CZECH HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Central Forecasting Office. Drought information



Similar documents
Drought in the Czech Republic in 2015 A preliminary summary

Elbe flood in 2002 and 2006 in terms of emergency management

FLOODS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN JUNE

PROTECTION AGAINST FLOODS

Transboundary cooperation in the flood forecasting and warning service within the international Morava river basin

MONITORING OF DROUGHT ON THE CHMI WEBSITE

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

Current HFS office procedures at CHMI

Armenian State Hydrometeorological and Monitoring Service

Standardized Runoff Index (SRI)

Climate Extremes Research: Recent Findings and New Direc8ons

Damage Assessment in a large River Basin The Mekong Experience. Phan Nguyen& Anthony Green Mekong River Commission

Surface water flood forecasting and guidance in the UK: theory, performance and outlook" RainGain National Observers Group (NOG) Meeting 16 April 2013

Image source: Visual Data Analytics, LLC

AZ EGER-PATAK HIDROLÓGIAI VIZSGÁLATA, A FELSZÍNI VÍZKÉSZLETEK VÁRHATÓ VÁLTOZÁSÁBÓL ADÓDÓ MÓDOSULÁSOK AZ ÉGHAJLATVÁLTOZÁS HATÁSÁRA

DESWAT project (Destructive Water Abatement and Control of Water Disasters)

Flash Flood Guidance Systems

The Caribbean Drought and Precipitation Monitoring Network: The Concept and its Progress

Estimating Potential Reduction Flood Benefits of Restored Wetlands

Weather Help - NEXRAD Radar Maps. Base Reflectivity

Lecture 4: Streamflow and Stream Gauging

Mortgage lending and flood insurance in Poland

Real Time Flood Alert System (RTFAS) for Puerto Rico

Hydrologic Modeling using HEC-HMS

CLIMATE, WATER & LIVING PATTERNS THINGS

Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management. Texas State Operations Center

isbn / Recommended citation for the full chapter:

Drought Decision-Support Tools: Introducing the Agricultural Reference Index for Drought ARID 1

CLIMATE CHANGE RISK ASSESSMENT

Latin American and Caribbean Flood and Drought Monitor Tutorial Last Updated: November 2014

How To Assess The Vulnerability Of The Neman River To Climate Change


What is Drought? Why is Drought Important? NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MAY 2008

Managing Drought Risk in a Changing Climate: The Role of National Drought Policy

Bezdružice (Rokycany), ca. 1 km N of the village, along the road,

Real-time Global Flood Monitoring and Forecasting using an Enhanced Land Surface Model with Satellite and NWP model based Precipitation

Application of global 1-degree data sets to simulate runoff from MOPEX experimental river basins

Burnt River Black River and Gull River Flood Contingency Plan

P3 LIBEREC WAREHOUSE SPACE AVAILABLE & 7,400 M 2 BTS OPPORTUNITIES

Monitoring Soil Moisture from Space. Dr. Heather McNairn Science and Technology Branch Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Preliminary advances in Climate Risk Management in China Meteorological Administration

EFAS European Flood Awareness System

Drought conditions and management strategies in Serbia

Heavy Rainfall from Hurricane Connie August 1955 By Michael Kozar and Richard Grumm National Weather Service, State College, PA 16803

Fort Dodge Stormwater Master Planning. Prepared By: Ralph C. Stark, Jr., P.E., C.F.M. Joel N. Krause, P.E., C.F.M.

Improved Warnings for Natural Hazards: A Prototype System for Southern California

6. Base your answer to the following question on the graph below, which shows the average monthly temperature of two cities A and B.

[ Climate Data Collection and Forecasting Element ] An Advanced Monitoring Network In Support of the FloodER Program

Monsoon Variability and Extreme Weather Events

8.5 Comparing Canadian Climates (Lab)

Geography affects climate.

