision: (1) not to reappoint the candidate at the expiration of the current term; or (2) to recommend to the Chancellor that the candidate be reappointed with permanent tenure at the rank of associate professor upon the expiration of the aforementioned seven years' service. The Dean, after consultation as above with the tenured associate and full professors of the School of Nursing faculty and receiving the result of their independent deliberation and vote, shall notify the candidate of the School s decision as above. (d) When the department s recommended action is to reappoint to a further term of three years, review by the unit and university promotion and tenure committee is not required. Instead, the recommendation of the departmental faculty, including a record of their vote, and the independent recommendation of the department head shall be conveyed, along with a copy of the faculty member s current CV, to the dean for review. The dean shall send his or her recommendation, along with a copy of the faculty member s CV, to the chancellor for a final decision on reappointment. The role of the chancellor is laid out in section 4.D. of the University Promotion, Tenure, Academic Freedom, and Due Process Regulations. (e) When the department recommends not to reappoint, all provisions of the unit and university reviews shall be followed, except that the documentation 2 Assembling refers to the actual physical presence of the tenured faculty. However, if there are extenuating circumstances that prevent a particular tenured faculty member from being physically present, then that faculty member may participate by real-time electronic means, such as speakerphone or video conferencing, with prior approval of the Dean. Such use of electronic means for participation during the deliberation process does not modify any other requirements for the vote. 153

160 forwarded from the department need only consist of the recommendation of the departmental faculty, including a record of their vote, the independent recommendation of the department head, and a copy of the candidate s current CV. The candidate may submit additional documents that support his or her reappointment. These documents are submitted to the dean, and are for consideration by the unit and university committees on promotion and tenure, the dean, and the provost. (f) At least twelve months before an Assistant professor has completed seven years of full-time service at that rank in this institution, the candidate shall be reviewed for promotion and tenure, and a decision rendered. The procedures in section 4 shall be followed. (g) Notice of appointment or reappointment shall be in writing from the Chancellor. Notice of non-reappointment shall be in writing from the Chancellor. Notification of a decision not to reappoint shall be made in an unelaborated written statement of the decision with reference to the appropriate processes of appeal laid out in the relevant School of Nursing and University regulations. The written statement shall be a hard copy letter conveyed by a method of delivery that requires a dated signature by the addressee.failure to give timely notice of non-reappointment shall oblige the University to offer a terminal appointment of one academic year. (h) If an untenured Assistant Professor declines the review for reappointment and/orpromotion and tenure as required above, the candidate should write to the department chair in advance of the review period indicating that the candidate will not prepare any materials for review and that the candidate understands that employment will end at the conclusion of the current term appointment. Failure to participate in the review as specified above will be deemed to constitute resignation and withdrawal of any request for reappointment at the end of the current probationary contract. The department chair shall acknowledge this in writing, with a copy to the Dean and Provost. 2. Associate Professor (a) An Associate Professor promoted to that rank within this institution shall have permanent tenure. (b) An Associate Professor appointed to that rank from outside the institution may be appointed to a probationary term up to five years, or with justification, may be appointed with tenure. (c) In cases where an Associate Professor is being considered for hire with tenure, the tenured faculty of all ranks, including the department head, of the hiring department will deliberate and vote on whether to recommend the granting of tenure to the candidate for the position in question. The departmental recommendation will be forwarded to the dean, who will forward it to the provost and the chancellor for action. 154

161 (d) If hired for a probationary term, before the end of the penultimate year of that term, the Associate Professor shall be reviewed for tenure and/or promotion, and a decision rendered. The procedures in section 4 shall be followed. If tenure is not awarded, the Associate Professor s employment shall end at the conclusion of his or her probationary term contract. (e) Notice of appointment or reappointment shall be in writing from the Chancellor. Notice of non-reappointment shall be in writing from the department chair or the Chancellor, depending upon where the decision is made not to reappoint. Notification of a decision not to reappoint shall be made in an unelaborated written statement of the decision with reference to the appropriate processes of appeal laid out in the relevant School of Nursing and University regulations. The written statement shall be a hard copy letter conveyed by a method of delivery that requires a dated signature by the addressee.failure to give timely notice of non-reappointment shall oblige the University to offer a terminal appointment of one academic year. 3. Professor A. Review for Promotion to Professor (a) The department head, or a majority of the Professors among the department faculty, may recommend a tenured Associate Professor for promotion to Professor at any time. (b) If requested by the candidate, the department must conduct a formal review for promotion beginning no later than August 1 of the seventh year following conferral of tenure. The candidate shall write to the department head requesting review for promotion no later than the preceding March 1, and the department shall follow the procedures described in section 4. The department head shall acknowledge the candidate s request in writing, with a copy to the dean and provost. This is not a mandatory review in that a candidate may choose not to request review. A decision not to request review does not preclude a candidate from choosing to be reviewed in any subsequent year. (c) If a review of an Associate Professor for promotion to Professor is unsuccessful, the candidate may next request a review during the third year of service following notice of their unsuccessful bid, by writing to his or her department head as described in 3.E.iii.b. The review will begin no later than August 1st of the following year (the fourth year following notice of his or her unsuccessful bid). This is not a mandatory review in that a candidate may choose not to request review. A decision not to request review does not preclude a candidate from choosing to be reviewed in any subsequent year. The department may, of course, recommend the candidate for promotion earlier, as specified in 3.A.a. B. Appointment and Review of Professors (a) A Professor promoted to that rank within this institution shall have tenure. 155

162 (b) A Professor hired at that rank from outside the institution will normally be appointed with tenure, but may, with justification, be appointed to a probationary term of up to five years. (c) In cases where a Professor is being considered for hire with tenure, the tenured faculty of all ranks, including the department head, of the hiring department will deliberate and vote on whether to recommend the granting of tenure to the candidate for the position in question. The departmental recommendation will be forwarded to the dean, who will forward it to the provost and the chancellor for action. (d) If appointed for a probationary term, before the end of the penultimate year of that term, the Professor shall be reviewed for tenure, and a decision rendered. The procedures in section 4 shall be followed. If tenure is not awarded, the Professor s employment shall end at the conclusion of his or her probationary term contract. III. Procedures in Regard to Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure A. Structure 1. The School of Nursing shall have a standing committee on promotion and tenure composed of all tenured faculty members, which will serve to evaluate individual candidates. 2. The School of Nursing shall ensure two levels of faculty review with one being the candidate s department review and one being the School of Nursing review. 3. A faculty member eligible to vote for promotion and/or tenure shall vote only once on a candidate s promotion and/or tenure at the earliest level of review. If serving on the candidate s department review committee, that faculty member shall participate in the final deliberations and vote only at the department review, though that faculty member may participate in the evidence-gathering phase at the School of Nursing Review Committee if invited to do so. 4. The candidate s department chair and Dean shall not be present during the final deliberations or votes of the candidate s department or School of Nursing review committees on promotion and tenure. The work of committees on promotion and tenure shall be divided into an evidence-gathering phase and a deliberative phase. The candidate s department chair and Dean may be invited by the appropriate committee to participate in the evidence-gathering phase of the process. When that phase of the process is determined to be over by a majority of the review committee, the candidate s department chair and Dean shall leave the committee and the deliberative phase will proceed. B. Sequence of Review 1. Except as provided in section 4.A.ii., below, all recommendations will move through 156

163 all stages of review to the chancellor, regardless of negative reviews or recommendations against approval the portfolio may have received at various stages in the process. 2. Nominations receiving all positive or all negative reviews by the department faculty, the department head, the unit s Committee on Promotions and Tenure, and the dean will not normally be reviewed by the University Committee on Promotions and Tenure; however, the provost may require that any nomination be reviewed by this committee. 3. The candidate may, at his or her discretion, withdraw his or her portfolio from consideration at any stage of review before it is submitted to the chancellor for a final decision. 3 C. Departmental review In all instances where a candidate is reviewed for reappointment, promotion and/or tenure, the candidate s department head, after assembling and consulting with the tenured members of the department faculty senior 4, to the candidate in rank and receiving a summary of their independent deliberation and vote, shall notify the candidate of the department s recommendation (see 4.B.i.b.). 1. The meeting of the faculty members must be preceded by the preparation of the descriptive section of the candidate s portfolio, and by an appropriate analysis of this information by the department so that the assembled faculty members can make an informed decision on the qualifications of the candidate. External review (see section 4.B.i.c.) of the candidate must be part of this analysis The meeting of the faculty members shall be presided over by a chair, who is not the head, whose duties include assuring that the meeting is divided into evidencegathering and deliberative phases, conducting a secret ballot, counting the votes, preparing a written summary of both majority and dissenting opinions, forwarding the summary and the results of the vote to the Head, and ensuring that all present sign the appropriate page of the Promotion and Tenure Form. The department head may not be present during the deliberative phase and vote of the faculty members, but may participate in the evidence-gathering phase. 3. Departmental recommendations not to reappoint, promote and/or grant tenure only occur when the majority of the voting faculty and the head concur in this decision 3 No decision has been rendered when a portfolio is withdrawn before it is submitted to the Chancellor. The actions of the department, unit and university committees are merely recommendations. All decisions are made by the chancellor. In this sense, this provision might be interpreted as allowing a candidate more than one attempt at tenure. However, if a candidate withdraws his or her portfolio during the penultimate year of his or her probationary term, his or her employment will end at the conclusion of that term. Withdrawal of a candidate s portfolio during a review for promotion that does not involve tenure, has no adverse consequences for the candidate. 4 This section does not apply to review of Assistant Professors for reappointment at the end of their first probationary term. 157

164 based on their independent reviews. In all other cases the recommendation of the department must be to reappoint, promote and/or grant tenure. 4. Except as specified in 3.D.ii.a.(1), external review, usually in the form of a minimum of three letters, is required prior to the vote of the departmental faculty (see 4.B.i.a.). The candidate may submit the names of up to four potential reviewers to the department head for consideration. Potential reviewers may not include individualswith conflicts of interest in objectively evaluating the candidate s portfolio (e.g.dissertation mentors, close collaborators, post-doc supervisors, etc. The departmenthead shall consult with the faculty senior 4,8 to the candidate in rank, assemble a list of no fewer than four additional potential reviewers, and select no fewer than threereviewers from the combined list. The list of selected reviewers shall contain no less than one name submitted by the candidate. 5. Review of the candidate must be consistent with the clear and specific unit and departmental criteria for promotion and tenure, and reflect the feedback that the candidate has received in his or her annual reviews (2.D.ii.) and, in the case of tenured faculty in their post-tenure reviews, regarding promotion and tenure The department head forwards the department s recommended action, a summary of faculty deliberations, including the number of faculty votes for and against a nomination, his or her independent evaluation of the candidate, and the candidate s complete portfolio, to the next, unit level of review. 7 Too few faculty of the appropriate rank In cases where the dean believes there are so few faculty of the appropriate rank in the candidate s department that an adequate departmental review cannot be conducted, the dean will consult with the department head and the candidate in the selection of the review committee. A minimum of three faculty senior 4,8 to the candidate are normally necessary to assure adequate review. If agreement between these parties is reached, a memorandum of agreement signed by all parties will specify the composition of the review committee. If, following the consultation specified above, the dean determines that agreement cannot be reached, the dean, with the approval of the provost, will specify the composition of the committee. 8. Addition of material to a portfolio during departmental review Descriptive material may be added to a candidate s portfolio, either by the candidate or the department, at any time prior to the departmental vote. Following the departmental vote, the only types of descriptive information that may normally be added by the candidate or the department are: (a) status updates on works (publications, grants, exhibitions, awards, and etc.)that 5 For assistant professors being reviewed for promotion and tenure, the review should also reflect any feedback they received at the end of their first probationary term. 8 In case of Professors appointed to probationary terms, the faculty members eligible to vote are tenured Professors. 158

