CTEMS Member Monthly Webcast May 2012

Similar documents
Introducing Telapprise

Verizon Unified Communications and Collaboration as a Service Service Level Agreement ( SLA )

SIP TRUNKING CHECKLIST

HOW IT WORKS: THE GOVERNMENT EMERGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE Introduction

How To Make A Cell Phone Converged Into A Cell Network

INDUSTRIAL VENTURES III

Enterprises have turned to cloud-based applications

US Business Services 2015

SPRINT SIP TRUNKING SERVICE PRODUCT ANNEX

... How will today s enterprise evolve their mobile strategy? AT&T Global Mobile Management Bring Order to Your Mobile Environment

THE INDUSTRY How have technological changes affected the telecommunications industry, including entities that want to make automated calls?

VERIZON RAPID DELIVERY NOT SO FAST. Written by: Deb Boehling and Laura McDonald, Levine, Blaszak, Block and Boothby LLP

Text (SMS) Banking. Access your accounts from any text-enabled mobile phone to view balances and transaction history.

Moving to the Cloud Eric Tamblyn, VP Global Product Innovations

Business Services Market Share 2015

Maximize Telecom Savings with TEM Business Process Outsourcing

Veramark White Paper: Reducing Telecom Costs Why Invoice Management is the Best Place to Start. WhitePaper. We innovate. You benefit.

Next Generation Telecom Expense Management

Positions & Qualifications

A Whole New Level: Emerging Business Models Designed to Improve Your Revenue Stream Monday, October 8, :30-3:15 p.m.

APPENDIX 9 TO SCHEDULE 3.3

Industry Survey: Trends in Enterprise Cellular Network Data Usage

Partner & Carrier Portfolio

Telecom Provider List Voice and data carriers sold

Managed Services 2015

Sprint for Cable Operators. Capturing more business with exceptional voice telephony services

November Defining the Value of Ethernet Services

Telepresence and Videoconferencing Insight Newsletter Copyright by Videoconferencing Insight Newsletter, IMP Publications, UK.

How the Cloud can help customer experience management

Global Implementation of Fixed and Wireless Telecom Expense Management Programs. January Underwritten by:

Impact Telecom Commercial Services

The Yorkshire SME Internet Connectivity and Business Growth Survey 2015

On the call today from MIND is Mrs. Monica Iancu, MIND's CEO, who will summarize our major achievements in 2013 and discuss our business.

The Benefits of Hosted VoIP Phone Service for a Distributed Workforce

US WIRELESS & WIRELINE VOICE: THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES

At the PAC, how many ports are in each of the 3 Catalyst 3560G switches. Do you know how many IP phones will be assigned to each of the switches?

Country Club Bank- Mobile Banking FAQs

CDMA + Code Dialing Options

Service. Strategic Technology Solutions for DNA Technology Solutions and Services That Help You Optimize System Performance, Security and Availability

Meeting the challenge of voice services

The Evolution of TEM to CLM: How to Deliver Value through Effective Management across your Communications Lifecycle

Bell Voice and Unified Communications Solutions. Professional services overview

GARTNER REPORT: SIP TRUNKING

How SIP for Enterprise Powers Unified Communications

Mobile Payments: The Market for Travelers, Unbanked, and No/Low Credit Users

U.S. Communications Service Provider Quarterly

Telecom Expense Management

Introduction to City of Seattle Business Survey

North American VoIP Access and SIP Trunking Services Markets

Delivering Dependable QoS for Better Bottom Line

8x8, Inc. (Nasdaq: EGHT) Corporate Overview

High Availability Private Network (HAPN ) Network Upgrade Case Study

SPRINT COMPLETE COLLABORATION WITH MICROSOFT LYNC SERVICE PRODUCT ANNEX

Lee Barnes, CTO Utopia Solutions. Utopia Solutions

How Convergence of IT, Telecom and. the M&A Market

NetWolves C ompany Company Overview

Simplifying Mobility Management. WhitePaper VERAMARK 2013 TEM SERIES, #3

The Business Case for Unified Communications November 2013

Fixed Wireless 101: County and Municipal Opportunity Overview. by Rory Conaway Triad Wireless

Are Hosted Video Conferencing Services Enough?

