Understanding Exposure and Deviation Indices

Similar documents
The Exposure Index and Its Standardization

Study the Quality Assurance of Conventional X-ray Machines Using Non Invasive KV meter

Physics testing of image detectors

Understanding Digital Modalities: System Integration and Use

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION APPARATUS

Irradiation Field Size: 5cmX5cm 10cmX10cm 15cmX15cm 20cmX20cm. Focus-Surface Distance: 100cm. 20cm Volume of Ion Chamber : 1cmX1cmX1cm

Production of X-rays. Radiation Safety Training for Analytical X-Ray Devices Module 9

X-ray Production. Target Interactions. Principles of Imaging Science I (RAD119) X-ray Production & Emission

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION APPARATUS

INTRODUCTION. A. Purpose

Name: Date: Team: Lab Experiment # 3. Focused Grid Positioning Errors. Computed Radiography and Direct Digital Radiography

Diagnostic Exposure Tracking in the Medical Record

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION SOURCES

Role of the Medical Physicist in Clinical Implementation of Breast Tomosynthesis

Radiography: 2D and 3D Metrics of Performance Towards Quality Index

CT: Size Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE): Why We Need Another CT Dose Index. Acknowledgements

Quality Control and Maintenance Programs

CHAPTER 5 QC Test For Radiographic Equipment. Prepared by:- Kamarul Amin bin Abu Bakar School of Medical Imaging KLMUC

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION APPARATUS

Digital radiography has become the norm in U.S.

GE Healthcare. DoseWatch. Gathering Radiation Dose Data

Manual for Accreditation of Agencies for Quality Assurance of Diagnostic X-ray Equipment

A software tool for Quality Assurance of Computed / Digital Radiography (CR/DR) systems

Production of X-rays and Interactions of X-rays with Matter

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis QC Requirements

DICOM Correction Item

Radiographic Grid. Principles of Imaging Science II (RAD 120) Image-Forming X-Rays. Radiographic Grids

CT RADIATION DOSE REPORT FROM DICOM. Frank Dong, PhD, DABR Diagnostic Physicist Imaging Institute Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland, OH

5.2 ASSESSMENT OF X-RAY TUBE LEAKAGE RADIATION AND X-RAY TUBE OUTPUT TOTAL FILTRATION

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION APPARATUS

EPA Protocols: Compliance testing of dental X-ray apparatus used for plain radiography

Digital Image Processing with DragonflyPACS

Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Intraoral Radiography: Hand-Held Held (Nomad), Battery Powered

Page: 1 of 6 Page: 1 of 6

Performance testing for Precision 500D Classical R/F System

Design and Implementation of an Institution-Wide Patient-Specific Radiation Dose

Use of the VALIDATOR Dosimetry System for Quality Assurance and Quality Control of Blood Irradiators

Measuring Size and Distance in Digital Mammography

Update on ACR Digital Mammography QC Manual

SWABIK Project. Software Tools for DICOM Media Exchange in Clinical Research: the. SWABIK Project

Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study

Gestión global de la dosis en TC. Sistema de registro y gestión

IGRT. IGRT can increase the accuracy by locating the target volume before and during the treatment.

Tracking Radiation Exposure From Medical Diagnostic Procedures: Siemens Perspectives

Using Automatic Exposure Control in Digital Radiography

Quality control tests of diagnostic radiology equipment in Hungary, and its radiation protection aspects

Dose Measurement in Mammography; What are we measuring? David E. Hintenlang, Ph.D. DABR University of Florida

Qualitätsmanagement-Handbuch

A PACS-Aware DICOM Image Object

7üVNORD. TÜV NORD Röntgentechnik

Application of Digital Radiography for the Detection and Classification of Pneumoconiosis

Best Practices in Digital Radiography

The effects of radiation on the body can be divided into Stochastic (random) effects and deterministic or Non-stochastic effects.

Comparing dose and image quality of a conventional 400 speed class film/screen system with a CR system by assessing pediatric chest examinations

An Overview of Digital Imaging Systems for Radiography and Fluoroscopy

Assessing Radiation Dose: How to Do It Right

ACR AAPM SIIM PRACTICE PARAMETER FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY

RADIATION THERAPY. Dosimetry Pioneers since 1922 NEW

IAEA-TECDOC-1447 Optimization of the radiological protection of patients: Image quality and dose in mammography (coordinated research in Europe)

Indirect X-ray photon counting image sensor with 27T pixels and 15 electrons RMS accurate threshold

Patient Exposure Doses During Diagnostic Radiography

Digital radiography exposure indices: A review

Image Acquisition and Diagnostics

Agency for Health Care Administration

Digital Dental X-ray. Midmark Animal Health Products

MediCal QAWeb. Secured online service for Quality Assurance of medical displays

The convenient and compact CR system for veterinary practices

Elements of required physical infrastructures: space, schielding, and patient flow..