165 are already cited in the portfolio; for instance, the status of works submitted for review but not yet reviewed at the time of the departmental vote; (b) recognitions or awards that were not anticipated when the portfolio was initially assembled (c) a document written by the candidate in reaction to the departmental review and evaluation (d) This document may be inserted at the candidate s discretion in response, for instance, to the presence of a dissenting opinion or a poorly prepared evaluative section. This document is not a mandatory component of the portfolio. 6 (e) Evaluative material may be added to the candidate s portfolio at any time before it is submitted to the dean for review by the School of Nursing committee on promotion and tenure. 9. Right of faculty members to express dissenting opinions (a) In cases where the recommended action of the department is not supported by a unanimous vote of the faculty senior to the candidate, the faculty member(s) who did not vote in accordance with the recommended action may, at their discretion, (b) include a signed statement in the candidate s portfolio explaining their vote and the reasons why they feel that the recommended action should not be upheld. D. School of Nursing Review Committee. The School of Nursing Review Committee for a candidate for reappointment, promotion and/or tenure shall be composed of tenured associate and full professors of the School of Nursing who were not eligible to vote at the candidate s department review. The dean shall consult with the School of Nursing Committee on promotion and tenure, which will review the recommendations and documents submitted by the department. (a) The School of Nursing Review Committeeshall review the candidate s materials independently. The School of Nursing Review Committee shall elect a chair, who is not the dean, whose duties include assuring that the meeting is divided into the evidence-gathering and deliberative phases, concluding the evidence-gathering phase by a vote of the committee to close this phase, conducting a secret written ballot on the suitability of the candidate, counting the votes, preparing a written summary of both majority and dissenting opinions, and forwarding the summary and the results of the vote to the dean. The dean may not be present during the deliberative phase and vote of the faculty members, but may participate in the evidence-gathering phase. The School of Nursing Review Committee Chair may request in writing, information or clarification from a candidate, if the material submitted is incomplete or nonspecific. (b) The School of Nursing Review Committee Chair s responsibilities further include ensuring that the Chair and all present sign on the appropriate form, and that the Dean receives a detailed written summary of the views of the assembled faculty, including the bases for both positive and negative votes. 159

166 (c) The Dean shall be responsible for notifying the candidate of the recommendations from the School of Nursing reviews, and for adding the recommendations to the candidate s materials. (d) The Dean will forward his or her recommendation, the independent summary of the committee s recommendation provided by the chair of the unit committee, including the number of faculty votes for and against a nomination, and the candidate s portfolio, to the provost for review by the University Promotion and Tenure Committee (see 4.A.ii for the exception of all positive reviews). (e) Addition of material to a portfolio during unit review Descriptive material of the following types (4.B.ii.c.(1)(a) - 4.B.ii.c.(1)(c) may be added to a candidate s portfolio, either by the candidate or his or her department, during the unit review. Other types of descriptive material may not normally be added. (1) status updates on works (publications, grants, exhibitions, awards, and etc.) that are already cited in the portfolio; for instance, the status of works submitted for review but not yet reviewed at the time of the unit vote; (2) recognitions or awards that were not anticipated when the portfolio was initially assembled; (3) a document written by the candidate in reaction to the unit evaluation. This document may be inserted at the candidate s discretion in response, for instance, to the presence of a unit review that the candidate considers factually inaccurate. This document is not a mandatory component of the portfolio Following his or her review, the Dean shall make the text of his or her evaluation available in a secure location for the perusal of the candidate and members of the unit Promotion and Tenure Committee. 6 The intent of this section is to allow the candidate to respond to the evaluative section of the dossier submitted by the department. This response is not intended to be a place where the candidate can put forward additional material that is not already cited in the descriptive section of his or her portfolio. All relevant aspects of the candidate s work should have been included in the materials submitted to the department for review. However, he or she may choose to draw attention to certain aspects of the portfolio that were over looked in the departmental review. The candidate s department head is responsible for assuring that the candidate has access to the departmental evaluative sections of his or her portfolio, and has a minimum of three days to prepare his or her response 7 The intent of this section is to allow the candidate to respond to the evaluative materials added to his or her dossier by the unit. The response is not intended to be a place where the candidate can put forward additional material that is not already cited in the descriptive section of his or her portfolio. All relevant aspects of the candidate s work should have been included in the materials submitted to his or her department for consideration. The dean is responsible for assuring that the candidate has access to the unit evaluative documents with a minimum of three days to prepare his or her response. 160

167 IV. Guidelines for Candidates A. In addition to annual consultation with the department chair, the candidate is encouraged to seek consultation from the department chair at least six months prior to the submission of the candidate s reappointment or promotion and tenure documents. B. The Office of the Provost determines the time line for submission of the reappointment materials. However, candidates should be aware that reappointment materials generally need to be submitted to the candidate s department chair by mid- October of the academic year in which the candidate seeks reappointment. C. The Office of the Provost determines the time line for submission of the promotion and tenure materials. However, candidates should be aware that a completed promotion and/or tenure document needs to be submitted to the department chair by the first day of fall classes of the academic year in which the candidate seeks promotion and tenure. D. The Departmenthead shall consult with the faculty senior to the candidate in rank, assemble a list of no fewer than four additional potential reviewers, and select no fewer than three reviewers from the combined list. The list of selected reviewers shall contain no less than one name submitted by the candidate. E. Review of the candidate must be consistent with the clear and specific School of Nursing criteria for promotion and tenure, and reflect the feedback that the candidate has received in his or her annual reviews (2.D.ii.) and, in the case of tenured faculty in their post-tenure reviews, regarding promotion and tenure. 1. All external reviews are included in the candidate s promotion materials and are available for review by department and School of Nursing review committees. F. The candidate may be asked to provide clarification of information in the materials by the Department or School of Nursing Review Committees. G. The candidate may clarify and update information in the reappointment or promotion and/or tenure materials by submitting a dated addendum to the department chair or Dean for insertion at the front of the materials. 4/7/99; 4/02; 5/04; 5/05; 8/06; 4/07; 5/09; 9/09; 5/11 161

168 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING EVALUATION GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE Assistant Professor Teaching Assistant Professor 1) Scope of Teaching: Documents effective teaching Documents contributions to curriculum development and evaluation 2) Examples of Documentation of Teaching Effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Demonstrates a comprehensive grasp of nursing and area of specialization Submits proposals for intramural funding for curriculum/faculty development Develops, reviews, redesigns and evaluates courses and teaching materials Serves as an academic advisor for students Facilitates student learning in practicums, internships, service learning and experiential learning activities Demonstrates provision of assistance to less experienced faculty members Develops instructional materials for academic courses Serves on thesis committees; serves as advanced nursing project advisor Certified by an appropriate professional association as a specialty expert Directs students in the delivery of nursing care Uses evaluations from students, peers and administration to improve teaching effectiveness Implements effective education with patients, families, communities or professional groups Assistant Professor Research & Creative Activities 1) Scope of Research & Creative Activities: Demonstrates investigative engagement in a focused area of science Disseminates research and other data based findings Documents contribution to disciplinary knowledge 2) Examples of Documentation of Effectiveness of Research & Creative Activities (may include, but are not limited to the following): Participates in research seminars Presents scholarly papers based on referred abstracts to local or state professional organizations Presents evidence-based research at professional meetings Submits and publishes papers in referred professional journals Submits and publishes refereed chapters in scholarly texts 162

169 Creates scholarly work in non-print media (video, online refereed journals, webcast, etc.) Engages in collaborative research Submits research proposals for funding Critiques research abstracts for local and regional professionals/scholarly organizations Assistant Professor Service 1) Scope of Service Demonstrates increasing service commitment to the School, University, profession and community 2) Examples of Documentation of Service Activity Effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following: Participates at the local/regional level of a professional clinical or health-related organization Engages with community groups and clinical agencies related to health and education Participates in student activities Collaborates on position papers for the general public Contributes to economic and community development activities Submits proposals to seek internal or external funds for service efforts Involves self and students in activities related to health/health policy, including professional association activities service Participates in planning and policy development for local health services Participates in School and University committees and task forces 163

170 EVALUATION GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE Associate Professor Associate Professor Teaching 1) Scope of Teaching Documents mastery in teaching Integrates scholarship in teaching and curricular development 2) Examples of Documentation of Teaching Effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Assumes leadership role in curriculum development, implementation and evaluation of classroom and clinical courses Generates ideas and/or initiates experiences for the development of faculty as teachers Presents invited lectures Designs student learning activities for practicums, internships, service learning and experiential learning Receives awards for excellence in teaching Authors papers, book chapters, textbooks, manuals, electronic media, workbooks, etc. for use as a teaching/learning tools Seeks external funding for curriculum/program development Evaluates the teaching of colleagues Fosters collaborative student or community scholarship Chairs thesis committees; serves in dissertation committees Mentors students in professional development Develops study abroad opportunities Associate Professor Research & Creative Activities 1) Scope of Research & Creative Activities Documents clearly defined program of research and creative activities Demonstrates leadership in a focused area of research or creative activity Applies for external funding to support research or creative activities Disseminates outcomes of research and creative activities program in refereed format Influences disciplinary knowledge 164

171 2) Examples of Documentation of Effectiveness of Research & Creative Activities (may include, but not limited to the following): Assumes a leadership role in the investigation of problems relevant to specialty area Mentors faculty and students in research and in other scholarship Engages in interdisciplinary, trans-disciplinary, or collaborative research Engages in entrepreneurial activities Develops innovative solutions that address clinical procedures and practices Disseminates community engaged research through public programs Presents scholarly papers at regional and national professional meetings Authors scholarly works such as: articles in refereed journals, books, book chapters and monographs; papers in refereed conference proceedings Submits grant proposals to external funding sources Serves as consultant to nursing, health-care organizations, governmental bodies, and other entities Serves as reviewer for refereed journals and texts Critiques research abstracts for national and international professional meetings Serves as a grant reviewer for external sources Serves as an external evaluator for promotion and tenure Associate Professor Service 1) Scope of Service Demonstrates leadership in or makes significant contribution to the School, the University, profession, and community 2) Examples of Documentation of Service Activity Effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Participates at the local/regional level of a professional, clinical or health related organization Engages with community groups and clinical agencies related to health and education Collaborates on position papers for the general public Submits proposals to seek internal or external funds for service efforts Involves self and students in activities related to health/health policy, including professional association activities and local health services Serves as a reviewer for professional journals and organizations Develops published clinical procedures and practices Assumes leadership on School and University committees and task forces Serves as a mentor to faculty, students, alumni and/or community members Maintains professional certification with relevant clinical practice 165

172 Serves on interdisciplinary local, state or regional task forces, commissions and committees that relate to nursing and health Leadership in economic and community development activities Applies for external funding at local/regional level for service-related program of scholarship Conducts continuing education workshops Provides for student mentorship within the service learning environment Participates on student projects related to scholarship of service Uses professional expertise to shape policy, to plan, and to direct health services, state, or national levels Demonstrates competence in implementing new systems of delivery of health service or in improving health to the public Receives honors and rewards in recognition of significant contributions Writes external reviews of the work of colleagues for promotion and tenure 166

173 Teaching EVALUATION GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE Professor 1) Scope of teaching Documents excellence in teaching Documents leadership in curriculum and program development and evaluation 2) Examples of Documentation of Teaching Effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Serves as a resource in teaching in the School, other academic units, agencies or institutions Provides curriculum consultation to other academic units, agencies or institutions Serves as distinguished visiting professor at other institutions of higher learning Receives national recognition for excellence in teaching or contributions to nursing education Obtains extramural funding for curriculum/program development Chairs dissertation committees Serves on dissertation committees in other academic units or institutions Provides curriculum leadership at university level Serves on national/international committee related to education Serves as program evaluator for accrediting body Research & Creative Activities 1) Scope of Research & Creative Activities Recognized as a distinguished scholar within a defined area of science Demonstrates leadership in science Mentors scientists Leads efforts in dissemination of research outcomes Shapes disciplinary knowledge 2) Examples of Documentation of Effectiveness of Research & Creative Activities (may include, but are not limited to the following): Serves as a leader in scholarship Receives national recognition from professional peers and colleagues Receives external funding Documents engaged scholarship Directs interdisciplinary, trans-disciplinary, or collaborative research Serves as grant reviewer for national or international funding sources Serves as editor or editorial board member of refereed journals Edits or co-edits books, journals or other scholarly publications Assumes responsibility for sustaining and developing the discipline 167

