Col.lecció d Economia E14/310. Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance. Anna Castañer M. Mercè Claramunt Maite Mármol


 Scot Shelton
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Col.lecció d Economia E14/310 Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance Anna Castañer M. Mercè Claramunt Maite Mármol
2 UB Economics Working Papers 2014/310 Some optimization and decision problems in proportional reinsurance Abstract: Reinsurance is one of the tools that an insurer can use to mitigate the underwriting risk and then to control its solvency. In this paper, we focus on the proportional reinsurance arrangements and we examine several optimization and decision problems of the insurer with respect to the reinsurance strategy. To this end, we use as decision tools not only the probability of ruin but also the random variable deficit at ruin if ruin occurs. The discounted penalty function Gerber & Shiu, 1998) is employed to calculate as particular cases the probability of ruin and the moments and the distribution function of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs. We consider the classical risk theory model assuming a Poisson process and an individual claim amount phasetype distributed, modified with a proportional reinsurance with a retention level that is not constant and depends on the level of the surplus. Depending on whether the initial surplus is below or above a threshold level, the discounted penalty function behaves differently. General expressions for this discounted penalty function are obtained, as well as interesting theoretical results and explicit expressions for phasetype 2 distribution. These results are applied in numerical examples of decision problems based on the probability of ruin and on different risk measures of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs the expectation, the Value at Risk and the Tail Value at Risk). JEL Codes: G22. Keywords: Deficit at ruin, GerberShiu function, Risk measures. Anna Castañer Facultat d'economia i Empresa Universitat de Barcelona M. Mercè Claramunt Facultat d'economia i Empresa Universitat de Barcelona Maite Mármol Facultat d'economia i Empresa Universitat de Barcelona Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia MICINN) for its support grant ECO C0303).. ISSN
3 1. Introduction The influence of reinsurance strategies on the solvency of the insurer is an important subject and has been widely analyzed in actuarial literature see e.g. Castañer et al. 2010, 2012), Dickson & Waters 1996) and Centeno 1986, 2002, 2005)). Several optimization problems have been considered using different kinds of reinsurance strategies, being the proportional, the excess of loss and the stoploss the most wellknown see Centeno & Simões 2009) and the references therein). One of the main measures used to control solvency is ruin probability, but in this paper we use alsoother measures related to the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, as its expectation or the Value at Risk VaR) or the Tail Value at Risk TVaR). We study the random variable deficit at ruin if ruin occurs in the classical risk theory model considering a proportional reinsurance arrangement, where the retention level is not constant and depends on the level of the surplus. This type of reinsurance, called threshold proportional reinsurance, has been first defined and studied in Castañer et al. 2010, 2012), and includes, as a particular case, the classical proportional reinsurance with constant retention level. In the classical risk theory model, the surplus, Rt), at a given time t [0, ) is defined as Rt) = u+ct St), with u = R0) 0 being the insurer s initial surplus, St) the aggregate claims and c the instantaneous premium rate. St) is modeled as a compound Poisson process St) = Nt) The claim number process {N t)} t=0 is assumed to be Poisson with parameter λ. Specifically, the corresponding claim interarrival times, denoted by {T i } are independent and identically distributed i.i.d.) exponentially distributed random variables with parameter λ, where T 1 denotes the time until the first claim and T i, for i > 1, denotes the time between the i 1)th and ith claims. The random variables {X i } are the positive claim severities, which are i.i.d. random variables with common probability density function f x) and {N t)} t=0 is independent of {X i,i 1}. We assume that the insurer s premium income is received continuously at rate c per unit time, where c = λe[x]1+ρ), and ρ > 0 is the premium loading factor. The time of ruin is T = min{t 0 Rt) < 0}, with T = if Rt) 0 for all t 0. The deficit at ruin if ruin occurs is Y = R + T) and the surplus immediately prior to ruin is R T). The probability of ultimate ruin from initial surplus u is denoted ψu) and defined by X i. ψu) = P [T < R0) = u] = E{IT < ) R0) = u}, 2