Barracuda & QABrowser

DENTAL Cone beam 3D X-RAY SYSTEM with

Standards for accreditation of educational programs and approval of continuing education courses.

Computed Radiography: Acceptance Testing and Quality Control

Security Imaging Systems (X-Ray): Design, Measurements Regulations, and Standards

Multi-slice Helical CT Scanning of the Chest

QUALITY CONTROL IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY

I.7. SOFT TECHNIQUE STILL IN USE IN CHEST RADIOGRAPHY PROS AND CONS

Thinking ahead. Focused on life. REALIZED: GROUNDBREAKING RESOLUTION OF 80 µm VOXEL

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Recommendations for a technical quality control program for diagnostic X-ray equipment

Required RS Training Info

Introduction. Digital Mammography Detector QC FFDM. What is FFDM QC and why is it. important? What to know before you start. Eric A. Berns, Ph.D.

EDXRF of Used Automotive Catalytic Converters

PRACTICAL TIPS IN ENSURING RADIATION SAFETY IN THE USE OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT

X-Mind. Instinct for perfection

Digital radiography conquers the veterinary world

The Convenient and Compact CR System for Veterinary Practices

X-ray (Radiography) - Abdomen

Implementation of Cone-beam CT imaging for Radiotherapy treatment localisation.

Checklist for the Qualification of Digital Detector Array Systems

EPEX. The Hologic EPEX General. Direct-to-Digital System for General Radiography. Versatility for a complete range of general radiographic exams

Equipment. Lin muyan. Presented by: CocticaUwititonze Cell:+250 (0)

SUMMARY OF CURRENT UK LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES

RADIATION SAFETY STANDARD

CAR Standards for Teleradiology

Radiation Dose Measurements in Routine X ray Examinations

AN INNOVATIVE & CUTTING-EDGE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM

TA3 Dosimetry and Instrumentation. Evaluation of the Field Size in Dental Diagnostic Radiology System ANDRADE PS 1, POTIENS MP 1

Learning Objectives: Quality Assurance (QA) is. Quality Assurance Procedures for Digital Radiography. Alternate definition of Quality Assurance (QA)

portable x-ray survey report

Transcription:

Imaging Educational Course - Radiography III Understanding Exposure and Deviation Indices David L. Leong 1,2 Marie-Louise Butler 2 1 Analogic Corporation, Peabody, MA, USA 2 UCD School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland AAPM 2011 WE-A-110-1 Learning Objectives 1. Understand AAPM recommendations, 2. Understand the IEC standard, 3. Understand factors that affect Exposure and Deviation Index values. 4. Understand DICOM support for Exposure and Deviation Index values. 2 1

State of Confusion Manufacturer Specific Indices Rex S lgm EI DEI EXI EVI f# A range of units and relationships to exposure. Calibration conditions ranged from 70 to 80 kvp with different filtration selections 3 AAPM Task Group 116 TG116 was started in July 25, 2004 Report published June 2009 29 individuals participated in the Task Group Full report available on AAPM Website http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/ Executive summary published in Medical Physics S. J. Shepard et al. "An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (Executive Summary)," Med. Phys. 36, 2898-2914 (2009). http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/ 4 2

IEC Working Group 43/62b Preparatory work in the German (DIN) standardization organization 2004-2006 Proposal for standard by the German National Committee June 2006 WG43 was started in September 2006 Experts from Germany, Belgium, Canada, China, Japan, Netherlands, United States 16 members, 6 people overlapped with TG116 First meeting October 2006 in Hamburg, Germany IEC 62494-1 published August 2008 Stability date: 2012 5 Keys Parts Exposure Index Target Exposure Index Deviation Index Calibration Condition 6 3

Exposure Index Name IEC 62494 Exposure Index (EI) AAPM TG116 Indicated Equivalent Air Kerma (K ind ) Units Unitless μgy Precision Not specified 3 significant Different definitions, but substantially the same. K ind typically less than 1 as it is μgy EI is designed to be greater than 1 7 Exposure Index Formulas IEC: CAL 1 1 K f V g V f V V f K CAL CAL CAL -1 1 EI c0 g V 100μGy f V TG116: K STD K STD Q K 1000 log10 1000 log10 K 0 0.001 Q 1000 IND 0 0 K K 10, where K 0.001 Gy 8 4

Target Exposure Index Target values: K TGT (TG116) and EI T (IEC) EI T expected value of EI when the detector is properly exposed Manufacturer / Site Specified Needs to be adjustable by user Can be established by professional societies Body part and view specific targets (recommended by TG116) 9 Deviation Index IEC 62494 AAPM TG116 Name Deviation Index (EI) Deviation Index (EI) Units Unitless Unitless Precision Not specified 1 decimal place TG116 and IEC are the same: DI EI 10 log EI T More important clinically than EI 10 5

