USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?



Similar documents
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

April 17, 2015 SUMMARY OF SUBJECT MATTER

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

USACE Asset Management Program

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Aligning Natural and Built Infrastructure for

Lockport Pool Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Illinois Waterway

Water Resource Issues in the 110 th Congress

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

USACE Dam Safety Program Current Approach & Methodology

How to Become a Navy Engineer For $78,000 in USD

MAINTAINING READINESS THROUGH FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

US Army Corps of Engineers. Vision Statement. Be the premier stewards of entrusted hydropower resources

Oklahoma Governor s Water Conference

CASE STUDY. City of Grand Rapids Stormwater Asset Management Program. City of Grand Rapids. By the Numbers

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

A Citizen s Guide to the Corps of Engineers

New Orleans Hurricane Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Tour March 23 24, 2012

URBAN WATERS. Federal Partnership. LosAngeles River Pilot

The Rising Cost of Fire Operations: Effects on the Forest Service s Non-Fire Work

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District Monitoring of a Hurricane Sandy Contract Needs Improvement

Potential Impacts of Hydrofracturing on Dam & Levee Safety

SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME. Terms of reference

Disaster Recovery Managing and Leveraging Multiple Funding Sources

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

Building Resilient Infrastructure for the 21 st Century

RESUME Lee A. Knuppel, P.E.

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress of the United States of America

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AGENCY-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER ACCOMPANYING INFORMATION

ESRI_UC_2015_No843_Integrating Flood Risk Management and Salmon Habitat Restoration_CampbellSW

The Army Corps of Engineers and the Flood Risk Challenge

Appendix F Benefit-Cost Analysis of Flood Protection Measures

The Muddy River: A Century of Change

Subactivity: Habitat Conservation Program Element: National Wetlands Inventory

Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas

BEFORE THE PHILADELPHIA WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER RATE BOARD DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEPHEN J. FURTEK

Analysis of the Obama Administration s FY 2017 Budget Proposal for Transportation

Financing water supply and sanitation in the Greater Cairo area

American Society of Civil Engineers

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PORTS OF LOUISIANA AND THE MARITIME INDUSTRY

Aging Infrastructure. Construction Insider. XL Group Insurance

Tres Rios del Norte Feasibility Study

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

Written Testimony of Frederick Tombar Senior Advisor for Disaster Recovery to Secretary of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

Flood System Repair Project

Gulf Coast Restoration & recovery 101 Basic policies, legal processes, and terms relevant to the Deepwater Horizon disaster

Table of Contents. Introduction Guidance Permit fact sheet Completeness checklist. Introduction

Policy Brief June 2010

How To Improve The Health Of The Corps

Testimony of Tom Woods President, Woods Custom Homes On Behalf of the National Association of Home Builders

LR 314 Working Group 5 Final Report

Coastal Restoration Spending in Louisiana Economic Impact Analysis

Composition of Federal Spending

Nashville District Workload for Nashville SAME Professional Development Workshop

Assessing Rivers for Restoration Purposes. Ann L. Riley Waterways Restoration Institute

THE FOUR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS TO THE CHAO PHRAYA RIVER

Section 401 Water Quality Certification

Testimony of James W. Runcie Chief Operating Officer Federal Student Aid U.S. Department of Education

FOUR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT

Our Challenging Future

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

Managing the nexus for a low carbon future. Prof Mike Muller Wits P&DM, NPC, DBSA

International Commission On Large Dams Environment August A Viewpoint from the International Commission on Large Dams

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Eric D. (Ric) Hines, PE February 2012 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Norfolk Flooding Strategy Update. Presentation to Norfolk City Council March 27, 2012

NASHVILLE DISTRICT JETS SAME

The Budget: Effectively Implementing The 2014 Water Bond

Implementing the Water Resources Development Act of 2007

DIVISION OF COMMUNITY DEVELEOPMENT

Transcription:

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect? National Waterways Conference Legislative Summit Steven L. Stockton, P.E. Director of Civil Works, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 25 March 2014 US Army Corps of Engineers US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

The Bottom Line: USACE s Civil Works mission provides a key foundational component of the Nation s public infrastructure that facilitates economic growth, quality of life, environmental health and national security for the American people! CW infrastructure is deteriorating (declining engineering condition). CW infrastructure is underperforming (declining service performance). U.S. is under-investing in its public works infrastructure overall. U.S. lags other developed nations in its maintenance of prior public infrastructure investments. We stand to squander the international competitive advantage provided by the Nation s public works due to our inattention to the needs of aging infrastructure, shifting demand, climate change, and underinvestment. At risk is U.S. s economic prosperity, quality of life & environmental health. USACE CW infrastructure is on unsustainable glide-path of benign neglect. Devolving from a paradigm of preventing failure, to one of fixing after failure, and towards even failing to fix! 2

