MARCH 2015 REPORT. 2013p. DATA SERIES Safety performance indicators Process safety events 2013 data

Transcription

1 REPORT p MARCH 215 DATA SERIES Safety performance indicators Process safety events data

2 Disclaimer Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither IOGP nor any of its Members past, present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms. Copyright notice The contents of these pages are International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of IOGP and (ii) the sources are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other use requires the prior written permission of IOGP. These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

3 REPORT p MARCH 215 DATA SERIES Safety performance indicators Process safety events data Revision history VERSION DATE AMENDMENTS 1. March 215 First release

4 Process safety events data 4 1. Executive summary IOGP published Report 456, Process Safety Recommended Practice on Key Performance Indicators in November to provide guidance on Key Performance Indicators (KPI) to upstream companies for managing process safety hazards and risks and to prevent unplanned and uncontrolled loss of containment of materials. p, Process safety events data is a further step towards making Process Safety Event (PSE) data and associated KPIs available to all stakeholders. The PSE data presented in this report are based on voluntary submissions from participating IOGP member companies and are not representative of the entire upstream oil and gas industry. Since this is only the second PSE report published by IOGP, readers are cautioned not to attempt to identify trends at this point. IOGP started a pilot process of data collection in 21, and data were published in report p in December. Collection of data has progressed with the number of companies reporting increasing from 26 in to 32 in and 39 in. In this report, data are published together with and data. A targeted quality assurance process offering companies the opportunity to resubmit and data has resulted in refinements to the data published in IOGP report p. No further changes to historical data will be accepted. A summary of data can be found in Appendix A. The Process Safety Events (PSE) data presented are based on the numbers of and PSE reported by participating IOGP member companies, separately for: onshore and offshore drilling and production activities consequences material released. Tier 3 and Tier 4 process safety KPIs are not included in this report but they are being considered for future data requests. The and data presented have been normalized against work hours associated with drilling and production activities to provide PSE rates. Figure 1 shows the overall and PSE rates.

5 Executive summary 5.8 PSE per million work hours Figure 1: PSE Rate and In, 4 of the reported PSE resulted in 5 fatalities. In, 6 of the reported PSE resulted in 39 fatalities and in, 5 of the reported PSE resulted in 8 fatalities. The fatal incident and high potential event descriptions from the Safety performance indicators report that are process safety related or process safety events are in pfh, Fatal incident and high potential event report. This report is to feed back learnings from events and to help organizations to categorize process safety events.

6 Process safety events data 6 Contributing IOGP member companies These statistics were derived from data provided by the following companies. ADNOC ADDAX PETROLEUM LIMITED ADDAX PETROLEUM LIMITED BG GROUP ADNOC ADNOC BHP BG GROUP BASHNEFT BP BHP BG GROUP CAIRN ENERGY BP BHP CHEVRON CAIRN ENERGY BP CONOCOPHILLIPS CHEVRON CAIRN ENERGY DONG E&P CNOOC CHEVRON EXXONMOBIL CONOCOPHILLIPS CNOOC INPEX DOLPHIN ENERGY CONOCOPHILLIPS KOSMOS E.ON DOLPHIN ENERGY KUWAIT OIL COMPANY EXXONMOBIL DONG E&P MOL HESS CORPORATION E.ON NCOC (North Caspian Operating Co.) INPEX EXXONMOBIL NEXEN INC KOSMOS GALP OMV KUWAIT OIL COMPANY HESS CORPORATION PAN AMERICAN ENERGY MARATHON OIL COMPANY INPEX PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD NEXEN INC KOSMOS RASGAS OMV KUWAIT OIL COMPANY SHELL COMPANIES PAN AMERICAN ENERGY MARATHON OIL COMPANY STATOIL PEMEX MOL SUNCOR PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD NEXEN INC TOTAL PREMIER OIL OIL SEARCH WINTERSHALL PTTEP OMV WOODSIDE RASGAS PAN AMERICAN ENERGY YEMEN LNG SHELL COMPANIES PEMEX STATOIL PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD SUNCOR PREMIER OIL TOTAL PTTEP WINTERSHALL RASGAS WOODSIDE SASOL YEMEN LNG SHELL COMPANIES STATOIL SUNCOR TALISMAN ENERGY TOTAL TULLOW OIL WINTERSHALL WOODSIDE

7 7 Contents 1. Executive summary 4 Contributing IOGP member companies 6 2. Introduction 8 Data collection 11 Narrative event descriptions 11 Normalization 12 Database dimensions Overall results 15 Sabotage/wilful damage Results by work function 21 Drilling 21 Production Production results by activity 27 Production Results by consequence Injury as consequence 32 Fire or explosion as consequence Results by material released Appendix A: Data tables 37 Appendix B: Company results 47 Appendix C: Report forms (for reference only) 51