4 where IA) = 1 if A occurs and IA) = 0 otherwise. Gerber & Shiu 1998) introduced the GerberShiu discounted penalty function φu), [ φu) = E e δt w R T), R + T) ) ] IT < ) R0) = u, 1.1) being δ 0 the discounted factor, and wl,j), l 0, j > 0, the penalty function, so that φu) is the expected discounted penalty payable at ruin. This function is known to satisfy a defective renewal equation Gerber & Shiu, 1998, Li & Garrido, 2004, Willmot, 2007). This function can be used to study the traditional quantities of interest in classical ruin theory, such as ruin probability, time of ruin or deficit at ruin. Therefore, depending on the penalty function wl, j), we can obtain different interpretations for the GerberShiu function: i) For wl,j) = 1, [ ] φu) = E e δt IT < ) R0) = u, i.e. the Laplace transform of the time of ruin being δ the parameter. In addition, if we consider δ = 0, the ultimate ruin probability is obtained φu) = ψu). ii) For wl,j) = j m and m 1, φu) = E [ ] e δt j m IT < ) R0) = u, and dividing this GerberShiu function by the probability of ruin, the ordinary discounted moments of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs are obtained, α m Y) = E[ e δt j m IT < ) R0) = u ] ψu). 1.2) If we let δ = 0 in 1.2), the ordinary moments of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs are obtained. iii) For wl,j) = Ij y), φu) = E [ ] e δt Ij y)it < ) R0) = u, and dividing by the probability of ruin we obtain the distribution function of the discounted deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, F Y y) = E[ e δt Ij y)it < ) R0) = u ] ψu). 1.3) If we let δ = 0, the distribution function of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs is obtained. 3
5 The threshold proportional reinsurance strategy is a dynamic strategy with a retention level that is not constant and depends on the level of the surplus, Rt). A retention level k 1 is applied whenever the reserves are less than a threshold b 0, and a retention level k 2 is applied in the other case. Then, the premium income retained is c 1 and c 2, respectively. We consider that the retention levels give new positive security loadings for the insurer, i.e. the net profit condition is always fulfilled. Then, we can define ρ 1 = ρ R ρ R ρ k 1 factor of reinsurer. and ρ 2 = ρ R ρ R ρ k 2, being ρ R the loading The main objective of this paper is to study the effect of the threshold proportional reinsurance on the probability of ruin and on the other risk measures related with the deficit at ruin. We also perform a comparative analysis with the proportional reinsurance. Our results can assist the insurer in his reinsurance decision process concerning solvency related optimality problems in reinsurance can be found for instance in Dimitrova & Kaishev 2010), Kaishev & Dimitrova 2006) and Castañer et al. 2013)). After this introduction, the paper is organized as follows. In the next section some assumptions and some preliminaries are included. In Section 3.1, we present some general results for the GerberShiu function for the ruin probability, the ordinary moments and the distribution function of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, when the individual claim amount follows a general phasetype distribution. In Section 3.2, we assume a phasetype 2 distribution and analyzed the previous results. Then, the explicit expressions are obtained. An interesting result about the distribution of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs in a model with a threshold reinsurance is demonstrated in Theorem 3.4. In Section 4, some optimization and decision problems of the reinsurance strategy are presented. In this analysis, the ruin probability and the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs are used as decision tools for the insurer. This section includes some numerical examples. Section 5 closes the paper giving some concluding remarks. 2. Assumptions and preliminaries In this paper we analyze the deficit at ruin in the classical risk theory model assuming a compound Poisson process for the aggregate claims and a phasetype distribution for the individual claim amount, when the insurer considers a threshold proportional reinsurance. In this model with threshold proportional reinsurance strategy, the discounted penalty function 1.1) behaves differently, depending on whether initial surplus u is below or above the level b. Hence, for 4
