SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2013 DATA

Transcription

1 SAFETY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 213 DATA Report No. 213s (July 214) OGP DATA SERIES International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

2 P ublications Global experience The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers has access to a wealth of technical knowledge and experience with its members operating around the world in many different terrains. We collate and distil this valuable knowledge for the industry to use as guidelines for good practice by individual members. Consistent high quality database and guidelines Our overall aim is to ensure a consistent approach to training, management and best practice throughout the world. The oil and gas exploration and production industry recognises the need to develop consistent databases and records in certain fields. OGP s members are encouraged to use the guidelines as a starting point for their operations or to supplement their own policies and regulations which may apply locally. Internationally recognised source of industry information Many of our guidelines have been recognised and used by international authorities and safety and environmental bodies. Requests come from governments and non-government organisations around the world as well as from non-member companies. Disclaimer Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, neither OGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient s own risk on the basis that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms. Copyright notice The contents of these pages are The International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of OGP and (ii) the source are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved. Any other use requires the prior written permission of the OGP. These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

3 OGP safety performance indicators 213 data Report No: 213s July 214 Revision history Version Date Amendments 1.1 August 214 Minor correction to TRIR and LTIF definitions (pp 3-2 and 3-3) 1. July 214 First issued

4 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Preface The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, OGP, has been collecting safety incident data from its member companies globally since The data collected are entered into the OGP safety database, which is the largest database of safety performance in the E&P industry. The principal purpose of the data collection and analysis is to record the global safety performance of the contributing OGP member companies on an annual basis. The submission of data is voluntary and is not mandated by OGP membership. The annual reports provide trend analysis, benchmarking and the identification of areas and activities on which efforts should be focused to bring about the greatest improvements in performance. The OGP incident reporting system covers worldwide exploration and production (E&P) operations, both onshore and offshore, and includes incidents involving both member companies and their contractor employees. The key indicators presented are: number of fatalities, fatal accident rate, fatal incident rate, number of lost work day cases and number of lost work days, total recordable injury rate, lost time injury frequency, number of restricted duty case and restricted duty days, and number of medical treatment cases. The report presents contributing OGP members global results for these indicators, which are then analysed by region, function and company. A code is used to preserve the anonymity of the reporting company, which will typically report its own data as well as that of its associated contractors (see Appendix C). In 21, data collection was initiated to capture causal factors associated with fatal incidents and high potential events. These data are presented in section 2.11 of this report. Wherever practicable, results are presented graphically. The data underlying the charts are presented in Appendix B. The causal factors and chart data are available to OGP members in editable format from the members area of the OGP website. The tables are organised according to the section in the report where the chart appears. Fatal incident and high potential event descriptions previously included in this report as appendices C and D are now available for download on the OGP Safety Zone website: The main changes to the 213 report are: The addition of TRIR presented by country (see Section 3.7) FAR and LTIF by function are now presented as 5-year rolling average instead of the 3-year rolling average The region previously named South is now referred to as South & Central. The change does not affect the historical results in this report. These changes reflect the Safety Data Subcommittee s aim to improve the consistency of presentation of the data. Scope of reporting and data validation This report is published with two separate addendums which can be downloaded from the OGP public website. These provide the narrative descriptions for the fatal incidents and high potential events which have been reported by the participating member companies. The data requested from participating OGP member companies are published in an annual User Guide in two parts: Part A contains definitions and the scope of the safety data submission. This document is published on the OGP public website. Part B contains practical information for the Company nominees submitting the data, copies of the data submission forms and a data submission checklist. companies is conducted by the OGP secretariat and any data validated by an OGP workgroup is blind coded to preserve the anonymity of the reporting companies. A self-assessment questionnaire is included within the data submission process to determine the alignment between the requested data and the company submissions. The information provided in this questionnaire is also used in the validation process. Data that appear to be incorrect and that cannot be confirmed by the submitting company as correct may be excluded from the data set at the discretion of the secretariat. The scope of data included within this report is detailed in Appendix A. The safety data submission process is used for the collection of data relating to safety performance, process safety performance and motor vehicle crashes. The OGP safety database has built-in data validation requirements and each company data submission is validated by the OGP secretariat and the workgroup (Safety Committee Sub- Committee, Task Force or Network) responsible for the data set in accordance with the OGP data collection and reporting procedure. Any communication with reporting ii OGP

5 Safety performance indicators 213 data Data series Other OGP data reports include: Environmental Performance Indicators Health Performance Indicatorst Process Safety Event Data. These are available from the OGP website: OGP iii

6 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers The safety statistics for 213 were derived from data provided by the following companies: Contributing OGP Members Addax Petroleum Limited Adnoc Anadarko Bashneft BG Group BHP BP Cairn Energy Cairn India Chevron CNOOC ConocoPhillips Dolphin Energy Dong E&P E.ON eni ExxonMobil GALP GDF Suez E&P International Hess Corporation INPEX Kosmos Kuwait Oil Company Maersk Oil Marathon Oil Company MOL Nexen Inc Oil Search OMV Pan n Energy Pemex Perenco Petrobras PETRONAS Carigali Sdn Bhd Premier Oil PTT EP Qatar Petroleum RasGas Repsol RWE Dea AG Sasol Shell Companies Statoil Suncor Talisman Energy Total Tullow Oil Wintershall Woodside Yemen LNG iv OGP

7 Safety performance indicators 213 data Contents Executive Summary vii 1. Summary General Fatalities Total recordable injuries Lost time injuries Overall results Fatalities Fatal accident rate (FAR) Fatalities by incident category and activity Number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) Lost work day cases by categories and activities Severity of lost work day cases Severity of restricted work day cases Incident triangles Causal factors analysis OGP Life-Saving Rules Results by region Fatalities by region Fatal accident rate (FAR) by region Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by region Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) by region FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages by region Severity of lost work day cases by region Individual country performance Incident triangles by region Results by function Fatalities by function Fatal accident rate (FAR) 5-year rolling average Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by function Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 5-year rolling average by function Severity of lost work day cases by function Exploration performance Drilling performance Production performance Construction performance Unspecifed performance Results by company Overall company results Company results by function Appendix A: Database dimensions A-1 Appendix B: Data tables B-1 Appendix C: Contributing companies C-1 Appendix D: Countries represented D-1 Appendix E: Glossary of terms E-1 OGP v

8 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers vi OGP

9 Safety performance indicators 213 data Executive Summary The 213 OGP Safety Performance Indicators show that the Fatal Accident Rate for reporting companies has decreased by 11% compared with 212. The number of fatalities has decreased from 88 in 212 to 8 in of the fatalities reported in 213 occurred in 3 incidents. Analysis of the fatal incident descriptions has shown that at least 67% of the fatal incidents reported in 213 can be linked to failure to follow the OGP Life Saving Rules published in March 212, see OGP report 459. There are a number of common causal factors related to the fatal incidents and high potential events from 21 to 213. The top 5 causal factors for 213 are also the 5 causal factors that consistently appear in the 212, 211 and 21 top 1 for both fatal incidents and high potential events. These are: Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment The 6 th most common causal factor for fatal incidents, which did not show in the top 1 for High Potential Events, was: People (acts): Following procedures: Improper position (line of fire) Personal injury performance shows the lost time injury frequency decreasing by 6% and the total recordable injury rate decreasing by 8% compared with 212 results. However it can be seen that the severity of lost work day cases has increased. Four fatal incidents were as a result of process safety events. Fig.1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate [Data page B-2] Number of fatalities Fatalities FAR Fig.2: OGP Life-Saving Rules applicable to 213 fatal incidents per cent of total 213 incidents [Data page B-6] International Association of Oil & Gas Producers From OGP Safety Performance Indicators 213 data Insufficient information to assign a rule 14% No appropriate rule 19% Supplementary rules 51% Fig.3: Lost time injury frequency and total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-2 & B-3] FAR - Fatal accidents per 1 million hours worked Core rules 16% 5 TRIR LTIF Fatal accident rate (FAR) 4 The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours worked. 3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,, hours worked. 2 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 1 The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1,, hours worked OGP vii

10 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers viii OGP

11 Safety performance indicators 213 data 1. Summary The OGP safety performance indicators report summarises the safety performance of contributing OGP member companies for 213. The key performance indicators (KPI) used to benchmark safety performance are: number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, total recordable injury rate and lost time injury frequency. Third party fatalities are not included in this report. 1.1 General The safety performance of contributing OGP member companies in 213 is based on the analysis of million work hours of data. Submissions were made by 5 of the 62 operating company OGP members. The data reported cover operations in 11 countries. Hours worked millions [Data page B-19] work hours contractor 1 5 work hours company OGP 1-1

12 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1.2 Fatalities Fig 1.2.1: Fatalities by reporting category, 213 % fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3] Falls from height 3.8% Explosions or burns 5.% Pressure release 7.5% Caught in, under or between 8.8% Assault or violent act 11.3% Struck by 12.5% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.3% Overexertion, strain 1.3% Exposure electrical 1.3% Fig 1.2.2: Fatalities by activity, 213 % fatalities associated with each activity [Data page B-3] Unspecified other 3.8% Transport land 7.7% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 7.7% Production operations 11.5% Seismic/survey operations 2.6% Other 26.3% Water related, drowning 21.3% Transport air 21.8% Against the background of a 2% increase in work hours reported, the number of fatalities has decreased from 88 in 212 to 8 in 213. The 8 fatalities occurred in 43 separate incidents. The resulting Fatal Accident Rate (2.12) is 11% lower than last year s figure (2.38). The company and contractor FAR are 1.83 and 2.2 respectively. Onshore and offshore FAR are 1.7 and 3.27 respectively. The reported fatalities are divided into activity and category. The activity with the highest number of fatalities reported by the OGP member companies is Transport air (22%) with 17 fatalities as a result of 2 separate helicopter crash incidents. 13 fatalities (17%) were reported in 13 separate incidents in the Drilling, Workover, Well Services activity and 12 fatalities (15%) were reported in 2 separate events in the Transport water, including marine activity activity. These include a tug that capsized during static tow operations to an export tanker in Nigeria in which 11 contractor employees lost their lives. One incident was reported in the production operations activity (11% of the total fatalities) in which 9 company employees lost their lives in a terror attack in Algeria. With regard to the incident category, 21 of the fatalities reported in 213 (26%) were categorised as Other and were related to 5 fatal incidents including the 2 helicopter crashes in which 17 people died and 3 incidents in which 4 people died for which the details were not available (2% of fatal incidents reported in 212 were in the category Other ). Fatalities categorised as Water related, drowning were the second greatest contributors to the fatality statistics with 17 fatalities in 6 separate incidents, accounting for 21% of the fatalities (1% in 212). This includes the incident in Nigeria where a tug capsized resulting in 11 contractor deaths. Drilling, workover, well services 16.7% Maintenance, inspection, testing 12.8% Transport water, inc. marine activity 15.4% 1-2 OGP

13 Safety performance indicators 213 data The fatal accident rate for 213 is 2.12, 11% lower than the 212 rate. The offshore FAR (3.27) for 213 is more than three times the 212 result (.89) and the onshore rate (1.7) fell by 41%. Fig 1.2.3: Fatal accident rate - company and contractors per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] 8 Overall Company FAR 6 Contractor FAR OGP 1-3

14 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1.3 Total recordable injuries Fig 1.3.1: Total recordable injury rate company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-2] Overall Contractor Company The rate for all recordable injuries (fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases) was 1.6 injuries per million hours worked (1.74 in 212). The only region that showed an increase in TRIR in 213 compared with the TRIR for 212 was South & Central (3%). A reduction in TRIR from 212 to 213 was shown in Africa (8%), Asia/Australasia (29%), Europe (2%), FSU (18%), Middle East (12%) and North (9%) OGP