Sota Solutions was established in 1989 and delivers networking and communications solutions mainly to business customers across the UK.

Technology Needs Assessment Survey

How to Choose a Managed Network Services Provider

Transcription:

CTEMS Member Monthly Webcast May 2012 Presented by: Timothy C. Colwell, Executive Director, CTEMS 1

1. Welcome & Introductions 2. CTEMS Mission 3. Industry Trends Satisfaction with Carrier Performance Carrier Management Strategies Carrier Technology Adoption 4. Reminders 2

1. Satisfaction with Carrier Performance Serves to identify s exhibiting excellence and s requiring attention to improve customers fixed and mobile telecom management performance Fixed and mobile telecom management performance is influenced by four core contributors: Enterprises fixed and mobile telecom management practices Carriers telecom network services Suppliers TEM/ WMM / MDM technology and managed services Vendors telecom infrastructure equipment and services 7

2. Carrier Management Strategies Enterprises are required to manage their s to protect their business interests Understanding management trends enables identification of management excellence and performance opportunities 3. Carrier Technology Adoption As technology evolves, adoption of new technology and technology applications occur Understanding the rate of technology adoption enables identification of fixed and mobile telecom management activities that require change or updates to support new technology 8

Supplier Members 9

AT&T 85% Verizon 63% Sprint 39% CenturyLink 17% Windstream 17% Granite 15% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 10

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 7.83 7.38 7.29 7.27 7.26 6.29 Granite AT&T Windstream Sprint Verizon CenturyLink Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 11

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 7.83 7.13 7.00 6.71 6.62 6.29 Granite Verizon Sprint Windstream AT&T CenturyLink Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 12

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 7.83 7.75 7.25 7.57 7.52 6.83 6.86 7.53 7.62 7.29 7.40 7.56 7.14 7.14 7.29 7.19 7.19 6.86 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Granite CenturyLink AT&T Sprint Windstream Verizon Local Voice Long Distance Data 13

AT&T Wireless 72% Verizon Wireless 70% Sprint PCS 20% T Mobile 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 14

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 7.22 7.21 7.14 Sprint PCS AT&T Wireless Verizon Wireless Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 15

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 7.22 7.21 7.17 AT&T Wireless Verizon Wireless Sprint PCS Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 16

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 7.23 7.39 7.39 6.85 6.82 6.73 6.89 6.89 7.11 8.10 8.00 7.97 7.54 7.48 7.43 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 n/a n/a n/a AT&T Wireless Sprint PCS Verizon Wireless Domestic Voice Domestic Data Domestic SMS / Text Int'l Voice Int'l Data Int'l SMS / Text 17

2% 26% 72% Yes No Don't know 18

Billing Dispute Resolution Reviews 91% Rate Reviews 85% SLA Performance Reviews 76% Help Desk / Trouble Ticket Reviews 71% Future Technology Planning Reviews 62% Capacity Planning Reviews 56% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 19

Network Up Time 70% Customer Service Response Times 46% Customer Service Issue Resolution Times 42% Contract Performance 38% Billing Accuracy 22% NONE Do Not Have SLA's 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 20

Sourcing / Procurement 31% IT 23% Telecom 23% Don't Know 15% Vendor Management / Carrier Relations 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 21

Enterprise Members 22

AT&T 77% Verizon 61% CenturyLink 38% Sprint 19% Windstream Granite Frontier 8% 11% 14% Time Warner Telecom Level 3 XO Communications Optimum LightPath 3% 3% 2% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 23

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 8.44 8.10 8.01 7.87 7.46 7.44 6.93 Granite Sprint CenturyLink Windstream Frontier AT&T Verizon Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 24

