A water company s journey for efficient energy management Nikolas Vokhshoori

Similar documents
Southern California Edison s

TOWN OF CARRBORO NORTH CAROLINA

Rick D. Longobart. City of Santa Ana

Proposed San Antonio Sustainability Plan

By: Crystal Warren IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLAR PANELS ON COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND THE COST-BASED INCENTIVES

Executive Summary: PA No. 12 Micro-hydro at Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant

Forecast of Future Electricity Costs in California. Prepared by: Strategic Resource Advisers, LLC November 12, 2014

Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Efficiency Metrics for Projects, Specific Plans, General Plans, and Climate Action Plans

An Airport Sustainable Energy Strategy

Energy Prices, Climate Change Policy and U.S. Economic Growth

Solutions at the Speed of business. Helping small businesses implement climate protection measures quickly, efficiently, and profitably

California Energy Commission 2015 Accomplishments

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER

How To Reduce Energy Use

The Smart Grid: Utility Master Energy & Sustainability Planning

Q Utility Rebate Report. Houston, TX

California Climate Challenge Methodology April 25, 2013

Threshold Determination: California Case Law

Proposed Rates Mandates & Reliability

Business Transformation and Green Fleet Achievements. City of Sacramento

Mailing Address 4650 Adohr Ln. Camarillo, CA Year Financial Analysis. $1,051 / mo (avg) Cost Breakdown. System Description

Clean State Energy Actions 2011 Update. connecticut

Energy Audits Waste Water Treatment Plants


Emissions Inventory, Fiscal Year Siemens Building Technologies Division, U.S. usa.siemens.com/buildingtechnologies

SCE LCE JOINT RATE COMPARISONS GS-2-AE/GS-1

July 6, SUBJECT: Electric Vehicle (EV) and Utilities a Win-Win investment?

Solar Panels and the Smart Grid

SCE LCE JOINT RATE COMPARISONS GS-2-AE/GS-1

Corporate Energy Management Plan

City of Grand Rapids Approach to Renewable Energy (100% Goal By 2020) Haris Alibasic City of Grand Rapids Office of Energy and Sustainability

Environmental Sustainability in 90 Days

NEVADA S ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM AND THE CLEAN POWER PLAN

CLEAN LA SOLAR PROGRAM. Mary Leslie, Los Angeles Business Council

From: Carl Nolen Energy Resource Analyst Approved by: /s/ Ronald V. Stassi Interim General Manager

Southern California Plug-in Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan. Prepared for the Southern California Association of Governments

o SEP grant: $10,000, o Leveraged funds anticipated

Brighter Future: A Study on Solar in K-12 Schools. Wednesday February 4 th 2015

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Corporate Carbon Neutral Plan

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

Carbon Footprint Report

LTES Environmental Management System (EMS) Compliance

Carbon Footprint Calculator for Royal Society of Arts

Q Utility Rebate Report. Fort Worth, TX

Orange. County. Reclamation Plant No. 1 Treatment Plant No. 2. La Habra Brea. Fullerton Placentia Anaheim Villa Park Alamitos.

Prudential plc. Basis of Reporting: GHG emissions data and other environmental metrics.

CRM Sample Questions

Corporate Energy Conservation & Demand Management Plan (CECDMP)

Bill Younger, Manager Business Energy Management Puget Sound Energy Bellevue, Washington

Biosolids Resource Recovery Monthly Report

Making energy a priority

Agenda. Part I: Introduction to OptimumHVAC. Part II: Initial Energy Savings Analysis for MCO Main Terminal. Part III: Case Studies & Conclusion

Real-time energy and water quality management system designed for success!

GM and Ford Investment Plans and California Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards

Tools for Energy Tracking and Benchmarking. ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager for Congregations

Overview. PG&E and Energy Efficiency. CA Energy Efficiency Regulatory & Policy Roadmap. Financing Options for Efficiency & Demand Response

DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY TRACKING SYSTEM

Fleet Management Information Systems. Presentation for: Ron Katz SVP, North American Sales.

CPUC California Solar Initiative 2010 Impact Evaluation

Green Fleet Action Plan

Greater Los Angeles County Region

ALLIED PRINTING SERVICES, INC. CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SOLUTIONS FOR FLEETS

3.13 Energy Conservation

CITY OF ORANGE PROPOSED INCREASE OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) REGARDING ORANGE S PROPOSED WATER RATES AND CHARGES

Simple. Sustainable. SAP SAP AG or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved.

Understanding SDG&E s Electric Rates

Sustainability. at SUNY Empire State College

Proposed Local Law No. 3 Of County Of Ulster

Click to edit Master title style. Paramount Unified School District Board Study Session. Energy Engineered Solar Solutions.