8 Process safety events data 8 2. Introduction In response to a number of Major Incidents, the oil and gas industry has identified opportunities to improve Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for monitoring and review within management systems in order to more proactively identify and address weaknesses in risk controls (barriers). IOGP published Report 456, Process Safety Recommended Practice on Key Performance Indicators in November. This IOGP report builds on the framework and definitions included in the API Recommended Practice (RP) 754, Process Safety Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries on process safety indicators, with specific emphasis on their application to upstream oil and gas activities. IOGP report number 456 and API RP 754 adopt a four-tier framework of KPIs which is illustrated in Figure 2. Tiers 1 and 2 are predominantly lagging indicators related to Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) referred to as a Process Safety Event (PSE). The KPI records events with greater consequence within the four-tier approach. The KPI records incidents with a lesser consequence. Key Definitions Process Safety Process safety is a disciplined framework for managing the integrity of operating systems and processes handling hazardous substances. It is achieved by applying good design principles, engineering, and operating and maintenance practices. It deals with the prevention and control of events that have the potential to release hazardous materials and energy. Such incidents can result in toxic effects, fires or explosions, and could ultimately result in serious incidents including fatalities, injuries, property damage, lost production or environmental damage. Major Incident An incident that has resulted in multiple fatalities and/or serious damage, possibly beyond the asset itself. Typically initiated by a hazardous release, but may also result from major structural failure or loss of stability that has caused serious damage to an asset (note this is intended to incorporate terms such as Major Accident as defined by UK HSE 1 ). 1 HMSO The control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) Regulations Statutory Instrument 1999 No See UK HSE and available from Her Majesty s Stationary Office, London, at

9 Introduction 9 Key Definitions Primary containment A tank, vessel, pipe, truck, rail, car, or other equipment designed to keep a material within it, typically for purposes of storage, separate, processing or transfer of gases or liquids. The terms vessel and pipe are taken to include containment of reservoir fluids within the casing and wellhead valving to the surface. Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) An unplanned or uncontrolled release of any material from primary containment, including non-toxic and non-flammable materials (e.g. steam, nitrogen, carbon dioxide or compressed air). Lagging indicators LOPC events of greater consequence LOPC events of lesser consequence Tier 3 Challenges to safety systems Tier 4 Leading indicators indicators Operating discipline & management system performance indicators Figure 2: Process Safety Indicator Pyramid (from API RP 754) Process Safety Event (PSE) IOGP reportable An unplanned or uncontrolled LOPC of any material including non-toxic and non-flammable materials (e.g. steam, hot condensate, nitrogen, compressed CO 2 or compressed air) from a process, or an undesired event or condition that under slightly different circumstances, could have resulted in LOPC. Secondary Containment An impermeable physical barrier specifically designed to prevent release into the environment of materials that have breached primary containment. Secondary containment systems include, but are not limited to, tank dykes, curbing around process equipment, drainage collection systems into segregated oily drain systems, the outer wall of double walled tanks, etc. API RP 754 and KPI definitions and thresholds have been adopted by IOGP with the intent that both indicators are applied across production and drilling operations for the industry worldwide. The and KPIs include LOPC incidents that are reportable as Process Safety Events (PSEs) if the incident results in any of the consequences shown in Figure 3. The definitions refer to material release threshold quantities, which are published in Appendix B of IOGP Report 456. A glossary of terms related to PSE and Process Safety Indicators can be found in s, Safety performance indicators data.

10 Process safety events data 1 Indicator Definition and Consequences A Process Safety Event (PSE) is a loss of primary containment (LOPC) with the greatest consequence as defined by this RP. A PSE is an unplanned or uncontrolled release of any material, including non-toxic and nonflammable materials (e.g., steam, hot condensate, nitrogen, compressed CO 2 or compressed air), from a process that results in one or more of the consequences listed below: An employee, contractor or subcontractor days away from work injury and/or fatality; A hospital admission and/or fatality of a thirdparty; An officially declared community evacuation or community shelter-in-place; A fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $25, of direct cost to the Company; A pressure relief device (PRD) discharge to atmosphere whether directly or via a downstream destructive device that results in one or more of the following four consequences: liquid carryover; discharge to a potentially unsafe location; an onsite shelter-in-place; public protective measures (e.g., road closure); and a PRD discharge quantity greater than the threshold quantities in Appendix B in any onehour; or A release of material greater than the threshold quantities described in Appendix B in any onehour period. Indicator Definition and Consequences A Process Safety Event (PSE) is a LOPC with lesser consequence. A PSE is an unplanned or uncontrolled release of any material, including non-toxic and non-flammable materials (e.g. steam, hot condensate, nitrogen, compressed CO 2 or compressed air), from a process that results in one or more of the consequences listed below and is not reported in : An employee, contractor or subcontractor recordable injury; A fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $2,5 of direct cost to the Company; A pressure relief device (PRD) discharge to atmosphere whether directly or via a downstream destructive device that results in one or more of the following four consequences: liquid carryover; discharge to a potentially unsafe location; an onsite shelter-in-place; public protective measures (e.g. road closure); and a PRD discharge quantity greater than the threshold quantity in Appendix B in any one-hour period; or A release of material greater than the threshold quantities described in Appendix B in any onehour period. Note: Non-toxic and non-flammable materials (e.g. steam, hot water, nitrogen, compressed CO 2 or compressed air) have no threshold quantities and are only included in this definition as a result of their potential to result in one of the other consequences. Note: Days away from work injury should be taken to be the same as the IOGP defined Lost Work Day Case (LWDC). Figure 3: Process Safety Event definitions and thresholds (from IOGP Report 456, extract from API RP 754)