174 Service Presents scholarly papers or chairs a symposium at national or international professional meeting Authors scholarly works such as: articles in refereed journals, books, book chapters and monographs; papers in refereed conference proceedings Receives signal honors (e.g., fellow status in the American Academy of Nursing, Gerontological Society of America, American Academy of Nurse Practitioners); awards from national or international professional organizations, (Fulbright award) Engages in entrepreneurial endeavors in area of scholarship 1) Scope of Service Recognized as an expert who makes significant contributions to the School, the University, profession, and community 2) Examples of Documentation of Service Activity Effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Holds elected office in a state, regional, national or international professional nursing or health-related organization Serves as an appointed member of regional or national boards, committees or task forces Collaborates and consults with schools, industry and civic agencies Testifies before the legislature and congressional committees Writes external reviews of the work of colleagues for promotion and tenure Leads collaborative endeavors between two or more departments, schools, universities or community-based agencies Continuously receives internal/ and/or external funding for service-related program of scholarship Directs student projects related to the scholarship of service Mentored students are consistently recognized for service-related contributions Develops and implements interdisciplinary student service-related experiences Uses professional expertise to shape policy, to plan, and to direct health services at local, state, national levels or international 168

175 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Reappointment Form Name of Person Being Reviewed: Present Rank: Requested Action: Reappointment at Current Rank TO BE COMPLETED BY DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Date: The faculty of the Department Review Committee, assembled as required in the School of Nursing Guidelines for Promotion, Tenure, and Reappointment Procedures, voted as follows with respect to the Requested Action listed above: We have reviewed the material for this candidate for reappointment review. Assembled Faculty Chair, TO BE COMPLETED BY SCHOOL OF NURSING REVIEW COMMITTEE Date: The faculty of the School of Nursing Review Committee, assembled as required in the School of Nursing Guidelines for Promotion, Tenure, and Reappointment Procedures, voted as follows with respect to the Requested Action listed above: We have reviewed the material for this candidate for reappointment review. Assembled Faculty Chair, Department Recommendation: For Reappointment Against Reappointment School Recommendation: For Reappointment Against Reappointment March

176 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Procedures for Post-Tenure Review Definition and Purpose: The definition of Post-Tenure Review (PTR) is "a comprehensive formal periodic evaluation of cumulative faculty performance, the prime purpose of which is to ensure faculty development and to promote faculty vitality." The purpose of PTR is to (1) sustain and facilitate excellence among tenured faculty by recognizing, encouraging, and rewarding faculty performance; and (2) foster faculty development in the areas of teaching, research, service, and directed professional activity by evaluating all aspects of professional performance and by acknowledging progress in specific areas and identifying specific activities which can be undertaken if improvement is needed. Post-Tenure Review is required of all tenured School of Nursing faculty. The PTR builds on annual reviews, and should take place no less frequently than every five years. The School of Nursing policies and procedures for PTR comply with the UNCG Policy on Post-Tenure Review. The Post-Tenure CumulativeReview Process: I. Responsibilities of School of Nursing Promotion and Tenure (P&T) Committee A. Composed of at least three (3) tenured faculty and excluding the candidate s department chair. B. Review of candidate materials will take place during the Spring Semester according to the promotion and tenure timetable published by the Provost's office. C. Review the materials submitted by the candidate. D. Request information or clarification from a candidate if the material submitted is incomplete or nonspecific. E. Evaluate the candidate in the areas of teaching, research, service, and directed professional activity (when applicable). F. Vote to categorize the candidate s overall professional performance as being either Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory, and record on the UNCG Report Form. 1. Record the signatures of all present on the UNCG Report Form. 2. Attach a detailed summary of positive and negative views, if the decision was not unanimous. G. Submit the UNCG Report Form and the summary of positive and negative views (when applicable) to the Dean, to be forwarded to the Office of the Provost. H. The Dean will communicate the results of the PTR to the candidate. II. In the case of an Unsatisfactory review, the procedures described in the Regulations on Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Due Process, Section V. and the UNCG Policy for Post- Tenure Review will be implemented. 170

177 III. Responsibilities of the PTR Candidate A. The Office of the Provost determines the time line for submission of post-tenure review materials. However, applicants should be aware that post-tenure review materials generally need to be submitted to the Chair of the School of Nursing P&T Committee by the beginning of April of the academic year in which the applicant is scheduled for review. B. Submit cumulative review materials to the School of Nursing P&T Committee: 1. UNCG Post Tenure Review Form. 2. Annual Faculty Evaluations by Department Chair from last 5 years, including the year in which the cumulative review takes place. 3. Current Curriculum Vitae. 4. Any other supporting materials (this item is optional). 4/1/99; 4/04; 10/04; 3/05;8/06; 08/13 171

178 172

179 173

180 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Clinical Track Document Preface III The Clinical Track Document has been designed to identify appropriate ranks and criteria for initial appointment, reappointment, and promotion of non tenure track faculty. Faculty who hold appointments as lecturers or visiting assistant professors may elect to apply for a clinical track position. Appointments on the clinical track are not available for tenure track faculty. The roles and responsibilities of clinical track faculty reflect a strong commitment to classroom and clinical teaching, nursing practice, service, and scholarship related to nursing practice and/or education. The focus of faculty on the clinical track is classroom and clinical teaching as well as service to the School/University and the community. Scholarship expectations begin at the clinical assistant professor rank and reflect as a commitment to applied nursing research as well as the dissemination and utilization of findings. Appointments to the clinical track may range in length from 1 to 5 years. A minimum of a master's degree in nursing and 2 years of clinical practice are required for appointment to a clinical track position. Further, applicants must meet the N. C. Board of Nursing Educational Requirements. In order to be appointed/reappointed to a particular rank, faculty must fulfill the majority of criteria in each area at that rank. To be promoted to a higher rank, faculty must show evidence of fulfilling the majority of criteria in each category at that rank. The criteria for clinical instructor, assistant professor, associate professor, and professor as well as the appointment, reappointment, and promotion procedures follow. 03/10 174

181 CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT/REAPPOINTMENT III Clinical Instructor Earned Masters in nursing required. Minimum of 2 years of recent experience in nursing practice. Experience in teaching at the baccalaureate level or above preferred. Must meet the qualifications for faculty required by the NC Board of Nursing Teaching 1. Scope of teaching and practice: Demonstrates competence in a clinical specialty area. Provides quality didactic or clinical instruction for students. Demonstrates basic competence in teaching. 2. Examples of Documentation of Teaching Effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following) Maintains an atmosphere conducive to learning as shown by administrative, peer, and student evaluations of classroom and/or clinical teaching. Provides evidence of having comprehensive, current practice knowledge on area of specialization through practice, certification, professional memberships, and/or professional consulting. Seeks opportunities to develop teaching skills. Participates in student advising. Acts as a liaison to clinical agencies and works with faculty to develop and maintain appropriate clinical opportunities within the agency. Service: 1. Scope of service: Engages in the work of the School of Nursing, the profession, and the community. 2. Examples of Documentation of Service Activity Effectiveness (may include but are not limited to the following): Attends and participates on School of Nursing committees. Attends and participates in course planning and evaluations. Actively participates as a member of a professional organization at a local level. Volunteers for community events. Scholarship: 1. Scope of scholarship/creative activities: Contributes to utilization of evidence based practice. 175

182 2. Examples of documentation of Effectiveness of Scholarship and Creative Activities (may include, but are not limited to the following): Integrates evidence based knowledge in teaching and practice. 03/10 176

183 CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT/REAPPOINTMENT III Clinical Assistant Professor Earned Masters in nursing required. Minimum of 3 years of recent experience in nursing. Experience in teaching at the baccalaureate level or above. Must meet the qualifications for faculty required by the NC Board of Nursing. Teaching 1. Scope of teaching and practice: Demonstrates a broad scope of teaching abilities Demonstrates active involvement in curriculum and program development Demonstrates mastery in area of specialization 2. Examples of Documentation of Teaching Effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Demonstrates mastery in a clinical specialty Mentors students and/or less experienced faculty in the clinical faculty role Develops collaborative educational ventures with other faculty and/or clinicians (i.e. workshops, classes, learning materials, teaching strategies) Serves as an academic advisor for students completing honors and independent study Develops, implements, evaluates and revises courses and teaching materials Chairs clinical and/or classroom courses Teaches classroom content in area of expertise Service: 1. Scope of service: Serves on University and SoN committees Serves in professional and community organizations 2. Examples of Documentation of Service Activity Effectiveness (may include but are not limited to the following): Participates on committees in SoN Participates on committees in clinical agencies Participates in professional organization Participates in community organization Participates on University committees Participates in curriculum and/or program development Scholarship: 1. Scope of scholarship/creative activities: Demonstrates leadership in utilization of evidence based practice 177

184 03/10 2. Examples of documentation of Effectiveness of Scholarship and Creative Activities (may include, but are not limited to the following): Facilitates scholarly activities of students and/or peers in the clinical area Promotes evidence based practice and research utilization in the area of specialization Disseminates evidence based practices 178

185 CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT/REAPPOINTMENT III Clinical Associate Professor Earned Masters in nursing required. Minimum of 5 years of recent experience in nursing. Experience in teaching at the baccalaureate level or above. Must meet the qualifications for faculty required by the NC Board of Nursing. Practice expertise expected of a seasoned faculty member. Teaching 1. Scope of teaching and practice: Contributes to the development of curriculum in area of practice expertise. Mentors others in teaching. Excels in teaching. Recognized as an expert in area of practice. 2. Examples of teaching and practice effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Receives above average teaching evaluations by peers and students and administrators. Develops innovative teaching materials for education and/or creates innovations in teaching methodology. Demonstrates expertise as evidenced by at least one of the following: Advanced specialty certification Regional, national or international recognition Consultation in area of expertise. Receives a Teaching Excellence Award. Service: 1. Scope of service: Takes leadership role in School and/or University committees. Takes leadership roles in professional and/or public organizations. 2. Examples of service effectiveness (May include, but are not limited to the following: Participates in professional organizations at the regional, state or national level relevant to the practice area. Demonstrates leadership in community service. Makes a contribution to the institution through active University committee membership. Takes leadership roles and actively participates in the School of Nursing committees. Serves as leader of Committees or Task Force. Scholarship: 179

186 1. Scope of scholarship: Demonstrates leadership in development and utilization of evidence-based practices. Provides leadership in clinical scholarship. 2. Examples of documentation of Effectiveness of Scholarship and Creative Activities (may include, but are not limited to the following): Guides incorporation of Evidence Base Practice into the curriculum. Makes presentations in areas of specialization to local, state, regional, or national arenas. Submits book chapters for publication. Submits articles for publication based on areas of clinical specialization. Serves on committees or as consultant to groups composing standards of practice, procedures, or protocols in practice facilities. 03/10 180

187 CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT/REAPPOINTMENT III Clinical Professor Earned Masters in nursing required. Earned doctorate recommended. Minimum of 7 years of recent experience in nursing. Experience in teaching at the baccalaureate level or above. Must meet the qualifications for faculty required by the NC Board of Nursing. Practice expertise expected of a seasoned faculty member. Teaching: 1. Scope of teaching and practice: Demonstrates excellence in teaching. Mentors faculty. Demonstrates leadership role in curriculum/program development. Receives outstanding teaching evaluations. 2. Examples of teaching and practice effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Serves as an expert resource in teaching. Receives awards for excellence in teaching and/or practice. Serves as a reviewer for journal/book proposals in the area of clinical specialization. Serves as a consultant in area of clinical specialization. Serves on theses and dissertations committees. Service: 1. Scope of service: Recognized as a leader in University and School activities. Recognized as an expert leader by professional and public organizations. 2. Examples of service effectiveness (may include, but are not limited to the following): Holds elected office in state, national, or international professional nursing or health related organizations. Assumes leadership to organize groups for social action related to issues of health education and welfare. Serves as an appointed member of local, regional or national boards, committees, or task forces. Serves in a leadership role on School and University committees. Serves as a collaborator and/or consultant with schools, industry and/or civic agencies at the local, state, regional, national or international level. Scholarship: 1. Scope of Scholarship and Creative Activities: Recognized as a leader in nursing education or clinical specialty Contributes to knowledge development and/or dissemination of scholarship. 181

