Col.lecció d Economia E14/310. Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance. Anna Castañer M. Mercè Claramunt Maite Mármol


 Scot Shelton
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Col.lecció d Economia E14/310 Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance Anna Castañer M. Mercè Claramunt Maite Mármol
2 UB Economics Working Papers 2014/310 Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance Abstract: Reinsurance is one of the tools that an insurer can use to mitigate the underwriting risk and then to control its solvency. In this paper, we focus on the proportional reinsurance arrangements and we examine several optimization and decision problems of the insurer with respect to the reinsurance strategy. To this end, we use as decision tools not only the probability of ruin but also the random variable deficit at ruin if ruin occurs. The discounted penalty function Gerber & Shiu, 1998) is employed to calculate as particular cases the probability of ruin and the moments and the distribution function of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs. We consider the classical risk theory model assuming a Poisson process and an individual claim amount phasetype distributed, modified with a proportional reinsurance with a retention level that is not constant and depends on the level of the surplus. Depending on whether the initial surplus is below or above a threshold level, the discounted penalty function behaves differently. General expressions for this discounted penalty function are obtained, as well as interesting theoretical results and explicit expressions for phasetype 2 distribution. These results are applied in numerical examples of decision problems based on the probability of ruin and on different risk measures of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs the expectation, the Value at Risk and the Tail Value at Risk). JEL Codes: G22. Keywords: Deficit at ruin, GerberShiu function, Risk measures. Anna Castañer Facultat d'economia i Empresa Universitat de Barcelona M. Mercè Claramunt Facultat d'economia i Empresa Universitat de Barcelona Maite Mármol Facultat d'economia i Empresa Universitat de Barcelona Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia MICINN) for its support grant ECO C0303).. ISSN
3 1. Introduction The influence of reinsurance strategies on the solvency of the insurer is an important subject and has been widely analyzed in actuarial literature see e.g. Castañer et al. 2010, 2012), Dickson & Waters 1996) and Centeno 1986, 2002, 2005)). Several optimization problems have been considered using different kinds of reinsurance strategies, being the proportional, the excess of loss and the stoploss the most wellknown see Centeno & Simões 2009) and the references therein). One of the main measures used to control solvency is ruin probability, but in this paper we use alsoother measures related to the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, as its expectation or the Value at Risk VaR) or the Tail Value at Risk TVaR). We study the random variable deficit at ruin if ruin occurs in the classical risk theory model considering a proportional reinsurance arrangement, where the retention level is not constant and depends on the level of the surplus. This type of reinsurance, called threshold proportional reinsurance, has been first defined and studied in Castañer et al. 2010, 2012), and includes, as a particular case, the classical proportional reinsurance with constant retention level. In the classical risk theory model, the surplus, Rt), at a given time t [0, ) is defined as Rt) = u+ct St), with u = R0) 0 being the insurer s initial surplus, St) the aggregate claims and c the instantaneous premium rate. St) is modeled as a compound Poisson process St) = Nt) The claim number process {N t)} t=0 is assumed to be Poisson with parameter λ. Specifically, the corresponding claim interarrival times, denoted by {T i } are independent and identically distributed i.i.d.) exponentially distributed random variables with parameter λ, where T 1 denotes the time until the first claim and T i, for i > 1, denotes the time between the i 1)th and ith claims. The random variables {X i } are the positive claim severities, which are i.i.d. random variables with common probability density function f x) and {N t)} t=0 is independent of {X i,i 1}. We assume that the insurer s premium income is received continuously at rate c per unit time, where c = λe[x]1+ρ), and ρ > 0 is the premium loading factor. The time of ruin is T = min{t 0 Rt) < 0}, with T = if Rt) 0 for all t 0. The deficit at ruin if ruin occurs is Y = R + T) and the surplus immediately prior to ruin is R T). The probability of ultimate ruin from initial surplus u is denoted ψu) and defined by X i. ψu) = P [T < R0) = u] = E{IT < ) R0) = u}, 2
4 where IA) = 1 if A occurs and IA) = 0 otherwise. Gerber & Shiu 1998) introduced the GerberShiu discounted penalty function φu), [ φu) = E e δt w R T), R + T) ) ] IT < ) R0) = u, 1.1) being δ 0 the discounted factor, and wl,j), l 0, j > 0, the penalty function, so that φu) is the expected discounted penalty payable at ruin. This function is known to satisfy a defective renewal equation Gerber & Shiu, 1998, Li & Garrido, 2004, Willmot, 2007). This function can be used to study the traditional quantities of interest in classical ruin theory, such as ruin probability, time of ruin or deficit at ruin. Therefore, depending on the penalty function wl, j), we can obtain different interpretations for the GerberShiu function: i) For wl,j) = 1, [ ] φu) = E e δt IT < ) R0) = u, i.e. the Laplace transform of the time of ruin being δ the parameter. In addition, if we consider δ = 0, the ultimate ruin probability is obtained φu) = ψu). ii) For wl,j) = j m and m 1, φu) = E [ ] e δt j m IT < ) R0) = u, and dividing this GerberShiu function by the probability of ruin, the ordinary discounted moments of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs are obtained, α m Y) = E[ e δt j m IT < ) R0) = u ] ψu). 1.2) If we let δ = 0 in 1.2), the ordinary moments of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs are obtained. iii) For wl,j) = Ij y), φu) = E [ ] e δt Ij y)it < ) R0) = u, and dividing by the probability of ruin we obtain the distribution function of the discounted deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, F Y y) = E[ e δt Ij y)it < ) R0) = u ] ψu). 1.3) If we let δ = 0, the distribution function of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs is obtained. 3
