P W SCF s epsilon.x user s manual

Similar documents
Optical Properties of Solids. Claudia Ambrosch-Draxl Chair of Atomistic Modelling and Design of Materials University Leoben, Austria

Analysis, post-processing and visualization tools

A Beginner s Guide to Materials Studio and DFT Calculations with Castep. P. Hasnip (pjh503@york.ac.uk)

The quantum mechanics of particles in a periodic potential: Bloch s theorem

DATA ANALYSIS II. Matrix Algorithms

n 2 + 4n + 3. The answer in decimal form (for the Blitz): 0, 75. Solution. (n + 1)(n + 3) = n lim m 2 1

State of Stress at Point

Elasticity Theory Basics

First Step : Identifying Pseudopotentials

Lecture 3: Optical Properties of Bulk and Nano. 5 nm

Statistical Physics, Part 2 by E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii (volume 9 of Landau and Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics).

Specific Intensity. I ν =

Free Electron Fermi Gas (Kittel Ch. 6)

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 8 Dec 2015

The Phenomenon of Photoelectric Emission:

= N 2 = 3π2 n = k 3 F. The kinetic energy of the uniform system is given by: 4πk 2 dk h2 k 2 2m. (2π) 3 0

Contents. Goldstone Bosons in 3He-A Soft Modes Dynamics and Lie Algebra of Group G:

Introduction to SME and Scattering Theory. Don Colladay. New College of Florida Sarasota, FL, 34243, U.S.A.

UNIT I: INTRFERENCE & DIFFRACTION Div. B Div. D Div. F INTRFERENCE

MATH APPLIED MATRIX THEORY

DFT in practice : Part I. Ersen Mete

HW6 Solutions Notice numbers may change randomly in your assignments and you may have to recalculate solutions for your specific case.

ENERGY TRANSFER IN THE WEAK AND STRONG COUPLING REGIME

3. Derive the partition function for the ideal monoatomic gas. Use Boltzmann statistics, and a quantum mechanical model for the gas.

Chapter 22: Electric Flux and Gauss s Law

COURSE: PHYSICS DEGREE: COMPUTER ENGINEERING year: 1st SEMESTER: 1st

Plate waves in phononic crystals slabs

FYS Vår 2014 (Kondenserte fasers fysikk)

Lecture 3: Optical Properties of Bulk and Nano. 5 nm

6 J - vector electric current density (A/m2 )

Till now, almost all attention has been focussed on discussing the state of a quantum system.

F en = mω 0 2 x. We should regard this as a model of the response of an atom, rather than a classical model of the atom itself.

Concept 2. A. Description of light-matter interaction B. Quantitatities in spectroscopy

A Simple Pseudo Random Number algorithm

LS.6 Solution Matrices

PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Test 3 November 22, 2004

SOLID STATE PHYSICS. PART II Optical Properties of Solids. M. S. Dresselhaus

5: Magnitude 6: Convert to Polar 7: Convert to Rectangular

Name Date Class ELECTRONS IN ATOMS. Standard Curriculum Core content Extension topics

CBE 6333, R. Levicky 1 Differential Balance Equations

Instability, dispersion management, and pattern formation in the superfluid flow of a BEC in a cylindrical waveguide

Accuracy of the coherent potential approximation for a onedimensional array with a Gaussian distribution of fluctuations in the on-site potential

Resistivity. V A = R = L ρ (1)

Chapter 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Hans de Vries

Differential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation

Widths of spectral lines

Algebra 2 Chapter 1 Vocabulary. identity - A statement that equates two equivalent expressions.

Examples of Uniform EM Plane Waves

Lecture 8. Generating a non-uniform probability distribution

Does Quantum Mechanics Make Sense? Size

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Electromagnetism Laws and Equations

Group Theory and Chemistry

Let s first see how precession works in quantitative detail. The system is illustrated below: ...