188 Provides leadership in clinical scholarship. 2. Examples of documentation of Effectiveness of Scholarship and Creative Activities (may include, but are not limited to the following): Provides leadership in the School for scholarly activities in the community/clinical setting. Presents scholarly papers at professional meetings at local, state, and regional meetings. Has scholarly or creative work accepted for publication. Participates in the collection of data and dissemination of nursing research. Reviews research proposals for funding. Participates on research teams. Edits or co-edits books, journals or other scholarly publications. Collaborates with clinical agencies to enhance systems for evidence-based practices. 03/10 182

189 Appointment and Reappointment Procedures for the Clinical Track III 1. Non tenure track faculty may apply in writing to their Department Chair requesting placement on the clinical track, reappointment or promotion 2. Faculty will indicate the rank for which application is being made. 3. Faculty will provide written evidence of fulfillment of the criteria of teaching and practice, service, and scholarship at the rank for which application is made. 4. Three letters of reference from peers documenting fulfillment of criteria at said rank should be included for initial appointment and promotion to another rank. 5. Department Chairs will submit to the Dean of the School of Nursing a written critique of teaching and practice, service, and scholarship as delineated in the candidate's application for initial appointment or reappointment. A written statement from the Department Chair will accompany the critique and include recommendation of rank and term of appointment. 6. For promotion, the Department Chair will submit a written critique of teaching and practice, service, and scholarship along with the application materials to an Advisory Committee of clinical track faculty members appointed by the Dean. The Advisory Committee will review the materials and make a recommendation to the Dean of the School of Nursing. 7. Final decision on rank and term of appointment will be made by the Dean of the School of Nursing. 8. The Dean of the School of Nursing will notify the candidate in writing of the decision. changed at AAC 2/9/10 183

190 STUDENTS' SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS III Immunizations and Clinical Requirements For immunizations required of all students, see UniversityBulletin. Nursing students must also have chicken pox immunization or positive titre and mumps verification, an annual tuberculin Mantoux test; annual flu shot or signed declination, Hepatitis B series and positive titre (see Bulletin). Immunizations, medical tests, including CPR certification, urine drug screen and expanded criminal background check required of upper department baccalaureate nursing majors in practicum courses are also listed in the Bulletin, in materials accompanying the letter of acceptance into the nursing major, and are reiterated in a handout distributed to the junior class at the end of the spring semester. Master's students need to have the same immunizations and meet the same clinical requirements as undergraduate students. SeeUniversity Bulletin. Master's students need Rubella titre if clinical experiences will be in obstetrics areas and if required by agency. Students may not participate in practicum courses until evidence of all immunizations, tests, screenings and CPR certification have been submitted to the School. Malpractice Insurance All undergraduate students (basic and RN) and graduate students enrolled in the Administration and Education concentrations must purchase the group policy. Graduate students in the Adult/Gerontological Nurse Practitioner concentration must purchase a personal policy (see below). Students in the Anesthesia clinical courses are covered by the residency program to which they have been admitted. Group Policy (academic year coverage) The policy covers both BSN and MSN nursing students (exclusions to the policy are listed below). The group policy does not cover (1) students in the MSN Nurse Anesthesia concentration or MSN Nurse Practitioner program, (2) students for part-time work or work during vacations since it applies only while in clinicalexperiences related to nursing courses, and (3) any student following graduation. A/GNP Practitioner students may contact Dr. Randolph Rasch for information and an application to purchase liability insurance for practitioner students. RN Licensure Proof of unrestricted NC licensure or licensure by a state covered by the Nurse Licensure Compact is required of all registered nurse students in the School of Nursing. 8/91;7/00;7/03; 7/05; 8/09 184

191 III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING POLICY ON UNSAFE PRACTICE The Policy on Unsafe Practice and Policy on Dismissal of Students who Present Physical and/or Emotional Problems that Do Not Respond to Treatment are published in the UNCG Policies for Students and The Undergraduate Bulletin for undergraduate students. The policies for graduate students are published in The Graduate School Bulletin

192 PART IV PROCEDURES 186

193 ACADEMIC PROCEDURES IV A formal faculty or student complaint is one that follows the University complaint policies and procedures. Therefore, a faculty formal complaint is one directed to the University Due Process or Grievance Committees. A student formal complaint is a formal Grade Appeal or Academic Integrity Board Submission. The policies and procedures for these processes are defined by the University and are available on the University web sites for the Provost s Office, Registrar s Office and Dean of Students. As follows: and 1. Course load recommendations for students 2. Adding and dropping courses 3. Withdrawal from the University 4. Class Attendance regulations a. There is a Class Attendance Notice that permits the instructor several options, including dropping a student from a course for nonattendance. A paper version of this form is available in the Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study s Office, or Faculty may go to their secure site on UNCGenie and give a grade of W to a student. If using the latter approach, it is important to contact the student to notify the student that s/he has been dropped for non-attendance. 5. Grading Policies, including Incompletes and Removal of Incompletes, and Appeals a. The form for awarding or removing an incomplete can be found in the Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study s or Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study s office b. Grades are not mailed to students, but are available to students on the web through UNCGenie 6. Final examinations 7. Dean s List and Chancellor s list 8. Academic good standing at the University 9. Appeals guidelines for various kinds of academic appeals 187

194 ACADEMIC PROCEDURES Page University Placement exams 11. Graduation with Honors Additional School of Nursing guidelines: Posting grades Grades from unit exams, finals, and final grades may be posted by the course leader. Student ID numbers are not to be used to post grades publicly. Practicum Final Exam 1. Final evaluation conferences stand in lieu of final examinations in practicum courses. 2. Final grades for practicum courses should not be sent to theregistrar s Office until after the final conference has been held. If a student leaves campus at the end of the semester before the final conference the grade will be submitted as an INCOMPLETE. This statement is included on the practicum course overview. 3. A student must complete all practicum assignments before the final evaluation conference. 4. Evaluation conferences may not be initiated by faculty to be held on Reading Day. Unsatisfactory Progress 1. Faculty members may notify student verbally or in writing any time a student s test performance is unsatisfactory 2. Grade Warning Reports may be issued to students any time a faculty member feels a student s performance is unsatisfactory. a. These forms may be found in the Forms cabinet, or a faculty member may prefer to issue the warning in the form of a written memo, contract, or other format. b. Grade warnings can also be sent through the on-line system Starfish. 3. Copies of any written grade warning should be sent to a. The Office of the Director of Undergraduate Advising to be filed in the student s record, b. Course Leader c. Department Chair d. Student s advisor. Rev.8/91;7/02;7/03; 6/09 188

195 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Procedure for Requesting Clinical Sites Selection of clinical sites to meet the learning objectives of a course requires coordination between the clinical faculty, the course chair, the department chair, and the faculty liaison for the agency. The exact procedure for requesting a clinical site varies from agency to agency, but clinical faculty should always discuss the potential site with the course and department chairs. Clinical sites at most hospitals in the Triad area are reserved through either the Forsyth Clinical Coordinating Committee (FCCC) or the Joint Committee for Clinical Resource Planning (JCCRP). Department Chairs serve as the School s representatives to FCCC and JCCRP. Sites at agencies scheduled through both committees are typically reserved a year in advance; clinical faculty should work with their department chairs to request sites in FCCC or JCCRP. FCCC coordinates clinical sites at Wake Forest Baptist Health, Ardmore Day Hospital, Sticht Center, Brenner Children s Hospital, Best Health Hanes Mall, and Downtown Health Plaza in Winston Salem. Information about FCCC, including the clinical site usage calendars, can be found at Novant Health agencies, which include Forsyth Medical Center, Whitaker Rehab, and Medical Park Hospital, participate with FCCC but maintain their own calendars, which can be found at al_rotation_calenders/. The updated JCCRP calendar for Alamance Regional Medical Center, High Point Regional Health Center, and Randolph Hospital can be found at AGlfKOzbmKjJPyW783SsiUwKZiFciId5mmRy. Agencies in the Cone Health System meet with JCCRP but maintain their own clinical calendars, which can be viewed at Cone Health agencies include Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, Annie Penn Hospital, Behavioral Health Center, Women s Hospital, Wesley Long Hospital, MedCenter Kernersville, MedCenter High Point, and a number of clinics and other sites listed at The form for requesting a clinical site in the Cone Health system follows, and is also at Click on Clinical Request Form-set. Clinical faculty should check with their department chairs before submitting requests for Cone Health clinical sites: department chairs coordinate requests to ensure that multiple faculty don t request the same site on the same day. Clinical sites at smaller agencies such as health departments, physician offices and clinics are typically coordinated by the Faculty Liaison to the agency. Faculty Liaisons should always be informed of use of all planned use of their agencies as clinical sites. 7/2011; 7/

196 IV GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING WORD PROCESSING/COPYING TO FACULTY SECRETARIES All materials to be word processed, duplicated and/or collated, and distributed must be accompanied by a department color-coded "Work Request" form with complete instructions. These forms are stored in Room 223 (please keep a supply in your office) and are available from the faculty secretaries. requests and attachments are also accepted with complete instructions clearly stated in the . Due to the small number of staff members in relation to the size of the faculty and the student body, it is important that materials be submitted in accordance with the deadlines listed below. WORK SUBMITTED ON OR PRIOR TO DEADLINES WILL TAKE PRIORITY OVER ANY WORK SUBMITTED LATE OR WITHOUT SPECIFIC DUE DATE (e.g. ASAP). It is helpful to have work submitted electronically or on jump drive. Please indicate file name(s) in or on work request sheet if jump drive is used, to ensure secretaries know which is the correct file. DEADLINES FOR SUBMISSION FOR WORD PROCESSING: Course Syllabus and Course Packet Fall semester July 15 Spring semester December 1 Exams/Tests One hour working days Two hour working days Course materials have priority. Faculty requests for other word processing/copying need to be made as far in advance as possible. Please be reasonable. Legibility - The staff cannot assume responsibility for deciphering handwriting or spelling. If materials are not legible or reasonably sequential and formatted, they will be returned. DEADLINES FOR SUBMISSION OF COPYING: Same Day (limited to 10 copies of 4-5 pages) For very involved copying please allow a minimum of 5 days. Copying published materials - one copy, for personal use only, according to copyright law. (Copyright guidelines are in your faculty secretary's office and also posted at each copy machine.) PLEASE DO NOT ASK ANY SECRETARY FOR COPIES WHILE YOU WAIT. If you need instant copies, please go to one of the copies in the SoN: 117, 311, and 403. If rooms are locked; key opens them all. August 1, 2002, nc, forms\workreq.gdl; 6/03; 7/12 190

197 IV THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING CRITERIA FOR TEACHING EXCELLENCE AWARD In an effort to recognize and reward teaching excellence, the School of Nursing at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro seeks qualified applicants for the Teaching Excellence Award. The purpose of the award is to recognize excellence in teaching by a full time School of Nursing faculty member who has been employed by the School of Nursing for at least three years. Faculty rank is not a consideration. A faculty member who has received the award is not eligible for nomination of the subsequent five years. The faculty being nominated must have at least one letter of nomination and at least one letter in support of the nomination, addressing the seven award criteria below. The nominations and letters of support may be made by faculty and/or students and must be signed. These letters should be submitted via hard copy or electronically to the Chair of the Teaching Excellence Award Committee by the designated date. Nominees will be notified by the committee Chair and asked to submit a teaching portfolio addressing the seven award criteria listed below. Required Documentation: Include the following required documentation. (Note: Required letters of nomination and support will be added to the teaching portfolio by the TEA committee chair at the time of the review.) 1. Statement of personal teaching philosophy and methods used to achieve teaching goals Include an example of how these are demonstrated in one specific course. (Three pages maximum) 2. List of courses taught in the last three years 3. Narrative summary supporting how the seven award criteria below have been met, if not previously addressed in the teaching philosophy (Three pages maximum). Solicited or unsolicited letters or comments on teaching may be added. 4. Student, peer, and administrative evaluations of teaching for the last three years (summary of numerical ratings, compilation of narrative comments) 5. One page summary of how student, peer, and administrative evaluations have been used to evaluate, improve, or enhance teaching strategies Award Criteria: In determining teaching excellence, emphasis will be placed on written evidence supporting the following criteria: 1. Outstanding success in facilitating student learning and active engagement 191

