Wolf Point Public Schools

Similar documents
Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School

Allen Elementary School

Bangor Central Elementary School Annual Education Report

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Introduction: Online school report cards are not new in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has been

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

The New York State Report Card

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

The New York State District Report Card. This District s Report Card. Use this report to: Accountability and Overview Report

Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

Advanced Program Information The percentage of students enrolled in advanced programs is a key indicator of school quality at the secondary level.

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL WARREN 1500 ROUTE 57 WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL

State of New Jersey

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

State of New Jersey

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW SCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY AND TOURI PASSAIC 150 PARK AVENUE PATERSON CITY

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Westview Early Childhood Education Center 1100 Patterson Street, Petersburg, VA 23803

State of New Jersey

Bryan Middle School. Bryan Middle School. Not Actual School Data. 100 Central Dr Anywhere, DE (555) Administration.

How To Ask A School Administrator A Question About Your School

Moberly School District. Moberly School District. Annual District Report Accredited with Distinction.

Orange County High 201 Selma Road, Orange, VA 22960

Illinois Criteria for Meeting the NCLB Requirements for Highly Qualified Teachers

Bowler School District Bowler, Wisconsin. First-Year Report: Fall 2005 Data

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT

South Dakota DOE Report Card

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

ACT High School Profile Report. The Graduating Class of 2007 Wyoming

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) Title III, Part A Accountability System

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Parent and Community Survey

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Highly Qualified Teachers Workbook

State of Colorado K-12 Mandate

Iowa School District Profiles. Central City

South Carolina State Report Card

NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND (NCLB) HIGHLY QUALIFIED SUMMARY REPORT

TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT

TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATTERN OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE COURSES TAKEN AND TEST SCORES ON ITED FOR HIGH SCHOOL JUNIORS

ARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at

San Joaquin County Special Education

South Dakota DOE Report Card

OVERVIEW OF DISTRICT PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

Huntsville City. Superintendent Dr. Ann R. Moore

Illinois e-plans. Title I District Plan Checklist

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

District Demographic Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Purpose of Report: To inform the Board of the 2013 District demographics.

Executive Summary DRAFT. Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary School

State of New Jersey

The Math TLC Master s in Mathematics for Secondary Teachers Program

TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT

For Canyon View School

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

WORLD S BEST WORKFORCE PLAN

A Comparison of the Top Ten High School Cohorts and Regents

District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced) State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)

2013 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment. Executive Summary

Evaluation of the Seattle Public School s Family Support Program

ty School District Digita al Classrooms Plan

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW SCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY & TOURISM PASSAIC 150 PARK AVENUE PATERSON CITY

Accountability and Virginia Public Schools

School Performance Framework: Technical Guide

Methodology, business rules, and data components used in the implementation of the Washington State Equity Plan, 2015

TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT, PERSONNEL SERVICES

2015 TN Accountability Protocol

Mississippi Department of Education Highly Qualified Teacher Criteria The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

River Islands Technology Academy School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

Personnel TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT

Santa Clarita Valley International

74% 68% 47% 54% 33% Staying on Target. ACT Research and Policy. The Importance of Monitoring Student Progress toward College and Career Readiness

John Muir Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

SCHOOL YEAR

District Name: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS UNIVERSITY CHA Campus Name: TNC CAMPUS (TEXAS NEUROREHABILITAT Campus Number:


2009 CREDO Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) Stanford University Stanford, CA June 2009

Elmhurst Community Prep

Office of Institutional Research & Planning

New Jersey High School Performance Ranking - A Summary

Conducting the Parent and Family Involvement Survey for your school(s): Instructions and Guidelines

Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High

Alliance Media Arts and Entertainment Design High

Evaluating the School Strategic Plan Components Title I Rubric for Schoolwide Projects

State of New Jersey

Transcription:

Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School Wolf Point, Montana Districts 45 and 45A Report Card 2013-2014 School Year

BELIEVE -- ACHIEVE -- SUCCEED Mission Statement: In partnership with the community, Wolf Point Public Schools will createa positive teaching and learning environment to ensure that every member of the school family reaches academic achievement as set by local, state, and federal standards. We are determined to utilize comprehensive school-wide research based strategies to assure this outcome. Vision Statements: All children will read at or above grade levels by the end of the third grade and remain on or above grade level thereafter. All children feel safe, welcome, and successful. All children appreciate their unique qualities, cultures, and their role as valued members of their school family. All students are responsible for caring for self, caring for others, and caring for property. All students have the opportunity to learn from their mistakes. All children, regardless of race or economic status, have fair and equal treatment. All students and school personnel have clear and focused individual goals. All school personnel are respectful, tolerant of differences, consistent, and nurturing. All school personnel are competent in fulfilling job responsibilities. All parents and community members show respect for education through their availability and involvement. All parents, community members, and school personnel work together to assist children to become productive members of their school and community.

