Cooper Creek Aquatic Habitat Survey

Similar documents
Year Post Restoration Monitoring Summary Rock Creek Project Monitoring and Analysis conducted by Bio-Surveys,LLC. Contact: strask@casco.

Thin Air and Thick Ice Unusual Challenges at a High Elevation Hydro Plant

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

Habitat Quality, Rainbow Trout Occurrence, and Steelhead Recovery Potential Upstream of Searsville Dam

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

Assessing Rivers for Restoration Purposes. Ann L. Riley Waterways Restoration Institute

Neversink River East Branch

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

STREAM NOTES To Aid in Securing Favorable Conditions of Water Flows

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

A Reconnaissance Survey Of Le Moray Lake #3

DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

Urban Stream Restoration Implementation Auburn, AL March 13-14

Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide. River crossings

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Appendix H Dredging and Stream Channel Restoration

Napa River Restoration Projects

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Flood Hazard Area Technical Manual Section 8 Bank Stabilization and Stream Restoration

Common Problems Addressed in Stream Restoration

ROGUE RIVER SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CONSERVATION PLAN. Evaluation of spring Chinook salmon spawning in Big Butte Creek, 2008

21. Soil and Water: Restoration

JOE RICH CREEK CHANNEL ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION OPPORTUNITIES

A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast

UPPER DESCHUTES R-EMAP TEMPERATURE SUMMARY

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

Salt Lake County June 2010 Flooding and Restoration

Sand and Silt Removal from Salmonid Streams

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013


FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MANCOS RIVER WATERSHED:

Penticton Creek May 4, 2015 Council Meeting

High Definition Stream Surveys of Choccolocco and Cheaha Creeks, AL 2015

Evaluation of Open Channel Flow Equations. Introduction :

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management

COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests 2013 Flood: Long-term Recovery in a Changed Landscape

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

EMERGENCY HOME PROTECTION. Homeowner's Guide for Emergency Flood Control. Contents INTRODUCTION

Restoration of Cold Water Refugia in the Columbia River Estuary. *Chris Collins, Catherine Corbett, Keith Marcoe, Paul Kolp, Matthew Schwartz

Appendix C. Project Opportunities. Middle Twisp River (RM )

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

LYNDE CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Accretion Sediments carried by a stream and deposited along banks or surrounding areas.

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

Upper Pitt River Water Power Project Project Description Appendix I - Photographs

PROJECT STATUS REPORT. Development of microhabitat suitability criteria for fry and juvenile salmonids of the Trinity River

Outlet stabilization structure

City of Austin Stream Restoration Program Mid-Atlantic Stream Restoration Conference, Rocky Gap, MD November 2011

RESTORING streams to reduce flood loss

Prepared by: Siskiyou Research Group P.O. Box 2550 Cave Junction, OR For Public Review

Lesson 3: Fish Life Cycle

Upper River Witham: Easton Version 1 ( )

Big Thompson River Restoration Coalition Best Practice Recommendations and Resources for river front land owners impacted by the flood.

Habitat of rivers and creeks

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Bull Run River. Water Temperature Evaluation. Prepared by: City of Portland Bureau of Water Works Portland, Oregon

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

Community Outreach Kickoff Summaries. Boulder Creek and South Boulder Creek Meeting held Jan. 8, 2014, approximately 80 attendees

Stream Crossing Quality Index (SCQI) Survey For 8 Sub-basins of Tree Farm License #30 Prince George Forest District

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS

a. For all activities that would result in the discharge of fill material into any vernal pool;

Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008

Concepts for Post Flood River Corridor Restoration

How To Assess An Area For Erosion

King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012

Code of Practice for Pipelines and Telecommunication Lines Crossing a Water Body

How To Fix A Creek In Sandon

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Hayman Restoration Partnership

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

Crossing creeks Stream crossings on farms

How To Write A Watercourse Crossing

Sediment Supply and the Upland-Stream Connection. Brian Bledsoe Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Colorado State University

COLORADO FRONT RANGE FLOOD OF 2013:

FINAL. Ecological Restoration Monitoring Plan Habitat Restoration Design Projects St. Clair River Area of Concern, Michigan

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

Assessment of the White Salmon Watershed Using the Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment Model

EcoStream Stream Ecology & Restoration Conference Restoration Planning & Prioritization Session

Watersheds, Streams, & Highways: Resiliency in Disaster Recovery Through Partnerships and Innovation

HUDSON RIVER-BLACK RIVER REGULATING DISTRICT BOARD MEETING JUNE 10, 2014

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

Proposal to the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG)

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

International Approaches to Achieving Ecological Objectives of Urban River Basin Enhancement

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Transcription:

