WBS Development: Rules, Aberrations, and MIL-STD-881C Implementation Challenges



Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE

THE WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE IN AN ACQUISITION REFORM ENVIRONMENT. Prepared For: COST SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Developing Work Breakdown Structures

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK

Appendix B: Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

AIRCRAFT WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (WBS) LEVELS (FROM MILITARY SPECIFICATION 881)

Project Time Management Activity Definition Activity Sequencing Duration Estimating Schedule Development Schedule Control

Space Flight Project Work Breakdown Structure

Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Manual

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE HANDBOOK

Department of Defense MANUAL

Headquarters U.S. Air Force. Building CERs & SERs for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

Services we provide. Tel:

Software Cost Estimation Metrics Manual for Defense Systems

Program/Project Management Series Work Breakdown Structure Reference Guide

Position Descriptions. Aerospace

Israel s Aerospace Industry. Higher Faster Farther

Demystifying the PMBOK: Project Planning Made Simple" By" Bill Carswell, Ph.D., PMP" Adjunct Professor" Embry Riddle Aeronautical University" "

Cost and Software Data Reporting Training

Military Handbook 881 Work Breakdown Structure Update

Canadian Aerospace Industry

Improving ERP Estimating

Project Control System Manual. Jefferson Science Associates, LLC. 200 Organization. Project Control System Manual Revision

Implementation of the DoD Management Control Program for Navy Acquisition Category II and III Programs (D )

The Air Force Materiel Command

Head, Office of Project Management Oversight

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE Supplement 2 Government Contract Provisions from the Department of Defense FAR Supplement TC-003 ( 10/15)

John T. Dillard GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS & PUBLIC POLICY U.S. NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

Fleet Ballistic Missile Eastern Range Operations Supporting Navy Testing and Deployment

How To Develop A Data Center Cost Model

Industry and Business Applications. Industry and Business Applications

Summary of GAO Cost Estimate Development Best Practices and GAO Cost Estimate Audit Criteria

Accounting System. Page 1 of 9

Appendix D Glossary Of Terms

This EVMS Training Snippet sponsored by the Office of Acquisition and Project Management (OAPM) covers Firm Fixed Price (or FFP type) subcontracts.

Positive Train Control (PTC) Program Management Plan

NUMBER: 12.PM-004 RESPONSIBILITY: Office of Project Support Services REVISION: 4 APPROVED BY: TITLE SUBJECT: Head, Office of Project Support Services

FOREWORD. Page 2 of 88

SCHEDULING GUIDE FOR PROGRAM MANAGERS

SAIC Corporate and Small Business Introduction

ESA s Data Management System for the Russian Segment of the International Space Station

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS 4/10/2003 1

MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS. Delivering a Full Range of Integrated Planning Services

Best Practices for the Acquisition of COTS-Based Software Systems (CBSS): Experiences from the Space Systems Domain

Fixed Work Breakdown Structures in Microsoft Project A Case for a Custom Outline Code Field

Information Technology

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED: 16-S-1407, March 3, 2016.

Agenda. 0 Agenda review 2 minutes. 0 Chapter of the week 50 minutes. 0 Q&A of chapter 10 minutes. 0 Break 10 minutes. 0 Exercises 25 minutes

VA ICJIS. Program Management Plan

How To Design A Low Cost Unmanned Vehicle

New England Defense Contracting Trends

OPERATING AND SUPPORT COST-ESTIMATING GUIDE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE COST ANALYSIS IMPROVEMENT GROUP

Cost and Software Data Reporting Training

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Committees

Accurate Risk Assessment Using Multi-Relational Hazard/Mishap Pairings

TechNet Land Forces South Small Business Opportunities. Carey Webster Director, Federal Information Solutions Deltek

Q2A First Article Inspection (FAI) AS9102

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Management of the Department of Defense Information Enterprise

Federal Aviation Administration Standard Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Version 3.1

The UK National Aeronautics Technology Strategy

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Autonomic Logistics Supply Chain

Oracle RAC Services Appendix

Estimating Software Maintenance Costs: The O&M Phase

Using Spiral Development To Reduce Acquisition Cycle Times

KILN GROUP AVIATION DIVISION UAS INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM GLOSSARY

Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 Guided Missiles

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

OPERATING AND SUPPORT COST-ESTIMATING GUIDE

Establishing Great Software Development Process(es) for Your Organization. By Dale Mayes

Washington, DC Contract period: to North Star Group, LLC. 600 Maryland Ave SW, Suite 860E

Introduction to the CMMI Acquisition Module (CMMI-AM)

Report No. DoDIG April 27, Navy Organic Airborne and Surface Influence Sweep Program Needs Defense Contract Management Agency Support

The future of range instrumentation.