Number of Students Wolf Point Public Schools Total Enrollment 890 880 870 860 850 840 Enrolled 830 820 810 800 790 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 School Years Wolf Point Public Schools 2013-2014 Racial/Ethnic Groups Two or more races 16.4% Hispanic 4.8% Asian 0.4% White 14.7% Pacific Islander 0.0% Native American 63.7% Native American Asian Hispanic Two or more races White Pacific Islander The two largest racial/ethnic groups in the Wolf Point Public Schools were Native Americans with a little over 63% and Two or more races with about 16%.

Percentage of Students in Attendance Southside Northside J.H. H.S. Attendance Rate 88% 89% 84% 84% Attendance Rate 2013-2014 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Southside Northside J.H. H.S. Attendance Rate As part of No Child Left Behind, elementary and middle schools must have an 80% attendance rate (or improvement toward that goal) to make adequate yearly progress (AYP). Attendance is based on total enrollment, not just the tested grades of 3-8 and 10. Attendance does not apply concerning AYP for high schools. The above attendance rates are for the entire academic year and are little changed from the previous year. Southside Northside J.H. H.S. Reading / M ath Reading / M ath Reading / M ath Reading / M ath Test Participation Rate 100% / 100% 100% / 100% 99% / 99% 97% / 97% AYP is determined using reading and math test scores, test participation rates (minimum of 95%), improvement on test scores, attendance rates, graduation rates (85%), and effectiveness reports. Each school's test scores are divided into student subgroups based on race/ethnicity, free/reduced lunch status, students with disabilities, and LEP (Limited English Proficiency). The "All Students" group needs to have 30 students and all other subgroups need to have 30 students as well in order for scores to be used for the AYP calculated process. The minimum number of students for test participation rates is 40. All information for 2013-14 was carried over from the previous year. MontCAS = Montana Comprehensive Assessment System CRT = Criterion-Referenced Tests (MontCAS Phase 2) MAP = Measures of Academic Progress Test A statewide report card may be accessed online at www.opi.mt.gov and selecting the Reports and Data tab followed by selecting NCLB Report Card from the list. Information for each school and district is available at this website.

Percentage of Students Graduating Montana WPHS Graduation Rate 84.2% 70.4% Graduation Rate 2013 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Montana WPHS Graduation Rate High Schools must show an 85% graduation rate (or improvement toward that goal) to make AYP The 2013 graduation rate is used for the 2013-14 AYP determinations. 2013-2014 School Year AYP Status for Wolf Point Public Schools Reading Math Improvement AYP Status Status Status Status Southside Yr1 Yr1 Ryr4 Did not make AYP Northside HRYr3 RYr7 RYr7 Did not make AYP WP Jr. High ImYr2 RYr4 RYr5 Did not make AYP WPHS ImYr2 RYr3 RYr5 Did not make AYP WP Elem. CYr7 CYr7 CYr7 Did not make AYP HS District ImYr2 CYr4 CYr6 Did not make AYP RYr3 =Restructuring Year 3 RYr4 = Restructuring Year 4 RYr5 = Restructuring Year 5 RYr7 = Restructuring Year 7 ImYr2 = 2nd Year Identified for Improvement HRYr3 = Holding at Restructuring Year 3 CYr4 = Corrective Action Year 4 CYr6 = Corrective Action Year 6 Yr1 = 1st Year did not make AYP (Watch List) CYr 7 = Corrective Action Year 7 The AYP status for 2012-13 was carried forward for 2013-2014. The state of Montana is in the 11th Year Identified for Improvement.