11 Introduction 11 Data collection IOGP started a pilot process of data collection in 21 to determine the feasibility of data collection and define the metrics to be requested. Companies that were active participants in the IOGP Asset Integrity Task Force provided historic lagging KPI data for the years 28 and 29. This trial data was collected from the participating companies and analyzed to determine how the KPIs used in the downstream industry (as per API RP 754) could be defined for the upstream oil and gas industry. A formal Process Safety Event data collection request was issued to IOGP member companies for 21 data, based on the pilot study. Due to data quality issues, only data from onwards are published. A targeted quality assurance process offering companies the opportunity to resubmit and data has resulted in refinements to the data published in IOGP report p. No further changes to historical data will be accepted. and PSE data were collected from member companies using the PSE data submission form shown in Appendix B. The form is used to report the number of offshore and onshore and PSE for both drilling and production. The form is also used by companies to report consequences relating to their and PSE as well as additional information about the material released and the operational activities. Note that a single PSE can result in multiple consequences, so the total number of consequences reported will equal or exceed the total number of PSEs. IOGP member companies were also asked to submit data on fatalities that resulted from PSE, i.e. the number of PSE that resulted in one or more fatalities, as well as the actual number of fatalities (employees and contractors, or third parties). It is expected that data submissions will mature in both geographical and total work hour coverage with successive years of reporting from. It is hoped that Process Safety Event (PSE) reporting will emulate the extent of personal safety reporting. Narrative event descriptions Descriptions and lessons learned for events that had fatal consequences for company or contractor employees are published as IOGP reports sfir, sfir and sf, Safety performance indicators Fatal incident report. High potential events are published as shpe, shpe and sh. The narrative descriptions of fatal incidents and high potential events are submitted separately to the process safety event data published in this report, and therefore there can be no direct correlation between the data published in this report and the appendix. The fatal incident and high potential reports from the safety performance indicators report that are process safety related or process safety events are as pfh, Fatal incident and high potential event report. It gives narratives of process safety events and of process safety related events where there are significant learnings but the criteria for PSE is not met, e.g. equipment not connected to the process. The intention is to feed back learnings from events and to help organizations to categorize process safety events.

12 Process safety events data 12 Normalization and PSE have been normalized against work hours associated with process safety events using the following formula for the PSE Rate. Refer to IOGP Report 456, 3.3, for further information. Data are only included for normalized results where both work hours and process safety event data are reported for the data set and work function. PSER = 1 Total PSE Count Total Hours Worked (for drilling and production activities) Database dimensions The PSE data collected by IOGP are based on the numbers of and PSE reported by companies, separately for drilling and production activities and subdivided into offshore and onshore data. PSE relating to sabotage or willful damage are reported separately and are presented in section 3 of this report. They are not included in the results presented in sections 1 7. The entire IOGP safety performance database, which is used to produce the annual safety performance indicators report (IOGP reports s, s and s), contains work hours which are split into offshore and onshore work hours and five function categories (defined in the glossary of terms in s, Safety performance indicators data as work functions): exploration drilling production construction unspecified. For the purposes of the process safety event database, the only applicable functional categories from the entire IOGP safety performance database are drilling and production, onshore and offshore. The work hours associated with PSEs reported in, and for drilling and production, onshore and offshore, are shown in Table 2.