The Value of Past Investments An illustration of the relationship between services yielded by ecosystems, infrastructure, and the economic activities they support. The value of natural and constructed systems was viewed as being greater than the sum of their intertwined parts, not only for the present generations, but also for those that would follow. From: A Multiple-Purpose River Basin Development, A Water Policy for the American People The Report for the President s Water Resources Policy Commission (1950) 3 3

USACE CW s Economic Benefits & Revenues to the Treasury 2010 Each dollar spent on the USACE Civil Works program generated ~ $9.00 in economic benefits and $2.70 in revenues to the U.S. Treasury. Program NED Benefits (Billions of Dollars) Net NED Benefits (Billions of Dollars) U.S. Treasury Revenues (Billions of Dollars) Flood Risk Management $23.1 $22.5 $7.3 Coastal Navigation $8.7 $7.9 $3.3 Inland Navigation $7.6 $7.0 $1.9 Water Supply $6.5 $6.5 $0.1 Hydropower $2.2 $2.0 $1.1 Recreation $3.3 $3.0 $1.1 Leases and Sales $0.1 Total Annual NED $51.4 $48.9 $14.8 Notes: (1) Net NED Benefits represent total NED benefits minus the costs of operations, maintenance, expenses, the USACE Regulatory program, FUSRAP, oversight by ASA(CW) and other USACE Civil Works programs. (2) The Benefits and Revenues numbers are not additive. 4

Mandatory Spending Crowds Out Everything Else 5

Value to the Nation US Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Budget in 2012 - $8.2 Billion (~0.2% 2012 Discretionary Outlays)* - $48.8 Billion per year in realized NED benefits (~0.3% GDP) Big Bang for the Buck 6:1 Ratio * 2012 outlays includes supplemental funding 6

1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 Historical Investments by USACE Functional Category 1928 to 2011 ~$70.00 per person in the US! ~$56.00 per person in the US! * ~$18.00 per person in the US! ~$9.28 per person in the US! Year * Navigation Flood Multipurpose MR&T Dredging post 2006-2010 Spending includes Katrina & ARRA Supplemental s 7 Billions of FY 2011 Dollars

USACE CW Spending as a Percent of GDP 0.8% 0.035% As %of GDP, USACE CW spending has declined from 0.8% (1935) to ~ 0.035% today Today s spending represents a decline by a factor >20 as % of GDP Current spending levels will not sustain services levels 8

Effects of Constrained Investments Outages at Hydropower Facilities are Increasing Since 2000: ~50% increase in down time Threefold increase in forced outages! 9

Effects of Constrained Investments Increasing Engineering Problems with the Nation s Aging Levees Sinkholes Design Deficiency Sluice Gates Excavation Slides Embankment Relief Wells Sod Cover Shoaling and Riprap Settlement Encroachments Vegetation Closure Structues Bank Caving Discharge Pipes Slope Stability Floodwalls Culverts Animal Control Pump Stations Issues facing levee systems across the nation. 10

Effects of Constrained Investments System Reliability is Suffering as Outages are Increasing at Navigation Locks Since 2000: ~50% increase in unavailability Twofold increase in scheduled outages! 11

Effects of Constrained Investments Vessel Delays at Our Locks are Increasing Since 2009: more than a doubling in delays! Roughly 770,000 hours of delays in 2013 These are actual delays experienced by vessels! 12

Effects of Constrained Investments USACE Dams are Aging and the Urgency of Dam Safety Actions is Increasing USACE Dam Safety Action Classifications (DSAC s) 707 dams at 557 projects DSAC chart includes all USACE dams except one newly constructed dam that has not been assigned a DSAC value. Data source: DSPMT, 16 Oct 2013 13

Relative Quality of US Infrastructure is Declining U.S. Port Infrastructure not even among the top 15 in World! 14

Patterns in Global Spending in Infrastructure As a fraction of GDP, the U.S. Lags other Developed Nations in Infrastructure Investment 15

Relative Differences in Global Infrastructure Spending U.S. High GDP, Relatively Low Infrastructure Investment 16

Gross Fixed Investment (Public & Private Sectors) - United States Relative to Other Nations US Has Overall Low Investment in Infrastructure! (Ranking equivalent to Greece) 17

Distribution of US Infrastructure Investment Shortfall by 2020 32% of the shortfall ($372B) involves infrastructure associated with Corps authorities! Water Ports Waterways Levees Dams Power generation Approximately $200.00 per person per year (the equivalent of one latte per week) 18

19

USACE Capital Stock Value by Functional Category 1928 to 2011 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $- 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Year Navigation Flood Multipurpose MRT Dredging 20 Billions of FY 2011 Dollars