5 The threshold proportional reinsurance strategy is a dynamic strategy with a retention level that is not constant and depends on the level of the surplus, Rt). A retention level k 1 is applied whenever the reserves are less than a threshold b 0, and a retention level k 2 is applied in the other case. Then, the premium income retained is c 1 and c 2, respectively. We consider that the retention levels give new positive security loadings for the insurer, i.e. the net profit condition is always fulfilled. Then, we can define ρ 1 = ρ R ρ R ρ k 1 factor of reinsurer. and ρ 2 = ρ R ρ R ρ k 2, being ρ R the loading The main objective of this paper is to study the effect of the threshold proportional reinsurance on the probability of ruin and on the other risk measures related with the deficit at ruin. We also perform a comparative analysis with the proportional reinsurance. Our results can assist the insurer in his reinsurance decision process concerning solvency related optimality problems in reinsurance can be found for instance in Dimitrova & Kaishev 2010), Kaishev & Dimitrova 2006) and Castañer et al. 2013)). After this introduction, the paper is organized as follows. In the next section some assumptions and some preliminaries are included. In Section 3.1, we present some general results for the GerberShiu function for the ruin probability, the ordinary moments and the distribution function of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, when the individual claim amount follows a general phasetype distribution. In Section 3.2, we assume a phasetype 2 distribution and analyzed the previous results. Then, the explicit expressions are obtained. An interesting result about the distribution of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs in a model with a threshold reinsurance is demonstrated in Theorem 3.4. In Section 4, some optimization and decision problems of the reinsurance strategy are presented. In this analysis, the ruin probability and the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs are used as decision tools for the insurer. This section includes some numerical examples. Section 5 closes the paper giving some concluding remarks. 2. Assumptions and preliminaries In this paper we analyze the deficit at ruin in the classical risk theory model assuming a compound Poisson process for the aggregate claims and a phasetype distribution for the individual claim amount, when the insurer considers a threshold proportional reinsurance. In this model with threshold proportional reinsurance strategy, the discounted penalty function 1.1) behaves differently, depending on whether initial surplus u is below or above the level b. Hence, for 4
6 notational convenience, we write φ 1 u), 0 u < b, φu) = φ 2 u), u b. In Castañer et al. 2010) a theorem for the integrodifferential equation for the GerberShiu function 1.1) is obtained in a Poisson model for the claim process. We include this theorem in order that the paper is selfcontained, taking into account that we will use it in the next sections. Theorem 2.1. The discounted penalty function φu) in a Poisson process model satisfies the integrodifferential equations φ φ 1 u), 0 u < b, u) = 2.1) φ 2 u), u b, where φ 1u) = λ+δ φ 1 u) λ u k 1 φ 1 u k 1 x)dfx) λ ξ 1 u), c 1 c 1 0 c [ 1 φ 2u) = λ+δ φ 2 u) λ u b k 2 φ 2 u k 2 x)dfx) 2.2) c 2 c 2 + u k 2 u b k 2 φ 1 u k 2 x)dfx) 0 ] λ c 2 ξ 2 u), and ξ 1 u) = wu,k 1 x u)fx)dx, ξ 2 u) = u k 1 wu,k 2 x u)fx)dx. 2.3) u k 2 Let wr T), R + T) ) be a nonnegative function of R T) > 0, the surplus immediately before ruin, and R + T) > 0 the surplus at ruin. As we focus our analysis on the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, we will consider only a specific subgroup of penalty functions WD = {wl,j) = j m,wl,j) = Ij y),wl,j) = 1} with m > 0. We assume that the individual claim amount follows a phasetype distribution P Hα, S). Key results of modern theory of phasetype distributions including theoretical properties, characterization and applications can be found in Neuts 1981, 1989), O Cinneide 1990), Latouche & Ramaswami 1999) or Asmussen 2003). Most of the original applications of phasetype distributions are in queuing theory, but these kind of distributions are widely used in risk theory 5
7 in the last years. In Asmussen & Albrecher 2010) many applications in this field can be found. Other important references on phasetype distributions in risk theory context include Asmussen & Rolski 1992), Rolski et al. 1999), Asmussen & Bladt 1996), Bladt 2005) or Drekic et al. 2004). We present a brief overview of phasetype distributions and their properties. Phasetype distributions: We consider a continuous time Markov chain with a single absorbing state 0 and N transient states. The row vector α contains the probabilities α j that the process starts in the various transient states j = 1,2,...,N. If the probability of starting the process in the absorbing state is zero, N j=1 α j = 1. Then, αe T = 1 where e T is a column vector of ones with n 1 elements. The infinitesimal generator Q for the continuous time Markov chain is given by Q = 0 0, S 0 S where S is the matrix of transition rates among the transient states and S 0 is the column vector of absorption rates into state 0 from the transient states. Necessarily, S 0 = Se T, and S is an N N matrix whose diagonal entries are negative and whose other entries are nonnegative. Under these assumptions, the distribution of time X until the process reaches the absorbing state is said to be phasetype distributed and is denoted P Hα, S) with distribution F X x) = 1 αexpsx)e T for x 0, density function f X x) = αexpsx)s 0 for x > 0 and ordinary moments α m X) = 1) m m!αs m e T, being exp ) the matrix exponential. N, The Laplace transform of the density function f X t) = 0 e tx f X x)dx is rational of degree f X t) = at) bt), with at) = N a i t i, a 0 = 0, bt) = N b i t i, b 0 = 1 and f X x) satisfies the linear differential equation i=0 i=0 N i=0 b i f i) X x) = ) The finite mixture of phasetype distributions is phasetype distributed. Let X i, i = 1,...,k distributed as PHα i,s i ), and Y = I i X i being k I i = 1, and P I i = 1) = p i then Y is PHα,S) with 6
8 S S α = p 1 α 1,...,p k α k ) and S = ) S k Phasetype distributions with N = 2 are phasetype distributions with λ αλ S =, 2.6) βµ µ where λ,µ > 0 and 0 α, β 1, αβ < 1 with a density satisfying 2.4), i.e., f x)+b 1 f x)+ b 2 f x) = 0. If b 2 < 0, the exponential distribution is obtained and all other phasetype distributions are obtained when b 2 > 0. In Dickson & Hipp 2000) it is demonstrated that any phasetype distribution with N = 2 is either an hyperexponential distribution or a linear combination of an exponential and an Erlang2) with the same scalar parameter. Then, following Dickson & Hipp 2000), a phasetype distribution with N = 2, can be always expressed in standardized form with α 1,α 2 ), S = a 1 a 2, a 1,a 2,a 4 0, being a 1 = β 1, a 4 = β 2 and a 2 = 0 for the hyperexponentialβ 0 a 4 1,β 2 )distributionanda 1 = a 2 = a 4 = β foralinearcombinationofanexponentialβ) and an Erlang2,β). It is easy to prove that the following relations are fulfilled for the standardized form, b 1 = a 1+a 4 a 1 a 4 and b 2 = 1 a 1 a 4 and that the density function using the standardized form is f x) = α 1 a 1 a 2 )e a 1x +α 2 a 4 e a 4x +α 1 a 4 a 2 xe a 1x. 3. GerberShiu function with X phasetype 2 distributed In order to find the expression of the GerberShiu function if the individual claim amount follows a phasetype distribution we first need to obtain the ordinary differential equation from the integrodifferential equation included in Theorem 2.1 and then, solve it. In this section, we present some results that are general and useful for any phasetype, the ordinary differential equation and the expression for ξ s u) for s = 1,2. Next, we obtain the explicit expression for the GerberShiu function for N = General results In Theorem 3.1, we present the ordinary differential equation for the GerberShiu function in a Poisson process model.it is general with respect the three specific expressions included in W D. 7
9 This is an important result that implies that if we are analyzing the probability of ruin or the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, the structure of the solution will be the same. Then, where is the difference? The difference is included in the expression of ξ s u) for s = 1,2. In Theorem 3.2, we present a general expression of ξ s u). Theorem 3.1. If the individual claim amount is distributed as a PHα,S) and wl,j) = wj), φu) is the solution of the ordinary differential equation, φ N+1) s u) = δ c s k N s b N ) λ+δ φ s u)+ b ) N 1 φ N) s u) c s k s b N + N 1 j=1 λ c s b N 1 k N j s N 1 h=j+1 λ c s f N 1 j) 0)+ b j 1 k s b N λ+δ)b j c s b N 3.1) b h f h j 1) 0) φ j) s u), where φ s u), s = 1,2 being s = 1 for 0 < u < b and s = 2 for u > b. The proof of Theorem 3.1 is included in Appendix A. Theorem 3.2. Let the individual claim amount X PHα,S). Then ξ s u) = H s u) G s, s = 1,2, being H s u) = 1 F Xs u)), S = S k s, X s PHα,S ) and for Z PHα, S ) and α = αexps u) H su). α m Z) if wl,j) = j m, m 1, G s = F Z y) if wl,j) = Ij y), 1 if wl,j) = 1, Proof. Taking into account 2.3), if the penalty function is equal to 1, assuming that X PHα,S) ξ s u) = u ks where S = S k s and X s PHα,S ). f X x)dx = αexps u)e T = 1 F Xs u) = H s u), 3.2) 8