13 Introduction 13 Year Drilling work hours ( s) Production work hours ( s) Total work hours in PSE reporting database ( s) 181, , ,6 24,53 581, , ,936 63,71 883,7 87, ,12 34,665 13,67 292,76 422, ,81 288,51 449,582 Total 269,449 71, , ,11 873,844 1,28, ,17 918,572 1,332,589 Table 1: Related work hours Work hours related to datasets where either or PSE were reported. The work hours associated with the PSE data reported have been calculated as a subset of the drilling and production function work hours from the entire safety performance database (see IOGP report s, Safety performance indicators data) which have been reported for, and by participating companies. Work hours have been included where the company has reported associated or Tier 2 PSE data for the country and onshore/offshore location (data set). The associated work hours differ between and because not all companies reported both and PSE data and not all companies reported PSE data for all their global operations. The work hours from drilling and production function categories from the entire safety performance database have been used as a reference to provide an indication of scope for the PSE data presented throughout this report. Some companies that reported PSE data in, and do not split work hours by work function. The work hours associated with these companies have therefore not been included in the number of PSE work hours or the normalized data presented in this report.

14 Process safety events data 14 Data sets reported Year PSE data Overall PSE Overall by Consequence by Material by Activity PSE Overall by Consequence by Material by Activity PSE data set: A set of data with distinct company, country and location (onshore/offshore) where PSE data have been entered (i.e. not blank). Table 2: Data sets

15 Overall results Overall results Number of PSE Million hours Figure 4: Number of PSE and The total number of and process safety events reported for, and and the normalized rates are shown in Figure 4, Figure 6 and Table 3. The data include onshore and offshore activities related to production and drilling operations. The number of companies submitting PSE data continues to improve (see Table 4). 39 companies contributed PSE data in (vs. 32 in and 26 in ). This is in comparison to 45 companies contributing to the safety performance indicators database in (49 in and 5 in ). Figure 5: Number of related production and drilling work hours The data presented in Figure 6 have been normalized using the company-reported work hours associated with drilling and production operations. Where companies have not provided work hours for the drilling and production functions specifically, their reported PSEs and overall work hours have been excluded from the normalized analysis.

16 Process safety events data 16.8 PSE per million work hours Figure 6: PSE Rate and In, reported PSE represented approximately 7% of the drilling and production work hours in the entire IOGP safety database (i.e. out of 1,893 million hours). In, reported PSE represented approximately 52% of the drilling and production work hours in the entire IOGP safety database (i.e. out of 1,851 million hours). In, reported PSE represented approximately 63% of the drilling and production work hours in the IOGP safety database (i.e. out of 1,893 million hours).

17 Overall results 17 Year Number of PSE Number of PSE normalized* PSE Rate *Excludes PSE where no related drilling or production work hours were reported. For related work hours for normalized results see Table 4 (Scope overall results). Table 3: Number of reported PSE Companies reporting PSE data Related work hours (millions) Year Overall Data sets reported PSE data set: A set of data with distinct company, country and location (onshore/ offshore) where PSE data have been entered (i.e. not blank). Table 4: Scope overall results

18 Process safety events data 18 Sabotage/wilful damage Process safety events as a result of sabotage or wilful damage were reported for, and, but were not included in the PSE totals or normalized rates since they are a specific subset of PSE with unique barriers and controls. All of the reported PSE related to sabotage or wilful damage occurred onshore and were associated with production operations. Nine of the reported PSEs and 3 of the reported PSEs in resulted in fire/explosion (9 in, in ). None of the sabotage/wilful damage PSE reported to date involved fatalities. Number of PSE related to sabotage or wilful damage Year Table 5: Sabotage/wilful damage number of reported PSE Overall results onshore and offshore The and data presented below represent production and drilling PSEs and associated work hours.

19 Overall results Number of PSE Figure 7: Total number of PSE and and offshore Million hours Figure 8: Number of related production and drilling work hours and offshore

20 Process safety events data 2.8 PSE per million work hours Figure 9: PSE Rate and and offshore

21 Results by function Results by work function and data presented represent both onshore and offshore combined. Drilling Number of PSE Million hours Figure 1: Total number of PSE and Drilling Figure 11: Number of related drilling work hours.5 PSE per million work hours Figure 12: PSE Rate and Drilling

22 Process safety events data Number of PSE Figure 13: Total number of PSE and Drilling and 5 4 Million hours Figure 14: Number of related drilling work hours and offshore

23 Results by function PSE per million work hours Figure 15: PSE Rate and Drilling and offshore process safety events relating to drilling activities represent 41 million work hours, 71% of all drilling hours in the main IOGP safety database (58 million hours). process safety events relating to drilling activities represent 4 million work hours, 69% of all drilling hours in the main IOGP safety database.

24 Process safety events data 24 Production Number of PSE Million hours Figure 16: Total number of PSE and Production Figure 17: Number of related production work hours 1..9 PSE per million work hours Figure 18: PSE Rate and Production

25 Results by function Number of PSE Figure 19: Total number of PSE and Production and offshore 1 8 Million hours Figure 2: Number of related production work hours and offshore

26 Process safety events data PSE per million work hours Figure 21: PSE Rate and Production and offshore process safety events relating to production activities represent 916 million work hours. This is 7% of all production hours in the IOGP safety database (1,313 million hours). process safety events relating to production activities represent 911 million work hours, 69% of all production hours in the IOGP safety database.

