CIRCULAR LETTER 2007-20 Page 2 of 5 November 30, 2007



Similar documents
2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement.

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

ESI Consultants, Ltd. PROJECT EXPERIENCE

MEMORANDUM West Swann Avenue, Suite 225 Tampa, Florida Phone (813) Fax (813)

Stay Cable Replacement of the Luling Bridge

Earth Retaining Structures

Risk - Based Inspection Frequencies

Structure Design Manual

Review of Recent Bridge Asset Management Systems

PRELIMINARY SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR PULASKI SKYWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT. Xiaohua H. Cheng 1

BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL

INCREASE OF DURABILITY AND LIFETIME OF EXISTING BRIDGES. PIARC TC 4.4 EXPERIENCE.

Colorado Off-System Bridge Program Description and Guidelines for Selecting Bridges for Rehabilitation or Replacement Funding

Project Information. New Hope - Lambertville Toll Bridge - Pavement Rehabilitation & Approach Bridges Repairs -

IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2

3.1 Historical Considerations

Bridge Preservation Guide. Maintaining a State of Good Repair Using Cost Effective Investment Strategies

Chapter 22. Lump Sum Project Guidelines

The Rehabilitation Alternative Huey P. Long Bridge Case Study. Bruce E. Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Modjeski and Masters, Inc.

CHAPTER 4 FIELD INSPECTION, DATA COLLECTING, REPORT WRITING AND REPORT REVIEW

Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China

Project Manager & Key Staff Standards for Technical Proposals Projects using Level A and/or Level B prequalification disciplines

CONSTRUCTION OF FEDERALLY FUNDED (FEDERAL AID) LOCAL AGENCY PROJECTS BY NON-COMPETITIVE BID CONTRACT (FORCE ACCOUNT) FINAL AUGUST 2015

LIMITED SCOPE CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT REPORT

US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study

FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1

Elevated Roads for Sri Lanka

Section 8.1 Volume I QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM OF PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PRODUCTS

Bridge Type Selection

Meeting the Challenge of Pipeline Emergency Repair

Chaudière Crossing Bridge Rehabilitation

SEISMIC RETROFIT DESIGN CRITERIA

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS

National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) Metrics

The ACI 562 Repair Code

REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE MAULE EARTHQUAKE

CONCEPTUAL REHABILITATION ALTERNATIVE

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

Measuring the Condition of Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe

Current Status of Seismic Retrofitting Technology

CHAPTER 7: QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE ***DRAFT***

Public Information & Public Scoping Meeting

REHABILITATION PACKAGE 1-a

September 1, 2003 CONCRETE MANUAL CONCRETE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION

CAPPELEN MEMORIAL BRIDGE REHABILITATION

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Steel Bridges

CHAPTER 4 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

CCU Engineering Specifications. Section PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS

How to Code Load Rating of a New Bridge with No Load Rating Analysis. How to Code Load Rating of a Bridge Exempt from Load Rating Per ODOT BDM

Table of Contents 16.1 GENERAL Overview Responsibilities

Marketing Bridge Preservation UTAH Perspective

Wastewater Capital Projects Management Standard Construction Specification

Introduction to LRFD, Loads and Loads Distribution

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

Chapter 22 BRIDGE REHABILITATION NDOT STRUCTURES MANUAL

WSDOT Bridge Elements

Structural Audit of Buildings

CONCRETE REPAIR GUIDELINES. Concrete repairs can be broken down into four basic types, plus special repairs and planing.

Asset Management Plan Final Report

Stone Arch Bridges of Washington County, MD

Bridge Rehabilitation

Date: 10/10/2014 Initiated by: AAS-100

Oregon Department of Transportation s Tunnel Management and Rehabilitation Program

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge

Bridge Rehabilitation Alternatives

CULVERT AND STORM SEWER PIPE MATERIAL POLICY ON FEDERALLY FUNDED LOCAL AGENCY PROJECTS UPDATED March 2013

Historic Bridge Alternatives Analysis Layout

CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS - SEISMIC ISOLATION BEARINGS

PENNDOT e-notification

Paving Capitalization Work Categories and Treatments

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC

Page & Turnbull imagining change in historic environments through design, research, and technology

CHAPTER 2 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

OVERVIEW OF TMH19: DRAFT STANDARD FOR THE VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF ROAD STRUCTURES

ISSUE BRIEF. Understanding the Hospital Planning, Design, and Construction Process. Introduction. Background. Phase 1: Project Definition and Planning

Session 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges

How To Improve Road Quality

INDOT Long Range Plan

AASHTO Commonly-Recognized Bridge Elements

Structural Failures Cost Lives and Time

Introduction to Asset Management. Presented by: John J. Jackman, P.E. Associate - Asset Management Specialist

How To Manage The County Of Simcoe'S Infrastructure

LOAD TESTING FOR BRIDGE RATING: DEAN S MILL OVER HANNACROIS CREEK

AN IMPROVED SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR TWO-COLUMN REINFORCED CONCRETE BENTS OVER FLEXIBLE FOUNDATIONS WITH PREDEFINED DAMAGE LEVELS

ASSESSMENT AND PROPOSED STRUCTURAL REPAIR STRATEGIES FOR BRIDGE PIERS IN TAIWAN DAMAGED BY THE JI-JI EARTHQUAKE ABSTRACT

Transcription:

CIRCULAR LETTER 2007-20 PPC DECK BEAM NEW SHAPE IMPLEMENTATION, STANDARD BRIDGE PLAN RETIREMENT, AND PPC DECK BEAM INSPECTION COUNTY ENGINEERS/SUPERINTENDENTS OF HIGHWAYS MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS/DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC WORKS CONSULTING ENGINEERS The Bureau of Bridges and Structures (BBS), in response to the new Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) requirements, reviewed the adequacy of the current Precast Prestressed Concrete Deck Beam (PPCDB) designs for the new LRFD design. The existing beam shapes were found to be inadequate in shear for LRFD. Therefore, the BBS took the opportunity to not only design the PPC Deck Beams for LRFD, but also to address other known design and fabrication issues. NEW PPC DECK BEAM DESIGN ALL BRIDGE DESIGNERS MEMORANDUM 07.2 (ABD 07.2), New PPC Deck Beam Designs and Details on State System, was issued on August 29, 2007, and provides a summary of improvements, new deck beam planning and design aids, as well as an example calculation. Although ABD 07.2 indicates that it applies to the state system, much of the memorandum also applies to the local system, especially for urban structures and on high traffic volume routes that receive significant amounts of anti-icing agents. ABD 07.2 may be found at the following web link: http://www.dot.il.gov/bridges/abd072.pdf. Another ABD Memorandum is being prepared that will provide more guidance, planning and design aids for low volume local agency structures. The new PPCDB shapes will be used on the state system beginning with the June 13, 2008 state letting. To allow for an efficient and cost-effective transition to the new shapes for the industry, we encourage all local agencies to also transition at or around this date. Although not mandatory for most projects, use of the new design with the incorporated improvements is strongly recommended. In addition, LRFD design, and therefore, the new PPCDB shapes, will be required for federal-aid projects initiated after September 30, 2007 as discussed in the Bureau of Local Roads and Streets Circular Letter 2007-06, LRFD Design Implementation, dated April 30, 2007. Circular Letter 2007-06 may be found at http://www.dot.il.gov/blr/manuals/infocirculars/cl2007-06.pdf. Exceptions to the LRFD design requirement are noted in the circular letter.

Page 2 of 5 Agencies may expect some delays in delivery beyond normal delivery times during the transition to the new PPCDB shapes as the fabricators manage the retooling, modification of forms, mixes, equipment and inventory. Rehabilitations Using New PPC Deck Beam Design The new PPC Deck Beam shapes may be used on rehabilitation and beam replacement projects as the geometry is compatible with the previous shapes. Larger shear keys used in the new design will match up to the adjacent existing beams. The additional weight of the beams will be a consideration during the planning phase for reuse of the existing substructure. Additional information will be contained in a future ALL BRIDGE DESIGNERS MEMORANDUM. LRFD 1000-Year Seismic Design The LRFD design code will soon require a 1000-year design return period for seismic design, rather than the current 500-year design return period. We expect that this portion of the LRFD design code will be distributed in early 2008. The BBS will develop procedures and timelines for the implementation of the 1000-year design return period for LRFD projects. Load factor designs will continue to use the 500-year design return period. With the new 1000-year design, the structures seismic performance category or zone will now depend on the foundation soil strength, rather than just the bedrock acceleration. The new spectral accelerations and more detailed soil site class amplification will often result in a design response spectrum producing greater transverse forces on the structure, depending on the local soil conditions. Due to the significant increase in the loading and the number of variables associated with the 1000-year seismic design, the continued use of the Standard Plans for Precast Prestressed Concrete Deck Beam Bridges or Standard Bridge Plans was determined to be impractical. The use of the Standard Bridge Plans will, therefore, be phased out. This will require the use of custom plans, sealed by an Illinois Licensed Structural Engineer. In order to alleviate the impact of the retirement of the Standard Bridge Plans, we recommend the use of the CADD libraries for base sheets and details. In addition, the BBS will provide design examples with simplified design procedures. Suggested guidelines are presented in the following section, subject to the timeline for implementation of the 1000-year seismic design. STANDARD BRIDGE PLAN RETIREMENT The Standard Bridge Plans will be available for use for a limited time. However, with the conversion to the new PPCDB shapes, in order to use the Standard Bridge Plans, they must be modified. New superstructure sheets must be used, and the substructure design and pile loads reviewed and modified as necessary.

Page 3 of 5 Various transition scenarios are based on funding, who the Structural Engineer of Record is (BBS, consultant, or other), timeframe, seismic code, etc. The following is provided as clarification on projects with letting in June on the cusp of the scenarios: Local Agency PPCDB Projects to be Let Before June 2008 1. All projects initiated before September 30, 2007 - Standard Bridge Plans and Custom Designs Status Quo: Use current LFD, current PPCDB details and 500-year seismic design. 2. Federal-aid projects initiated after September 30, 2007 - Custom Designs Use LRFD, new PPCDB details and 500-year seismic design. (Anticipate few, if any in this category.) 3. Federal-aid project initiated after September 30, 2007 - Standard Bridge Plans LFD not applicable or allowed. 4. State- or locally-funded projects Initiated after September 30, 2007 - Standard Bridge Plans and Custom Designs Status Quo: Use current LFD, current PPCDB details and 500-year seismic design. Local Agency PPCDB Projects to be Let After June 2008 1. All Projects using Standard Bridge Plans with a Foundation/Pile Design by BBS Use current LFD, new PPCDB details and 500-year seismic design. The Bureau of Bridges and Structures will provide new PPCDB superstructure sheets, substructure sheets (if necessary), and pile/geotechnical recommendation. For projects already approved, send a request through the district BLRS to the Local Bridge Unit. Include a proposed letting date and General Plan & Elevation sheet. If the approval was some time ago, we may also require a copy of the approved Preliminary Bridge Design and Hydraulic Report with Borings. (We will let you know after receipt of original submittal.) 2. All Projects using Custom Plans, or Standard Bridge Plans with a Foundation/Pile Design by Consultant/Others Use current LFD, new PPCDB details and 500-year seismic design. The Structural Engineer of record should prepare new PPCDB base sheets, substructure sheets (if required), and pile/geotechnical recommendations. If preliminary bridge design has already been approved by the BBS, please advise the Local Bridge Unit of the change, along with the proposed letting date, through the district BLRS.

Page 4 of 5 Exceptions: 3. Federal-aid projects initiated after September 30, 2007 - Custom Designs Use LRFD; new PPCDB details and 500-year seismic design. 4. If Custom Designs are performed by BBS, they will be by LRFD. We ask that requests and submittal of Standard Bridge Plans to the BBS for rework to the new PPC Deck Beams (including plans on the shelf) be provided no later than June 30, 2008. However, the Standard Bridge Plans will be available for consultant rework until a date is set for full implementation of LRFD and the 1000-year design return period for seismic design. PPC DECK BEAM INSPECTION Proper inspection of PPC Deck Beams is imperative to discovery of deficiencies. In the past, the inspection of PPC Deck Beams has been primarily visual, and often from some distance. Research and experience has led to a more critical evaluation of in-service PPC Deck Beams. Please reference Circular Letter 2004-13, Inspection and Rating of PPC Deck Beam Bridges at http://www.dot.il.gov/blr/manuals/cl2004-13.pdf. Sounding and removal of delaminated concrete is essential to proper inspection and, when deficiencies are found, rating of the beams for load capacity. When this policy was initiated on the state system, it was not uncommon for a structure previously inspected visually to have the superstructure condition rating drop from 7 or 6 (Good or Satisfactory) to 4 or 3 (Poor or Serious). Condition ratings for PPC Deck Beams are provided in the Illinois Structure Information and Procedure Manual, starting on page 140, at http://www.dot.il.gov/isis/pdf/s59.pdf. Removal of delaminated concrete should be done as part of the routine NBI Inspection, and MUST BE DONE BEFORE inspection by the Local Bridge Unit (LBU). This may require use of a ladder or snooper to access the beams for a hands-on inspection. The LBU typically does not have the equipment and resources to perform this function. Repeat trips to a structure delay the structural evaluation and potentially necessary postings and uses valuable staff time. Evaluation/Prioritization for Inspection Resources In order to evaluate and prioritize the inspection resources, such as for personnel, time, traffic control, equipment, and snoopers, we suggest that local agencies incorporate a screening process when planning their inspection work. Decisions may be based on the age and location of the structure, traffic volume, history, inspection photographs, lack of drain holes in the beams, use of de-icing agents, and brief field visits. Accessibility is also often affected by the time of year when the work is performed. It is advisable to include a listing of resources required and other information pertinent to the inspections in the structure file for each structure.

Page 5 of 5 Beams Exposed to Deicing Agents. Beams that only have one layer of prestressing strands do not have reserve capacity and may be of particular concern for deteriorated beams. Issues such as ADT/importance, age of structure, previous inspection history and equipment needs may be considered. Beams Not Exposed to Deicing Agents. The extent of inspection for locations not exposed to de-icing agents could be based on defects observed during a routine inspection, such as shear key deterioration/leakage, longitudinal cracks, spalling, exposed steel, etc. As a general rule, if numerous defects can be observed visually, significant deterioration may be uncovered during a hands-on inspection. If you have any questions regarding this Circular Letter, please contact Mr. Jim Klein at (217) 782-5928 or james.klein@illinois.gov. Ralph E. Anderson, P.E., S.E. Engineer of Bridges and Structures Charles J. Ingersoll, P.E. Engineer of Local Roads and Streets cc: FHWA, Illinois Division, Attn: Dan Brydl Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Attn: Gary Iles Illinois State Toll Highway Authority Township Officials of Illinois, Attn: Bryan Smith Township Highway Commissioners of Illinois, Attn: Ron Johnson (St. Charles Township, Kane County)