The Effect of the Middleboro Wastewater Treatment Plant on the Water Quality of the Nemasket River

Similar documents
Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

Water Treatment Filtration Lab. discharged into an aquatic ecosystem? We had to build a water filtration system with

How do you treat water based on water quality from different water sources?

Water and Wastewater. Sample Collection and Analysis

OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.

Comparing Levels of Phosphates in Dishwasher Detergents

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

Urban Ecology: Watersheds and Aquatic Ecology A BIOBUGS program

City of Lakeland s Wetlands Treatment System An Overview

Floating Treatment Wetland Technology: Nutrient Removal from Wastewater

Chapter 14 Quiz. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Welcome to the Understanding Dissolved Oxygen learning module. This section provides information on the following topics:

STORMWATER MONITORING: POLLUTANTS, SOURCES, AND SOLUTIONS

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CENTRAL VALLEY REGION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM NO. R NPDES NO.

Cover page photograph: Alain Armellin, Environment Canada

Standards: Human activity has consequences on living organisms and ecosystems. (94412, )

LIMNOLOGY, WATER QUALITY

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Acid Mine Water Remediation a case study

Ginger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University

Total Suspended Solids Total Dissolved Solids Hardness

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Prepared by: Armand Ruby Armand Ruby Consulting in association with Brown and Caldwell

Analysis of the Water Quality of Eighteenmile Creek, Erie County, New York:

THE WATER CYCLE. Ecology

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE RENDERING INDUSTRY. Gregory L. Sindt, P.E. Environmental Engineer Bolton and Menk, Inc.

NPDES Permit No. IL Notice No. AAH: ajo. Public Notice Beginning Date: April 28, Public Notice Ending Date: May 30, 2011

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

The Impact of Golf Course Construction on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities: An Evaluation of Bioassessment Techniques

Rouge River Watershed, MI Region 5. Community Case Study ROU-1. Number of CSO Outfalls. Combined Sewer Service Area. Wastewater Treatment Capacity

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND APPLICATION OF HYDROLOGICAL MODELING TOOLS AT A WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SITE IN NAM DINH, VIETNAM

NPDES Permit No. IL Notice No. SKT: bah. Public Notice Beginning Date: April 9, Public Notice Ending Date: May 9, 2014

Rocky EEP Preliminary Findings Report Summary February 2005

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

78 N ATIONAL SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION PROTOCOL 5. COLLECTING AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES

Lecture Slides Handout

Which of the following can be determined based on this model? The atmosphere is the only reservoir on Earth that can store carbon in any form. A.

Pond Ecosystem Field Study MOLS

WELCOME. 20 th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CALIFORNIA AQUATIC BIOASSESSMENT WORKGROUP DAVIS, CALIFORNIA. OCTOBER 29 and 30, 2013

Mystic River Watershed Association Water Quality Monitoring: Malden River May 28 th 2002

Locating Point and Non-point Sources of Escherichia coli in the Mechumps Creek Watershed, Hanover County, Virginia

Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, Jennong-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea.

Lesson Plan: How Do We Know What is Healthy Water?

Algal Blooms, Circulators, Waterfowl and Eutrophic Greenfield Lake, NC. Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver, Ellen J. Wambach, and Anna R.

New River Cleanup. Progress & Emerging Threats

The Rufford Small Grants Foundation Final Report

ENGINEERING REPORT Sewage Treatment System

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS & BIOMES

PERMITTEE/FACILITY NAME: City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department / Detroit Wastewater Treatment Plant

How to measure Ammonia and Organic Nitrogen: Kjeldahl Method

What types of monitoring do we do? Freshwater (rivers, streams) Marine Waters (bays, ocean) & Tidal Rivers Ambient Ground Water

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

Adam Todd Inn Restaurant

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

THE NEW NSF 350 AND 350-1

Laboratory analysis for wastewater treatment, industrial monitoring, and environmental protection

Missouri Streams. Fact Sheet. By Danny Brown & Jim Czarnezki Edited by Chris Riggert & Sarah Wolken

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Solids Concentrations in Tributaries to the Great Bay Estuary Watershed in 2011

Phosphorus. Phosphorus Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management.

Watershed Education for Teachers. Cinde Thomas-Jimenez Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority

River Friendly Landscape Program Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) February 2016

Natural surface water on earth includes lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, estuaries, seas and oceans.