27 Production results by activity Production results by activity The and data presented in this section represent both onshore and offshore and are broken down by activity, i.e. whether the event occurred during normal operations, startup or shutdown. Drilling results are not split by activity, since this would not be meaningful. Other is the category used to specify where the event could not be classified under any of the other headings (start-up, normal operations or shutdown). Unspecified is used for PSE where the activity has not been provided. Production In, 1 of the companies that reported more than one production PSE provided a breakdown by activity for PSE. In, 18 of the companies that reported more than one production PSE provided a breakdown by activity for PSE. In, 21 of the companies that reported more than one production PSE provided a breakdown by activity for PSE. 1 23% 23% 32% PSE by activity (%) % 2% 4% 2% 4% 1% 4% 69% 7% 61% 1% 2% Unspecified Other Shut down Start up Normal operations Figure 22: Production PSE by activity

28 Process safety events data 28 Production In, 1 of the companies that reported more than one production PSE provided a breakdown by activity for PSE. In, 18 of the companies that reported more than one production PSE provided a breakdown by activity for PSE. In, 19 of the companies that reported more than one production PSE provided a breakdown by activity for PSE. 1 18% 24% 35% PSE by activity (%) % 3% 3% 3% 1% 2% 4% 73% 7% 59% 1% 1% Unspecified Other Shut down Start up Normal operations Figure 23: Production PSE by activity

29 Results by consequence Results by consequence The and data presented represent both onshore and offshore, and production and drilling, combined. More than one consequence can be associated with each reported process safety event. The consequence classifications are listed in Table 6, from IOGP Report 456, Process safety Recommended Practice on Key Performance Indicators. Refer to IOGP Report 456 for further information and threshold tables. The analysis in this section shows the number of consequences assigned for the process safety events by consequence. A single PSE can result in multiple consequences, so the total number of consequences reported will equal or exceed the total number of PSEs. Information was provided on the consequence of individual events for 98% of PSE reported in and for 1% of PSE reported for and. 1 1% PSE by consequence (%) % 9% 5% 2% 1% 66% 75% 12% 8% 12% 1% 9% 9% 5% 2% 3rd Party Hosp/ Fatality Material Release PRD Discharges Fire Or Explosion Community Evacuation Fatality or LWDC Figure 24: Consequence assigned to PSE

30 Process safety events data 3 Threshholds for LOPC PSE Level (Table B 1): Actual harm or damage Injury to Employee or Contractor Fatality and/or Lost Workday Case ( days away from work or LTI) Recordable occupational injury (restricted work case or medical treatment case) Injury to Third Party Fatality, or injury/illness that results in a hospital admission None Impact to the Community Officially declared community evacuation or community shelter-in-place None Fire or Explosion Fire or Explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $25, of direct cost to the Company Fire or Explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $2,5 of direct cost to the Company (Table B 2): Material release An LOPC release of a gas or liquid exceeds the material release threshold quantities in any one hour period See Tables B 4, 5 or 6 (IOGP Report 456) for threshold quantities See Tables B 4, 5 or 6 (IOGP Report 456) for threshold quantities (Table B 3): PRD discharges A pressure relief device (PRD) discharges either directly to atmosphere or to a destructive device (e.g. flare, scrubber) Event results in a PSE if the consequence is listed in Table B 1, regardless of the quantity released, or Event results in a: liquid carryover, or discharge to a potentially hazardous location, or on-site shelter in place, or public protective measures, Event results in a PSE if the consequence is listed in Table B 1, regardless of the quantity released, or Event results in a: liquid carryover, or discharge to a potentially hazardous location, or on-site shelter in place, or public protective measures, and quantity discharged equals or exceeds any threshold in Tables B 4, 5 or 6 (IOGP Report 456) and quantity discharged equals or exceeds any threshold in Tables B 4, 5 or 6 (IOGP Report 456) B 1: LOPC or PRD discharge is recordable as a PSE when it results in one or more of the consequences in this table (irrespective of the amount of material released) B 2: LOPC is recordable as a PSE, even when no serious harm or damage results, if the amount of material released exceeds specified thresholds B 3: A PRD discharge event is recordable as a PSE if it results in serious harm or damage, or exceeds the material release threshold quantities while resulting in any of four listed criteria Table 6: Consequence classifications (Reference IOGP Report 456)

31 Results by consequence 31 Information was provided on the consequence of individual events for 96% of PSE reported in and for nearly 1% of PSE reported for and. 1 PSE by consequence (%) % 85% 9% 2% 7% 4% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 8% 2% Material Release PRD Discharges Fire or Explosion Recordable Injury Figure 25: Consequences assigned to PSE