Cooper Creek Aquatic Habitat Survey

2002 Cooper Creek Aquatic Habitat Survey Program Objective: Document Baseline Aquatic Habitat Conditions Tasks: 1. Conduct a modified Tier 3 survey between the mouth of Cooper Creek and the mouth of the canyon (Alluvial Reach). 2. Divide the Canyon Reach by major tributaries: Survey each segment at the Tier 2 level. Conduct Tier 3 survey 100 m above and below each major tributary and 100 m in middle of each segment. 3. Conduct a modified Tier 3 survey on the portion of the stream between Stetson Creek and the first impassable falls (Stetson Reach). 4. Conduct a Tier 2 survey of high gradient segment between the lower and upper impassable falls (Falls Reach). 5. Conduct a Tier 2 survey from upper impassable falls to Cooper Lake dam (Lake Reach)

Alluvial Reach: 1,128 meters Channel Type: MM1 = 450 m, MM2 = 678 m, (narrow floodplain) Gradient: 1.5% Dominant Pool Habitat: PL-mcs = 515 m 2 PL-pp = 125 m 2 PL-lsc = 86 m 2 Dominant Fastwater Habitat: RF-cb (entire reach) Side Channel Habitat: 1,368 m 2 468 m (length) Dominant Side Channel Pool Habitat: PL-mcs = 36 m 2 PL-pp = 33 m 2 Comments: Main Channel pebble counts indicated adequate spawning gravels at 32-180 mm (13-100 m ideal). Substrate imbededness was not evident. Several large wood clusters, minimal undercut bank. Upper portion of reach characterized by a long strait channel, with severe erosional features on both banks moving into canyon reach. Canyon Reach 4,200 meters Channel Type: MM2 = 320 m, MC2 > 2,200 m Gradient: 3-5% Dominant Pool Habitat: PL-pp, in RF-bd fastwater habitat PL-pp & PL-mcs, in CS-sp fastwater habitat Dominant Fastwater Habitat: RF-bd Side Channel Habitat: 39 m 2 140 m length Dominant Side Channel Pool Habitat: PL-mcs 37 m 2 Comments: Additional data needed for canyon reach, current information based on 2,500 m tier two & 200 m tier three. Deeply incised channel, significant amount of sediment transport, avalanche disturbance. Contains cascading step-pool sections, bedrock channel with perpendicular side slopes in areas. Three active mine sites with small instream dredges, affects appear to be localized. Side channel habitat and large wood are minimal. Side channels are predominantly ephemeral some residual pools.

Stetson Reach 1,443 meters Channel Type: MC2 = 1,370 m, HC4 = 705 m Gradient: 2-6% Dominant Pool Habitat: BP 1,450 m 2 GL-gl 800 m 2 PL-pp, PL-dm 140 m 2 Dominant Fastwater Habitat: RF-bd 2,860 m RF-cb 1620 m Side Channel Habitat: 303 m 2 166 m length Dominant Side Channel Pool Habitat: N/A Comments: Diverse pool / riffle habitat, avalanche disturbance. Reduced flow may be causing channel to fill with sediment and debris from tributary and avalanche inputs. Flood peaks range from 0-8% of pre-dam values (USFS, 2002). No fish passage barriers largest jump height approx four feet. Significant amounts of large wood. Falls Reach 438 meters Channel Type: HC4 = 438 m Gradient: 5-8%, Waterfalls Dominant Pool Habitat: BP Dominant Fastwater Habitat: RF-bd (mostly interspersed with beaver ponds) Side Channel Habitat: N/A Dominant Side Channel Pool Habitat: N/A Comments: Barrier falls located 7.1 kilometers from mouth approximately, 60 ft high. A total of four waterfalls, scour pools at base of filling with silt. Characterized by a steep gradient falls section interspersed with beaver ponds. Significant amounts of wood tied up in beaver ponds (Falls and Lake reaches).

Lake Reach 417 meters Channel Type: Continuous Complex of Beaver Ponds 235 m Disturbed Channel 170 m Gradient: 2-3% Dominant Pool Habitat: BP 1 Dominant Fastwater Habitat: BP Side Channel Habitat: N/A Dominant Side Channel Pool Habitat: N/A Comments: Side slopes begin to shallow, little avalanche influence, highly disturbed channel nearly dry.

Cooper Creek Pool Habitat Richness La ke 2.2 Falls 6.2 Stetson 3.5 Canyon 1. 7 Allu v ial 2.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pools / 100 Meters

ALLUVIAL REACH

CANYON REACH

CANYON REACH

STETSON CREEEK: 20 CFS (9-4-02 USGS Station)

STETSON CREEK: 180 CFS (11-5-02 USGS Station)

STETSON REACH

STETSON REACH

LOWER FALLS Start of Falls Reach

LAKE REACH