198 CRITERIA FOR TEACHING EXCELLENCE AWARD Page 2 2. Evidence of innovation and creativity in teaching 3. Establishment and maintenance of high academic standards 4. Success in facilitating academic and professional development in students (e.g. mentoring and advising students, student organizations, projects) 5. Use of student and faculty feedback to evaluate, improve, or enhance teaching strategies 6. Substantial influence on the quality of students educational experience, recognizing students diverse abilities, interests, and learning styles 7. Demonstrates leadership in teaching (e.g. curriculum development, mentoring faculty, interdisciplinary contributions, publications and presentations related to teaching) The winner of the School of Nursing Teaching Excellence Award is automatically nominated for the next academic year s UNCG Alumni Teaching Excellence Award, and will be notified of their nomination by the UNCG Teaching Excellence Committee. The criteria for this award are: a. Outstanding success in facilitating student learning (including consistent success in making complex ideas and concepts understandable and meaningful to the students) b. Evidence of innovation and creativity in teaching c. The establishment and maintenance of high academic standards d. Support for the academic and professional pursuits of students (including mentoring and advising students) e. Demonstrated leadership in teaching (including disciplinary, departmental, and university wide contributions, presentations, and publications) Amended 4/15/00; 4/23/03; 6/05; 6/06; 10/06; 4/11 192

199 IV THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING Avahleen Cain Staff Excellence Award The Avahleen Cain Staff Excellence Awardhas been established to recognize a member of the staff of the School of Nursing who provides outstanding leadership and service to the School and to the University through the following: 1. Demonstrating commendable dedication to duty 2. Exhibiting high professional standards 3. Excelling in his/her position 4. Demonstrating excellence in leadership 5. Furthering the mission of the School of Nursing and UNCG The award is presented at the annual School of Nursing Holiday Luncheon in December. The name of the recipient is inscribed on a plaque that hangs permanently in the lobby of the School of Nursing. The recipient also receives an individual certificate of recognition and a monetary award. Eligibility Criteria: SPA and EPA Non-faculty employees are eligible for nomination after two years of full-time service to the School.A staff member who has received the award is not eligible for nomination again for the subsequent five years. Nomination Procedures: The nomination form is available from the Office of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Study (NMOR 118), and must be submitted by the stated deadline each fall. Both faculty and staff may submit nominations, and are encouraged to submit nominations for staff members whom they feel are deserving of this award. Each nomination from must be signed by the nominator and a second faculty or staff member. Selection Process: The Dean appoints a selection committee each year composed of faculty and staff who represent a variety of roles within the School. Committee members are not nominees for the award, do not serve as direct supervisors for any nominees, and have not made a nomination for the award. 12/

200 Criterion Number UNCG School of Nursing Systematic Program Evaluation Plan for (To be completed by April 2014) Criterion Person(s) Expected Timeframe Method for Aggregate Responsible to Level of for Assessment Results for Collect Data Achievement Evaluation This Year 1. The mission/philosophy and program outcomes of the nursing education unit are congruent with the core values and mission/goals of the governing organization. 2. The governing organization and nursing education unit ensure representation of the nurse administrator and nursing faculty in governance activities; opportunities exist for student representation in governance activities. Curriculum Committee Administrative Advisory Committee Congruence of concepts between School of Nursing mission and University mission Representation by all groups in governance activities as appropriate Every 4 years Annually at AAC Retreat Comparative analysis of School and University mission statements Assessment of SON committee membership listing for nurse administrator, faculty, and student membership Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 3. Communities of interest have input into program processes and decision-making. Administrative Advisory Council Representation of Advisory Board members, alumni, and major Annually Assessment of Advisory Board, Curriculum Committee, and Evaluation 194

201 Criterion Number Criterion 4. Partnerships that exist promote excellence in nursing education, enhance the profession, and benefit the community. 5. The nursing education unit is administered by a nurse who holds a graduate degree with a major in nursing and is doctorally prepared. 6. The nurse administrator is experientially qualified, meets governing organization and state requirements, and is oriented and mentored to the role. Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Dean, Associate Deans, Department Heads, Directors and Faculty Provost and Faculty Provost and Faculty Expected Level of Achievement healthcare representatives on SON Committees Several active education, professional, and community partnerships with SON Dean holds a graduate degree in nursing and is doctorally prepared Dean s credentials reflect administrative experience, criteria for rank of professor, and NCBON requirements for RN Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Annually Method for Assessment Committee minutes for input by community representatives Assess SON annual report for numbers of contracts, affiliations, and community partnerships Assessment of credentials of dean in UNCG Bulletins Assessment of credentials in relation to P&T guidelines, NCBON licensure listing and opportunities for orientation and mentoring Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 195

202 Criterion Number Criterion 7. When present, nursing program coordinators and/or faculty who assist with program administration are academically and experientially qualified (Baccalaureate and Masters). Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Dean, Associate Deans, Department Heads, and Directors Expected Level of Achievement licensure and faculty status. Mentoring by senior level administrators. 100% of program administrators are qualified Timeframe for Evaluation Biannually assessed as faculty teaching assignments are made by Department chairs Method for Assessment Faculty credentials, national guidelines, and SON Organizational structure are examined Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement When present, nursing faculty who coordinate or lead program options/tracks are academically and experientially qualified (Clinical doctorate). 8. The nurse administrator has authority and responsibility for the development and administration of the Provost and Faculty Dean of the SON has authority for SON and has time and resources to Annually Dean is evaluated biennially by Provost s office; a web based survey is 196

203 Criterion Number Criterion program and has adequate time and resources to fulfill the role responsibilities. 9. The nurse administrator has the authority to prepare and administer the program budget with faculty input. 10. Policies for nursing faculty and staff are comprehensive, provide for the welfare of faculty and staff, and are consistent with those of the governing organization; differences are justified by the goals and outcomes of the nursing education unit. 11. Distance education is congruent with the Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Provost and Faculty Supervisors in School of Nursing Curriculum Committee Expected Level of Achievement fulfill the responsibilities Dean has authority to prepare SON budget with faculty input 100% compliance with University policies for EPA faculty and staff and SPA staff for general policies; specific policies found in SON Faculty Handbook for faculty Distance education Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Assessed every 4 years Method for Assessment sent to faculty for their input on performance. Budget input from faculty is assessed through AAC, Plenary Faculty and Learning Resources minutes Examination of EPA and SPA policies and implementatio n with employees; assessment of specific policies in SON Faculty Handbook Evaluation of mission by Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 197

204 Criterion Number Criterion mission of the governing organization and the mission/philosophy of the nursing education unit. 12. Full-time faculty hold a minimum of a graduate degree with a major in nursing; a minimum of 25% of the full-time faculty also hold an earned doctorate or are currently enrolled in doctoral study (baccalaureate). Full-time faculty hold a minimum of a graduate degree with a major in nursing; a minimum of 50% of the full-time faculty hold earned doctorates or are Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Dean, Department Heads and tenured faculty for tenure track positions Dean, Department Heads and tenured faculty for tenure track positions Expected Level of Achievement congruent with UNCG and SON missions and philosophy At least 25% of full-time faculty members teaching at undergraduate level will hold an earned doctorate and all hold one graduate degree in nursing At least 50% of full-time faculty teaching at master s level will hold an earned doctorate and Timeframe for Evaluation or sooner if warranted Faculty credentials are reviewed when faculty are hired; Dept. Heads assess credentials of faculty needed to teach at particular levels each semester when teaching assignments are made See above Method for Assessment Curriculum Committee members Review of credentials in University Bulletins; review of teaching assignments in UNCGenie Review of credentials in University Bulletins; review of teaching assignments in UNCGenie Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 198

205 Criterion Number Criterion currently enrolled in doctoral study (master s). Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Expected Level of Achievement all hold one graduate degree in nursing Timeframe for Evaluation Method for Assessment Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement Full-time faculty hold a graduate degree with a major in nursing; a minimum of 75% of the full-time faculty hold earned doctorates (Clinical doctorate). Dean, Department Heads and tenured faculty for tenure track positions At least 75% of full-time faculty hold an earned doctorate and all hold one graduate degree in nursing See above Review of credentials in University Bulletins; review of teaching assignments in UNCGenie 13. Part-time faculty hold a minimum of a graduate degree with a major in nursing (baccalaureate). Part-time faculty hold a minimum of a graduate degree with a major in nursing; a Dean and Department Heads Part-time faculty hold a graduate degree in nursing ; at least 50% are doctorally prepared for master s teaching and Faculty credentials are reviewed when faculty are hired; Dept. Heads assess credentials of faculty needed to Review of faculty vita and transcripts 199

206 Criterion Number Criterion minimum of 50% of the part-time faculty hold earned doctorates or are currently enrolled in doctoral study (master s). Part-time faculty hold a minimum of a graduate degree with a major in nursing; a minimum of 75% of the part-time faculty hold earned doctorates or are currently enrolled in doctoral study (Clinical doctorate). 14. Faculty (full- and part-time) credentials meet governing organization and state requirements (baccalaureate). Faculty (full- and part-time) credentials reflect expertise in their area(s) of teaching Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Deans and Department Heads Expected Level of Achievement 75% for the DNP Meet UNCG NCBON, and certifying board requirements appropriate to their areas of teaching Timeframe for Evaluation teach at particular levels each semester when teaching assignments are made Upon appointment and annually Method for Assessment Assessment of transcripts, registered nurse licensure, certification, APRN recognition by the NCBON, and courses or continuing education related to Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 200

207 Criterion Number Criterion and advanced practice certifications when required (master s). Faculty (full- and part-time) credentials reflect expertise in their area(s) of teaching and advanced practice certifications when required (clinical doctorate). 15. Preceptors are academically and experientially qualified, oriented, mentored, and monitored, and have clearly documented roles and responsibilities. 16. The number of fulltime faculty is sufficient to ensure Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Dean, Department Heads, Directors, and Faculty Dean, Department Heads, and Expected Level of Achievement Preceptor utilization appropriate to meet program outcomes; prepared at level of degree seeking student or higher; oriented, mentored and monitored by course chair and faculty Faculty numbers sufficient for Timeframe for Evaluation Each semester Each semester Method for Assessment nursing education required by NCBON as appropriate Analysis of preceptor vitae and use of NCBON guidelines for preceptor roles in the course Assessment of faculty numbers each Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 201

208 Criterion Number Criterion that the student learning outcomes and program outcomes are achieved. 17. Faculty (full- and part-time) maintain expertise in their Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Directors Dean and Department Heads Expected Level of Achievement teaching load of 4 courses per semester for those teaching at the undergraduate level and 3 courses per semester for those teaching at the master s and doctoral levels, with a release of one course per year for the latter for dissertation committee work; NONPF and AANA guidelines followed for APRNS; NCBON faculty-student clinical ratio from NCBON followed for pre-licensure All faculty meet criteria for teaching, Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Method for Assessment semester when teaching assignments are made for the following semester Faculty document outcomes in Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 202

209 Criterion Number Criterion areas of responsibility, and their performance reflects scholarship and evidence-based teaching and clinical practices. Expected faculty outcomes in teaching, scholarship, service, and practice are congruent with the mission, goals, and expected student outcomes. 18. The number, utilization, and credentials of staff and non-nurse faculty within the nursing education unit are sufficient to achieve the program goals and outcomes. 19. Faculty (full- and part-time) are oriented and mentored in their areas of responsibility. Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Dean, Associate Deans, Department Chairs and Directors Dean, Associate Deans, Department Chairs, and Directors Expected Level of Achievement scholarship, and service appropriate to their tenure or clinical track and rank; practice is integrated into each of these areas Non nursing faculty and EPA and SPA staff meet program goals and outcomes All full-time faculty receive an orientation and are assigned to a mentor; all Timeframe for Evaluation Non nursing faculty and EPA staff are evaluated annually and SPA staff are evaluated biannually Annually or more often if mid-year hiring is conducted Method for Assessment teaching, scholarship, and service on their personnel report forms Evaluated according to policies and performance plans established for EPA and SPA employees Assessment of faculty orientation meeting agenda for full time faculty Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 203