Percentages Southside Northside JH HS Montana Highly Qualified 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% Percentage of Highly Qualified Teachers Core Academic Subjects 2012-2013 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% Southside Northside JH HS Montana Highly Qualified Montana teachers meet the definition of a highly qualified teacher if they are licensed and endorsed in the areas in which they teach by the Montana Office of Public Instruction. "Core Academic Subjects" are English, reading, language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and government, economics, arts, history, and geography. All Wolf Point Public schools had 100% highly qualified teachers. Our schools are classified as high poverty schools. For Montana, 16.6% of the teachers are at high poverty schools, 20.5% at low poverty schools, and 62.3% at mid-range poverty schools All paraprofessionals who assist in student instruction in the Wolf Point Public Schools have met the NCLB requirement of highly qualified by successfully completing one of the three following categories: AA degree or higher, 2 years of relevant college course work, or the Language Arts/Quantitative Skills Assessment. During the 2013-2014 school year, local and grant funds for professional development for certified and classified staff were spent in training them to work with students in the areas of reading, math, science, technology, health, and behavioral issues. At the time of publishing this report card, the Montana OPI had not released the highly qualified teacher ratings for the 2013-2014 school year.

Number of Staff Percent of Staff Class 7 BA BA + 30 MA MA + 10 PhD Percent of Staff 1% 48% 13% 16% 22% 0% 2013-2014 Wolf Point Public Schools Professional Qualifications 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Class 7 BA BA + 30 MA MA + 10 PhD Percent of Staff Degrees Earned * 37.9% of the staff had a Master's degree or higher. * 61% of the staff had a Bachelor's degree to +30 semester credits. Years of Experience 6-11- for 2013-14 School Year 0-5 10 Teaching/Education 15 16-20 21-25 26+ Years of 30 Experience 25 20 16 14 7 12 13 20 20 16 15 14 12 13 10 5 0 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26+ 7 Years of Experience Years 36 (43.9%) of the certified staff were in their first 10 years of experience. 21 (25.6%) of the certified staff were in their 11-20 years of experience. 25 (30.5%) of the certified staff were in their 21+ years of experience.

Climate Surveys were conducted in May of the 2013-2014 school year. 2013-2014 Elementary District Climate Survey Results: OVERALL: Students agree their families want them to do well in school and believe that they can do well in school. They feel that their teachers believe they can learn, but are concerned about students treating each other with respect and being friendly. Upper elementary students are tending to disagree in feeling that they have freedom at school and choices in what they learn. They also feel that they could be better students. Parents agree they support their child's learning at home and feel good about themselves as a parent. Parents agree that they respect the schools' teachers and principals. They feel that their children are safe going to and from school. Upper elementary parents are concerned about students showing respect for other students. Teachers love seeing the results of their work with students, they love to teach, that learning can be fun, and every student can learn. They also believe that student achievement can increase through a threat-free environment and effective parent involvement. Upper elementary teachers are neutral in feeling that morale is high on the part of the support staff. Junior High teachers are concerned about working effectively with low achieving students. All teachers are concerned about the public image of each school. Classified Staff love seeing the results of their work with students, believe it is important to communicate often with parents, and believe quality work is expected of them. They are clear about what their job is at the school and the administrator treats them with respect. Some are concerned about the public image of the schools. Elementary and High School Secretarial, Kitchen, and Custodial Staff believe quality work is expected of them and feel like they belong at the school. They are neutral in feeling that the schools have a good public image and morale is high among support staff. One group strongly disagrees that their administrator facilitates communication effectively. 2013-2014 High School District Climate Survey Results: OVERALL: Students felt doing well in school makes them feel good about themselves and they have confidence in their ability to learn on their own outside of a classroom. They have confidence in their ability to read and process information. They were neutral in feeling that they are in charge of what they learn and what they learn in school is relevant to real life. Also, they were neutral in feeling that school is fun and that they like the school. Parents agree that they support their child's learning at home, parent volunteers are vital to the school community, and believe that they feel welcome at the school. They are neutral in believing that calls to the school are returned in a timely manner, that the school clearly communicates how parent volunteers can help, and that the school has a good public image. Teachers love seeing the results of their work with students, love to teach, that learning can be fun, that every student can learn, believe that student achievement can increase through effective parent involvement and "hands-on" learning. It is important to communicate often with parents. They are neutral in believing that teachers communicate with each other to make student learning consistent across grades, that morale is high on the part of teachers, and disagree that the school has a good public image. Classified Staff agree quality work is expected of them, they are clear about what their job is at the school. that the administrator treats them with respect, and that they feel recognized for good work. They are neutral in believing that moral is high on the part of students, teachers, and support staff. There is concern about the school having a good public image. Complete results of the climate survey will be found in the Five-Year Comprehensive School Improvement Plans found in each school's library, the principal's office, and the district office.

