Design and Analysis of a Storage Container Used in Missile

Transcription

1 Design and of a Storage Container Used in Missile 75 Prudvi Raju. Devarapalli M.Tech Student Technology, Ongole Venkata Ramesh Mamilla Associate Professor Technology Ongole M.V. Mallikarjun Professor Technology Ongole ABSTRACT In this paper a container was designed which is used for transportation and storage of missile. The Missile container is made of composite shell structure stiffened with rectangular ribs on the interior surface. The opening to insert the missile is given at the rear end, which has very small contact area at the closing region. As a result manufacturing becomes easier. It was identified several causes of disturbances which damages the container such as internal pressure load, Stacking load, Braking load and lifting load.efforts have been made to design and optimize the container for the above mentioned loads. Detailed finite element stress analysis is carried out to determine the static response of the designed composite missile container structure under mechanical loads. Ansys package has been employed to perform the structural analysis. Keywords: Design,, Storage Container, Missile. 1. INTRODUCTION Missile is an object capable of being projected, usually with the intent of striking some distant object. More particularly, a missile is usually a weapon that is self-propelled after leaving the launching device. In other words, missile is a rocketpropelled weapon designed to deliver an explosive warhead with great accuracy at high speed. Missiles are sturdy, well-constructed machines. But, because of their size, weight, and bulk, they are not that easy to handle nor are missiles indestructible. Most missile damage is, unfortunately, a result of carelessness and poor handling practices. To reduce the possibility of damage, missiles are shipped, stored and handled with special equipments. Approved containers, canisters, and handling equipments provide maximum missile safety with minimum handling by personnel. The missile container used previously was of lid type (suitcase) containers. This type of container has large contact area at the closing region. So it is very important that the manufacturer has to take extreme care in producing this container without any warpage at the closing region. Else there will be a leakage of gas from the gap developed due to warpage. Therefore the manufacturing becomes more complex and more expensive. Missile is an object capable of being projected, usually with the intent of striking some distant object. More particularly, a missile is usually a weapon that is self-propelled after leaving the launching device. In other words, missile is a rocketpropelled weapon designed to deliver an explosive warhead with great accuracy at high speed. Missiles are sturdy, well-constructed machines. But, because of their size, weight, and bulk, they are not that easy to handle nor are missiles indestructible. Most missile damage is, unfortunately, a result of carelessness and poor handling practices. To reduce the possibility of damage, missiles are shipped, stowed and handled with special equipments. Approved containers, canisters, and handling equipments provide maximum missile safety with minimum handling by personnel. There are different and specialized types of containers, canisters, and handling equipments in the ordnance field. Many are designed for a single purpose or use and cannot be interchanged with comparable items. The containers, canisters, and handling equipments used to deliver missiles to a ship. 1.1 Composite Material The use of a combination of different materials, which result in superior products, started in antiquity and has been used

2 76 continuously down to the present day. In early history mud bricks were reinforced with straw to build houses; more recently man-made stone was reinforced with steel bars (reinforced concrete) to build modern buildings, and bridges, etc, and now composites of matrix reinforced with fibers are used to build airframe structures. Modern composites owe much to glass fiber-polyester composites developed since the 1940 s, to wood working over the past centuries, and to nature over millions of years. Numerous examples of composites exist in nature, such as bamboo, which is a filamentary composite. Through the years, wood has been a commonly used natural composite whose properties with and against the grain vary significantly. Such directional or isotropic properties have been mastered by design approaches, which make advantage of the superior properties while suppressing the undesirable ones through the use of lamination. Plywood s, for example, are made with a number of lamina. Such a stacking arrangement is necessary in order to prevent warping. In the language of modern composites, this is referred to as the symmetric lay-up or zero extension-flexure coupling (orthotropic). Composite materials, often shortened to composites or called composition materials, are engineered or naturally occurring materials made from two or more constituent materials with significantly different physical or chemical properties which remain separate and distinct at the macroscopic or microscopic scale within the finished structure. The advantages of composite materials are that, if well designed, they usually exhibit the best qualities of their components or constituents and often some qualities that neither constituent possesses. Some of the properties that can be improved by forming a composite material are: High Strength-to-Weight ratio High stiffness High corrosion resistance High wear resistance Attractiveness High fatigue life Temperature independent behavior Thermal insulation Acoustical insulation Naturally, neither all of above properties can be improved at the same time nor is there usually any requirement to do so. In fact, some of the properties are in conflict with one another, e.g., thermal insulation versus thermal conductivity. The objective is merely to create a material that has only the characteristics needed to perform the required task as per the design. like high strength, low density and easy to manufacturing etc. The container of the missile is made of composite shell structure stiffened with rectangular ribs on the interior surface. The missile is placed on the bulk head which supports the weight of the missile. The arrestors are made of mild steel used to locate the missile in the container. Nitrogen gas is filled in the container to maintain low temperature for the sensors of the missile. Fill port, vent port and pressure gauges are used for filling nitrogen gas. Lifting hooks are made of forged alloy steel are provided to facilitate lifting of the missile container. Fiber arrangement plays major role in carrying the loads. Fiber arrangement (layer orientation) is to optimize resistance to loads: ±45 degree plies give buckling stability and carry shear 0 degree plies give column stability and carry tension or compression ±90 degree plies carry transverse load Layer orientation = -90, -45, 0, 45, 90 Figure 1: 3D view of the container 3. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Static analysis deals with the conditions of equilibrium of the bodies acted upon by forces. A static analysis can be either linear or non-linear. All types of non-linearity are allowed such as large deformations, plasticity, creep and stress. Static analysis result of structural displacements, stresses and strains in structures for components caused by loads will give a clear idea about whether the structure or components will withstand for the applied maximum loads. If the stress values obtained in this analysis crosses the allowable values it will result in the failure of the structure in the static condition itself. To avoid such a failure, this analysis has been carried out. 3.1 Structural of Missile Container with 4 mm Thickness Internal Pressure of MPa 2. DESIGN AND MODELLING 2.1 Construction of Missile Container Missile container is constructed by using fiber reinforced composite, i.e., E-glass epoxy, because of its unique properties Figure 2: Von mises stress plot