NAJAFGARH DRAIN-SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

Characterization of water quality in the Los Angeles River

2016 ADEC Seafood Processor Permit Application Instructions

GLOBAL CIRCULATION OF WATER

City of East Lansing CSO Control Facility Evaluation Demonstrative Approach to Meet WQS

City of Charlottetown Wastewater Treatment Expansion & Upgrading

SECTION 6 EXISTING WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Cyanobacteria, Toxins and Indicators. Field Monitoring Treatment Facility Monitoring Treatment Studies

Analysis of Total Suspended Solids and Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations of the Algal- Bacterial Selenium Removal (ABSR) system.

What s For Lunch? Exploring the Role of GloFish in Its Ecosystem, Food Chain and Energy Pyramid

Water remediation: Passive Treatment Technologies

Who is responsible for making sure that wastewater is treated properly?

The Everglades & Northern Estuaries; St. Lucie River Estuary, Indian River Lagoon & Caloosahatchee Estuary. Water Flows & Current Issues

How To Understand And Understand The Effects Of Pollution And Water Quality

Ecosystems and Food Webs

Overview of Best Available Technologies for Onsite Septic Systems and Management Considerations Presentation to NAHB

Life in a Pond. Page 1 of 5. Grade Levels K-5

HOW WATER QUALITY INDICATORS WORK

Biotic Indicators of Water Quality

Lesson 5: Water Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids Water Quality Sampling

An Introduction to the Nitrogen Cycle

Chesapeake Bay and Potomac Tidal Monitoring Programs Past, Present and Future

Anish Jantrania (photo) and Allen Knapp

State of pollution in the Yamuna

Identifying Aquatic Insects From Your Pond

Where does my water come from? Harrisonburg 2013 Hardness Levels

Package Treatment Plant Policy and Procedure

Wastewater Nutrient Removal

Phosphorus Removal. Wastewater Treatment

Turbidity (cm) Using Dot # ph. Dissolved Oxygen (ppm or parts per million) Nitrate (ppm) Phosphate (ppm) Color

Wastewater Regulation and Designing Changes in South East Asia

The Nitrogen Cycle. What is Nitrogen? Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle. How does the nitrogen cycle work?

Economic Benefits from Aquatic Ecological Restoration Projects in Massachusetts Summary of Three Phases of Investigation

Transcription:

Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Watershed Access Lab Projects Watershed Access Lab 2008 The Effect of the Middleboro Wastewater Treatment Plant on the Water Quality of the Nemasket River Recommended Citation Apponequet Regional High School, Lakeville, Massachusetts (2008). The Effect of the Middleboro Wastewater Treatment Plant on the Water Quality of the Nemasket River. In Watershed Access Lab Projects. Project 83. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/wal_projects/83 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts.

The Effect of the Middleboro Wastewater Treatment Plant on the Water Quality of the Nemasket River Stephen Bissonnette Garrett Brune Stacey Bechtel Adam Beard

Nemasket River Name means place of fish in the Wampanoag language Discovered by Europeans in 1853 Early settlers and Native Americans used the river for: Food and water Early industries: grist mills, saw mills, furnaces and forges. Later industries: cotton mills and shovel works The Nemasket river begins at Lake Assawompsett (largest natural body of fresh water in MA) in Lakeville and flows through Middleboro into the Taunton River The river was also called the Canal River and the land, lowland, and swamps through which it flowed were called the Canal Swamps.

Nemasket River Anadromous fish: Alewife, Blueback, American Shad, Gizzard Shad, Lamprey Supports largest coastal river herring population in MA, with more than 1 million fish/year Subbasin Area: 10.9 square miles Length: 11.2 miles Stream order: 3 Confluence with the Taunton River The Middleboro Wastewater Treatment Plant discharges effluent into the river, and we thought it would be interesting to observe the effect it has on the river s quality.

Vaughn Street low traffic levels and low density housing little canopy with seasonal aquatic vegetative blooms Upstream from the Vaughn site is an expanse of wetlands. The wetland area impedes the flow of the water This is our reference site and runs under Vaughn Street. Route 105 medium levels of traffic and surrounded by urban setting partial canopy covering and has vegetation on banks This site also has an auto-body shop located near the bank of the river and a house with a garden directly on the banks of the river. This is also reference site and is located beneath Route 105. Murdock Street low levels of traffic crossing it, and low housing density partial canopy, with vegetation growing on the banks This is our impact site, which flows underneath Murdock Street.

