Introduction to LRFD, Loads and Loads Distribution



Similar documents
3.2 DEFINITIONS, cont. Revise or add the following definitions::

Chapter 12 LOADS AND LOAD FACTORS NDOT STRUCTURES MANUAL

LRFD Bridge Design. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Loading and General Information

Steel Bridge Design Handbook

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1

SLAB DESIGN EXAMPLE. Deck Design (AASHTO LRFD 9.7.1) TYPICAL SECTION. County: Any Hwy: Any Design: BRG Date: 7/2010

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

Reinforced Concrete Slab Design Using the Empirical Method

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

Long-term serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations

Table of Contents. July

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC October 27, 2015 Session 26

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

Chapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs. Bridge Engineering 1

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

Evaluation of Bridge Performance and Rating through Nondestructive

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

APPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

Snake River Bridge Load Test Addressing Bridge Management Issues WBES 2015 Reno, NV

16. Beam-and-Slab Design

Overhang Bracket Loading. Deck Issues: Design Perspective

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS APRIL 2000 SECTION 9 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

IN-SERVICE PERFORMANCE AND BEHAVIOR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE HYBRID COMPOSITE BRIDGE SYSTEM A CASE STUDY

CHAPTER 13 CONCRETE COLUMNS

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating Training. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrDR 6.6)

Session 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges

LOAD TESTING FOR BRIDGE RATING: DEAN S MILL OVER HANNACROIS CREEK

Canadian Standards Association

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES PART V SEISMIC DESIGN

DESIGN: (SUBSTRUCTURES, SPECIAL STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS) PART 12 BD 31/01 THE DESIGN OF BURIED CONCRETE BOX AND PORTAL FRAME STRUCTURES SUMMARY

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED BARRIER CABLE SYSTEMS

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Engineering for Stability in Bridge Construction: A New Manual and Training Course by FHWA/NHI

Reinforced Concrete Design

Spon Press PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DESIGN EUROCODES. University of Glasgow. Department of Civil Engineering. Prabhakara Bhatt LONDON AND NEW YORK

SEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP

Lyang, J., Lee, D., Kung, J. "Reinforced Concrete Bridges." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. Wai-Fah Chen and Lian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China

9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I)

Steel joists and joist girders are

The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow.

Bridging Your Innovations to Realities

This manual was produced using ComponentOne Doc-To-Help.

Structural Performance of Highway Bridges under Given Foundation Settlements

Index Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12)

Hunter College school of Social Work Thesis Proposal

REPAIR AND STRENGTHENING OF HISTORICAL CONCRETE BRIDGE OVER VENTA RIVER IN LATVIA

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam

CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS - SEISMIC ISOLATION BEARINGS

DISTRIBUTION OF LOADSON PILE GROUPS

Bridge Type Selection

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]

How To Write An Analysis System For Bridge Test

Expected Performance Rating System

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

Analysis of the Response Under Live Loads of Two New Cable Stayed Bridges Built in Mexico

ASSESSMENT AND PROPOSED STRUCTURAL REPAIR STRATEGIES FOR BRIDGE PIERS IN TAIWAN DAMAGED BY THE JI-JI EARTHQUAKE ABSTRACT

Steel and composite bridges in Germany State of the Art

SECTION 7 Engineered Buildings Field Investigation

ARCH 331 Structural Glossary S2014abn. Structural Glossary

Chapter 8. Flexural Analysis of T-Beams

Guidelines for the Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

Full Depth Precast Concrete Highway Bridge Decks

Manual for Condition Evaluation and Load Rating of Highway Bridges Using Load and Resistance Factor Philosophy

2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement.

1.2 Advantages and Types of Prestressing

2.0 External and Internal Forces act on structures

Simplified Design to BS 5400

S03: Tier 1 Assessment of Shear in Concrete Short Span Bridges to AS 5100 and AS 3600

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM

CONCEPTUAL REHABILITATION ALTERNATIVE

REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE MAULE EARTHQUAKE

Crane Runway Girder. Dr. Ibrahim Fahdah Damascus University.