32 Process safety events data 32 Injury as consequence The five fatal incidents resulted in 8 workforce fatalities. The four fatal incidents resulted in 5 workforce fatalities. The six fatal incidents resulted in 39 workforce fatalities. One incident resulted in 31 fatalities Events resulting in Fatality or LWDC Number of PSE Events resulting in 3rd Party Hosp/ Fatality Events resulting in Fatality Figure 26: Number of PSE with injury as consequence PSE per 1 million work hours Events resulting in Fatality or LWDC Events resulting in 3rd Party Hosp/ Fatality Events resulting in Fatality Figure 27: PSE Rate for PSE with injury as consequence

33 Results by consequence 33 Number of fatalities Employee/ Contractor fatalities 3rd Party fatalities Fatalities per 1 million work hours Employee/ Contractor fatality rate 3rd Party fatality rate Figure 28: Number of fatalities Figure 29: Fatality Rate Fatalities and related work hours only included where there were > PSE and information on the consequences of those PSE was reported. injury An employee, contractor or subcontractor Lost Work Day Case and/or fatality; A hospital admission and/or fatality of a third-party.

34 Process safety events data 34 Fire or explosion as consequence See Appendix A for information on scope. Number of PSE PSE per 1 million work hours Figure 3: Number of PSE with fire or explosion as consequence Figure 31: PSE Rate with fire or explosion as consequence PSE and related work hours only included where there were > PSE and information on the consequences of those PSE was reported. fire A fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $25, of direct cost to the Company. fire A fire or explosion resulting in greater than or equal to $2,5 of direct cost to the Company.

35 Results by material released Results by material released The and data presented represent both onshore and offshore, and production and drilling, combined. For information on scope see Appendix A. Unspecified is used for PSE where the type of material released has not been provided. In, 1 of the companies that reported one or more PSE provided information on the material released. In, 19 of the companies that reported one or more PSE provided information on the material released. In, 2 of the companies that reported one or more PSE provided information on the material released. Information on the material released was provided for 77% of PSE for, 71% of PSE for and 78% of PSE reported for. 1 PSE by material released (%) % 47% 25% 3% 2% 29% 22% 5% 9% 32% 25% 5% 44% 25% 4% Unspecified Other gases or liquids Hazardous liquid Flammable gas Toxics Figure 32: PSE by material released

36 Process safety events data 36 In, 11 of the companies that reported more than one PSE provided information on the material released. In, 18 of the companies that reported more than one PSE provided information on the material released. In, 23 of the companies that reported more than one PSE provided information on the material released. Information on the material released was provided for 8% of PSE for, 7% of PSE for and 79% of PSE reported for. For information on scope see Appendix A. 1 PSE by material released (%) % 3% 21% 3% 53% 5% 32% 8% 46% 2% 32% 22% 4% 1% 3% Unspecified Other gases or liquids Hazardous liquid Flammable gas Toxics Figure 33: PSE by material released

37 Appendix A 37 Appendix A: Data tables Year Work hours ( s) Total Number of PSE Number of PSE for normalized results* Employee/Contractor Fatalities (number deaths) 3rd Party Fatalities (number deaths) Fatality or LWDC as consequence (number PSE) 3rd Party Hospitalization or Fatality as consequence (number PSE) Total Total Total Total Total Total 2 *Excludes PSE where no related drilling or production work hours were reported. Table A.1a): Summary of data

38 Process safety events data 38 Year Work hours ( s) Total Number of PSE Number of PSE for normalized results* Recordable Injury as consequence (number PSE) Total Total Total *Excludes PSE where no related drilling or production work hours were reported. Table A.1b): Summary of data

39 Appendix A 39 Number of PSE Number of PSE for normalized results* PSE Rate (per million work hours) *Excludes PSE where work hours were not categorized as drilling or production (i.e. work hours were not specified by function). For related work hours for normalized results, see Table A.3 (Scope onshore and offshore). Table A.2: Number of PSE and PSE Rate onshore and offshore Companies reporting PSE data Data sets where PSE data reported Related work hours (millions) Work hours as % of total IOGP safety database* *Work hours for PSE data as percentage of total drilling + production work hours in entire IOGP safety database. Not all of the companies that submitted drilling and production work hours within the IOGP safety performance database submitted process safety event data. A number less than 1% indicates that process safety events are not reported for all drilling and production work hours in the entire safety database. PSE data set: A set of data with distinct company, country and location (onshore/offshore) where PSE data have been entered (i.e. not blank). Table A.3: Scope onshore and offshore