Middleboro Wastewater Treatment Plant Built in 1950 Building of advanced plant took three years (1974-1977) Cost: 5.6 million dollars (25 million dollars today) Processes about 1.3 million gallons of waste a day and is designed to hold up to 2.16 million gallons The treatment plant operates under a very strict NYPDES permit as it empties its effluent close to the NMK headwaters.

Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts Plant s capacity: 2.3 million gallons/day Discharges effluent constantly throughout the day Uses 15% sodium hypochlorite (bleach) as disinfectant This creates a ph of 11, however, the plant does not adjust ph

Wastewater Treatment Plant The plant does not process storm water The plant does process Ocean Spray even though the plant was not originally designed to do so Chlorine is removed with sodium bisulfate Utilize ferric chloride to precipitate out the phosphate Remove ammonia, not nitrate

Future of the Wastewater Treatment Plant The plant anticipates stricter changes in state regulations, such as adding regulations for the removal of nitrate Will need to utilize denitrifying bacteria to convert nitrate into nitrogen gas by adding a carbon food source Concerned about the proposed casino in Middleboro This will significantly add to the plant s load and nutrient levels

Discharge (cfs) Discharge (2007-2008) Nemasket River 200 180 160 Vaughn St. Rt. 105 Murdock St. 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 Date

N/NO3 (mg/l) Concentration of Nitrogen as Nitrate (N/NO3) (mg/l) Nemasket River 5.00 4.50 4.00 Vaughn St. Rt. 105 Murdock St. 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 Date

Load of N/NO3 kg/day Load of Nitrogen as Nitrate (N/NO3) (kg/day) Nemasket River 160.000 140.000 120.000 Vaughn St. Rt. 105 Murdock St. 100.000 80.000 60.000 40.000 20.000 0.000 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 Date

RP (mg/l) Concentration of Reactive Phosphorous (mg/l) Nemasket River 0.16 0.14 Vaughn St. Rt. 105 Murdock St. 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 Date

Rp (kg/day) Load of Reactive Phosphorous (kg/day) Nemasket River 4.500 4.000 Vaughn St. Rt. 105 Murdock St. 3.500 3.000 2.500 2.000 1.500 1.000 0.500 0.000 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 Date

Temperature (øc) Nemasket River Temperature vs Time 10/11-10/12 Rt. 105 Murdock 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 0.042 0.083 0.125 0.167 0.208 0.25 0.292 0.333 0.375 0.417 0.458 0.5 0.542 0.583 0.625 0.667 0.708 0.75 0.792 0.833 0.875 0.917 0.958 0 0.042 Time (hour)

Temperature (øc) Nemasket River Temperature vs. Time 4/3-4/4 Vaughn St. Rt. 105 Murdock St. 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 1:00:00 2:00:00 3:00:00 4:00:00 5:00:00 6:00:00 7:00:00 8:00:00 9:00:00 10:00:00 11:00:00 12:00:00 13:00:00 14:00:00 Time (hours) 15:00:00 16:00:00 17:00:00 18:00:00 19:00:00 20:00:00 21:00:00 22:00:00 23:00:00 0:00:00 1:00:00

DO (mg/l) Nemasket River Dissolved Oxygen vs. Time 10/11-10/12 Rt. 105 Murdock 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 1:00:00 2:00:00 3:00:00 4:00:00 5:00:00 6:00:00 7:00:00 8:00:00 9:00:00 10:00:00 11:00:00 12:00:00 13:00:00 14:00:00 15:00:00 16:00:00 17:00:00 18:00:00 19:00:00 20:00:00 21:00:00 22:00:00 23:00:00 0:00:00 1:00:00 Time (hour)

DO (mg/l) 12 Nemasket River Dissolved Oxygen vs. Time 4/3-4/4 Vaughn St. Rt. 105 Murdock St. 11 10 9 8 7 6 1:00:00 2:00:00 3:00:00 4:00:00 5:00:00 6:00:00 7:00:00 8:00:00 9:00:00 10:00:00 11:00:00 12:00:00 13:00:00 14:00:00 Time (hours) 15:00:00 16:00:00 17:00:00 18:00:00 19:00:00 20:00:00 21:00:00 22:00:00 23:00:00 0:00:00 1:00:00