CUSTOMER KEYNOTE Hal Buddenbohm

F 35 Lightning II Program Quality Assurance and Corrective Action Evaluation

Major Contracts on Schriever Air Force Base

Commercial Software Licensing

FERMI RESEARCH ALLIANCE PROCEDURES PROJECT MANAGEMENT. Head, Office of Project Management Oversight

Unit 06 Developing the Work Breakdown Structure

WATCHKEEPER X UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS)

Improvements Needed for Awarding Service Contracts at Naval Special Warfare Command

Short Guides to IDA Quality Assurance Guidelines. Development and Validation Phase. Issue 2.0

Under moderate supervision, tests and troubleshoots hardware and/or software problems, makes repairs. May supervise or provide leadership to staff.

Appendix E Program Management Plan Template

TECHNICAL REVIEW MANUAL (TRM)

Introduction to the ITS Project Management Methodology

CAT VIII WORKING DRAFT

ATC Case Study. Air Traffic Control Case Study. ATC Requirements. SE380-F'02-Lecture 17 11/4/ by Eric A. Durant, Ph.D. 1.

IAI/Malat Solutions for the Maritime Arena

Aerospace in Washington State. Impact Washington NIST-MEP Affiliate

PRESENTATION SPACE MISSIONS

JSP 886 DEFENCE LOGISTIC SUPPORT CHAIN MANUAL VOLUME 7 INTEGRATED LOGISTIC SUPPORT PART 8.12 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

Appendix 2-A. Application and System Development Requirements

Transcription:

Development: Rules, Aberrations, and MIL-STD-881C Implementation Challenges M. Michael Metcalf, Technomics Inc. SCEA/ISPA 2012 Sponsor: Mr. Mike Augustus, DCARC Some material was taken from DCARC training materials also developed by: Rob Currie, Charlotte McIntosh and Angela Camp from Technomics/DCARC

Work Breakdown Structures Defines the work necessary to complete a project Provides a consistent framework for project management Can be used to track cost, schedule, and technical data 2

Application in DoD Product-oriented Composed of hardware, software, services, data, and facilities elements that make up end item Derived from MIL-STD-881C appendix Prime Mission Product (PMP) required to Level 3, Common Elements to Level 2 Lower level elements must come from MIL-STD-881C where available Created by CWIPT prior to RFP Data quality increases when defined up front Goal: Achieve a consistent application of the for all programmatic needs 3

Product-Oriented Prime Mission elements are defined deliverables (products) Hierarchical structure 100% Rule: Lower-level elements sum to equal the parent element Standardized at higher levels, program specific at lower levels (Level 4+) GAO Best Practices: Element Code Element Name 1.0 F-51 Fighter 1.1 Air Vehicle 1.1.1 Airframe 1.1.2 Propulsion 1.1.3 Vehicle Subsystems 1.1.4 Avionics 1.1.4.1 Avionics IAT&C 1.1.4.2 Communication/Identification 1.1.4.3 Navigation/Guidance 1.1.4.3.1 Navigation 1.1.4.3.2 Guidance 1.1.4.4 Mission Computer/Processing 1.1.4.12 Avionics Software Releases 1.1.5 Armament/Weapons Delivery 1.1.9 Air Vehicle IAT&C 1.2+ From MIL-STD-881C Appendix A for Aircraft [Common Elements, such as SE/PM, Data, Training, etc.] 4

MIL-STD-881C Appendices New in MIL-STD-881C Common Elements L Aircraft A Electronic Systems B AIS K Missiles C Launch Vehicles J MIL-STD- 881C Ordnance D Unmanned Maritime I Sea Systems E UAVs H Surface Vehicles G Space Systems F 5

Other Rules Level: Only high-value, high-risk, or high-interest elements should be defined below Level 3 or 4 No Single Child elements If it doesn t fit, use Appendix B Electronic Systems is framework for any PMP Allows system to be broken into subsystems and provides distinction for hardware and software Often used for Subcontract Robust Dictionary is required Context is needed to make data useful 6