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PHYSICS MASTER OF SCIENCES IN PHYSICS (MS PHYS) (LIST OF COURSES BY SEMESTER, THESIS OPTION)

- particle with kinetic energy E strikes a barrier with height U 0 > E and width L. - classically the particle cannot overcome the barrier

Frequency domain application of the Hot-Spot method for the fatigue assessment of the weld seams

Operation Count; Numerical Linear Algebra

Feynman diagrams. 1 Aim of the game 2

Physics 9e/Cutnell. correlated to the. College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives

The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb

CURVE FITTING LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATION

Three Pictures of Quantum Mechanics. Thomas R. Shafer April 17, 2009

Special Theory of Relativity

Electrostatic Fields: Coulomb s Law & the Electric Field Intensity

Transport through a quantum wire with a side quantum-dot array

NMR and IR spectra & vibrational analysis

1 Determinants and the Solvability of Linear Systems

Sampling the Brillouin-zone:

Vector Math Computer Graphics Scott D. Anderson

PHYS 1624 University Physics I. PHYS 2644 University Physics II

FYS Vår 2015 (Kondenserte fasers fysikk)

The waveguide adapter consists of a rectangular part smoothly transcending into an elliptical part as seen in Figure 1.

ELECTRIC FIELD LINES AND EQUIPOTENTIAL SURFACES

arxiv: v2 [physics.acc-ph] 27 Oct 2014

AMPLIFICATION OF ATOMIC WAVES BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF ATOMS. Christian J. Borde

The Quantum ESPRESSO Software Distribution

Apertureless Near-Field Optical Microscopy

Symmetric Stretch: allows molecule to move through space

On eigenvalue surfaces near a diabolic point

10.2 Series and Convergence

WAVES AND ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION

Probability and Random Variables. Generation of random variables (r.v.)

Chapter 22: The Electric Field. Read Chapter 22 Do Ch. 22 Questions 3, 5, 7, 9 Do Ch. 22 Problems 5, 19, 24

Rotation: Moment of Inertia and Torque

Analysis of Electromagnetic Propulsion on a Two-Electric-Dipole System

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

1 of 79 Erik Eberhardt UBC Geological Engineering EOSC 433

The properties of an ideal Fermi gas are strongly determined by the Pauli principle. We shall consider the limit: µ >> k B T βµ >> 1,

SCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND LORENTZ VIOLATION DON COLLADAY

Meson cloud effects in the electromagnetic hadron structure

5.3 The Cross Product in R 3

DO PHYSICS ONLINE FROM QUANTA TO QUARKS QUANTUM (WAVE) MECHANICS

The Quantum Theory of the Emission and Absorption of Radiation.

FYS Vår 2015 (Kondenserte fasers fysikk)

MBA 611 STATISTICS AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS

Lab 4: Magnetic Force on Electrons

Project 1: Rectangular Waveguide (HFSS)

FACTOR ANALYSIS NASC

CLASSIFICATION OF TOPOLOGICAL INSULATORS AND SUPERCONDUCTORS, RESPONSES AND QUANTUM ANOMALIES

Transcription:

P W SCF s epsilon.x user s manual Manual Author: Andrea Benassi 1,2 Code Developers: Andrea Benassi 1,2, Andrea Ferretti 1,2, Carlo Cavazzoni 2,3 1 Physics Department, Universitá degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, www.fisica.unimore.it 2 INFM/S 3 (Nanostructure and Biosystem at Surfaces), www.s3.infm.it 3 High Performance Computing Department, CINECA Consorzio Interuniversitario, www.cineca.it