10 If the penalty function is j m, then ξ s u) = = Let α = αexps u) H su), then u ks 0 ξ s u) = H s u) k s x u) m f X x)dx = z m αexps u)exps z) S e T) dz, s = 1, z m α exps z) S e T) dz, s = 1,2, z m 1 ) u+z f X dz 3.3) k s k s and taking into account that α exps z) S e T) = f Z z) being Z PHα,S ), ξ s u) = H s u) 1) m m!α S ) m e T = H s u)α m Z), s = 1,2. 3.4) If the penalty function is Ij y), ξ s u) = u+y ks u ks df X x) = 1 αexps u+y))e T 1+αexpS u)e T = αexps u)e T αexps u)exps y)e T, s = 1,2, 3.5) and considering α and H s u), ξ s u) = H s u) 1 α exps y)e T) = H s u)f Z y), s = 1,2. 3.6) 3.2. Results for N = 2 From Theorem 3.2, we derive the following corollary, that gives the expression of ξ s u), s = 1,2 assuming a PHα,S) with N = 2 expressed in standardized form. Corollary 3.3. From Theorem 3.2, if the individual claim amount is PHα,S) with N = 2 expressed in standardized form, being a i,s the elements of S = S k s, s = 1,2, For the penalty functions ξ s u) = C s) 1 e a 1,su +C s) 2 e a 4,su +C s) 3 ue a 1,su, s = 1,2. i) wl,j) = 1: C s) 1 = α 1, C s) 2 = α 2 and C s) 3 = α 1 a 2,s. m! m 1 = α 1 ii) wl,j) = j m : C s) a m 1,s +m! a 2,s a m+1 1,s a i 1,s a i 4,s ), C s) 2 = α 2 m! a m 4,s and C s) m! 3 = α 1 a 2,s a m. 4,s 9
11 iii) wl,j) = Ij y): C s) 1 = α 1 1 e a 1,sy ), C s) 2 = α 2 1 e a 4,sy ) α 1 a 2,s ye a 1,sy and C s) 3 = α 1 a 2,s 1 e a 1,sy ). Proof. Let X PHα,S), being S a matrix expressed in standardized form, and being a i,s the elements of S = S k s,s = 1,2. For wl,j) = 1, from 3.2), if we let a i,s = a i k s, ξ s u) = α 1,α 2 ) e a 1,su a 2,s ue a 1,su e T = α 1 e a1,su +α 2 e a4,su +α 1 a 2,s ue a1,su. 0 e a 4,su For wl,j) = j m, from 3.4), and substituting α = αexps u) H su), ξ s u) = m! 1) m αexps u)s ) m e T = m! 1) m α 1,α 2 ) e a 1,su a 2,s ue a 1,su 0 e a 4,su a 1,s a 2,s 0 a 4,s m e T, being then m! ξ s u) = α 1 a 1 a 2 0 a 4 a m 1,s +m! a 2,s a m+1 1,s m m = 1) m a i 1,sa i 4,s And for wl,j) = Ij y), from 3.6) and using α, ) 1 a m 1,s a 2,s a m+1 1,s m 1 0 a m 4,s a i 1,s a i 4,s, e a1,su m! +α 2 a m e a4,su m! +α 1 4,s a m a 2,s ue a1,su. 4,s ξ s u) = αexps u)e T αexps y)exps u)e T = α 1 1 e a 1,s y ) e a 1,su + α 2 1 e a 4,s y ) α 1 a 2,s ye a 1,sy ) e a 4,su + α 1 1 e a 1,s y ) a 2,s ue a 1,su. Then, the corollary is proved. Obviously, from Corollary 3.3, it is possible to obtain the particular cases included in phasetype 2 distributions. If we consider the hyperexponentialβ 1,β 2 ) distribution, a 1 = β 1, a 2 = 0 and a 4 = β 2. Then, for the penalty function equal to 1, C s) 1 = α 1, C s) 2 = α 2 and C s) 3 = 0; for the penalty function equal to j m, C s) ks 1 = α m m! 1 β m 1, C s) 2 = α 2 k m s m! β m 2 and C s) 3 = 0; and for penalty ) function equal to Ij y), C s) 1 = α 1 1 e β 1 ks ), y C s) 2 = α 2 1 e β 2 ks y and C s) 3 = 0. 10
12 If we consider a linear combination of an exponentialβ) and an Erlang2,β), a 1 = a 2 = a 4 = β. Then, for the penalty function equal to 1, C s) 1 = α 1, C s) 2 = α 2 and C s) 3 = α 1 β k s ; for the penalty function equal to j m, C s) ks 1 = α m m+1)! 1 β, C s) k m s 2 = α m m! 2 β and C s) k m s 3 = α m 1 m! 1 ; and β m 1 for the penalty function equal to Ij y), C s) 1 = α 1 1 e β y) ks, C s) 2 = α 2 1 e β y) ks α 1 β k s ye β ks y and C s) 3 = α 1 β k s 1 e β ks y). If, in addition, we consider α 1 = 1 and α 2 = 0, then we get the Erlang2, β) distribution. The exponential distribution is not a phasetype 2, but it can be obtained considering that α 1 = 0 and α 2 = 1. Once we have obtained the different expressions of ξ s u), we can solve the integrodifferential equation for the GerberShiu function. From 3.1), if N = 2, φ s u) = + λ+δ b ) 1 φ s u) 3.7) c s k s b 2 λ+δ)b1 b 0 c s k s b 2 ksb 2 λ ) f 0) φ 2 c s k su)+ δ s c s ksb 2 φ s u), 2 where φ s u), s = 1,2 being s = 1 for 0 < u < b and s = 2 for u > b. In order to solve 3.7) we obtain the characteristic equation for 0 u < b, and for u b, λ+δ r 3 b ) 1 r 2 λ+δ)b1 b 0 c 1 k 1 b 2 c 1 k 1 b 2 k1 2b λ ) f 0) r δ 2 c 1 k 1 c 1 k1 2b 2 λ+δ r 3 b ) 1 r 2 λ+δ)b1 b 0 c 2 k 2 b 2 c 2 k 2 b 2 k2 2b λ ) f 0) r δ 2 c 2 k 2 c 2 k2 2b 2 = 0, = 0, with r i, i = 1,...,6, real and distinct roots of the characteristic equations, so φ 1 u) = 3 F i e riu, 0 u < b, φu) = φ 2 u) = 6 F i e riu, u b. i=4 3.8) To obtain the ruin probability, and the moments and the deficit at ruin not their present values) we have to consider δ = 0, so r 3 = r 6 = 0. Then, to determine F i, i = 1,...,6, we need six equations. One equation is obtained from lim φu) = 0, that gives F 6 = 0. Another equation comes from the continuity condition u φ 1 u) u=b = φ 2 b). 3.9) The other four conditions are obtained substituting 3.8) in 2.2), integrating and rearranging terms, considering Corollary 3.3, and taking into account the values of a 1, a 2 and a 4. For 11
13 the hyperexponentialβ 1,β 2 ) distribution, let us define h 1 = C1) 1 α 1, h 2 = C1) 2 α 2, h 3 = C2) 1 h 4 = C2) 2 α 2, then the four equations are α 1 and β 1 5 i=4 β 2 5 i=4 F i e β 1 3 β 2 3 r i + β ) 1 b k 2 r i k 2 +β 1 +β 1 r F i e i + β 2 )b k 2 +β 2 r i k 2 +β 2 F i r i k 1 +β 1 = h 1, F i r i k 1 +β 2 = h 2, 3.10) 3 3 F i 1 e F i 1 e r i + β ) ) 1 b k 2 r i k 2 +β 1 = h 3, r i + β ) ) 2 b k 2 r i k 2 +β 2 = h 4. For the linear combination of an exponentialβ) and an Erlang2,β), let us define h 1 = C 1) 1 +C 1) 2, h 2 = C1) 3 k 1 α 1 β, h 3 = C 2) α 2 β α 1β 2 b k 2 ) 5 i=4 +α 1 β 2 3 β 5 i= C 2) 3 k 2 α 1 β 2 and h 4 = C2) α 1 F i β 2 r i k 1 +β) r i + β ) b k2 F i e r i k 2 +β +α 1 β 2 r i + F i 1 e β ) ) b k2 3, then the four equations are α 2 F i β r i k 1 +β = h 1, F i β r i k 1 +β = h 2, 3.11) 5 r i k 2 +β) 2 +α 2 β ) r F i e i + β b k2 3 r i k 2 +β +β 3 r i + β ) b r k2 F i e + α 1β 2 i + β ) b k2 b F i e r i k 2 +β) 2 k 2 r i k 2 +β i=4 r i + F i 1 e β ) ) b k2 3 r i + F i 1 e β ) ) b k2 r i k 2 +β = h 3, r i k 2 +β = h 4. Let us rewrite the linear equation system formed by 3.9) and 3.10) or 3.11) in matrix form, A F = H, being F the vector of unknowns, F = F j ) j=1,...,5, considering H the vector of independent terms H = 0,h 1,h 2,h 3,h 4 ), and A the matrix of the coefficients of the system. Solving the system we obtain F = A 1 H, so F j = 4 h i f ji, j = 1,...,5, being f ji the elements of the matrix A 1. From 3.8), φ 1 u) = 3 F i e riu = 4 h z φu) = z=1 φ 2 u) = 5 F i e riu = 4 h z i=4 z=1 3 f iz e riu = 4 h z c z u), 0 u < b, z=1 5 f iz e riu = 4 h z d z u), u b. i=4 z=1 3.12) 12
