WPPSI-IV Comments: WIAT-III Comments:

Similar documents
Interpretive Report of WISC-IV and WIAT-II Testing - (United Kingdom)

Overview of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition

Interpretive Report of WAIS IV Testing. Test Administered WAIS-IV (9/1/2008) Age at Testing 40 years 8 months Retest? No

WISC-V Interpretive Considerations for Laurie Jones (6/1/2015)

INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTIVITY WITH CELF 4 SOFTWARE! SAMPLE REPORTS. To order, call , or visit our Web site at

Interpretive Report of WMS IV Testing

Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses in L.D. Identification

Cecil R. Reynolds, PhD, and Randy W. Kamphaus, PhD. Additional Information

Technical Report. Overview. Revisions in this Edition. Four-Level Assessment Process

Introducing the WAIS IV. Copyright 2008 Pearson Education, inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

General Ability Index January 2005

Advanced Clinical Solutions. Serial Assessment Case Studies

Efficacy Report WISC V. March 23, 2016

Overview: Part 1 Adam Scheller, Ph.D. Senior Educational Consultant

OCPS Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment Alignment

G e n e ra l A b i l i t y I n d ex January 2005

20 by Renaissance Learning, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.

The child is given oral, "trivia"- style. general information questions. Scoring is pass/fail.

EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS OF THE WISC-IV WPS TEST REPORT

Early Childhood Measurement and Evaluation Tool Review

Using the WASI II with the WISC IV: Substituting WASI II Subtest Scores When Deriving WISC IV Composite Scores

Essentials of WAIS-IV Assessment

Phonics. Phonics is recommended as the first strategy that children should be taught in helping them to read.

Wide Range Achievement Test 4 (WRAT4)

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

The test uses age norms (national) and grade norms (national) to calculate scores and compare students of the same age or grade.

Unit 2 Title: Word Work Grade Level: 1 st Grade Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Overview of Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-2 Gloria Maccow, Ph.D., Assessment Training Consultant

PPVT -4 Publication Summary Form

DRA2 Word Analysis. correlated to. Virginia Learning Standards Grade 1

Association of Specialists in Assessment of Intellectual Functioning ASAIF.

Technical Report #2 Testing Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES (SLD)

The Scoop on Understanding Psych Testing: What do all those numbers really mean???

Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Second Edition Interpretive Report

Parents Guide Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)

Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses Standards and Procedures. for. Identification of Students with Suspected Specific Learning Disabilities

Intervention Strategies for Struggling Readers

Standardized Tests, Intelligence & IQ, and Standardized Scores

TEST REVIEW. Purpose and Nature of Test. Practical Applications

A Parents Guide to Understanding. Reading

Which WJ-III Subtests Should I Administer?

Diagnostic Assessments of Reading. Second Edition Form A

RIAS Interpretive Report

Montessori Academy of Owasso

mclass: Reading 3D Reminders

Psychoeducational Assessment How to Read, Understand, and Use Psychoeducational Reports

Demystifying the SLD Category, Assessment and Diagnosis

Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Revised, Normative Update (WRMT-Rnu) The normative update of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Revised (Woodcock,

Kindergarten Common Core State Standards: English Language Arts

Reading Specialist (151)

Parent s Guide to STAR Assessments. Questions and Answers

PRE AND POST TEST TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YEARS OF ANIMATED LITERACY AND KNOWLEDGE OF LETTERS STEPHANIE, BUCK. Submitted to

CELF-4 Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals FOURTH EDITION

Phonics Scope and Sequence Struggling or At Risk Readers. Phonological Awareness and Letter Naming : Early Literacy Kindergarten or first grade 1

Comprehensive Reading Assessment Grades K-1

Grade 1 LA Subject Grade Strand Standard Benchmark. Florida K-12 Reading and Language Arts Standards 27

Indiana Department of Education

Areas of Processing Deficit and Their Link to Areas of Academic Achievement

It s WISC-IV and more!

