Neversink River East Branch



Similar documents
Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge

Appendix C. Project Opportunities. Middle Twisp River (RM )

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

Assessing Rivers for Restoration Purposes. Ann L. Riley Waterways Restoration Institute

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

RESTORING streams to reduce flood loss

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

Various options are discussed below.these low cost, low impact interventions can also be applied as general erosion control methods.

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL


General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

Flood Hazard Area Technical Manual Section 8 Bank Stabilization and Stream Restoration

Crossing creeks Stream crossings on farms

Urban Stream Restoration Implementation Auburn, AL March 13-14

1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide. River crossings

Appendix H Dredging and Stream Channel Restoration

Post-Flood Emergency Stream Intervention. After repairs. Training Manual

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

Topic 8: Open Channel Flow

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

Year Post Restoration Monitoring Summary Rock Creek Project Monitoring and Analysis conducted by Bio-Surveys,LLC. Contact: strask@casco.

Outlet stabilization structure

A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast

Sand and Silt Removal from Salmonid Streams

Homeowner s Guide to Drainage

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

Open Channel Flow in Aquaculture

3. Design Procedures. Design Procedures. Introduction

FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum

Basic Principles of Channel Design

Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013

SCHNEIDER CREEK REMEDIATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

The students will be working in and alongside the stream, so safety is a consideration. Suitable sites should have the following characteristics:

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Rural Flooding: The Potential Role of Forestry

CHAPTER 9 CULVERTS 2005

2.0 BASIC CONCEPTS OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

Riprap-lined Swale (RS)

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

River Wensum Restoration Strategy Swanton Morley Restoration Scheme Reach 14a

IMPROVING SOUTH FORK PEACHTREE CREEK WATERSHED USING THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA

How To Write A Watercourse Crossing

Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

How To Assess An Area For Erosion

Floodplain Mapping. Vision. Events: 1 in 2 year 1 in 10 year 1 in 20 year 1 in 50 year 1 in 100 year Probable Maximum Flood Climate Change Impacts

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

Basic Soil Erosion and Types

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING DESIGN LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND RIVER RESTORATION.

CLIFTY CREEK PLANT MADISON, INDIANA

Scour and Scour Protection

BRIDGE SCOUR INVESTIGATION: DEVELOPING A SCREENING AND HYDRAULIC VULNERABILITY RATING SYSTEM FOR BRIDGES B.HERON 1 & C.BOWE 2

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

30-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE CHELSEA RIVER, EAST BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECT

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Amherst Dam. Michael Juris - Village President Joe Behlen, P.E. WDNR Dam Safety Engineer Gerald Krueger, P.E. AECOM

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management

Welded Mesh Gabions and Mattresses River Protection Design Guide HY-TEN GABION SOLUTIONS Dunstall Hill Trading Estate, Gorsebrook Road,

1. Carry water under the canal 2. Carry water over the canal 3. Carry water into the canal

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO POINT REPAIRS AND OBSTRUCTION REMOVALS

The purpose of this meeting is to inform the public of the updates to the project, and to get input before the finalization of the project.

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Transcription:

Neversink River East Branch Management Unit 10 Summary of Post-Flood Recommendations Intervention Level Full restoration of the stream reach including the eroding bank site between Station 38380 and Station 37930. (BEMS NEB10_37900) Assisted restoration of the bank erosion site between Station 36720 and Station 36450. (BEMS NEB10_36400) Passive restoration of the bank erosion site between Station 35600 and Station 35540. (BEMS NEB10_35500) Stream Morphology Riparian Vegetation Infrastructure Aquatic Habitat Flood Related Threats Water Quality Further Assessment None. Stream Channel and Floodplain Current Conditions The following description of stream morphology is the result of a survey conducted in December, 2011. Left and right references are oriented looking downstream, photos are also oriented looking downstream unless otherwise noted. Stationing references, however, proceed upstream, in feet, from an origin (Station 0) at the confluence with the Neversink Reservoir. Italicized terms are defined in the glossary. A berm begins along the right bank at Station 38800, ending nearly 400-feet downstream at Station 38440. At the time of the summer 2010 survey it was noted that the side cast stream materials in this berm, along with a shallow and overwidened channel in this reach suggest that the stream may have been cleared with a bulldozer at some point in the past. Consistent with past activities, this stream reach appears to have been excavated following the flooding associated with TS Irene. The resulting side bar and main channel are not MUeB10A.1