6 notational convenience, we write φ 1 u), 0 u < b, φu) = φ 2 u), u b. In Castañer et al. 2010) a theorem for the integrodifferential equation for the GerberShiu function 1.1) is obtained in a Poisson model for the claim process. We include this theorem in order that the paper is selfcontained, taking into account that we will use it in the next sections. Theorem 2.1. The discounted penalty function φu) in a Poisson process model satisfies the integrodifferential equations φ φ 1 u), 0 u < b, u) = 2.1) φ 2 u), u b, where φ 1u) = λ+δ φ 1 u) λ u k 1 φ 1 u k 1 x)dfx) λ ξ 1 u), c 1 c 1 0 c [ 1 φ 2u) = λ+δ φ 2 u) λ u b k 2 φ 2 u k 2 x)dfx) 2.2) c 2 c 2 + u k 2 u b k 2 φ 1 u k 2 x)dfx) 0 ] λ c 2 ξ 2 u), and ξ 1 u) = wu,k 1 x u)fx)dx, ξ 2 u) = u k 1 wu,k 2 x u)fx)dx. 2.3) u k 2 Let wr T), R + T) ) be a nonnegative function of R T) > 0, the surplus immediately before ruin, and R + T) > 0 the surplus at ruin. As we focus our analysis on the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, we will consider only a specific subgroup of penalty functions WD = {wl,j) = j m,wl,j) = Ij y),wl,j) = 1} with m > 0. We assume that the individual claim amount follows a phasetype distribution P Hα, S). Key results of modern theory of phasetype distributions including theoretical properties, characterization and applications can be found in Neuts 1981, 1989), O Cinneide 1990), Latouche & Ramaswami 1999) or Asmussen 2003). Most of the original applications of phasetype distributions are in queuing theory, but these kind of distributions are widely used in risk theory 5
7 in the last years. In Asmussen & Albrecher 2010) many applications in this field can be found. Other important references on phasetype distributions in risk theory context include Asmussen & Rolski 1992), Rolski et al. 1999), Asmussen & Bladt 1996), Bladt 2005) or Drekic et al. 2004). We present a brief overview of phasetype distributions and their properties. Phasetype distributions: We consider a continuous time Markov chain with a single absorbing state 0 and N transient states. The row vector α contains the probabilities α j that the process starts in the various transient states j = 1,2,...,N. If the probability of starting the process in the absorbing state is zero, N j=1 α j = 1. Then, αe T = 1 where e T is a column vector of ones with n 1 elements. The infinitesimal generator Q for the continuous time Markov chain is given by Q = 0 0, S 0 S where S is the matrix of transition rates among the transient states and S 0 is the column vector of absorption rates into state 0 from the transient states. Necessarily, S 0 = Se T, and S is an N N matrix whose diagonal entries are negative and whose other entries are nonnegative. Under these assumptions, the distribution of time X until the process reaches the absorbing state is said to be phasetype distributed and is denoted P Hα, S) with distribution F X x) = 1 αexpsx)e T for x 0, density function f X x) = αexpsx)s 0 for x > 0 and ordinary moments α m X) = 1) m m!αs m e T, being exp ) the matrix exponential. N, The Laplace transform of the density function f X t) = 0 e tx f X x)dx is rational of degree f X t) = at) bt), with at) = N a i t i, a 0 = 0, bt) = N b i t i, b 0 = 1 and f X x) satisfies the linear differential equation i=0 i=0 N i=0 b i f i) X x) = ) The finite mixture of phasetype distributions is phasetype distributed. Let X i, i = 1,...,k distributed as PHα i,s i ), and Y = I i X i being k I i = 1, and P I i = 1) = p i then Y is PHα,S) with 6
8 S S α = p 1 α 1,...,p k α k ) and S = ) S k Phasetype distributions with N = 2 are phasetype distributions with λ αλ S =, 2.6) βµ µ where λ,µ > 0 and 0 α, β 1, αβ < 1 with a density satisfying 2.4), i.e., f x)+b 1 f x)+ b 2 f x) = 0. If b 2 < 0, the exponential distribution is obtained and all other phasetype distributions are obtained when b 2 > 0. In Dickson & Hipp 2000) it is demonstrated that any phasetype distribution with N = 2 is either an hyperexponential distribution or a linear combination of an exponential and an Erlang2) with the same scalar parameter. Then, following Dickson & Hipp 2000), a phasetype distribution with N = 2, can be always expressed in standardized form with α 1,α 2 ), S = a 1 a 2, a 1,a 2,a 4 0, being a 1 = β 1, a 4 = β 2 and a 2 = 0 for the hyperexponentialβ 0 a 4 1,β 2 )distributionanda 1 = a 2 = a 4 = β foralinearcombinationofanexponentialβ) and an Erlang2,β). It is easy to prove that the following relations are fulfilled for the standardized form, b 1 = a 1+a 4 a 1 a 4 and b 2 = 1 a 1 a 4 and that the density function using the standardized form is f x) = α 1 a 1 a 2 )e a 1x +α 2 a 4 e a 4x +α 1 a 4 a 2 xe a 1x. 3. GerberShiu function with X phasetype 2 distributed In order to find the expression of the GerberShiu function if the individual claim amount follows a phasetype distribution we first need to obtain the ordinary differential equation from the integrodifferential equation included in Theorem 2.1 and then, solve it. In this section, we present some results that are general and useful for any phasetype, the ordinary differential equation and the expression for ξ s u) for s = 1,2. Next, we obtain the explicit expression for the GerberShiu function for N = General results In Theorem 3.1, we present the ordinary differential equation for the GerberShiu function in a Poisson process model.it is general with respect the three specific expressions included in W D. 7