Structural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments

Introduction to Railroad Track Structural Design

Design Parameters for Steel Special Moment Frame Connections

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE. Introduction REINFORCED CONCRETE CHAPTER SPRING Reinforced Concrete Design. Fifth Edition. By Dr. Ibrahim.

Preliminary steel concrete composite bridge design charts for Eurocodes

Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures

Transcription:

Introduction to LRFD, Loads and Loads Distribution Thomas K. Saad, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Chicago, IL Evolution of Design Methodologies SLD Methodology: (f t ) D + (f t ) L 0.55F y, or 1.82(f t ) D + 1.82(f t ) L F y LFD Methodology: 1.3[1.0(f t ) D + 5/3(f t ) L ] φf y, or 1.3(f t ) D + 2.17(f t ) L φf y LRFD Methodology: 1.25(f t ) D + 1.75(f t ) L φf y (φ by judgment) (φ by calibration) (new live-load model) Introduction to LRFD 1-1

Evolution of Design Methodologies (cont d) SLD does not recognize that some types of loads are more variable than others. LFD provides recognition that types of loads are different. LRFD provides a probability-based mechanism to select load & resistance factors. Evolution of Design Methodologies (cont d) As a result, LRFD achieves considerable improvement in the clustering of reliability indices versus the AASHTO Standard Specifications. RELIABILITY IDEX 5 4 3.5 3 2 1 RELIABILITY IDEX 0 0 30 60 90 120 200 SPA LEGTH (Feet) LFD LRFD Introduction to LRFD 1-2

Basic LRFD Design Equation Ση i γ i Q i φr n = R r Eq. (1.3.2.1-1) where: η i = η D η R η I η i 0.95 for maximum γ s η i = 1 < 1.00 for minimum γ s η η η D R γ i = Load factor φ = Resistance factor Q i = ominal force effect R n = ominal resistance R r = Factored resistance = φr n I LRFD Limit States The LRFD Specifications require examination of several load combinations corresponding to the following limit states: SERVICE LIMIT STATE relating to stress, deformation, and cracking FATIGUE & FRACTURE LIMIT STATE relating to stress range and crack growth under repetitive loads, and material toughness STREGTH LIMIT STATE relating to strength and stability - (COSTRUCTIBILITY) EXTREME EVET LIMIT STATE relating to events such as earthquakes, ice load, and vehicle and vessel collision Introduction to LRFD 1-3

3.3.2 Load and Load Designation STREGTH I : STREGTH II : STREGTH III : STREGTH IV : STREGTH V : SERVICE I : SERVICE II : SERVICE III : SERVICE IV : FATIGUE : without wind. owner design / permit vehicles without wind. wind exceeding 55 mph. very high dead-to-live load ratios. vehicular use with 55 mph wind. normal operational use of the bridge with a 55 mph wind and nominal loads. Also control cracking of reinforced concrete structures. control yielding of steel structures and slip of connections control cracking of prestressed concrete superstructures. control cracking of prestressed concrete substructures. repetitive vehicular live load and dynamic responses under a single truck. 3.3.2 Load and Load Designation DD = downdrag DC = dead load of structural components and nonstructural attachments DW = dead load of wearing surfaces and utilities EH = horizontal earth pressure EL = accumulated locked-in force effects resulting from the construction process, including the secondary forces from post-tensioning ES = earth surcharge load EV = earth fill vertical pressure BR = braking force CE = centrifugal force CR = creep CT = vehicular collision force CV = vessel collision force EQ = earthquake FR = friction IC = ice load IM = dynamic load allowance LL = live load LS = live load surcharge PL = pedestrian live load SE = settlement SH = shrinkage TG = temperature gradient TU = uniform temperature WA = water load and stream pressure WL = wind on live load WS = wind load on structure Introduction to LRFD 1-4