14 being c z u) = 3 f iz e riu and d z u) = 5 f iz e riu. i=4 From the definition of h z, z = 1,...,4, it is straightforward that in the ruin probability case, h z = 1. Then, from 3.12), φ 1 u) = ψ 1 u) = 4 c z u) and φ 2 u) = ψ 2 u) = 4 d z u). z=1 Theorem 3.4. The deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, Y, is distributed as a phasetype PHτ u),m) where τ u) = P1 z u)) z=1,...,4 being P1 z u) = czu) ψ 1 u) if 0 u < b, and τ u) = P2 zu)) z=1,...,4 being P2 z u) = dzu) ψ 2 u) if u b, and M = T 1 0, 0 T 2 being T s = a 1 α 1 a 2 k s k s 0 a 4 k s, s = 1,2. Proof. The distribution of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs from 1.3) and δ = 0 is F Y y) = φu) ψu). For 0 u < b, from 3.12), F Y y) = φ 1u) ψ 1 u) = 1 ψ 1 u) 4 h z c z u) = z=1 z=1 4 h z P1 z u). 3.13) Knowing the values of h z, z = 1,...,4, defined in 3.10) and 3.11), and considering the values of C s) i obtain in Corollary 3.3 for wl,j) = Ij y), substituting in 3.13), and grouping terms we ) ) F Y y) = 1 W 1 u) P11 u) W 1 u), P1 2u) W 1 u) expt 1 y)e T W 2 u) P13 u) W 2 u), P1 4u) W 2 u) expt 2 y)e T, 3.14) being Let γ = z=1 W 1 u) = P1 1 u)+p1 2 u), W 2 u) = P1 3 u)+p1 4 u), T s = a 1 k s α 1a 2 k s. 0 a 4 k s ) ) P11 u) W 1 u), P1 2u) W 1 u) and δ = P13 u) W 2 u), P1 4u) W 2 u), then 3.14) can be written as F Y y) = 1 W 1 u)γexpt 1 y)e T W 2 u)δexpt 2 y)e T. Taking into account that T s, s = 1,2 has the structure defined in 2.6), then the distribution of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs is a mixture of two phasetype distributions, Y 1 PHγ,T 1 ) 13
15 and Y 2 PHδ,T 2 ), being the weights W 1 u) and W 2 u). Then, considering that the finite mixture of a phasetype distribution is a phasetype distribution, from 2.5), the theorem for 0 u < b is proved. For u b, applying a similar process it can be demonstrated that Y PHτ u),m), with τ u) = P2 z u)) z=1,...,4. So, Y is a mixture of two phasetype distributions Y 1 PHµ,T 1 ) ) ) and Y 2 PHυ,T 2 ) with µ = P21 u) V 1 u), P2 2u) V 1 u) and υ = P23 u) V 2 u), P2 4u) V 2 u), being the weights V 1 u) = P2 1 u)+p2 2 u)) and V 2 u) = P2 3 u)+p2 4 u)). Example 3.5. As an example, we calculate the probabilities of ruin and the distribution of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs assuming a threshold reinsurance strategy with X i Erlang2,β) and the following values for the parameters β = 2, λ = 1, b = 2, k 1 = 0.8, k 2 = 0.45, ρ = 0.15, ρ R = 0.25 and δ = 0. Let us first obtain the ruin probability. We know that, in this case, the independent terms of system 3.11), h z, z = 1,...,4 are equal to one and that the matrix A 1 is A 1 = Then, we have ψ 1 u) = e u e u, ψ 2 u) = e u e u. Let us know consider the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs. From Theorem 3.4, Y is distributed as a phasetype, PHτ u),m), with M = , τu) = 14
16 e 3.701u e 0.188u, e 3.701u e 0.188u, e 3.701u e 0.188u e 3.701u e 0.188u ) 0 u < b, e 3.701u 0.001e 0.188u, e 3.701u 0.012e 0.188u e 3.701u e 0.188u e 3.701u e 0.188u e 6.646u e 0.080u, e 6.646u e 0.080u, e 6.646u e 0.080u e 6.646u e 0.080u ) u b e 6.646u e 0.080u, e 6.646u e 0.080u e 6.646u e 0.080u e 6.646u e 0.080u For example, for u = 0, ψ 1 0) = , τ 0) = , , , ), F Y y) = y)e 2.5y y)e 4. 4y, α m Y) = m m )m! and for u = 3, ψ 2 3) = , τ 3) = , , , ), F Y y) = y)e 2.5y y)e 4. 4y, α m Y) = m m )m! 4. Influence of threshold) proportional reinsurance on the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs In this section, we quantify the effect on the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs of a proportional reinsurance included the threshold). It is known Drekic et al., 2004) that when the individual claim amount follows a phasetype distribution PHα,S), the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, Y, is also phasetype distributed with representation PHΠ G,S), where Π G = α +expub), ψu) with B = S + D, D = S 0 α +, S 0 = Se T being α + = λ c αs 1, in the Poisson case. We also have ψu) = α + expub)e T. Then, if the insurer uses a proportional reinsurance contract to reduce the risk, which is the effect on the probability of ruin and on the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs? Let us consider a proportional reinsurance with parameter k, 0 < k 1, such that the retained claim amount for 15
17 the insurer is XR = kx and the retained premium is λe[x]1+ρ) λe[x]1 k)1+ρ R ). We consider that the retention level k gives new positive security loading for the insurer, ρ N = ρ ρ R 1 k) k > 0, i.e., the net profit condition is always fulfilled see Castañer et al. 2007) for more details). Then, if X follows a phasetype distribution PHα,S), XR is also phasetype distributed, PH α, S k). The ruin probability with proportional reinsurance is beingbr = S k S k et PH ΠR G, S k), where ψu) = αs 1 expubr)e T αs 1 e T 1+ρ N ), αs 1. Thedeficitatruinifruinoccurs, Y, isphasetypedistributed, αs 1 e T 1+ρ N ) ΠR G = αs 1 expubr) αs 1 expubr)e T. Hence, the expectation and the variance of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs can be easily calculated: E[Y] = ΠR G ks 1 e T and V[Y] = 2ΠR G k 2 S 2 e T ΠR G ks 1 e T) 2. The Value at Risk of Y at level p, VaR p [Y] is such that F Y VaR p [Y]) = p, that is VaR p [Y] = F 1 Y p). However, there is no explicit expression for this VaR p [Y], it has to be calculated numerically the package actuar in Dutang et al. 2008) provides functions for phasetype distributions). The Tail Value at Risk of Y at level p, TVaR p [Y], can be calculated from the Value at Risk at the same level considering the following formula Cai & Li, 2005), TVaR p [Y] = VaR p [Y] ΠR GS 1 expvar p [Y] S k )et ΠR G expvar p [Y] S k )et. As an application, we develop the example that has first been used by Gerber et al. 1987) and after by Drekic et al. 2004). They consider an individual claim amount distribution that is an equal mixture of two exponentials at rates 3 and 7 respectively, with Poisson claims at rate λ = 1 and a relative security loading ρ = 0.4. In this case, X is PHα,S), where α = 0.5,0.5), S = 3 0 and B = The ruin probability is ψu) = e u +e 6u The deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, Y, is phasetype distributed, PHΠ G,S), where Π G = 42 7e 5u, ), 6+9e 5u being 48+2e 5u 48+2e 5u and F Y y) = 1 6e5u 7y +42e 5u 3y +9e 7y 7e 3y 2+48e 5u E[Y] = e 5u 21e 5u +504, V[Y] = e 2 5u) 744e 5u 441e 2 5u) e 5u
18 It is straightforward to include in the model a proportional reinsurance. Let consider a retention level k and a security loading of the reinsurer ρ R = 0.5, with 0.2 < k 1. Then, the net security loading for the insurer is ρ N = 0.5k 0.1 k. The ruin probability is ) e 5 54k+N)u k 1+15k) k 4+165k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) ψu) = 1+15k)N 4.15) being N = 4 120k +1341k 2. Figure 1 shows the behaviour of the probability of ruin as a function of u and k lefthand side plot) including the level curves in the righthand side plot. Figure 1: Ruin probability for different values of u and k The deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, Y, is phasetype distributed, PH ΠR G, S k), with ) k +N +e 2Nu k 15k k +N) ΠR G = ), k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) ) 3 2 9k +N +e 2Nu k 15k 2 2+9k +N) ) k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) and ) k k +e 2Nu k 15k k 29N) 29N E[Y] = ), k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) V[Y] = + 2k 2 84e 2Nu k 15k k +375k 2) +M 1160N +k N) ) k +5N +e 2Nu 2 k 15k k +5N) ) 2k 2 e 4Nu k 15k 2 M +1160N 3k N)) k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) ) 2, ) 17
