TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Similar documents
4 SPADINA SUBWAY EXTENSION UPDATE

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Coordinated Transit Planning in Toronto SmartTrack Eglinton West LRT Eglinton East LRT Scarborough Subway Extension Relief Line Waterfront Transit

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Integrating GO RER and SmartTrack. Leslie Woo, Chief Planning Officer February 10, 2016

Stouffville Corridor Rail Service Expansion

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED. SmartTrack Work Plan ( ) SUMMARY. Date: January 16, Executive Committee. To: City Manager.

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK

City Manager, Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, Interim Chief General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission

Growth Management in the City of Brampton

NEW STATION ANALYSIS Methodology and Process. Leslie Woo, Chief Planning Officer September 22, 2015

Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Lawrence Heights Revitalization Corporate Implementation Actions and Social Development Plan

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2016

Transit, Rail, Program, Project & Construction Management Experience

Welcome to the LRT Overview Open House

The total estimated PFC revenue for the application is $266,900,000. The estimated charge effective date for this application is December 1, 2016.

Request for Proposal

Greater Toronto Area Industrial Market Snapshot October 2013

23 Glen Watford Drive - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

S-11: Tacoma Link Extension to Tacoma Community College

Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments

Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project

Phases 2 & 3, & Addendum Urban Structure Plan Options for West Whitby

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project Business Case Executive Summary. February Reviewed by

Alternatives Report. October

Southwest Light Rail Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

GO RAIL OPTIONS BENEFITS CASE ASSESSMENT. June 2010

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF SIOUX LOOKOUT. Request for Proposals

The BIG Move: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area

GO News. gotransit.com GO Transit s Newsletter for Customers summer Keeping You in the Know.

Region of Waterloo Finance Department Financial Services and Development Financing

Evaluation Criteria and Mode Progression for RouteAhead Rapid Transit Projects

Where available we have reviewed preliminary documents completed as part of these studies.

GTA Cordon Count Program

Transitways and the RouteAhead for Calgary Transit

Request to Qualification and Quote Summary of Awarded Contracts (April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012)

Re: 2014 York Region Official Plan Review Cold Creek Road

Attachment 1 CARRUTHERS CREEK FLOOD MANAGEMENT and ANALYSIS DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE

MID-TOWN RE-DEVELOPMENT

Request to Qualification and Quote Summary of Awarded Contracts (April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015)

5 NINTH LINE TRUCK RESTRICTION UPDATE TOWN OF MARKHAM

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

INFRASTRUCTURE POLICIES

SCHNEIDER CREEK REMEDIATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM

General & Development E-Newsletter July/August Inside this Issue!

Design Changes in Queens Revision 14-4M

FLOOD CONTROL REMEDIATION AND FACT SHEETS FOR RESIDENTS ASSOCIATIONS IN MARKHAM

INFORMATION ONLY. Subject: Toronto Transit Expansion Projects Status Update. Date: September 28, 2015

REFERRAL TO RECOMMENDEE DIRECTION REC!II &ED J RECEIPT RECOi'vikiENL,L,

Parkhill Road Sewage Pumping Station Class EA Study

Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project

SECTION 2 CORRIDOR A

1. RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that:

Primer on Transportation Funding and Governance in Canada s Large Metropolitan Areas

Capital Budget & Plan Corporate Report. City of Toronto

Class Environmental Assessment Process Guide

Planning for the future. building a great city, great neighbourhoods

His Worship Jim Watson Mayor of the City of Ottawa 110 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Dear Mr. Mayor,

Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study. Planning Commission February 6, 2014

6/1/2011 Jenna Langdale

50 Bloor Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Comment #1: Provide an interchange at Route 7 and Farm Market Road/White Gate Road. This was studied in the late 1990 s.