Permanent Loads (Article 3.5) Dead Load (Article 3.5.1): DC - Dead load, except wearing surfaces & utilities DC 1 - placed prior to deck hardening and acting on the noncomposite section DC 2 - placed after deck hardening and acting on the long-term composite section DW - Wearing surfaces & utilities acting on the longterm composite section Load Factors for Permanent Loads, γ p Load Factor Type of Load Maximum Minimum DC: Component and Attachments 1.25 0.90 DD: Downdrag 1.80 0.45 DW: Wearing Surfaces and Utilities EH: Horizontal Earth Pressure Active At-Rest EV: Vertical Earth Pressure Overall Stability Retaining Structure Rigid Buried Structure Rigid Frames 1.50 0.65 1.50 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.30 1.35 1.95 0.90 0.90 /A 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 Introduction to LRFD 1-5

Basic LRFD Design Live Load HL-93 -- (Article 3.6.1.2.1) Design Truck: or Design Tandem: Pair of 25.0 KIP axles spaced 4.0 FT apart superimposed on Design Lane Load 0.64 KLF uniformly distributed load or 25.0 KIP 25.0 KIP + 0.64 Kip/ft LRFD egative Moment Loading (Article 3.6.1.3.1) For negative moment (between points of permanent-load contraflexure) & interior-pier reactions, check an additional load case: 0.9 x > 50-0 Introduction to LRFD 1-6

LRFD Fatigue Load (Article 3.6.1.4.1) Design Truck only => w/ fixed 30-ft rearaxle spacing Placed in a single lane 1 Load Combinations and Load Factors Load Combination Limit State DC DD DW EH EV ES LL IM CE BR PL LS WA WS WL FR TU CR SH TG SE Use One of These at a Time EQ IC CT CV STREGTH-I γ p 1.75 1.00 - - 1.00 0.50/1.20 γ TG γ SE - - - - STREGTH-II γ p 1.35 1.00 - - 1.00 0.50/1.20 γ TG γ SE - - - - STREGTH-III γ p - 1.00 1.40-1.00 0.50/1.20 γ TG γ SE - - - - STREGTH-IV EH, EV, ES, DW DC OLY γ p 1.5-1.00 - - 1.00 0.50/1.20 - - - - - - STREGTH-V γ p 1.35 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.50/1.20 γ TG γ SE - - - - EXTREME-I γ p γ EQ 1.00 - - 1.00 - - - 1.00 - - - EXTREME-II γ p 0.50 1.00 - - 1.00 - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 SERVICE-I 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00/1.20 γ TG γ SE - - - - SERVICE-II 1.00 1.30 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00/1.20 - - - - - - SERVICE-III 1.00 0.80 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00/1.20 γ TG γ SE - - - - FATIGUE-LL, IM & CE OLY - 0.75 - - - - - - - - - - - Introduction to LRFD 1-7

Resistance Factors (Article 6.5.4.2) Resistance factors, φ, for the strength limit state shall be taken as follows: For flexure φ f = 1.00 For shear φ v = 1.00 For axial compression, steel only φ c = 0.90 For axial compression, composite φ c = 0.90 For tension, fracture in net section φ u = 0.80 For tension, yielding in gross section φ y = 0.95 For bolts bearing on material φ bb = 0.80 For shear connectors φ sc = 0.85 For A 325 and A 490 bolts in shear φ s = 0.80 For block shear φ bs = 0.80 For web crippling φ w = 0.80 For weld metal in fillet welds: tension or compression parallel to axis of the weld same as base metal shear in throat of weld metal φ e2 = 0.80 Resistance Factors (Article 5.5.4.2) Resistance factor φ shall be taken as: For flexure and tension of reinforced concrete. 0.90 For flexure and tension of prestressed concrete. 1.00 For shear and torsion: normal weight concrete 0.90 lightweight concrete. 0.70 For axial compression with spirals or ties, except as specified in Article 5.10.11.4.1b for Seismic Zones 3 and 4 at the extreme event limit state.. 0.75 For bearing on concrete 0.70 For compression in strut-and-tie models 0.70 For compression in anchorage zones: normal weight concrete 0.80 lightweight concrete. 0.65 For tension in steel in anchorage zones.. 1.00 For resistance during pile driving.. 1.00 Introduction to LRFD 1-8