Rules of Thumb Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Redefining Progress Sustainable Indicators Program. Reducing a City s Ecological Footprint: The Case of Santa Monica ( )

City of Santa Ana Sustainability Accomplishments. January 2012

Energy Efficiency Rewards and Incentives

Energy Savings through Solar Energy for Municipalities

Optimization of Energy and Water Quality Management Systems for Drinking Water Utilities [Project #4271]

Measure: Residential Direct Load Control Program (G6b)

Portfolio Manager and Green Power Tracking

Sustainable Manufacturing Seminar. Designing to Sustain the Economy, Environment and Society. Sustainable Product Standards (case-study)

Energy Calculator Tools on the Web

3.1.8 Utilities and Service Systems

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Education Report

City of Columbus Green Fleet Action Plan

[SOLAR SUCCESS] Customer Benefits

Energy Strategic Plan: Energy Independence and Carbon Neutral Campuses Los Angeles Community College District

Running the Electric Meter Backwards: Real-Life Experience with a Residential Solar Power System

County of Hastings. Energy Management Plan. July 1, June 30, 2019

Renewable Choice Energy

Energy Efficiency for. Businesses

Columbia University Master Planning & Optimization

Energy Update Report Summary 2014

The Hidden Costs of Solar Power

An Empirical Analysis of Net Metering

Appendix F. DRECP Energy Development Assumptions and the BLM LUPA

Community Solar Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities Energy 2013 Conference

Clean Diesel versus CNG Buses: Cost, Air Quality, & Climate Impacts

City of Santa Ana Energy Savings Analysis. Prepared for Southern California Edison

Statements of member companies within The Green Grid

Proposal prepared for Happy Solar Owner

Transcription:

A water company s journey for efficient energy management Nikolas Vokhshoori Authors: Nikolas Vokhshoori, Gary Hilliard, Suhail Malki, Ahmet Tatlilioglu Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Waterworks Division

LA County Waterworks Districts A division of the County Department of Public Works Waterworks mission is to provide to provide reliable, high-quality water in a safe, cost-effective, sustainable, and environmentally responsible manner. Supply water to over 250,000 people (3 rd largest water retailer in LA County)

LA County Waterworks Districts 115 water storage reservoirs (over 80 million gallons) 54 groundwater wells 151 booster pumps and pressure regulating stations 1,382 miles of water mains

Previous Energy Efforts Timeclocks Appropriate rate schedules High efficiency motors Routine well maintenance 350 kw Solar power Numerous other efforts

Timeclocks & Rate Schedule Restrict motors from operating during peak intervals Southern California Edison Customers Time of Use (TOU) Installed a series of timeclocks in spring 2013 Summer 2013 operation Summer 2012 operation Summer 2013 bill $120k less than Summer 2012

Timeclocks & Rate Schedule Optimize electric utilities Pumping and Agriculture Rates Option A or Option B Periodic analysis on electric usage 40000 Option A or Option B (For 2014, approximately $50k saved) Choosing TOU-PA-3 A or B 30000 Option B More Calculation Needed kwh 20000 10000 Option A 0 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 kw

Groundwater Wells Waterworks pumped approximately 23,000 acre-feet of water in 2013 Well pumps operating at high efficiency High efficiency motors (motors with η > 95%) Annual pump tests from electric provider (Southern California Edison) Routine well maintenance

Groundwater Wells Results of Well Maintenance Program 2007 to 2013 3,069,500 kwh $317,000 Before Well Rating Production Efficiency 35% Water Quality 20% Production Capacity 15% Sanding 10% Age 10% Casing Condition 5% Slot Visibility 5% Total 100% After

Renewable Energy Constructed Solar Field Array 350 kw worth of solar panels Put into service December 2012 To date generated 2,533,672 kwh Through rebates and generated electricity Saved $735,000» ($380,354 in rebates + electrical savings)

Collective of Previous Efficiency Efforts Efforts have reduced 5.1 million kwh since 2007 6,000,000 Cumulative kwh Reduction 5,000,000 Electrical Consumption 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year

Collective of Previous Efficiency Efforts Efforts have saved approximately $800,000 since 2007 $800,000 Cumulative Cost Savings $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 Amount ($) $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year

Collective of Previous Efficiency Efforts Efforts have eliminated 3,600 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions since 2007 3,600 Cumulative GHG Reduction 3,000 CO2 Equivalent (MT) 2,400 1,800 1,200 600 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year

Current Energy Efficiency Actions Created an Energy Master Plan What is an Energy Master Plan? Portfolio of projects

Goal of Master Plan Identify a portfolio of programs and projects to Reduce costs Reduce the Districts future energy usage Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Anticipation of regulatory requirements Energy conservation Greenhouse gas reduction

Master Plan Process Establish Baseline/Present State Project Identification & Assessment Project Evaluation & Prioritization Project Implementation EMP Tracking