9 This is an important result that implies that if we are analyzing the probability of ruin or the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, the structure of the solution will be the same. Then, where is the difference? The difference is included in the expression of ξ s u) for s = 1,2. In Theorem 3.2, we present a general expression of ξ s u). Theorem 3.1. If the individual claim amount is distributed as a PHα,S) and wl,j) = wj), φu) is the solution of the ordinary differential equation, φ N+1) s u) = δ c s k N s b N ) λ+δ φ s u)+ b ) N 1 φ N) s u) c s k s b N + N 1 j=1 λ c s b N 1 k N j s N 1 h=j+1 λ c s f N 1 j) 0)+ b j 1 k s b N λ+δ)b j c s b N 3.1) b h f h j 1) 0) φ j) s u), where φ s u), s = 1,2 being s = 1 for 0 < u < b and s = 2 for u > b. The proof of Theorem 3.1 is included in Appendix A. Theorem 3.2. Let the individual claim amount X PHα,S). Then ξ s u) = H s u) G s, s = 1,2, being H s u) = 1 F Xs u)), S = S k s, X s PHα,S ) and for Z PHα, S ) and α = αexps u) H su). α m Z) if wl,j) = j m, m 1, G s = F Z y) if wl,j) = Ij y), 1 if wl,j) = 1, Proof. Taking into account 2.3), if the penalty function is equal to 1, assuming that X PHα,S) ξ s u) = u ks where S = S k s and X s PHα,S ). f X x)dx = αexps u)e T = 1 F Xs u) = H s u), 3.2) 8
10 If the penalty function is j m, then ξ s u) = = Let α = αexps u) H su), then u ks 0 ξ s u) = H s u) k s x u) m f X x)dx = z m αexps u)exps z) S e T) dz, s = 1, z m α exps z) S e T) dz, s = 1,2, z m 1 ) u+z f X dz 3.3) k s k s and taking into account that α exps z) S e T) = f Z z) being Z PHα,S ), ξ s u) = H s u) 1) m m!α S ) m e T = H s u)α m Z), s = 1,2. 3.4) If the penalty function is Ij y), ξ s u) = u+y ks u ks df X x) = 1 αexps u+y))e T 1+αexpS u)e T = αexps u)e T αexps u)exps y)e T, s = 1,2, 3.5) and considering α and H s u), ξ s u) = H s u) 1 α exps y)e T) = H s u)f Z y), s = 1,2. 3.6) 3.2. Results for N = 2 From Theorem 3.2, we derive the following corollary, that gives the expression of ξ s u), s = 1,2 assuming a PHα,S) with N = 2 expressed in standardized form. Corollary 3.3. From Theorem 3.2, if the individual claim amount is PHα,S) with N = 2 expressed in standardized form, being a i,s the elements of S = S k s, s = 1,2, For the penalty functions ξ s u) = C s) 1 e a 1,su +C s) 2 e a 4,su +C s) 3 ue a 1,su, s = 1,2. i) wl,j) = 1: C s) 1 = α 1, C s) 2 = α 2 and C s) 3 = α 1 a 2,s. m! m 1 = α 1 ii) wl,j) = j m : C s) a m 1,s +m! a 2,s a m+1 1,s a i 1,s a i 4,s ), C s) 2 = α 2 m! a m 4,s and C s) m! 3 = α 1 a 2,s a m. 4,s 9
11 iii) wl,j) = Ij y): C s) 1 = α 1 1 e a 1,sy ), C s) 2 = α 2 1 e a 4,sy ) α 1 a 2,s ye a 1,sy and C s) 3 = α 1 a 2,s 1 e a 1,sy ). Proof. Let X PHα,S), being S a matrix expressed in standardized form, and being a i,s the elements of S = S k s,s = 1,2. For wl,j) = 1, from 3.2), if we let a i,s = a i k s, ξ s u) = α 1,α 2 ) e a 1,su a 2,s ue a 1,su e T = α 1 e a1,su +α 2 e a4,su +α 1 a 2,s ue a1,su. 0 e a 4,su For wl,j) = j m, from 3.4), and substituting α = αexps u) H su), ξ s u) = m! 1) m αexps u)s ) m e T = m! 1) m α 1,α 2 ) e a 1,su a 2,s ue a 1,su 0 e a 4,su a 1,s a 2,s 0 a 4,s m e T, being then m! ξ s u) = α 1 a 1 a 2 0 a 4 a m 1,s +m! a 2,s a m+1 1,s m m = 1) m a i 1,sa i 4,s And for wl,j) = Ij y), from 3.6) and using α, ) 1 a m 1,s a 2,s a m+1 1,s m 1 0 a m 4,s a i 1,s a i 4,s, e a1,su m! +α 2 a m e a4,su m! +α 1 4,s a m a 2,s ue a1,su. 4,s ξ s u) = αexps u)e T αexps y)exps u)e T = α 1 1 e a 1,s y ) e a 1,su + α 2 1 e a 4,s y ) α 1 a 2,s ye a 1,sy ) e a 4,su + α 1 1 e a 1,s y ) a 2,s ue a 1,su. Then, the corollary is proved. Obviously, from Corollary 3.3, it is possible to obtain the particular cases included in phasetype 2 distributions. If we consider the hyperexponentialβ 1,β 2 ) distribution, a 1 = β 1, a 2 = 0 and a 4 = β 2. Then, for the penalty function equal to 1, C s) 1 = α 1, C s) 2 = α 2 and C s) 3 = 0; for the penalty function equal to j m, C s) ks 1 = α m m! 1 β m 1, C s) 2 = α 2 k m s m! β m 2 and C s) 3 = 0; and for penalty ) function equal to Ij y), C s) 1 = α 1 1 e β 1 ks ), y C s) 2 = α 2 1 e β 2 ks y and C s) 3 = 0. 10