STAR. Early Literacy Teacher s Guide

WISC IV Technical Report #2 Psychometric Properties. Overview

Conducting Geriatric Evaluations: Using Data from WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACSW4W4 Gloria Maccow, Ph.D., Assessment Training Consultant

Unit 1 Title: Word Work Grade Level: 1 st Grade Timeframe: 6 Weeks

2e. Initial sounds isolate and pronounce in CVC (/c/ in cat) Onsets and rhymes in single

BASI Manual Addendum: Growth Scale Value (GSV) Scales and College Report

A Comparison of Jolly Phonics and Jolly Grammar with the Six Phases of Letters and Sounds

TExES Texas Examinations of Educator Standards. Preparation Manual. 191 Generalist EC 6

Intellectual Disability-DSM5

Wednesday 4 th November Y1/2 Parent Workshop Phonics & Reading

Preschool Early Literacy Indicators (PELI ) Benchmark Goals and Composite Score Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. / August 20, 2015

Strand: Reading Literature Topics Standard I can statements Vocabulary Key Ideas and Details

INTEGRATING THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INTO INTERACTIVE, ONLINE EARLY LITERACY PROGRAMS

Fantastic Phonics Teaching Guide

There are many reasons why reading can be hard. This handout describes

SPECIAL EDUCATION and RELATED SERVICES SPARTA SCHOOL DISTRICT - SPECIAL SERVICES DEPT. JULY 28, 2014

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS. The purpose of statistics is to condense raw data to make it easier to answer specific questions; test hypotheses.

Common Educational Tests used for Assessments for Special Education

WISC IV and Children s Memory Scale

Cognitive Abilities Test 7 (CogAT7)

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

Create stories, songs, plays, and rhymes in play activities. Act out familiar stories, songs, rhymes, plays in play activities

Scoring Assistant SAMPLE REPORT

standardized tests used to assess mental ability & development, in an educational setting.

Progression in each phase for Letters & Sounds:

Right into Reading. Program Overview Intervention Appropriate K 3+ A Phonics-Based Reading and Comprehension Program

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT I PCO 6316C

Interpreting areading Scaled Scores for Instruction

Teaching Young Children How to Read: Phonics vs. Whole Language. Introduction and Background

Assessment Service Bulletin Number 5

SAMPLE EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION

Reading Readiness Online

CHAPTER 12 TESTING DIFFERENCES WITH ORDINAL DATA: MANN WHITNEY U

My Review Use My Review pages to assess your students' understanding of the vocabulary and key concepts in this chapter.

READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

Phonemic Awareness. Section III

Ohio Early Learning and Development Standards Domain: Language and Literacy Development

Transcription:

WPPSI -IV/WIAT -III Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition Wechsler Individual Achievement Test -Third Edition Combination Report Examinee Name Sample Report Date of Report /18/13 Examinee ID Grade Kindergarten Date of Birth 8/9/6 Home Language English Gender Male Handedness Left Race/Ethnicity White Examiner Name Examiner, Sample Test Administered WPPSI-IV, 8/9/1 Age at Testing 6 years months Retest? No WIAT-III, 9/5/1 6 years months No WPPSI-IV Comments: WIAT-III Comments: Copyright 1. All rights reserved. Pearson, the PSI logo, PsychCorp, Wechsler, Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, the Wechsler logo, WIAT and WPPSI are trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries of Pearson Education, Inc. [ 1. / RE1 / QG1 ]

8/9/1, Page Sample Report PRIMARY SUMMARY WPPSI-IV RESULTS Scaled Summary Subtest Name Total Raw Scaled Percentile Rank Age Equivalent Information IN 1 1.1 3:1 1.4 Similarities SI 1 4 <4:.85 (Vocabulary) VC 1 5 5 <4: 1.4 (Comprehension) CO 1 5 5 4:4 1.4 Block Design BD 4 11 63 6:8 1. Object Assembly OA 8 1 5 6: 1.41 Matrix Reasoning MR 13 84 >7:7.99 Picture Concepts PC 14 91 >7:7 1. Picture Memory PM 4 15 95 >7:7.85 Zoo Locations ZL 14 14 91 >7:7 1.1 Bug Search BS 5 15 95 >7:7 1.31 Cancellation CA 48 1 75 7:5 1.41 (Animal Coding) AC 5 15 95 >7:7 1.41 Subtests used to derive the FSIQ are bolded. Subtests not typically core for any composite score are in parentheses. SEM Subtest Scaled Profile 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 1 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 IN Verbal Comprehension Visual Spatial Fluid Reasoning Working Memory Processing Speed SI VC CO BD OA MR PC PM ZL BS CA AC

8/9/1, Page 3 Sample Report PRIMARY SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Composite Summary Composite Sum of Scaled s Composite Percentile Rank Confidence intervals are calculated using the Standard Error of Estimation. 95% Confidence Interval Qualitative Description Verbal Comprehension VCI 5 63 1 58-7 Extremely Low 3.67 Visual Spatial VSI 1 13 58 94-111 Average 5.41 Fluid Reasoning FRI 7 11 9 11-17 Superior 4.5 Working Memory WMI 9 16 96 116-13 Superior 3.97 Processing Speed PSI 7 11 9 19-18 Superior 5.61 Full Scale IQ FSIQ 59 99 47 93-15 Average 3. SEM Composite Profile 16 15 14 13 1 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ Note. Vertical bars represent the Confidence Intervals.