19 being M = k 2. We consider now a threshold proportional reinsurance, that is defined by its three parameters b,k 1,k 2 ). In this case, the probability of ruin is given by 3.12), and the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs is phasetype 4 distributed see Theorem 3.4). The explicit expressions of the probability of ruin and the different measures of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs can then be easily obtained see Example 3.5 for the Erlang2, β)). Optimization problems regarding ruin probability. Which is the best strategy in order to minimize the ruin probability of the insurer? In order to answer this question we solve two optimization problems. Firstly, the insurer only considers the proportional reinsurance option. Let ψk) be the ruin probability when all the variables that influence the probability are fixed except the retention level k, min k, ψk) 4.16) 0.2 < k 1 being 4.15) the expression for the probability of ruin in this case. It can be proved that this optimum exists, but the expressions for the optimal point and the minimum value have not been included for the sake of brevity. In Table 1, we include the results of this minimization for different values of u, being k the minimum point. The expectation, the variance and the Value at Risk and the Tail Value at Risk for different levels p 0.95, 0.99 and 0.995) of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs can also be found in Table 1 for the optimal k. Table 1: Minimum probabilities of ruin with proportional reinsurance and E[Y], V[Y], VaR p[y] and TVaR p[y] u k ψk ) E[Y] V[Y] VaR 0.95 [Y] TVaR 0.95 [Y] VaR 0.99 [Y] TVaR 0.99 [Y] VaR [Y] TVaR [Y] Table 1 shows that the minimum ruin probability and the optimal retention level decrease as the initial reserves are increased. Considering that the insurer retains precisely that optimal level that minimizes the ruin probability, the measures analyzed in the table show a decrease in all cases when the initial reserves are higher. As a particular case, the results show that if the 18
20 insurer has zero initial reserves, the best option is not to reinsure k = 1) and to retain all the business this result is consistent with the one obtained in Castañer et al. 2012)). The second optimization problem appears when the insurer considers the threshold proportional reinsurance option then, 4.16) is a particular case). Let ψb,k 1,k 2 ) be the ruin probability as a function of b,k 1,k 2 ) when u is considered to be a parameter. Thus, the problem is, min b,k 1,k 2, ψb,k 1,k 2 ) 4.17) 0.2 < k 1 1, 0.2 < k 2 1 where the ruin probability is calculated with 3.12). This problem is solved numerically with the function NMinimize of the software Mathematica. Table 2 includes the optimum b,k1,k 2 ) with the corresponding minimum probability of ruin for different values of u. We have also included E[Y], V[Y], VaR p [Y] and TVaR p [Y] as in Table 1 for proportional reinsurance. Table 2: Minimum probabilities of ruin with threshold proportional reinsurance and E[Y], V[Y], VaR p[y] and TVaR p[y] u b,k1,k 2 ) ψb,k1,k 2 ) E[Y] V[Y] VaR0.95[Y] TVaR0.95[Y] VaR0.99[Y] TVaR0.99[Y] VaR0.995[Y] TVaR0.995[Y] , 1, ) , 1, ) , 1, ) , 1, ) , 1, ) , 1, ) , 1, ) In this second optimization, the results in Table 2 show that the optimal point slightly varies in spite of the increase in the initial level of reserves. However, as expected, the minimal ruin probability decreases when the initial reserves increase. At the optimal point, the behaviour of the expectation, the variance, the VaR and the TVaR is not monotone with respect to the initial reserves. All these risk measures slightly increase, from u = 0, and then slowly decrease as the initial reserves are increased. With the threshold proportional reinsurance, the insurer can always obtain a lower ruin probability than with the proportional one with a constant retention level). In Table 3, the differences of these two minimum probabilities of ruin the first one attained with proportional reinsurance and the second one attained with threshold proportional reinsurance) are shown, 19
Cover. Optimal Retentions with Ruin Probability Target in The case of Fire. Insurance in Iran
Cover Optimal Retentions with Ruin Probability Target in The case of Fire Insurance in Iran Ghadir Mahdavi Ass. Prof., ECO College of Insurance, Allameh Tabataba i University, Iran Omid Ghavibazoo MS in
More informationConditional Tail Expectations for Multivariate Phase Type Distributions
Conditional Tail Expectations for Multivariate Phase Type Distributions Jun Cai Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science University of Waterloo Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada jcai@math.uwaterloo.ca
More informationA note on the distribution of the aggregate claim amount at ruin
A note on the distribution of the aggregate claim amount at ruin Jingchao Li, David C M Dickson, Shuanming Li Centre for Actuarial Studies, Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, VIC 31, Australia
More informationSPECTRAL POLYNOMIAL ALGORITHMS FOR COMPUTING BIDIAGONAL REPRESENTATIONS FOR PHASE TYPE DISTRIBUTIONS AND MATRIXEXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS
Stochastic Models, 22:289 317, 2006 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 15326349 print/15324214 online DOI: 10.1080/15326340600649045 SPECTRAL POLYNOMIAL ALGORITHMS FOR COMPUTING BIDIAGONAL
More informationPast and present trends in aggregate claims analysis
Past and present trends in aggregate claims analysis Gordon E. Willmot Munich Re Professor of Insurance Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science University of Waterloo 1st QuebecOntario Workshop
More informationOptimal reinsurance with ruin probability target
Optimal reinsurance with ruin probability target Arthur Charpentier 7th International Workshop on Rare Event Simulation, Sept. 2008 http ://blogperso.univrennes1.fr/arthur.charpentier/ 1 Ruin, solvency
More informationAnalysis of a Production/Inventory System with Multiple Retailers
Analysis of a Production/Inventory System with Multiple Retailers Ann M. Noblesse 1, Robert N. Boute 1,2, Marc R. Lambrecht 1, Benny Van Houdt 3 1 Research Center for Operations Management, University
More information3. ARTÍCULOS DE APLICACIÓN
3. ARTÍCULOS DE APLICACIÓN SOME PROBABILITY APPLICATIONS TO THE RISK ANALYSIS IN INSURANCE THEORY Jinzhi Li College of Science Central University for Nationalities, China Shixia Ma School of Sciences Hebei
More informationFULL LIST OF REFEREED JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS Qihe Tang
FULL LIST OF REFEREED JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS Qihe Tang 87. Li, J.; Tang, Q. Interplay of insurance and financial risks in a discretetime model with strongly regular variation. Bernoulli 21 (2015), no. 3,
More informationAsymptotics of discounted aggregate claims for renewal risk model with risky investment
Appl. Math. J. Chinese Univ. 21, 25(2: 29216 Asymptotics of discounted aggregate claims for renewal risk model with risky investment JIANG Tao Abstract. Under the assumption that the claim size is subexponentially
More informationA Model of Optimum Tariff in Vehicle Fleet Insurance
A Model of Optimum Tariff in Vehicle Fleet Insurance. Bouhetala and F.Belhia and R.Salmi Statistics and Probability Department Bp, 3, ElAlia, USTHB, BabEzzouar, Alger Algeria. Summary: An approach about
More informationOn characterization of a class of convex operators for pricing insurance risks
On characterization of a class of convex operators for pricing insurance risks Marta Cardin Dept. of Applied Mathematics University of Venice email: mcardin@unive.it Graziella Pacelli Dept. of of Social
More informationStop Loss Reinsurance
Stop Loss Reinsurance Stop loss is a nonproportional type of reinsurance and works similarly to excessofloss reinsurance. While excessofloss is related to single loss amounts, either per risk or per
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationFundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics
Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics S. David Promislow York University, Toronto, Canada John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Contents Preface Notation index xiii xvii PARTI THE DETERMINISTIC MODEL 1 1 Introduction
More informationRandom Vectors and the Variance Covariance Matrix