12 If we consider a linear combination of an exponentialβ) and an Erlang2,β), a 1 = a 2 = a 4 = β. Then, for the penalty function equal to 1, C s) 1 = α 1, C s) 2 = α 2 and C s) 3 = α 1 β k s ; for the penalty function equal to j m, C s) ks 1 = α m m+1)! 1 β, C s) k m s 2 = α m m! 2 β and C s) k m s 3 = α m 1 m! 1 ; and β m 1 for the penalty function equal to Ij y), C s) 1 = α 1 1 e β y) ks, C s) 2 = α 2 1 e β y) ks α 1 β k s ye β ks y and C s) 3 = α 1 β k s 1 e β ks y). If, in addition, we consider α 1 = 1 and α 2 = 0, then we get the Erlang2, β) distribution. The exponential distribution is not a phasetype 2, but it can be obtained considering that α 1 = 0 and α 2 = 1. Once we have obtained the different expressions of ξ s u), we can solve the integrodifferential equation for the GerberShiu function. From 3.1), if N = 2, φ s u) = + λ+δ b ) 1 φ s u) 3.7) c s k s b 2 λ+δ)b1 b 0 c s k s b 2 ksb 2 λ ) f 0) φ 2 c s k su)+ δ s c s ksb 2 φ s u), 2 where φ s u), s = 1,2 being s = 1 for 0 < u < b and s = 2 for u > b. In order to solve 3.7) we obtain the characteristic equation for 0 u < b, and for u b, λ+δ r 3 b ) 1 r 2 λ+δ)b1 b 0 c 1 k 1 b 2 c 1 k 1 b 2 k1 2b λ ) f 0) r δ 2 c 1 k 1 c 1 k1 2b 2 λ+δ r 3 b ) 1 r 2 λ+δ)b1 b 0 c 2 k 2 b 2 c 2 k 2 b 2 k2 2b λ ) f 0) r δ 2 c 2 k 2 c 2 k2 2b 2 = 0, = 0, with r i, i = 1,...,6, real and distinct roots of the characteristic equations, so φ 1 u) = 3 F i e riu, 0 u < b, φu) = φ 2 u) = 6 F i e riu, u b. i=4 3.8) To obtain the ruin probability, and the moments and the deficit at ruin not their present values) we have to consider δ = 0, so r 3 = r 6 = 0. Then, to determine F i, i = 1,...,6, we need six equations. One equation is obtained from lim φu) = 0, that gives F 6 = 0. Another equation comes from the continuity condition u φ 1 u) u=b = φ 2 b). 3.9) The other four conditions are obtained substituting 3.8) in 2.2), integrating and rearranging terms, considering Corollary 3.3, and taking into account the values of a 1, a 2 and a 4. For 11
13 the hyperexponentialβ 1,β 2 ) distribution, let us define h 1 = C1) 1 α 1, h 2 = C1) 2 α 2, h 3 = C2) 1 h 4 = C2) 2 α 2, then the four equations are α 1 and β 1 5 i=4 β 2 5 i=4 F i e β 1 3 β 2 3 r i + β ) 1 b k 2 r i k 2 +β 1 +β 1 r F i e i + β 2 )b k 2 +β 2 r i k 2 +β 2 F i r i k 1 +β 1 = h 1, F i r i k 1 +β 2 = h 2, 3.10) 3 3 F i 1 e F i 1 e r i + β ) ) 1 b k 2 r i k 2 +β 1 = h 3, r i + β ) ) 2 b k 2 r i k 2 +β 2 = h 4. For the linear combination of an exponentialβ) and an Erlang2,β), let us define h 1 = C 1) 1 +C 1) 2, h 2 = C1) 3 k 1 α 1 β, h 3 = C 2) α 2 β α 1β 2 b k 2 ) 5 i=4 +α 1 β 2 3 β 5 i= C 2) 3 k 2 α 1 β 2 and h 4 = C2) α 1 F i β 2 r i k 1 +β) r i + β ) b k2 F i e r i k 2 +β +α 1 β 2 r i + F i 1 e β ) ) b k2 3, then the four equations are α 2 F i β r i k 1 +β = h 1, F i β r i k 1 +β = h 2, 3.11) 5 r i k 2 +β) 2 +α 2 β ) r F i e i + β b k2 3 r i k 2 +β +β 3 r i + β ) b r k2 F i e + α 1β 2 i + β ) b k2 b F i e r i k 2 +β) 2 k 2 r i k 2 +β i=4 r i + F i 1 e β ) ) b k2 3 r i + F i 1 e β ) ) b k2 r i k 2 +β = h 3, r i k 2 +β = h 4. Let us rewrite the linear equation system formed by 3.9) and 3.10) or 3.11) in matrix form, A F = H, being F the vector of unknowns, F = F j ) j=1,...,5, considering H the vector of independent terms H = 0,h 1,h 2,h 3,h 4 ), and A the matrix of the coefficients of the system. Solving the system we obtain F = A 1 H, so F j = 4 h i f ji, j = 1,...,5, being f ji the elements of the matrix A 1. From 3.8), φ 1 u) = 3 F i e riu = 4 h z φu) = z=1 φ 2 u) = 5 F i e riu = 4 h z i=4 z=1 3 f iz e riu = 4 h z c z u), 0 u < b, z=1 5 f iz e riu = 4 h z d z u), u b. i=4 z=1 3.12) 12
14 being c z u) = 3 f iz e riu and d z u) = 5 f iz e riu. i=4 From the definition of h z, z = 1,...,4, it is straightforward that in the ruin probability case, h z = 1. Then, from 3.12), φ 1 u) = ψ 1 u) = 4 c z u) and φ 2 u) = ψ 2 u) = 4 d z u). z=1 Theorem 3.4. The deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, Y, is distributed as a phasetype PHτ u),m) where τ u) = P1 z u)) z=1,...,4 being P1 z u) = czu) ψ 1 u) if 0 u < b, and τ u) = P2 zu)) z=1,...,4 being P2 z u) = dzu) ψ 2 u) if u b, and M = T 1 0, 0 T 2 being T s = a 1 α 1 a 2 k s k s 0 a 4 k s, s = 1,2. Proof. The distribution of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs from 1.3) and δ = 0 is F Y y) = φu) ψu). For 0 u < b, from 3.12), F Y y) = φ 1u) ψ 1 u) = 1 ψ 1 u) 4 h z c z u) = z=1 z=1 4 h z P1 z u). 3.13) Knowing the values of h z, z = 1,...,4, defined in 3.10) and 3.11), and considering the values of C s) i obtain in Corollary 3.3 for wl,j) = Ij y), substituting in 3.13), and grouping terms we ) ) F Y y) = 1 W 1 u) P11 u) W 1 u), P1 2u) W 1 u) expt 1 y)e T W 2 u) P13 u) W 2 u), P1 4u) W 2 u) expt 2 y)e T, 3.14) being Let γ = z=1 W 1 u) = P1 1 u)+p1 2 u), W 2 u) = P1 3 u)+p1 4 u), T s = a 1 k s α 1a 2 k s. 0 a 4 k s ) ) P11 u) W 1 u), P1 2u) W 1 u) and δ = P13 u) W 2 u), P1 4u) W 2 u), then 3.14) can be written as F Y y) = 1 W 1 u)γexpt 1 y)e T W 2 u)δexpt 2 y)e T. Taking into account that T s, s = 1,2 has the structure defined in 2.6), then the distribution of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs is a mixture of two phasetype distributions, Y 1 PHγ,T 1 ) 13