15 Safety performance indicators 213 data 1.4 Lost time injuries The overall Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) fell from.48 in 212 to.45 in 213. This represents a reduction of 6% compared with 212 and 72 fewer lost time injuries. This reduction is similar in both company and contractor performance. The company and contractor LTIF both show a reduction compared with 212 (15% and 4% respectively). The onshore and offshore LTIF both also show a reduction compared with 212 (11% and 5% respectively). There were 1627 reported injuries resulting in at least one day off work, 1312 incidents were contractor related and 315 were company related. OGP member companies reported days of work lost through injuries. The greatest number of incidents was reported as Struck by (367 cases accounting for 23% of the total; 212 results showed 48 cases accounting for 24% of the total). Caught in, under or between accounted for 341 cases, 21% of the total (21% of the total in 212). The lost time injury frequency has plateaued from 27 for both companies and contractors. Fig 1.4.1: Lost time injury frequency company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-3] Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.2% Water related, drowning 1.3% Explosions or burns 3.7% Fig 1.4.2: Lost work day cases by category % LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-4] Exposure electrical.9% Pressure release.7% Assault or violent act.6% Overall Contractor Company 212 Confined space.2% Struck by 22.6% 213 Other 5.3% Cut, puncture, scrape 6.1% Overexerstion, strain 8.5% Falls from height 1.8% Caught in, under or between 21.% Slips and trips (at same height) 17.1% Fig 1.4.3: Lost work day cases by activity % LWDCs associated with each activity [Data page B-4] Transport air 1.7% Seismic/survey operations.9% Transport land 5.6% Transport water, including marine activity 6.5% Diving, subsea, ROV.6% Drilling, workover, well services 2.% Unspecified other 7.3% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 8.4% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 9.% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14.8% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 11.6% Production operations 13.7% OGP 1-5

16 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 1-6 OGP

17 Safety performance indicators 213 data 2. Overall results In this section the primary indicators used to measure contributing OGP member companies safety performance are; the number and nature of fatalities, total recordable injury rate (TRIR), fatal accident rate (FAR), fatal incidents per 1 million work hours, and lost time injury frequency (LTIF). Third party incidents are not included in this report. 2.1 Fatalities Fatalities Onshore 213 (212) Offshore 213 (212) Total 213 (212) Company 13 (1) 2 (2) 15 (12) Contractor 34 (7) 31 (6) 65 (76) Total 47 (8) 33 (8) 8 (88) Company/contractor fatalities 8 company and contractor fatalities were reported in 213. This is 8 fewer than were reported in 212 and 15 more than in 211. The 8 fatalities occurred in 43 separate incidents. In 213, 13 contractors died as a result of a single helicopter crash in the rainforest in Peru. 11 contractors died when a tug capsized during static tow operations to an export tanker in Nigeria. 9 company employees and 31 third party individuals died as the result of a terror attack in Algeria. 4 contractors died as a result of a helicopter ditching in the sea in the UK. There were 4 incidents that involved 2 fatalities. These were; êêa boat crashed and sank during a water inspection in Mexico êêan oil tank exploded during a maintenance operation in China êêa fatal incident in the USA, no further information has been provided êêan uncontrolled release of pressure from a gas cooler in the Netherlands during a leak test Fig 2.1.1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate [Data page B-2] Number of fatalities International Association of Oil & Gas Producers From OGP Safety Performance Indicators 213 data Fatalities FAR FAR - Fatal accidents per 1 million hours worked OGP 2-1

18 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) Fig 2.2.1: Fatal accident rate company & contractors per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] 8 6 Overall Company FAR Contractor FAR 213 (212) FAR Relative to 212 FAR Company 1.83 (1.58) (16% higher) Contractor 2.2 (2.59) (15% lower) Overall 2.12 (2.38) (11% lower) Onshore 1.7 (2.87) (41% lower) Offshore 3.27 (.89) (267% higher) Fig 2.2.2: Fatal accident rate onshore & offshore per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-2] Overall Onshore Offshore 213 In 213 there were 15 company fatalities (12 in 212) as a result of 7 separate incidents. êê9 of the company fatalities were as a result of a single terror attack in Algeria in which a further 31 third party individuals lost their lives. In 213 there were 65 contractor fatalities (76 in 212). êê13 of the contractor fatalities were the result of a single helicopter crash in the rainforest in Peru. êê11 of the contractor fatalities were the result of a tug capsize during static tow operations to an export tanker in Nigeria. The difference between the onshore and offshore FAR displays a large variation over the 1-year period shown. Neither is consistently lower. This is generally attributable to single transportation or fire and explosion incidents involving high numbers of fatalities Fatal accident rate (FAR) The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1 (1 million) hours worked. 2-2 OGP

19 Safety performance indicators 213 data 2.3 Fatalities by incident category and activity The largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 213 were categorised as Other (26%) (2% in 212). êê13 of the fatalities were as a result of a single helicopter crash in the rainforest in Peru êê4 of the fatalities were the result of a helicopter ditching into the sea in the UK êêno detailed information was provided by the reporting company for 2 incidents 21% of the fatalities reported in 213 were categorised as Water related, drowning (1% in 212). êê11 contractor employees lost their lives when a tug capsized during static tow operations to an export tanker in Nigeria êê2 workers died when their boat crashed and sank during a water inspection in Mexico êêa technician drowned while bathing in a river in Peru êêone man was lost overboard when a seismic vessel was hit by unexpected waves in Uruguay êêa contractor was lost overboard when the rig that he was working on capsized in Angola êêa mud logger fell into the sea from the access ramp to a tender barge in Myanmar 13% of the fatalities reported in 213 were the result of individuals being struck by falling or moving objects (16% in 212). êêtwo of the fatalities involved separate motor vehicle crashes 11% of the fatalities reported in 213 were categorised as Assault or violent act (3% in 212) and were the result of a single terror attack in Algeria. A reduction is seen in the number of deaths resulting from land transport incidents (6 fatalities) compared with 212 (9 fatalities in 212, 15 in 211). êê6 fatalities were associated with 6 separate incidents 35 of the fatal incidents involved one fatality. Incidents which involved 2 or more fatalities were reported under the categories: êêother (3 incidents). êêwater related, drowning (2 incidents). êêassault and violent act (1 incident). êêexplosions or burns (1 incident). êêpressure release (1 incident). There were no fatal incidents reported under the following categories: êêcut, puncture, scrape. êêconfined space. êêslips, trips, falls (at same height). Fig 2.3.1: Fatalities by reporting category 213 % fatalities associated with each reporting category [Data page B-3] Falls from height 3.8% Explosions or burns 5.% Pressure release 7.5% Caught in, under or between 8.8% Assault or violent act 11.3% Struck by 12.5% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.3% Overexertion, strain 1.3% Fig 2.3.2: Fatalities by activity, 213 % fatalities associated with each activity [Data page B-3] Unspecified other 3.8% Transport land 7.7% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 7.7% Production operations 11.5% Maintenance, inspection, testing 12.8% Seismic/survey operations 2.6% Exposure electrical 1.3% Other 26.3% Water related, drowning 21.3% Transport air 21.8% Drilling, workover, well services 16.7% Transport water, inc. marine activity 15.4% OGP 2-3

20 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Fatalities by incident category and activity, 213 Assault or violent act Caught in, under or between Confined space Cut, puncture, scrape Explosion or burns Exposure electrical Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release Slips, trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning Other Total Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations 9 9 Seismic/survey operations Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other 3 3 Total OGP

21 Safety performance indicators 213 data 2.4 Number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours Number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours 213 (212) Relative to 212 Fig 2.4.1: Fatal incidents per 1 million work hours company & contractors [Data page B-2] Company.85 (.79) (8% higher) Contractor 1.22 (1.57) (22% lower) Overall 1.14 (1.41) (19% lower) Onshore.94 (1.58) (41% lower) Offshore 1.68 (.89) (89% higher) 6 Overall Contractor Company Overall FAR* 4 The number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours is a measure of the frequency with which fatal incidents occur, in contrast to the FAR which measures the frequency of fatalities. Accordingly, for company and contractor fatalities, the number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours will be less than or equal to the FAR. Comparison of FAR and number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours gives an indication of the magnitude of the incidents in terms of lives lost. Overall the number of fatal incidents per 1 million work hours has decreased by 19% compared with last year and is the lowest on record (43 fatal incidents in 213, 52 fatal incidents in 212) *FAR: Fatal Accident Rate (Number of fatalities per 1 million hours worked) Fig 2.4.2: Fatal incidents per 1 million work hours onshore & offshore [Data page B-2] Overall Onshore Offshore Overall FAR* 4 Fig 2.4.3: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents 1 year trend Fatalities Fatal incidents *FAR: Fatal Accident Rate (Number of fatalities per 1 million hours worked) Fatal incidents per 1 million work hours The number of incidents that result in one or more fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours. OGP 2-5

22 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Fig 2.5.1: Total recordable injury rate company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-2] 6 5 Overall Contractor Company 213 (212) TRIR Relative to 212 TRIR Company.95 (1.12) (15% lower) Contractor 1.77 (1.9) (7% lower) Overall 1.6 (1.74) (8% lower) Onshore 1.33 (1.49) (11% lower) Offshore 2.34 (2.53) (8% lower) Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a dataset of 3665 million hours, 97% of the database (see Appendix A). An overall reduction in TRIR of 8% is seen in Fig 2.5.2: Total recordable injury rate onshore & offshore per million hours worked [Data page B-2] 6 5 Overall Onshore Offshore Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1 hours worked. 2-6 OGP

23 Safety performance indicators 213 data 2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 213 (212) LTIF Relative to 212 LTIF Company.4 (.47) (15% lower) Contractor.47 (.49) (4% lower) Overall.45 (.48) (6% lower) Onshore.34 (.38) (11% lower) Offshore.77 (.81) (5% lower) Fig 2.6.1: Lost time injury frequency company & contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-3] Overall Contractor Company The overall LTIF decreased by 6% from.48 in 212 to.45 in 213. The company LTIF decreased by 15% compared with There were 1627 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, which equates to an average of 31 injuries resulting in at least one day off work every week of the year. Although the absolute number of LWDCs has reduced (1699 in 212), the time away from work has increased compared with 212. See Section 2.8 for further information on Lost Work Day Case severity Fig 2.6.2: Lost time injury frequency onshore & offshore per million hours worked [Data page B-3] Overall Onshore Offshore Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1 hours worked. OGP 2-7

24 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.7 Lost work day cases by categories and activities Fig 2.7.1: Lost work day cases by category % LWDCs associated with each reporting category [Data page B-4] Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.2% Water related, drowning 1.3% Explosions or burns 3.7% Other 5.3% Cut, puncture, scrape 6.1% Overexerstion, strain 8.5% Exposure electrical.9% Pressure release.7% Assault or violent act.6% Confined space.2% Struck by 22.6% Lost work day cases by category Number % Assault or violent act 1.6 Caught in, under or between Confined space 4.2 Cut, puncture, scrape Explosion or burns Exposure electrical 14.9 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 11.7 Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning Other Total 1627 Falls from height 1.8% Caught in, under or between 21.% Slips and trips (at same height) 17.1% Of the 1627 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 1312 incidents (81%) were contractorrelated and 315 (19%) were company-related (1356 and 343 respectively for 212). The lost work day case category was provided for all of the Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 5% of the cases were categorised as Other. The pie chart shows the percentage of LWDCs within each of the reporting categories for 213. The greatest number of incidents was reported as Struck by (367 cases accounting for 23% of LWDCs), (212 results showed 48 cases accounting for 24%). Caught in, under or between accounted for 21% of the total reported cases (21% in 212). In comparison with 212, the 213 results were very similar. Lost work day case (LWDC) A Lost work day case is an incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included. 2-8 OGP

25 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost work day cases by category company & contractors Company Contractor Assault or violent act 2 8 Caught in, under or between Confined space 4 Cut, puncture, scrape 29 7 Explosion or burns 8 52 Exposure electrical 2 12 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 3 17 Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 2 9 Slips and trips (at same height) 79 2 Struck by Water related, drowning 2 19 Other Total Fig 2.7.2: Lost work day cases by category Company [Data page B-5] Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.% Explosions or burns 2.5% Other 5.1% Cut, puncture, scrape 9.2% Falls from height 1.5% Assault or violent act.6% Exposure Electrical.6% Pressure release.6% Water related, drowning.6% Slips and trips (at same height) 25.1% Of the 1627 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 879 incidents (54%) were related to onshore activity and 748 (46%) were related to offshore activity (972 and 727 respectively for 212). Overexertion, strain 11.1% Struck by 12.7% Fig 2.7.3: Lost work day cases by category Contractor [Data page B-5] Caught in, under or between 2.3% Water related, drowning 1.4% Exposure Electrical.9% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.3% Pressure release.7% Assault or violent act.6% Confined space.3% Explosions or burns 4.% Cut, puncture, scrape 5.3% Struck by 24.9% Other 5.4% Overexertion, strain 7.9% Falls from height 1.9% Slips and trips (at same height) 15.2% Caught in, under or between 21.1% OGP 2-9