Random Vectors and the Variance Covariance Matrix Definition 1. A random vector X is a vector (X 1, X 2,..., X p ) of jointly distributed random variables. As is customary in linear algebra, we will write
More informationA Uniform Asymptotic Estimate for Discounted Aggregate Claims with Subexponential Tails
12th International Congress on Insurance: Mathematics and Economics July 1618, 2008 A Uniform Asymptotic Estimate for Discounted Aggregate Claims with Subexponential Tails XUEMIAO HAO (Based on a joint
More informationOPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl IN A NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS
ONDERZOEKSRAPPORT NR 8904 OPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl IN A NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS BY M. VANDEBROEK & J. DHAENE D/1989/2376/5 1 IN A OPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS By Martina Vandebroek
More informationINSURANCE RISK THEORY (Problems)
INSURANCE RISK THEORY (Problems) 1 Counting random variables 1. (Lack of memory property) Let X be a geometric distributed random variable with parameter p (, 1), (X Ge (p)). Show that for all n, m =,
More informationOPTIMAL INVENTORY POLICIES UNDER STOCHASTIC PRODUCTION AND DEMAND RATES
Stochastic Models, 24:173 190, 2008 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 15326349 print/15324214 online DOI: 10.1080/15326340802016977 OPTIMAL INVENTORY POLICIES UNDER STOCHASTIC PRODUCTION AND
More informationApproximation of Aggregate Losses Using Simulation
Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 6 (3): 233239, 2010 ISSN 15493644 2010 Science Publications Approimation of Aggregate Losses Using Simulation Mohamed Amraja Mohamed, Ahmad Mahir Razali and Noriszura
More informationNonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion
Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion P. CoolenSchrijner, F.P.A. Coolen Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK email: Pauline.Schrijner@durham.ac.uk
More information1 Limiting distribution for a Markov chain
Copyright c 2009 by Karl Sigman Limiting distribution for a Markov chain In these Lecture Notes, we shall study the limiting behavior of Markov chains as time n In particular, under suitable easytocheck
More informationNonLife Insurance Mathematics
Thomas Mikosch NonLife Insurance Mathematics An Introduction with the Poisson Process Second Edition 4y Springer Contents Part I Collective Risk Models 1 The Basic Model 3 2 Models for the Claim Number
More informationIEOR 6711: Stochastic Models, I Fall 2012, Professor Whitt, Final Exam SOLUTIONS
IEOR 6711: Stochastic Models, I Fall 2012, Professor Whitt, Final Exam SOLUTIONS There are four questions, each with several parts. 1. Customers Coming to an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) (30 points)
More informationProductionInventory Systems with Lost Sales and Compound Poisson Demands
OPERATIONS RESEARCH Articles in Advance, pp. 1 16 ISSN 3364X (print) ISSN 15265463 (online) http://dx.doi.org/1.1287/opre.214.1299 214 INFORMS ProductionInventory Systems with Lost Sales and Compound
More informationDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Venice WORKING PAPER SERIES Working Paper n. 203/2010 October 2010
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Venice WORKING PAPER SERIES Antonella Campana and Paola Ferretti Initial premium, aggregate claims and distortion risk measures in X L reinsurance with
More informationOptimisation Problems in NonLife Insurance
Frankfurt, 6. Juli 2007 1 The de Finetti Problem The Optimal Strategy De Finetti s Example 2 Minimal Ruin Probabilities The HamiltonJacobiBellman Equation Two Examples 3 Optimal Dividends Dividends in
More informationA Note on the Ruin Probability in the Delayed Renewal Risk Model
Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics 2004 28: 1 5 Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics c SEAMS. 2004 A Note on the Ruin Probability in the Delayed Renewal Risk Model Chun Su Department of Statistics
More informationAsymptotics for ruin probabilities in a discretetime risk model with dependent financial and insurance risks
1 Asymptotics for ruin probabilities in a discretetime risk model with dependent financial and insurance risks Yang Yang School of Mathematics and Statistics, Nanjing Audit University School of Economics
More informationLloyd Spencer Lincoln Re
AN OVERVIEW OF THE PANJER METHOD FOR DERIVING THE AGGREGATE CLAIMS DISTRIBUTION Lloyd Spencer Lincoln Re Harry H. Panjer derives a recursive method for deriving the aggregate distribution of claims in
More informationDOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA FACULTAT D ECONOMIA I EMPRESA. Col.lecció d Economia
DOCUMENTS DE TREBALL DE LA FACULTAT D ECONOMIA I EMPRESA Col.lecció d Economia E13/89 On the nucleolus of x assignment games F. Javier Martínez de Albéniz Carles Rafels Neus Ybern F. Javier Martínez de
More informationWHY THE LONG TERM REDUCES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN SHARES. A D Wilkie, United Kingdom. Summary and Conclusions
WHY THE LONG TERM REDUCES THE RISK OF INVESTING IN SHARES A D Wilkie, United Kingdom Summary and Conclusions The question of whether a risk averse investor might be the more willing to hold shares rather
More informationheavytailed insurance claim size distribution
Bayesian estimation of ruin probabilities with heterogeneous and heavytailed insurance claim size distribution M. Concepcion Ausin Department of Mathematics University of A Coruña, Spain mausin@udc.es
More informationHealth insurance pricing in Spain: Consequences and alternatives
Health insurance pricing in Spain: Consequences and alternatives Anna Castañer, M. Mercè Claramunt and Carmen Ribas Dept. Matemàtica Econòmica, Financera i Actuarial Universitat de Barcelona Abstract For
More informationPricing American Options without Expiry Date
Pricing American Options without Expiry Date Carisa K. W. Yu Department of Applied Mathematics The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Hom, Hong Kong Email: carisa.yu@polyu.edu.hk Abstract This paper
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL OF A COMMERCIAL LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN. E.V. Grigorieva. E.N. Khailov
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Supplement Volume 2005 pp. 345 354 OPTIMAL CONTROL OF A COMMERCIAL LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN E.V. Grigorieva Department of Mathematics
More informationSPARE PARTS INVENTORY SYSTEMS UNDER AN INCREASING FAILURE RATE DEMAND INTERVAL DISTRIBUTION
SPARE PARS INVENORY SYSEMS UNDER AN INCREASING FAILURE RAE DEMAND INERVAL DISRIBUION Safa Saidane 1, M. Zied Babai 2, M. Salah Aguir 3, Ouajdi Korbaa 4 1 National School of Computer Sciences (unisia),
More informationFURTHER REVIEW OF PANJER S RECURSION FOR EVALUATION OF COMPOUND NEGATIVE BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION USING R
FURTHER REVIEW OF PANJER S RECURSION FOR EVALUATION OF COMPOUND NEGATIVE BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION USING R KUMER PIAL DAS, SHAMIM SARKER, AND NOROU DIAWARA Abstract. Panjer s recursion formula is used for
More informationLecture 2 of 4part series. Spring School on Risk Management, Insurance and Finance European University at St. Petersburg, Russia.
Principles and Lecture 2 of 4part series Capital Spring School on Risk, Insurance and Finance European University at St. Petersburg, Russia 24 April 2012 Fair Wang s University of Connecticut, USA page
More informationMATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An ndimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.