Structural Analysis & Evaluation (Article 4) Static Analysis (Article 4.6) Approximate Methods of Analysis (Article 4.6.2) Beam-Slab Bridges (Article 4.6.2.2) Live-Load Lateral Distribution Factors TABLE 4.6.2.2.1-1 COMMO DECK SUPERSTRUCTURES COVERED I ARTICLES 4.6.2.2.2 AD 4.6.2.2.3. SUPPORTIG COMPOETS TYPE OF DECK TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIO Steel Beam Cast-in-place concrete slab, precast concrete slab, steel grid, glued/spiked panels, stressed wood Closed Steel or Precast Concrete Boxes Cast-in-place concrete slab Open Steel or Precast Concrete Boxes Cast-in-place concrete slab, precast concrete deck slab Cast-in-Place Concrete Multicell Box Monolithic concrete Cast-in-Place Concrete Tee Beam Monolithic concrete Precast Solid, Voided or Cellular Concrete Boxes with Shear Keys Cast-in-place concrete overlay Precast Solid, Voided, or Cellular Concrete Box with Shear Keys and with or without Transverse Posttensioning Integral concrete Introduction to LRFD 1-9

For Moments Interior Beams Table 4.6.2.2.2b-1 Distribution of Live Loads Per Lane for Moment in Interior Beams. Type of Beams Concrete Deck, Filled Grid, Partially Filled Grid, or Unfilled Grid Deck Composite with Reinforced Concrete Slab on Steel or Concrete Beams; Concrete T- Beams, T- and Double T- Sections Applicable Cross-Section from Table 4.6.2.2.1-1 Distribution Factors a, e, k and also One Design Lane Loaded: i, j 0.4 0.3 0.1 S S K g if sufficiently 0.06 + 3 connected to 14 L 12.0Lts act as a unit Two or More Design Lanes Loaded: 0.6 0.2 0.1 S S K g 0.075 + 3 9.5 L 12.0 Lts use lesser of the values obtained from the equation above with b = 3 or the lever rule Range of Applicability 3.5 S 16.0 20 L 240 4.5 ts 12.0 4 b 10,000 K g 7,000,000 b = 3 otes: 1) Units are in LAES and not WHEELS! 2) o multiple presence factor Introduction to LRFD 1-10

For Shear Interior Beams Table 4.6.2.2.3a-1 Distribution of Live Load per Lane for Shear in Interior Beams. Type of Superstructure Concrete Deck, Filled Grid, Partially Filled Grid, or Unfilled Grid Deck Composite with Reinforced Concrete Slab on Steel or Concrete Beams; Concrete T-Beams, T-and Double T-Sections Applicable Cross-Section from Table 4.6.2.2.1-1 a, e, k and also i, j if sufficiently connected to act as a unit One Design Lane Loaded S 0.36 + 25.0 Two or More Design Lanes Range of Loaded Applicability 2.0 S S 3.5 S 16.0 0.2 + 12 35 20 L 240 4.5 t 12.0 b s 4 Lever Rule Lever Rule b = 3 otes: 1) Units are in LAES and not WHEELS! 2) o multiple presence factor Live-Load Distribution Factors Design Example Introduction to LRFD 1-11

Example POSITIVE FLEXURE (ED SPA) Calculate Kg: n = 8.A. is 39.63 in. from the top of the steel. e g e K g g 9.0 = + 3.5 + 39.63 1.0 = 46.63in. 2 = n I 2 2 6 4 ( + Ae ) = 8( 62,658+ 75.25( 46.63) ) = 1.81x 10 in. g Introduction to LRFD 1-12