Grade 3 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students 2011-12 73% 84% 57% 72% 2012-13 49% 84% 26% 69% 2013-14 49% 84% 26% 69% Fem ales 2011-12 73% 87% 48% 72% 2012-13 56% 86% 22% 69% 2013-14 56% 86% 22% 69% Males 2011-12 74% 82% 67% 73% 2012-13 42% 82% 32% 70% 2013-14 42% 82% 32% 70% LEP (Lim ited English 2011-12 35% 48% 25% 28% Proficient) 2012-13 19% 48% 0% 29% 2013-14 19% 48% 0% 29% Econom ically 2011-12 73% 77% 57% 61% Disadvantaged 2012-13 49% 77% 26% 57% 2013-14 49% 77% 26% 57% Special Education 2011-12 NR 56% NR 43% 2012-13 25% 57% 8% 37% 2013-14 25% 57% 8% 37% Without Disabilities 2011-12 80% 88% 62% 76% 2012-13 54% 88% 31% 73% 2013-14 54% 88% 31% 73% Native Am erican 2011-12 71% 65% 52% 45% 2012-13 46% 63% 26% 39% 2013-14 46% 63% 26% 39% White/Non-Hispanic 2011-12 NR 87% NR 77% 2012-13 NR 89% NR 75% 2013-14 NR 89% NR 75% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 3 in 2011-12 and 94.8% in 2012-13 M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 3 in 2011-12 and 90% in 2012-13 Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 3 in 2013-14 M ath AYP for CRT =100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 3 in 2013-14 These test results are for different groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student confidentiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores for 2012-13 were carried forward for the 2013-14 school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.

Grade 4 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Grade 4 Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students 2011-12 49% 84% 38% 69% 2012-13 64% 83% 38% 67% 2013-14 64% 83% 38% 67% Fem ales 2011-12 42% 87% 36% 69% 2012-13 69% 85% 39% 67% 2013-14 69% 85% 39% 67% Males 2011-12 57% 83% 41% 69% 2012-13 58% 80% 36% 69% 2013-14 58% 80% 36% 69% LEP (Lim ited English 2011-12 0% 40% 0% 24% Proficient) 2012-13 24% 35% 0% 25% 2013-14 24% 35% 0% 25% Econom ically 2011-12 49% 77% 38% 57% Disadvantaged 2012-13 64% 74% 38% 56% 2013-14 64% 74% 38% 56% Special Education 2011-12 NR 56% NR 37% 2012-13 NR 51% NR 35% 2013-14 NR 51% NR 35% Without Disabilities 2011-12 54% 89% 43% 73% 2012-13 69% 86% 43% 72% 2013-14 69% 86% 43% 72% Native Am erican 2011-12 47% 64% 34% 40% 2012-13 60% 60% 32% 41% 2013-14 60% 60% 32% 41% White/Non-Hispanic 2011-12 NR 89% NR 74% 2012-13 NR 87% NR 73% 2013-14 NR 87% NR 73% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 4 in 2011-12 and 94.8% in 2012-13 M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 4 in 2011-12 and 90% in 2012-13 Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 4 in 2013-14 M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 4 in 2013-14 These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The 2012-13 scores were carried forward for the 2013-14 school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.