MATH10212 Linear Algebra Textbook: D. Poole, Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Thompson, 2006. ISBN 0534405967. Systems of Linear Equations Definition. An ndimensional vector is a row or a column
More informationStochastic Inventory Control
Chapter 3 Stochastic Inventory Control 1 In this chapter, we consider in much greater details certain dynamic inventory control problems of the type already encountered in section 1.3. In addition to the
More informationOn a comparison result for Markov processes
On a comparison result for Markov processes Ludger Rüschendorf University of Freiburg Abstract A comparison theorem is stated for Markov processes in polish state spaces. We consider a general class of
More informationDPolicy for a Production Inventory System with Perishable Items
Chapter 6 DPolicy for a Production Inventory System with Perishable Items 6.1 Introduction So far we were concentrating on invenory with positive (random) service time. In this chapter we concentrate
More informationNotes on Determinant
ENGG2012B Advanced Engineering Mathematics Notes on Determinant Lecturer: Kenneth Shum Lecture 918/02/2013 The determinant of a system of linear equations determines whether the solution is unique, without
More informationMath 315: Linear Algebra Solutions to Midterm Exam I
Math 35: Linear Algebra s to Midterm Exam I # Consider the following two systems of linear equations (I) ax + by = k cx + dy = l (II) ax + by = 0 cx + dy = 0 (a) Prove: If x = x, y = y and x = x 2, y =
More informationFurther Topics in Actuarial Mathematics: Premium Reserves. Matthew Mikola
Further Topics in Actuarial Mathematics: Premium Reserves Matthew Mikola April 26, 2007 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Expected Loss...................................... 2 1.2 An Overview of the Project...............................
More informationMathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces
Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 19967 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are
More informationSimilarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices
MATH022 Linear Algebra Brief lecture notes 48 Similarity and Diagonalization Similar Matrices Let A and B be n n matrices. We say that A is similar to B if there is an invertible n n matrix P such that
More informationFundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics. 3rd Edition
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2866022/ Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics. 3rd Edition Description:  Provides a comprehensive coverage of both the deterministic
More informationDeterminants. Dr. Doreen De Leon Math 152, Fall 2015
Determinants Dr. Doreen De Leon Math 52, Fall 205 Determinant of a Matrix Elementary Matrices We will first discuss matrices that can be used to produce an elementary row operation on a given matrix A.
More informationSolution. Let us write s for the policy year. Then the mortality rate during year s is q 30+s 1. q 30+s 1
Solutions to the May 213 Course MLC Examination by Krzysztof Ostaszewski, http://wwwkrzysionet, krzysio@krzysionet Copyright 213 by Krzysztof Ostaszewski All rights reserved No reproduction in any form
More informationProbability and Statistics
CHAPTER 2: RANDOM VARIABLES AND ASSOCIATED FUNCTIONS 2b  0 Probability and Statistics Kristel Van Steen, PhD 2 Montefiore Institute  Systems and Modeling GIGA  Bioinformatics ULg kristel.vansteen@ulg.ac.be
More informationUNIT 2 MATRICES  I 2.0 INTRODUCTION. Structure
UNIT 2 MATRICES  I Matrices  I Structure 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Objectives 2.2 Matrices 2.3 Operation on Matrices 2.4 Invertible Matrices 2.5 Systems of Linear Equations 2.6 Answers to Check Your Progress
More informationRunoff of the Claims Reserving Uncertainty in NonLife Insurance: A Case Study
1 Runoff of the Claims Reserving Uncertainty in NonLife Insurance: A Case Study Mario V. Wüthrich Abstract: The marketconsistent value of insurance liabilities consists of the bestestimate prediction
More informationOptimal proportional reinsurance and dividend payout for insurance companies with switching reserves
Optimal proportional reinsurance and dividend payout for insurance companies with switching reserves Abstract: This paper presents a model for an insurance company that controls its risk and dividend
More informationValuation of EquityLinked Insurance Products and Practical Issues in Equity Modeling. March 12, 2013
Valuation of EquityLinked Insurance Products and Practical Issues in Equity Modeling March 12, 2013 The University of Hong Kong (A SOA Center of Actuarial Excellence) Session 2 Valuation of EquityLinked
More informationSensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes
Sensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes Dmitry Kramkov, Carnegie Mellon University Based on a paper with Mihai Sirbu from Columbia University Math Finance Seminar,
More informationOn spare parts optimization
On spare parts optimization Krister Svanberg Optimization and Systems Theory, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden. krille@math.kth.se This manuscript deals with some mathematical optimization models for multilevel
More informationLeast Squares Estimation
Least Squares Estimation SARA A VAN DE GEER Volume 2, pp 1041 1045 in Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science ISBN13: 9780470860809 ISBN10: 0470860804 Editors Brian S Everitt & David
More informationRECURSIVE TREES. Michael Drmota. Institue of Discrete Mathematics and Geometry Vienna University of Technology, A 1040 Wien, Austria
RECURSIVE TREES Michael Drmota Institue of Discrete Mathematics and Geometry Vienna University of Technology, A 040 Wien, Austria michael.drmota@tuwien.ac.at www.dmg.tuwien.ac.at/drmota/ 2008 Enrage Topical
More informationNumerical Analysis Lecture Notes
Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes Peter J. Olver 5. Inner Products and Norms The norm of a vector is a measure of its size. Besides the familiar Euclidean norm based on the dot product, there are a number
More informationTHE CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM TORONTO
THE CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM DANIEL RÜDT UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MARCH, 2010 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Mathematical Background 3 3 The Central Limit Theorem 4 4 Examples 4 4.1 Roulette......................................
More informationEXTREMES ON THE DISCOUNTED AGGREGATE CLAIMS IN A TIME DEPENDENT RISK MODEL
EXTREMES ON THE DISCOUNTED AGGREGATE CLAIMS IN A TIME DEPENDENT RISK MODEL Alexandru V. Asimit 1 Andrei L. Badescu 2 Department of Statistics University of Toronto 100 St. George St. Toronto, Ontario,
More informationAGGREGATE CLAIMS, SOLVENCY AND REINSURANCE. David Dickson, Centre for Actuarial Studies, University of Melbourne. Cherry Bud Workshop
AGGREGATE CLAIMS, SOLVENCY AND REINSURANCE David Dickson, Centre for Actuarial Studies, University of Melbourne Cherry Bud Workshop Keio University, 27 March 2006 Basic General Insurance Risk Model where
More informationSome stability results of parameter identification in a jump diffusion model
Some stability results of parameter identification in a jump diffusion model D. Düvelmeyer Technische Universität Chemnitz, Fakultät für Mathematik, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany Abstract In this paper we discuss
More informationModern Optimization Methods for Big Data Problems MATH11146 The University of Edinburgh
Modern Optimization Methods for Big Data Problems MATH11146 The University of Edinburgh Peter Richtárik Week 3 Randomized Coordinate Descent With Arbitrary Sampling January 27, 2016 1 / 30 The Problem
More informationLoad Balancing and Switch Scheduling
EE384Y Project Final Report Load Balancing and Switch Scheduling Xiangheng Liu Department of Electrical Engineering Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305 Email: liuxh@systems.stanford.edu Abstract Load
More informationSolution Using the geometric series a/(1 r) = x=1. x=1. Problem For each of the following distributions, compute
Math 472 Homework Assignment 1 Problem 1.9.2. Let p(x) 1/2 x, x 1, 2, 3,..., zero elsewhere, be the pmf of the random variable X. Find the mgf, the mean, and the variance of X. Solution 1.9.2. Using the
More informationCONSTANTSIGN SOLUTIONS FOR A NONLINEAR NEUMANN PROBLEM INVOLVING THE DISCRETE plaplacian. Pasquale Candito and Giuseppina D Aguí
Opuscula Math. 34 no. 4 2014 683 690 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2014.34.4.683 Opuscula Mathematica CONSTANTSIGN SOLUTIONS FOR A NONLINEAR NEUMANN PROBLEM INVOLVING THE DISCRETE plaplacian Pasquale
More informationThe Demand for Life Insurance: An Application of the Economics of Uncertainty: A Comment
THE JOlJKNAL OF FINANCE VOL. XXXVII, NO 5 UECEMREK 1982 The Demand for Life Insurance: An Application of the Economics of Uncertainty: A Comment NICHOLAS ECONOMIDES* IN HIS THEORETICAL STUDY on the demand
More informationLecture 8: Random Walk vs. Brownian Motion, Binomial Model vs. LogNormal Distribution
Lecture 8: Random Walk vs. Brownian Motion, Binomial Model vs. Logormal Distribution October 4, 200 Limiting Distribution of the Scaled Random Walk Recall that we defined a scaled simple random walk last
More informationRenewal Theory. (iv) For s < t, N(t) N(s) equals the number of events in (s, t].