8/9/1, Page 4 Sample Report PRIMARY ANALYSIS Index Level Strengths and Weaknesses Index Comparison score mean derived from the five index scores. Statistical significance (critical values) at the.5 level. Base rate for ability level. Comparison Critical Value Strength or Weakness Base Rate VCI 63 16.8-43.8 9.8 W <1% VSI 13 16.8-3.8 1.5 >5% FRI 11 16.8 14. 1.46 S 5%-1% WMI 16 16.8 19. 9.57 S 1%-% PSI 11 16.8 14. 1.4 S 5%-1% Index Level Pairwise Comparisons Index Comparison 1 Critical Value Statistical significance (critical values) at the.5 level. Base rate for ability level. Significant Base Rate VCI - VSI 63 13-4 1.81 Y.7% VCI - FRI 63 11-58 11.38 Y.5% VCI - WMI 63 16-63 1.6 Y.6% VCI - PSI 63 11-58 13.14 Y.5% VSI - FRI 13 11-18 13.79 Y 1.% VSI - WMI 13 16-3 13.15 Y 7.7% VSI - PSI 13 11-18 15.8 Y 13.9% FRI - WMI 11 16-5 11.76 N 38.7% FRI - PSI 11 11 14.1 N WMI - PSI 16 11 5 13.47 N 3.8%

8/9/1, Page 5 Sample Report PRIMARY ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Subtest Level Strengths and Weaknesses Subtest Comparison score mean derived from the ten core subtest scores. Statistical significance (critical values) at the.5 level. Comparison Critical Value Strength or Weakness Base Rate IN 1 1.9-9.9.8 W <1% SI 4 1.9-6.9.36 W <1% BD 11 1.9.1 3.17 >5% OA 1 1.9 -.9 3.68 >5% MR 13 1.9.1.68 1%-5% PC 14 1.9 3.1 3.17 5%-1% PM 15 1.9 4.1.36 S %-5% ZL 14 1.9 3.1.99 S 1%-5% BS 15 1.9 4.1 3.44 S %-5% CA 1 1.9 1.1 3.68 >5% Subtest Level Pairwise Comparisons Subtest Comparison 1 Critical Value Statistical significance (critical values) at the.5 level. Significant Base Rate IN - SI 1 4-3.49 Y 1.7% BD - OA 11 1 1 3.6 N 44.1% MR - PC 13 14-1.73 N 45.7% PM - ZL 15 14 1.87 N 43.4% BS - CA 15 1 3 3.79 N.3%

8/9/1, Page 6 Sample Report ANCILLARY SUMMARY Scaled Summary Subtest Name Total Raw Scaled Percentile Rank Age Equivalent Receptive Vocabulary RV 15 5 5 3:1 1.16 Picture Naming PN 11 5 5 3:6 1.1 Cancellation Random CAR 4 13 84 >7:7 1.41 Cancellation Structured CAS 4 11 63 7: 1.67 SEM Index Summary Composite Sum of Scaled s Standard Percentile Rank 95% Confidence Interval Qualitative Description Vocabulary Acquisition VAI 1 73 4 68-8 Borderline 4.5 Nonverbal NVI 68 15 95 118-13 Superior 3.67 General Ability GAI 9 8 1 77-89 Low Average 3.35 Cognitive Proficiency CPI 56 18 97 118-133 Superior 4.4 SEM Ancillary Index Profile 16 15 14 13 1 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 VAI NVI GAI CPI Note. Vertical bars represent the Confidence Intervals.