3 77 The maximum stress singularity is 97.4 MPa. Stacking Load of 1320 Kg 3.2 Structural of Missile Container With 6 mm Thickness Internal Pressure of MPa Figure 3: Von mises stress plot Braking Load of N Figure 6: Von mises stress plots Stacking Load of 1320 Kg Lifting Load of 1320 kg Figure 4: Von mises stress Figure 7: Von mises stress Braking Load of N Figure 5: Von mises stress Figure 8: Von mises stress

4 78 Lifting Load of 1320 kg (Modified) Figure 9: Von mises stress 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Composite container was studied for 4 different cases for existing and modified model with 4 mm and 6 mm thickness: Case 1 Internal pressure of Mpa Case 2 Stacking analysis Case 3 Braking analysis with 0.5g acceleration Case 4 Lifting analysis The strength of EGlass/Epoxy in different directions is tabulated below. Strength in the fiber direction, X L 1.03 X 10 3 Strength in the transverse direction, X T 33 Shear strength, S The results obtained for various analyses with 4 mm thickness for existing and modified models are tabulated below: Internal Pressure Stacking (kg) Braking (N) Lifting (kg) Existing Ux (mm) Uy (mm) Uz (mm) Max Modified Ux (mm) Uy (mm) Uz (mm) Max Linearised (Mpa) The above table shows the results of the missile container with 4 mm thickness. From the results shown in the above table for existing model with 4 mm thickness it is observed that the maximum linearised stress of 37 Mpa, 46 Mpa, 71 Mpa and 36 Mpa is observed for Internal Pressure, Stacking, Bracking and lifting loads respectively for the existing model with 4mm thickness. From these results it can be concluded that the stresses are more than the fibre strength in transverse direction and shear. From the above results it can be concluded that that existing missile container with 4 mm thickness is not safe under the given operating conditions. From the results shown in the above table for Modified model with 4 mm thickness it is observed that the maximum linearised stress of 27.8 Mpa, 68 Mpa, 87 Mpa and 27 Mpa is observed for Internal Pressure, Stacking, Bracking and lifting analysis respectively for the modified model with 4 mm thickness. From these results it can be concluded that the stresses are more than the fibre strength in transverse direction and shear for stacking and bracking loads. From the above results it can be concluded that that modified missile container with 4 mm thickness is not safe under the given stacking and bracking operating conditions. 5. CONCLUSION The Missile container is made of composite shell structure stiffened with rectangular ribs on the interior surface. To reduce the possibility of damage, missiles are shipped, stored and handled with approved missile containers. Approved containers, provide maximum missile safety with minimum handling by personnel. This makes the design and manufacturing of missile container a critical importance. It is also identified that the missile container is subjected to internal pressure load, Stacking load, Braking load and lifting load. From the results it is observed that VonMises stress is exceeding the yield strength of the material in the transverse direction with 4 mm thickness in braking analysis which is the worst case. So, it is concluded that the design is not safe for 4 mm thickness. Then the thickness of the container is increased from 4 mm to 6 mm and a detailed finite element analysis has been done for all above load cases. From the results it is observed that VonMises stress is less than the yield strength of the material in all the 4 load cases. Therefore it is concluded that the modified model with 6mm thickness is safe for all above operation loads. REFERENCES [1] Dorothy, S. Ng (1999). Structural of Storage Container, U.S. department of energy. [2] Charles P. Haber (1976). Dynamic and Structural of Reusable Shipping & Storage Container for Encapsulated Harpoon Missile, Defense Technical Information Center, Europe. [3] Cardinal, J.W., Dobosz, S.A., Pomerening, D.J. (1987). Nondestructive of MK 607 Harpoon Missile container, Southwest Research Institute,

5 79 [4] Federico A. Tavarez, Lawrence C. Bank, and Michael E. Plesha (2003). ACI Structural Journal, of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite, Vol. 36, No. 8, [5] Panos Y. Papalambros (1990). Journal of Mechanisms, Journal on Mechanical Design, Vol. 40, No [6] Stephen W. Tsai (1996), Structural Behavior of Composite Materials, NASA, U.S. [7] A. Puck, H. Schürmann (1998). Failure of FRP Laminates, [8] Hwai-Chung Wu, Bin Mu, Kraig Warnemuende (2003). Failure of FRP Sandwich Bus Panels by Finite Element Method, [9] Swanson, R.S. (1997). Introduction to Design and with Advanced Composite Materials. Prentice Hall, Inc