Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method



Similar documents
RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Plan

3. Which relationship can correctly be inferred from the data presented in the graphs below?

Natural Resource-Based Planning*

Timberland Property Tax in Texas. Yanshu Li Texas Forest Service

Techniques and Tools for Monitoring Wildlife on Small Woodlands

APPLICATION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FOREST LAND

Fayette County Appraisal District

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER

agricultural economy agriculture CALIFORNIA EDUCATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE I Unit I Cultivating California I Word Wall Cards 426WWC

These Maps Are For The Birds

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

PUZZLING PIPES. Grade Level: 4-6

Ranger Report About Deforestation of the Rainforest

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PROPERTY or MANAGED AREA) (TOWN or COUNTY, STATE) (TIME PERIOD; e.g )

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

Use: Cooperative farming as a habitat management tool to enhance and restore refuge grasslands

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

Weed Survey and Mapping

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

American Forest Foundation (AFF) Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

ENDANGERED AND THREATENED

Ecology 1 Star. 1. Missing from the diagram of this ecosystem are the

Dawn Reis Ecological Studies.

Management Plan Template For Conservation Easements Held by CPW

Non-consumptive use of wildlife. Non-consumptive Use. Non-consumptive Use

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

Controlling Invasive Plants and Animals in our Community

France s biodiversity at risk

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS. For a map of this information, in paper or digital format, contact the Tompkins County Planning Department.

Use this diagram of a food web to answer questions 1 through 5.

Monitoring Riparian Areas With a Camera

CHAD R. GOURLEY SPECIALTY EMPLOYMENT

Natural surface water on earth includes lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, estuaries, seas and oceans.

Pest Control Methods and Tips

Appendix A: Land Protection Plan

The Wonderful World of Wetlands BINGO

3.1 Measuring Biodiversity

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

CONTENTS ABSTRACT. KEYWORDS:. Forest ownership, forest conversion.

Hydrogeology Experiment on Surface-Groundwater Interactions: How Do Our Actions Affect Water Quantity and Quality?

Alaska Forest Pest Control Supplemental Information. Category Twelve

PHOTO: Jon Waterman THE COLORADO RIVER DELTA, CIRCA NOW OPEN BOOKLET TO SEE CHANGE

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Restoration Program Design Review Group. Project Summary Outline

Designing in Sustainability in an Utility Scale Photovoltaic Array. Tim Green, Brookhaven National Laboratory Richard Chandler, BP Solar October 2010

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

Wetland Vocabulary Organizer

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Human Impact to Wetlands

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Solar PV panels fitted to roofs. Solar PV panels produce electricity from energy provided by sunlight. 3.5 MWh per system

Finding a Sustainable Management Strategy for the Tongass National Forest Opportunities and Challenges

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

Grades 3-5. Benchmark A: Use map elements or coordinates to locate physical and human features of North America.

China The Giant Panda

Environmental Law Primer. Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

EFB / Online Wetland Restoration Techniques Class Syllabus

Town of Richmond Hill Community Stewardship Program

Lesson Overview. Biodiversity. Lesson Overview. 6.3 Biodiversity

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

Waterway Technote Planning

Prepared By: Eric Chamberlain

Grade Level Content Expectations addressed: Activities: Schedule of Field Trip Activities at the Detroit Zoo 8:15 am Board Bus at School

Experienced Planning and Design

Ch. 15-Restoration Ecology

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Forest Management Guidelines for the Protection of Four-toed and Spotted Salamander Populations Carol Hall & Bruce Carlson May 2004

Land Protection Planning for the National Wildlife Refuge System

U.S. SOYBEAN SUSTAINABILITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOL

Chapter Four Resource Management Plan

Green Infrastructure Case Study Template

Town of Richmond Hill Beaver Management Policy Summary

Laws to promote environmental sustainability of oceans and seas

DECLARATION OF ROBIN SILVER

The Conservation Reserve Program: 45th Signup Results

Transcription:

Then and Now Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes Method Subject Areas: environmental education, science, social studies Conceptual Framework Topic References: HIIIB, HIIIB1, HIIIB2, HIIIB3, HIIIC3, ITIIIA, ITIIIA2 Duration: one or two 45-minute sessions Setting: indoors Key Terms: fragmentation, habitat, land use Students will compare aerial photographs that are of a community and were taken 50 years apart. They will identify features resulting from human settlement. Using a transparent grid, they will next measure and then discuss changes to wildlife habitat that have occurred over time as a result of human population growth. Objectives Students will: 1. Describe ways that human settlements have influenced wildlife habitat and populations. 2. Interpret aerial photographs and related sources of information. 3. Describe the effects of human-made structures on native and non-native species. If soil survey, topographical or aerial maps are not available for your community, the photographs at the end of this activity may be used. (They were taken over Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The first was taken in 1950; the second was taken in 1996.) By studying two photographs taken decades apart, students can measure and compare the changes that have occurred. Background Many changes alter a wildlife habitat. In turn, those changes in habitat may change the types and numbers of wildlife species living in the area. All wildlife creatures need food, water, shelter, and space. When any of those parts of a habitat are changed, the numbers and kinds of wildlife also change. As early as the 1930s, land-use planners were using aerial photography to assist in map Some changes actually create new habitat for wildlife. Water Materials Transparent grid, 2 aerial photographs of a community, Human Related Changes chart, species list making and to measure changes in land use. Specially equipped airplanes can fly identical routes over several years and can take photographs that will be compared over time. This procedure results in an accurate record of what has happened to the land as the years have passed by. AWARENESS I 41