8/9/1, Page 7 Sample Report ANCILLARY ANALYSIS Index Level Pairwise Comparisons Index Comparison 1 Critical Value Statistical significance (critical values) at the.5 level. Base rate for ability level. Significant Base Rate GAI - FSIQ 8 99-17 4.3 Y.% GAI - CPI 8 18-46 1.59 Y.% Subtest and Process Level Pairwise Comparisons Subtest Comparison 1 Critical Value Statistical significance (critical values) at the.5 level. Significant RV - PN 5 5.75 N Base Rate CAR - CAS 13 11 4.59 N.5%

8/9/1, Page 8 Sample Report WIAT-III RESULTS Subtest Summary Subtest Raw Standard 95% Confidence Interval Percentile Rank Normal Curve Equiv. Stanine - Indicates a subtest with multiple raw scores (shown in the Subtest Component Summary). 1 Indicates a raw score that is converted to a weighted raw score (not shown). Indicates that a raw score is based on a below grade level item set. Grade Equiv. Age Equiv. Listening Comprehension - 81 7-9 1 3 pk.6 4:4 417 Early Reading Skills 18 81 7-9 1 3 pk.9 5: 4 Math Problem Solving 83 74-9 13 6 3 k. 5:4 31 Alphabet Writing Fluency 5 95 79-111 37 43 4 k.5 5:4 466 Numerical Operations 11 97 89-15 4 46 5 k.9 6: 311 Oral Expression - 59 48-7.3 <1 1 <pk. <4: 37 Spelling 3 79 7-86 8 1 <k. <5: 7 Growth

8/9/1, Page 9 Sample Report Subtest Profile 16 155 15 145 14 135 13 15 1 115 11 15 1 95 9 85 8 75 7 65 6 55 5 45 4 Oral Lang Reading Written Expression Mathematics LC OE ERS WR PD RC ORF AWF SC EC SP MPS NO MFA MFS MFM Note. The vertical bars represent the confidence interval at 95%. Subtest Component Summary Subtest Component Listening Comprehension Raw Standard Percentile Rank Normal Curve Equivalent Stanine Qualitative Description Receptive Vocabulary 4 8 1 5 3 Below Average Oral Discourse Comprehension 6 85 16 9 3 Average Oral Expression Expressive Vocabulary 1 67 1 4 1 Low Oral Word Fluency 7 65 1 1 1 Low Sentence Repetition 66 1 1 Low

8/9/1, Page 1 Sample Report Composite Summary Composite Sum of Subtest Standard s Standard 95% Confidence Interval Percentile Rank Normal Curve Equiv. Stanine Qualitative Description Oral Language 14 67 59-75 1 4 1 Low Written Expression 174 85 76-94 16 9 3 Average Mathematics 18 89 8-96 3 35 4 Average Total Achievement 575 79 74-84 8 1 Below Average Composite Profile 16 155 15 145 14 135 13 15 1 115 11 15 1 95 9 85 8 75 7 65 6 55 5 45 4 Oral Language Total Reading Basic Reading Reading Comp Written Expression Math Math Fluency Note. The vertical bars represent the confidence interval at 95%. s Between Composite Standard s Comparison Critical Value (Significance Level.1) Significant Y/N Note. A negative difference indicates that the second composite has a higher score than the first composite listed in the comparison. Base Rate Oral Language vs. Written Expression -18 14.7 Y >15% Oral Language vs. Mathematics - 13.18 Y <=1% Written Expression vs. Mathematics -4 11.77 N >15%

8/9/1, Page 11 Sample Report ABILITY-ACHIEVEMENT DISCREPANCY ANALYSIS Ability Type: WPPSI-IV FSIQ Ability : 99 Predicted Method WIAT-III Subtest Predicted WIAT-III Actual WIAT-III Critical Value.1 Significant Y/N Note. Base rates and standard deviation discrepancies are not reported when the achievement score equals or exceeds the ability score. *Indicates that the achievement score exceeds the ability score. Base Rate Standard Deviation Discrepancy > 1. SD Listening Comprehension 99 81 18 16.8 Y <=1% Y Early Reading Skills 99 81 18 13.17 Y <=1% Y Math Problem Solving 99 83 16 1.81 Y <=1% Y Alphabet Writing Fluency 1 95 5 1.7 N >5% N Numerical Operations 99 97 11.89 N >5% N Oral Expression 99 59 4 14.91 Y <=1% Y Spelling 1 79 1 1.7 Y <=1% Y WIAT-III Composite Oral Language 99 67 3 1.78 Y <=1% Y Written Expression 1 85 15 13.41 Y <=15% Y Mathematics 99 89 1 1.33 N <=% N Total Achievement 99 79 8.87 Y <=3% Y