sized to transport sediment effectively, and the bar appears to block former floodplain channels, effectively disconnecting the stream from the floodplain in this stream reach. A full restoration effort in this stream reach to shape and align it to improve effectiveness of sediment transport described is described below. In 2010, the bank along this berm was documented as actively eroding for approximately 185 feet from Station 38660 to Station 38475. This eroding bank segment is no longer present due to the reconstructed channel through this stream reach. Stream channel reach that is overwidened and shallow due to post-flood restoration efforts. (IMGP1572) Continuing downstream, the stream begins to meander to the right exposing a long bank erosion section on the left bank beginning at Station 38380 and continuing approximately 450-feet to Station 37930 (BEMS NEB10_37900). Since 2010 this bank has experienced continued hydraulic erosion which led to significant bank retreat. Most of the several large trees along this bank that were experiencing root scour in 2010 were carried downstream during recent high flow events. A point bar consisting of cobble sized materials on the inside of the meander bend directly across from the bank erosion site documented in 2010 has since aggraded due to sediment deposition. It appears that in an effort to protect Denning Road from future flooding, large woody debris and root wads were collected from this stream reach and placed along the tree line behind this point bar. Point bar continues to form across from erosion area. (IMGP1574) M U e B 1 0 A. 2 Neversink Stream Management Plan

Full restoration is recommended for this site, including stabilization of the left bank using bioengineering techniques, establishment of a riparian buffer to slow near-bank velocities and reduce shear stresses on the bank during future high flow events, and re-alignment of the channel to establish a more sustainable radius of curvature for this stream reach. Approximately 100 feet downstream from the point bar, the stream takes a hard left turn and enters into a straight reach highlighted by excessive accumulation of large woody debris and channel instability. While the exact location of the woody Root wads and large woody debris placed along the tree line behind the cobble point bar. (IMGP1578) debris jams and obstructions have shifted slightly, the river processes impacting this stream reach have remained the same since the summer of 2010. Debris accumulation has resulted in channel braiding along the well connected right and left floodplains. Continued channel instability is also evident in the formation of headcuts below obstructions. Scour is occurring directly downstream of the obstructions because the water faces an abrupt vertical drop as it flows over the debris. This continuous scour is resulting in headcuts which are actively migrating upstream, and will continue to do so until they meet a substrate that is not erodible. Prior to TS Irene, several dry side channels diverged from the main channel into the right floodplain and ran adjacent to Denning Road. Since TS Irene, these channels have been taking active flow. If a majority of the flow becomes diverted into these channels by woody debris obstructions upstream, this could pose a threat to the road during future high flow events. Headcut in stream reach characterized by woody obstructions. (IMGP1581) Erosion on the left bank begins at Station 36720 and continues until Station 36450 (BEMS NEB10_36400). Hydraulic erosion has exposed cobble sized alluvial material at the toe of this bank. A large hemlock located at the downstream end of a depositional point bar at Station 36500 is causing an obstruction to high flows, further contributing to deposition and exacerbating erosion of the left bank. Neversink Stream Management Plan M U e B 1 0 A. 3

Large rocks are beginning to deposit at the toe of this eroding bank. However, due to the near vertical slope of the bank and the increased scour caused by the obstruction immediately downstream, this bank is still at risk for further erosion during high flow events. Therefore, assisted restoration is recommended for this site, including removal of the woody obstruction downstream and possibly bioengineering techniques to stabilize the bank. During the 2010 survey a stacked rock wall was documented between Station 36380 and Station 36300. The revetment was designed to provide bank stabilization and protection for this section of Denning Road. This revetment was repaired due to Eroding bank segment and woody debris obstruction. (IMGP1858) damage to Denning Road during the flooding associated with TS Irene. It was extended to 190 feet long with an average height of 12 feet. The top two courses of the revetment adjacent to Denning Road are now a sloped stone wall. The revetment was documented in good structural and functional condition. The culvert protruding through the revetment is still present, remaining a potential source for contaminants from road runoff. Stacked rock wall on right bank protecting Denning Road. (IMGP1586) MUeB10A.4 Neversink Stream Management Plan

From Station 35600 through Station 35525 (BEMS NEB10_35500) an eroding bank segment has resulted in exposure of the root structure of the mature vegetation across from a depositional bar. In December 2011 this eroding bank segment was also documented as a potential source of fine sediment from glacial till. It is still possible for this bank to stabilize without treatment (passive restoration). However, it is recommended that this site be monitored for changes in condition. EBMU10 ends at Station 34900 where Erts Brook converges from the right floodplain. Bank erosion site in need of continued monitoring. (IMGP1598) Neversink Stream Management Plan M U e B 1 0 A. 5