Grade 5 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students 2011-12 71% 88% 53% 73% 2012-13 66% 85% 39% 70% 2013-14 66% 85% 39% 70% Fem ales 2011-12 82% 91% 59% 73% 2012-13 67% 88% 37% 71% 2013-14 67% 88% 37% 71% Males 2011-12 64% 85% 50% 73% 2012-13 65% 83% 41% 70% 2013-14 65% 83% 41% 70% LEP (Lim ited English 2011-12 38% 45% 8% 22% Proficient) 2012-13 17% 42% 0% 24% 2013-14 17% 42% 0% 24% Econom ically 2011-12 71% 81% 53% 62% Disadvantaged 2012-13 66% 76% 39% 59% 2013-14 66% 76% 39% 59% Special Education 2011-12 27% 58% 27% 36% 2012-13 NR 53% NR 33% 2013-14 NR 53% NR 33% Without Disabilities 2011-12 83% 92% 61% 78% 2012-13 74% 88% 43% 74% 2013-14 74% 88% 43% 74% Native Am erican 2011-12 71% 68% 52% 44% 2012-13 65% 63% 33% 42% 2013-14 65% 63% 33% 42% White/Non-Hispanic 2011-12 NR 91% NR 79% 2012-13 NR 89% NR 76% 2013-14 NR 89% NR 76% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 5 in 2011-12 and 94.8% in 2012-13 M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 5 in 2011-12 and 90% in 2012-13 Reading AYP for CRT =100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 5 in 2013-14 M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 5 in 2013-14 These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores for 2012-2013 were carried forward for the 2013-14 school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.

Grade 6 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students 2011-12 71% 89% 52% 69% 2012-13 76% 86% 39% 65% 2013-14 76% 86% 39% 65% Fem ales 2011-12 93% 92% 58% 68% 2012-13 90% 89% 40% 64% 2013-14 90% 89% 40% 64% Males 2011-12 53% 86% 47% 69% 2012-13 65% 82% 38% 65% 2013-14 65% 82% 38% 65% LEP (Lim ited English 2011-12 27% 47% 27% 23% Proficient) 2012-13 30% 43% 10% 20% 2013-14 30% 43% 10% 20% Econom ically 2011-12 71% 82% 52% 57% Disadvantaged 2012-13 76% 78% 39% 51% 2013-14 76% 78% 39% 51% Special Education 2011-12 NR 56% NR 26% 2012-13 NR 49% NR 24% 2013-14 NR 49% NR 24% Without Disabilities 2011-12 81% 93% 61% 74% 2012-13 88% 90% 44% 69% 2013-14 88% 90% 44% 69% Native Am erican 2011-12 68% 71% 47% 43% 2012-13 75% 67% 33% 36% 2013-14 75% 67% 33% 36% White/Non-Hispanic 2011-12 NR 92% NR 73% 2012-13 NR 89% NR 70% 2013-14 NR 89% NR 70% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 6 in 2011-12 and 94.8% in 2012-13 M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 6 in 2011-12 and 90% in 2012-13 Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 6 in 2013-14 M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 6 in 2013-14 These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores for 2012-13 were carried forward for the 2013-14 school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.

Grade 7 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students 2011-12 74% 89% 30% 67% 2012-13 64% 83% 36% 70% 2013-14 64% 83% 36% 70% Fem ales 2011-12 78% 92% 29% 69% 2012-13 72% 88% 43% 70% 2013-14 72% 88% 43% 70% Males 2011-12 68% 85% 31% 66% 2012-13 54% 79% 39% 69% 2013-14 54% 79% 39% 69% LEP (Lim ited English 2011-12 50% 44% 9% 17% Proficient) 2012-13 19% 33% 27% 17% 2013-14 19% 33% 27% 17% Econom ically 2011-12 74% 82% 30% 54% Disadvantaged 2012-13 64% 75% 36% 57% 2013-14 64% 75% 36% 57% Special Education 2011-12 NR 58% NR 25% 2012-13 NR 44% NR 25% 2013-14 NR 44% NR 25% Without Disabilities 2011-12 77% 93% 33% 73% 2012-13 68% 88% 39% 75% 2013-14 68% 88% 39% 75% Native Am erican 2011-12 70% 72% 24% 39% 2012-13 58% 61% 35% 42% 2013-14 58% 61% 35% 42% White/Non-Hispanic 2011-12 NR 92% NR 72% 2012-13 NR 87% NR 75% 2013-14 NR 87% NR 75% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 7 in 2011-12 and 94.8% in 2012-13 M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 7 in 2011-12 and 90% in 2012-13 Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 7 in 2013-14 M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 7 in 2013-14 These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The scores for 2012-13 were carried forward for the 2013-2014 school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.