26 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost work day cases by category onshore & offshore Fig 2.7.4: Lost work day cases by category Onshore [Data page B-5] Assault or violent act.8% Pressure release.9% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 1.6% Explosions or burns 4.3% Cut, puncture, scrape 4.8% Other 7.3% Overexertion, strain 7.4% Falls from height 11.9% Fig 2.7.5: Lost work day cases by category Offshore [Data page B-5] Exposure Electrical.5% Confined space.3% Water related, drowning.3% Struck by 23.7% Slips and trips (at same height) 2.% Caught in, under or between 16.2% Onshore Offshore Assault or violent act 7 3 Caught in, under or between Confined space 3 1 Cut, puncture, scrape Explosion or burns Exposure electrical 4 1 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration 14 6 Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 8 3 Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning 3 18 Other Total Of the 1627 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work, 879 incidents (54%) were related to onshore activity and 748 (46%) were related to offshore activity (972 and 727 respectively for 212). Exposure Electrical 1.3% Water related, drowning 2.4% Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration.8% Assault or violent act.4% Explosions or burns 2.9% Other 3.1% Pressure release.4% Confined space.1% Cut, puncture, scrape 7.6% Caught in, under or between 26.6% Falls from height 9.5% Overexertion, strain 9.8% Slips and trips (at same height) 13.8% Struck by 21.3% 2-1 OGP

27 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost work day cases by activity Number % Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 9.6 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations 14.9 Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Total 1627 Fig 2.7.6: Lost work day cases by activity % LWDCs associated with each activity [Data page B-5] Transport land 5.6% Transport water, including marine activity 6.5% Unspecified other 7.3% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 8.4% Transport air 1.7% Seismic/survey operations.9% Diving, subsea, ROV.6% Drilling, workover, well services 2.% Lost work day case activities were reported for all of the 1627 Lost Work Day Cases reported, although 7% of the cases were reported as Unspecified-other. In 212, 12% were reported as Unspecified-other. In comparison with 212, 213 results were very similar. Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 9.% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 11.6% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14.8% Production operations 13.7% OGP 2-11

28 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost work day cases by activity company & contractor Fig 2.7.7: Lost work day cases by activity Company [Data page B-5] Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 2.9% Transport land 4.1% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 8.3% Drilling, workover, well services 8.9% Transport air 1.9% Transport water, including marine activity.6% Production operations 28.9% Company Contractor Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 9 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations 14 Transport air 6 21 Transport land Transport water, including marine activity 2 14 Unspecified other Total Unspecified other 12.1% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 15.2% Maintenance, inspection, testing 17.1% Fig 2.7.8: Lost work day cases by activity Contractor [Data page B-5] Transport air 1.6% Seismic/survey operations1.1% Transport land 5.9% Diving, subsea, ROV.7% Unspecified other 6.2% Drilling, workover, well services 22.7% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 6.7% Transport water, including marine activity 7.9% Production operations 1.1% Maintenance, inspection, testing 14.3% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 1.4% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 12.4% 2-12 OGP

29 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost work day cases by activity onshore & offshore Onshore Offshore Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 1 8 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations 12 2 Transport air 7 2 Transport land 89 2 Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Total Fig 2.7.9: Lost work day cases by activity Onshore [Data page B-5] Transport water, including marine activity 1.5% Unspecified other 8.6% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 9.6% Transport land 1.1% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 1.4% Seismic/survey operations1.4% Transport air.8% Diving, subsea, ROV.1% Drilling, workover, well services 2.1% Production operations 14.1% Maintenance, inspection, testing 11.% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 12.3% Fig 2.7.1: Lost work day cases by activity Offshore [Data page B-5] Transport air 2.7% Construction, commissioning, decommissioning 5.1% Diving, subsea, ROV 1.1% Seismic/survey operations.3% Transport land.3% Unspecified other 5.7% Drilling, workover, well services 19.9% Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 6.% Transport water, including marine activity 12.4% Maintenance, inspection, testing 19.3% Production operations 13.2% Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations 14.% OGP 2-13

30 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.8 Severity of lost work day cases Fig 2.8.1: Severity of lost work day cases company & contractors average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-5] (212) severity Relative to 212 severity Relative to average severity Company (38.81) 12% higher 18% higher Contractor (41.28) 4% higher 6% higher 5 Overall (4.74) 6% higher 9% higher Onshore (36.83) 3% lower 1% lower 4 Offshore (45.99) 11% higher 11% higher Overall Contractor Company OGP member companies reported a total of days lost (LWDC days) through injuries. The number of days lost was reported for 66% of the database (see Appendix A and Appendix C). The offshore LWDC severity is 43% higher than onshore The number of days lost per lost work day case overall has increased by 6% compared with 212 results. Fig 2.8.2: Severity of lost work day cases onshore & offshore average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-5] Overall Onshore Offshore Severity of lost work day cases Severity is defined as the average number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case OGP

31 Safety performance indicators 213 data The figures show the average number of days lost per LWDC in 213 compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. A 9% increase is shown in overall LWDC severity when compared with the previous 5-year period. Fig 2.8.3: Severity of lost work day cases company & contractors average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-5] Company Contractor Overall Fig 2.8.4: Severity of lost work day cases onshore & offshore average days lost per LWDC [Data page B-5] Offshore Onshore Overall OGP 2-15

32 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases Fig 2.9.1: Severity of restricted work day cases company & contractors average days lost per RWDC [Data page B-6] (212) severity Relative to 212 severity Relative to severity Company (13.84) 24% higher 19% higher Contractor (12.5) 18% higher 16% higher Overall (12.21) 19% higher 16% higher Onshore (11.48) 34% higher 25% higher 15 Offshore 13.3 (13.41) 3% lower 2% higher Fig 2.9.2: Severity of restricted work day cases onshore & offshore average days lost per RWDC [Data page B-6] Overall Contractor Company A total of days were restricted (RWDC days) as a result of restricted work day cases, in the sense that normal duties could not be performed. This compares with days lost (LWDC days) on a 24% larger dataset (see Appendix A and Appendix C). The number of days lost per restricted work day case overall has increased by 19% compared with 212 results. The number of days lost to restricted work per case increased most noticeably in onshore operations with a rate of for 213, an increase of 34% compared with the 212 rate (11.48). The severity for company activities of represents an increase of 24% compared with the rate for 212 (13.84) Overall Onshore Offshore Severity of restricted work day cases The average number of days of restricted work per restricted work day case. Restricted work day case days are not reported by all companies. The database for this analysis is therefore reduced to 2,8 million work hours, 53% of all reported hours (see Appendix A) OGP

33 Safety performance indicators 213 data The figures show the average number of days lost per RWDC in 213 compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. The overall average shows an increase of 16% compared with the average for the previous 5-year period. Fig 2.9.3: Severity of restriced work day cases company & contractors average days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-6] Company Contractor Overall Fig 2.9.4: Severity of restriced work day cases onshore & offshore average days of restricted work per RWDC [Data page B-6] Offshore Onshore Overall OGP 2-17

34 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.1 Incident triangles Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities :1 73: :1 72: :1 93: :1 6: :1 63:1 In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in the form of incident triangles. The ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases. 213 incident triangles Overall 1 fatality 21 lost time injuries 73 recordable injuries Company 1 fatality 21 lost time injuries 48 recordable injuries Contractor 1 fatality 21 lost time injuries 79 recordable injuries 212 incident triangles Lost time injuries Lost work day cases and fatalities. Recordable injuries Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases. Data are only included where medical treatment cases are reported for the data set. Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities The number of lost time injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (Lost time injuries/ fatalities). Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities). Overall 1 fatality 2 lost time injuries 72 recordable injuries Company 1 fatality 28 lost time injuries 69 recordable injuries Contractor 1 fatality 18 lost time injuries 72 recordable injuries 2-18 OGP

35 Safety performance indicators 213 data The varying ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries to recordable injuries for challenges the traditional notion of recordable injuries and lost time injuries overall as a precursor to fatalities as shown in the incident triangles. In some incident categories however such as confined space, assault or violent act and water related, drowning, the ratio will be higher as shown in the tables below. Category LTIs (fatalities+lwdcs) Fatalities Ratio LTI: Fatality Assault or violent act :1 Caught in, under or between :1 Confined space 4 n/a Cut, puncture, scrape 99 n/a Explosions or burns :1 Exposure electrical :1 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration :1 Falls from height :1 Overexertion, strain :1 Pressure release :1 Slips and trips (at same height) 279 n/a Struck by :1 Water related, drowning :1 Other :1 Activity LTIs (fatalities+lwdcs) Fatalities Ratio LTI: Fatality Construction, commissioning, decommissioning :1 Diving, subsea, ROV 9 n/a Drilling, workover, well services :1 Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations :1 Maintenance, inspection, testing :1 Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering 136 n/a Production operations :1 Seismic / survey operations :1 Transport air :1 Transport land :1 Transport water, incl. marine activity :1 Unspecified other :1 OGP 2-19

36 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.11 Causal factors analysis The allocation of causal factors to fatal incidents and high potential events was requested as part of the 213 data submission. This request was first made in 21, therefore a comparison of four years of data is possible. To standardise the response an OGP list of causal factors and a glossary was provided to the member companies as part of the OGP User Guide. The causal factors list is divided into two sections: People (Acts) classifications usually involve either the actions of a person or actions which were required but not carried out or were incorrectly performed. There are four major categories of actions, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories. Process (Conditions) classifications usually involve some type of physical hazard or organizational aspect out of the control of the individual. There are five major classification categories, with an additional level of detail under each of the major categories. 2-2 OGP

37 Safety performance indicators 213 data Fatal incident causal factors Causal factors are divided into two separate groups, People (Acts) and Process (Conditions), see OGP User Guide (Report 213su) and Glossary for details. 34 of the 43 fatal incidents reported were assigned causal factors (47 of 52 in 212) 222 causal factors were assigned for the 43 fatal incidents Between 2 and 16 causal factors were assigned per incident (between 1 and 11 in 212). Causal factors assigned for fatal incidents People (acts) Process (conditions): The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 1 causal factors assigned to fatal incidents in 213 compared with 212, 211 and 21. Seven of the ten were the same for all four years. Additional information on the fatal incidents reported by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website: The information provided includes a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company. Note: the top 11 causal factors have been shown for 213, as both the 1th and 11th most common causal factors were both assigned to 9 of the incidents. Similarly the top 12 causal factors have been shown for 212, as the top 9th, 1th, 11th and 12th causal factors were each assigned 7 times. Causal factors assigned for fatal incidents Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire) People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group) People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/materials/products Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/materials/products Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energized equipment/inadequate energy isolation People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group) Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task 1 3 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Use of drugs or alcohol 1 People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue 1 1 OGP 2-21

38 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers High potential event causal factors 124 of the 179 high potential events were assigned causal factors (169 of 195 in 212) 444 causal factors were assigned for the 179 high potential events (63 in 212) Between 1 and 16 causal factors were assigned per event (between 1 and 14 in 212) Causal factors assigned for high potential events People (acts) Process (conditions): The causal factors assigned to high potential events are shown below. The highlighted content indicates the top 1 causal factors assigned tohigh potential events in 213 compared with 212, 211 and 21. Six of the ten were the same for all four years Additional information on the high potential events reported by region can be found on the OGP Safety Zone website: The information provided includes a narrative description of the event, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company. Note: the top 11 causal factors have been shown for 21, as the top 1th and 11th causal factors were each assigned 15 times. Causal Factors assigned for high potential events Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate design/specification/management of change Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/materials/products Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate communication Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision PeopleE (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/materials/products Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Failure to warn of hazard People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group) People (acts): Following Procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group) People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Inadequate use of safety systems People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Equipment or materials not secured Process (conditions): Organisational: Poor leadership/organisational culture People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire) People (acts): Following Procedures: Improper lifting or loading People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used improperly Process (conditions): Organisational: Failure to report/learn from events Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant) Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Storms or acts of nature People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Servicing of energized equipment/inadequate energy isolation People (acts): Following Procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task People (acts): Following Procedures: Work or motion at improper speed People (acts): Use of Protective Methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or safety devices Process (conditions): Work Place Hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads Process (conditions): Protective Systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Fatigue People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Acts of violence OGP