40 Process safety events data 4 Number of PSE Number of PSE for normalized results* PSE Rate (per million work hours) Overall Overall Overall *Excludes PSE where work hours were not categorized as drilling or production (i.e. work hours were not specified by function). For related work hours for normalized results, see Table A.5 (Scope drilling). Table A.4: Total number of PSE and PSE Rate drilling Companies reporting PSE data Data sets where PSE data reported Related work hours (millions) Overall Overall Overall Related work hours have not been provided for all reported PSE. Table A.5: Scope drilling

41 Appendix A 41 Number of PSE Number of PSE for normalized results* PSE Rate (per million work hours) Overall Overall Overall *Excludes PSE where related production work hours were not reported. For related work hours for normalized results see Table A.7 (Scope production). Table A.6: Total number of PSE and PSE Rate production Companies reporting PSE data Data sets where PSE data reported Related work hours (millions) Overall Overall Overall Related work hours have not been provided for all reported PSE. Table A.7: Scope production

42 Process safety events data 42 Activity Normal operations Start Up Shut Down Other Unspecified Table A.8: Number of production PSE by activity

43 Appendix A 43 Consequence Year Fatality or LWDC rd Party Hospitalization or Fatality 2 Community Evacuation Fire or Explosion PRD Discharges Material Release More than one consequence can be assigned to each PSE. Table A.9: Number of consequences assigned to PSE Consequence Year Recordable Injury Fire or Explosion PRD Discharges Material Release More than one consequence can be assigned to each PSE. Table A.1: Number of consequences assigned to PSE

44 Process safety events data 44 Number of PSE for normalized results* PSE Rate (per 1 million work hours) Number of fatalities for normalized results* Fatality Rate (per 1 million work hours) Consequence Year Fatality or LWDC Fatality rd Party Hospitalization/ Fatality 2 Fatality or LWDC Fatality rd Party Hospitalization/ Fatality...33 Employee/Contractor rd Party Employee/Contractor rd Party... *Excludes PSE and fatalities where related drilling or production work hours were not reported. For related work hours for normalized results see Table A.13 (PSE by consequence scope). Table A.11: Number of PSE and number of fatalities for normalized results and PSE Rates by consequence Number of PSE Number of PSE for normalized results* PSE Rate (per 1 million work hours) *Excludes PSE and fatalities where related drilling or production work hours were not reported. For related work hours for normalized results see Table A.13 (PSE by consequence scope). Table A.12: Number of PSE and PSE Rate for PSE with Fire or Explosion as consequence

45 Appendix A 45 Companies reporting PSE data by consequence Data sets where PSE reported by consequence Related work hours (millions) Consequence is only specified where 1 or more PSE are reported. Related work hours were not provided for all reported PSE. PSE data set: A set of data with distinct company, country and location (onshore/offshore) where PSE data have been entered (i.e. not blank). Table A.13: PSE by consequence scope

46 Process safety events data 46 Material Toxics Flammable gas Hazardous liquid Other gases or liquids Unspecified Table A.14: Number of PSE by material released Companies reporting PSE data by material released Data sets where PSE reported by material released Related work hours (millions) Material released is only specified where 1 or more PSE are reported. Related work hours were not provided for all reported PSE. PSE data set: A set of data with distinct company, country and location (onshore/offshore) where PSE data have been entered (i.e. not blank). Table A.15: PSE by material released scope

47 Appendix B 47 Appendix B: Company results In this appendix, and PSE rates are shown by company for each of the 3 reporting years in rank order of PSE performance. Company names have been replaced with a 2-letter code. A new code is assigned every year. 26 companies contributed PSE data in (32 in and 39 in ). This is in comparison to 45 companies contributing to the safety performance indicators database in (49 in and 5 in ). All of the remaining companies reported data relating to PSE for each of the 3 reporting years. Data relating to PSE were not reported by 5 of the companies in (2 companies in and 1 company in ). These are marked No data in the tables and graphs below. Overall means the rate for all companies. Data are excluded from PSE rate calculations where work hours are not reported for the data set. This means that 2 of the 26 companies reporting data, 2 of the 32 companies reporting data, and 1 of the 39 companies reporting data, are excluded from the analyses of PSE rates in this report overall PSE per million work hours nd overall no data nd _OQ _NQ _AJ _JS _PX _IB nd _EJ _XW _NC nd _RT _ET _PS _OE nd _AI Company code _FD _VC _RG _AD _IU _KP _KT _OR _PQ nd _DB Figure B.1: Performance ranking of participating companies PSE rate