1 Introduction Epsilon.x is a post processing code of P W SCF. Starting from DFT eigenvalues and eigenvectors, epsilon.x provides the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric tensor or the joint density of states, it wors both in serial and parallel mode, also pool parallelization is supported. As all the others post processing codes, epsilon.x must run with the same number of processors of the previews parallel PW runs, to avoid this constrain set the variable WF COLLECT=.TRUE. in pw.x input file. Epsilon.x doesn t support the reduction of the -points grid into the unreducible Brillouin zone, so the previous PW runs must be performed with a uniform -points grid and all -points weights must be equal to each other, i.e. in the - points card the -points coordinates must be given manually in crystal or alat or bohr, but not with the automatic option. Also the auto-symmetrization of -points grid can produce a non uniform distribution of -points weights, in order to avoid this PW s behavior the variable NOSYM must be set.true. disabling auto-symmetrization. 2 Input file When executed, epsilon.x reads an input file from standard input, this file contains two Fortran namelists (value associated to each variable is the default one): &inputpp outdir=./ prefix= pwscf calculation= eps / &energy_grid smeartype= gauss intersmear=.136d intrasmear=.d wmax=3.d wmin=.d nw=6 shift=.d / the first two characters are the location and name of the output files from the previous PW runs. calculation select the ind of calculation to be performed by epsilon.x, actually the following calculation are implemented: eps: dielectric tensor calculation, in addition to the standard output the code produces the four files epsr.dat, epsi.dat, eels.dat and ieps.dat. The first two contain the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric tensor diagonal components ɛ 1α,α (ω) e ɛ 2α,α (ω), as a function of frequency (in ev). The third file contains the electron energy loss spectrum calculated from the diagonal elements of dielectric tensor and the last one contains the diagonal components of dielectric tensor calculated on the imaginary axe of frequency (via London transformation) ɛ α,α (iω). If the PW calculations have been performed in collinear spin mode the previous files contain the sum of spin up and spin down contribution, other files with prefix u- or d- are created containing the same quantities for spin up or spin down separately. jdos: joint density of state calculation, in addition to the standard output the code produces the file jdos.dat, containing the joint density of state (in ev 1 ) as a function of frequency (in ev). If the PW calculations have been performed in collinear spin mode, jdos.dat contains separately the spin up and spin down joind donsity of states. offdiag: calculation of diagonal and off-diagonal components of dielectric tensor. In addition to the standard output the code produces one file for each component of the dielectric tensor (i.e. epsxy.dat), each file contains real and imaginary part of the tensor component. occ: calculation of occupation factors and its first derivative, results are written on occupations.dat. In metallic systems it is highly raccomanded to permorm this calculation before enything else. Plotting this file it is easy to see if the chosen broadening parameter and points 1

number are enough to have a good sampling of the fermi surface. smeartype select the ind of broadening for the plot of joint density of state, it can be both gauss or lorentz for a aussian or Lorentzian broadening. intersmear is the broadening parameter (in ev) for the interband contribution, it will be the aussian or Lorentzian broadening parameter in the case of joint density of state calculation or the Drude-Lorentz broadening parameter for the dielectric tensor calculation. intrasmear is the broadening parameter for the intraband, i.e. metal Drude lie term (again in ev), the intraband contribution is calculated only if a aussian broadening or tetrahedron method it s been applied in PW calculations. The desired functions will be calculated in a frequency interval [ -wmax,wmax ] and nw is the number of points of the frequency mesh, wmax is expected to be in ev. Finally shift is the number of ev for an optional rigid shift of the imaginary part of the dielectric function. 3 Joint density of states The joint density of state is defined has: n(ω) = (2π) 3 d 3 δ(e,n E,n ω) σ n V n C or alternatively: n(ω) = n or finally: n(ω) = n V n (2π) 3 d 3 δ(e,n E,n ω) f(e,n )[2 f(e,n )]/2 n C (2π) 3 (1) d 3 δ(e,n E,n ω) [f(e,n ) f(e,n )] (2) were σ is the spin component, is the volume of the lattice cell, n and n belong respectively to the valence and conduction bands, E,n are the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian and f(e,n ) is the Fermi distribution function that account for the occupation of the bands. In the last two notation the sum over spin values is included into Fermi function whose normalization is two instead of one. The Dirac Delta function it s numerically implemented by means of Lorentzian or aussian functions normalized to one: L(ω) = Γ π [ (E,n E,n ω) 2 + Γ2] (3) (ω) = 1 Γ π e(e,n E,n ω) 2 /Γ 2 (4) (2π) 3 d 3 by a simple sun over -points. Γ is the broadening parameter from the input file. The implemented formula is obtained substituting the Dirac Delta function in (2) by (3) or (4) and substituting Integrating analytically (2) one obtains: n n [f(e,n ) f(e,n )] (5) so a division by this quantity is needed to renormalize to one the joint density of state, the standard output file contains a convergence chec on this renormalizzazion. Note that in the case of joint density of state the two inds of broadening (3) and (4) are exactly equivalent. 4 Dielectric tensor The imaginary part of the dielectric tensor ɛ 2α,β (ω) can be viewed as a response function that comes from a perturbation theory with adiabatic turning on: ɛ α,β (ω) = 1 + n,n (E,n E,n ) 2 { f(e,n ) E,n E,n + ω + i Γ + } f(e,n ) E,n E,n ω i Γ (6) where Γ is the adiabatic parameter and, for the total energy conservation it must tend to zero. This is the 2