39 Safety performance indicators 213 data The following 8 causal factors were common to the top ten for both fatal incidents and high potential events in 213. Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment People (acts): Use of Tools, Equipment, Materials and Products: Improper use/position of tools/equipment/ materials/products Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing Process (conditions): Tools, Equipment, Materials & Products: Inadequate/defective tools/equipment/materials/ products The following 5 causal factors appear consistently in the top ten for both fatal incidents and high potential events for 213, 212, 211 and 21. Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate training/competence People (acts): Inattention/Lack of Awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgment Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate work standards/procedures Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate supervision Process (conditions): Organisational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment The 6 th most common causal factor for fatal incidents, which did not show in the top 1 for high potential events was: People (acts): Following procedures: Improper position (line of fire) OGP 2-23

40 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 2.12 OGP Life-Saving Rules OGP has released a set of life-saving rules (OGP Life-Saving Rules, OGP report 459, released Feb 212), intended for use by the oil & gas industry to mitigate risk and reduce fatalities. Each OGP Life-Saving Rule consists of a simple icon and descriptive text, providing clear, simple and consistent communication about risks in the workplace. These Rules were developed by using the fatal incident and high potential event data from the 1991 to 21 Safety Performance Indicators reports to identify the events and activities that are the highest risk and therefore provide clear instructions on how to avoid them. The Life-Saving Rules are split into 8 core rules and 1 supplemental rules. Assessment of the applicability of the OGP Life-Saving Rules to fatal incident descriptions for 213 data has shown that at least 67% of the fatal incidents reported are covered by the OGP Life-Saving Rules and may have been prevented by the adoption of this system. Insufficient information was provided to be able to assign a rule for 6 of the incidents. Fig : OGP Life-Saving Rules applicable to 213 fatal incidents per cent of total 213 incidents Insufficient information to assign a rule 14% No appropriate rule 19% Supplementary rules 51% Core rules 16% Fig : OGP Life-Saving Rules applicable to 213 fatal incidents per cent of total 213 incidents Line of fire safe area 32.6% Dropped objects 2.3% Gas test 2.3% Journey management 2.3% Overhead power lines 2.3% Suspended load 2.3% Seat belt 4.7% Work at height 7.% Flotation device 11.6% No appropriate rule 18.6% Insufficient information to assign a rule 14.% 2-24 OGP

41 Safety performance indicators 213 data 3. Results by region In this section the safety performance of the contributing OGP members is presented for regions and individual countries within those regions. A list of countries from which companies have reported information and the division of countries into regions is provided in Appendix D. Former Soviet Union North Europe Middle East Asia/ Australasia Africa South & Central 3.1 Fatalities by region Fatalities 213 (212) FAR 213 (212) Fatal incidents 213 (212) Africa 27 (17) 4.53 (2.83) 9 (13) Asia/Australasia 8 (1).87 (1.35) 7 (1) Europe 9 (2) 2.26 (.52) 5 (2) FSU 3 (2) 1.25 (.55) 3 (2) The table shows the number of fatal incidents and fatalities in each of the 7 regions into which the data are partitioned. Further analysis of the fatality statistics is presented in Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions. Middle East 4 (13).63 (1.95) 4 (11) North 12 (42) 2.3 (7.5) 1 (12) South & Central 17 (2) 4.37 (.54) 5 (2) Overall 8 (88) 2.12 (2.38) 43 (52) OGP 3-1

42 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 3.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) by region Fig 3.2.1: Fatal accident rate per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-7] Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Overall Further Fatal Accident Rate analysis is presented in Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions. Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Overall Fatal accident rate (FAR) The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1 (1 million) hours worked. 3.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by region Fig 3.3.1: Total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-7] Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Overall Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3665 million hours, 97% of the database (see Appendix A). Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Overall Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1 hours worked. 3-2 OGP

43 Safety performance indicators 213 data 3.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) by region LTIF Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Overall Fig 3.4.1: Lost time injury frequency per million hours worked [Data page B-7] Further analysis of the lost time injuries is presented in Section 3.5, where 5-year rolling averages of LTIF are presented for each of the regions, 1% of the database (see Appendix A) Africa Asia/ Europe Australasia FSU Middle East North South Overall Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per 1 hours worked. OGP 3-3

44 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 3.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages by region The five year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the five previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the five year rolling average for 213 is calculated by: (Number of injuries in ) (Total work hours in ) The number series involved in the calculation is frame shifted along by one each year, e.g. 211 will calculate from Fig 3.5.1: FAR 5-year rolling average per 1 million hours worked [Data from B-8] all regions Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central In order to smooth out variability in the annual values for the regional TRIR, FAR and LTIF, 5-year rolling averages are computed which should provide a more reliable indicator of performance trends. The figures show TRIR, FAR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages for each of the seven regions, and includes the all regions curve. The increase in the North 5-year rolling average FAR for 212 can be attributed to the effect of a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical integrity of a pipeline in Mexico (onshore) in which 31 individuals lost their lives Fig 3.5.2: TRIR 5-year rolling average per million hours worked [Data from B-9] Fig 3.5.3: LTIF 5-year rolling average per million hours worked [Data from B-9] 6 5 all regions Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central all regions Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central OGP

45 Safety performance indicators 213 data 3.6 Severity of lost work day cases by region LWDC severity 213 Relative to LWDC severity Africa % higher Asia/Australasia % higher Europe % higher FSU % higher Middle East % lower Fig 3.6.1: Severity of LWDC Average days lost per LWDC [Data from B-9] Average 213 North % higher South & Central % lower All regions % higher Average The number of days lost was reported for 65% of lost work day cases. The severity of lost work day cases is the highest in the South & Central region compared with the other regions (6 days lost per LWDC in 213). This represents a 16% reduction compared to the average for the previous 5-year period. Appendix A provides further information on the proportion of the database which can be used for lost work day case severity, 94% of the data submitted for South & Central was usable for this metric, in comparison with only 37% of equivalent data for the North region. 2 1 Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Lost work day case (LWDC) A Lost work day case is an incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included. Severity of lost work day cases Severity is defined as the average number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case. 3.7 Individual country performance The safety performance reported by participating OGP member companies of individual countries is presented in terms of the lost time injury frequency of companies jointly with contractors. To preserve the anonymity of companies, performance is only published for those countries for which at least 2 companies have reported statistics. Countries with less than 5 reported hours worked are excluded, since results for such small populations of hours would be unrepresentative. Overall averages and regional averages include data from all countries regardless of work hours or number of contributing companies. Of the 11 countries from which data have been reported, 29 are excluded by these constraints. The chart of relative LTIF performance for the remaining 81 countries compares the 213 performance with that of 212 and 211. The majority of countries in Africa, Asia/Australasia, FSU, Middle East and South & Central achieved an LTIF equal to or lower than the overall average LTIF (.45). The majority of countries in Europe and North show an LTIF higher than the global average. The chart of relative TRIR performance compares the 213 performance with that of 212 and 211 for all 81 countries. TRIR calculations exclude data where medical treatment cases are not reported. The majority of countries in Asia/Australasia, FSU and Middle East achieved a TRIR equal to or lower than the overall average TRIR (1.6). The majority of countries in Africa, Europe, North and South & Central show a TRIR higher than the global average. For comparison, the 5-year rolling average FAR is shown for each of the regions. There appears to be little if any correlation between these values and the regional average LTIF and TRIR values. OGP 3-5

46 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Fig 3.7.1: Total recordable injury rate companies with contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-1] By region 5-year rolling average FAR (.) 213 average TRIR [Data page B-1] 213 Global average TRIR = Africa (2.9) Morocco South africa Kenya Tunisia Mauritania Ivory coast Gabon DR Congo Tanzania Ghana Algeria Cameroun Uganda Mozambique Equatorial Guinea Angola Libya Congo Egypt Nigeria Sudan Madagascar Namibia Asia-Australasia New Zealand Australia Singapore Myanmar Papua New Guinea Thailand Malaysia China India South korea Indonesia Japan Bangladesh Pakistan Vietnam Philippines Brunei Europe Denmark Germany Ireland Croatia Poland Norway Netherlands UK Hungary Italy France Spain Romania Greenland (2.1) (2.2) FSU Ukraine Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Russia Turkmenistan Middle East Iraq Yemen Qatar UAE Turkey Oman Kuwait Iran (1.8) (1.7) 12.5 North Canada USA Mexico (4.1) South & Central Uruguay Guyana Peru Brazil Bolivia Trinidad & tobago Argentina Ecuador Venezuela Colombia Surinam (2.3) (1.6) OGP

47 Safety performance indicators 213 data Fig 3.7.2: Lost time injury frequency companies with contractors per million hours worked [Data page B-11] By region 5-year rolling average FAR (.) 213 average LTIF [Data page B-11] 213 Global average LTIF = One or more fatalities (213) listed in orange Africa Morocco Tunisia Tanzania Algeria DR Congo Kenya Mauritania Ghana Gabon Cameroun Uganda Equatorial Guinea Mozambique Libya Egypt Angola Congo Nigeria South africa Sudan Ivory coast Madagascar Namibia (2.9) Asia-Australasia New Zealand Japan Singapore Myanmar Australia China Malaysia South korea Vietnam India Indonesia Bangladesh Thailand Papua New Guinea Pakistan Brunei Philippines Europe Croatia Germany Norway UK Ireland Italy Netherlands Hungary France Spain Romania Denmark Poland Greenland (2.1) (2.2) FSU Russia Kazakhstan Azerbaijan Turkmenistan Ukraine Middle East Yemen Iraq Qatar UAE Kuwait Oman Turkey Iran (1.7) (1.8) 12.5 North Mexico USA Canada (4.1) 6.98 South & Central (2.3) Uruguay Peru Brazil Venezuela Trinidad & Tobago Ecuador Argentina Bolivia Colombia Guyana Surinam (.45) OGP 3-7

48 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 3.8 Incident triangles by region In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in the form of incident triangles. The ratios have been corrected to account for the absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases. Lost time injuries Fatalities and lost work day cases. Recordable injuries Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases where medical treatment cases are reported for the data set. Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities The number of lost time injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (LTI / fatalities). Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities (recordable injuries/fatalities). Fig 3.8.1: 213 incident triangles Africa Fig 3.8.2: 213 incident triangles Asia/Australasia Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities 213 7:1 23: :1 4: :1 97: :1 41:1 Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities :1 17: :1 11: :1 43:1 21 7:1 31: n/a fatalities= fatality lost time injuries recordable injuries Overall Company Contractor 3-8 OGP

49 Safety performance indicators 213 data Fig 3.8.3: 213 incident triangles Europe Fig 3.8.4: 213 incident triangles FSU Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities :1 113: :1 57: :1 316: :1 39:1 Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities :1 65: :1 18: :1 62: :1 5: Fig 3.8.5: 213 incident triangles Middle East Fig 3.8.6: 213 incident triangles North Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities :1 141: :1 52: :1 45: :1 6:1 Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalitiess :1 116: :1 35: :1 213:1 21 9:1 57: n/a fatalities= Fig 3.8.7: 213 incident triangles South & Central Year Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities :1 72: :1 57: :1 131: :1 175: n/a fatalities= fatality lost time injuries recordable injuries Overall Company Contractor OGP 3-9

50 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 3-1 OGP

51 Safety performance indicators 213 data 4. Results by function In this section the safety performance within different functions performed in the E&P industry is presented. Functions are defined as exploration, drilling, production, construction and unspecified. The category other is no longer in use. See the Glossary of Terms at Appendix E for definitions. 4.1 Fatalities by function The distribution of company and contractor fatal incidents and fatalities between the functions is shown for both 213 and Fatal incidents Fatalities Fatal incidents Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Total Fatalities OGP 4-1