Drought Monitoring and Forecasting in Sub-Saharan African. Justin Sheffield Princeton University

FLOOD FORECASTING PRACTICE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Precipitation Monitoring Network:

Risk and vulnerability assessment of the build environment in a dynamic changing society

Climate, Drought, and Change Michael Anderson State Climatologist. Managing Drought Public Policy Institute of California January 12, 2015

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

Emergency Management Service. early warning FLOOD AND FIRE ALERTS. Space

Climate, water and renewable energy in the Nordic countries

CRS 610 Ventura County Flood Warning System Website

CGC1D1: Interactions in the Physical Environment Factors that Affect Climate

Fire Weather Index: from high resolution climatology to Climate Change impact study

River Flood Damage Assessment using IKONOS images, Segmentation Algorithms & Flood Simulation Models

3D Model of Carbon Relief in the Czech Part of Upper Silesian Coal Basin

EU China River Basin Management Programme

Forest Watershed Tree Thinning Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring in the Manzano Mountains of New Mexico

Flood After Fire Fact Sheet

Use of numerical weather forecast predictions in soil moisture modelling

HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL AND MONITORING SERVICE

Weather, Climate and Water Services for the Least Developed Countries

Examples of Flash Flood Products

Water Management in Cuba: Problems, Perspectives, Challenges and the Role of the Cuban Academy of Sciences

Nowcasting: analysis and up to 6 hours forecast


Synoptic assessment of AMV errors

Modelling the Discharge Rate and the Ground Settlement produced by the Tunnel Boring

7.0 Stream Restoration

Applying MIKE SHE to define the influence of rewetting on floods in Flanders

New challenges of water resources management: Title the future role of CHy

Transcription:

Issued: 8-AUG-2008 CZECH HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Central Forecasting Office Drought information July 2008 was normal in the meaning of average temperature (+0,7 C above normal) as well as precipitation (1 % below normal) in the Czech Republic. However more precipitation has occurred in the eastern part of the area. Majority of precipitation events were connected to thunderstorms. That means that its spatial extent was usually relatively small and its duration was rather short. That kind of precipitation is not suitable for infiltration and underground water recharge. Precipitation caused temporal increase of water levels of streams in Odra river and Bečva river basins, while water levels of other streams in the Czech Republic were stable or slowly decreased. However due to precipitation a top soil moisture generally did not reach critical values of drought risk (fig.1) and wild fire risk (fig.2) except southern Moravia, eastern Bohemia and some areas in central Bohemia. Fig. 1 Drougth risk: 1 very low, 2 - low, 3 - moderate, 4 - high, 5 very high. Composite result of soil moisture measurement, computed soil water balance and evapotranspiranspiration balance.

Fig. 2 Wild fires risk: 1 very low, 2 - low, 3 - moderate, 4 - high, 5 very high. Surface streams and rivers discharges equal mostly to 20-50 % of long time average for August (Q VIII ). Mountainous rivers and streams have 50-80 % Q VIII. On the other hand some smaller lowland and middle altitudes streams in Bohemia discharge correspond only to 5-20 % Q VIII. Orlice river basin, Výrovka river, lower Cidlina River, Lomnice river, Skalice river and other could be named as examples. Value of so called Q 355 is considered to be drought threshold for river discharge. Q 355 represents about 3-5 % of historically lowest observations. Rivers below that threshold are indicated by white circle on the web presentation of CHMI (http://hydro.chmi.cz/hpps), fig.3 and table 1. Fig. 3 White dots indicate water gauges bellow the threshold for drought.