8/9/1, Page 1 Sample Report Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis Area of Achievement Weakness WIAT-III Oral Expression: 59 Area of Processing Weakness WPPSI-IV VCI: 63 Area of Processing Strength WPPSI-IV FRI: 11 A B Comparison Processing Strength/ Achievement Weakness Processing Strength/ Processing Weakness Relative Strength Relative Weakness Critical Value.1 Significant Y/N Supports SLD hypothesis? Yes/No 11 59 6 18.15 Y Yes 11 63 58 14.98 Y Yes The PSW model is intended to help practitioners generate hypotheses regarding clinical diagnoses. The analysis should always be used within a comprehensive evaluation that incorporates multiple sources of information. Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses Model Processing Strength WPPSI-IV Fluid Reasoning Index SS = 11 A. Discrepant? B. Discrepant? Yes Yes Achievement Weakness WIAT-III Oral Expression SS = 59 Processing Weakness WPPSI-IV Verbal Comprehension Index SS = 63

8/9/1, Page 13 Sample Report WIAT-III SKILLS ANALYSIS REPORT Early Reading Skills Total Errors Max. Errors % Correct Feature Skill by Skill by Skill By Skill By Feature Naming Letter-Sound Correspondance Phonological Awareness Word Reading Comprehension Naming Letters: Vowels Naming Letters: Consonants Matching Single Letters and Sounds Matching Letters and Sounds: Consonant Digraphs Matching Letters and Sounds: Consonant Blends Recognizing Rhyming Words Producing Rhyming Words Recognizing Initial Sounds in Words Recognizing Initial Two Sounds in Words Recognizing Ending Sounds in Words Blending Sounds 1 4 7 1 3 % 8% Matching Words with Pictures 1 5 8% 8%

8/9/1, Page 14 Sample Report WIAT-III INTERVENTION GOAL STATEMENTS REPORT Early Reading Skills Matching Letters and Sounds: Consonant Digraphs Items with Errors: 7 Annual Goals - When shown consonant digraphs one at a time, the student will say the sound(s) that corresponds to each consonant digraph with no more than errors. Consonant digraphs will include the following (circle/enter): ch, sh, th, wh, ng, dg, gh,. - When shown a list of (circle/enter: two, three, ) consonant digraphs, the student will listen to a sound and then point to the consonant digraph that corresponds to each sound with no more than errors. Consonant digraphs will include the following (circle/enter): ch, sh, th, wh, ng, dg, gh,. Short-Term Objectives - The student will listen to a list of words and raise his/her hand each time a word is spoken that (circle: begins, ends) with a target consonant digraph with no more than errors. Consonant digraphs will include the following (circle/enter): ch, sh, th, wh, ng, dg, gh,. Example: "Raise your hand when you hear a word that begins with \sh\ ": shark... trash... chill...bath... short. Note: Testing (and teaching, if necessary) auditory phonemic discrimination is an important prerequisite to matching letters and sounds. - Given a target consonant digraph and a list of visually similar letter blends/digraphs with some instances of the target digraph, the student will silently read/scan the list of letter groups and circle all instances of the target digraph within the list with no more than errors. Consonant digraphs will include the following (circle/enter): ch, sh, th, wh, ng, dg, gh,. Note: Testing (and teaching, if necessary) visual letter discrimination is an important prerequisite to matching letters and sounds. - When shown a list of (circle: one, two) -syllable words, each containing a consonant digraph in the (circle: initial, medial, final) position that has been omitted and the student is shown a choice of (circle: two, three) consonant digraphs, the student will listen to the words and then circle/point to the correct consonant digraph with no more than errors. Consonant digraphs will include the following (circle/enter): ch, sh, th, wh, ng, dg, gh,. List example: "chop": ch ck sh op Matching Words with Pictures Items with Errors: 3 Annual Goal - Given pictures of common objects, animals, or colors, each with a choice of (circle: two, three, four) one-syllable words with only one word correctly labeling the picture, the student will listen to each picture's name read aloud (or the student will say what is in the picture), and then point to or circle the word that corresponds to the picture with no more than errors. Example: Show a picture of a book with the following three words below the picture: book, bug, duck

8/9/1, Page 15 Sample Report Short-Term Objective - Given picture cards that show common objects, animals, or colors with the same number of one-syllable word cards that label each picture, the student will physically match up each picture with the correct word with no more than errors. Examples of pictures/words: book, bug, bike, dog, cat, car, red, blue End of Report