The Roads to Recovery. Facts About Transportation Funding and Spending
|
|
|
- Michael Mills
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Roads to Recovery Facts About Transportation Funding and Spending
2 How Pima County spends transportation money (F.Y Transportation Budget) 1 Debt Service (1997 bonds): $19.1 million In 1997, county voters approved borrowing $350 million to fund 57 transportation projects over 20 years. The borrowed funds are paid back through annual HURF receipts. 2 Roadway Maintenance: $14.4 million This fund pays for the general maintenance of the county s transportation systems and the majority is divided into the county s six maintenance districts. General maintenance includes pothole repair, crack sealing and overlays, vegetation maintenance and storm response. 3 Traffic Engineering: $6.7 million The fund pays for signs, signals, striping, traffic studies and safety systems. 4 Transit: $6.1 million Nearly all of this fund is used to pay for public transportation services (Sun Tran and Sun Van) in the unincorporated county. The public transportation funding is required under the county s agreement with and participation in the Regional Transportation Authority. 5 Director s Office: $4.8 million This fund is used to pay for the overall administration of the county Transportation Department. It also pays for a variety of transportation-related projects and programs, including: the Summer Student Program; Environmental planning and compliance; Mapping and records; Graffiti abatement; and community relations. 6 Overhead and Insurance: $4.4 million This pays for county administrative and other fixed overhead costs and for the county s self-insurance allocation for general liability. 7 Field Engineering: $1.7 million This fund pays for inspection and compliance services. 8 Engineering and Planning: $1 million This fund pays for planning and design services on county roads, bridges, sidewalks, and bike paths Pavement Preservation: $5 million This fund comes from property taxes transferred to PCDOT by vote of the Board of Supervisors. Pavement preservation is the resurfacing of degraded major arterial roads (as opposed to pothole filling, which is general maintenance). Total: $63.2 million 2 1 Where Pima County s transportation money comes from (F.Y Transportation Budget) 1 HURF: $37.5 million Highway User Revenue Fund. This fund is made up primarily of taxes on motor fuels and vehicle license taxes but also includes revenue from an assortment of other small taxes and fees. The state divides the money up and shares it with municipalities and counties. About 19 percent goes to the counties. 2 VLT : $11.6 million Vehicle License Tax. This is the revenue generated through vehicle registrations. About 44 percent goes into the HURF above and then another 24.6 percent is shared with the counties. 3 Other: $1.8 million Rental income on county property, investment pool interest income, land abandonment, licenses/permits, court ordered restitutions for county property damages and late interest fee on accounts receivable. 4 Fund Balance, Transfers: $7.3 million This line item includes carry overs from the previous fiscal year and transfers from the county General Fund. 5 General Fund Transfer: $5 million The Board of Supervisors voted to transfer property taxes out of the General Fund, which is the general operations fund for the county, to pay for pavement preservation of major arterial roads in the unincorporated county Total: $63.2 million 1
3 The Problem Many County roads are in need of repair. Saying, fix the roads, is easy. Finding the money to fix them is hard. It s important to understand how we got here, where we are now and how we can fund road repair. America s transportation infrastructure is in trouble, suffering from decades of inadequate funding. Arizona roads are no exception. Locally, about 60 percent of Tucson s and unincorporated Pima County s roads are in poor or failed condition. The cost to fix them is more than $1 billion, with about $250 million of that needed in unincorporated Pima County. How did our roads get this way and why isn t there an easy fix? The Facts Declining gas tax purchasing power } Arizona s gas tax is 18 cents per gallon and hasn t been increased since 1991 } Since 1991, inflation has increased by 71 percent } Construction costs have more than doubled } For Arizona s gas tax to have the same purchasing power today as in 1991, it would need to be 33 cents per gallon. Better vehicle MPG } Between 1990 and 2012, passenger vehicle gas mileage improved 46 percent } In 2013, Arizonans drove 71 percent more miles than in 1990 yet they only bought 52 percent more gas; that means more road wear but less revenue per mile driven Legislative road funding sweeps } The state collects gas taxes and other transportation fees statewide and is supposed to share those funds with cities and counties to fund road improvements. } The state Legislature over the past 10 years has swept $1 billion from those funds and used it elsewhere. Sometimes a new road is the best form of road repair } Some roads are scheduled for reconstruction under the county s capital improvement program (CIP), including $62 million in transportation projects budgeted for this fiscal year. } Most road reconstructions are paid for by bond funds or Regional Transportation Authority