ph Nemasket River ph vs. Time 10/11-10/12 Rt. 105 Murdock 7.2 7 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6 1:00:00 2:00:00 3:00:00 4:00:00 5:00:00 6:00:00 7:00:00 8:00:00 9:00:00 10:00:00 11:00:00 12:00:00 13:00:00 14:00:00 15:00:00 16:00:00 17:00:00 18:00:00 19:00:00 20:00:00 21:00:00 22:00:00 23:00:00 0:00:00 1:00:00 Time (hour)

ph 7.2 Nemasket River ph vs. Time 4/3-4/4 Vaughn St. Rt. 105 Murdock St. 7 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6 1:00:00 2:00:00 3:00:00 4:00:00 5:00:00 6:00:00 7:00:00 8:00:00 9:00:00 10:00:00 11:00:00 12:00:00 13:00:00 14:00:00 Time (hours) 15:00:00 16:00:00 17:00:00 18:00:00 19:00:00 20:00:00 21:00:00 22:00:00 23:00:00 0:00:00 1:00:00

Macro invertebrates of Route 105 AVERAGE COUNTS Ephemeroptera baetidae 7 Ephemeroptera heptageniidae 48 Ephemeroptera tricorythidae 3 Plecoptera perlidae 1 Tricoptera glossosmatidae 1 Tricoptera hydrosychidae 327 Tricoptera odontoceridae 1 Tricoptera philopotamidae 62 Diptera chironomidae 1 Diptera simuliidae 3 Diptera tipulidae 1 Odonata calopterygidae 1 Coleptera elmidae 3 Coleptera psephenidae 10 Amphipoda 46 Decapoda 1 Gastropoda 3 Pelecypoda 3 Oligochaeta 1 Total number of bugs: 523 Total number of tolerant bugs: 54 Percentage of tolerant bugs: 10.33% Total number of intolerant bugs: 393 Percentage of intolerant bugs: 75.14% Route 105 had a total of 19 species of macro invertebrates. Hilsenhoff Biotic (10-max) Index (HBI): 4.5 Indicates Good water quality

AVERAGE COUNTS Ephemeroptera baetidae 7 Ephemeroptera heptageniidae 12 Plecoptera perlidae 1 Plecoptera perlodidae 2 Plecoptera taeniopterydidae 4 Tricoptera hydropsychidae 279 Trichopter odontoceridae 1 Trichoptera philopotamidae 18 Diptera chironomidae 4 Diptera simuliidae 1 Odonata calopterygidae 2 Odonata lestidae 1 Coleoptera elmidae 2 Amphipoda 9 Isopoda asellidae 1 Decapoda 1 Gastropoda physidae 18 Gastropoda planorbidae 6 Oligochaeta 1 Hirudinea 2 Macro invertebrates of Murdock Street Total number of bugs: 372 Total number of tolerant bugs: 41 Percentage of tolerant bugs: 11.02% Total number of intolerant bugs: 305 Percentage of intolerant bugs: 81.99% Murdock street had a total of 20 species of macro invertebrates. Hilsenhoff Biotic (10-max) Index (HBI): 5.16 Indicates Fair water quality

HBI values HBI: Hilsenhoff Biotic Index 5.4 5.2 5 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4 Route 105 Sites Murdock

Fecal Coliform Tested sites on Rte 105 and Murdock St. Fecal coliform is found in the intestines of animals and is expelled in their waste Grows best at 44.5 C May be present due to effluent in the river from wastewater treatment plant We tested using MFC Broth method

Fecal Coliform Results Rte 105: Murdock St: 100 ml 100 ml 54 colonies 15 colonies 57 colonies 9 colonies 10 ml 10 ml 8 colonies (80/100 ml) 1 colonies (10/100 ml) 7 colonies (70/100 ml) 0 colonies

Rte 105 Fecal Coliform Colonies

Murdock St. Fecal Coliform Colonies

Conclusion Indeed the Wastewater Treatment Plant has an effect on the Nemasket River The plant successfully removes fecal coliform bacteria The plant does not, however, completely remove nitrates and phosphorus Macro invertebrates are affected down stream from the plant at Murdock St. 5.16 HBI compared to 4.5 HBI at Rte 105

Documentations Behar, Sharon. Testing the Waters. River Watch Network: Portland, Oregon, 1997.

Accreditations A Special Thanks to: Kim McCoy for her much appreciated help in the field and with the fecal coliform testing. Mr. Joseph Ciaglo for his informative tour of the Middleboro Wastewater Treatment Plant.

The End Thanks for watching!