Tab. 1 water gauges bellow the threshold for drought ---------------------------------------------- RIVER WATER GAUGE LEVEL DISCHARGE N/M ---------------------------------------------- LABE JAROMER 69 4.60 355 METUJE KRCIN 16 1.22 355 D.ORLICE KOSTELEC no 16 1.32 364 TREBOVKA HYLVATY 24 0.19 355 T.ORLICE CERMNA no 11 0.65 365 ORLICE TYNISTE no 50 3.48 364 DEDINA CHABORY 19 0.07 365 DEDINA MITROV 14 0.07 365 CHRUDIMKA SVIDNICE 10 0.54 355 CHRUDIMKA NEMOSICE 38 0.84 355 DOUBRAVA ZLEBY 19 0.20 355 CIDLINA SANY 5 0.12 364 MRLINA VESTEC 4 0.07 364 VYROVKA PLANANY 10 0.01 365 JIZERKA D.STEPANICE 70 0.19 355 JIZERA ZELEZ. BROD 105 4.08 355 JIZERA PREDMERICE 116 6.64 355 LABE BRANDYS nl 127 27.00 355 NEZARKA RODVINOV 14 0.37 355 NEZARKA LASENICE 32 0.73 355 LUZNICE KLENOVICE 19 3.50 355 OTAVA SUSICE 24 3.36 355 BLANICE HERMAN 17 1.11 355 OTAVA PISEK 44 4.82 364 LOMNICE D. OSTROVEC 32 0.02 364 SKALICE VARVAZOV 60 0.06 364 KOCABA STECHOVICE 31 0.05 364 SAZAVA ZRUC ns 57 1.76 355 ZELIVKA SOUTICE 21 0.73 364 BLANICE RADONICE 99 0.38 355 SAZAVA NESPEKY 38 4.15 355 MZE STRIBRO 41 1.47 355 UTERSKY P TRPISTY 2 0.01 365 RADBUZA CESKE UDOLI 16 1.20 355 USLAVA KOTEROV 11 0.24 364 KLABAVA NOVA HUT 25 0.34 355 LITAVKA BEROUN 29 0.38 355 ODRAVA JESENICE 37 0.79 355 SVATAVA SVATAVA 21 0.93 355 TEPLA BREZOVA 6 0.38 355 PLOUCNICE BENESOV np 67 1.60 365 LUZ.NISA LIBEREC 25 0.49 355 SMEDA FRYDLANT 16 0.66 355 MORAVA MORAVICANY 83 4.90 355 ROMZE STRAZISKO 2 355 DREVNICE ZLIN 20 0.30 355 MOR.DYJE JANOV 23 0.20 355 JIHLAVA DVORCE 16 0.43 355 JIHLAVA PTACOV 55 1.20 355 OSLAVA OSLAVANY 64 0.62 355 DYJE NOVE MLYNY 249 12.00 355 Lower Elbe water level is bellow the limit for full navigation (275 cm) between Usti nad Labem and Czech-German border since May (fig.4). Recent water levels are between 140 and 145 cm. That means maximal possible ship sink of 80 85 cm not enabling economical operation of navigation.

3 vodní stav v Ústí nad Labem (m) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 30.4.2008 0:00 5.5.2008 0:00 10.5.2008 0:00 15.5.2008 0:00 20.5.2008 0:00 25.5.2008 0:00 30.5.2008 0:00 4.6.2008 0:00 9.6.2008 0:00 14.6.2008 0:00 19.6.2008 0:00 24.6.2008 0:00 29.6.2008 0:00 4.7.2008 0:00 9.7.2008 0:00 14.7.2008 0:00 19.7.2008 0:00 24.7.2008 0:00 29.7.2008 0:00 3.8.2008 0:00 8.8.2008 0:00 HLADINA LIMIT PLNOSPLAVNOSTI Fig. 4 - Ústí nad Labem water stage since May 2008, red water stage, blue full navigation limit. Underground water levels and yield decrease since spring months. Most of the observation boreholes and springs are below normal and belong to 37 % (boreholes) resp. 29 % of lowest historical observations. These values are comparable to those measured in 2007 drought (fig.5). 80 70 60 50 % 40 30 20 10 0 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 prameny Fig. 5 Course of underground water levels and yields in the meaning of probability distribution curve rank since July 2007. 50 % means average, lower values indicate drought. There are significant regional and local differences. While boreholes and spring in Silesia and Bohemian-Moravian Highland are close to the normal, central Bohemia and south Moravia show drought (belongs to 15 % of lowest historical observation). vrty

Fig. 6 Springs yield with respect to July long time normal. Red very low, pink low, white normal, pale blue high, blue very high. Fig. 7 Boreholes water level with respect to July long time normal. Red very low, pink low, white normal, pale blue high, blue very high.

Future outlook Long-range meteorological forecast is for normal precipitation and temperature during August. Medium-range meteorological models assume possible more frequent precipitation in the middle of August, however quantitative prediction is not reasonable so far. If the forecast full fill the drought risk and wild fire flood risk will decrease. In the case of torrent precipitation of more than 30 mm some slow increase of water level of small streams could be also expected. Underground waters are expected to be stable or continue in slow decrease.