storage structures such as reservoirs can increase waterfowl and fish populations. Hardwood trees planted in towns might attract songbirds that otherwise would not be found in the area. Agricultural lands provide food for a variety of wildlife, including elk, deer, birds, and small mammals. Some changes may reduce the number of certain wildlife species. For example, changes from agricultural to residential areas will reduce the amount of food available for deer and elk. Highway construction can disrupt the migration of wildlife. Development in forested areas will reduce the amount of habitat available for wildlife. Preparation 1. Make a copy of the aerial photographs for each group of two or three students. 2. Make a transparency of the grid for each student group. 3. Make a copy of the Human Related Changes chart and the Species List for each student group. NOTE: If possible, ask the local planning commission or natural resource agency for names of guest speakers who can provide aerial photographs and can discuss changes in land use and wildlife habitat. Procedure 1. Have students work in groups of two or three. Give each group a copy of the two aerial photographs and a transparent grid. Have the groups study the photographs and list features that have been constructed, altered, or eliminated. Make students aware that the two photographs may not line up exactly. Examples of things to look for include these: Constructed roads, ponds, houses, industrial parks, farm buildings, and reservoirs Altered streams, rivers, and lakes Eliminated railroads, forests, trees, grass land, meadows, lakes, and wetlands. 2. Have the students use the transparent grid to determine how much of each change has occurred. Ask them to compare the number of squares of each habitat type. For example, how many squares of forest area are in each picture? How many squares of highway are in each picture? 3. Distribute copies of the Human-Related Changes chart to each group. Ask students to discuss ways in which the features might affect wildlife habitats and species. Answers might include changes in types and amounts of food, water, shelter, and space. 4. Distribute copies of the Species List. Ask students to predict how that species list would be affected by the changes seen in the aerial photographs. 5. Use these discussion questions: What human-made features in Colorado (or in your own community) have been 42 I AWARENESS

harmful to native wildlife and why? Examples: roads create travel barriers; houses remove habitat; mines, farms, and ranches use water and change habitat; timber harvest alters forest diversity. What features have been beneficial to wildlife, both native and non-native? Examples: reservoirs create waterfowl, shorebird, and fish habitats; farms and ranches provide grain for animals to eat; golf courses provide open space and food for some species of wildlife. What three actions taken by members of your own community could be harmful to native wildlife? Examples: building a shopping center on open land; draining wetlands for housing; building a highway across wildlife migration routes. What three actions taken by members of your own community could benefit native wildlife? Examples: controlling use of pesticides in neighborhoods and city parks; developing nature centers with exhibits and activities for families and schools; purchasing open land to protect wildlife habitat from development. Evaluation Give students the following directions: Using the data you generated about land uses in 1950 and 1996, construct a pie graph for each time frame to show the development of different land uses and the effect on wildlife habitat over time. Label your pie graph, and add a one- or two-sentence description of what it shows. Extensions 1. Have students research the history of development in their own community. How did the community change over time? What laws and regulations controlled change? When were such laws and regulations passed and why? 2. Have the students research native plants and animals inhabiting their local area or state prior to human development. Have any species become threatened, endangered or extinct? How has human development affected these species? How do the earlier species compare with those found in the local area or state today? Are there any non-native species inhabiting the local area or state today? 3. After reviewing what makes up a community, have the students design their own communities, What requirements would they have for their communities? What laws or regulations would they establish? Ask the students to draw or build a model of their communities. What provisions for the future would be made? What measures would be taken to conserve the environment? Sources Adapted with permission of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and reprinted with permission of Colorado Division of Wildlife. AWARENESS I 43

Then and Now S T U D E N T PA G E 1 O F 5 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 1950 Scale: 1 inch = 1050 feet (Aerial photos donated by Colorado Aerial Photo Service, Denver.) 44 I AWARENESS

STUDENT PAGE 2 OF 5 AWARENESS I 45

STUDENT PAGE 3 OF 5 46 I AWARENESS

STUDENT PAGE 4 OF 5 TEMPLATE FOR GRID TRANSPARENCY Scale 1 inch = 1050 feet; 1 square (1/2 inch) = 275,625 square feet 1 square = about 6 acres AWARENESS I 47

Then and Now S T U D E N T PA G E 5 O F 5 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 1996 Scale: 1 inch = 1050 feet (Aerial photos donated by Colorado Aerial Photo Service, Denver.) 48 I AWARENESS