52 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 4.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR) 5-year rolling average The five year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of incidents of the five previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for these years. For example, the five year rolling average for drilling FAR for 213 is calculated by: (Number of fatalities in drilling function ) (Total work hours in drilling ) The number series involved in the calculation is frame shifted along by one each year, e.g. 211 will calculate from , inclusive. % of 213 work hours % of 212 work hours % of 211 work hours % of 21 work hours % of 29 work hours Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Fig 4.2.1: Fatal accident rate 5-year rolling average per 1 million hours worked [Data from B-12] Overall Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified In order to smooth out variability in the annual fatal accident rate values 5-year rolling averages are presented. These should provide a more reliable indicator of performance trends. The percentage of the total work hours reported under each function has been detailed below. See Appendix B for further data. The increase in the 21 Drilling FAR can be attributed to the effect of a fire and explosion offshore in the USA in which 11 individuals lost their lives Note: The function other was replaced by construction for the first time in 26, thus the 29 5-year average figure for construction is not available. 4-2 OGP

53 Safety performance indicators 213 data 4.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) by function 213 TRIR 212 TRIR 211 TRIR 21 TRIR 29 TRIR Fig 4.3.1: Total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data from B-13] Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Overall Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of million hours, 97% of the database (see Appendix A). 1 Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified 4.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) 5-year rolling average by function Fig 4.4.1: Lost time injury frequency5-year rolling average per million hours worked [Data from B-13] Overall Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Note: The function other was replaced by construction for the first time in 26, thus the 29 5-year average figure for construction is not available. OGP 4-3

54 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 4.5 Severity of lost work day cases by function Fig 4.5.1: Severity of LWDC average lost days per LWDC [Data from B-13] Average Average 43. The overall average number of days lost per lost work day case (LWDC) is 43. in 213 (4.7 in 212). Offshore the LWDC severity is 51.2 days lost per LWDC compared with 35.8 days for onshore activities (46. and 36.8 respectively for 212). See Section 2.8 for additional information and Section 3.6 for LWDC severity by region Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified 4-4 OGP

55 Safety performance indicators 213 data 4.6 Exploration performance Exploration total recordable injury rate The figures show the TRIR for companies and contractors for exploration related activities, in different regions of the world. 88 million work hours (92% of reported exploration work hours) were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 22% and contractor activities represent 78%. This is an increase of 6 million work hours compared with 212 (82 million work hours in 212; 27% company, 73% contractor). In 213 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in exploration activities are.46 and 2.27 respectively; the overall average TRIR for exploration activities is The total recordable injury rates for companies operating in the FSU and South & Central show a strong increase, this is against a relatively small number of work hours (.3 million and.8 million work hours respectively). Fig : Total recordable injury rate exploration per million hours worked [Data from B-14] 6 Company 213 Contractor Company Contractor Company 213 Average.46 Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Exploration Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, construction, maintenance, materials supply and transportation of personnel and equipment; excludes drilling OGP 4-5

56 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Exploration lost time injury frequency The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors for exploration related activities, in different regions of the world. The 213 result is compared with average LTIF results in the previous 5-year period. 95 million work hours (1% of reported exploration work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 24% and contractor activities represent 76%. This is an increase of 1 million work hours compared with 212 (27% company, 73% contractor in 212). In 213 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in exploration activities are.9 and.95 respectively; the overall average LTIF for exploration activities is.74. Company LTIF values associated with exploration show a reduction in LTIF in all regions compared with the previous 5-year average. Note: In many instances where the LTIF or TRIR is reported as., the number of work hours reported for the specific function and region are relatively low. A detailed breakdown of the hours by region and function is presented in Appendix B. Fig : Lost time injury frequency exploration per million hours worked [Data from B-14] 6 Company 213 Contractor Company Contractor Company 213 Average.9 Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central 4-6 OGP

57 Safety performance indicators 213 data 4.7 Drilling performance Drilling total recordable injury rate The figures show the TRIR for companies and contractors for drilling related activities in different regions of the world. 553 million work hours (95% of reported drilling work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 12% and contractor activities represent 88%. This represents a decrease of 11 million work hours compared with 212, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (13% to 87% respectively). In 213 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities are 1.17 and 3.29 respectively; the overall TRIR for drilling activities is 3.5. Fig : Total recordable injury rate drilling per million hours worked [Data from B-14] 6 Company 213 Contractor 213 Contractor 213 Average Company Contractor Company 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Drilling All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover as well as their administrative, engineering, construction, materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL exploration, appraisal and production drilling. OGP 4-7

58 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Drilling lost time injury frequency 58 million work hours (1% of reported drilling work hours) were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 13% and contractor activities represent 87%. This represents a reduction of 93 million work hours compared with 212, with the same ratio of company to contractor activities. The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors in drilling related activities in different regions of the world. In 213 the overall LTIF for both companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities is.94. In 213 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities are.96 and.93 respectively. Fig : Lost time injury frequency drilling per million hours worked [Data from B-14] 6 Company 213 Contractor Company Contractor Company 213 Average.96 Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central 4-8 OGP

59 Safety performance indicators 213 data 4.8 Production performance Production total recordable injury rate The figures show the TRIR for companies and contractors for production related activities in different regions of the world million work hours (97% of reported production work hours) were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 27% and contractor activities represent 73%. This represents an increase of 34 million work hours compared with 212, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (27% to 73% respectively). In 213 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in production activities are 1.39 and 1.88 respectively; the overall average TRIR for production activities is Fig : Total recordable injury rate production per million hours worked [Data from B-15] 6 6 Company 213 Contractor 213 Company Company 213 Average 1.39 Contractor Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Production Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream production operations including wireline. It does not cover production drilling and workover. See the Appendix E: Glossary of Terms for details OGP 4-9

60 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Production lost time injury frequency The figures show the LTIF for companies and contractors for production related activities in different regions of the world million work hours (1% of reported production work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 27% and contractor activities represent 73%. This is an increase of 93 million work hours over 212, with the same ratio of company to contractor activities. In 213 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in production activities are.55 and.52 respectively; the overall average LTIF for production activities is.53. Fig : Lost time injury frequency production per million hours worked [Data from B-15] 6 Company 213 Contractor Company Contractor Company 213 Average.55 Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central 4-1 OGP

61 Safety performance indicators 213 data 4.9 Construction performance The company and contractor results for 213 construction performance are presented below. Construction activities are predominately conducted by contractors therefore the work hours reported for contractors are much greater than those reported for company employees. Refer to Appendix B for detailed information Company total recordable injury rate 923 million work hours (99% of reported construction work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 8% and contractor activities represent 92%. This represents an increase of 16 million work hours compared with 212, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (6% to 94% respectively). In 213 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in construction activities are.35 and 1.19 respectively; the overall average TRIR for construction activities is Fig : Total recordable injury rate construction per million hours worked [Data from B-15] 6 Company 213 Contractor Company Contractor Company 213 Average.35 Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Construction All major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and removal of redundant process facilities. OGP 4-11

62 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Construction lost time injury frequency 93 million work hours (1% of reported construction work hours) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 8% and contractor activities represent 92%. This represents an increase of 19 million work hours compared with 212, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (6% to 94% respectively). In 213 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in construction activities are.3 and.22 respectively; the overall average LTIF for construction activities is.21. Fig : Lost time injury frequency construction per million hours worked [Data from B-15] 6 Company 213 Contractor Company Contractor Company 213 Average.3 Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central 4-12 OGP

63 Safety performance indicators 213 data 4.1 Unspecifed performance Unspecified total recordable injury rate 822 million work hours (97% of work hours reported as unspecified) were used in this analysis, of which company activities represent 33% and contractor activities represent 67%. This represents an increase of 33 million work hours compared with 212, with a similar ratio company to contractor activities (32% to 68% respectively in 212). In 213 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in activities where the work function was not specified are.53 and 1.8 respectively; the overall average TRIR for unspecified activities is.9. Fig : Total recordable injury rate unspecified per million hours worked [Data from B-16] 6 Company 213 Contractor Company Contractor Company 213 Average.53 Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Unspecified Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel who s work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. OGP 4-13

64 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Unspecified lost time injury frequency 852 million work hours (1% of work hours reported as unspecified) were used in this analysis of which company activities represent 34% and contractor activities represent 66%. This represents an increase of 5 million work hours over 212, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (32% to 68% respectively). In 213 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in activities where the work function was not specified are.2 and.26 respectively; the overall average LTIF for unspecified activities is.24. Reported under the unspecified function in 213 were: 5 company and 6 contractor fatalities 53 company and 141 contractor lost work day cases Reported under the unspecified function from 28 to 212 were: 39 company and 83 contractor fatalities 42 company and 16 contractor lost work day cases Fig : Lost time injury frequency unspecified per million hours worked [Data from B-16] 6 Company 213 Contractor Company Contractor Company 213 Average.2 Contractor 213 Average Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central 4-14 OGP

65 Safety performance indicators 213 data 5. Results by company This section compares the safety performance of individual companies with each other and with their performance in previous years. 5.1 Overall company results For reasons of anonymity each of the 5 companies that has contributed relevant data and is to be included in this analysis has been allocated a unique code letter (A to XX). These codes change every year in line with LTIF performance. All companies reported both company and contractor data. One company did not report medical treatment cases so their data could not be included in the TRIR analysis. Results for all of the 5 participating companies are therefore shown in this section Fatal accident rate by company In 213 OGP member companies reported 65 contractor and 15 company employee fatalities. In the figure below the FAR is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 5 million hours worked. 2 companies met this criterion in 213, compared with the same number in 212. Companies are shown in rank order of company-with-contractor FAR. 8 of the 2 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for companies with contractors reporting more than 5 million hours worked (.98). The range in 213 was between. and 4.94 fatalities per 1 million hours worked. 15 of the 2 companies suffered one or more fatalities. Fig : Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors, joint hours >5 million fatal accident rate per 1 million hours worked [Data page B-17] 6 Company with contractors Top quartile Average companies with contractors.98 W E JJ J EE UU DD S QQ KK FF Z Y LL L II OO RR TT VV OGP 5-1

66 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Total recordable injury rate by company The TRIR for companies together with their contractors is presented below. Data are only included where Medical Treatment Cases (MTC) are reported. One company did not report MTC therefore 49 of the 5 participating companies qualified for inclusion. The TRIR for company alone is plotted alongside the TRIR for company and contractors jointly. The incidence of a fatality in either company or contractor operations is also indicated*. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B. 18 of the 49 companies presented below suffered one or more company or contractor fatality, of which 16 companies suffered one or more contractor fatality. In 6 instances, contractors achieved a lower TRIR than the companies they were employed by. Fig : Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors combined total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 6 Company only Company with contractors Top quartile * Fatality in Average companies with contractors B X E C D J Q H M I O L F K GG N BB G R U AA T V CC Z HH S DD LL EE KK Y XX NN FF OO MM UU P V V SS II RR W TT PP JJ QQWW 5-2 OGP

67 Safety performance indicators 213 data In the figure below the TRIR for contractors alone is plotted alongside the TRIR for company and contractors jointly. One company did not report MTC for its contractors and so is excluded from the graph which reduces the number of companies shown to 48 of the 5. Fig : Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors combined total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 1 Contractor only Company with contractors Top quartile 9 * Fatality in Average companies with contractors B X E C D J Q H M I O L F GG N BB G R U AA T V CC Z HH S DD LL EE KK Y XX NN FF OO MM UU P V V SS II RR W TT PP JJ QQWW OGP 5-3

68 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers In the figures below the TRIR is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 5 million hours worked. 2 companies met this criterion in 213, compared with the same number in 212. Companies are shown in rank order of the company-with-contractor TRIR for companies alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR and for contractors alone vs. company-withcontractor TRIR. 14 of the 2 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for companies with contractors reporting more than 5 million hours worked (1.56). The range for companies jointly with contractors in 213 was between.27 and 4.18 injuries per million hours worked. The range for companies only was between.84 and 2.7. The range for contractors only was between.22 and of the 2 companies suffered one or more company or contractor fatality, of which 12 companies suffered one or more contractor fatality. Fig : Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors combined, joint hours >5 million total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 4.5 Company only Company with contractors Top quartile 4. * Fatality in Average companies with contractors E J L Z S DD LL EE KK Y FF OO UU V V II RR W TT JJ QQ Fig : Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors combined, joint hours >5 million total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 6 Contractor only Company with contractors * Fatality in 213 Top quartile Average companies with contractors E J L Z S DD LL EE KK Y FF OO UU V V II RR W TT JJ QQ 5-4 OGP

