BINGHAMTON FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT



Similar documents
Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

AOT (Assisted Outpatient Treatment) Court Orders

2012 Program Report. Agricultural Group Drainage Program

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Chapter 4. Flood Control

2012 Salary Survey Results

A JAILHOUSE LAWYER S MANUAL

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Development of Technical Data For Long Term Flood Solutions For the Red River Basin

Eldred Central School District

Investors Title Insurance Company - New York Approved Settlement Providers

Tookany Creek Flood Damage Reduction Feasibility Study Section 205 Continuing Authorities Program

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Lockport Pool Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Illinois Waterway

The Mississippi River & Tributaries Project

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC MODELING OF WESTMINSTER WATERSHED ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Westerly Creek, A Poster Child for Understanding the Benefit of Stormwater Investment

Lawyers caring. Lawyers sharing.

Health Plans by Counties and Boroughs

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN

Appendix C. Project Opportunities. Middle Twisp River (RM )

Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

TABLE OF CONTENTS. This document was prepared by. URS Group, Inc. 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD In Association with:

Greater Los Angeles County Region

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

St. Vrain Watershed Master Plan Thursday, January 23 10:00 a.m. 12:15 p.m.

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Monticello Central School District

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Conventional Plus/FHA Plus Programs Participating Lenders

Rates and the Choices pamphlets are also available online at employee-benefits.

Innovative Approaches in Flood Damage Reduction

Rouge River Watershed, MI Region 5. Community Case Study ROU-1. Number of CSO Outfalls. Combined Sewer Service Area. Wastewater Treatment Capacity

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

Aetna Small Business Health Plan Options

How to Become a Navy Engineer For $78,000 in USD

Naples Central School District

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

Alfred-Almond Central School District

DALLAS FLOODWAY TIMELINE

CLEARWATER DAM BLACK RIVER, MISSOURI MAJOR REHABILITATION STUDY

New York State Office of Mental Health Organization, Structure and Facilities

Tompkins-Seneca-Tioga Board of Cooperative Educational Services

River Management 2013 Colorado Flood

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

Prepared by. Drew Davidge

Hicksville Union Free School District

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

A JAILHOUSE LAWYER S MANUAL

West Islip Union Free School District

Capital Region BOCES

COMBINING RESOURCES FOR DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION

Queensbury Union Free School District

New York State Department of Health Division of Managed Care and Program Evaluation Managed Care Plan Directory

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

C. Owego RESTORE III Historic Central Business Restoration (W846) August 16, General Project Plan. Village of Owego ( Owego or the Village )

Flood Damage Prevention in Delaware County, NY

1. INTRODUCTION 5. THE PERMIT PROCESS

Watershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

ResearchBrief. Cleaning It Up: The Foreclosure Problem and the Response of Local Governments NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER.

Broadalbin-Perth Central School District

Village of Dannemora

Jackson Gulch Outlet Canal Rehabilitation Project

Health insurance coverage in upstate New York

DAMS ON THE GRAND RIVER*

Oklahoma Governor s Water Conference

Annual Conference Sponsorship and Exhibitor Opportunities

Health Sciences Charter School

Public Law and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

Transcription:

BINGHAMTON FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT Department of Environmental Conservation Region 7 Counties: Broome, Cayuga, Chenango, Cortland, Madison, Onondaga, Oswego, Tioga, Tompkins Operated and Maintained by: New York State PROJECT LOCATION The project lies almost entirely within the corporate limits of the city of Binghamton, county seat of Broome County, New York, and is located at the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers, 329 miles above the mouth of the Susquehanna River. Page 1 of 10