210 Criterion Number Criterion 20. Systematic assessment of faculty (full- and part-time) performance demonstrates competencies that are consistent with program goals and outcomes. 21. Faculty (full- and part-time) engage in ongoing development and receive support for instructional and distance technologies. 22. Policies for nursing students are congruent with those of the governing organization, publicly accessible, non-discriminatory, Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Dean and Department Heads Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, FTLC, DCL, Department Chairs, and faculty Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Associate Dean for Graduate Expected Level of Achievement part-time faculty are oriented and mentored by department and/or course chairs All faculty performance reflects the expected roles for tenure or clinical track faculty All faculty engage in ongoing development according to their areas of responsibility Congruence of policies or differences justified by the SON Timeframe for Evaluation At least annually; faculty set goals and are evaluated based on those goals Annually Annually before Bulletins are published Method for Assessment and interview of department heads for orientation and mentoring of new part-time faculty Assessment of faculty goals, self-evaluation, peer evaluation, student evaluation, and administrative evaluation Annual faculty personnel report forms Comparative analysis of SON and University policies; analysis by faculty for any Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 204

211 Criterion Number Criterion and consistently applied; differences are justified by the student learning outcomes and program outcomes. 23. Public information is accurate, clear, consistent, and accessible, including the program s accreditation status and the ACEN contact information. 24. Changes in policies, procedures, and program information are clearly and consistently communicated to students in a timely manner. 25. Student services are commensurate with the needs of nursing Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Expected Level of Achievement 100% accurate information on written and website materials All changes communicated to students in writing in a timely way Student service needs are met for campus and Timeframe for Evaluation Continuously with some changes delayed for annual printing of publications After changes are approved, all students are informed in writing through new editions of the bulletins or letters or s sent to them Continuous evaluation Method for Assessment needed revisions of SON policies Review of all information found in brochures, websites, bulletins, and etc. for consistency If changes are made that have an impact on the student s progression in a program, they receive a letter and sign that they have received the information. Other changes are documented in the Bulletins Faculty and student requests for Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 205

212 Criterion Number Criterion students, including those receiving instruction using alternative methods of delivery. 26. Student educational records are in compliance with the policies of the governing organization and state and federal guidelines. 27. Compliance with the Higher Education Reauthorization Act Title IV eligibility and certification requirements is maintained, including default rates and the results of financial or compliance audits. 28. A written, comprehensive student loan repayment program addressing student loan information, counseling, monitoring, and Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Programs and Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Deans, Graduate School and Office of the Registrar Office of Financial Aid Office of Financial Aid Expected Level of Achievement distance students 100% Compliance 100% Compliance 100% accurate information on website related to student loan repayment program Timeframe for Evaluation Continuous evaluation Annually Annually Method for Assessment services and evaluation of services on end of program surveys Assessment of compliance with policies for educational records Assessment of student loan repayment rates and compliance audits as appropriate Assessment of FA website for student loan repayment program information Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 206

213 Criterion Number Criterion cooperation with lenders is available. 29. Students are informed of their ethical responsibilities regarding financial assistance. 30. Financial aid records are maintained in compliance with the policies of the governing organization, state, and federal guidelines. 31. Records reflect that program complaints and grievances receive due process and include evidence of resolution. Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Office of Financial Aid Office of Financial Aid Associate Deans and Dean of Students Expected Level of Achievement 100% accurate information on website related to ethical responsibilities for receiving FA 100% compliance with policies guiding FA records 100% of complaints receive due process and show evidence of resolution Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Method for Assessment Assessment of FA website for students ethical responsibilities for receiving FA Congruence of FA record practices with policies of governing organizations Continuously Appeal of grades to the dept head or higher is conducted according to due process and resolved; appeals for academic integrity follow due process and are resolved. Reported Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 207

214 Criterion Number Criterion 32. Orientation to technology is provided, and technological support is available to students. 33. Information related to technology requirements and policies specific to distance education are accurate, clear, consistent, and accessible. (A method of verification for identity is in place for online students.) Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Instructional Technology Consultant and other technology staff DCL, Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, and faculty Expected Level of Achievement All students receive orientation to technology required for instruction; all students have technological support available. The DCL website and online program brochures contain up-todate requirements for technology; With the blended approach, online students are viewed in class and appear on camera through Collaborate; Unique usernames/pass Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Each semester Method for Assessment annually at AAC retreat. Interview with ITC and evaluation of end of program surveys for assessment of technological support for students Faculty check that RN license and criminal background checks have been completed through Graduate Program Assistant s office. Students meet face to face and through Collaborate where personal identify can be viewed. Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 208

215 Criterion Number Criterion 34. The curriculum incorporates established professional standards, guidelines, and competencies, and has clearly articulated student learning outcomes and program outcomes consistent with contemporary practice (baccalaureate). The curriculum is congruent with established standards for master s/postmaster s programs or clinical doctorate programs, including appropriate advanced nursing Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Deans, Curriculum Committee, and Faculty Expected Level of Achievement words for Blackboard, RN licenses and Criminal Background checks also verify identity. All program outcomes consistent with professional standards and guidelines and contemporary practice Timeframe for Evaluation Annually, biannually, and every 4 years according to the identified assessment method Method for Assessment Program standards are evaluated annually on SON website; standards are assessed each semester in course syllabi; faculty evaluate standards periodically in Council meetings and through Curriculum reviews every 4 years Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 209

216 Criterion Number Criterion practice competencies, rolespecific professional standards and guidelines, and certification requirements, and has clearly articulated student learning outcomes and program outcomes consistent with contemporary practice (master s and clinical doctorate). 35. The student learning outcomes are used to organize the curriculum, guide the delivery of instruction, direct learning activities, and evaluate student progress. Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Expected Level of Achievement Timeframe for Evaluation Method for Assessment Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement The curriculum is logically structured to achieve expected individual and aggregate student outcomes. 210

217 Criterion Number Criterion Baccalaureate Nursing Inquiry Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement 90% of BSN and RN-BSN students will complete the NUR440 and NUR470 practicum experiences and journal/log entries and 80% will express satisfaction on EOP survey for Nursing. 90% of BSN and RN-BSN students will complete the NUR350 and NUR473 EBP/ Research project and 80% will express satisfaction on EOP survey for Inquiry. Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Method for Assessment Grades for practicum experiences/ journal entries and Likert Scale ratings on EOP survey question. Grades for EBP/Research projects and Likert Scale ratings on EOP survey question. Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 211

218 Criterion Number Criterion Practice Master s Nursing Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement Three-year national mean on NCLEX or above and 90% first time passage rate for UNC General Administration and 50 th percentile or above on NLN Achievement Exam for RN- BSN students and 80% satisfaction on EOP survey for Practice. 90% of master s students will successfully complete comps or Capstone experience and 80% or greater will indicate EOP satisfaction for Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Method for Assessment NCLEX-RN for generic BSN first time passage rates and NLN Achievement Exam Percentile for RN-BSN Students and Likert Scale rating for Practice on EOP survey. Percentage of students passing comps or capstone experience and percentage on EOP survey indicating satisfaction on for Nursing Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 212

219 Criterion Number Criterion Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Expected Level of Achievement Nursing Timeframe for Evaluation Method for Assessment Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement Inquiry Associate Dean for Graduate Programs 90% of master s students will successfully complete project, thesis or capstone project and 80% will indicate EOP satisfaction for Inquiry Annually Percentage of students completing project, thesis or capstone project and percentage on EOP survey indicating satisfaction for Inquiry 213

220 Criterion Number Criterion Practice Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement Anesthesia and A/GNP students will perform at or above the national mean on certification exams and Admin and Ed students will successfully complete the final practicum experiences in NUR643 and NUR653 and 80% or above students will indicate satisfaction on EOP survey for Practice Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Method for Assessment Certification Exam passage rates for first time takers and percentage of satisfaction on EOP survey for Practice Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement DNP Nursing (Measurement to begin in ) Inquiry 214

221 Criterion Number Criterion Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Expected Level of Achievement Timeframe for Evaluation Method for Assessment Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement Practice PhD Nursing Inquiry Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs 90% or above on preliminary exams and 80% or above on EOP survey for Nursing 90% or above success on proposal defense and final defense and 80% or above on EOP survey for Inquiry Annually Annually Percentage of students who are successful on prelims and percentage of satisfaction EOP survey for Nursing Percentage of students who are successful on proposal and final defense and percentage of satisfaction on EOP survey for Inquiry 215

222 Criterion Number Criterion Practice Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement 90% will successfully complete NUR742 internship experience and 80% or above on EOP survey for Practice Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Method for Assessment Percentage of students who are successful in completing internship experience and percentage of satisfaction on EOP survey for Practice Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 36. The curriculum is developed by the faculty and regularly reviewed to ensure integrity, rigor, and currency. 37. The curriculum includes general education courses that enhance professional nursing knowledge and practice Faculty and Curriculum Committee Faculty and Curriculum Committee Curriculum is developed by the faculty and reviewed every 4 years by the Curriculum Committee Graduates have a general education background, are information literate, and practice from Continuously and on a 4- year cycle for review Annually and every four years Syllabi, student evaluations, end of program evaluations, faculty evaluation of courses, and examples of student work are critiqued for further development of curriculum Reviews of curriculum by Curriculum Committee and responses on end of program and alumni 216

223 Criterion Number Criterion (Baccalaureate). The curriculum is designed to prepare graduates to be information literate and to practice from an evidence-based approach (Baccalaureate). Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Expected Level of Achievement an evidencebased approach Timeframe for Evaluation Method for Assessment surveys Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement The curriculum is designed to prepare graduates to be information literate and to practice from an evidence-based approach in their direct and indirect advanced nursing roles (Master s). The curriculum is designed to prepare graduates to practice from an evidencebased perspective in their role through effective use and collaborative production of clinically-based scholarship (Clinical 217

224 Criterion Number Criterion Doctorate). 38. The curriculum includes cultural, ethnic, and socially diverse concepts and may also include experiences from regional, national, or global perspectives (Baccalaureate). The curriculum is designed so that graduates of the program are able to practice in a culturally and ethnically diverse global society (Master s and Clinical Doctorate). 39. The curriculum and instructional processes reflect educational theory, inter-professional collaboration, research, and current standards of practice. 40. Evaluation methodologies are Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Faculty and Curriculum Committee Curriculum Committee and Faculty Curriculum Committee and Expected Level of Achievement Curriculum includes cultural and global concepts and experiences Curriculum and instructional practices reflect best practices Evaluation methodologies Timeframe for Evaluation Annually and every four years Every four years by Curriculum Committee and annually by a faculty peer evaluator Every 4 years by Method for Assessment Responses by students and graduates on end of program and alumni surveys and reviews by Curriculum Committee every 4 years for each program Curriculum committee minutes and reports of peer reviews of teaching on faculty annual reports. Course syllabi and examples Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 218

225 Criterion Number Criterion varied, reflect established professional and practice competencies, and measure the achievement of the student learning outcomes. 41. The length of time and the credit hours required for program completion are congruent with the attainment of identified student learning outcomes and program outcomes and consistent with the policies of the governing organization, state and national standards, and best practices (Baccalaureate). Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Faculty Associate Deans, Faculty, and Curriculum Committee Expected Level of Achievement are varied and measure student learning and program outcomes Program length is congruent with policies and standards for each level Timeframe for Evaluation Curriculum Committee Annually Method for Assessment of student work are reviewed by the Curriculum Committee Program length and completion by students is assessed by Associate Deans and reported to Curriculum Committee and other Councils; policies and standards are addressed for each level. Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement Program length is congruent with the attainment of identified student 219