USACE Capital Stock Value, 1928 to 2011 & Trends Based on Investment Levels Reflecting a Continuation of the 1982-2011 Decline versus Sustainment of 2011 Capital Stock Value $300 $250 $265 Billion Billions of FY 2011 Dollars $200 $150 $100 $50 - Represents the added expenditures necessary to sustain the CW capital stock value at current levels through 2045. - On average, this amounts to an annual expenditure of nearly $7 billion from 2012 through 2045. 1 $192 Billion. 2 $130 Billion. $0 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 2044 Year Investment to Sustain 2011 Capital Stock Value Maintain 2011 Capital (Position Stock 1) Capital Stock Value 2012-2045, Assuming Current Rate of Decline USACE Capital Stock Value 1928-2011 21

What is at risk? Potential Impact on Public Benefits Missed opportunities for: Additional job creation National and regional economic growth Improved intermodal freight transportation logistics & reduced consumer prices Increased exports and imports Reduced flood vulnerability to life & property Improved hydro-electric energy generation Flexible provision of water supply Enhanced fish and wildlife habitat & restored wetlands Sustaining the availability of outdoor recreation USACE Capital Stock presently yields $48.8 BILLION PER YEAR in realized NED benefits! Reduced contributions to legacy U.S.: Standard of living Economic prosperity Quality of life Environmental health National security and defense 22

What is needed? $6.7 Billion $5.7 Billion $5.7 Billion $29.3 Billion U.S. Chamber of Commerce Estimates of Waterborne Transportation Needs for 2013-2030 23

Conclusion USACE s Civil Works mission provides a key foundational component of the Nation s public infrastructure that facilitates economic growth, quality of life, environmental health and national security for the American people! CW infrastructure is deteriorating (declining engineering condition). CW infrastructure is underperforming (declining service performance). U.S. is under-investing in its public works infrastructure overall. U.S. lags other developed nations in its maintenance of prior public infrastructure investments. We stand to squander the international competitive advantage provided by the Nation s public works due to our inattention to the needs of aging infrastructure, shifting demand, climate change, and underinvestment. At risk is U.S. s economic prosperity, quality of life & environmental health. USACE CW infrastructure is on unsustainable glide-path of benign neglect. Devolving from a paradigm of preventing failure, to one of fixing after failure, and towards even failing to fix! 24

Transforming Civil Works Planning Transform n Methods of Delivery Delivering on Commitments Watershed- Informed Budget Development 25

Planning Modernization Determine Federal Interest Authorization Backlog Follow-on Work Chief s Reports Smart Planning Education & Training Portfolio Management 26

Budget Development Engaging Stakeholders Watershed Informed Budgeting Management Controls Smart Investments 27 BUILDING STRONG

Methods of Delivery Deliver on Commitments Building the Bench Delivering Value for the Nation: OUTCOMES 28

Infrastructure Strategy Asset Management Life Cycle Management Replacement Value= $250 B Kentucky River Lock #2, in service since 1839 Alternative Resources Accelerate Execution Pilots Obstacles Authorities Re-Invent Operations 29

What Can You Do? Tell the Story - Preach CW Value to Nation Leverage Efforts - Collaborate with ALL stakeholders and beneficiaries of the Civil Works Program Find consensus for major initiatives Identify funding to reach outcomes Engage in dialogue Be mutually supportive Involve & engage end-users Seek to influence decision-makers Help us transform Civil Works Facilitate a Watershed-Informed approach Help the Nation prioritize efforts, programs, and projects Support innovative approaches for alternative resourcing 30 30

Other Items of Interest Waters of the United States Rulemaking Water Supply Rulemaking Rehabilitation and Inspection Program (PL 84-99) Eligibility Criteria WRRDA/WRDA FY-15 Budget Hearings

Questions & Discussion US Army Corps of Engineers

Influence of Infrastructure Investment on GDP and Jobs GDP Added investment in infrastructure could yield, by 2020 Addition of: up to 1.8 Million Jobs! up to $320B to GDP Jobs 33

Corps CW Missions and its Influence on GDP Ends versus means Flood risk reduction Coastal storm damage reduction Navigation and multi-modal transport among others Each contributes to greater efficiency and reliability of the economic systems that make our livelihoods possible. Source: Industry Economic Accounts Directorate, Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce Many sectors benefit from services yielded by Corps authorities and associated infrastructure. Roughly half of the GDP activity functions in the shadow of Corps authorities. How would waterfront industrial complexes, real estate markets, commercial trade, transportation networks, and other sectors of the economy function in the absence of such systems? 34

Corps CW Mission and its Influence on Jobs Source: Industry Economic Accounts Directorate, Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), U.S. Department of Commerce 35

Water Infrastructure Spending Trends Between 1962 to 2010 While total public funding (in 2012 $ s) of water infrastructure has increased As a % GDP, spending has decreased And Federal spending has dropped dramatically as % GDP Placing an unsustainable burden on state & local funding sources as infrastructure ages. 36