Drivers and Influences Contractor Accounting & Management Program Management Cost Estimating Reporting (CSDR, CPR, IMS, SEP, etc.) Program Oversight Systems Engineering Consider: developed prior to RFP & Award 7

: A Question of Balance development requires balance between: Program Management and Cost Estimating Must meet current needs, but also have a long view Standardization and Flexibility New MIL-STD-881C adds a structure for adding programspecific elements; is it enough? Government data needs and Contractor processes Accurate data requires to have a close tie to contractor accounting system, but not at the expense of data utility Level of detail requested may incur large reporting burden 8

Development Aberrations development rules and guidance do not detail implementation for some common scenarios Operations & Support (O&S) Programs with multiple variants Technology Development Non-contract costs 9

Aberrations O&S MIL-STD-881C focuses on acquisition Contractor Sustainment Report (CSR, 1921-4) contains O&S reporting structure Not a product-oriented But: MIL-STD-881C elements can be added where appropriate e.g. under CONSUMABLES AND REPAIR PARTS include Propulsion, Flight Control, Electrical etc. Matches forthcoming O&S Cost Estimating Guide from OSD/CAPE 10

Aberrations Multiple Variants Two-Variant Examples: Notice that tracking of Common HW/SW and Common Elements is key Option 2 : 1.1 Common HW Option 3 : 1.1 Aircraft HW 1.2+ Aircraft SE/PM, Data, Training, etc. Option 1 : 1.1 Variant A HW OR 1.2 Var. A-Specific HW OR Common Report 1.2 Variant B HW 1.3 Var. B-Specific HW Variant A Report 1.3+ SE/PM, Data, Training, etc. 1.4+ SE/PM, Data, Training, etc. Variant B Report 11

Other Aberrations Technology Development phase It is difficult to build a product-oriented when the product is not well-defined can be built at high-level, but detail some stakeholders desire may be lost Non-contract Program costs Not addressed in MIL-STD-881C and no consistent framework exists e.g. Program Office, Labs, Government-Furnished Equipment 12

MIL-STD-881C Overview Issued October 2011 Supersedes and cancels MIL-HDBK-881A Overarching document for use in all DoD acquisitions Documents the process for building a Includes definitions for common elements and eleven commodity types 13

New in MIL-STD-881C Three new Appendices added defined below Level 3 for most commodities Space to Level 5 Sea Systems and Surface Vehicles remain at Level 3 All others to Level 4 All elements and definitions reviewed and updated Includes a construct for expanding for programunique items and new technologies Elements called Other [Component] 1 n (Specify) and similar elements contain a standard numbering scheme 14

MIL-STD-881C Challenges Implementation Requirements New start programs all use MIL-STD Existing contracts continue with approved All programs re-evaluated at new award & milestone Standard numbering of elements Should be maintained as part standardization However, often lost with use of 1 n construct 15

MIL-STD-881C Challenges Using the 1 n Construct 243 instances of expandable elements across appendices These cannot all be implemented the same way Wake Up! It s time to go to School! 16

1 n Construct: The Basics Element Code 1.0 MIL-STD 881C Appendix A Element Name F-51 Fighter 1.1 Air Vehicle 1.1.7 Furnishings and Equipment 1.1.8 Air Vehicle Software Release 1...n 1.1.9 Air Vehicle Integration, Assembly, Test, and Checkout Element Code Element Name 1.0 F-51 Fighter 1.1 Air Vehicle 1.1.1 Airframe 1.1.1.1 Airframe Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.1.2 Fuselage 1.1.1.3 Wing 1.1.1.4 Empennage 1.1.1.5 Nacelle 1.1.1.6 Other Airframe Components 1...n (Specify) 1.1.2 Propulsion A: Related set of elements Element Code 1.0 F-51 Fighter 1.1 Air Vehicle Implementation A Element Name 1.1.7 Furnishings and Equipment 1.1.8 Air Vehicle Software Releases 1.1.8.1 Air Vehicle Software Release 1 1.1.8.2 Air Vehicle Software Release 2 1.1.8.3 Air Vehicle Software Release 3 1.1.9 Air Vehicle Integration, Assembly, Test, and Checkout B: Independent components MIL-STD 881C Appendix A Implementation B Element Code Element Name 1.0 F-51 Fighter 1.1 Air Vehicle 1.1.1 Airframe 1.1.1.1 Airframe Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.1.2 Fuselage 1.1.1.3 Wing 1.1.1.4 Empennage 1.1.1.5 Nacelle 1.1.1.6 Stealth Special Airframe Part A 1.1.1.7 Stealth Special Airframe Part B 1.1.2 Propulsion 17