69 Safety performance indicators 213 data The remaining 28 companies which, with their contractors, reported less than 5 million hours worked are presented below in rank order of the company-with-contractor TRIR for companies alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR and for contractors alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR. 21 of the 28 companies with their contractors performed above the overall average for smaller companies with contractors (1.67). The range for companies jointly with contractors in 213 was between. and 5.29 injuries per million hours worked. The range for companies only was between. and The range for contractors only was between. and of the 28 smaller companies suffered one or more company or contractor fatality, all of which suffered one or more contractor fatality. Fig : Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors combined, joint hours <5 million total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 6 Company only * Fatality in 213 Top quartile Company with contractors Average companies with contractors B X C D Q H M I O F N GG BB G R U AA T V CC HH XX NN MM P SS PP WW Fig : Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors combined, joint hours <5 million total recordable injury rate per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 1 Contractor only Company with contractors Top quartile 9 * Fatality in Average companies with contractors B X C D Q H M I O F N GG BB G R U AA T V CC HH XX NN MM P SS PP WW OGP 5-5

70 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Lost time injury frequency The figure shows the LTIF in rank order for companies together with their contractors. All of the 5 participating companies (A to WW) contributed both company and contractor data, although not always for every country in which operations were conducted. 38 companies with their contractors delivered a LTIF of less than of the 5 companies presented below suffered one or more fatality. In 6 instances, contractors achieved a lower LTIF than the companies they were employed by. The LTIF for the company alone and contractors alone is plotted alongside the LTIF for company and contractors jointly. The incidence of a fatality in either company or contractor operations is also indicated*. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B. Fig : Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors combined lost time injury frequency per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 3.5 Company only Company with contractors Top quartile 3. * Fatality in Average companies with contractors A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU V V WW XX Fig : Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors combined lost time injury frequency per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 7 Contractor only Company with contractors Top quartile 6 * Fatality in Average companies with contractors.45 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VVWW XX 5-6 OGP

71 Safety performance indicators 213 data In the figures below the LTIF is presented for those companies that, with their contractors, reported more than 5 million hours worked. 2 companies met this criterion in 213, compared with the same number in 212. Companies are shown in rank order of the company-with-contractor LTIF. 13 of the 2 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for companies with contractors reporting more than 5 million hours worked (.38). The range for companies jointly with their contractors in 213 was between.3 and 1.51 lost time injuries per million hours worked. The range for companies only was between.13 and The range for contractors only was between.3 and of the 2 companies suffered one or more fatalities. Fig : Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors combined, joint hours>5 million lost time injury frequency per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 2. Company only Company with contractors Top quartile 1.8 * Fatality in Average companies with contractors E J L S W Y Z DD EE FF II JJ KK LL OO QQ RR TT UU V V Fig : Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors combined, joint hours>5 million lost time injury frequency per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 2. Contractor only Company with contractors Top quartile 1.8 * Fatality in Average companies with contractors E J L S W Y Z DD EE FF II JJ KK LL OO QQ RR TT UU V V OGP 5-7

72 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers The remaining 3 companies which, with their contractors, reported less than 5 million hours worked are presented below in rank order of the company-with-contractor LTIF. 16 of the 3 companies with their contractors performed below the overall average for smaller companies with contractors (.71). The range for companies jointly with contractors in 213 was between. and 3.16 lost time injuries per million hours worked. The range for companies only was between. and The range for contractors only was between. and of the 29 smaller companies presented below suffered one or more fatalities. Fig : Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors combined, joint hours 5 million lost time injury frequency per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 3.5 Company only Company with contractors Top quartile 3. * Fatality in Average companies with contractors A B C D F G H I K M N O P Q R T U V X AA BB CC GG HH MM NN PP SS WW XX Fig : Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors combined, joint hours 5 million lost time injury frequency per million hours worked [Data page B-17] 7 Contractor only Company with contractors Top quartile 6 * Fatality in Average companies with contractors.71 A B C D E F G H I K M N O P Q R T U V X AA BB CC GG HH MM NN PP SS WW XX 5-8 OGP

73 Safety performance indicators 213 data 5.2 Company results by function Results of companies together with their contractors have been analysed by function to allow more in-depth benchmarking between companies. The TRIR indicator has been selected, and the ranked results are shown in the following charts. Only companies that provided data by function are included, and then only those companies that reported more than 1, hours worked. Results against smaller numbers of hours would not have statistical significance. The company code letters are the same as used elsewhere in this section. Exploration was the only function where the top quartile company with contractors shows a TRIR of zero. It is also the function with the smallest number of work hours reported (2% of the total in 213, see Appendix A). Fig 5.2.1: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors Total recordable injury rate exploration per million hours worked [Data page B-18] 12 Company with contractors Top quartile Overall 1.87 (all companies with contractors) L J CC F R T X EE GG Z Q N LL S E FF QQ MM UU TT NN W II AA B BB H I JJ K M O OO P RR V XX Fig 5.2.2: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors Total recordable injury rate drilling per million hours worked [Data page B-18] 12 Company with contractors Top quartile Overall 3.5 (all companies with contractors) 2 W B G O E N U H Q F C J T L K I V Y S GG R LL NN RR DD X HH Z CC FF VV II XX EE M AA TT OO UU QQ BB JJ P OGP 5-9

74 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Fig 5.2.3: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors Total recordable injury rate production per million hours worked [Data page B-18] 12 Company with contractors Top quartile Overall 1.75 (all companies with contractors) X Q M AA O E BB J G CC C L I Y GG R U F LL V K OO N EE P DD Z S FF MM HH UU NN PP RR II VV TT QQ SS JJ W T WW Fig 5.2.4: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors Total recordable injury rate construction per million hours worked [Data page B-18] 12 Company with contractors Top quartile Overall 1.13 (all companies with contractors) C U BB I AA F N V GG J O P G E Z T CC DD NN EE UU HH LL VV S II FF TT Y OO RR W QQ JJ M PP Q X 5-1 OGP

75 Safety performance indicators 213 data Appendix A Database dimensions Fig A-1: Work hours reported millions [Data page B-19] work hours contractor 1 5 work hours company The database for the year 213 covers hours worked in the exploration and production sector of the oil and gas industry. The database is 2% larger than it was in % of the hours reported were associated with onshore activities, 27% with offshore activities. 11 countries are represented in the database, 3 more than in the 212 database. Countries are listed in Appendix D. 5 companies contributed data, of which 49 companies contributed contractor statistics, though not in every case for each country of operation. Of the 5 companies, 47 had contributed data in 212 which accounted for 95% of the database in 212 and 96% of the database in of the companies submitting 213 data had also provided data in of the companies contributed 9% of the hours. 7 companies between them covered 51% of the hours, and the largest contributor accounted for 12%. 22% of the reported work hours were related to company personnel and 78% were related to contractors. Work hours reported ( s) Onshore Offshore Overall Company (16.9%) (4.9%) Contractor (56.3%) (21.9%) Overall A summary of the key elements of the database is shown in the table at the end of this section. OGP A-1

76 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Fig A-2: Exposure hours by region, 213 [Data page B-19] Fig A-3: Exposure hours by region, 212 [Data page B-19] FSU 6% Asia/Australasia 24% FSU 1% Asia/Australasia 2% South & Central 1% South & Central 1% Europe 11% Middle East 17% Europe 11% Middle East 18% North 16% Africa 16% North 15% Africa 16% Fig A-4: Exposure hours by function, 213 [Data page B-19] Fig A-5: Exposure hours by function, 212 [Data page B-19] Exploration 2% Production 35% Exploration 2% Production 33% Drilling 15% Drilling 18% Unspecified 23% Unspecified 22% Construction 25% Construction 25% Unspecified (as a work function) is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. All other data that are not separated out by function are reported as unspecified. A-2 OGP

77 Safety performance indicators 213 data Proportion of database used in analysis For calculations of FAR, fatal incidents per 1 million work hours, and LTIF: All hours in the database were used. For calculations of TRIR: Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3665 million hours, 97% of the database. In 212, the TRIR database was 3651 million hours, 99% of the total database. The region where the smallest proportion of the database could be used was North (92%). For calculations of lost work day severity: Submissions without information on days off work were filtered out, leaving a database of 2625 million hours, 7% of the total database. In 211, this database was 2876 million hours, 78% of the total database. North and Europe have only 37% and 57% severity information respectively, whereas 94% of the South & Central database was useable. For calculations of restricted work day severity: Submissions without information on days assigned to restricted activities were filtered out, leaving a database of 288 million hours, 55% of the total database. In 212 this database was 2183 million hours, 59% of the total database. More detailed information is shown in the tables below. Percent. of useable data regions TRIR analyses Lost work day case severity analyses Africa 99% 85% 64% Asia/ Australasia 96% 67% 56% Europe 99% 58% 42% FSU 1% 77% 62% Middle East 98% 76% 51% North 92% 38% 34% South & Central 1% 96% 89% Restricted work day case severity analyses Percent. of useable data functions TRIR analyses Lost work day case severity analyses Exploration 93% 75% 6% Drilling 95% 74% 6% Production 97% 7% 58% Construction 99% 64% 49% Restricted work day case severity analyses Percent. of useable data overall TRIR analyses Lost work day case severity analyses 97% 7% 55% Restricted work day case severity analyses OGP A-3

78 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers A-4 OGP

79 Safety performance indicators 213 data Appendix B Data tables Summary of 213 data Hours worked ( s) No. fatalities No. LWDCs No. RWDCs No. MTCs FAR LTIF TRIR Africa Company Onshore Company Offshore Contractor Onshore Contractor Offshore Sub Total Asia/Australasia Company Onshore Company Offshore Contractor Onshore Contractor Offshore Sub Total Europe Company Onshore Company Offshore Contractor Onshore Contractor Offshore Sub Total FSU Company Onshore Company Offshore Contractor Onshore Contractor Offshore Sub Total Middle East Company Onshore Company Offshore Contractor Onshore Contractor Offshore Sub Total North Company Onshore South & Central Company Offshore Contractor Onshore Contractor Offshore Sub Total Company Onshore Company Offshore Contractor Onshore Contractor Offshore Sub Total Total Company Onshore Company Offshore Contractor Onshore Contractor Offshore Grand Total OGP B-1

80 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers The following data are presented in relation to the sections of the report where the data have been used. Section 1 Summary Section 1 Summary intentionally excluded Section 2 Overall results Total recordable injury rate Year Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore Hours 213 ( s) Fatal accident rate Year Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore Hours 213 ( s) Fatal incidents per 1 million work hours Year Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore Hours 213 ( s) B-2 OGP

81 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost time injury frequency Year Onshore Offshore Overall Company Contractor Hours 213 ( s) Fatalities by category, 213 Category No. % Assault or violent act Caught in, under or between Confined space N/A Cut, puncture, scrape N/A Explosions or burns 4 5. Exposure electrical Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release Slips and rrips (at same height) N/A Struck by Fatalities by activity, 213 Activity No. % Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV N/A Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering N/A Production operations Seismic/survey operations Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Water related, drowning Other Fatalities by category, 213 Cause Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore Assault or violent act Caught in, under or between Confined space Cut, puncture, scrape Explosions or burns Exposure electrical Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning Other OGP B-3

82 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Fatalities by activity, 213 Activity Company Contractors Overall Onshore Offshore Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Lost work day cases by category, 213 Category Number % Assault or violent act 1.6 Caught in, under or between Confined space 4.2 Cut, puncture, scrape Explosions or burns Exposure electrical 14.9 Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release 11.7 Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Lost work day cases by activity, 213 Activity Number % Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV 9.6 Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations 14.9 Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Water related, drowning Other B-4 OGP

83 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost work day cases by category, 213 Category Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore Assault or violent act Caught in, under or between Confined space Cut, puncture, scrape Explosions or burns Exposure electrical Exposure noise, pressure, chemical, biological, vibration Falls from height Overexertion, strain Pressure release Slips and trips (at same height) Struck by Water related, drowning Other Lost work day cases by activity, 213 Activity Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore Construction, commissioning, decommissioning Diving, subsea, ROV Drilling, workover, well services Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations Maintenance, inspection, testing Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering Production operations Seismic/survey operations Transport air Transport land Transport water, including marine activity Unspecified other Lost work day case severity Year Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore Hours 213 ( s) OGP B-5

84 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Restricted work day case severity Year Company Contractor Overall Onshore Offshore Hours 213 ( s) Life Saving Rules Rule Fatal incidents Core rule? Dropped objects 1 No Gas test 1 No Journey management 1 Yes Overhead power lines 1 No Suspended load 1 Yes Seat belt 2 Yes Work at height 3 Yes Flotation device 5 No Line of fire - safe area 14 No No appropriate rule 8 n/a Insufficient information to assign a rule 6 n/a B-6 OGP