M+, Interior Girder t S S Article 4.6.2.2.2b: One lane loaded: S 0.06 + 14 0.4 Two or more lanes loaded: S 0.075 + 9.5 L S L 0.6 0.3 S L Kg 12.0Lt 0.2 3 S Kg 12.0Lt 3 S 0.1 0.1 Live-Load Distribution Factors M+, Interior Girder - (cont d) One lane loaded: 12.0 0.06 + 14 0.4 12.0 140.0 0.3 1.81x 10 12.0 6 ( 140.0)( 9.0) 3 0.1 = 0.528 lanes Two or more lanes loaded: 12.0 0.075 + 9.5 0.6 12.0 140.0 0.2 1.81x 10 12.0 6 ( 140.0)( 9.0) 3 0.1 = 0.807 lanes (governs) Introduction to LRFD 1-13

V, Interior Girder Table 4.6.2.2.3a-1 One lane loaded: S 0.36 + 25.0 12.0 0.36 + = 0.840 lanes 25.0 Two or more lanes loaded: 0.2 + S 12 S 35 12.0 12.0 0.2 + 12 35 2 2 = 1.082 lanes (governs) Live-Load Distribution Factors M-, Interior Girder L = 0.5(140+175) = 157.5 ft. One lane loaded: Two or more lanes loaded:. 12.0 0.06 + 14 12.0 0.075 + 9.5 0.6 0.4 12.0 157.5 12.0 157.5 0.2 0.3 2.65 x 10 12.0(157.5) 2.65 x 10 12.0(157.5) 6 ( 9.0) 3 6 ( 9.0) 0.1 3 0.1 = 0.524 lanes = 0.809 lanes (governs) Introduction to LRFD 1-14

Moments Exterior Beams Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1 Distribution of Live Loads Per Lane for Moment in Exterior Longitudinal Beams. Type of Superstructure Concrete Deck, Filled Grid, Partially Filled Grid, or Unfilled Grid Deck Composite with Reinforced Concrete Slab on Steel or Concrete Beams; Concrete T-Beams, T- and Double T- Sections Applicable Cross- Section from Table 4.6.2.2.1-1 a, e, k and also i, j if sufficiently connected to act as a unit One Design Lane Loaded Lever Rule Two or More Design Lanes Loaded g = e ginterior d e e = 0.77 + 9.1 use lesser of the values obtained from the equation above with b = 3 or the lever rule Range of Applicability -1.0 < de < 5.5 b = 3 otes: In beam-slab bridges with diaphragms or cross-frames, the distribution factor for the exterior beam shall not be taken to be less than that which would be obtained by assuming that the cross-section deflects and rotates as a rigid cross-section. R = L b X + L ext b 2 x e Live-Load Distribution Factors Shear Exterior Beams Table 4.6.2.2.3b-1 Distribution of Live Load per Lane for Shear in Exterior Beams. Type of Superstructure Concrete Deck, Filled Grid, Partially Filled Grid, or Unfilled Grid Deck Composite with Reinforced Concrete Slab on Steel or Concrete Beams; Concrete T- Applicable Cross- Section from Table 4.6.2.2.1-1 a, e, k and also i, j if sufficiently connected to act as a unit One Design Lane Loaded Lever Rule Two or More Design Range of Lanes Loaded Applicability g = e g interior -1.0 < d e < 5.5 de e = 0.6 + 10 Lever Rule b = 3 otes: In beam-slab bridges with diaphragms or cross-frames, the distribution factor for the exterior beam shall not be taken to be less than that which would be obtained by assuming that the cross-section deflects and rotates as a rigid cross-section. L X R = + b L ext b 2 x e Introduction to LRFD 1-15