1 n Construct 202 Element Code MIL-STD-881C Appendix H Reporting Elements 1.0 UAV System 1.1 Air Vehicle 1.2 Payload 1.2.1 Payload Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.2.2 Survivability Payload 1...n (Specify) 1.2.3 Reconnaissance Payload 1...n (Specify) 1.2.4 Electronic Warfare Payload 1...n (Specify) 1.2.5 Armament/Weapons Delivery Payload 1...n (Specify) 1.2.6 Payload Software Release 1...n 1.2.7 Other Payload 1...n (Specify) Element Code Implementation A Reporting Elements 1.0 UAV System 1.1 Air Vehicle 1.2 Payload 1.2.1 Payload IAT&CO 1.2.2 Survivability Payloads 1.2.2.1 Survivability Payload 1 1.2.2.2 Survivability Payload 2 1.2.2.3 Survivability Payload 3 1.2.3 Reconnaissance Payload 1 1.2.4 Electronic Warfare Payload 1 1.2.5 Armament/Weapons Delivery Payload 1 1.2.6 Payload Software Release 1 1.2.7 Other Payload 1 Or Element Code UAV Payloads: Are they a single system or not? Implementation B Reporting Elements 1.0 UAV System 1.1 Air Vehicle 1.2 Payload 1.2.1 Payload IAT&CO 1.2.2 Survivability Payload 1 1.2.3 Survivability Payload 2 1.2.4 Survivability Payload 3 1.2.5 Reconnaissance Payload 1 1.2.6 Electronic Warfare Payload 1 1.2.7 Armament/Weapons Delivery Payload 1 1.2.8 Payload Software Release 1 1.2.9 Other Payload 1 18

1 n Construct 303 Element Code 1.0 Electronic System 1.1 Prime Mission Product (PMP) 1...n (Specify) 1.1.1 PMP Subsystem 1...n (Specify) 1.1.1.1 PMP Subsystem Hardware 1...n (Specify) 1.1.1.2 PMP Subsystem Software Release 1...n 1.1.1.3 Subsystem Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.2 PMP Software Release 1...n (Specify) 1.1.2.1 Software Product Engineering 1.1.2.2 Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI) 1...n 1.1.2.3 Subsystem Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.1.3 PMP Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.2 Platform Integration, Assembly, Test and Checkout 1.3 System Engineering MIL-STD-881C Appendix B Reporting Elements When Parent has 1 n Construct, maintain the level, repeat all Children Take care when defining PMPs and Subsystems Element Code Implementation C Reporting Elements 1.0 Electronic System 1.1 Prime Mission Product 1.1.1 PMP Subsystem A 1.1.1.1 PMP Subsystem A Hardware 1.1.1.2 PMP Subsystem A Software 1.1.1.3 Subsystem A IAT&CO 1.1.2 PMP Subsystem B 1.1.2.1 PMP Subsystem B Hardware 1.1.2.2 PMP Subsystem B Software 1.1.2.3 Subsystem B IAT&CO 1.1.3 PMP Software 1.1.3.1 Software Product Engineering 1.1.3.2 CSCI 1 1.1.3.3 Subsystem IAT&CO 1.1.4 PMP IAT&CO 1.2 Platform IAT&CO 1.3 System Engineering 19

Software in MIL-STD-881C Appendix B provides a standard structure for lower-level software elements Structure 1.1.2 Release 1.0 Structure 1.1.2 PMP SW 1.1.2.1 1.1.2.2 SW ENG CSCI 1 VS 1.1.2.1 1.1.2.2 CSCI 1 CSCI 2 1.1.2.3 CSCI 2 1.1.2.3 CSCI 3 1.1.2.4 1.1.2.5 CSCI 3 SW IATC Previously used above or a Program-unique structure 20

Summary The must balance the needs of numerous stakeholders MIL-STD-881C increases both flexibility and standardization in development, though these can conflict Implications of MIL-STD-881C rollout are still being realized 21