85 Safety performance indicators 213 data Section 3 Results by region Fatalities Region Fatalities 213 (212) FAR 213 (212) Fatal incidents 213 (212) Africa 27 (17) 4.53 (2.83) 9 (13) Asia/Australasia 8 (1).87 (1.35) 7 (1) Europe 9 (2) 2.26 (.52) 5 (2) FSU 3 (2) 1.25 (.55) 3 (2) Middle East 4 (13).63 (1.95) 4 (11) North 12 (42) 2.3 (7.5) 1 (12) South & Central 17 (2) 4.37 (.54) 5 (2) Fatal accident rate Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Total recordable injury rate Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Ave Hours Lost time injury frequency Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Ave Hours OGP B-7

86 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Hours worked ( s) Year Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages Fatal accident rate 5-year rolling average Year Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions B-8 OGP

87 Safety performance indicators 213 data Total recordable injury rate 5-year rolling average Year Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Lost time injury frequency 5-year rolling average Year Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Severity of lost work day cases Year Africa Asia/ Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Ave Hours OGP B-9

88 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Total recordable injury rate by country Region Country TRIR One or more fatalities in 213 Africa Morocco no South Africa no Kenya no Tunisia no Mauritania no Ivory coast no Gabon yes Congo - Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) no Tanzania yes Ghana no Algeria yes Cameroun yes Uganda no Mozambique no Equatorial Guinea no Angola yes Africa average 1.5 Libya no Congo no Egypt no Nigeria yes Sudan... no Madagascar no Namibia. n/a. no Region Country TRIR One or more fatalities in 213 Norway no Netherlands yes Europe average 2.58 UK yes Hungary no Italy no France no Spain no Romania yes Greenland no FSU Ukraine no Azerbaijan no FSU average.81 Kazakhstan no Russia yes Turkmenistan no Middle East Iraq no Yemen no Qatar yes UAE no Middle East average.9 Turkey no Oman no Kuwait yes Iran no Asia/ Australasia New Zealand no Australia no Singapore no Myanmar yes Asia-Australasia average.97 Papua New Guinea yes Thailand no Malaysia yes China yes India no South Korea no Indonesia no Japan no Bangladesh no Pakistan no Vietnam no Philippines no Brunei no North South & Central Canada yes North average 2.58 USA yes Mexico no Uruguay n/a yes Guyana no Peru yes Brazil yes South & Central average 3.13 Bolivia no Trinidad & Tobago no Argentina no Ecuador no Venezuela no Colombia no Surinam no Europe Denmark no Germany no Ireland yes Croatia no Poland no B-1 OGP

89 Safety performance indicators 213 data Lost time injury frequency by country Region Country LTIF One or more fatalities in 213 Africa Morocco no Tunisia no Tanzania yes Algeria yes Congo - Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) no Kenya no Mauritania no Ghana no Gabon yes Cameroun yes Uganda no Equatorial Guinea no Mozambique no Libya no Africa average.31 Egypt no Angola yes Congo no Nigeria yes South Africa... no Sudan... no Ivory coast no Madagascar... no Namibia... no Asia/ Australasia New Zealand no Japan no Singapore.35.. no Myanmar yes Australia no China yes Malaysia yes South Korea no Vietnam no India no Asia-Australasia average.15 Indonesia yes Bangladesh.7.. no Thailand no Papua New Guinea yes Pakistan yes Brunei... no Philippines no Region Country LTIF One or more fatalities in 213 Italy no Netherlands yes Hungary no France no Spain no Romania yes Denmark no Poland no Greenland no FSU Russia yes FSU average.33 Kazakhstan no Azerbaijan no Turkmenistan no Ukraine no Middle East North South & Central Yemen no Iraq no Qatar yes Middle East average.21 UAE no Kuwait yes Oman... no Turkey no Iran... no Mexico yes North average.74 USA yes Canada yes Uruguay n/a yes Peru yes Brazil yes South & Central average.85 Venezuela no Trinidad & Tobago no Ecuador no Argentina no Bolivia no Colombia no Guyana... no Surinam... no Europe Croatia no Germany no Norway no UK yes Ireland yes Europe average 1.2 OGP B-11

90 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Section 4 Results by function Fatal incidents and fatalities by function ( s) Fatal incidents Fatalities Fatal incidents Fatalities Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified All functions Exposure hours by function ( s) Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified All functions Fatal accident rate 5-year rolling average Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Overall Note: the method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 21 data. Historic figures presented above have been recalculated accordingly. Fatal accident rate Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Note: the method of calculating FAR on a functional basis has changed with the publication of 21 data to use the incident function instead of the function of the victim.historic figures presented above have been recalculated acordingly. B-12 OGP

91 Safety performance indicators 213 data Total recordable injury rate Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Overall Ave Hours 213 ( s) Lost time injury frequency 5-year rolling average Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Overall Note: the method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 21 data. Historic figures presented above have been recalculated accordingly. Lost time injury frequency Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Other Unspecified Overall Hours 213 ( s) Severity of lost work day cases Year Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified Overall Ave Hours 213 ( s) OGP B-13

92 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Exploration TRIR for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Exploration LTIF for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Drilling TRIR for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Drilling LTIF for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions B-14 OGP

93 Safety performance indicators 213 data Production TRIR for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Production LTIF for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Construction TRIR for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Construction LTIF for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions OGP B-15

94 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Unspecified TRIR for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Unspecified LTIF for company & contractor by region Company Contractor Company work hours ( s) Contractor work hours ( s) Region Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions B-16 OGP

95 Safety performance indicators 213 data Section 5 Results by company Company code Company & Contractor FAR Company & Contractor TRIR Company only TRIR Contractor only TRIR Company & Contractor LTIF Company only LTIF Contractor only LTIF A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z OVERALL AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VV WW XX OGP B-17

96 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Total recordable injury rate by function Exploration Drilling Production Construction Company code Company & Contractor Company code Company & Contractor Company code Company & Contractor Company code Company & Contractor L 1.98 W X 9.45 C J 7.47 B Q 8.5 U CC 6.65 G 8.95 M 5.53 BB 1.1 F 5.75 O 8.34 AA 5.41 I 8.51 R 5.62 E 8.1 O 5.17 AA 5.56 T 5.1 N 7.61 E 4.34 F 4.87 X 3.53 U 7.9 BB 3.94 N 4.55 EE 3.4 H 6.74 J 3.88 V 4.23 GG 2.98 Q 6.23 G 3.63 GG 3.57 Z 2.78 F 6.17 CC 3.42 J 3.7 Q 2.53 C 6.4 C 3.21 O 2.96 N 2.39 J 5.64 L 2.88 P 2.86 Overall 1.87 T 5.6 I 2.73 G 2.76 LL 1.84 L 4.72 Y 2.55 E 2.5 S 1.8 K 4.7 GG 2.49 Z 2.5 E 1.76 I 4.69 R 2.41 T 2.8 FF 1.37 V 4.23 U 2.35 CC 1.88 QQ 1.27 Y 3.89 F 2.32 DD 1.66 MM.81 S 3.74 LL 2.17 NN 1.46 UU.52 GG 3.53 V 2.6 EE 1.42 TT.47 R 3.2 K 2. UU 1.41 NN.4 LL 3.19 OO 1.91 Overall 1.13 W.27 NN 3.11 Overall 1.75 HH.89 II.23 Overall 3.5 N 1.73 LL.86 AA. RR 3.1 EE 1.6 VV.84 B. DD 2.99 P 1.43 S.79 BB. X 2.87 DD 1.31 II.76 H. HH 2.64 Z 1. FF.66 I. Z 2.53 S.99 TT.59 JJ. CC 2.44 FF.97 Y.56 K. FF 2.28 MM.89 OO.54 M. VV 1.99 HH.84 RR.33 O. II 1.87 UU.82 W.23 OO. XX 1.85 NN.73 QQ.5 P. EE 1.84 PP.58 JJ. RR. M 1.63 RR.57 M. V. AA 1.39 II.53 PP. XX. TT 1.3 VV.44 Q. OO 1.26 TT.42 X. UU.97 QQ.41 QQ.89 SS.4 BB.78 JJ.35 JJ.64 W.24 P. T. WW. B-18 OGP

97 Safety performance indicators 213 data Database dimensions (Appendix A) Total exposure hours Hours worked (millions) Year Overall Company Contractor Exposure hours by region ( s) Africa Asia/Australasia Europe FSU Middle East North South & Central All regions Exposure hours by function ( s) Exploration Drilling Production Construction Unspecified All functions OGP B-19

98 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers B-2 OGP

99 Safety performance indicators 213 data Appendix C Contributing companies The table below shows the size of the database in thousands of hours worked for each contributing company and whether reported data include information on contractor statistics, breakdown by function, medical treatment cases, restricted work day cases, days lost following lost work day and restricted work day cases. All company submissions include data on numbers of fatalities and lost work day cases. COMPANY Hours ( s) Contractor data Data by function RWDCs LWDC days RWDC days Addax Petroleum Limited yes yes yes yes yes ADNOC yes yes yes yes yes Anadarko yes yes yes partly partly Bashneft yes yes yes yes yes BG Group yes yes yes yes yes BHP 1 96 yes yes yes yes yes BP yes yes mostly no no Cairn Energy 756 yes yes yes yes yes Cairn India yes yes yes yes yes Chevron yes yes mostly mostly mostly CNOOC yes yes partly partly partly ConocoPhillips yes no yes no no Dolphin Energy yes yes yes yes yes Dong E&P yes yes yes yes yes E.ON yes yes mostly no no Eni yes yes yes yes no ExxonMobil yes yes yes no no Galp 265 yes yes yes yes yes GDF Suez E&P International 7231 yes no yes yes partly Hess Corporation yes yes yes yes yes Inpex 6293 yes yes yes yes yes Kosmos 1731 yes yes yes yes yes Kuwait Oil Company yes yes yes yes no Maersk Oil yes yes yes no no Marathon Oil Company yes yes yes no no MOL yes yes no partly no Nexen Inc yes yes yes yes no Oil Search yes yes yes yes mostly OMV yes yes yes yes yes Pan n Energy yes yes yes yes no Pemex yes yes partly partly partly Perenco yes yes yes yes yes Petrobras yes yes yes yes yes Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd yes yes yes no no Premier Oil yes yes mostly no no PTTEP yes yes yes yes yes Qatar Petroleum yes yes mostly mostly mostly Rasgas yes yes yes no no Repsol yes yes yes yes mostly RWE DEA AG 4841 yes yes yes yes no Sasol 5357 yes yes no yes no Shell Companies yes yes mostly mostly mostly Statoil yes yes yes no no Suncor 4662 yes yes yes yes yes Talisman Energy yes yes partly no no Total yes yes yes yes yes Tullow Oil yes yes yes yes yes Wintershall 8397 yes yes yes yes yes Woodside yes yes yes yes yes Yemen LNG 8654 yes yes yes yes yes Note: a data row is a single entry for a company for one country and location (one of company onshore, company offshore, contractor onshore, contractor offshore), e.g. Acompany, UK, company offshore. OGP yes = reported for all data rows mostly = reported for more than 5% of data rows partly = reported for less than 5% of data rows no - not reported at all C-1

100 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers C-2 OGP

101 Appendix D Countries represented Safety performance indicators 213 data The tabulation shows the breakdown of reported hours worked in regions and countries. Also shown is the number of companies reporting data in each country. The table does not necessarily show all hours worked in the exploration & production sectors of the oil & gas industry in each country. No. reporting Hours Country companies ( s) Africa Algeria Angola Benin Botswana 1 26 Cameroun Chad Congo Congo (Democratic Republic of) Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Gabon Ghana Ivory Coast Kenya Liberia 3 46 Libya Madagascar 3 62 Mauritiana Morocco Mozambique Namibia 2 82 Nigeria Senegal 2 18 Sierra Leone 2 25 South Africa Sudan 2 79 Tanzania Togo Tunisia Uganda Asia/Australasia Australia Bangladesh Brunei Cambodia 1 22 China India Indonesia Japan Malaysia Myanmar Nepal 1 3 New Zealand Pakistan Papua New Guinea Philippines Singapore South Korea Taiwan 1 9 Thailand Timor Leste 1 6 Vietnam Europe Austria Croatia Cyprus Denmark France Germany No. reporting Hours Country companies ( s) Europe (continued) Greenland 2 73 Hungary Ireland Italy Monaco Netherlands Norway Poland Romania Spain Sweden 1 11 Switzerland UK FSU Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Russia Turkmenistan Ukraine Uzbekistan Middle East Iran Iraq Israel 1 9 Jordan Kuwait Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Syria 2 47 Turkey UAE Yemen North Canada Cuba 1 1 Mexico USA South Argentina Aruba 1 45 Belize Bolivia Brazil Chile 1 76 Colombia Ecuador Falklands Islands 1 4 French Guiana Guatamala Guyana Peru Surinam Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela OGP D-1