way in which the Dirac Delta function appears and this means that every excited state has an infinite lifetime, i.e. is stationary. ɛ 2α,β (ω) = n,n f(e,n ) (E,n E,n ) 2 [ ] δ(e,n E,n + ω) + δ(e,n E,n ω) (7) This situation is unphysical because the interaction with electromagnetic field (even in the absence of photons, i.e. spontaneous emission) gives an intrinsic broadening to all exited states, the lifetime is finite and Γ must be greater than zero. In the limit of small but non vanishing Γ the dielectric tensor turns into the Drude-Lorentz one: ɛ 2α,β (ω) = + 8πe2 n, n n df(e,n ) de,n ηω ω 4 + η 2 ω 2 + E,n E,n Γωf(E,n ) [ (ω,n ω,n ) 2 ω 2] 2 (8) + Γ2 ω 2 while the real part comes from the Kramers-Kronig transformation: ɛ 1α,β (ω) = 1 ɛ 1α,β (ω) = 1 + 2 π + 8πe2 n, n n ω ɛ 2α,β (ω ) ω 2 ω 2 dω (9) df(e,n ) de,n ω 2 ˆMα,β ω 4 + η 2 ω 2 + E,n E,n [ (ω,n ω,n ) 2 ω 2] f(e,n ) [ (ω,n ω,n ) 2 ω 2] 2 (1) + Γ2 ω 2 finally the complex dielectric function is: ɛ α,β (ω) = 1 n, df(e,n ) de,n ˆMα,β ω 2 + iηω + + 8πe2 n n (E,n E,n ) f(e,n ) (ω,n ω,n ) 2 + ω 2 + iγω Γ and η are respectively intersmear and intrasmear. The squared matrix elements are defined as follow: = u,n ˆp α u,n u,n ˆp β u,n (11) u,n (r) d dx α u,n (r)u,n(r) d dx β u,n (r) (12) the double index reveals the tensorial nature of ɛ 2 (ω), while u,n is a factor of the single particle Bloch function obtained by the PW s DFT calculation. In all the cases illustrated above the non-local contribution due to the pseudopotential is neglected, actually the correction to the matrix element that tae into account the non-local part of the Hamiltonian it s not implemented. From the previews definition of the imaginary part of the dielectric function it is easy to see that even the local-field contributions are not implemented. PW wors on a plane wave set so the Bloch functions of the matrix element (11) are decomposed as follow: ψ,n = e i r u,n = 1 a n,, e i(+) r (13) V and consequently: ( )( ) = a n,,a n,, α a n,,a n,, β (14) defined in this way the matrix element accounts only for interband transitions, i.e. vertical transition in which the electron momentum is conserved (optical approximation). In standard optics the intraband transitions give a neglectable contribution due to the very low momentum transfered by the incoming/outcoming photon. Operating a London transformation upon ɛ 2α,β (ω), it s possible to obtain the whole dielectric tensor calculated on the imaginary frequency axe ɛ α,β (iω). ɛ α,β (iω) = 1 + 2 π ω ɛ 2α,β (ω ) ω 2 + ω 2 dω (15) 3

The LOSS spectrum is proportional to the imaginary of the inverse dielectric tensor, that is: { } 1 ɛ 2α,β (ω) Imm = ɛ α,β (ω) ɛ 2 1 α,β (ω) + ɛ 2 (16) 2 α,β (ω) this quantity provides a useful chec of the dielectric tensor calculation because it reaches its maximum at the bul plasmon frequency p, where the real and imaginary parts cross their paths at higher frequency. The same quantity (in ev) is numerically evaluated using the following sum rule: ωɛ 2α,β (ω)dω = π 2 p (17) The result of this calculation is printed in the standard output file. 4