The Gateway Program and Hudson Tunnel Project

Six Points Interchange Reconfiguration Class Environmental Assessment Study

Median Bus Lane Design in Vancouver, BC: The #98 B-Line

Effect on structures. Uniform settlement - no concerns. Angular distortion - causes damage due to tensile strain

Calgary LRT Network Plan

BACKGROUND DISCUSSION

Re: Planning and Growth Management Committee Meeting August 7, 2014 McNicoll Bus Garage Transit Project Assessment Study PG35.23

TAC Sustainable Urban Transportation Award Submission by City of Calgary West LRT Project: Enabling Mobility and Transit Oriented Development

3.1 Historical Considerations

Addendum to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

Regional Budget

62-1. U BRAMPTON Report. Planning and Infrastructure Services Committee Committee of the Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton

Development Charge incentives. Yes in town centres. Other exemptions for affordable housing. See Affordable Housing Incentives column

Class Environmental Assessment Schedule B Project File Report

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

Planning for Employment in the Greater Golden Horseshoe May 2008 Background Paper, Places to Grow

Parkway Forest Context Plan

PIPELINE ROUTING PERMIT. For A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DAKOTA AND RAMSEY COUNTIES ISSUED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY D/B/A XCEL ENERGY

53km. Deliver the New Era Network. Island Line Extension. will be added to our Hong Kong network. New Railway Projects are in progress

Ward: Purley DELEGATED BUSINESS MEETING Lead Officer: Head of Planning Control week of 23/03/2009

Cathkin Relief Road Planning Statement

Town of Ajax Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program Information Brochure

COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO.

COWI s Role in the Copenhagen Metro Project

Development Charges in Ontario

TTC AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT NO.

THAT the Metrolinx Annual Report 2015/16 be approved; and

Brookdale Site. CB6 Update April 1, 2015

THE IMPLICATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE GROWTH PATTERNS ON INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER PIPELINES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL REVIEW AND BYLAW REVISION

Section ALTERNATIVES. 3. Alternatives

Transcription:

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: May 1, 2012 SUBJECT: YONGE SUBWAY EXTENSION POST TRANSIT PROJECT ASSESSMENT PROCESS TECHNICAL AMENDMENT ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission authorize staff to proceed with an amendment to the Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) for the following design changes proposed in the Yonge Subway Extension Conceptual Design Study: - The addition of an electrical substation at the Cummer Station and a 20m increase in length of the station box; - The reduction in size of the Steeles Station underground bus terminal and the removal of the bus portal on Yonge Street which accesses the terminal north of Steeles Avenue; - Introduction of a bus loop at Clark Station to reduce bus volumes at Steeles Station; - Removal of Royal Orchard Station from the project; and - The addition of an underground train storage and maintenance facility north of Richmond Hill Station. FUNDING The Yonge North Subway Extension project is included in the TTC 2012-2016 Capital Program budget on page 873 with a total budget of $5.772 million for the Conceptual Design Study. The funding for the Conceptual Design Study was based on a cost sharing agreement; 25% City of Toronto and 75% York Region. The work to amend the current TPAP will be completed within the remaining budget of $1.5 million under the current cost sharing agreement with York Region. BACKGROUND The YSE project is 7.42km in length with 1.6km located in the city of Toronto (south of Steeles Avenue) and 5.81km in York Region (north of Steeles Avenue). The project comprises a total of 5.08km of twin bored tunnel, five stations, two major bus terminals, two bus loops, five substations, eight emergency exit buildings (EEBs), one bridge, six cross passages, 513m of twin or triple box structure and an 831m below grade triple track train