funds, which cannot be used for annual maintenance. } Some problem roads are on the Regional Transportation Authority projects list, scheduled for reconstruction over the next 10 years. Paying $200,000 for an asphalt overlay on a rough road scheduled to be completely replaced in a few years is a waste of money. County road bond payment } In 1997, Pima County voters approved borrowing $350 million in road expansions and improvements to relieve severe congestion and to accommodate growth, borrowing against future gas tax revenues from the state. } That requires about $19 million a year of our shared transportation revenue be used to pay back the bonds, and those payments will continue until at least 2024 } The borrowed funds must be paid back as promised. Road maintenance is more than just filling potholes } Road maintenance is the general upkeep of the county s transportation systems, including filling potholes. Pavement preservation includes the conservation of roadways, which includes chip sealing and milling. } Most asphalt roads in our dry climate have a normal lifespan of years, with deterioration beginning after five years. A road will get progressively worse if not given routine conservation work such as chip sealing. } In fiscal year 2014, the county spent $21 million on roads maintenance which included filling thousands of potholes, grading dirt roads, clearing sand from wash crossings after storms, striping streets and fixing traffic signals. } The majority of the county s problem roads are in lightly travelled neighborhoods. Because of funding shortfalls, the County has concentrated its major work on heavily used arterials. } For the past three years, the county has been adding $5 million from the general fund to help preserve heavily used arterial roads. } Public safety contributes to spending needs: replacing rough road surfaces doesn t carry the same public safety urgency as clearing mounded sand from a wash crossing after a storm or replacing a burned out bulb in a traffic signal.
4 The answer to fixing our roads is clear: It will take more money It will cost more than $250 million to repair the 1,000 miles of unincorporated county roads that are in poor or failed condition. To fix all of those roads without the problem getting worse will cost $30 million a year for 10 years (which accounts for inflation and other projected cost increases over that span). In addition, we also have to consider our annual bill of $28 million for basic maintenance and preservation costs described on the prior pages. Proposed funding solutions and how they stack up 1. Raise the County s primary property tax and cut the budget Since the start of the recession in 2007, Pima County has reduced its workforce by more than 1,000 employees and its budget by more than $300 million a year. Finding an additional $30 million a year for pavement preservation without more state gas tax revenue would require increasing the County s primary property tax. However, the state limits the percentage tax increase counties can impose each year, so the tax rate can t be raised high enough to generate funds needed to solve this problem. Making up the difference would require cutting or eliminating fundamental services such as law enforcement, parks, health care and human services. 2. Impose a transportation-specific property tax While this sounds easy enough, it won t provide the revenue needed to overcome the pavement preservation funding problem. What s more, 63 percent of county residents live in municipalities and the County would need to share the revenue from a countywide property tax increase with local cities and towns, leaving too little left over to pay for roads in the unincorporated County. 3. Impose a countywide half-cent sales tax for county roads Pima County is the only Arizona county that does not have a countywide sales tax. This could raise more than enough money to overcome our pavement preservation needs in 10 years and have enough left over to reduce the County s property tax rate so that all property owners will benefit. 4. A statewide solution to a statewide problem: gas taxes The state already has a tax dedicated to roads maintenance and improvements the state gas tax. It was created for this very purpose. But it is no longer providing the revenue necessary to properly fund Arizona s transportation infrastructure needs because it hasn t been raised since What did the 1997 road bonds pay for? Pima County voters in 1997 approved borrowing $350 million against future HURF payments from the state. All but three of the 57 projects have been completed or are underway. More than 100 lane miles have been completed, relieving strangling congestion that plagued commuters, especially in the Northwest, after two decades of rapid growth. Among the roads that were widened with 1997 bonds are: River Road, Thornydale Road, Skyline Drive, Sabino Canyon, Ajo Way, Craycroft and Alvernon. In 2013, the state Auditor General, after an audit of the county s general obligation bond program, called the county s bond program "unique" and a potential model for other counties in the state to imitate. It also said the bond program was well-managed, transparent, accountable, adhered to the will of voters and benefitted citizens throughout the county. The debt payments for the bonds using HURF allocations will continue until 2024.