15 and Y 2 PHδ,T 2 ), being the weights W 1 u) and W 2 u). Then, considering that the finite mixture of a phasetype distribution is a phasetype distribution, from 2.5), the theorem for 0 u < b is proved. For u b, applying a similar process it can be demonstrated that Y PHτ u),m), with τ u) = P2 z u)) z=1,...,4. So, Y is a mixture of two phasetype distributions Y 1 PHµ,T 1 ) ) ) and Y 2 PHυ,T 2 ) with µ = P21 u) V 1 u), P2 2u) V 1 u) and υ = P23 u) V 2 u), P2 4u) V 2 u), being the weights V 1 u) = P2 1 u)+p2 2 u)) and V 2 u) = P2 3 u)+p2 4 u)). Example 3.5. As an example, we calculate the probabilities of ruin and the distribution of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs assuming a threshold reinsurance strategy with X i Erlang2,β) and the following values for the parameters β = 2, λ = 1, b = 2, k 1 = 0.8, k 2 = 0.45, ρ = 0.15, ρ R = 0.25 and δ = 0. Let us first obtain the ruin probability. We know that, in this case, the independent terms of system 3.11), h z, z = 1,...,4 are equal to one and that the matrix A 1 is A 1 = Then, we have ψ 1 u) = e u e u, ψ 2 u) = e u e u. Let us know consider the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs. From Theorem 3.4, Y is distributed as a phasetype, PHτ u),m), with M = , τu) = 14
16 e 3.701u e 0.188u, e 3.701u e 0.188u, e 3.701u e 0.188u e 3.701u e 0.188u ) 0 u < b, e 3.701u 0.001e 0.188u, e 3.701u 0.012e 0.188u e 3.701u e 0.188u e 3.701u e 0.188u e 6.646u e 0.080u, e 6.646u e 0.080u, e 6.646u e 0.080u e 6.646u e 0.080u ) u b e 6.646u e 0.080u, e 6.646u e 0.080u e 6.646u e 0.080u e 6.646u e 0.080u For example, for u = 0, ψ 1 0) = , τ 0) = , , , ), F Y y) = y)e 2.5y y)e 4. 4y, α m Y) = m m )m! and for u = 3, ψ 2 3) = , τ 3) = , , , ), F Y y) = y)e 2.5y y)e 4. 4y, α m Y) = m m )m! 4. Influence of threshold) proportional reinsurance on the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs In this section, we quantify the effect on the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs of a proportional reinsurance included the threshold). It is known Drekic et al., 2004) that when the individual claim amount follows a phasetype distribution PHα,S), the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, Y, is also phasetype distributed with representation PHΠ G,S), where Π G = α +expub), ψu) with B = S + D, D = S 0 α +, S 0 = Se T being α + = λ c αs 1, in the Poisson case. We also have ψu) = α + expub)e T. Then, if the insurer uses a proportional reinsurance contract to reduce the risk, which is the effect on the probability of ruin and on the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs? Let us consider a proportional reinsurance with parameter k, 0 < k 1, such that the retained claim amount for 15
17 the insurer is XR = kx and the retained premium is λe[x]1+ρ) λe[x]1 k)1+ρ R ). We consider that the retention level k gives new positive security loading for the insurer, ρ N = ρ ρ R 1 k) k > 0, i.e., the net profit condition is always fulfilled see Castañer et al. 2007) for more details). Then, if X follows a phasetype distribution PHα,S), XR is also phasetype distributed, PH α, S k). The ruin probability with proportional reinsurance is beingbr = S k S k et PH ΠR G, S k), where ψu) = αs 1 expubr)e T αs 1 e T 1+ρ N ), αs 1. Thedeficitatruinifruinoccurs, Y, isphasetypedistributed, αs 1 e T 1+ρ N ) ΠR G = αs 1 expubr) αs 1 expubr)e T. Hence, the expectation and the variance of the deficit at ruin if ruin occurs can be easily calculated: E[Y] = ΠR G ks 1 e T and V[Y] = 2ΠR G k 2 S 2 e T ΠR G ks 1 e T) 2. The Value at Risk of Y at level p, VaR p [Y] is such that F Y VaR p [Y]) = p, that is VaR p [Y] = F 1 Y p). However, there is no explicit expression for this VaR p [Y], it has to be calculated numerically the package actuar in Dutang et al. 2008) provides functions for phasetype distributions). The Tail Value at Risk of Y at level p, TVaR p [Y], can be calculated from the Value at Risk at the same level considering the following formula Cai & Li, 2005), TVaR p [Y] = VaR p [Y] ΠR GS 1 expvar p [Y] S k )et ΠR G expvar p [Y] S k )et. As an application, we develop the example that has first been used by Gerber et al. 1987) and after by Drekic et al. 2004). They consider an individual claim amount distribution that is an equal mixture of two exponentials at rates 3 and 7 respectively, with Poisson claims at rate λ = 1 and a relative security loading ρ = 0.4. In this case, X is PHα,S), where α = 0.5,0.5), S = 3 0 and B = The ruin probability is ψu) = e u +e 6u The deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, Y, is phasetype distributed, PHΠ G,S), where Π G = 42 7e 5u, ), 6+9e 5u being 48+2e 5u 48+2e 5u and F Y y) = 1 6e5u 7y +42e 5u 3y +9e 7y 7e 3y 2+48e 5u E[Y] = e 5u 21e 5u +504, V[Y] = e 2 5u) 744e 5u 441e 2 5u) e 5u