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 7.83 8.44 7.87 8.10 8.01 7.38 7.44 7.29 7.27 7.26 6.93 6.29 Granite AT&T Windstream Sprint Verizon CenturyLink Suppliers Enterprises Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 25

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 8.19 7.75 7.73 7.73 6.85 6.42 6.19 Granite CenturyLink Sprint Windstream AT&T Frontier Verizon Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 26

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 7.83 8.19 7.73 7.73 7.13 7.00 6.71 6.85 6.62 6.19 6.29 7.75 Granite Verizon Sprint Windstream AT&T CenturyLink Suppliers Enterprises Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 27

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 8.31 7.71 7.50 7.43 7.15 6.80 6.56 Granite CenturyLink Windstream Sprint Frontier AT&T Verizon Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 28

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 8.44 9.00 9.50 7.60 7.56 7.96 8.03 8.03 7.89 7.28 7.47 7.65 7.25 7.00 6.80 6.67 6.86 7.85 8.08 6.86 6.75 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Granite Sprint CenturyLink AT&T Frontier Verizon Windstream Local Voice Long Distance Data 29

Verizon Wireless 72% AT&T Wireless 70% Sprint PCS 36% T Mobile 3% Vodaphone 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 30

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 8.36 8.14 7.68 Sprint PCS Verizon Wireless AT&T Wireless Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 31

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 8.36 8.14 7.68 7.22 7.21 7.14 Sprint PCS AT&T Wireless Verizon Wireless Suppliers Enterprises Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 32

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 8.34 7.85 7.63 Sprint PCS Verizon Wireless AT&T Wireless Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 33

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 7.63 7.85 7.22 7.21 7.17 AT&T Wireless Verizon Wireless Sprint PCS Suppliers Enterprises 8.34 Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 34

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 8.21 7.50 7.19 Sprint PCS Verizon Wireless AT&T Wireless Carrier Satisfaction Interpretation (9 10) Highly Satisfied Satisfaction achieved Rating participant is highly likely to (7 8) Somewhat Satisfied Mild satisfaction levels present Satisfaction indifference overall indicating rating participant is less likely to (1 6) Not at All Satisfied Varied degrees of dissatisfaction Rating participant is not likely to provide a positive recommendation 35

10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 7.83 7.58 7.86 7.31 8.21 8.30 8.27 8.06 7.99 8.08 7.68 7.16 7.26 7.13 7.29 7.24 7.22 7.30 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 AT&T Wireless Sprint PCS Verizon Wireless Domestic Voice Domestic Data Domestic SMS / Text Int'l Voice Int'l Data Int'l SMS / Text 36

Rate Reviews 82% Billing Dispute Resolution Reviews 80% Future Technology Planning Reviews 74% SLA Performance Reviews 66% Help Desk / Trouble Ticket Reviews 61% Capacity Planning Reviews 51% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 37

Network Up Time 63% Customer Service Response Times 50% Customer Service Issue Resolution Times 49% Contract Performance 39% Billing Accuracy 31% Don't Know 13% NONE Do Not Have SLA's 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 38

Telecom 57% IT 27% Sourcing / Procurement 7% Vendor Management / Carrier Relations 5% Finance 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 39

Finance 0% 3% Sourcing / Procurement 7% 31% IT Telecom 23% 27% 23% 57% Don't Know 0% 15% Vendor Management / Carrier Relations 8% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Suppliers Enterprises 40

90% 80% 70% 60% 81% 73% 66% 62% 50% 40% 39% 37% 34% 34% 30% 20% 10% 19% 10% 0% 41

SIP Trunking (or more SIP) 62% VoIP (or more VoIP) 19% MPLS 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 42

100% 90% 80% 70% 90% 87% 85% 81% 72% 70% 64% 60% 55% 50% 40% 30% 39% 28% 20% 10% 0% 43

Tablets (more tablets) 21% SmartPhones (or more smartphones) 10% Machine to Machine 10% LTE 10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 44

47