5 Five more facts 1. There is no magic wand to fix our roads. 2. We shouldn t keep complaining about roads if we are not willing to pay for them. 3. The best solution: Arizona needs to raise its gas tax by 10 a gallon and constitutionally protect funding from sweeps. 4. The Arizona Legislature raised the state gas tax nine times between 1960 and The state gas tax has not been increased in 24 years. Every Arizona county, nearly every municipality and every council of government (cooperative organizations of regional governments such as the Pima Association of Governments) in the past year have asked the state Legislature for an increase in the gas tax. In addition, nearly every chamber of commerce in the state plus numerous industry and trade organizations have also asked for more transportation funding. How much would that extra 10 cost us? An average driver s monthly gas tax bill of $10.39 would increase by $5.77 a month to total $16.16 FOR COMPARISON: gas tax bill with increase $16 water and sewer bill $45 electricity bill $65 cell phone bill $105 cable & internet bill $140 Your next step Contact Governor Doug Ducey and your Legislator and ask him or her to do what s right for all of us and for the state s economy and raise the state gas tax 10 cents. We can fix our roads, but we have to do it together. Arizona Governor Executive Tower 1700 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ Phoenix Office: (602) Tucson Office: (520) In-State Toll Free: (outside Maricopa County only) Arizona Legislature Capitol Complex 1700 West Washington Phoenix, AZ Information Desk (602) Toll Free:
Arizona 1. Dependent Public School Systems (14) Arizona ranks 39th among the states in number of local governments, with 639 as of June 2002.
Arizona Arizona ranks 39th among the states in number of local governments, with 639 as of June 2002. COUNTY GOVERNMENTS (15) There are no areas in Arizona lacking county government. The county governing
Arizona Department of Transportation
Fund Transfers FY 09 Savings: $34,025,100 FY 10 Savings: $50,797,200 This option would transfer monies out of the following funds and into the General Fund in FY 2009 and FY 2010. The option combines 2
DRAFT MAINTAINING HOUSTON S STREETS REPAIR, REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION. Using the Full Range of Tools for a Challenging Job
MAINTAINING HOUSTON S STREETS REPAIR, REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION Using the Full Range of Tools for a Challenging Job Report To: TTI Committee May 13, 2014 1 Pavement Management - Suggested Treatments
S.B. NO. JAN 2 2 2016
THE SENATE TWENTY-EIGHTH LEGISLATURE, 0 STATE OF HAWAII S.B. NO. JAN 0 A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO STATEWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY BUILDING CONSTRUCTION FINANCING. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE
DESCRIPTION OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING SYSTEM Livingston s accounting system is organized on the basis of Accounting Funds, each of which is considered a separate government activity with its
2014 County Ballot Issues Results General Election November 4th
Moving Alachua County Forward One Percent Transportation Sales Surtax Tourist Development Tax Valorem Tax Exemptions for New Businesses and Expansions of Existing Businesses One-half Cent Sales Surtax
2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST
2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 806 CITICENTER BUILDING 146 SOUTH HIGH STREET AKRON, OHIO 44308 December 2012 This report was prepared by the Akron Metropolitan
CHAPTER 20 COUNTY PERMISSIVE MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE TAX
CHAPTER 20 COUNTY PERMISSIVE MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE TAX Latest Revision March, 2013 20.01 INTRODUCTION In 1967 the General Assembly granted counties the authority to enact a permissive motor vehicle license
The primary focus of state and local government is to provide basic services,
Tax Relief and Local Government The primary focus of state and local government is to provide basic services, such as public safety, education, a safety net of health care and human services, transportation,
FINANCIAL PLAN. Any future earmarks are assumed to carry their own limitation and not reduce the regular limitation identified in these calculations.