18 It is straightforward to include in the model a proportional reinsurance. Let consider a retention level k and a security loading of the reinsurer ρ R = 0.5, with 0.2 < k 1. Then, the net security loading for the insurer is ρ N = 0.5k 0.1 k. The ruin probability is ) e 5 54k+N)u k 1+15k) k 4+165k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) ψu) = 1+15k)N 4.15) being N = 4 120k +1341k 2. Figure 1 shows the behaviour of the probability of ruin as a function of u and k lefthand side plot) including the level curves in the righthand side plot. Figure 1: Ruin probability for different values of u and k The deficit at ruin if ruin occurs, Y, is phasetype distributed, PH ΠR G, S k), with ) k +N +e 2Nu k 15k k +N) ΠR G = ), k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) ) 3 2 9k +N +e 2Nu k 15k 2 2+9k +N) ) k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) and ) k k +e 2Nu k 15k k 29N) 29N E[Y] = ), k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) V[Y] = + 2k 2 84e 2Nu k 15k k +375k 2) +M 1160N +k N) ) k +5N +e 2Nu 2 k 15k k +5N) ) 2k 2 e 4Nu k 15k 2 M +1160N 3k N)) k +5N +e 2Nu k 15k k +5N) ) 2, ) 17
New insights on the meanvariance portfolio selection from de Finetti s suggestions. Flavio Pressacco and Paolo Serafini, Università di Udine
New insights on the meanvariance portfolio selection from de Finetti s suggestions Flavio Pressacco and Paolo Serafini, Università di Udine Abstract: In this paper we offer an alternative approach to
More informationThe mean field traveling salesman and related problems
Acta Math., 04 (00), 9 50 DOI: 0.007/s50000467 c 00 by Institut MittagLeffler. All rights reserved The mean field traveling salesman and related problems by Johan Wästlund Chalmers University of Technology
More informationOneyear reserve risk including a tail factor : closed formula and bootstrap approaches
Oneyear reserve risk including a tail factor : closed formula and bootstrap approaches Alexandre Boumezoued R&D Consultant Milliman Paris alexandre.boumezoued@milliman.com Yoboua Angoua NonLife Consultant
More informationEstadística. An Introduction to the Theory of Stochastic Orders
Boletín de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Vol. 26, No. 1, Febrero 2010, pp. 418 Estadística An Introduction to the Theory of Stochastic Orders Félix Belzunce Departamento de Estadística e Investigación
More informationLoss Reserving: Past, Present and Future
Loss reserving: past, present and future 1 G. Taylor, G. McGuire and A. Greenfield ISBN 734 2898 9 Loss Reserving: Past, Present and Future by Greg Taylor Taylor Fry Consulting Actuaries and The University
More informationBoundary Conditions For MeanReverting Square Root Process
Boundary Conditions For MeanReverting Square Root Process by Jonathan AquanAssee A research paper presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of
More informationACTUARIAL MODELING FOR INSURANCE CLAIM SEVERITY IN MOTOR COMPREHENSIVE POLICY USING INDUSTRIAL STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS
i ACTUARIAL MODELING FOR INSURANCE CLAIM SEVERITY IN MOTOR COMPREHENSIVE POLICY USING INDUSTRIAL STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS OYUGI MARGARET ACHIENG BOSOM INSURANCE BROKERS LTD P.O.BOX 7454700200 NAIROBI,
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 50, NO. 5, MAY 2005 577. Least Mean Square Algorithms With Markov RegimeSwitching Limit
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 50, NO. 5, MAY 2005 577 Least Mean Square Algorithms With Markov RegimeSwitching Limit G. George Yin, Fellow, IEEE, and Vikram Krishnamurthy, Fellow, IEEE
More informationTWO L 1 BASED NONCONVEX METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTING SPARSE MEAN REVERTING PORTFOLIOS
TWO L 1 BASED NONCONVEX METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTING SPARSE MEAN REVERTING PORTFOLIOS XIAOLONG LONG, KNUT SOLNA, AND JACK XIN Abstract. We study the problem of constructing sparse and fast mean reverting portfolios.
More informationMarkov Chains. Chapter 11. 11.1 Introduction. Specifying a Markov Chain
Chapter 11 Markov Chains 11.1 Introduction Most of our study of probability has dealt with independent trials processes. These processes are the basis of classical probability theory and much of statistics.