Grade 8 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students 2011-12 65% 86% 37% 65% 2012-13 74% 83% 27% 63% 2013-14 74% 83% 27% 63% Fem ales 2011-12 74% 90% 35% 65% 2012-13 85% 88% 35% 64% 2013-14 85% 88% 35% 64% Males 2011-12 57% 83% 39% 65% 2012-13 63% 80% 19% 62% 2013-14 63% 80% 19% 62% LEP (Lim ited English 2011-12 21% 28% 7% 12% Proficient) 2012-13 47% 33% 7% 17% 2013-14 47% 33% 7% 17% Econom ically 2011-12 65% 78% 37% 51% Disadvantaged 2012-13 74% 75% 27% 50% 2013-14 74% 75% 27% 50% Special Education 2011-12 NR 50% NR 22% 2012-13 NR 48% NR 22% 2013-14 NR 48% NR 22% Without Disabilities 2011-12 76% 92% 43% 70% 2012-13 73% 88% 26% 67% 2013-14 73% 88% 26% 67% Native Am erican 2011-12 60% 65% 34% 34% 2012-13 69% 60% 18% 33% 2013-14 69% 60% 18% 33% White/Non-Hispanic 2011-12 NR 90% NR 70% 2012-13 NR 88% NR 69% 2013-14 NR 88% NR 69% Reading AYP for CRT =89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 8 in 2011-12 and 94.8% in 2012-13 M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 8 in 2011-12 and 90% in 2012-13 Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 8 in 203-14 M ath AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient Advanced for Grade 8 in 2013-14 T he 2012-13 sco res were carried fo rward to the 2013-14 scho o l year per the OP I. These test results are f or dif f erent groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student conf identiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.)

Grade 10 Percentage of Students at Proficient/Advanced Levels CRT (Criterion-Referenced Tests) Year READING READING MATH MATH Wolf Point Montana Wolf Point Montana All Students 2011-12 82% 83% 47% 59% 2012-13 79% 82% 27% 56% 2013-14 79% 82% 27% 56% Fem ales 2011-12 87% 86% 48% 58% 2012-13 84% 87% 25% 56% 2013-14 84% 87% 25% 56% Males 2011-12 77% 80% 47% 61% 2012-13 70% 77% 30% 56% 2013-14 70% 77% 30% 56% LEP (Lim ited English 2011-12 NR 27% NR 6% Proficient) 2012-13 NR 20% NR 8% 2013-14 NR 20% NR 8% Econom ically 2011-12 82% 73% 47% 44% Disadvantaged 2012-13 79% 72% 27% 41% 2013-14 79% 72% 27% 41% Special Education 2011-12 NR 45% NR 22% 2012-13 NR 42% NR 18% 2013-14 NR 42% NR 18% Without Disabilities 2011-12 87% 87% 50% 63% 2012-13 85% 87% 29% 60% 2013-14 85% 87% 29% 60% Native Am erican 2011-12 77% 64% 38% 29% 2012-13 76% 60% 12% 28% 2013-14 76% 60% 12% 28% White/Non-Hispanic 2011-12 93% 85% 67% 65% 2012-13 94% 86% 51% 61% 2013-14 94% 86% 51% 61% Reading AYP for CRT = 89.6% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 10 in 2011-12 and 94.8% in 2012-13 M ath AYP for CRT = 80% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 10 in 2011-12 and 90% in 2012-13 Reading AYP for CRT = 100% Proficient/Advanced for Grade 10 in 2013-14 M ath AYP for CRT =100% Proficient Advanced for Grade 10 in 2013-14 These test results are for different groups of students each year. NR = Not Reportable (To ensure student confidentiality, a group of less than 10 students cannot be reported.) The 2012-13 scores were carried forward to the 2013-14 school year as per the OPI agreement with the Federal Department of Education.

ISIP Year Tier Tier Tier Reading 1 2 3 Kindergarten 2013-14 50% 33% 17% 1st Grade 2013-14 51% 24% 25% 2nd Grade 2013-14 59% 22% 19% The percentages indicate the portion of students scoring at each Tier level. Indicators of Progress using the Istation' assessment test: Tier 1: Performing at or above grade level. Tier 2: Performing moderately below grade level. Tier 3: Performing seriously below grade level. Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) for LEP (limited English Proficient Students): At the elementary level the AMAO 1 goal was not met missing the goal by 0.6% for students progressing half of a proficiency level on the ACCESS English language proficiency assessment. The secondary level met the AMAO 1 goal. The elementary level and secondary level both met the AMAO 2 goal for the percentage of students scoring proficient on the ACCESS. The AMAO 3 goal of students making adequate yearly progress based on statewide reading and math assessments was not met because these assessments were not conducted in 2013-14.