M, Exterior Girder For bending moment (Article 4.6.2.2.2d): One lane loaded: Use the lever rule Consider multiple presence factors when: - # of lanes of traffic on the deck must be considered in the analysis (Art. 3.6.1.1.2) umber of Loaded Lanes Multiple Presence Factors "m" 1 1.20 2 1.00 3 0.85 > 3 0.65 = R x 9 / 12 Introduction to LRFD 1-16

M, Exterior Girder - (cont d) One lane loaded: Using the lever rule 9.0 12.0 = 0.750 Multiple presence factor m = 1.2 (Table 3.6.1.1.2-1) 1.2 ( 0.750) = 0.900 lanes umber of Loaded Lanes Multiple Presence Factors "m" 1 1.20 2 1.00 3 0.85 > 3 0.65 Live-Load Distribution Factors M, Exterior Girder - (cont d) Two or more lanes loaded: Modify interior-girder factor by e de e = 0.77 + (Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1) 9.1 2.0 e = 0.77 + = 0.990 9.1 0.990 ( 0.807 ) = 0.799 lanes ote: 1) The multiple presence factor is not applied. Introduction to LRFD 1-17

M, Exterior Girder - (cont d) Special Analysis: for beam-slab bridges with diaphragms or cross frames Assuming the entire cross-section rotates as a rigid body about the longitudinal centerline of the bridge, distribution factors for one, two and three lanes loaded are computed using the following formula: R = L b X + L ext b 2 x e Eq. (C4.6.2.2.2d-1) Live-Load Distribution Factors M, Exterior Girder - (cont d) Special Analysis: R = L b X + L ext b 2 x e Eq. (C4.6.2.2.2d-1) R L e x X ext b = reaction on exterior beam in terms of lanes = number of loaded lanes under consideration = eccentricity of a lane from the center of gravity of the pattern of girders (ft) = horizontal distance from the center of gravity of the pattern of girders to each girder (ft) = horizontal distance from the center of gravity of the pattern of girders to the exterior girder (ft) = number of beams or girders Introduction to LRFD 1-18

M, Exterior Girder - (cont d) One lane loaded: 15-0 R = 1 4 ( 18.0)( 15.0) + 2 18.0 2 2 ( + 6.0 ) = 0.625 m R = 1.2(0.625) = 0.750 lanes 1 R = L b X + ext b x L 2 e 18-0 umber of Loaded Lanes Multiple Presence Factors "m" 1 1.20 2 1.00 3 0.85 > 3 0.65 Live-Load Distribution Factors M, Exterior Girder - (cont d) Two lanes loaded: 15-0 L X ext R = + b b x 2 R = + 4 2 18.0 ( 18.0)( 15.0 + 3.0) 2 2 ( + 6.0 ) = 0.950 m R = 1.0(0.950) = 0.950 lanes (governs) 2 L 2 e umber of Loaded Lanes Multiple Presence Factors "m" 1 1.20 2 1.00 3 0.85 > 3 0.65 Introduction to LRFD 1-19

M, Exterior Girder - (cont d) Three lanes loaded: 15-0 - R = R = 3 4 m R = 0.85 3 L b X + ext b x (18.0 ) + 2 18.0 L 2 e ( 15.0 + 3.0-9.0) 2 2 ( + 6.0 ) ( 0.975) = 0.829 lanes = 0.975 umber of Loaded Lanes Multiple Presence Factors "m" 1 1.20 2 1.00 3 0.85 > 3 0.65 Live-Load Distribution Factors V, Exterior Girder - (cont d) For shear (Article 4.6.2.2.3b): One lane loaded: Use the lever rule 0.970 lanes Two or more lanes loaded: Modify interior-girder factor by e de e = 0.6 + 10 2.0 e = 0.6 + = 0.80 10 0.80 ( 1.082) = 0.866 lanes (Table 4.6.2.2.3b-1) Introduction to LRFD 1-20