AMENDMENT Page 2 storage facility north of the Richmond Hill Centre Station. There are three sections of special trackwork; the extension of Finch Tail Tracks, the crossover south of Steeles Station, and the crossover south of Richmond Hill Station. On June 15, 2007, the Province of Ontario announced $17.5 billion in funding for transit projects for the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton. Named MoveOntario 2020, the provincial plan included funding for an extension of the Yonge Subway from its current terminus at Finch Station in the city of Toronto to Richmond Hill Centre at Highway 7 in the Town of Richmond Hill. On June 21, 2007, York Region Council authorized a functional planning study in coordination with the TTC and the City of Toronto for the extension of the subway. The Functional Planning Study was completed on October 3, 2008 at which time York Region initiated the TPAP for the YSE project. On January 27, 2009 Toronto City Council adopted the following: Submission of the TPAP as a co-proponent with York Region and the TTC; Confirmed the major components of the project; Directed the City Manager and Chief General Manager of the TTC to commence discussions with Metrolinx, the Province of Ontario, York Region and Government of Canada for the purposes of securing funding and service agreements on the basis of the following requirements: - The City expects the Province will be responsible for all capital costs; - No additional operating costs to the City of Toronto; - TTC will be responsible for project management and delivery; - TTC will operate and maintain the subway infrastructure; - TTC will own the property, assets and subway facilities within York Region. - Design and build using TTC design standards and practices; - Rail Yard Needs Study may identify options in York Region and may require further funding needs; - The Spadina Subway Extension and Automatic Train Operation/Control on the YUS must be in place prior to the opening of the Yonge Subway Extension; - Costs to address capacity of Bloor-Yonge Station and the North York Service Road are to be included as project costs; - Proposed new subway stations and related properties optimize development potential; - The EA process identify development sites along the route and protect for direct links into the proposed subway stations;

AMENDMENT Page 3 - Metrolinx be requested to prioritize the Downtown Relief Line within its 15 year plan; and - Metrolinx be requested to prioritize the Downtown Relief Line in advance of the Yonge Subway Extension. TTC confirm that the SRT project as recommended in the Regional Transportation Plan includes the extension of the SRT to Malvern Town Centre in the first 15 years. TTC develop a more inspiring name for the Downtown Rapid Transit Line. TTC consider the following motions: - Commence proper studies including Environmental Assessments to evaluate the Downtown Rapid Transit Line and Don Mills LRT to move up on the priority list of Metrolinx; - Steeles Avenue Station be designed such that all new lands required (not currently on the road allowance) be on the north side of Steeles Avenue; - The Sheppard Subway Line be extended from Yonge Street to Downsview to provide an alternate route to the Yonge Subway Line into downtown Toronto and access to the Downsview subway maintenance facility; - No capital cost to the city of Toronto for the construction of the Yonge Street Extension and the Sheppard Subway Extension; - TTC be requested to proceed with the studies necessary to construct the Downtown Relief Line. The TTC and the City of Toronto became co-proponents of the transit project which received final approval from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment on April 7, 2009. In July 2009 Metrolinx completed the initial Benefits Case Analysis (BCA) for the YSE based on the findings of the TPAP. The Metrolinx Board directed their staff to undertake additional analysis of the YSE project and examine the following areas: 1. Possible adjustments in timing or phasing of the subway extension; 2. Review of the need for some stations in order to reduce capital costs; 3. Consideration of the parallel GO Richmond Hill rail corridor to off-load some of the demand on Yonge Street; 4. The costs impacts of the various options on the subway yards strategy, Bloor-Yonge Subway station improvements, and a future Downtown Relief Line to bypass the Bloor-Yonge congestion pinch point. In October 2009, the City of Toronto and the Regional Municipality of York authorized the TTC and York Region Rapid Transit Corporation (YRRTC) to proceed with the Conceptual Design Study for the Yonge Subway Extension. The joint venture of McCormick Rankin