102 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers D-2 OGP

103 Safety performance indicators 213 data Appendix E: Glossary of terms Assault and violent act (as an incident/ event category) Intentional attempt, threat or act of bodily injury by a person or person(s) or by violent harmful actions of unknown intent, includes intentional acts of damage to property. Caught in, under or between (as an incident/event category) Injury where injured person is crushed or similarly injured between machinery moving parts or other objects, caught between rolling tubulars or objects being moved, crushed between a ship and a dock, or similar incidents. Also includes vehicle incidents involving a rollover. Causal factors See User Guide, OGP report 213su Company employee Any person employed by and on the payroll of the reporting Company, including corporate and management personnel specifically involved in E&P. Persons employed under shortservice contracts are included as Company employees provided they are paid directly by the Company. Confined space (as an incident/ event category) Spaces that are considered confined because their configurations hinder the activities of employee who must enter, work in, and exit them. Confined spaces include, but are not limited to underground vaults, tanks, storage bins, manholes, pits, silos, process vessels and pipelines. Construction (as a work function) Major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and removal of redundant process facilities. Construction, commissioning, decommissioning (as a type of activity) Activities involving the construction, fabrication and installation of equipment, facilities or plant, testing activities to verify design objectives or specification, and also disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning) at the end of the facility life. Contractor A Contractor is defined as an individual or organisation performing work for the reporting company, following verbal or written agreement. Sub-contractor is synonymous with Contractor. Contractor employee Any person employed by a Contractor or Contractor s Sub- Contractor(s) who is directly involved in execution of prescribed work under a contract with the reporting Company. Cut, puncture, scrape (as an incident/ event category) Abrasions, scratches and wounds that penetrate the skin. Diving operations The personnel, equipment and management systems to support a person who dives. A person Dives if he enters water or any other liquid, or a chamber in which he is subject to pressure greater than 1 millibars above atmospheric pressure: and in order to survive in such an environment he breathes air or other gas at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. Or for such a purpose uses a vehicle, capsule or suit where a sealed internal atmospheric pressure is maintained and where the external pressure differential is greater than 1 millibars. Diving, subsea, ROV (as a type of activity) Operations involving diving (see definition for diving operations), subsea equipment or activities and/or operations involving underwater remotely operated vehicles (ROV). Drilling (as a work function) All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover as well as their administrative, engineering, construction, materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling site upon work completion. Drilling includes ALL exploration, appraisal and production drilling. Drilling/workover/well services (as a type of activity) Activities involving the development, maintenance work or remedial treatments related to an oil or gas well. Event An unplanned or uncontrolled outcome of a business operation or activity that has or could have contributed to an injury, illness, physical or environmental damage. Exploration (as a work function) Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, construction, maintenance, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment; excludes drilling. Explosion or burn (as an incident/event category) Burns or other effects of fires, explosions and extremes of temperature. Explosion means a rapid combustion, not an overpressure. OGP E-1

104 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Exposure: electrical (as an incident/event category) Exposure to electrical shock or electrical burns etc. Exposure: noise, chemical, biological, vibration (as an incident/event category) Exposure to noise, chemical substances (including asphyxiation due to lack of oxygen not associated with a confined space), hazardous biological material, vibration or radiation. Falls from height (as an incident/event category) A person falls from one level to another. Fatal accident rate (FAR) The number of company/contractor fatalities per 1,, (1 million) hours worked. Fatality Cases that involve one or more people who died as a result of a work-related incident or occupational illness. First aid case Cases that are not sufficiently serious to be reported as medical treatment or more serious cases but nevertheless require minor first aid treatment, e.g. dressing on a minor cut, removal of a splinter from a finger. First aid cases are not recordable incidents. High potential event Any incident or near miss that could have realistically resulted in one or more fatalities. Hours worked The actual hours worked, including overtime hours, are recorded in the case of onshore operations. The hours worked by an individual will generally be about 2, per year. For offshore workers, the hours worked are calculated on a 12 hour work day. Consequently, average hours worked per year will vary from 1,6 to 2,3 hours per person depending upon the on/off shift ratio. Vacations and leaves are excluded. Hours worked in year ( s) Hours are rounded to the nearest thousand. Incident An unplanned or uncontrolled Event or chain of Events that has resulted in at least one fatality, recordable injury or illness, or physical or environmental damage. Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations (as a type of activity) Activities related to the use of mechanical lifting and hoisting equipment, assembling and dis-assembling drilling rig equipment and drill pipe handling on the rig floor. Key performance indicators (KPI) In this report, these include: number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, lost time injury frequency, and total recordable injury rate. Lost time injury (LTI) A fatality or lost work day case. The number of LTIs is the sum of fatalities and lost work day cases. Lost time injury frequency (LTIF) The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) incidents per 1,, hours worked. Lost work day case (LWDC) Any work related injury other than a fatal injury which results in a person being unfit for work on any day after the day of occurrence of the occupational injury. Any day includes rest days, weekend days, leave days, public holidays or days after ceasing employment. LWDC severity The average number of lost days per lost work day case. Maintenance, inspection and testing (as a type of activity) Activities related to preserving, repairing, examining and function testing assets, equipment, plant or facilities. Medical cause of death This is the cause of death given on the death certificate. Where two types of causes are provided, such as pulmonary oedema caused by inhalation of hot gases from a fire, both are recorded. Medical treatment case (MTC) Cases that are not severe enough to be reported as fatalities or lost work day cases or restricted work day cases but are more severe than requiring simple first aid treatment. Near miss An unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of events that has not resulted in recordable injury, illness, physical or environmental damage but had the potential to do so in other circumstances. Number of days unfit for work The sum total of calendar days (consecutive or otherwise) after the days of the occupational injuries on which the employees involved were unfit for work and did not work. Number of employees Average number of full-time and part-time employees involved in exploration & production, calculated on a full-time basis, during the reporting year. E-2 OGP

105 Safety performance indicators 213 data Number of fatalities The total number of Company s employees and or Contractor s employees who died as a result of an incident. Delayed deaths that occur after the incident are included if the deaths were a direct result of the incident. For example, if a fire killed one person outright, and a second died three weeks later from lung damage caused by the fire, both are reported. Occupational injury Any injury such as a cut, fracture, sprain, amputation, etc., or any fatality, which results from a work-related activity or from an exposure involving a single incident in the work environment, such as deafness from explosion, one-time chemical exposure, back disorder from a slip / trip, insect or snake bite. Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering (as a type of activity) Activities related to work conducted in offices, warehouses, workshops, accommodation and catering facilities. Offshore work All activities and operations that take place at sea, including activities in bays, in major inland seas such as the Caspian Sea, or in other inland seas directly connected to oceans. Incidents including transportation of people and equipment from shore to the offshore location, either by vessel or helicopter, should be recorded as offshore. Onshore work All activities and operations that take place within a landmass, including those on swamps, rivers and lakes. Land-to-land aircraft operations are counted as onshore, even though flights are over water. Other (as an incident/event category) Used to specify where an incident cannot be logically classed under any other category. In the case of incident activities, includes air transport incidents. Note: the work function Other was replaced by construction for the first time in 26. Overexertion or strain (as an incident/ event category) Physical overexertion e.g. muscle strain Pressure release (as an incident/ event category) Failure of or release of gas, liquid or object from a pressurised system. Process safety event (PSE) A process safety event, which can also be referred to as an asset integrity event, is a Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) and is recordable if: the consequence was a reportable employee or contractor injury or fatality, a third party hospital admission or fatality, a community or site evacuation or a fire / explosion; or a pressure relief device discharge or material release occurs which exceeded defined thresholds (even if none of the consequences above occurred) as specified within OGP report 456, Process safety recommended practice on key performance indicators which provides consequence and threshold definitions consistent with API Recommended Practice No org.uk/pubs/456.pdf, the supplement to this report provides Process Safety Upstream PSE examples pubs/456supp.pdf. Process safety related Process safety related events are those which do not meet the specific criteria to be classified as Tier 1 or 2 Process Safety Events but which have learning potential in the prevention of Process Safety Events. Production (as a work function) Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including their administrative and engineering aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream production operations including wireline. Gas processing activities with the primary intent of producing gas liquids for sale including; work on production wells under pressure oil (including condensates) and gas extraction and separation (primary production) heavy oil production where it is inseparable from upstream (i.e. stream assisted gravity drainage) production primary oil processing (water separation, stabilisation) primary gas processing (dehydration, liquids separation, sweetening, CO 2 removal) Floating Storage Units (FSUs) and sub-sea storage units gas processing activities with the primary intent of producing gas liquids for sale êê secondary liquid separation (i.e. Natural Gas Liquids [NGL] extraction using refrigeration processing) êê Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Gas to Liquids (GTL) operations flow-lines between wells and pipelines between facilities associated with field production operations oil and gas loading facilities including land or marine vessels (trucks and ships) when connected to an oil or gas production process pipeline operations (including booster stations) operated by company E&P business OGP E-3

106 International Association of Oil & Gas Producers Production excludes: production drilling or workover mining processes associated with the extraction of heavy oil tar sands heavy oil when separable from upstream operations secondary heavy oil processing (upgrader) refineries Production operations (as a type of activity) Activities related to the extraction of hydrocarbons from source such as an oil or gas well or hydrocarbon bearing geological structure, including primary processing, storage and transport operations. Includes normal, start-up or shut-down operations. Recordable A type of event, incident, injury, illness, release or other outcome which has been determined to meet or exceed definitions, criteria or thresholds for inclusion and classification in reported data. Restricted work day case (RWDC) Any work-related injury other than a fatality or lost work day case which results in a person being unfit for full performance of the regular job on any day after the occupational injury. Work performed might be: an assignment to a temporary job; part-time work at the regular job; working full-time in the regular job but not performing all the usual duties of the job Where no meaningful restricted work is being performed, the incident is recorded as a lost work day case (LWDC). Seismic/survey operations (as a type of activity) Activities relating to the determination of sub-surface structures for the purpose of locating oil and gas deposits including geophysical and seismic data acquisition. Slips and trips (at the same height) (as an incident/event category) Slips, trips and falls caused by falling over or onto something at the same height. Struck by (as an incident/event category) Incidents/events where injury results from being hit by moving equipment and machinery, or by flying or falling objects. Also includes vehicle incidents where the vehicle is struck by or struck against another object. Third party A person with no business relationship with the company or contractor. Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical treatment cases) per 1,, hours worked. Transport air (as a type of activity) Involving aircraft, either fixed wing or helicopters. Injuries caused by accidents on the ground at airports are classified in one of the other categories. Transport land (as a type of activity) Involving motorised vehicles designed for transporting people and goods over land, e.g. cars, buses, trucks. Pedestrians struck by a vehicle are classified as land transport incidents. Incidents from a mobile crane would only be land transport incidents if the crane were being moved between locations. Transport water, including Marine Activity (as a type of activity) Involving vessels, equipment or boats designed for transporting people and goods over water (including inland, marine, ice roads and marsh/swamp) e.g. supply vessels, crew boats. Unspecified other (as a type of activity) Incidents that cannot be logically classed under other headings or where the activity is unknown. Unspecified (as a work function) Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. All other data that are not sepa rated out by function are reported as unspecified. Water related/drowning (as an incident/ event category) Incidents/events in which water played a significant role including drowning. Work-related injury See occupational injury. E-4 OGP

107 For further information and publications, please visit our website at

108 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NL United Kingdom Telephone: +44 () Fax: +44 () International Association of Oil & Gas Producers 165 Bd du Souverain 4th Floor B-116 Brussels, Belgium Telephone: +32 () Fax: +32 () Internet site: