Section 19. Basin-wide Mitigation Action Plans



Similar documents
TROPICAL STORM ALLISON. Prepared by: John P. Ivey, PE, CFM Halff Associates, Inc. ASCE

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Post-Flood Assessment

Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.

Hydrologic Engineering Techniques for Regional Water Resources Planning

Anchorage All-Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2004

Table of Contents ESF

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

CRS 610 Ventura County Flood Warning System Website

ANNEX P HAZARD MITIGATION

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

Chapter 6: Mitigation Strategies

Emergency Management is responsible for coordinating the City of Houston s preparation for and response to emergency situations.

City of London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy Dealing with Extreme Rainfall Events

Standard Operating Procedures for Flood Preparation and Response

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Harris County Flood Control District. Policy, Criteria, and Procedure Manual

TABLE OF CONTENTS. This document was prepared by. URS Group, Inc. 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD In Association with:

Methods for Determination of Safe Yield and Compensation Water from Storage Reservoirs

The City of Ottawa Flood Hazards

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

Community RiskMAP Questionnaire

Flood Emergency Response Planning: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster RIC005

7.0 Stream Restoration

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

LR 314 Working Group 5 Final Report

Flood mitigation program for Gatun lake. Programa de mitigación de inundaciones del lago Gatún

CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet

Probability Magnitude/Severity Warning Time Duration CPRI Flood

DISTRICT VALUES STATEMENTS, GOALS, ACTION ITEMS, AND ONGOING TASKS FOR 2015 Adopted by the Board of Directors December 10, Values Statements.

St. Vrain Watershed Master Plan Thursday, January 23 10:00 a.m. 12:15 p.m.

Cabarrus County Floodplain Information TABLE OF CONTENTS

HAZARD VULNERABILITY & RISK ASSESSMENT

Liquid Capital. Cochran s Creek: A Case Study in Stream Mitigation Banking in Georgia

9.1. Adequacy of Available Data and Monitoring Efforts

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Norfolk Flooding Strategy Update. Presentation to Norfolk City Council March 27, 2012

Association of State Flood Managers Annual Conference Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Chapter 6. Emergency Services

National Dam Safety Program Technical Seminar #22. When is Flood Inundation Mapping Not Applicable for Forecasting

Flood Checklist ACTION TO BE TAKEN BEFORE THE FLOOD SEASON

Flood Mitigation in the NYC West-of-Hudson Watershed A guide to Programs, Agencies and Funding Sources for Municipalities and Property Owners

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

PUASES013A Undertake storm and water damage operations performed at heights

Appendix F Benefit-Cost Analysis of Flood Protection Measures

The Hydrologic Engineering Center Training Course on

Town of Amherst Flood Plan Annex

A Flood Warning System for City of Findlay, Ohio

Town of Ocean City, Maryland

Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

Presentation Program Outline

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

Agua Hedionda Creek Flood Plain Information; Department of Army, Los Angeles District,

INFORMATION BULLETIN BUSINESS FLOOD PLANNING AND MITIGATION GUIDE ACE GLOBAL RISK ENGINEERING. Flood risk assessment. Introduction

(Adopted July 26, 2005 Resolution No ) Prepared by: Kevin Marstall, PE, Senior Civil Engineer, CRS Coordinator

Emergency Support Function 14. Recovery

Policy Clarifications on the Eligibility of Water and Wastewater Utility Projects for FEMA s Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants

Management of flooding downstream of dams

El Nino in the OC. Orange County Sheriff s Department Emergency Management Division

King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction

Emergency Support Function 14 Long-Term Community Recovery and Mitigation

Section 6 Benefit-Cost Analysis

Pennsylvania Flood Safety Awareness Week March 6-10th, 2015

Flooding Fast Facts. flooding), seismic events (tsunami) or large landslides (sometime also called tsunami).

John Keel, CPA State Auditor. An Audit Report on The Dam Safety Program at the Commission on Environmental Quality. May 2008 Report No.

Animals in Disasters

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY AND

Tookany Creek Flood Damage Reduction Feasibility Study Section 205 Continuing Authorities Program

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

BASIC PLAN: Appendix 7 Disaster Recovery

APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SURVEY RESULTS

Transcription:

Section 19. Basin-wide Mitigation Action Plans This Mitigation Plan identifies twelve specific hazards that could affect the Basin. Section 20 of this Plan set forth mitigation action plans to be carried out by individual jurisdictions to reduce the risks to these hazards. This section includes twelve mitigation actions to be taken collectively by the jurisdictions in concert with the. These are followed by actions to be undertaken specifically by the. Basin-wide actions are those that have been or will be taken by, or will affect, all Guadalupe River Basin communities rather than just a single jurisdiction. Section 20 includes mitigation actions and mitigation action plans of the individual jurisdictions that are participating in the planning process. Some of the basin-wide actions in this section are directed at reducing the risk from a single hazard, such as flooding. Other actions pertain to multiple hazards or all twelve hazards. These twelve hazards differ in important ways, such as in their predictability, length of warning time, speed of onset, magnitude, scope, duration of impact, and the possibilities of secondary impacts. Many of the demands on the emergency management infrastructure they generate, however, arise not from their differences but from their commonalities. The basin-wide mitigation actions are identified below, in priority order, with the highest priority actions appearing first. These are followed by the GBRA actions, which are not in priority order. Appendix B contains detailed information about grant funds that may be available to support implementation of the mitigation actions. Collective Actions Listed below are basin-wide hazard mitigation actions to be undertaken collectively by the jurisdictions and GBRA. These are intended to be actions for all jurisdictions to consider pursuing collectively and may be dependent upon the availability of funds. 1. Pursue GIS-based hazard information, including: flood hazard areas; the location of low-water crossings; and, Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-1 Protecting the Region Against All s

National Insurance Program policies, claims and losses, including repetitive losses. 2. Explore the feasibility of the serving as a Cooperating Technical Partner of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in flood mapping. 3. Develop criteria to identify and prioritize basin-wide flood hazard mapping needs. 4. Educate the public on the risks they face from natural and man-caused hazards and steps they can take to protect themselves, their families and their livelihoods. 5. As funding becomes available and with the assistance of the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, undertake a feasibility study to thoroughly assess the needs, problems and opportunities for flood damage reduction in the Guadalupe River Basin. 6. Initiate a campaign to increase the awareness and level of participation in the National Insurance Program. 7. Establish a mechanism through which local governments can share common basin-wide concerns regarding flooding and other hazards in the Guadalupe River Basin. 8. Encourage communities to participate in the Community Rating System. 9. Promote disaster-resistant building, for example: tornado safe rooms; hail resistant roofs; steel connectors; and consideration of the 2003 International Building Code. 10. Make available model floodplain management ordinances and permitting systems developed by outside s as samples for consideration by local governments. 11. Identify sites where stream gages need to be added or upgraded, explore funding options and coordinate installation requests with GBRA and the U.S.G.S. 12. Explore the potential for formal adoption of mutual aid agreements between jurisdictions for all-hazards assistance. Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-2 Protecting the Region Against All s

GBRA Mitigation Actions Conduct an annual workshop with the National Weather Service (NWS) for the County EMCs and plain Administrators within the GBRA tencounty district The Guadalupe River basin has experienced numerous flooding since the 1930 s. On an average, the Guadalupe River records a flood event every 5 years. The annual workshop will allow an exchange of information and help improve the understanding of the hydrology within the Guadalupe River basin. The workshop will also foster better communications between counties and the NWS. Estimated cost Responsible Funding sources $1000/per year GBRA and NWS Ongoing General Funds 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 and 2.3 Continue to participate in the funding of Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the COE Cibolo Watershed Study The COE completed a reconnaissance study in 2001 for the Guadalupe River Basin. The Cibolo Creek Watershed study was one of several studies recommended for further analysis. Study participants include GBRA, San Antonio River Authority (SARA) and the San Antonio Water Systems Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-3 Protecting the Region Against All s

(SAWS). Phase 1 of the study has been completed. The Study goals are to examine ways to reduce flooding in the upper watershed as well as examine recharge and ecosystem restoration potential. Estimated cost $300,000 Responsible COE, GBRA, SARA and SAWS 2007 Funding sources General Funds 2.2, 3.1 Estimated cost Responsible Funding sources Continue Weather-Net Program with the National Weather Service (NWS) Communication problems are common during major flood events. In the last few years, GBRA has worked with the NWS to develop alternate methods of sending out river forecasts. Today GBRA gathers flood stage forecasts from the NWS and provides a river summary to the EMC s and other emergency management personnel within the Guadalupe River Basin. The program is called the Weather-Net Program. The GBRA river summary provides the EMC s with an overview of river flooding. $10,000/year GBRA Engineering Department Ongoing General Funds 4.1, 4.2 Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-4 Protecting the Region Against All s

Outfit a portable emergency electric generator to provide temporary electric power at water and wastewater treatment plants All hazards GBRA has recently purchased a used 700 Kwatt generator. The unit needs to be refurbished and mounted on a trailer. During a power outage, the generator can be driven to the site and temporarily tied into the plant electric grid until normal service is restored. Very Estimated cost $15,000 Responsible GBRA Operation Department 2005 Funding sources General Funds 4.4 Work with FEMA s Engineering consultant to upgrade river models within Guadalupe County FEMA is presently updating the floodplain models in Guadalupe County. Halff Associates has been hired by FEMA to develop the models for the area between New Braunfels and Seguin. The Guadalupe River in this area includes four small lakes. GBRA has acquired an instrument that can be attached to a boat and will provide accurate cross sectional data on the lakes. The lake sounding data will help the FEMA contractor provide a more accurate hydraulic model. Estimated cost $5,000 Responsible GBRA Engineering Department 2004 completion Mitigation date in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-5 Protecting the Region Against All s

Funding sources General Funds 3.1 Participate with the Corps of Engineers (COE) on a Feasibility Study in the lower Guadalupe River Basin The lower reach of the Guadalupe River experiences extended periods of flooding. The COE in their reconnaissance study identified the lower Guadalupe river as an area for further study. The study will examine potential flood reduction projects. Estimated cost $350,000 Responsible GBRA Engineering Department 2004 Funding sources General Funds 5.2 Conduct an biennial review of the GBRA Heavy Rainfall and Response Manual During flood events in the Seguin/New Braunfels area, GBRA activates a flood response team to handle the hundreds of calls that come from the general public. The Authority has developed a manual that contains data on past floods and other relevant information to assist team members. The Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-6 Protecting the Region Against All s

document is reviewed at least every two years. Estimated cost Responsible Funding sources The manual allows GBRA to respond in a professional manner and provides needed information to the public. A biennial review is a necessary component to ensure the document is up to date. $5,000/year GBRA Engineering Department and Project Development Dept. 2004 General Funds 3.2, 4.1 Conduct an annual review of the Hurricane Preparedness Plan for GBRA s lower basin operations /Hurricane During a hurricane event, keeping water and wasterwater facilities in operation is critical. Developing a hurricane preparedness plan and maintaining the plan is an important part of the process. GBRA has developed plans for its lower basin operations An annual review will ensure the plan is kept up to date. Estimated cost $2,000/year Responsible GBRA Operations Division Each year Funding sources Plant Operating Budget obj. 1.2 Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-7 Protecting the Region Against All s

Work with Texas Department of Transportation to stabilize erosion upstream of Hwy 59 Bridge over the Guadalupe River /Hurricane The Guadalupe River at the Hwy 59 bridge near Victoria has experienced severe erosion on the eastern bank. Continued erosion may jeopardize the bridge in the next 5 to 10 years. If the erosion is not checked in the next 30 to 40 years, the Victoria Wastewater Treatment plant may also experience problems since the plant is not far from the bridge. way 59 is a major transportation route for South Texas and must be keep open. Estimated cost $20,000 Responsible GBRA Operations Division 2008 Funding sources Plant Operating Budget 5.2 Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-8 Protecting the Region Against All s

Evaluate alternatives and implement modifications to the spillgates at the TP-4 Dam in Seguin, in order to prevent recurring damage during severe floods. During the past five years, three major floods have caused damage to the spillgates at the TP-4 dam. The total cost of repairs for the first two floods was $990,140. The repairs from the 2004 flood are estimated to be approximately $390,000. During severe floods, the operational reliability of the TP-4 dam will be improved and repair costs will be eliminated. Estimated cost $1,000,000. Responsible GBRA Operations Department 2008 Funding sources General Funds and grant funds 4.4 Mitigation in the Guadalupe River Basin -- Page 19-9 Protecting the Region Against All s