48 Process safety events data overall PSE per million work hours nd overall no data _KI nd _TW _VI _EK _UY _SX _WS _AI _XB _SO _GD _RY _EM _UJ _TM nd _DU _YA _MO _KY _VG _NN _AR _UD _LF _DO _AX _OM _XX _MS _MY Company code Figure B.2: Performance ranking of participating companies PSE rate overall PSE per million work hours nd overall no data _BE _BI _NA _PL nd _TP _YP _AR _HD _HV _TG _IK _FL _UU _FS _MW _FR _XR _YL _AC _HA _TH _EV _XT _OW _KC _AB _OG _JD _GW _IC _EB _GB _JA _KK _KX _PS _UW _XP Company code Figure B.3: Performance ranking of participating companies PSE rate

49 Appendix B 49 Company Code PSE Rate PSE Rate _OQ 1.13 No data _NQ 1.1. _AJ _JS _PX _IB _EJ.22 No data _XW _NC.18.7 _RT.13 No data _ET.1.11 _PS.9.4 _OE.6 No data _AI.4.1 _FD..16 _VC..15 _RG..9 _AD.. _IU.. _KP.. _KT.. _OR.. _PQ.. _DB. No data Table B.1: PSE rate by company Company Code PSE Rate PSE Rate _KI _TW 1.23 No data _VI _EK _UY _SX _WS _AI _XB _SO _GD _RY.15. _EM _UJ.14. _TM.12 No data _DU.1.37 _YA.1.12 _MO.8.17 _KY.6.91 _VG.6.17 _NN.6. _AR.4.13 _UD.4.12 _LF.3.17 _DO.3.5 _AX _OM _XX..47 _MS.. _MY.. Table B.2: PSE rate by company

50 Process safety events data 5 Company Code PSE Rate PSE Rate _BE _BI _NA _PL.71 No data _TP _YP _AR _HD.4.4 _HV _TG _IK _FL _UU _FS _MW.13.6 _FR _XR _YL _AC _HA.9.7 Company Code PSE Rate PSE Rate _TH.7.36 _EV.3. _XT _OW _KC _AB..92 _OG..55 _JD..43 _GW..11 _IC..4 _EB.. _GB.. _JA.. _KK.. _KX.. _PS.. _UW.. _XP.. Table B.3: PSE rate by company

51 Appendix C 51 Appendix C: Report forms (for reference only) TIER 1 Note: A single PSE may result in multiple consequences; therefore the total of all columns below should equal or exceed Total PSE CONSEQUENCE: Number of PSE that resulted in these consequences (all that apply) Fatal PSE and Fatalities Location Function production drilling production drilling Total Total Process Safety Events (PSE) Employee or Contractor Fatality or LWDC Third party hospiltalizaion or fatility Community Evacuation or Shelter-inplace Fire or explosion >$25, loss PRD discharges above thresholds Material release above threshold Events resulting in one or more fatalities Total number of Employee and Contractor Fatalities (No. Fatalities) Total number of 3rd Party Fatalities (No. 3rd Party Fatalities) Additional data (if available) Location Function Total Process Safety Events (PSE) - Material Toxics (cat. 1-4) Note: Total numbers of PSE recorded in both tables below msut equal Total PSE above MATERIAL: Number of PSE by Material (only one category per event) Flammable gas (cat. 5) Hazardous Liquid (cat 6 or 7) Other gases or liquids Total Process Safety Events (PSE) - Activity ACTIVITY: Number of PSE by Activity (only one activity per event) Start-up Normal Operations Shutdown production drilling production drilling Total Other TIER 2 Location Function production drilling production drilling Total Total Process Safety Events (PSE) Note: A single PSE may result in multiple consequences; therefore the total of all columns below should equal or exceed Total PSE CONSEQUENCE: Number of PSE that resulted in these consequences (all that apply) Employee or Contractor Recordable Injury Fire or explosion > $2,5 loss PRD discharges above thresholds Material release above threshold Additional data (if available) Location Function Total Process Safety Events (PSE) - Material Toxics (cat. 1-4) Note: Total numbers of PSE recorded in both tables below must equal Total PSE above MATERIAL: Number of PSE by Material (only one category per event) Flammable gas (cat. 5) Hazardous Liquid (cat 6 or 7) Other gases or liquids Total Process Safety Events (PSE) - Activity ACTIVITY: Number of PSE by Activity (only one activity per event) Start-up Normal Operations Shutdown production drilling production drilling Total Other

52 Registered Office Level Blackfriars Rd London SE1 8NL United Kingdom T +44 () F +44 () reception@iogp.org Brussels Office Bd du Souverain,165 4th Floor B-116 Brussels Belgium T +32 () F +32 () The Process Safety Event data presented in this report are based on voluntary submissions from participating IOGP member companies and are not representative of the entire upstream oil and gas industry. Since this is only the second PSE report published by IOGP, readers are cautioned not to attempt to identify trends at this point. The Process Safety Events (PSE) data presented are based on the numbers of and PSE reported by participating IOGP member companies, separately for: onshore and offshore drilling and production activities consequences material released.