VII. FINANCIAL PLAN FHWA Funds The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds are appropriated by Congress. FHWA funding levels are identified in the six-year Transportation Act. Each year, a federal
County Ballot Issues General Election November 4. Alachua County. Brevard County
Moving Alachua County Forward One Percent Transportation Sales Surtax Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions for New Businesses and Expansions of Existing Businesses One-half Cent Sales Surtax
SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX FUNDED DEBT
SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX FUNDED DEBT Secondary property tax revenue is restricted solely to paying General Obligation (G.O.) debt service. There are three components that need to be measured before additional
A Legislative Briefing prepared by Volume 7, Number 1 February 2001
fiscal forum A Legislative Briefing prepared by Volume 7, Number 1 February 2001 Mitchell E. Bean, Director P. O. Box 30014, Lansing, MI 48909-7514 517-373-8080! FAX 517-373-5874! www.house.state.mi.us/hfa
Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan
A. Long-Term Outlook Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan When examining the long-term outlook for transportation planning and programming over the foreseeable future, there are several
BASICS ON --- WEIGHT-MILE TAXES IN OREGON
ISSUE BRIEF Legislative Committee Services 453 State Capitol Salem, OR 97310-4002 503-986-1813 Janet Adkins, Committee Administrator Updated December 2000 BASICS ON --- WEIGHT-MILE TAXES IN OREGON Weight-mile
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS: Meeting the State s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility SEPTEMBER 2014 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization
Pavement Management Program
Pavement Management Program 2013 Street Maintenance Program Executive Summary 1/15/2013 Presented by Mark Thiel Assistant Director Public Works Program Overview Start of current program 2005 812.5 Lane
Implementing a Work Order and. Asset Management System? Learning Objectives. What We Have. The City of Colleyville
A Small City s Story of Implementing a Work Order and Asset Management System American Public Works Association 2013 Congress August 28, 2013 Introductions Public Works Department City of Colleyville,
Township of Enniskillen. Asset Management Plan
Township of Enniskillen Asset Management Plan 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Introduction 3 B. State of Local Infrastructure 4 C. Desired Levels of Service 7 D. Asset Management Strategy 8 E. Financing
SAN DIEGO - A BICYCLE FRIENDLY CITY
SAN DIEGO - A BICYCLE FRIENDLY CITY MANY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY The designated bicycle paths and lanes in the City of San Diego (City) are often substandard because of their location and
Chapter 5 Financial Plan
The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA_LU) requires that the MTP incorporate a financial plan for the planning period. The MTP is required to
Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :
Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n : A Growing Crisis January 2008 Cover photo : Route 3, Passaic County introduction A rising tide of traffic congestion threatens to increase roadway gridlock,
Infrastructure assets are distinguished from other capital assets because they normally:
4. REPORTING 4.2 Government-Wide Financial Statements 4.2.6 Infrastructure Reporting 4.2.6.10 Governments are required to report all of their capital assets in the statement of net position. Infrastructure
Budget Introduction Proposed Budget
Budget Introduction Proposed Budget INTRO - 1 INTRO - 2 Summary of the Budget and Accounting Structure The City of Beverly Hills uses the same basis for budgeting as for accounting. Governmental fund financial
Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)
Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014) Summary Description Proposed Project: Light Rail Transit 10.9 Miles, 9 Stations Total
Town of Huntsville Municipal Asset Management Plan
Town of Huntsville Municipal Asset Management Plan Adopted by Council (Resolution 470-13) December 20, 2013 1 P age Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Introduction... 4 State of Local Infrastructure...
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Financial and Policy Implications on Assuming Primary Responsibility for All State Routes Throughout Ohio Regardless of Local Government Jurisdiction Director Jerry Wray
CONNECTICUT S TOP TRANSPORTATION ISSUES:
CONNECTICUT S TOP TRANSPORTATION ISSUES: Meeting the State s Need for Safe, Smooth and Efficient Mobility NOVEMBER 2015 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit
COST EFFECTIVE ROAD MAINTENANCE MARCH 2015
COST EFFECTIVE ROAD MAINTENANCE MARCH 2015 According to the University of New Hampshire technology transfer Center the goal of a Road Surface Management Plan should be the following: Maximize Return on
2012-2013 Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act
C h a p t e r 9 - F i n a n c i a l P l a n a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s f o r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t s A major component of the Plan (T2040)
RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS
RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS Please provide the following information when applying to RPA 14/ATURA for Surface Transportation Program (STP) funding for projects
Services outsourced in 2013 to a third-party firm (not including parts, equipment purchased). Type of Service
Outsourcing Services outsourced in 2013 to a third-party firm (not including parts, equipment purchased). Type of Service Abandoned Vehicle Auction Auctioneer Accounts Payable Services Actuarial Services
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 2020
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 2020 1 Purpose of Strategic Plan This document serves as the road map for the Public Works Department. It identifies where we are going and how we are going
Technical Memorandum REVENUE FORECASTS. Prepared for: Prepared by:
Technical Memorandum REVENUE FORECASTS Prepared for: Prepared by: April 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 Inflation Indices... 2 1.2 Previous Studies... 3 2 Highway Revenue Baseline Forecast...
Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects
Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Economic Stimulus Program) Application Packet for: Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects APPLICATIONS DUE
WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:
WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS: Meeting the State s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility MARCH 2014 202-466-6706 www.tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit
The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.