226 Criterion Number Criterion learning outcomes and program outcomes and consistent with the policies of the governing organization, state and national standards, and best practices (Master s and Clinical Doctorate). 42. Practice learning environments support the achievement of student learning outcomes and program outcomes. 43. Students participate in clinical experiences that are evidence-based and reflect contemporary practice and nationally established patient health and safety goals. 44. Written agreements for clinical practice agencies are current, Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Faculty and Curriculum Committee Dept. Heads, Faculty, and Curriculum Committee Dean and Assistant Expected Level of Achievement Practice environments are appropriate to support learning outcomes Evidencebased clinical experiences Clinical contracts are current with Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Biannually and every 4 years Annually Method for Assessment Faculty assess effectiveness of the site each semester Assessed by Dept Heads and Faculty each semester and by Curriculum Committee for program and course reviews every 4 years Assessed annually by dean, Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 220

227 Criterion Number Criterion specify expectations for all parties, and ensure the protection of students. 45. Learning activities, instructional materials, and evaluation methods are appropriate for all delivery formats and consistent with the student learning outcomes. 46. Fiscal resources are sustainable, sufficient to ensure the achievement of the student learning outcomes and program outcomes, and commensurate with the resources of the governing organization. 47. Physical resources are sufficient to ensure the achievement of the nursing education unit outcomes, and meet the needs of the faculty, staff, and Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Faculty and Curriculum Committee Dean and Faculty Dean, Faculty, and Learning Resources Committee Expected Level of Achievement appropriate expectations for all parties All pedagogy is appropriate to support face to face or online instruction Resources are adequate to support program through state budget, grant income, and endowments Physical resources are adequate to support all programs Timeframe for Evaluation Annually and every 4 years Annually Evaluated annually by dean, faculty, staff, and students Method for Assessment affiliating party, and attorneys as appropriate Annual peer evaluation of teaching and 4 year review by Curriculum Committee Reviewed with the Administrative Council and Faculty at meetings. Information recorded in SON Annual report. Physical resources are evaluated by the dean s office and other resources are evaluated by the Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 221

228 Criterion Number Criterion students. 48. Learning resources and technology are selected with faculty input and are comprehensive, current, and accessible to faculty and students. 49. Fiscal, physical, technological, and learning resources are sufficient to meet the needs of the faculty and students engaged in alternative methods of delivery. Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, Faculty, ITC, DCL, TLC, and Library Dean, Associate Deans, Outreach Director, Curriculum Committee and Faculty Expected Level of Achievement Current and accessible learning resources and technology Sufficient resources for outreach and online programs Timeframe for Evaluation Continuously and annually Continuously and annually Method for Assessment Learning Resources Committee; students evaluate resources on course and program evaluations Computers are updated on a three year cycle; LRC receives requests for new learning resources annually; students evaluate resources on program evaluations Budget, technology resources, library, and other services are evaluated before the program begins; student Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 222

229 Criterion Number Criterion 50. The systematic plan for evaluation of the nursing education unit emphasizes the ongoing assessment and evaluation of student learning outcomes; program outcomes; rolespecific graduate/professiona l competencies; and the ACEN Standards. 51. The systematic plan of evaluation contains specific, measurable expected levels of achievement; appropriate assessment methods; and a minimum of three years of data for each component Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs and Evaluation Committee Associate Dean for Graduate Programs and Evaluation Committee Expected Level of Achievement Program assessment is ongoing; demonstrates student learning and program outcomes; and professional standards Appropriate assessment methods and three years of data Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Method for Assessment evaluations of courses each semester; and program review by the Curriculum Committee Evaluation Plan and documentation of outcomes reviewed annually by the Evaluation Committee Reviewed annually by the Associate Dean for Graduate Programs and the Evaluation Committee Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 223

230 Criterion Number Criterion within the plan. 52. Evaluation findings are aggregated and trended by program option, location, and date of completion and are sufficient to inform program decision-making for the maintenance and improvement of the student learning outcomes and the program outcomes. 53. Aggregate faculty outcomes are consistent with and contribute to achievement of the program s mission, goals, and expected student outcomes. Teaching Scholarship Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs, Graduate Program Assistant, Evaluation Committee, and Faculty Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Expected Level of Achievement Evaluation findings are aggregated and trended for each option and site; data inform decisionmaking The School of Nursing will remain an NLN Center of Excellence in Nursing Education Faculty will develop at least 100 Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Annually Method for Assessment Data is collected by Associate Deans and Graduate Program Assistant; Councils and CC receive data and make decisions based on data Analysis of Center of Excellence activities. Number of faculty manuscripts Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 224

231 Criterion Number Criterion Service 54. Evaluation findings are shared with communities of interest. 55. The program demonstrates evidence of achievement in meeting the program outcomes: Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement manuscripts per year and will have at least $750,000 in external funding. Each faculty member will serve on at least one committee at the School, University, or community level. Evaluation findings are shared with communities of interest to demonstrate appropriate competencies of graduates Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Method for Assessment developed and annual external funding amount Assessment of committee memberships for each faculty member Findings are shared on the website, in annual reports, and with advisory groups Baccalaureate: Performance on Associate At or above the Annually at Analysis of Aggregate Results for This Year All outcome data below are found in the SON Annual Report Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 225

232 Criterion Number Criterion licensure exam: The program s 3-year mean for the licensure exam pass rate will be at or above the national mean for the same 3- year period. Program completion: Expected levels of achievement for program completion are determined by the faculty and reflect student demographics and program options. Graduate program satisfaction: Qualitative and quantitative measures address Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Dean for Undergraduate Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement national mean for 3 years and 90% or above for UNC General Administration expectations for first-time takers 80% of prelicensure students graduate from program within 3 years of the admission to the upper division major; 70% graduate within 4 years and 80% graduate within 6 years. 80% of RN- BSN students graduate within 7 years 80% or higher express program satisfaction Timeframe for Evaluation end of calendar year Annually Annually Method for Assessment results reported on NCBON website Assessment of completion rates for students enrolled in the BSN and RN- BSN programs End of program and alumni surveys Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 226

233 Criterion Number Criterion graduates six to twelve months postgraduation. Employer program satisfaction: Qualitative and quantitative measures address employer satisfaction with graduate preparation for entry-level positions six to twelve months postgraduation. Job placement rates: Expected levels of achievement are determined by the faculty and are addressed through quantified measures six to twelve months post-graduation. Master s: Performance on certifications exams that is at or above the national mean for first-time candidates Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement 80% of employers express program satisfaction 80% of graduates are employed in nursing positions Certification rates that are at or above the national mean for first-time candidates Timeframe for Evaluation At least biennially Annually Annually Method for Assessment Assessment of Focus Group(s) level of satisfaction, areas of strength and areas for improvement Return of postcard by graduates indicating job placement Assessment of CRNA and A- GNP or Adult certification rates from national certifying Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 227

234 Criterion Number Criterion Program completion: Expected levels of achievement for program completion are determined by the faculty and reflect student demographics and program options. Graduate program satisfaction: Qualitative and quantitative measures address graduates six to twelve months postgraduation. Employer program satisfaction: Qualitative and quantitative measures address employer satisfaction with graduate preparation for entry-level positions six to twelve months postgraduation. Job placement rates: Expected levels of Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs Associate Deans Expected Level of Achievement 80% will graduate within 5 years 80% of graduates will express program satisfaction 80% of employers will express satisfaction with the graduates At least 80% of graduates Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually At least biennially at Focus Group(s) Annually Method for Assessment agencies Assessment of 5-year graduation rates End of Program and Alumni Surveys Assessment of level of satisfaction, areas of strength, and areas for improvement Return of postcards with Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 228

235 Criterion Number Criterion achievement are determined by the faculty and are addressed through quantified measures six to twelve months post-graduation. Clinical Doctorate Performance on certification exams Program completion Graduate program satisfaction Employer program satisfaction Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement will be employed in nursing positions Graduates will perform at the national mean or above on the certification exam At least 80% will graduate within 7 years At least 80% of graduates will express program satisfaction At least 80% of employers will express satisfaction with the graduates Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Annually At least biennially Method for Assessment employment information, assessment of NCBON website for NPs, and personal contacts Analysis of reports from national certifying agencies Assessment of 7-year graduation rates End of Program and Alumni Surveys Assessment of Focus Group(s) satisfaction with graduates, strengths, and areas for improvement Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 229

236 Criterion Number Criterion Professional job placement/role related positions Research Doctorate Program completion Graduate program satisfaction Employer program satisfaction Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Associate Deans Director of PhD Program Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs Expected Level of Achievement At least 80% of graduates will be employed in nursing positions At least 80% will graduate within 7 years At least 80% will be satisfied with PhD program At least 80% will express satisfaction with graduates Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Annually Annually At least biennially Method for Assessment Return of postcard with employment information, NCBON website for NPs, and personal contacts Assessment of 7-year graduation rates End of Program and Alumni Surveys Assessment of Focus Group(s) satisfaction with program, strengths, and areas for improvement Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement 230

237 Criterion Number Criterion Professional job placement Person(s) Responsible to Collect Data Director of PhD Program Expected Level of Achievement At least 80% will be employed in a nursing position Timeframe for Evaluation Annually Method for Assessment Return of postcards with employment information and personal contacts Aggregate Results for This Year Analysis and Strategies for Maintenance or Improvement Procedures for Use: 1. Faculty who are responsible for collecting data will be oriented to the process by the Evaluation Committee. 2. Evaluation Committee members will enter aggregate data results each Fall for the preceding year. 3. Evaluation Committee members will provide a short summative analysis of the results and strategy for maintenance or improvement each fall based on findings in minutes or reports. 4. Evaluation Committee members also will indicate the source of results from minutes and/or reports and the date. EK 5/03; 2005; KC 4/06; KC 4/07; ER 4/08; DH 5/18/09; DH 3/4/10; JK 4/28/11, JK 4/23/12; LL 7/13 231

238 FALL SPRING Administration Concentration Courses 641, 642, 643 MSN/MBA Courses MSN Support Courses 540, 541, 614 Post-Baccalaureate Certificate in Administration Nursing Case Management Certificate Undergraduate Support Courses PHI 121, 220 STA 108 CHE 104 & 110L NTR 213 HDF 211 BIO 271,277,280 PSY 121 SOC 101, 202 ATY 100 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING CURRICULUM COMMITTEE Schedule of Systematic Curriculum Evaluation Generic BSN Courses Electives RN-BSN Courses Electives 330, 345, 390, 442, 460, 492, 496, 505, 561, 580, Anesthesia Concentration Courses , 672, 675 Post-Masters Certificate Anesthesia Adult/Gerontological Nurse Practitioner Courses Post-Masters Certificate A/GNP Post-Baccalaureate Certificate Gerontology MSN Education Concentration Courses 551, 615, 616, 651, 652, 653 Post-Baccalaureate Certificate Education MSN Support Course Mission and Philosophy Congruence Conceptual Frameworkcongruence with course objectives and learning activities. Instruments Terminal Objectives Length of Program PhD Courses , , , MSN Core Courses Courses to be evaluated every 4 years August 12, 2002 LM/jdw;5/04; 03/06; 05/06; 03/09, 11/10; 4/11; 12/11; 7/12; 1/13 Procedures for Use: 1. The chair of the curriculum committee will notify faculty when course materials are needed by the committee for curriculum evaluation. When possible, faculty members will have advance notice of at least two months, in order to allow faculty time to prepare their documents for review. 2. Faculty will be provided instructions for gathering their documents, including the review checklist used by the curriculum committee members to evaluate their course(s). 3. Faculty who fail to submit requested materials by the given deadline will be notified again in writing to provide the materials. The facultymember s department chair will also be included on this notification. 4. If substantial recommendations are made by the curriculum committee for changes to the course, a revised syllabus will be requested. 5. The chair of the committee will be responsible for updating the current listings of approved course descriptions and student learning outcomes in the Curriculum Notebook in the secretary s suite.