Grade 11 Average Ye ar Wolf Point State of ACT Scores D istrict M o ntana Englis h 2011 20.3 21.3 2012 20.4 21.1 2013 17.0 20.2 2014 16.7 19.3 M athe m atics 2011 19.4 21.9 2012 20.0 21.9 2013 18.4 21.4 2014 18.2 20.5 Re ading 2011 21.8 22.7 2012 21.9 22.6 2013 19.5 21.9 2014 19.3 21.1 Scie nce 2011 20.1 22.0 2012 21.2 22.0 2013 18.2 21.2 2014 18.9 20.4 Com pos ite 2011 20.5 22.1 2012 21.0 22.0 2013 18.5 21.3 2014 18.5 20.5 Total Stude nts Year Wolf Point Montana Te s te d 2011 20 6037 2012 20 6024 2013 38 6631 2014 38 9611 College readiness benchmark scores f or designated college courses: *English Composition: 18 on ACT English Test *Algebra: 22 on ACT Mathematics Test *Social Science: 22 on ACT Reading Test *Biology: 23 on ACT Science Test A benchmark score is the minimum score needed on an ACT subjectarea test to indicate a 50% chance of obtaining a B or higher or about a 75% chance of obtaining a C or higher in the corresponding creditbearing college courses. Beginning in 2013 all Juniors w ere required to take the ACT, not just those intending to go to college. There has been a decline in the average scores since all students now take the test. Scores in science increased for Wolf Point students in 2014 and the composite score remained the same compared to 2013.

Second Grade: Year At Grade Above Total for MAP Testing Level Grade Level At/Above Num bers Sense & 2011-12 24% 11% 35% Operations 2012-13 29% 2% 31% Data 2011-12 20% 10% 30% Analysis 2012-13 29% 8% 37% Geom etric 2011-12 29% 7% 36% Reasoning 2012-13 25% 10% 35% Agebraic 2011-12 24% 11% 35% Reasoning 2012-13 25% 6% 31% Third Grade: Year Tier Tier Tier 1 2 3 ISIP Math 2013-14 55% 26% 18% Mid Year ( N o t all st ud ent s t est ed ) ISIP Math 2013-14 44% 28% 28% End of Year The percentages indicate the portion of students scoring at each Tier level. Indicators of Progress using the Istation's assessment test: Tier 1: Performing at or above grade level. Tier 2: Performing moderately below grade level. Tier 3: Performing seriously below grade level.

Percentage of Students At or Above Proficient Levels CRT Tests for Science Grade Science Science Science 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 All Students 4 28% 37% 39% 8 28% 23% 25% 10 30% 22% 19% Females 4 21% 29% 34% 8 30% 28% 32% 10 26% 16% 25% Males 4 34% 46% 44% 8 25% 18% 19% 10 34% 30% 16% LEP (Limited English 4 0% 18% 6% Prof icient) 8 0% 0% 0% 10 NR NR NR Economically 4 28% 37% 39% Disadvantaged 8 28% 23% 25% 10 30% 22% 19% Special Education 4 NR NR NR 8 NR NR NR 10 NR NR NR Without Disabilities 4 30% 41% 44% 8 33% 25% 30% 10 33% 23% 21% Native American 4 25% 34% 37% 8 21% 15% 21% 10 22% 6% 10% White/Non-Hispanic 4 NR NR NR 8 NR NR NR 10 46% 51% NR Science test scores are not part of the AYP determinations for schools and districts, but are mandated tests in grades 4, 8, and 10 under the provisions of NCLB (No Child Left Behind).

The purpose of a school and district report card is to help parents and the general public see where our schools and the districts are succeeding and where there is still work to do. An improvement process, as part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act requirements of data collection, enables educators to make better decisions about teaching and learning. In turn, the reporting of data through report cards helps parents and other community members to work effectively with educators and local school officials to promote school improvement. The current Five Year Comprehensive School Improvement Plans for each school and the district are available for review at the District Office and at each school library. These plans cover 2014-2019. The plans are reviewed and updated each year during the 5 year time span. Interested persons are encouraged to contact Wolf Point Public School officials at 653-2361.