3 Financial Plan The purpose of the financial plan is to identify funding options that would be likely sources of money to advance recommendations made by this study. The Capitol Region Transportation
AN OVERVIEW OF FUNDING SOURCES
AN OVERVIEW OF FUNDING SOURCES Property Tax Background & Definition: Ad valorem property taxes are levied based on a percentage of the fair market value of real property. Since Fiscal Year 1979, following
Asset Management for MAP-21. Gary Lasham, P.E. Jonathan Pollack
Asset Management for MAP-21 Gary Lasham, P.E. Jonathan Pollack Replaced Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) MAP-21 is transforming the policy and programmatic framework for investments
CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)
Local Assistance Program Guidelines Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) CONTENTS Section Subject Page Number 4.1 INTRODUCTION... 4-1 4.2 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA... 4-1 General... 4-1
KENTUCKY FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION CABINET. Agency Guide for the Commonwealth s Vehicles
KENTUCKY FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION CABINET Agency Guide for the Commonwealth s Vehicles Agency Guide for the Commonwealth s Vehicles Table of Contents APPLICABILITY... 4 Agency Fleet Contact... 5 MILEAGE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON
Council Meeting Date: August 11, 2014 Agenda Item: 7(c) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON AGENDA TITLE: Motion Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Transmap Corporation
SECTION I COMMISSION ACTIVITIES. Fiscal Year 2012
SECTION I COMMISSION ACTIVITIES Fiscal Year 2012 Page 2 Role of the New Jersey Commission on Capital Budgeting and Planning The New Jersey Commission on Capital Budgeting and Planning, established in 1975,
Transportation and Public Works. Business Plan 2002-2003
Business Plan 2002-2003 March 27, 2002 Mission Transportation and Public Works Construct, maintain and manage provincial highways, buildings and related infrastructure, and provide accommodation, property
Rules of Office of Administration Division 10 Commissioner of Administration Chapter 11 Travel Regulations
Rules of Office of Administration Division 10 Commissioner of Administration Chapter 11 Travel Regulations Title Page 1 CSR 10-11.010 State of Missouri Travel Regulations...3 1 CSR 10-11.020 County Travel
Successful performance management serves as
ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT C A R L O S B R A C E R A S The author is Executive Director, Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City; Chair, Project Panel on the U.S. Domestic
NEW JERSEY. New Jersey ranks 24th among the states in number of local governments, with 1,383 as of October 2007. COUNTY GOVERNMENTS (21)
NEW JERSEY New Jersey ranks 24th among the states in number of local governments, with 1,383 as of October 2007. COUNTY GOVERNMENTS (21) There are no areas in New Jersey lacking county government. The
Closed on All City of Buckeye Designated Holidays
CITY OF BUCKEYE Fleet Management PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DEFINITION OF FLEET MANAGEMENT SERVICES Scope of Services Available Public Works Department Fleet Management Division is an Automotive Service Excellence
CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)
Regional Transportation Plan 2035 28 CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND) The Cache Transportation Vision Plan shows roadway, bicycle, transit and pedestrian projects that attempt
SECTION III-06 Surfacing Page 1 Revised 3/2/10. See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway.
Page 1 Revised 3/2/10 See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway. For New/Reconstruction projects: The cross slope of the driving lanes range from 1.5% to
* Unaudited. FY 2006-07 Revenue Budget. Resource II Franchise Fees and Other Taxes $36,060,759 7% Resource II Franchise Fees and Other Taxes
Resource II Franchise Fees and Other Taxes Franchise Fees and Other Taxes The collection of fees from various franchise licenses awarded to businesses or individuals granting permission to construct, maintain,
Capital Improvement Program: Public Input and the Need for a Multi-year Plan
Attachment 1 OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT BUDGET ANALYST REPORT Date Issued: September 21, 2012 IBA Report Number: 12-39 Budget and Finance Committee Docket Date: September 26, 2012 Item Number: 8 OVERVIEW
Decision Matrix for Pavement Preservation. Mike Mamlouk Arizona State University
Decision Matrix for Pavement Preservation Mike Mamlouk Arizona State University Outline 1. Concept of preventive maintenance 2. Effectiveness of treatments 3. Treatment selection 2 Pavement Pavement Preservation
DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES OPERATION OF THE STATE VEHICLE FLEET
STATE OF ILLINOIS OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES OPERATION OF THE STATE VEHICLE FLEET NOVEMBER 2011 WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL
USE OF STATE VEHICLES
ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BOARD POLICY, VEHICLE USAGE RESCINDS: N/A ESTABLISHED: 09/11/2014 RELATED DOCUMENTS: DISTRIBUTION: All PRB Board Members and employees Office/desk copy Employees working for the
Transportation Funding Overview SAMCo. Victor Boyer, Executive Director San Antonio Mobility Coalition (SAMCo) January 10, 2006
Transportation Funding Overview SAMCo Victor Boyer, Executive Director San Antonio Mobility Coalition (SAMCo) January 10, 2006 San Antonio Mobility Coalition, Inc: Non profit, public/private partnership