Renewal Theory Def. A stochastic process {N(t), t 0} is said to be a counting process if N(t) represents the total number of events that have occurred up to time t. X 1, X 2,... times between the events
More informationMarkov Chains, Stochastic Processes, and Advanced Matrix Decomposition
Markov Chains, Stochastic Processes, and Advanced Matrix Decomposition Jack Gilbert Copyright (c) 2014 Jack Gilbert. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms
More informationVERTICES OF GIVEN DEGREE IN SERIESPARALLEL GRAPHS
VERTICES OF GIVEN DEGREE IN SERIESPARALLEL GRAPHS MICHAEL DRMOTA, OMER GIMENEZ, AND MARC NOY Abstract. We show that the number of vertices of a given degree k in several kinds of seriesparallel labelled
More informationA credibility method for profitable crossselling of insurance products
Submitted to Annals of Actuarial Science manuscript 2 A credibility method for profitable crossselling of insurance products Fredrik Thuring Faculty of Actuarial Science and Insurance, Cass Business School,
More informationANALYTICAL MATHEMATICS FOR APPLICATIONS 2016 LECTURE NOTES Series
ANALYTICAL MATHEMATICS FOR APPLICATIONS 206 LECTURE NOTES 8 ISSUED 24 APRIL 206 A series is a formal sum. Series a + a 2 + a 3 + + + where { } is a sequence of real numbers. Here formal means that we don
More informationVilnius University. Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics. Gintautas Bareikis
Vilnius University Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics Gintautas Bareikis CONTENT Chapter 1. SIMPLE AND COMPOUND INTEREST 1.1 Simple interest......................................................................
More informationIntroduction to Flocking {Stochastic Matrices}
Supelec EECI Graduate School in Control Introduction to Flocking {Stochastic Matrices} A. S. Morse Yale University Gif sur  Yvette May 21, 2012 CRAIG REYNOLDS  1987 BOIDS The Lion King CRAIG REYNOLDS
More informationThe Characteristic Polynomial
Physics 116A Winter 2011 The Characteristic Polynomial 1 Coefficients of the characteristic polynomial Consider the eigenvalue problem for an n n matrix A, A v = λ v, v 0 (1) The solution to this problem
More informationMultistate transition models with actuarial applications c
Multistate transition models with actuarial applications c by James W. Daniel c Copyright 2004 by James W. Daniel Reprinted by the Casualty Actuarial Society and the Society of Actuaries by permission
More informationMATHEMATICS OF FINANCE AND INVESTMENT
MATHEMATICS OF FINANCE AND INVESTMENT G. I. FALIN Department of Probability Theory Faculty of Mechanics & Mathematics Moscow State Lomonosov University Moscow 119992 g.falin@mail.ru 2 G.I.Falin. Mathematics
More informationM/M/1 and M/M/m Queueing Systems
M/M/ and M/M/m Queueing Systems M. Veeraraghavan; March 20, 2004. Preliminaries. Kendall s notation: G/G/n/k queue G: General  can be any distribution. First letter: Arrival process; M: memoryless  exponential
More informationMaster s Theory Exam Spring 2006
Spring 2006 This exam contains 7 questions. You should attempt them all. Each question is divided into parts to help lead you through the material. You should attempt to complete as much of each problem
More informationProbability and Statistics
Probability and Statistics Syllabus for the TEMPUS SEE PhD Course (Podgorica, April 4 29, 2011) Franz Kappel 1 Institute for Mathematics and Scientific Computing University of Graz Žaneta Popeska 2 Faculty
More information4. Joint Distributions of Two Random Variables
4. Joint Distributions of Two Random Variables 4.1 Joint Distributions of Two Discrete Random Variables Suppose the discrete random variables X and Y have supports S X and S Y, respectively. The joint
More informationOLS in Matrix Form. Let y be an n 1 vector of observations on the dependent variable.
OLS in Matrix Form 1 The True Model Let X be an n k matrix where we have observations on k independent variables for n observations Since our model will usually contain a constant term, one of the columns
More informationThe Exponential Distribution
21 The Exponential Distribution From DiscreteTime to ContinuousTime: In Chapter 6 of the text we will be considering Markov processes in continuous time. In a sense, we already have a very good understanding
More information1. (First passage/hitting times/gambler s ruin problem:) Suppose that X has a discrete state space and let i be a fixed state. Let
Copyright c 2009 by Karl Sigman 1 Stopping Times 1.1 Stopping Times: Definition Given a stochastic process X = {X n : n 0}, a random time τ is a discrete random variable on the same probability space as
More informationPerformance Analysis of Computer Systems
Performance Analysis of Computer Systems Introduction to Queuing Theory Holger Brunst (holger.brunst@tudresden.de) Matthias S. Mueller (matthias.mueller@tudresden.de) Summary of Previous Lecture Simulation
More informationOPTIMIZATION AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH Vol. IV  Markov Decision Processes  Ulrich Rieder
MARKOV DECISIO PROCESSES Ulrich Rieder University of Ulm, Germany Keywords: Markov decision problem, stochastic dynamic program, total reward criteria, average reward, optimal policy, optimality equation,
More informationA Coefficient of Variation for Skewed and HeavyTailed Insurance Losses. Michael R. Powers[ 1 ] Temple University and Tsinghua University
A Coefficient of Variation for Skewed and HeavyTailed Insurance Losses Michael R. Powers[ ] Temple University and Tsinghua University Thomas Y. Powers Yale University [June 2009] Abstract We propose a
More informationNotes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory. 1 Walrasian Equilibrium and Excess Demand
Notes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory In this lecture we go on considering a general equilibrium model of a private ownership economy. In contrast to the Notes IV, we focus on positive issues such
More informationA linear algebraic method for pricing temporary life annuities
A linear algebraic method for pricing temporary life annuities P. Date (joint work with R. Mamon, L. Jalen and I.C. Wang) Department of Mathematical Sciences, Brunel University, London Outline Introduction
More informationAsymptotics for a discretetime risk model with Gammalike insurance risks. Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Asymptotics for a discretetime risk model with Gammalike insurance risks Yang Yang 1,2 and Kam C. Yuen 3 1 Department of Statistics, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, 211815, China 2 School of Economics
More informationChapter 1: The binomial asset pricing model
Chapter 1: The binomial asset pricing model Simone Calogero April 17, 2015 Contents 1 The binomial model 1 2 1+1 dimensional stock markets 4 3 Arbitrage portfolio 8 4 Implementation of the binomial model
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. GENERAL AND HISTORICAL PREFACE iii SIXTH EDITION PREFACE v PART ONE: REVIEW AND BACKGROUND MATERIAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL AND HISTORICAL PREFACE iii SIXTH EDITION PREFACE v PART ONE: REVIEW AND BACKGROUND MATERIAL CHAPTER ONE: REVIEW OF INTEREST THEORY 3 1.1 Interest Measures 3 1.2 Level Annuity
More information4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS
4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS Ben Goldys and Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2015 B. Goldys and M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 4: SinglePeriod Market
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL OF FLEXIBLE SERVERS IN TWO TANDEM QUEUES WITH OPERATING COSTS
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 22, 2008, 107 131. Printed in the U.S.A. DOI: 10.1017/S0269964808000077 OPTIMAL CONTROL OF FLEXILE SERVERS IN TWO TANDEM QUEUES WITH OPERATING
More informationOverview of Violations of the Basic Assumptions in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model
Overview of Violations of the Basic Assumptions in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model 1 September 004 A. Introduction and assumptions The classical normal linear regression model can be written
More information