V, Exterior Girder - (cont d) Special Analysis: The factors used for bending moment are also used for shear: One lane loaded: 0.750 lanes Two lanes loaded: Three lanes loaded: 0.950 lanes (governs) 0.829 lanes All factors used for both pos. & neg. flexure. SUMMARY Live-Load Distribution Factors Strength Limit State AASHTO LRFD - Positive Flexure: Interior Girder Exterior Girder Bending Moment 0.807 lanes 0.950 lanes Shear 1.082 lanes 0.950 lanes AASHTO LRFD - egative Flexure: Interior Girder Exterior Girder Bending Moment 0.809 lanes 0.950 lanes Shear 1.082 lanes 0.950 lanes Introduction to LRFD 1-21

Fatigue Limit State The fatigue load is placed in a single lane. Therefore, the distribution factors for onelane loaded are used. (see Article 3.6.1.4.3b) Multiple presence factors are not to be applied for fatigue. Thus, the distribution factors for one-lane loaded must be modified by dividing out the multiple presence factor of 1.2 specified for one-lane loaded. (see Article 3.6.1.1.2) SUMMARY Live-Load Distribution Factors Fatigue Limit State - Design Example AASHTO LRFD - Positive Flexure: Interior Girder Exterior Girder Bending Moment 0.440 lanes 0.750 lanes Shear 0.700 lanes 0.750 lanes AASHTO LRFD - egative Flexure: Interior Girder Exterior Girder Bending Moment 0.437 lanes 0.750 lanes Shear 0.700 lanes 0.750 lanes Introduction to LRFD 1-22

Skew Correction Factors For bending moment (Article 4.6.2.2.2e): The skew correction factor for bending moment reduces the live-load distribution factor. For skew angles less than 30, the correction factor is equal to 1.0. For skew angles greater than 60, the correction factor is computed using an angle of 60. The difference in skew angle between two adjacent lines of supports cannot exceed 10. Dead-load moments are currently not modified for the effects of skew. c 1 K = 0.25 Lt g 3 s 0.25 S L 0.5 Correction factor= 1 c 1 ( tanθ) 1. 5 (Table 4.6.2.2.2e-1) Live-Load Distribution Factors Skew Correction Factors (cont.) For shear (Article 4.6.2.2.3c): The skew correction factor increases the live-load distribution factor for shear in the exterior girder at the obtuse corner of the bridge. The correction factor is valid for skew angles less than or equal to 60. The factor may be conservatively applied to all end shears. Dead-load shears are currently not modified for the effects of skew. 3 Lt Correction factor = 1.0 + 0.20 s tanθ Kg (Table 4.6.2.2.3c-1) 0.3 Introduction to LRFD 1-23

Load for Optional Live-Load Deflection Evaluation (Article 3.6.1.3.2) The larger of: - The design truck, or - 25% of the design truck + 100% of the design lane load. Live-Load Deflection (Article 2.5.2.6.2) Use the SERVICE I load combination & multiple presence factors where appropriate. For straight-girder systems, all lanes should be loaded and all supporting components should be assumed to deflect equally. For composite design, the stiffness used for calculation of the deflection should include the entire width of the roadway, and may include the structurally continuous portions of the railings, sidewalks and barriers. Introduction to LRFD 1-24

Distribution Factor for Live-Load Deflection For the design example: L DF = m3 b 3 = 0.85 = 0.638 lanes 4 umber of Loaded Lanes Multiple Presence Factors "m" 1 1.20 2 1.00 3 0.85 > 3 0.65 Dynamic Load Allowance (Impact - IM) (Article 3.6.2.1) IM = 33% (for truck or tandem only; not for lane). Exceptions are: Deck joints: IM = 75% Fatigue limit state: IM = 15% Introduction to LRFD 1-25

QUESTIOS? Thomas Saad, P.E. FHWA, Suite 301 19900 Governors Drive Olympia Fields, IL 60461 Ph: 708.283.3521 E-mail: thomas.saad@fhwa.dot.gov Introduction to LRFD 1-26