AMENDMENT Page 4 Corporation and Hatch Mott MacDonald was retained to carry out this work. The purpose of the study was to undertake the additional analysis resulting from the July 2009 Metrolinx BCA, including an update of the projected ridership and estimated capital costs. The conceptual design also continued to advance the design of the YSE project to maintain a state of readiness for implementation. DISCUSSION The purpose of the Yonge Subway Conceptual Design Study is to enhance definition of preliminary engineering, in order to produce a solid project definition based on reliable estimates of costs, benefits, impacts and risks. The study resulted in the development of a specific project with definitive scope elements, alignment and design features which provide reasonable assurance that the project will meet the objectives and identify the amount of funding required to complete the project. The study results produced changes to the initial TPAP which will require an amendment. The major changes to the Yonge Subway Extension project since the TPAP was approved are as follows: The addition of an electrical substation at the Cummer Station and a shift of the station platform; The reduction in size of the Steeles Station underground bus terminal and the removal of the bus portal on Yonge Street which accessed the terminal north of Steeles Avenue; Introduction of a bus loop at the Clark Station to reduce bus volumes at Steeles Station; Removal of the Royal Orchard Station; and The addition of an underground train storage facility with some maintenance capabilities north of the Richmond Hill Station. Substation - Cummer Station The design of the Yonge Subway Extension which was submitted for the TPAP did not include an electrical substation at Cummer Station. It was initially assumed that the current substation at Finch Station had sufficient capacity and could be utilized to provide sufficient traction power along with the substation at Steeles Station. The analysis carried out during the Conceptual Design Study has shown that there is insufficient capacity at the Finch Station substation and one is now required at Cummer Station. It is proposed that the new substation be located above the main entrance building in the northeast corner of the Yonge Cummer intersection.

AMENDMENT Page 5 The conceptual layout for Cummer Station remains relatively unchanged from the TPAP, however the length of the station box has been increased by approximately 20m as a result of conflicts with an underground storm sewer. This conflict necessitates a modification to the station s ventilation configuration which results in a lengthening of the station box. Bus Terminal - Steeles Station The design of Steeles Station includes an underground bus terminal located within the Steeles Avenue right-of-way; however, the design has evolved. The total number of bus bays required has been reduced from 25 to 16 by relocating some of the York Region Transit (YRT) routes to Clark Station. As a result of relocating some of the YRT routes, there is no longer a requirement to provide a portal on Yonge Street to access the bus terminal from the north. The request to consider shifting the portal access on the east side of Steeles Avenue to the north was investigated, however it was found not to be possible. The design team has met with the land owner on the south west corner of the Yonge/Steeles intersection to discuss opportunities to relocate the bus terminal on that property and this has potential to be explored at a later date. Bus Loop - Clark Station The conceptual layout for Clark Station has evolved since the TPAP to include a bus loop which is incorporated into the already planned combined entrance and electrical substation building. This small bus loop will consist of three bus bays which will allow YRT customers access to the subway sooner rather than travelling to Steeles Station. This reduces the number of bus bays required at Steeles Station and eliminates the need for a portal on Yonge Street. Royal Orchard Station Based on limited redevelopment opportunities and low ridership projections, the Conceptual Design Study recommends that Royal Orchard Station be removed from the YSE project. Future redevelopment potential in the area of the proposed station is limited as a result of its location within the Vaughan Thornhill Heritage Conservation District and the established high and low density residential property which inhibit intensification on the Markham side. The limited redevelopment and land growth opportunities result in the projected subway ridership volume being too low to justify the capital and operating costs associated with a subway station. Train Storage Facility The need for a train storage facility was identified in the TTC Subway Rail Yard Needs Study completed subsequent to TPAP approval for the Yonge Subway Extension. Options which can accommodate 14 train sets and minor maintenance were developed, reviewed and

AMENDMENT Page 6 analyzed. Considerations were given to not preclude a future extension of the Yonge Subway north from Richmond Hill Centre. Three short-listed options were evaluated in terms of: a future 16 th Avenue station, property and building impacts, constructability, future extension, capital and operating costs, noise and vibration, and operational issues. The preferred option for the train storage facility is an 831m long triple track underground structure along the west side of the CN Rail corridor. The train storage facility will require parking and a staff building. The implementation of a train storage facility for the YSE requires a separate TPAP which costs can be accommodated within the budget of existing Conceptual Design Study. JUSTIFICATION The Yonge Subway Extension project is an important project for the TTC, City of Toronto, York Region and Metrolinx. The completion of the amendment to the TPAP will ensure all elements required for the project have the appropriate approvals and property protection in addition to advancing the state of readiness of the project. April 19, 2012 60-1-2 1181556 - - - - - - - - - - - -