More informationA Googlelike Model of Road Network Dynamics and its Application to Regulation and Control
A Googlelike Model of Road Network Dynamics and its Application to Regulation and Control Emanuele Crisostomi, Steve Kirkland, Robert Shorten August, 2010 Abstract Inspired by the ability of Markov chains
More informationHow to Use Expert Advice
NICOLÒ CESABIANCHI Università di Milano, Milan, Italy YOAV FREUND AT&T Labs, Florham Park, New Jersey DAVID HAUSSLER AND DAVID P. HELMBOLD University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California
More informationA ContinuousReview Inventory Model with Disruptions at Both Supplier and Retailer
A ContinuousReview Inventory Model with isruptions at Both Supplier and Retailer Lian Qi epartment of Business Administration, Missouri University of Science and Technology 107I Fulton Hall, Rolla, MO
More informationInfinite Mean Models and the LDA for Operational Risk
Infinite Mean Models and the LDA for Operational Risk Johanna Nešlehová RiskLab, Department of Mathematics ETH Zurich Rämistrasse 101 CH8092 Zurich, Switzerland Tel.: +41 44 632 3227 email: johanna@math.ethz.ch
More informationIntroduction to Queueing Theory and Stochastic Teletraffic Models
Introduction to Queueing Theory and Stochastic Teletraffic Models Moshe Zukerman EE Department, City University of Hong Kong Copyright M. Zukerman c 2000 2015 Preface The aim of this textbook is to provide
More informationModelling the Claims Development Result for Solvency Purposes
Modelling the Claims Development Result for Solvency Purposes Michael Merz, Mario V. Wüthrich Version: June 10, 008 Abstract We assume that the claims liability process satisfies the distributionfree
More informationAN INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION OF PENSION FUNDS AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES
AN INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION OF PENSION FUNDS AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES DIRK BROEDERS, AN CHEN, AND BIRGIT KOOS Abstract. This paper analyzes two different types of annuity providers. In the first case,
More informationOPRE 6201 : 2. Simplex Method
OPRE 6201 : 2. Simplex Method 1 The Graphical Method: An Example Consider the following linear program: Max 4x 1 +3x 2 Subject to: 2x 1 +3x 2 6 (1) 3x 1 +2x 2 3 (2) 2x 2 5 (3) 2x 1 +x 2 4 (4) x 1, x 2
More informationThe Effect of Network Topology on the Spread of Epidemics
1 The Effect of Network Topology on the Spread of Epidemics A. Ganesh, L. Massoulié, D. Towsley Microsoft Research Dept. of Computer Science 7 J.J. Thomson Avenue University of Massachusetts CB3 0FB Cambridge,
More informationSubspace Pursuit for Compressive Sensing: Closing the Gap Between Performance and Complexity
Subspace Pursuit for Compressive Sensing: Closing the Gap Between Performance and Complexity Wei Dai and Olgica Milenkovic Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign
More informationTHE THEORY OF GOODDEAL PRICING IN FINANCIAL MARKETS A. CERNY, S.D. HODGES
ISSN 17446783 THE THEORY OF GOODDEAL PRICING IN FINANCIAL MARKETS A. CERNY, S.D. HODGES Tanaka Business School Discussion Papers: TBS/DP04/14 London: Tanaka Business School, 2004 The Theory of GoodDeal
More informationHow Individuals Choose Health Insurance: An Experimental Analysis +
How Individuals Choose Health Insurance: An Experimental Analysis + Arthur Schram* Joep Sonnemans CREED Amsterdam School of Economics University of Amsterdam Roetersstraat 11 1018 WB Amsterdam Email: USchram@uva.nl;
More informationWhich Free Lunch Would You Like Today, Sir?: Delta Hedging, Volatility Arbitrage and Optimal Portfolios
Which Free Lunch Would You Like Today, Sir?: Delta Hedging, Volatility Arbitrage and Optimal Portfolios Riaz Ahmad Course Director for CQF, 7city, London Paul Wilmott Wilmott Associates, London Abstract:
More informationTitle: Asset Allocation, Human Capital, and the Demand to Hold Life
Title Page: Title: Asset Allocation, Human Capital, and the Demand to Hold Life Insurance in Retirement Coauthor: Patrick Collins, Ph. D. CLU CFA Title: Adjunct Professor, Department of Economics Affiliation:
More informationA Simple Insurance Model: Optimal Coverage and Deductible
A Simple Insurance Model: Optimal overage and eductible hristopher Gaffney Adi BenIsrael Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract An insurance model, with realistic assumptions about coverage, deductible
More informationMultistate Models in Health Insurance
Multistate Models in Health Insurance Marcus Christiansen Preprint Series: 201015 Fakultät für Mathematik und Wirtschaftswissenschaften UNIVERSITÄT ULM Multistate models in health insurance Marcus C.
More informationThe Role of Commitment in Dynamic Contracts: Evidence from Life Insurance
The Role of Commitment in Dynamic Contracts: Evidence from Life Insurance Igal Hendel and Alessandro Lizzeri Abstract We use a unique data set on life insurance contracts to study the properties of long
More informationWhy a Simple Herding Model May Generate the Stylized Facts of Daily Returns: Explanation and Estimation
Why a Simple Herding Model May Generate the Stylized Facts of Daily Returns: Explanation and Estimation Reiner Franke and Frank Westerhoff Working Paper No. 83 December 2011 0 b k* B A M B AMBERG E CONOMIC
More informationThe Backpropagation Algorithm
7 The Backpropagation Algorithm 7. Learning as gradient descent We saw in the last chapter that multilayered networks are capable of computing a wider range of Boolean functions than networks with a single
More informationTO QUEUE OR NOT TO QUEUE: EQUILIBRIUM BEHAVIOR IN QUEUEING SYSTEMS
TO QUEUE OR NOT TO QUEUE: EQUILIBRIUM BEHAVIOR IN QUEUEING SYSTEMS REFAEL HASSIN Department of Statistics and Operations Research Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv 69978, Israel hassin@post.tau.ac.il MOSHE
More information