239 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro SCHOOL OF NURSING Curriculum Committee Evaluation Checklist for Undergraduate Courses Course: Date of Evaluation: Evaluators: Criterion Yes No NA* Comments 1. Course outcomes, description, and prerequisites remain the same as in bulletin and as those last approved by the curriculum committee. If new outcomes, they must support the appropriate level outcomes of the School of Nursing. 2. Concepts of person, health, environment, nursing, caring, inquiry, and practice evident in course. 3. Concepts of information literacy and evidence-based practice evident in course. 4. Concepts that prepare students to practice in a culturally, ethnically and socially diverse global society are evident in course. 5. Unit/class outcomes are appropriately leveled to guide learning. 6. Required texts are appropriate for content area and level of student. 7. Teaching strategies are appropriate for content area and level of student. 8. Evaluation methods are appropriate for measuring achievement of student learning outcomes. 9. Policies are included in syllabus: Attendance, aca, Dress Code (if applicable) and Drop Policy (1/2 semester courses only). 10. Faculty evaluations of the course have been used in ongoing course development. 11. Student evaluations of the course (and end-of-program evaluations, as appropriate) have been used in ongoing course development. 12. Faculty evaluations of clinical agencies have been used in ongoing course development (clinical courses only). 13. Examples of student work give evidence of achievement of course objectives. 14. Describe how the course meets identified professional standards or competencies. 15. Describe how current trends and issues in this field are incorporated in this course. 16. Course SLO s, teaching and evaluation methodologies are appropriate to course delivery via distance. 17. Revised syllabus requested for review Recommendations/Summary: *If N/A checked, please explain why rev. 03/09; 04/11, 1/13 233

240 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro SCHOOL OF NURSING Curriculum Committee Evaluation Checklist for Undergraduate Non-Nursing Courses Course: Date of Evaluation: Evaluators: Criterion Yes No NA* Comments 1. Course outcomes, description, and prerequisites remain the same as in bulletin and as those last approved by the curriculum committee. 2. Unit/class outcomes are appropriately leveled to guide learning. 3. Topical outline reflects course description and student learning outcomes. 4. Required texts are appropriate for content area and level of student. 5. Teaching strategies are appropriate for content area and level of student. 6. Evaluation methods are appropriate for measuring achievement of student learning outcomes. 7. Policies are included in syllabus: Attendance, Academic Integrity Policy. 8. Faculty evaluations of the course have been used in ongoing course development. 9. Student evaluations of the course have been used in ongoing course development. 10. Examples of student work give evidence of achievement of course objectives. 11. Describe how current trends and issues in this field are incorporated in this course. 12. This course provides important information for pre-licensure nursing students. Recommendations/Summary: *If N/A check, please explain why 234

241 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro SCHOOL OF NURSING Curriculum Committee Evaluation Checklist for Graduate Courses Course: Date of Evaluation: Evaluators: Criterion Yes No NA* Comments 1. Course outcomes, description, and prerequisites remain the same as in bulletin and as those last approved by the curriculum committee. If new outcomes, they must support the appropriate level outcomes of the School of Nursing. 2. Concepts of person, health, environment, nursing, caring, inquiry, and practice evident in course. 3. Concepts of information literacy and evidence-based practice evident in course. 4. Concepts that prepare students to practice in a culturally, ethnically and socially diverse global society are evident in course. 5. Content outlines support the course outcomes. 6. Readings and references are current and appropriate for content area and level of student. 7. Teaching strategies are appropriate for delivery of content and level of student. 8. Evaluation methods are appropriate for measuring achievement of student learning outcomes. 9. Policies are included in syllabus: Attendance, Academic Integrity Policy, Dress Code (if applicable) and Drop Policy (1/2 semester courses only). 10. Faculty evaluations of the course have been used in ongoing course development. 11. Student evaluations (and end-ofprogram evaluations, as appropriate) of the course have been used in ongoing course development. 12. Faculty evaluations of clinical agencies have been used in ongoing course development (clinical courses only). 13. Examples of student work give evidence of achievement of course objectives. 14. Course SLOs, teaching and evaluation methodologies are appropriate to course delivery via distance. 15. Revised syllabus requested for review Recommendations/Summary: *If N/A checked, please explain why rev. 03/09; 04/11; 1/13 235

242 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro SCHOOL OF NURSING Curriculum Committee Evaluation Checklist for Graduate Concentrations Course: Date of Evaluation: Campus-based (yes/no) Outreach (y/n) Online (y/n) Evaluators: Criterion Yes No NA* Comments 1. Concentration is logically organized. 2. Concentration provides for attainment of advanced knowledge applied to specialized area of nursing. 4. Concentration provides for application of nursing theory to practice area. 5. Concentration includes leadership, management, and teaching skills in the particular role emphasis. 6. Validation and extension of research findings in the particular practice area are included. 7. Concentration courses provide for acquisition of knowledge and skills in scientific inquiry. 8. Opportunity exists for role development in an area of advanced nursing practice through appropriate learning experiences. 9. Describe how the concentration/program meets identified professional standards or competencies. Recommendations/Summary: *If N/A checked, please explain why. Rev. 03/09; 4/11 236

243 Academic Procedures, 186 Administration Administrative Advisory Council, 38 Administrative Assistant to the Dean, 38 Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study, 38 Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study, 38 Associate Dean for Research, 38 Dean, 38 Agency-School Instructional Agreements and Letters of Agreement, 76 Authorship and Ownership Agreement Form, 147 Guidelines, 144 INDEX Teaching Excellence Award Committee, 63 Committees (Bylaws) Ad Hoc Committees, 37 Distribution of Minutes, 36 Election to Committees, 37 Functions, 33 Functions of Chairman, 35 Functions of Recorder, 35 Meeting, 36 Meetings & Procedures, 34 Membership, 33 Purpose, 33 Quorum, 36 Standing Committees, 36 Standing Committee Descriptions, 36 Statement of Responsibility, 33 Bylaws Committees: Article 1, 33 Administration: Article 2, 38 Nominations and Elections: Article 3, 40 Amendments: Article 4, 43 Appendix to Bylaws, 44 Class Attendance Notice, 65 Clinical Appointment and Reappointment Procedures for Clinical Track, 182 Clinical Assistant Professor Criteria, 176 Clinical Associate Professor Criteria, 178 Clinical Evaluation Guide, 84 Clinical Instructor Criteria, 174 Clinical Professor Criteria, 180 Clinical Track Criteria for Appointment or Reappointment, 173 Clinical Track Document - Preface, 173 Proced, Eval. Students in Course w/ Clinical Component Procedure, 83 Committees BSN Council, 45 Bylaws & Elections Committee, 46 Curriculum Committee, 47 Equity, Diversity & Inclusion Committee, 49 Evaluation Committee, 50 Learning Resources Committee, 51 MSN Council, 53 PhD Council, 54 Promotion, Tenure, Reappointment & Post-tenure Review Comm., 55 Research & Scholarship Comm., 57 Scholarship Committee, 59 Student Admission, Progression and Appeals Committee, 60 Student Recruitment & Orientation Committee, Conceptual Framework, 5 Caring, 6 Content Components, 5 Environment, 5 Health, 5 Inquiry, 5 Nursing, 5 Organization of, using Content Concepts, 7 Person, 5 Practice, 6 Process Components, 6 Student Learning Outcomes, 8 Curriculum Systematic Program Evaluation, 193 Data Safety Monitoring for Human Subjects Research Checklist, 143 Guidelines, 141 Disaster Plans, 97 Evaluations Administrative Evaluation of Faculty - Procedure, 102 Annual Faculty Evaluation by Department Chair Form, 105 Annual Faculty Review Form, 103 Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Study, 108 Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study, 110 Associate Dean for Research Evaluation, 111

244 Checklist for Graduate Courses, 234 Checklist for Graduate Concentrations, 235 Checklist for Undergraduate Courses, 232 Checklist for Undergrad. Non-Nursing Courses, 233 Dean, 106 Director of Doctoral Program, 112 Department Chair Evaluation, 115 Statistician/Biostatistician Evaluation, 114 Faculty Evaluation of Clinical Sites Used for Student Learning - Procedure, 116 Faculty Feedback onclinical Site (FFCS) Form, 117 Faculty Feedback on Preceptor Effectiveness (FFPE), 119 Peer/Administrative Evaluation of Teaching - Procedure, 98 Peer/Administrative Evaluation of Teaching - Form, 99 Preceptor s Feedback on Student Performance (PFSP), 120 Procedure for Obtaining Feedback in Clinical Course Using Preceptors, 118 Schedule of Systematic Curriculum Evaluations, 231 Student Evaluation of Course Form, 122 Student Evaluation of Faculty and Courses, 121 Student Evaluation of Faculty in Classroom Form, 125 Student Evaluation of Faculty in Clinical Form, 124 Student Evaluation of Faculty in Clinical Course with Preceptor Form, 123 Faculty-Agency Liaison Guidelines, 79 Faculty Appointments in the SON, 133 Faculty Responsibilities, 126 Academic Advising, 126 Faculty Schedules, 127 Faculty Travel, 128 Liability Insurance, 126 Licensure, 126 Promotion and Tenure, 126 Room Reservation, 126 Goals SON Goals, 2 BSN Goals, 2 DNP Goals, 2 MSN Goals, 2 PhD Goals, 3 Grading Grading Policy, 71 Grading Procedures, 71 Grading Scale, 71 Grading System, 71 Hazardous Wastes Procedure for Handling, 132 Immunizations Students Special Requirements, 183 Injury Report of Injury/Near Miss not Requiring Professional Medical Care, 131 Laboratory/Clinical Courses Informed Consent Agreement, 82 Mission, 1 Nominations & Elections Bylaws, 40 Elections, 41 Nominations, 41 Responsibilities of Bylaws and Elections Committees, 40 Notifying Students of Unsatisfactory Progress Procedures, 187 Organizational Chart UNCG, 13 SON, 14 Ownership and Authorship Agreement, 147 Guidelines, 144 Parenteral/Mucous Membrane in the Learning Laboratory Procedures, 130 Philosophy, 3 Policies, Academic Program Policy 65 Academic Integrity, 65 Course Attendance, 65 Permission-miss class/clin.,64 Student Records, 66 Adverse Weather & Campus Closure, 66 Class Attend-Withdraw/Cancel, 67 Student Dress Code Policy, 68 Uniform Guidelines, 68 Hygiene/Grooming/Prof. Presentation, 69 Agency Requirements,

245 Position Description Associate Dean and Director of Graduate Programs, 16 Associate Dean and Director of Undergraduate Study, 15 Associate Dean for Research, 17 Class Advisor, 28 Course Chair, 26 Department Chair, 19 Director Outreach Program, Hickory, 18 Director of Doctoral Program, 20 Director of Undergraduate Advising, 24 Hardware Technology Consultant, 23 Honors Liaison, 29 Instructional Tech. Consultant, 21 Instructional Tech. Specialist/Webmaster, 22 Lab coordinator, 30 OSHA Trainer, 31 Statistician/Biostatistician, 25 Practicum Courses Practicum Rotation, 81 Preceptors Criteria for Utilization, 86 Evaluation of Clinical Sites Procedure, 116 Evaluation of Clinical Sites Form, 117 Guidelines for Vita, 90 Preceptor s Feedback on Student Performance, 120 Procedure for Evaluating Preceptors, 118 Responsibilities in a Nurse Preceptor Relationship, 93 Responsibilities in a Resource Person Relationship, 95 Vita Form, 91 Guidelines, 134 Involving Animal Subjects, 136 Involving Human Subjects, 135 Using School of Nursing Faculty or Students as Subjects, 135 Research Confidentiality Agreement,139 Resource Person Responsibilities in Resource Person Relationship, 95 Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, 100 Standards of Practice, 9 Student Appeal Request Form, 74 Student Learning Outcomes, 8 Student Management of Exposures, 130 Student Special Requirements, 183 Syllabus, 72 Format Guidelines, 72 Teaching Excellence Award Criteria, 190 Unsafe Practice, 184 Word Processing/Copying Guidelines for Submitting to Faculty Secretaries, 189 Program Evaluation Plan, 193 Procedure for Use, 230 Promotion and Tenure Criteria & Procedures, 148 Criteria for Promotion - Assistant Professor, 152 Criteria for Promotion - Associate Professor, 153 Criteria for Promotion - Professor, 154 Evaluation Guidelines for Assistant Prof., 161 Associate Prof., 163 Professor, 166 Guidelines, Appointment, Promotion, Tenure, Reappoint. & Post-Tenure Review, 150 Post-Tenure Review Proced., 169 Promotion, Tenure, Criteria & Procedures, 148 Reappointment Form, 168 Protocol Review Checklist, 140 Research Activities By Students, 134 Grant Proposals,