Action Levels (TG116) DI Table 2. Exposure Indicator DI Control Limits for Clinical Images Range Action > +3.0 Excessive patient radiation exposure Repeat only if relevant anatomy is clipped or burned out Require immediate management followup. +1 to +3.0 Overexposure: Repeat only if relevant anatomy is clipped or burned out 0.5 to +0.5 Target range Less than 1.0 Underexposed: Consult radiologist for repeat Less than 3.0 Repeat 11 Calibration IEC kvp: 66 74 Based on RQA5 from IEC 61267 HVL: 6.8 ± 0.3 mm Al Added filter of either 21 mm aluminum or 0.5 mm copper and 2 mm aluminum Adjustment of the kvp from 66 to 74 is permitted to achieve the target HVL AAPM kvp: 70 ± 4 HVL: 6.8 ± 0.25 mm Al Added filter of either 21 mm aluminum or 0.5 mm copper and 0 to 4 mm aluminum*, Adjustment of the kvp and filter permitted to achieve the target HVL *Type 1100 Document the added filter and X-ray tube voltage used for calibration 12 6

Calibration - Recommendation Start as close to 70 kvp as possible Measure non-invasively without added filtration If your meter support Practical Peak Voltage (PPV), use it Use at least 1 meter Source to Detector distance Adjust added filtration to achieve 6.8 mm HVL No less than 0.5 mm Cu or 18 mm Al No more than 0.5 mm Cu + 4 mm Al or 23 mm Al Raise or lower kv as a last resort Record the final filter thickness and generator kvp On repeat calibrations, start with the previous filter thickness 13 Summary Exposure Indicator Name IEC 62494 Exposure Index (EI) AAPM TG116 Indicated Equivalent Air Kerma (K ind ) Exposure Indicator Units Unitless μgy Exposure Indicator Precision Not specified 3 significant EI EI T K KTGT IND Deviation Index formula DI 10 log DI 10*log Deviation Index Units Unitless Unitless Deviation Index Precision Not specified 1 decimal place Beam Conditions 6.8 ± 0.3 mm Al 6.8 ± 0.25 mm Al 14 7

Factors that affect EI Calculation of EI based on anatomical region of interest. (ROI) - Relevant Image Region Method to determine ROI and area of ROI affect EI value Either define a specific procedure or method 15 ROI and Exposure Variation 16 8

30 Exposures No Changes Bone and Soft Tissue Mostly Bone Bone Only Mean 398.1 277.9 231.2 Std 2.164 0.712 0.774 17 Chest Exposures All Image Anatomy Mean 466.00 462.17 Std 2.280 2.483 18 9

ROI Effects on DI Bone and Soft Tissue Mostly Bone Bone Only 4 mas -1.0-1.0-1.0 6 mas +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 19 DICOM Changes CP1024 written to support new Exposure Indices Became Final Text June 21, 2010 Use is not mandatory 20 10

DICOM Changes Legacy Exposure Indices Attribute Name Tag Type Attribute Description Relative X-Ray Exposure (0018,1405) 3 Relative x-ray exposure on the plate. Meaning of values is implementation specific. May be used to adjust the dynamic range of the plate digitizer (scanner). Note: This value is manufacturerspecific. DICOM specifies standard Attributes in Table 10.x-1 Exposure Index Macro which are recommended. Sensitivity (0018,6000) 3 Read out sensitivity. Note: This value is manufacturerspecific. DICOM specifies standard Attributes in Table 10.x-1 Exposure Index Macro which are recommended. 21 DICOM Changes New Exposure Indices Attribute Name Tag Type Attribute Description Exposure Index (0018,1411) 3 Measure of the detector response to radiation in the relevant image region of an image acquired with a digital x-ray imaging system as defined in IEC 62494-1. Notes: 1. A string rather than binary Value Representation is used for this Attribute, in order to allow the sender to control the precision of the value as suggested in the report of AAPM Task Group 116. 2. This index value is scaled as defined by IEC 62494-1. Target Exposure Index (0018,1412) 3 The target value used to calculate the Deviation Index (0018,1413) as defined in IEC 62494-1. Deviation Index (0018,1413) 3 A scaled representation of the difference of the Exposure Index compared to the Target Exposure Index as defined in IEC 62494-1 and the report of AAPM TG 116. 22 11

Recommendations Insist that all new CR and DR equipment support IEC 62494-1 Both EI and DI Push your PACS vendor to support and display DI on all workstations (CP1024) Attempt to upgrade older CR and DR systems to add support for IEC 62494-1 Develop a set of Target Exposure Values Setup a training program on the use of EI, DI and action limits 23 Learning Objectives 1. Understand AAPM recommendations, 2. Understand the IEC standard, 3. Understand factors that affect Exposure and Deviation Index values. 4. Understand DICOM support for Exposure and Deviation Index values. 24 12

Final Comment It is essential that t all aspects of good clinical technique be adhered to and an appropriate DI value should not be interpreted as proof of good work. TG116 Report Section X 25 Thank You UCD School of Medicine & Medical Science Scoil an Leighis agus Eolaíocht An Leighis UCD 13