Master Plan Process Establish Baseline/Present State Project Identification & Assessment Project Evaluation & Prioritization Project Implementation EMP Tracking

Establish Baseline/Present State Baseline tries to determine a reference point Baseline is defined as o Average of data from 2011, 2012, & 2013 Electrical consumption Electrical cost Greenhouse gas emissions

Energy Consumption Forecast Establish Baseline/Present State 50,000,000 Waterworks Forecasted Electrical Consumption Electrical Consumption (kwh) 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 2013 Baseline 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 Year Waterworks

Energy Cost Forecast Establish Baseline/Present State 12,000,000 Waterworks Forecasted Annual Electrical Cost 10,000,000 Electrical Cost ($) 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 2013 Baseline 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 Year Waterworks

Establish Baseline/Present State 35,000 Waterworks Forecasted GHG Footprint Greenhouse Gas Footprint (MT CO2 eq) 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Baseline 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 Year Waterworks

Master Plan Process Establish Baseline/Present State Project Identification & Assessment Project Evaluation & Prioritization Project Implementation EMP Tracking

Project Identification Project Identification & Assessment 1. Project Identification form a. Idea that positively affects water system 2. Project compiling a. Qualitative approach to filtering meaningful projects

Project Assessment Project Identification & Assessment 3. Project assessment a. Quantitative approach to measuring projects b. Project assessment form

Energy Project Amalgamation Project Identification & Assessment Renewable Energy Projects Coastline Dr. System Improvement Carbon Mesa System Improvement Electric Vehicles Customer Water Meters Sweetwater Mesa System Improvement Coolwater System Improvement VFD at Calmgarden Savings $60,000,000 Project Costs $31,000,000 Modify Vehicle Fleet

Energy Project Amalgamation Project Identification & Assessment Renewable Energy Projects Coastline Dr. System Improvement Carbon Mesa System Improvement Electric Vehicles Customer Water Meters Sweetwater Mesa System Improvement Coolwater System Improvement VFD at Calmgarden kwh Reduction 467,780,000 GHG Elimination 326,000 MT Modify Vehicle Fleet

Master Plan Process Establish Baseline/Present State Project Identification & Assessment Project Evaluation & Prioritization Project Implementation EMP Tracking

Project Evaluation Project Evaluation & Prioritization Developed procedure to measure project ideas objectively. Meet with project proposers to render scores Project Development & Constructability Cost/Cost-Effectiveness GHG Impacts and Environmental Impacts Operational Impacts

Master Plan Process Establish Baseline/Present State Project Identification & Assessment Project Evaluation & Prioritization Project Implementation EMP Tracking

Project Implementation Assign project to appropriate team Investigate funding Prepare project schedule

$50,000,000 Energy Master Plan Projects Net Present Value Waterworks Forecasted Energy Project Savings $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 Amount ($) $10,000,000 $0 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 -$10,000,000 -$20,000,000 -$30,000,000 Year

Waterworks Electrical Consumption Forecast with Priority Projects 50,000,000 Waterworks Forecasted Electrical Consumption Electrical Consumption (kwh) 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 Year Waterworks (No Change) Waterworks (EMP Implemented)

Waterworks Annual Electric Cost Forecast with Priority Projects $12,000,000 Waterworks Forecasted Annual Electrical Cost $10,000,000 Electrical Cost ($) $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 Year Waterworks (EMP Implemented) Waterworks (No Change)

Waterworks GHG Footprint Forecast with Priority Projects 35,000 Waterworks Forecasted GHG Footprint Greenhouse Gas Footprint (MT CO2 eq) 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 Year Waterworks (EMP Implemented) Waterworks (No Change)

Master Plan Process Establish Baseline/Present State Project Identification & Assessment Project Evaluation & Prioritization Project Implementation EMP Tracking

Master Plan Process Establish Baseline/Present State Project Identification & Assessment Project Evaluation & Prioritization Project Implementation EMP Tracking

Tracking Each year after project completion monitor energy consumption and savings. Every 3 to 5 years, update the plan.

Master Plan Process Establish Baseline/Present State Project Identification & Assessment Project Evaluation & Prioritization Project Implementation EMP Tracking

Efficiency Efforts Summary Past (2007 to Present) 5.1 million kwh Reduced 3,600 MT CO 2 GHG Eliminated $1.1 million Saved Future 2034 Reduce electrical consumption: 378 million kwh Eliminate greenhouse gas emissions: 263,800 MT CO 2 equivalence (55,400 cars or 24,000 homes) $43.8 million Saved

Acknowledgments Malibu Field Office Lancaster Field Staff

Questions? Contact information Nikolas Vokhshoori nvokhshoori@dpw.lacounty.gov