PROJECT DESCRIPTION The improvement consisted of constructing walls, levees, and appurtenant drainage structures where required along both banks of the Susquehanna and Chenango Rivers. Sections of floodwalls and levees previously constructed were raised and reinforced. The lower portions of Park, Pierce, Chamberlain, and Phelps Creeks were improved to provide protection from backwater flooding during high stages of the rivers. A detailed description of the several features is presented in subsequent sections of this report. AUTHORIZATION By enactment of the Flood Control Act approved June 22 nd, 1936 (Public Law No. 738, 74 th Congress), Congress authorized, Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning, and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers The floodprotection project at Binghamton, New York, constructed under this authority, as amended by the Flood Control Act approved June 28 th, 1938 (Public Law No. 761, 75 th Congress, third session), is a part of the comprehensive plan for flood control in the Upper Susquehanna River watershed in southern New York and eastern Pennsylvania. The general scope of this project is described in House Document No. 702, 77 th Congress, second session. PROTECTION PROVIDED The authorized plan of flood protection for Binghamton is based on the combination of local improvements with a system of retention reservoirs on tributaries upstream from the confluence of the Susquehanna and Chenango Rivers. Whitney Point Reservoir now controls 16% of the entire Chenango River watershed, or 6.6% of the combined Chenango and Susquehanna River watersheds at Binghamton. Two other reservoirs, Genegantslet and South Plymouth, on tributaries of the Chenango River, are authorized. These two reservoirs, in conjunction with Whitney Point Reservoir, will control 25% of the Chenango River watershed or 10% of the combined Chenango and Susquehanna River watersheds at Binghamton. In addition, four reservoirs on tributaries of the Susquehanna River above Binghamton area authorized and one of which, the East Sidney Reservoir, has been completed and has been in operation since 1950. These reservoirs will control 22% of the Susquehanna River watershed at Binghamton and will in conjunction with the three reservoirs mentioned above, control 23% of the combined Chenango and Susquehanna River watersheds at Binghamton. Page 2 of 10

The system of floodwalls and levees comprising the local improvement has increased the non-damaging capacity of the Chenango River from 42,000 c.f.s. to 75,000 c.f.s. and that of the Susquehanna River, above the confluence, from 50,000 c.f.s. to 80,000 c.f.s. The design capacity of the Susquehanna River downstream from the Chenango is 126,000 c.f.s. Completion of the authorized plan will protect various low lying industrial, commercial, residential, and recreational areas in and about the city from frequent flooding and eliminate an estimated 99 percent of the average annual flood losses. CONSTRUCTION Section No. 1. This unit comprising of protective facilities on the left bank of the Susquehanna River from high ground near Vestal Avenue below the Johnson-MacArthur athletic field, upstream to high ground at Livingston Street including Park Creek conduit, was constructed during the period from June 1940 to October 1941 by C.D. Murray and Company and Pepper Brothers of Syracuse, New York. Section No. 2. This unit includes protective measures at the following locations: The left bank of the Susquehanna River upstream from Rockbottom Bridge and along Pierce Creek. The right bank of the Susquehanna River from Washington Street bridge upstream to a point above Rockbottom Bridge. The left bank of the Chenango River upstream from Cutler Dam and along Phelps Creek. The right bank of the Chenango River upstream from McDonald Avenue. This unit was constructed during the period July 1940 to October 1941 by the Tuckahoe construction Company of Tuckahoe, New York. Section No. 3. This unit, consisting of new walls and raising and strengthening existing floodwalls, together with appurtenant structures, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River upstream from Tompkins Street Bridge, was constructed during the period from January to November 1941 by L. B. Strandberg and Son of Chicago, Illinois. Page 3 of 10

Section No. 4. This unit which includes the floodwalls and appurtenant structures along the left bank of the Chenango River from its confluence with the Susquehanna River upstream to Cutler Dam was constructed during the period from January to December 1943 by L. B. Strandberg and Son of Chicago, Illinois. Section No. 5. This unit comprising of levees and appurtenant structures on the right bank of Chamberlin St, was constructed during ther summer of 1942 by C.D. Murray and Co., of Syracuse New York. Subsequent contracts for the project entailed the additional work performed between 1949 and 1952: Clearing and snagging which included the removal of an abandoned dam, excavation of the Chenango River to prevent shoaling, and overbank clearing in Port Dickinson. Channel clearing and the partial removal of the Cutler Dam, excavation of a pilot channel, island removal, riprap protection in the Chenango River. Construction of flood barriers across Court St. and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad, on the right bank of Chamberlin Creek. Wall rehabilitation and construction from the Cutler Ice Plant to Front and Prospect Streets, and riprap protection along the right bank. The placement of a debris dam, concrete flume and construction of over 400 feet of levee. Page 4 of 10

BINGHAMTON GENERAL PLAN (A) Page 5 of 10

BINGHAMTON GENERAL PLAN (B) Page 6 of 10

BINGHAMTON BIRD S EYE VIEW (A) Page 7 of 10

BINGHAMTON BIRD S EYE VIEW (B) Page 8 of 10

BINGHAMTON GENERAL PLAN AND AERIAL MAP OVERLAY (A) Page 9 of 10

BINGHAMTON C&S GENERAL PLAN AND AERIAL MAP OVERLAY Page 10 of 10